Will Any NFL Team Adopt the '04 Bruins' Blueprint?

In the spring of 2004 the NHL played its playoff tournament under the threat of a lockout.  The league did not have a salary cap at that time and management was adamant that one was needed to contain player costs.  Team owners threatened to cancel the upcoming season if the players did not accept one.  The owners made good on the threat; there was no '04-'05 NHL season.

Interesting to this history is the behavior of the Boston Bruins.  The B's won their division and finished 2nd in the Eastern Conference that year.  They had a core of players who were due to enter free agency, several of whom were acquired for the playoff drive.  

Rather than hand out several long-term contracts, Boston management gambled that the salary cap, when it eventually came, would be relatively low compared to the '03-'04 team average salary and the Bruins would have their choice of top free-agent talent.  The tactic blew up on them when the new cap turned out to be higher than they expected, and the free agent pool was smaller.  All of the Boston free agents the Bruins chose to ignore signed with other teams and the team stumbled.  It missed the playoffs the first year play resumed and finished last in the division the following year. 

We are in the early stages of CBA jockeying between the owners and the players' association.  It is clear that 2010 will be an uncapped season.  People are focusing on the top end, on whether teams like Daniel Snyder's Redskins, who are always active in free agency, will spend even more.   I'm looking at the downside.  An uncapped year means there is no limit, but also that there is no floor.  Will we see teams in need of rebuilding or who are congenitally tight with player contracts pull a Bruins and let their payrolls plummet?

The current collective bargaining agreement establishes a floor at 75% of the salary cap.  This means that every club must spend at least that much on players, in an effort to maintain competitive balance.  You will always see bad teams in the league, but the CBA ensures you will not see any like baseball's Oakland A's or Kansas City Royals, teams with payrolls a small fraction of those carried by perennial contenders like the Yankees or Red Sox. 

An uncapped year offers that chance.  Would a  team like Tampa Bay, who has the lowest payroll, decide to cut more big contacts and lower its player outlays even further, rather than trying to spend wildly in a free agent market that looks to be thin, given the increased ability of teams to retain potential free agents?  What of a team like Cincinnati?  The Bengals just made the playoffs but are notorious for being tight.  Will they try to add through free agency, or go the other way and lop off some bad deals? 

In fact, I'm wondering if we'll see a wholesale dumping of bad contracts?  Robert Boland wrote in the National Football Post this week that the owners' initial proposal asks for an 18% rollback in player compensation. If the players were to capitulate tomorrow and agree, this would drop the cap to around $105-106 million.

That's not likely to happen.  But a new CBA will come eventually, and if it does lower the cap percentage somewhat, it will put a lot of teams in the '04 Bruins' mindset.  Management will have to calculate where they feel the cap would be, and if they could in fact meet that new target.  If the owners are as hard-core as their NHL counterparts, I doubt we would see too many teams, if any, going crazy when free agency opens in March.  If the objective is to lower overall player outlays, then every front office needs to play the same contracts game. 

If nothing else, the weekend of March 5th should give us some idea of where the future negotiations will go.  If several teams treat the cap as dead and immediately sign so-so players to blue chip deals, the players will feel little pressure to change their position.  If you instead see lots of teams dumping lots of bad deals and one or two puncturing the former cap floor, the owners may indeed have leverage they have not demonstrated in past negotiations.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Blogging The Boys

You must be a member of Blogging The Boys to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Blogging The Boys. You should read them.

Join Blogging The Boys

You must be a member of Blogging The Boys to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Blogging The Boys. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker