Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tim Wakefield Retires

Cowboys Third Down Offense: Inside the Numbers

The 2009 Cowboys had the most prolific offense in franchise history with 6,390 yards, handily outpacing the 1978 Cowboys (5,916) and ranking second in the NFL, just 71 yards shy of the New Orleans Saints. The Cowboys also ranked No.1 in yards per first down play (6.52) and total yards per play on offense (6.3). 

Many were the offensive highlights we saw last year, from Miles Austin's franchise record breaking 250 receiving yards against Kansas City, Felix Jones' league leading 5.9 yards per rush attempt, Tony Romo's career high and franchise record 4,483 passing yards, his league leading 2,154 yards after catch, and so on and so forth.

So how come the Cowboys ended up with only the 14th best scoring offense? Not enough takeaways to give the offense a short field position; a not very effective kick return game, resulting in unfavorable field position for the offense; perhaps our red zone offense is part of the answer, as are the placekicker issues the Cowboys had - take your pick. Another part of the answer could well be the Cowboys third down offense.

The official stats show that last season the Cowboys managed to convert 40.5% of their third downs (82/202), and were ranked a middling 14th in the NFL. That 40.5% conversion rate is the lowest for a Cowboys team since 2005. The one piece of good news in this stat is that the 202 third downs were actually the sixth fewest in the NFL (the NFL average was 215) - looks like the Cowboys offense was pretty good at avoiding third down situations all together.

To better understand what was or wasn't happening on third downs, we'll need to look at some stat breakdowns.

Star-divide

The stats in this post are broken down by 'distance to go' on third down, and follow the NFL definitions for short and medium situations. I've broken up third and long situations into 8-10 yards and 11+ yards as they will be relevant for the analysis.

Distance required

As you look at distance to go on third down, you would naturally assume that the longer the distance, the less likely a first down conversion becomes. And you would be right in that assumption. 

Advancednflstats.com have run an excellent analysis detailing first down probability, which they've summarized in the graph below. Notice the almost linear decrease in conversion probability, both in second and third down situations.

Probability_large_medium

courtesy of advancednflstats.com

The Cowboys have faced roughly the same number of down situations for all distance to go situations, from short, medium, long and very long third down situations. And it's no surprise that the conversion rate drops as the distance to go increases.

What does come as a surprise is that our conversion rate on third and medium is well below the norm. According to the graph, we should expect a conversion rate in the mid forties, but the Cowboys come in at 32%. The Cowboys have a better conversion rate on third and long than they do on third and medium!

Cowboys third down conversions by distance required, 2009


Short (1-3) Medium (4-7) Long (8-10) Very Long* (11+)
Attempts
54 53 46 46
Conversions
36 17 20 9
in %
67% 32% 44% 20%

We'll look at these numbers in more detail below as we break down the passing and rushing game, but two notes* on the 46 very long situations: I've excluded three knees Romo took on third and very long. Also, 21 of those 46 third and very long situations were the result of one or more penalties on the previous plays and 14 resulted from sacks on previous plays.

Passing

Romo's completion rate on third downs is 56%. Not good by any stretch of the imagination, but if you were to take out Roy Williams' numbers, it would improve to 63%. Now before I get blasted again for fiddling with the numbers, take it as food for thought only, perhaps there is a lesson in there somewhere ...

Pass completion percentages by down and distance, 2009


Short
(1-3)
Medium
(4-7)
Long
(8-10)
Very Long
(11+)
Passes
25 43 39 37
Pass compl. % 72% 40% 64% 57%
1st dn%
64% 33% 51% 24%
Sacks
1 2
4
3

Of the 43 pass plays in third and medium situations the Cowboys converted only 14. It should come as no surprise that only Austin converted for a first down with any regularity, converting seven of nine passes thrown his way for a first down. Even Jason Witten (4-11) did not shine at this distance. Roy Williams (2-10) and Patrick Crayton (1-6) at least caught a pass, Tashard Choice failed twice (0-2), all others were 0-1 (Marion Barber, Martellus Bennett, Sam Hurd, John Phillips). The question here is, what are the one or two pass plays on medium yardage that the Cowboys could and should use with a fairly high success rate?

Nowhere has Barber's fractured thumb and torn quad affected us more than on these medium distance passes. In 2008, Barber caught 52 of 62 passes overall for a league leading 85.2% reception rate. This year, he's only 26 for 36, and that's critical production quantity and quality the Cowboys sorely missed.

No other quarterback in the NFL has had to pass on more third and long/very long situations ithan Tony Romo (76 pass attempts on third an 8+). That is one big, ugly stat to hold the lead in. Remarkably, Stats LLC shows Romo with the fourth best completion percentage at that distance in the league at 38.2. It would stand to reason that the longer the distance required on third down, the lower the conversion rate would be, but Romo actually completes more passes in third and long/very long situations than in third and medium situations.

Target Distribution

Every week, NFL quarterbacks line up on third down knowing that if they can connect with their clutch receiver - that go-to guy who rarely lets them down - they can keep a drive alive rather than head back to the sidelines in frustration. So who's that guy for Tony Romo?

Passing target distribution, third down:

Name Targets Cmp Cmp %
1st down
1st dn %
Witten 34 24 71% 15 44%
Austin 32 21 66% 17 53%
Crayton 24 15 63% 13 54%
Williams 26 7 27% 6 23%
Choice 10 7 70% 3 33%
Ogletree 4 4 100% 3 75%
Bennett 5 1 20% 1 20%
Hurd 3 1 33% 1 33%
Jones 1 1 100% 0 0%
Barber 3 0 0% 0 0%
Phillips 1 0 0% 0
0%
Total 144 81 56% 59 41%

Stat geek alert: Click on the column headers to sort the table to your liking

While Witten continued to impress with a high reception rate, this has not translated into above average third down conversions. Miles Austin and, much to my surprise, Patrick Crayton, are now heavily involved in the battle for 'Romo's security blanket' - a battle that is sure to extend well into training camp and will most likely also feature Kevin Ogletree.

Williams on the other hand will have to do a lot of, excuse the pun, 'catching up' to stay in that battle. 19 of 26 passes on third down not caught simply doesn't cut it.

Rushing

Running backs first down conversions by down and distance, 2009


Short
(1-3)
Medium
(4-7)
Long
(8-10)
Very Long
(11+)
Attempts
26 7 3 2
1st dn% 69% 29% 0% 0%

The numbers above are the rushing stats for the running backs only. Romo's numbers: 2/2 on third and short, 1/1 on third and medium, 0/4 on some desperate third and very long scrambles (18, 18, 20 and 24 yards to go).

On third and medium, the running backs ran the ball seven times and converted two times.

Rushing target distribution, third down

Name Att 1st down
1st dn %
Barber 21 12 57%
Choice 12 6 50%
Romo 7 3 43%
Jones 5 2 40%
Total 45 23 51%

 

Stats LLC rank Barber's 57% conversion rate on third down as the 16th best in the league. Noteworthy for a rushing ranking is that four quarterbacks make it into the top six (Rodgers, Sanchez, Garrard, Campbell) with high third down rushing conversion percentages.

The rushing stats also give an indication of the roles each of the three running backs on the Cowboys squad has: Only 4% of Felix Jones' rushes are on third down (5/116), Marion Barber: 10% (21/214) and Tashard Choice: 19% (12/64).

Conversely, 62% of Jones' rushes are on first downs (72/116), and his 6.0 YPC on first is ranked third in the NFL behind Kansas City's Jamaal Charles and Baltimore's Willis McGahee, both with 6.4. Barber rushed on first downs on 57% of his carries (122/214), Choice on 56% (36/64).

Comment 55 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Is the 3rd down conversion rate stable from year to year.

That would be very interesting and would be the first thing I’d want to look at. Do you have the statistics for 3rd down conversion rate for the last couple years?

Excellent post.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 15, 2010 12:29 PM CST reply actions  

Since Romo took over

2006 – 49% (2nd in NFL)
2007 – 42% (10th)
2008 – 43% (9th)

Most of the good Cowboys teams were high 30s – low 40s percentage. In 2002, Quincy and Chad converted 24% of their 3rd downs. Yikes.

40% is traditionally a decent number, overall. I’d be happier if they could convert 3rd and shorts more regularly.

by DavidH22 on Feb 15, 2010 12:52 PM CST reply actions  

NFL averages:

NFL average from 2002-2009: 38.5%. Low of 37.4 in 2003, High of 39.5 in 07 & 08.

by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 15, 2010 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

NFL.com

Copy and paste the league tables into Excel, and proceed to calculate the averages.

by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 15, 2010 1:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks

BTW, I looked at the figures for all the teams. The 3rd down conversion % looks stable for all teams. Hence I think we can safely say that this is determined by the performace of the coaches and the offensive player performance (i.e. we’re not being fooled by random variation).

Some observations about 3rd down conversion %:

Indy has led the league the last 4 years.
New Orleans has been in the top 5 the last 4 seasons
New England has been in the top 8 the last 4 seasons
Minny leaped to 5th after being 19th (2008), 27th (2007), and 29th (2006) (this is especially interesting because it indicates that Farve was responsible for the change. We can infer that the QB has a impact on the 3rd down completion percentage)
Sparono must have the 3rd down secret sauce because Miami leaped to 2nd after being 21st (2008), 23rd (2007), 17th (2006)

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 15, 2010 5:54 PM CST up reply actions  

to add to the point about Sparano, it warrants mentioning that the peak for Romo’s 3rd down conversion % (49%) was in 2006 when Sparano was still in Dallas.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 15, 2010 6:02 PM CST up reply actions  

where does one find whether the 3rd down was short, medium, or long

I’m guessing there’s a strong correlation between 3rd down conversion % and how long the average 3rd down conversion was (i.e. the higher % of short 3rd down attempts / total 3rd down attempts, the higher the total 3rd down conversion %.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 15, 2010 6:19 PM CST up reply actions  

3rd Down Conversion

It looks like the key to a high overall 3rd down conversion percentage is staying out of 3rd and long situations.

I calculated what percentage each type of 3rd down (short, medium, and long) accounted for total 3rd down. Then I ranked each QB (they don’t have team figures) by % of each type. Remember, it’s good to have be ranked #1 for short 3rd down attempts / total 3rd down attempts and it’s bad to be ranked #1 for long 3rd down attempts / total 3rd down attempts (i.e. you want to have short 3rd downs).

Here are the calcs and the rankings.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Agk02f2ctUQLdDN0MkF4NUkzUGFXRWpaVUNGTE94VkE&hl=en

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 16, 2010 8:13 AM CST up reply actions  

i appreciate the irony of you calling me a freak :)

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 16, 2010 8:30 AM CST up reply actions  

when you compare the two we can see some patterns.

It’s not that important to be in third and short (Washington actually had the most 3rd and shorts at 15.8% of total 3rd down plays). It’s critical to stay out of 3rd and long though.

Here are the top 5 teams in overall 3rd down conversions.

Indy, Miami, GB, NO, Minny.

They were 30th, 27th, 17th, 31st, 19th in long 3rd downs / total 3rd down.

The worst 5 teams in overall 3rd down conversions.

Clev, St. Louis, San Fran, Oakland, KC.

They were 15th, 13th, 7th, 6th, and 1st in long 3rd downs as a % of total 3rd downs.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 16, 2010 8:29 AM CST up reply actions  

You know who’s an outlier …. Tony Romo.

Romo had the 2nd highest % of long third downs as a % of total 3rd downs, and Dallas was still 13th in overall 3rd down conversion %.

I think that’s either Garrett’s playcalling leading to 3rd and longs or the penalities. It’d be interesting to compare the penalty rate to the % of long 3rd downs / total 3rd downs.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 16, 2010 8:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Not sure if this matters of not

but Garrett’s play-calling has led to many 3rd and longs. Specifically, his refusal to run twice in a row after gaining 5 or fewer yards on first down. I had a couple comments during the 2009 season which showed that when the Cowboys ran the ball on first down for 5 or fewer yards, they almost always (around 90% of the time) followed it up with a pass play, instead of another run. I believe that this led to the Cowboys facing more 3rd and longs, as this propensity to pass on 2nd and 5+ yards led to incompletions, penalties and sacks, which of course results in long 3rd downs.

by DavidH22 on Feb 16, 2010 9:50 AM CST up reply actions  

I remember your comments during the season.

I think you’d find this write up interesting.

It suggests a team needs to gain more than 4.5 yards on first down to hold the probability of getting a first down constant at 66%. I suspect this figures heavily in Garrett’s decision making.

http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/07/first-down-probability.html

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 16, 2010 10:00 AM CST up reply actions  

to fully explain

I think the Cowboy’s averaged ~4.8 yards per rushing attempt.

so lets say Dallas has a 2 & 9. They run, and get 4.8 yards setting up a 3rd & 4. Dallas converted 40% of the 3rd and mediums, so for the combination of run & pass, the probability of a first down is slightly north of 40% (some % of the 2nd down runs will get a 1st down).

On the other hand, Romo converted 40% of his 3rd & longs (which I’ll use a proxy for 2nd & long which we don’t have the statistics for). So if Garrett thinks he’s got a 40% probabiliy on a 2nd and long pass and a 40% probability on 3rd and long pass, passing on 2nd and 3rd down gives him something closer to an 80% probability of a 1st down.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 16, 2010 10:21 AM CST up reply actions  

BTW,

I know this is obvious. Stay out of long 3rd downs and you’ll have a higher overall 3rd down completion rate.

However, it’s not always as obvious as you might think. I looked at some other factors that I thought might be good explanations but weren’t. For example, sack rate and QB completion % didn’t appear to be good explanations.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 16, 2010 8:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Stats Don't Lie

What the passing stats say is get rid of Roy WIlliams and use Austin, Crayton and Ogletree on 3rd downs. And if you really wanted to do the team a favor, leave Williams out of the mix on 1st and 2nd down too, then maybe you would have even fewer 3rd downs to contend with.

by ejhanlon on Feb 15, 2010 1:15 PM CST reply actions  

Another great post...

The thing that jumped out at me was the failure to get first downs in 3rd and medium situations (and the accompanying low completion percentage). My first thought is that this indicates a relative lack of success at hitting timing routes in the face of the blitz since it is these medium situations that tend to entice blitzing. As for why we have these troubles, I think a lot of it has to do with our O-line’s ability to have brain freezes at crucial times and our receivers not releasing off the line well enough to flash open quickly for Romo (Austin and maybe Ogletree excluded).

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Feb 15, 2010 1:18 PM CST reply actions  

I think the line gets them into some of these problems

but they probably also allow a little too much penetration on 3rd down to pass effectively.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Feb 15, 2010 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Definitely...

There were a good amount of times this year that Tony would drop back with the defense expecting the pass only to find a blitzer coming at him due to a whiffed block.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Feb 15, 2010 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Good Stuff

I don’t know if you can keep it up for lengthy off-season, but I am enjoying your posts.

One error to point out in your Rushing for 3rd and medium discussion. In the text, you say they were 3 for 7, but in the table you have it at 29%, which would be 2 for 7.

by doomsdayreturns on Feb 15, 2010 1:27 PM CST reply actions  

thanks, corrected, it’s 2 for 7 for the RBs, Romo was 1 for 1 – and wow, do you have an eye for detail!

by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 15, 2010 1:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Are we really going to waste another year on Roy?

could he do better this year? Of course. Is it likely? probably not. You are a fool if you choose to take the least likely approach with Roy, which is keeping him.

2009 BTB Fantasy Champ... Deal with it

by quincyyyyy on Feb 15, 2010 1:32 PM CST reply actions  

All you need to know...
Ogletree 4 4 100% 3 75%

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Feb 15, 2010 1:37 PM CST reply actions  

sample size my good man

sample size

2009 BTB Fantasy Champ... Deal with it

by quincyyyyy on Feb 15, 2010 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

True

But if Ogletree had ten more balls thrown to him last year, and he dropped all ten, he still would have had a higher completion and success rate than Roy Williams.

Just sayin.’

by kindablue on Feb 15, 2010 3:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Ha! Nice and true.

BTB League Consolation Ladder Champ...thought you knew.

by Aaron Novinger on Feb 15, 2010 4:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Ouch.

It hurts because it’s true.

by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 15, 2010 5:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Haha

well played sir.

John McClain: Welcome to the party, pal!

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Feb 15, 2010 6:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Considering how many times penalties put us in 3rd and long situations

I think Romo did a great job on converting 3rd downs all year.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Feb 15, 2010 1:55 PM CST reply actions  

I wonder if the number of passes

to the running backs , especially Barber was skewed by the amount they were kept in the backfield to protect Tony. It seemed we were using max protect an awful lot more this year. Just an impression haven’t checked the numbers. It may also be interesting to see how those number compare to the same down and distance in the red zone.

BTW it may be interesting to see what will happen if Ogletree can get on the same page with his quarterback. It was just his first year.

by oldboysfan on Feb 15, 2010 2:29 PM CST reply actions  

I think the decreased passes to the backs is part of the reason for the low %.

The yardage area where we struggle is perfect for hitting a back and letting him fight for the yardage, especially with Witten clearing out the middle. I think Dallas could use more passes to their backs and less to some of their receivers.

by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 15, 2010 7:54 PM CST up reply actions  

OCC, you're nothing if you aren't prolific

Great post.

Question:

How did Dallas stack up against the rest of the NFL in terms of 3rd down distance?

Said differently, did Dallas face more 3rd and medium than the NFL average (or how about using the 4 combatants in the conference title games as an added filter)? Did they face more 3rd and very long?

The reason I ask is that the 3rd down efficiency tends to revolve around 1st and 2nd down efficiency.

This comment will self destruct in 10 seconds…

"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Feb 15, 2010 3:31 PM CST reply actions  

Interesting question

I already mentioned that Romo had the most 3rd and 8+ in the league. Here’s how the 4 conference title contestants stack up vs. Romo in terms of attempts on 3rd and short, medium and long (per Stats LLc)

Romo: 14 – 54 – 76
Favre: 14 – 69 – 67
Brees: 15 – 67 – 46
Sanchez: 13 – 69 – 55
Manning: 19 – 74 – 53

Note: Brees and Sanchez started only 15 games.

by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 15, 2010 4:09 PM CST up reply actions  

He had the fewest 3rd and medium

So the degree of difficulty he faced was significantly higher than his contemporaries.

Again, I have to say that the running game is the key to keeping down and distance manageable in 3rd down situations.

At one point in the season, Dallas seemed to have lost the parts of the playbook with the running plays in it.

I wonder how that hurt them.

"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Feb 16, 2010 5:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Keep this in mind

Romo converted 40.7 of 3rd and mediums
Romo converted 38.2 of 3rd and longs

The probabiliy of conversion on 3rd down passes only improved 2.5% by getting to 3rd & medium instead of 3rd and long.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 16, 2010 6:01 PM CST up reply actions  

It may be that the breakdown of what is a medium versus a long is out of whack

"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Feb 17, 2010 4:58 PM CST up reply actions  

good scientific method

ignore statistics that don’t support your preferred hypothesis (i.e. that Garrett passed too much). Also ignore the two super bowl teams that don’t run at all while you’re at it.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 18, 2010 7:11 AM CST up reply actions  

The only really bad game in that regard

was the GB game. My guess is Romo saw quite a large percentage of those 3rd and longs that game.

by foyesboys on Feb 16, 2010 6:26 PM CST up reply actions  

that 76 is ridiculous

a lot of it is due to penalties and a little due to our inconsistant run game

by foyesboys on Feb 16, 2010 6:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I would have to agreee with you

there looks to be a relationship between penalties and the % of 3rd down attempts that are long attempts. I’ll post the ranks in a min.

KC and Jacksonville break the rule though.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 16, 2010 6:55 PM CST up reply actions  

here you go

http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Agk02f2ctUQLdGFtZXQyYTdXWDA0b1BiNGJHYVNNYUE&hl=en

remember that the teams that rank 1st in long 3rd down / total third down had the most long third downs (i.e. it’s bad to be 1st in long 3rd down %).

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 16, 2010 7:03 PM CST up reply actions  

How many of those actually came from penalties?

"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Feb 17, 2010 4:59 PM CST up reply actions  

18 due to penalties, 12 due to sacks, one due to a fumble. All others were from negative yardage plays.

by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 18, 2010 2:53 AM CST up reply actions  

This stuff rocks.

I’d love to see Felix’ 3rd-down carries move way, way up towards grabbing a bigger percentage of his total carries.

BTB League Consolation Ladder Champ...thought you knew.

by Aaron Novinger on Feb 15, 2010 4:27 PM CST reply actions  

Nice numbers

I hope we can see some improvement w/ Bennett, I’m sure we will see some w/ Ogletree and praying that we see some from Roy…If those 3 improve, our offense improves and mainly Bennett and Roy need to get better since they are nice Red zone targets

by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 15, 2010 6:53 PM CST reply actions  

Awesome post OCC

Thanks for digging this stuff up. I hope Garrett has a stats guy as good as you working for him!

by Silverblue on Feb 15, 2010 7:59 PM CST reply actions  

I don't know if Garrett has a stat guy this good (I would expect so)

but it appears that DC.com is lifting or plagiarizing stories from the BTB. I read this story and it felt like déjà-vu, like something Rafa would have written. This story is about as self critical as I have ever seen at the mother ship. It’s almost as if someone is listening.

http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/news.cfm?id=D4208A10-F00B-5BE5-6A11398AC3399919&editorialAuthor=12

Woodson is a Hall of Famer!!!

by I'm a Cowboy on Feb 15, 2010 10:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Amazing Stuff

WOW..Great stuff..I follow you posts with great interest..I can’t wait for the next installment..Eye opening stuff..Keep up the good work..

by bevomav on Feb 15, 2010 10:20 PM CST reply actions  

Look At Roy W - That says a lot

Williams on the other hand will have to do a lot of, excuse the pun, ‘catching up’ to stay in that battle. 19 of 26 passes on third down not caught simply doesn’t cut it.

This stat says a lot. Roy should be able to help us here…………

by oldtimer on Feb 16, 2010 7:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
Jason Garrett: From Process to Promise
Rush_hour_small
Is Doug Free Overpaid?
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Hindsight Games Part 1: J.J. Watt
Rush_hour_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario

Recent FanPosts

Small
Probability of Success
Small
An open letter response to Jason Hatcher (and other underachieving *&^%$# players on the Dallas Cowboys)
Small
Lets Wheel and deal.
Small
Could Terence Newman have been playing injured?
Cowboysmetal_small
NFL Player Salary Problem Solved.
Small
Offseason Priorities
Small
Starters, dominant players, and BPA
Dez_bryant_small
What we need is for Jerrah to act like a GM and be proactive and fix the team with $17M under the cap resources

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui