Cowboys Draft '10, Part Six: Receivers Are Hard to Grade. Can Dallas Grade Them?
We conclude our series on the wide receiver position with two pieces on the Cowboys' success scouting the position of maximum risk.
In '07, I wrote a series for my old site on "bust factors," which examined the rate at which first-round picks succeeded and failed, by position.
The most surprising finding was that wide receiver, by far, was the riskiest position. The bust factor for 1st round WRs from '97 through '06 was 51%, and stayed around 50% for 2nd rounders. Amazingly, wide receiver remains the most-picked offense position, by far. Teams cannot help going for the big splash at wideout. The Lions former GM Matt Millen could not resist their siren song, and picked four of them in the top ten between 2003 and 2007. He ran the Lions ship onto the rocks and sent his management career to the briny deep when their production followed the bust-factor predictions. Charles Rogers and Mike WIlliams are out of football. Roy WIlliams now plays for Dallas. Only Calvin Johnson remains in Detroit.
The Cowboys have shied away from high receiver picks. Antonio Bryant was their only selection in the top three rounds this past decade. That said, they've been looking at receiver for some time, and the lack of picks has as much to do with bad luck as any aversion to the position.
In 2003 they had Andre Johnson on their short list for the 5th overall pick and went with Terence Newman when Houston snagged Johnson with the 3rd pick.
In 2007 they had three receivers high on their wish list -- LSU's Dwayne Bowe, Tennessee's Robert Meachem and USC's Steve Smith. They passed on the first two when they accepted Cleveland's 2nd and '08 1st rounder in the Brady Quinn deal. When Dallas hopped back up to 26, it had a choice between Meachem and Anthony Spencer. Meachem has turned into a decent player for New Orleans but it appears Dallas made the right decision picking the linebacker.
The Cowboys had their WR hopes deflated in the 2nd when the Giants took Smith one pick ahead of them. The Cowboys subsequently traded out of the round. Smith has become a Cowboys tormentor in his short career.
'08 had a deep crop which lacked glamorous, four-tool 1st rounders. Not one receiver was selected in the 1st. The Cowboys eyed Virginia Tech's Eddie Royal and Indiana's James Hardy got some pre-draft attention, but they never came within Dallas' grasp. From the time Mike Jenkins was picked at 25 to the time Martellus Bennett was selected at 61 ten receivers flew off the board. Hardy and Royal were picked back-to-back at 41 and 42.
What's important is that nearly all of the Cowboys short listers have become solid to outstanding receivers. This suggests the team knows how to identify the good prospects among the dross. Landing them is another story.
This year is shaping up a lot like '08 in my eyes. Dez Bryant is a sure-fire first rounder but after that, we're looking at a lot of prospects with second round grades. Notice, I'm not saying guys who will be drafted in the 2nd round exclusively -- some may sneak into the back end of the first, where Dallas picks -- but guys with 2nd round grades. What does this mean? I'll explain Monday, when I go over the construction of the draft boards.
For now, take a look at the names who are clear Cowboys' players of interest, based on Senior Bowl interviews. Cincinnati's Mardy Gilyard likely will get a 2nd round grade. Dallas also spoke to Georgia Tech monster Demaryius Thomas, a 6'3" 229 pounder who fits the big receiver profile. He looked like a 2nd to 3rd rounder, though he will miss the Combine after breaking his foot. If the Cowboys feel they have good tape and intelligence on him, he may represent good value in the 3rd or even 4th now. Clemson lightning bug Jacoby Ford also looks like a middle round prospect.
These are by no means the only receivers on the Cowboys' radar, but they do fit the profiles we laid out earlier this week. Don't neglect data that's hiding in plain view.
Friday mid-day: I revisit the WR bust factors, with a big assist from OneCoolCustomer, who has updated the numbers from '06 to '09.
Monday: Build a board like the pros.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
10:27 EST
Looks like you hit the sauce pretty thoroughly on a Thursday evening. Probably knocking back some appletinis or dry vermouth while enjoying some of the men’s long program ice dancing?
Wow
Haha… that’s funny.
John McClain: Welcome to the party, pal!
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Feb 19, 2010 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
1st rd talent
Im not sure there will be good value at WR at 27. You might be able to justify Tate(personally not a fan), but everyone other than Bryant seems like a reach.
According to the experts there will be very good talent at 27
Charlie Casserly was on the NFL Network this week saying this will be the deepest and most talented first rd since 1983 when several HOF players were selected in that first rd.
In Romo we Trust
So is this the year we see the Cowboys go OL in 1st rd? Might be able to get someone to come in and start.. or atleast push a current starter. Not a sexy pick, but could get some good value.
I think so as there are 7-8 really good prospects this year
I doubt we’ll get anybody who will come in and start, but we don’t need that, our starters are set for at least one more year on the OL.
In Romo we Trust
I stated in a comment a while back
That Dexter McCluster is the guy I’ve wanted. Any fan of SEC football has seen what this guy can do to some of the fastest defenses in college. I’m not sure if I’m willing to take him in the first, but I’d trade up in the second too.
Michael Irvin to Keyshawn Johnson "I know where me and Rice belong on the top ten receivers of all time list, but who do you have in the bottom 8?"
by markdamack on Feb 18, 2010 9:59 PM CST via mobile reply actions
I know....
I like him, the only thing is he’s really not a true WR… but I dig him too.
John McClain: Welcome to the party, pal!
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Feb 18, 2010 10:24 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah
And he’s real small. Maybe I wouldn’t trade up for him, alot of mocks have him going on the 3rd so maybe we could snatch him up if he falls.
Michael Irvin to Keyshawn Johnson "I know where me and Rice belong on the top ten receivers of all time list, but who do you have in the bottom 8?"
by markdamack on Feb 18, 2010 10:42 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Yep....
I think after the combine he goes in the second.
John McClain: Welcome to the party, pal!
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Feb 18, 2010 11:05 PM CST up reply actions
Im an OMiss fan
and have had the pleasure of watching Dex for several years
he is a rare talent, reminds me of Sproles
also EXTREMELY smart, capable of learning lots of positions and plays with few reps
incredible open field runner but has struggled some with fumbling
i think he could do a lot of things for this team but not sure if we have more pressing needs
There was a scout on the NFL Network who said of McCluster
that he doesn’t think there is any LB or safety in the league that could cover him out of the slot, he’s that fast and quick.
In Romo we Trust
A WR that can't be cover by LBs or Safeties?
Shouldn’t that describe almost everyone at that position?
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 19, 2010 7:40 AM CST up reply actions
True
I’m very high on Dex.
Dreams of him and Felix being on the same field make my giddy, and I am not one to fall in love with draft picks.
John McClain: Welcome to the party, pal!
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Feb 19, 2010 8:30 AM CST up reply actions
Demaryius Thomas
Could be good value in 3rd or 4th. Seems like he could be the type of player we hoped Roy E would be.
Thomas
As a big GT fan, I love Demaryius, but I do personally have some concerns about how he will transition to the pros. Everyone assumes that he wasn’t allowed to flourish with the option offense, but in many cases I think opposing teams had to worry so much about stopping the run that he benefitted from not having as much coverage as he would have otherwise. I will say that I think his size and speed (apparently he ran a 4.38 at Tech) are extremely enticing, I just think he is a very raw prospect that will require time to learn the intricacies (route running in particular) of being a WR.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Feb 18, 2010 11:14 PM CST up reply actions
I like all 3 mentioned in this article
Thomas – Big, productive even though he wasn’t near the top of the totem pole and abuses all corners
Gilyard – Plays big, makes plays when it counts, just watch him against Pitt when they needed to score to win.
Ford – Speed, speed, and more speed. KR/WR combo
Don’t care if we choose any but I’m leaning towards Ford for the KR possibilities.
I wouldn’t be opposed to drafting Thomas and either Ford or Gilyard
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 18, 2010 10:44 PM CST reply actions
I'm about as Homer as it gets but...
…I’d love to see us move up in the third to go after Shipley. Dude is just a Footballer. Plus, I think his pick could possibly sew up 3 needs in Developmental WR, able KR, and threat PR.
by KaceOFbass on Feb 18, 2010 11:58 PM CST via mobile reply actions
WR or OLINE?
To me, you just take who would be the biggest improvement. People act like this is black and white. Sure, Romo can’t throw from the ground. But he’s on the ground less if WR’s get open faster.
Past Cowboy Targets
Raf, I’m curious about your take on the receivers that the Cowboys would’ve taken if the draft cards had fallen a little differently.
It’s easy for me to imagine a team having 20/20 hindsight in describing players they didn’t take. No GM is going to publicly say that he crossed Andre Johnson off his draft board, and not many will confess to trying to trade up for JaMarcus Russell.
When you say that the Cowboys had interest in a receiver, is that sourced contemporaneously or retrospectively?
Thanks!
Did you know what the ccowboys draft board was .......
is that what you are asking?
A quick perusal of updated mocks seems to indicate
WR starts flying off the boards around pick # 40. By pick # 59 theres not many of the solid 2nd tier guys left. As a matter of observation most of the names being floated as the Cowboys first pick are long gone. They probably won’t trade down because there’s more players to go around than the first 26 picks can contain. This year more than others, we could end up with the best player available at 27.
It will be interesting to see how these mock boards change after the combine. If ever there were a great chance of the Cowboys picking up a real player at 27, this would be the year. I like our chances of having an intriguing addition to this roster. We could also see some gems in the lower rounds, including WR. A big trade is possible due to the depth of this draft.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
Pick 52 or so is where the 2nd tier of players finishes
that’s another story for the future.
Damn this is a deep draft.
In considering the Cowboys needs (OL, DE, S, WR, K, and maybe backup RB), it looks as if they will be able to acquire some talented guys no matter if they stand pat at 27 or even trade back.
It would be a bit of a bummer if they traded back, but I wouldn’t mind them have three 2s in this draft, if possible. They could knock out an OL, S, and WR by Friday!
BTB League Consolation Ladder Champ...thought you knew.
I agree
too much quality rookie blood in the water for Jerry not to go into a feeding frenzy. I would also imagine that trades and 2011 picks will be used as bargaining chips.
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 19, 2010 8:48 AM CST up reply actions
+1
I think this a year that both ways would work fine.
John McClain: Welcome to the party, pal!
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Feb 19, 2010 8:52 AM CST up reply actions
Hey OCC, do you know which teams have a ton of picks that might be manuevering much in April?
I think Cleveland does.
BTB League Consolation Ladder Champ...thought you knew.
by Aaron Novinger on Feb 19, 2010 11:21 AM CST up reply actions
Picks by team
Browns: 11
Bills, Dolphins, Rams & Bucs: 9 each
Compensatory picks not announced yet
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 19, 2010 12:23 PM CST up reply actions
Cool, tanks!
BTB League Consolation Ladder Champ...thought you knew.
by Aaron Novinger on Feb 19, 2010 1:57 PM CST up reply actions
Steve Smith
I’m a bit surprised to hear that the Cowboys were interested in him. He’s the type of WR I think this team could use—a smaller, possession guy with solid hands and good speed.
Interesting to think that Scandrick could have been going up against him everyday in practice.
BTB League Consolation Ladder Champ...thought you knew.
by Aaron Novinger on Feb 19, 2010 11:25 AM CST reply actions
After hearing some so called draft experts
on the NFL network say that a lot of O-lineman will go early in this draft, Maybe as many as 5 or 6 in the first 20 picks. If this happens some very good pllayers other than o-lineman are going to fall to Dallas at 27.
Possibly....
but not necessarily.
John McClain: Welcome to the party, pal!
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Feb 19, 2010 9:09 PM CST up reply actions
I'm good with staying at #27 and taking Pouncey
Or a Safety prospect, if the top LT prospects are gone.
The lack of highly rated QB’s, and CB’s is going to benefit the linemen in this years 1st rd I think.
Drago says, "We must break you!"
by APerfectStar on Feb 19, 2010 9:10 PM CST up reply actions
Raf
Are there certain positions you think should be avoided in the early rounds?
My rule of thumb has always been the bigger the role intangible play in success, the more I hope that Dallas doesn’t pick them with a high pick.
In other words, if I can picture myself saying, “Although _________ doesn’t look like a prototypical NFL ________ and is a bit undersized he makes up for it with heart, smarts and moxie” then I try to avoid using first rounders on them.
You can build a team of QB’s, WR’s, RB’s, LB’s etc who fit those sentences.
LT, CB, not so much.
I think the bust rates for certain positions are a function of the mix measurables vs intangibles play in determining success.

by 




















