Dear Fellow Dallas Fans; Why Do You Want Romo Gone?
The Dallas Cowboys have been the center of criticism and unwarranted jabs for a long time.
That said, I can honestly state that this team is one of the best in the league, especially since it won its first playoff game in over a decade. It was a long time coming for us Dallas fans, and I treasure that moment up with the ones you would have on today’s holiday of Valentines Day.
However, I was sitting with my close friend and the conversation included college majors, the artwork in our homes, old memories, and finally it drifted to sports.
And I heard something from her I couldn’t believe. She actually wished that Tony Romo was off the Cowboys.
Immediately I was stunned because Tony’s coming off his best season ever. 347/550 pass completions to attempts with a 63.1 completion percentage, 4,483 yards passing, 26 passing touchdowns to only NINE interceptions, and a 97.6 quarterback rating.
Plus, we won a playoff game!!!
What else do you want? Yeah, I know. You want to win the Super Bowl; who doesn’t?
It just ruffles my feathers when I hear the fans I represent take advantage of what Dallas has in its possession. We have a top ten quarterback and they want to catapult him out of Dallas?
I think of the days when we had Quincy Carter or Drew Bledsoe starting for us. Or how about that three game stretch in 2008 with Brad Johnson as a starter?
Those were some dark times. With Tony Romo however, we are never counted as an automatic loss ever. No team suits up against us thinking they can just check this one off the to-do list.
It’s offensive and somewhat asinine to be against Tony Romo after what he has done for us. We finally have a shot at the whole thing; Lombardi Trophy, parade, and all with Romo.
That’s something we never had with Drew Bledsoe, who looked more like a worn-out punching bag at times.
That first year in 2007 when Tony Romo took over as the starter, you knew that Dallas actually had a shot. That we weren’t battling for a lower draft spot or a season about .500, we actually had a shot.
What does Tony do? He throws 36 touchdowns and we win 13 games. Get first round bye, but are knocked out by the eventual champions, the New York Giants.
Yeah, we didn’t win it all, but we made progress! Rome wasn’t built in a day.
I think the fans or viewers that harshly critique the Cowboys as losers, and Tony Romo as a incompetent player, should either jump in a lake or read Football For Dummies.
Is their any legitimate argument that Tony Romo needs to be replaced other than the fact that he doesn’t have a Super Bowl ring yet?
Is that all that the negative people have?
Ok, lets see, just a few weeks ago, Drew Brees didn’t have a title. Should the Saints have looked for someone else instead?
Peyton Manning was in his ninth season before he won the Super Bowl. Should the Colts have scrapped him back in 04?
I think it is pure impatience by fans who want to win the Super Bowl, and since Dallas has this great history of winning the Super Bowl, they believe that the team should win it right now.
Football is not royalty, there is no entitlement to the fans for anything. All we can do is hope and pray for our players. They are trying very hard to win the Super Bowl, but we need to be patient because this isn’t Troy Aikman, who actually took five years to win the Super Bowl, and the 90s Cowboys. These are the 2010 Cowboys fresh off a playoff win and ready to kick some butt.
There are all these fans that think the solution is to change quarterbacks and every time I hear that, I just scoff and roll my eyes.
Who can we get that’s better than Romo? Better yet, who is better than Romo?
Ok, lets say: Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, Philip Rivers, and Kurt Warner are better.
If anybody says Eli Manning or Ben Roethlisberger are better because they have rings do not have any idea of how average-good passers they are while Tony Romo routinely throws for 300 yards.
Kurt Warner is retired. Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, and Drew Brees are staying where they are without question for now.
Philip Rivers and Aaron Rodgers are unlikely going anywhere barring some scandal or them demanding a trade.
Face it people. Tony’s the best we got. He may not have a ring, but we as fans need to give him time.
This team was sorting out its kinks when he started here, and now the first year where we actually look like a Cowboys team of the past, we win a playoff game.
You got to win a playoff game before you win the Super Bowl.
Yeah, we did lose to the Vikings the next week, but I don’t think the 85 Bears could’ve knocked Favre off his rhythm that day. They just had our number and it happens.
‘Next time, we’ll have their number’ is the kind of attitude I need to see more off. How can anyone say that Tony Romo is a bad quarterback when he threw for nearly three times as many touchdowns as he did interceptions?
I guess most people don’t know how to judge a quarterback. They really don’t.
These things take time. It took the Saints time, it took the Colts time, it even took the Patriots time.
I applaud those who still stand behind Tony, but there are several who think that firing someone is the only solution and not try, try again like the saying goes.
Sit down and watch a movie or read some books because we have to wait a while for next year, and it may not happen then either.
It may never happen. I don’t want to think like that, but it may never happen.
But there’s a chance though.
We get rid of Tony Romo for some nobody and there is no chance period.
Story is also featured here
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
65 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Some people
will never get on side with Tony. It’s the nature of sports. No matter what he does or what the numbers show he will have his flaws and those will be the things noted. The numbers show that he is a winning quarterback. Most on this site have readily accepted that for some time, others have taken longer. Even Tex has said nice things. As for the others, I hope they will come around but know there will always be different opinions. I was in a discussion with some Cowboy fans that didn’t believe Aikman was as good as most think. You can believe them or you lyeing eyes.
At the time
I wasn’t a huge Aikman fan. Can’t explain why. I was probably a little spoiled and upset that he single-handedly made Merton Hanks a ProBowler. Late in his career, when he carried the team, I really saw his value.
your close friend obviously knows nothing about football
because anyone with even the slightest knowledge of the game knows Romo is one of the best qbs in the game and those don’t grow on trees.
Nevetheless, you will have Romo haters, it’s inevitable and sad when they’re also Cowboys fans.
In Romo we Trust
+1
Romo is in the top tier QBs, I can’t say he is elite just yet but I have no doubts that he will get there and win the Cowboys a few rings
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 15, 2010 6:54 PM CST up reply actions
+2
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 15, 2010 9:50 PM CST up reply actions
I remember when people were calling for
Danny White to replace Roger and Morton to replace Dandy Don. Nothing ever changes everything remains the same. I think some fans would like to see the whole roster turn over every season, as dumb as that is.
I was waiting for you to chime in Terry...
"The Most Dangerous Man in the world is the one with nothing to lose"
by SaratogaRacing on Feb 16, 2010 11:48 AM CST up reply actions
I haven't heard anyone saying they want Romo gone in the past few months.
Except maybe Tex.
by beautifultyrant on Feb 15, 2010 4:19 PM CST reply actions
Me Either
I’m wondering why people are arguing over what is an uncontroversial position. I was critical of Romo last year, but I never called for his replacement.
So there’s one person out there who thinks Romo should go, do we really care what she thinks?
It's Sad
because it actually is wider spread than just one person….And it is a huge range of people too…From old timer(I say this cuz I am 24 and only been a fan since my toddler days) fans who say Romo is not Roger, Don or Aikman, to new fans and bandwagon jumpers who just are asinine and have no idea about anything and apparently werent here for Cunningham, Wright, Stoener, Carter, Leaf, Stoener, Hutchinson, Carter, Hutchinson, Testaverde, Henson, Bledsoe…That is a sad list. And to people in the middle that call themselves fans, yet only watch the ESPN trash. People are just not intelligent when it comes to their Romo bashing…And it is only worse for non-Cowboy fans.
Romo is a fixture on this team for a long time and that is 109% the way it should be. ;)
I think we get kind of spoiled by the knowledgable fans here on BTB
Out in the real world, there are Cowboys “fans” who think Romo sucks and that we’ll go nowhere with him as our QB. I put fans in quotation marks because these are the people who only think about the Cowboys when it is football season and they happen to see a game on. It’s actually pretty pathetic; if you don’t know what you are talking about, you should keep your mouth shut.
"The last time the Eagles visited Cowboys Stadium, they were spitting on the star. This time they left Cowboys Stadium pissing their pants."- Mike "Fish" Fisher
I've stuck with Romo through thick and thin
Including the very thin 2008 offseason. And I’m very happy I did, because the guy rewarded me in ‘09 with his stellar performance. That Romo can lead Dallas to a Super Bowl title. I’m sure there will be bashers even when/if he does!
2009 Dallas Cowboys: better than the Philadelphia Eagles
2009 New York Jets: my super early trendy Super Bowl XLV pick; oh yeah, also better than the Dolphins
2009-2010 Dallas Mavericks: 57-25 LOVING THE TRADE!
2009 offseason after the 2008 season
Kind of a murky way of putting it…
2009 Dallas Cowboys: better than the Philadelphia Eagles
2009 New York Jets: my super early trendy Super Bowl XLV pick; oh yeah, also better than the Dolphins
2009-2010 Dallas Mavericks: 57-25 LOVING THE TRADE!
Thank you.
My sentiments exactly. I’m sick of hearing Cowboy and non-Cowboy fans saying that Tony Romo is the problem with the Cowboys. He’s not the problem, he’s the solution. Tony Romo is an elite QB, and if the Cowboys win a Super Bowl in the near future, he will be the one to lead them there.
Even when Romo wasn't playing as well as he is now, not many people wanted him gone.
Most people just wanted him to play better. He played very well last season, and I still want him to play better.
by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 15, 2010 7:49 PM CST reply actions
I think you could take your argument even further.
You say Romo is a top 10 qb, well I would say that he is a top 3 qb.
I dont know how you can rate Rodgers ahead of him. The only knock on Romo I can see is that he doesn’t win the big games (something that I dont agree with but thats another matter). In his first season starting Rodgers went 6-10, winning 7 fewer games than did Romo. This year he made the wildcard round and promptly lost. So tell me, what has Rodgers accomplished that Romo has not?
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
Top 3?
I think more like top 5, and he would be number 5. Brees, Rivers, Brady, and Manning are all better in my opinion. Rodgers is just as good and possibly better. Roethlisberger and McNabb are arguably as good or better.
What has Rodgers accomplished? A higher rating and only one less playoff win with less supporting talent.
by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 16, 2010 7:15 AM CST up reply actions
Less supporting talent?
Brett Farve took that team to a 13-3 record and the conference final in 2007. The next year Rodgers takes over and wins 6 games? The packers are a talented team, but Rodgers is over rated.
Brady is past it, and Roethlisberger is only considered elite because of his rings, which the defence were responsible for winning. He had a passer rating in the 20s in his first Superbowl.
In my opinion the four best quarterbacks in the game are Manning, Brees, Romo and Rivers. In that order.
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 16, 2010 7:55 AM CST up reply actions
The Packers have less talent than the Cowboys.
Our running backs are better, our line is better, our TEs are better, our top WR is better. They have a better #2 WR. Wow. Defenses are about equal; they are number 2 in yardage, we’re number 2 in scoring.
Brady is past it? He was #9 in QB rating last year, right behind Romo at #8, and that’s returning from a major injury. And there’s the whole 3 Super Bowl rings.
Roethlisberger was rated higher than Romo last year, on top of his rings. His career rating isn’t far behind Romo’s, and he didn’t have the luxury of not being good enough to get on the field for his first 3 years.
Rivers has a higher career rating than Romo, a higher rating the past 2 seasons, and has won more playoff games.
by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 16, 2010 4:20 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think rodgers has less supporting talent
Their receivers are better than ours. They don’t have witten of course. Rodgers holds onto the ball for quite a long time too, not all those sacks are due to the line.
Brady didn’t play too great this year and he was an outright disaster in the playoffs, but he probably deserves another year at the top of rankings.
Brees, Peyton are obviously better than Romo.
Rivers looks better, but what has he won? His playoff resume is similar to romo’s – playing well, but not great, whch he needed to play. He plays in a horrid division, which helps his stats and helps him get to the playoffs…I’m not convinced hes significantly better.
McNabb is not better, hasn’t been since romo started for us. The guy had a ridiculous amount of talent last year and came up way short. Give the Eagles a qb who can hit his blazing wrs over the middle and they are a dangerous team.Instead, they have a guy who can throw a pretty deep ball and is inconsistant otherwise.
I think Eli deserves mention. He was very good last year considering he was hurt and he keeps improving year by year. I think hes pretty close to that top 5 level.
Jennings isn't better than Austin.
So their number 2-4 receivers are better than ours, but our RBs, TEs, and OL are all better than theirs.
Brady had a 96.2 QB rating this year and led his team to 10-6 and a home playoff game.
Rivers has won more playoff games than Romo in the same number of years as a starter and has a higher career rating and rating each of the past 2 seasons.
McNabb has had a great career and has more playoff wins since Romo has been a starter than Romo does. The Eagles have about the same amount of talent as the Cowboys.
by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 16, 2010 4:28 PM CST up reply actions
thats debatable
I think jennings is a pretty darn good receiver and tends to do a better job getting separation than Austin. Austin is stronger at catching the ball when its contested, but Jennings is more proven imo.
Brady had a good year, but he wasn’t the normal tom brady. He had quite a few poor games this year and those stats are really buffered by two games of near perfect ratings. He was nowhere NEAR as good as he was in 07 and the years prior to that. I said he should be kept at the top of any list because hes an all time great and it often takes longer than a year to recover from knee injuries, but Brady was NOT an elite qb last year. He was absolutely in the same boat as Romo (as was everyone except Manning and Brees)
Rivers is 2-4 in the playoffs (I’m not counting that colts game where volek led them down the field for the win). Romo is 1-3. Neither have upped their games come playoff time like they needed to, both are good-great regular season qbs, I think they frankly have to be viewed similarly. Watching that game against SD, I was not very impressed, and honestly I rarely am although I will admit 60% of his games that I’ve seen are playoff games (which he hasn’t played superb in).
Do you watch McNabb? Sure I’ll take him over the middling teams or sub 500 teams that he can totally light up. But when a games close and hes played poorly in a half, he continues to play poorly. The guy is consistently innacurate and impossible to rely on in tight games. The Eagles lose one or two games a year (Oakland, Cincinatti, etc) that imo rest almost ENTIRELY on McNabb’s shoulders for not being able to lead an offense to over 13 points against a shotty defenses.
And with Celek (who I think as a receiving option was probably better than witten last year), Jackson (a guy who imo could have an extra 400 or so yards if McNabb could just complete easy passes over the middle), and Maclin (better than our #2 for sure), he has a ton of weapons.Their line (before they lost jackson) was better in pass protection than ours as well.
Here's my long winded take.
I have no qualms with saying Rivers is better than Romo. Then again I thought Rivers would have multiple Super Bowl titles before Brees had one Super Bowl appearance on his resume, so what do I know?
That being said I’d go as far to say that it’s downright ignorant to suggest Rivers has accrued any more big game credibility than Romo because of a couple of wild card round wins. The facts are that the Chargers were the best team in the league in ’06 when they lost their cool and blew it against the Patriots in their playoff opener. That was a Patriots team that they were far superior to; no doubt about it. Now I’ll grant you Rivers wasn’t the only one doing stupid stuff in that game; penalties, muffed punts where instead of falling on the ball the return man tries to pick up the ball only to fumble it again, INT’s where the defender gets stripped by the 6th-string receiver. But Rivers played a wholly mediocre game himself.
Then there was last month where once again the Chargers went one-and-done despite being the hottest team in the league by a mile. Rivers was totally stymied.
At this point in Rivers’ playoff career, his playoff losses are far more damning than his playoff victories are vindicating. I’m missing out on the signature performance he’s had in the playoffs that makes him a great "big game QB." To the fact that Rivers has two head-to-head victories over Peyton the Great, I say Jay Fiedler and Chad Pennington also hold playoff victories over Manning. Or to put it another way, "so what?" Rivers has blown as many golden opportunities with arguably much more talented teams as Romo has had at his disposal.
Next up, the guy whose career is head and shoulders above everybody else’s……
The more times Peyton Manning comes up short in the postseason the greater Brady looks. Romo certainly doesn’t belong in the same discussion with Brady but who does? But are Brady’s best times far behind him? Has he entered the twilight of his career? I mean Brady did just have the worst game of his playoff career so once again even an all-time great clutch QB can have a stinker. Also consider that the pair of Joe Flacco and Mark Sanchez has four more playoff victories on their resume than Brady and Eli have since the latter pair’s classic Super Bowl showdown. Food for thought?
Aaron Rodgers is the most promising and intriguing QB going today as I think he’s in prime position to be the very best in the league. He’s as nimble in the pocket as Romo and in terms of pure arm strength he’s right at the top too. This may be blasphemy but right now I believe I’d trust him over RoboQB Peyton to get it done when it actually matters. Brady’s a tougher call because who knows what that injury took out of him in terms of not only composure but his mechanics. So there’s no shame in saying Rodgers is better than Romo because Rodgers is primed to be the best QB in the league for a while.
As for Peyton the Great, I guess the fact that he dismantled a great Jets defense absolves him of any blame for totally getting neutralized by a masterful Greg Williams game plan. Before I even get started, let me say that I’m not overreacting to Porter’s cold blooded assassination of poor old Peyton.
Okay….Okay….You got me there.
I’d be lying if I tried to pretend like my immediate reaction wasn’t to crap on Peyton for throwing the game-sealing pick. However, the fact is that Tracy Porter made a hell of a play on the ball. Just like the five times (in two games) Ty Law made a hell of a jump or read on the ball against Peyton Manning in the playoffs. Right?
But enough about all the great players who make great plays on the very same plays where poor Peyton is just plain unlucky. (Fun fact, Peytonites: Ed Reed has picked off Peyton three times in the playoffs, also in only two games.)
Seriously, even though stuff like that always seems to happen to Peyton in the playoffs, I think Porter’s pick was more of an all-time great play on his part than a boneheaded throw on Peyton’s. And Reggie Wayne definitely deserves his fair share of the blame on that play too. It’s not just that throw, though. The whole game I never felt like the Saints were doing anything that extraordinary to stop the Colts. It felt more like they were more than happy to give Peyton a bunch of hollow passing yards between the 20’s but that Peyton just couldn’t find the throws that mattered. It felt like after the Colts went up 10-0 they put it in cruise control expecting the big plays to come to them instead of going out and making the actual plays their damned selves.
If you can get past the fact that Garcon screwed Peyton on what would’ve been a long TD pass midway through the 2nd quarter; aside from that, Peyton was held out of the end zone for the past 45 minutes. Yes, you read that right. The Colts’ TD drive in the 3rd quarter was all about the Saints daring the Colts to run the ball right at them and the Colts doing just that so I can’t pretend that Peyton was a major factor on that TD drive.
I just can’t pretend Peyton Manning is this all-time great big game QB when Greg Williams who has never been hailed as any kind of defensive guru neutralized Manning with what was a very average middle of the pack Saints defense, without the benefit of turnovers for most of the game. The worst part of it all: I knew, absolutely knew the Colts were screwed as soon as I saw Peyton on the sideline giving his linemen the "pep talk." Nobody rallies the troops like Peyton the Great; no light-hearted John Candy jokes from this sulking stick in the mud.
Another thing:
How come nobody ever points out Peyton Manning’s been surrounded by some pretty damn good talent in Indy for the better part of a decade? For example, I posit that all of those harshly criticized Colts defenses weren’t any worse than a Saints defense that gave up 28 points, a 300-yard passer and a 100-rusher to a team that turned the ball over five times in the NFC Title Game. Or am I wrong in how talented the Colts roster has been? I dare somebody to tell me all about all the Super Bowls Peyton Manning would’ve lead these Cowboys teams from this last decade to. Anybody? Bawk bawk bawk. Chickens.
Drew Brees is certainly on top of the world right now and rightfully so. Hey, I say he can be discussed as a surefire HOF-er immediately if people are willing to so easily overlook that gulf in Kurt Warner’s career where he stunk on toast. But did Drew Brees thoroughly outplay Brett Favre or Peyton Manning? No. What Brees did do was play totally mistake-free and execute the QB as point guard surgical style of play to a tee.
Finally, I have to ask this. As injury-prone as McNabb is, it’s still reasonable that he’s got as many as three solid years left as a starting NFL QB left in him. If you think McNabb’s many more playoff wins make him such a clutch big game QB, would you trade Romo straight up for him?
Romo’s the guy. He’ll be the guy for the foreseeable future. He has in fact proved that he is not allergic to winning playoff games. The Romo clan isn’t cursed by gypsies. No, he doesn’t belong in the discussion of very best QB until he at least plays in a Super Bowl. Period. But he isn’t this wart that needs to be excised from the franchise either. Besides that, nobody’s got this firm grasp on the whole big game QB thing that they think they do. Case in point: Peyton Manning doesn’t belong in the same discussion as Brady, Warner, or even Roethlisberger in terms of all-time great big game QB’s. Sorry, he doesn’t. I know your little Colon Coward radio show will tell you he does. He doesn’t.
If any QB in the NFC East has shown they’re simply not going to lead their franchise to a Super Bowl, it’s McNabb. Romo’s one of the hand full of franchise QB’s in the league and besides there’s no QB the Cowboys could magically trade for straight up that would be an upgrade over Romo. But such is life in Cowboys Nation. If the Cowboys field a legitimate contender, the fanatics will always convince themselves the Cowboys are far and away the most talented team in the league and if they don’t win it all it’s that goofy goofball goober of a QB’s fault.
(By the way, Baked, none of that rambling about delusional fans was aimed at you. I was just generalizing You always bring the goods even if I think you tend to make the topic of QB seem a little more cut and dry than it really is.)
All fair points.
I do want to emphasize that I am firmly in Romo’s corner after this past season, and felt like he improved somewhat. I just don’t think he’s at top 3 yet, and I think there are several guys where a fair argument can be made that they are as good or better than Romo.
Personally, I think that Brees, Manning, and Brady are a clear top 3. Everyone says Brady had such a bad season, but his team was 10-6, he was the number 9 rated passer, 1 point behind Romo, and as you pointed out, he and lots of top QBs have had bad playoff games, including Romo. And then there’s his obvious success record. Oh, I guess you have to stick Favre in there somewhere, too. I wouldn’t trade for him due to age, but you can’t really argue that he wasn’t better last year than Romo.I think the 4 Rs, Romo, Rivers, Rodgers, and Roethlisberger, are all about equal. So that makes Romo somewhere between 5 and 9 in my mind. Exact placement varies depending on when you ask me. I think those 9 guys are your top tier, with the first 4 in elite status.
by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 19, 2010 9:15 AM CST up reply actions
Between 5 and 8, sorry. Math is hard. But that’s the top 25% of the QBs in my opinion. Other than Favre, due to age, I’d be equally happy with any of them running the team as I am with Romo.
by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 19, 2010 9:18 AM CST up reply actions
Yeah, I kind of intentionally left out Favre due to the possibility of him not being back.
In some ways, he had the best year of his career last season. Even I guess we should all expect him back in purple and gold.
Romo is good
I actually would take him for Minnesota in a heartbeat and trade heavily to do it. I think he’s a fundementally good QB, who this year found a receiver who was good enough to work with him. I think if you get another solid threat for him to throw to you’ll see if he’s a top five QB or not. It will be interesting to see how he does his check downs when he’s got a couple of targets out there (not that Whitten and Austin aren’t great receivers)
People who state he’s not good or a choke artist aren’t being rational. Only one person per year is completely free of the choke stigmata. There are 32 teams out there. I would say that 27 of them would be eager to have Romo take the reigns. Hell I’m jealous as hell of you guys you picked up a great QB for free and have him working your offense for a long time to come. After Favre finishes Minny is pretty hosed.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
You said you heard something out of "her" mouth.
I’ve noticed this as well. For some reason, Romo is not garnishing the female vote. I don’t know why but I believe it to be beyond football. Maybe the way he ditched Jessica or Carrie Givesmewood.. Don’t know why, I just think it’s beyond football. There’s no logic to the argument, just emotion.
"The greatest test of courage on earth is to bear defeat without losing heart."
I’m a female and I constantly defend Romo to other people. Mostly it is to fans of other teams and their just hating, but I love Romo. I would put him on par with Rodgers and Rivers, but ahead of Eli Manning.
Have you had to defend him to any female Cowboy fans?
This is where the phenomena occurs to me. They can’t pinpoint it but there’s something they “just don’t like” about him. I don’t think it has anything to do with football either.
"The greatest test of courage on earth is to bear defeat without losing heart."
Some perspective on Tony Romo
Continuing with what James Williamson was saying in this article:
A) Tony Romo is having a career that hopefully when it is all said and done will be hall of fame worthy and filled with a few rings. According to www.pro-football-reference.com, Tony Romo’s career QB Rating is 95.6 .
B) On a related note, if I told you that his career QB Rating is better than the following QBs (Contemporaries in Bold) wouldn’t most if not all of you call me crazy:
Peyton Manning (95.2),
Kurt Warner (93.7),
Tom Brady (93.3),
Joe Montana (92.3),
Drew Brees (91.9),
Ben Roethlisberger (91.7),
Brett Favre (86.6),
Donovan McNabb (86.5)
Dan Marino (86.4),
Roger Staubach (83.4),
Troy Aikman (81.6),
Bart Starr (80.5),
John Elway (79.9),
Eli Manning (79.2)
—>The point I’m trying to make is that Tony Romo is in good company.
C) The other day I was going over Romo’s career starts (without having to look at the internet) and I realized he is a big game winner, even though he had some hick ups late in the season and in his first two playoff starts. Here is Romo’s record against teams/QB’s who won the Super Bowl since he became the starter in mid 2006:
2006: He beat Peyton Manning, the Colts win the Super Bowl.
2007: He went 2-1 against Eli Manning, the Giants win the Super Bowl.
2008: He lost to Ben Roethlisberger, Steelers win the Super Bowl.
2009: He beat Drew Brees, Saints win the Super Bowl.
—>Essentially, Tony Romo has gone 4-2 in six starts against teams that ultimately won the Lombardi Trophy in the season he played them.
D) Comparing Peyton Manning to Tony Romo:
Peyton Manning lost his first 3 playoff starts and had two losing seasons in his first 6 years as a QB in the NFL. Peyton Manning did not win a playoff game until his 6th season. Peyton Manning did not win a Super Bowl until his 9th season. In his first 6 seasons Peyton Manning’s QB rating each season was (71.2, 90.7, 94.7, 84.1, 88.8, 99.0).
Tony Romo has never had a losing season, and has led the Cowboys to the playoffs 3 times in his first 3 1/2 seasons as a starting QB. Tony Romo won his playoff game in his 3rd full season as a starter. From 2006-2009 Tony Romo’s QB rating each season is (95.1, 97.4, 91.4, 97.6). If you look at Tony Romo’s stats, he has yet to have a season where his QB rating was below 91.4 .
—>I make this comparison to show the sky is the limit for Tony Romo, and that if we remain patient we just might get rewarded with Super Bowl title.
"Oh I would have said something to Buddy but he didn't stand on the field long enough, he put his BIG FAT REAR END into the dressing room!"---Jimmy Johson, November 23, 1989.
and Romo has the 4th highest QB rating in league history
great stats
going into this season, i could understand some doubt about Romo, but this season we saw all the improvements we were hoping to see in ball security, decision making, etc. and he played extremely well and took a big step forward in his maturity as a QB.
frankly anyone who at this point thinks we would be better off without him is just clueless! lol
4th highest in history, but never higher than 5th in a season.
And 8th the past 2 seasons. Just for the sake of argument.
by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 16, 2010 7:01 AM CST up reply actions
Just a quick note on Romo's career rating.
Every single one of those QBs above has played at least 2 full seasons longer than Romo. Most of the retired guys had years where they had some decline as they got older, and most of the players above started earlier in their careers and therefore had growing years as well. Romo had the benefit of not being good enough to get on the field and was able to watch and learn for 3 years. Compare him to other QBs that have had a similar opportunity like Rodgers, Rivers, and Steve Young.
That said, I’m not sure who everyone is arguing with here. Very, very few people are saying that they want Romo gone. I think that if a clearly better alternative at any position is available, people want to upgrade, but there are rarely better alternatives at QB.
by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 16, 2010 6:57 AM CST up reply actions
Amen, bro.
"The Most Dangerous Man in the world is the one with nothing to lose"
by SaratogaRacing on Feb 16, 2010 11:50 AM CST up reply actions
I think people have unrealistic ideas for the Cowboys.
I’m not sure why but Texas is a hard state to play football in. Every year they want a ring, Every year… So when they don’t get it the blame gets cast. Honestly the first year he started for you, I was blown away by him hell I had him on my fantasy team and he took me to the semi’s in it.. Hrm correlations..
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Yeah. I don't get it either
I live in Texas and there is a tremendous pride/arrogance that is almost instilled at birth. Because Texas was once its own country the people here feel that Texas is better and if we are better, then our sports teams are better.
I never was that hardcore, but I truly believe Texas is a great place to live and the people here are great… except for the illegals and criminals of course.
Tony is a great guy and I truly believe that the Super Bowl is ahead for him.
by James Williamson on Feb 22, 2010 4:11 PM CST up reply actions
I agree with you
And I think he has the same potential that Rodgers and Rivers do. The sky is the limit.
I do remember growing up in Texas for a bit, it was the only state that in grade school they start indoctrinating you into beleiving that this state is the best.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
I just think fans perceptions of an NFL qb is a really strange phenomenon
There are many Cowboys fans who don’t like Romo and I’ll venture to say they wouldn’t like him even if the Cowboys won a few SBs with him as qb. This also happens with other teams as well. I live in western Pa and I’m really surprised how many Steelers don’t like Roethlisberger, they think he’s overrated and would want another qb. It’s a lot more than you think. I find this very amazing considering he lead them to 2 SB titles in the last 5 years.
I guess there is something about the qb where fans either love or hate him. Really strange phenomenon indeed.
In Romo we Trust
and lets not forget McNabb
I don’t think more than 60% of their fan base has ever liked him, which is amazing cause from 99-04 he was flat out terrific for them.
If fans feel the team is good enough to win the SB
and they don’t, it seems as though the qb is always to blame even though almost always the opposite is true. It’s usually the qb who is the main reason why they’re good to begin with.
Cowboys were mediocre and had absolutely no chance of ever succeeding in the playoffs until #9 took over under center in 2006 and since then, we’ve at least always had a shot. To me, thats a sign of a great qb, because only one team can win the SB every year.
In Romo we Trust
I Agree
I fully agree with you. Romo is a great QB, and that loss to the Vikings was definitely not his fault. To that loss I say, “Where was the O-line?,” he barely got ,“Hike,” out of his mouth before there was a lineman in his face. He needed to be protected better in that game period. He has also grown a lot this year and will continue to. The team needs some changes sure. They include a stronger O-line and a Grade A FG Kicker. But those changes do not include a new QB.
I have loved Romo being at the helm
since he first started. The numbers speak volumes for him and the good certainly out-weighs the bad. He is the franchise quarterback and as soon as the media starts acknowledging his assets to the Cowboys as well as the NFL, things will change. There will always be detractors and skeptics but for those who watch him play week after week and year after year, we see the maturation of an All-Pro QB who I believe will be a Superbowl winning QB by the time he’s done. Just hold on and enjoy the show from thefront seat—things are getting good for Cowboys fans again!
So....
I guess reading through the comments… who with any sense wants him gone?
John McClain: Welcome to the party, pal!
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Feb 17, 2010 7:52 AM CST reply actions
I want Romo gone because....
I look forward to another decade of misery, coupled with drinking myself stupid. I’m a sick SOB in that way.
Most times I meet a “Cowboys” fan who says they want Romo gone, I take a deep breath, tell them it was nice meeting them, and go on about my way. ‘Cause I don’t have the time, nor patience, to deal with morons.
Just like we'd love to see you guys roll the dice on Kolb...
That McNabb guy sucks… Has for years. :P
Actually, I don't want any part of Kolb. I think he's going to be a good one for the Eagles.
I think McNabb is now worse than what Kolb will become. Which means McNabb should still start, but Kolb should be option 1A if he goes in the tank.
I realize many people are high on Kolb's talent and potential....
But I was more alluding to the ridiculous notion that Philly should can a great QB, for a relative unknown.
McNabb may be the best Philly QB of all time. So if they want to get rid of him and go with Kolb, be my guest. I highly doubt Kolb will end up being a better QB than McNabb.
Listen, there are people dumb enough to want him gone because of the
way he smiles. Don’t take it seriously; I’ve been a fan of his through thick and thin, and I know that kind of silliness doesn’t bother me. He’s one of the most playmaking, exciting QBs in the league.
I, subjectively, blame your friend's attitude on a world desiring instant gratification:
haven’t got a Ring? Upgrade the QB. Time to change the oil? Upgrade the car.
If she’s not your girlfriend or fiance, it’s not too late to avoid a life of misery.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
She doesn't watch a lot of football lately. Poor college student
She isn’t an idiot for it. Once I explained his stats for this season, she understood, but she was the latest of a lot of people including guys who watch sports. So, I decided to write this and tell them they are wrong.
by James Williamson on Feb 18, 2010 1:07 PM CST up reply actions
These are the same people
that wanted us to draft Brady Quinn in ‘07. Just ignore them, they don’t know what they are talking about.

by 




















