Do the Cowboys need to Draft a Receiver Early?
Many would argue that the Cowboys need to draft a wide receiver in the 2nd or 3rd round, some would say the 1st. Do the Cowboys really need to draft a receiver? The knee-jerk reaction would have the Cowboys drafting a receiver early; after all the Giants hit on a receiver last year with Hakeem Nicks (47 receptions, 790 yards, 6 TD) and a couple of drafts ago with Steve Smith. The Eagles hit on a receiver in the 1st round with Jeremy Maclin (56, 77, 4) and DeSean Jackson the year before. The Redskins hit with Devin Thomas… no never mind.
The Cowboys are set at receiver. They have a number one in Austin, a number two in Crayton and Williams combined, and a superior TE in Jason Witten. The slot receiver is in-house already. That would be Kevin Ogletree, and a surprise factor this coming season will be Manuel Johnson. Ogletree is far ahead of Johnson, but don’t count Johnson out. The argument is that the Cowboys need a speedy slot or second receiver that will compliment Austin and that can perform punt return duties. Both Ogletree and Johnson fit that bill just give them plenty of opportunities in training camp and the pre-season. Do the Cowboys really need a rookie to fit that bill? Would any rookie challenge Ogletree or Johnson? According to footballsfuture.com, Dez Bryant, Golden Tate, Damian Williams, Brandon LaFell, and Arrelious Benn are the top five receivers. Although these players could be a number two or eventually and number 1, none fit the bill as a punt returner. What about Mardy Gilyard or Dexter McCluster? Would they beat out Kevin Ogletree? Just give Ogletree and Johnson a shot.
This is what Mel Kiper wrote about Johnson, “Before his injury, Johnson was having an outstanding year. He can accelerate past the cornerback on go routes or take short gainers to pay dirt. He not real big, so Johnson’s probably looking at being a slot guy in the NFL. He has decent toughness and with his speed, he could be a factor in the right system.” That sounds like a speedy slot and return guy to me.
Ogletree definitely flashed some talent more so than Johnson. According to Kiper “Ogletree is a good player who did a nice job coming back from a knee injury. He jumped out on occasion in 2008, but I’m surprised he’s coming out early. He didn’t consistently show that he was ready to be the main receiving option, even at the college level…He certainly flashed some ability in some games but other times looked like a marginal prospect. You’ll roll the dice later in the draft with a guy like Ogletree.” The key is that Ogletree ran a 4.36 at last year’s combine and he showed that he can play and contribute for the Cowboys as third option and returner.
If the Cowboys draft a receiver, it should be in the 6th or 7th round, or maybe not at all. Maybe they should wait for rookie free agents. It’s worked in the past. They Cowboys should invest in OL and FS in this year’s draft. Take the best offensive lineman available in the first three rounds. At least one of them is bound to hit. If the Cowboys solidify the OL, it will give our receivers time to get open, it will give the running backs opportunities to explode through a hole, and it will make the offense unstoppable. The Cowboys just have that much talent at the skill positions. It’s a shame the line can’t hold its weight. For the draft, hold the receivers and pass some guards and tackles.
Works Cited
CBSsports.com
Footballsfuture.com
Mel Kiper Jr’s 2009 Draft Report
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
43 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No
Dallas does not need to draft a WR early. But they will take a WR in this draft. When, I don’t know.
It's fun to do bad things. -Latarian Milton
What happens if Miles Austin goes down?
That is why you need to draft a receiver (although not necessarily in the first round).
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
You have a good point...
But do you really think any of the top five receivers I mentioned could replace Austin? And you could say that for many teams in the league. What if Andre Johnson gets hurt? What if Moss gets hurt? etc. That’s a very bad thought, but Romo would just have to spread the ball around. Like Brees and Manning do.
by beautifultyrant on Feb 20, 2010 4:47 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think that any of them could replace Austin
but I sure as hell think that they would be better complementary receivers to a passing game than Sam Hurd. If Austin goes down, I would at least like another guy with some play-making ability to be available to our offense.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Feb 21, 2010 5:26 AM CST up reply actions
I don't think they would
There is a severe learning curve for receivers so to say a rookie 1st rounder would automatically be better than Sam Hurd is not necessarily true.
In Romo we Trust
a rookie WR isn't going to replace Austin's productivity if he goes down
He won’t even come close. WRs that will be available at 27 will take at least a few years to develop into competent receivers in the NFL.
In Romo we Trust
incorrect Terry...maybe in years past, but not anymore...
Desean Jackson, Jeremey Macklin from Philly are two examples…..Garcion, Collie, Gonzalez from Indy….Percy Harvin, Minn…. and the list goes on. Rookie WRs have shown in the past 3 or 4 years that they can come in right away and start and do really good…Crabtree wouldve been another if he didnt hold out…Dez Bryant and Golden Tate will be the two rookies next year tearing up the league…
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
no, you're incorrect Boyz...again
Jackson and Maclin didn’t come close to Austin’s productivity their rookie seasons, neither did the Indy receivers and neither did Harvin. I’m not saying rookie WRs can’t contribute some, but to say they can match a pro bowler’s numbers simply isn’t true, unless you’re name is Randy Moss.
I’ll bet you anything you want Bryant and Tate don’t come close to Austin’s numbers…..put your money where your mouth is for once.
In Romo we Trust
You just love disagreeing with me dont you....
take at least a few years to develop into competent receivers in the NFL
So Desean Jackson wasn’t competent his rookie year right?…lol….neither was Garcion or Macklin right…what a joke you are Terry…You just dont want to admitt that rookie WR’s can step in and be good players right from the start. The days of WR’s waiting 2 or 3 years to get a shot or riding the pine are over.
BTW. Austin was in the NFL, in a NFL system for over 3 years…..
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
you're the joke Boyz
I never said rookie WRs can’t contribute, I said they can’t become go to #1 WRs their rookie years like you are claiming.
In Romo we Trust
The question had nothing to do whether he could be a pro bowl player his rookie year..
the question was whether a rookie can come in and play at a high level and be a productive player….the answer is YES…those players I mentioned prove it…to say a rookie WR needs 2 or 3 years to be productive is not true, not anymore….If we drafted Golden Tate, I bet you he could step and be a good player as a rookie and also be a very good PR. The folllowing year he could be competing with Ogletree for the #2 spot if RW is not around.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
that wasn't the question
The question was who would replace Austin’s productivity if he got injured, if you don’t believe me go re-read the thread.
There is no way any rookie WR could come in here and replace his production…absoutley no way.
In Romo we Trust
I like the guys you mention that buck the Cowboys' WR stereotype
And they can be had for good value — the Cowboys should look for a WR in rounds 2 – 4. I think it’s a position that should be addressed because injury would leave the WR corps very thin, and we’d want a guy that could contribute sooner rather than later.
Movie Reference
by accidental innuendo on Feb 20, 2010 4:05 PM CST reply actions
Golden Tate is an outstanding punt returner
Golden Tate can believe it's not butter.
We defeinately need a WR.....
too many unknowns at the positon…Hurd is gone, Crayton is old and slow….Ogletree, who I love is still an unknown…RW we know are feelings about. Austin is the only true lock we have..How can WR not be a top priority.. WR is more of a priority than drafting a center or guard right now…
Golden Tate is dangerous as a punt returner, which we REALLY need and is explosive as a WR which we REALLY need…we fill two positions with one pick.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
True
And thinking that it would be hard for him to challenge Ogletree, a WR so talented he had 5 catches all last season is also illogical.
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 23, 2010 7:26 AM CST up reply actions
@labone
I don`t know where you got that from as he didn`t return kicks or punts for the fighting irish. Having said that I rate him as the best receiver in this draft and would love it if we took him in the 1st round.
...Golden Tate was the fighting irish's punt returner
I don’t know where you are getting your info, but his punt/kickoff return skills are part of the reason he is rated so high.
Golden Tate can believe it's not butter.
+1
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Feb 23, 2010 7:26 AM CST up reply actions
Tate definitely returned kicks
I saw him take one back to the house against Pitt this year.
In Romo we Trust
Bryant is out of reach but the rest of the top WR's Dallas might consider
Golden Tate is my fave, and one of the few I’d be excited about seeing Dallas land. It will take the 1st pick to get him.
Benn, D Williams, LaFell all could go in the 1st or 2nd. (I am not a fan of LaFell and I think he’ll drop on draft day)
Gilyard and McCluster round out the wow factor WR’s. They probably will come off the board in the bottom 2nd, top 3rd.
One guy who is a risk, but also talented enough to be included in the group of guys above is Mike Williams from Syracuse. He might be a risk worth going for in the 3rd or 4th rds. Boom or bust type.
Drago says, "We must break you!"
I like Lafell
he had no QB that was even adequate to throw it to him and he still had decent seasons. Him and Benn are both in that boat of not having the best of QBs yet still being pretty productive
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 20, 2010 8:18 PM CST up reply actions
LaFell
Doesn’t have enough speed and drops too many passes for guy who is projected to go in the 1st/2nd rd. He’s big and physical, but I don’t think he’ll add anything to Dallas.
Drago says, "We must break you!"
by APerfectStar on Feb 20, 2010 9:59 PM CST up reply actions
How about Shipley
He will be solid guy right away and he has some star potential. Boys don’t really have a slot receiver like that.
Let it snow- ping-pong balls, from the heavens.
by returnofswagger on Feb 20, 2010 9:16 PM CST up reply actions
I'd put him a notch below Gilyard
Mainly because he’s older (I think he’s already 24) and his injury history. Kind of a risky investment.
Drago says, "We must break you!"
by APerfectStar on Feb 20, 2010 10:04 PM CST up reply actions
I disagree
Shipley is more than adequate as a punt returner and a proven yard stick changer. If he falls to the third round Dallas should pick him-He’s a steal in the third. I believe he will be a viable threat in the NFL for any team.
Here is a sleeper first round receiver
Dexter McCluster. This year’s Percy Harvey who was last year’s Desean Jackson.
He could help the team in a lot of ways.
2009 BTB Fantasy Champ... Deal with it
McCluster won't go in the first
because of his size but I definitely see him as a 2nd rounder.
In Romo we Trust
late 2nd probably...agreed...he is not a first round pick
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
Why draft a receiver? They need to continue to develop Stanback...
oh wait.
by Thehomerpimpson on Feb 21, 2010 2:56 AM CST reply actions
Why use our first pick on a receiver?
It’s only been since Alvin Harper that we have done that. Instead we can trade first round draft picks for the Joey Galloways and RW’s of the league. Great plan. Honestly I’d prefer to take an offensive lineman, safety, or even corner this year but to say receiver with kick/punt return skills isn’t a priority?
by Beuerleincouldhavebeenbetterthentroy on Feb 21, 2010 7:05 AM CST reply actions
This is what Todd Archer from the DMN blog had to say about Manny Johnson as a PR:
“Here’s something to think about too: Manny Johnson. A seventh round pick last year, he did little in camp to impress me but stuck around the practice squad for the year. He looked quicker and faster by the end of the year. And he was returning punts for the scout team. That tells me the coaches are looking at him for different roles, that they like him.”
by beautifultyrant on Feb 21, 2010 4:24 PM CST up reply actions
Not sure about WR, but there is another position that is getting overlooked!
Convince me how a WR would help our offense beat Minnesota or get a TD against San Diego and I will be all for it.
We have talked so much about WR, OL, and S, but there is little talk about trying to find a great FB. Wouldn’t a great FB help solve some of the running problems near the goal line or those 3rd down, 1 yard to go situations?
I know that Toby Gerhart is listed as a running back, but he has the size and speed to be a great fullback, like Moose Johnson was. If he happens to be there in the second round, I’d take this guy in a heartbeat.
Your absolutely correct.
I don’t think we need to draft one, but being that Cricket’s days are likely numbered getting a fullback is not a bad idea. There are a number in this years draft that are late round picks or PFA. It is an area that can and should be improved upon. Moose did a great deal for the Cowboys and that 3rd and 1 situation was all but in the bag when he was in. His protection of his quarterback was another strenghth that is really needed now. With the number of running backs we have I find it difficult to believe the Cowboys would spend a high draft pick on that position when other needs are more pressing.
you are right...
the top fullbacks in this year’s draft are Garret Graham, Rayshawn Jackson, and Manase Tonga.
by beautifultyrant on Feb 21, 2010 3:59 PM CST up reply actions
I would love Jerry to make a move for LeRon McClain...he is a RFA...
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
Isn't McClain more of a runner than a blocker?
by beautifultyrant on Feb 21, 2010 4:02 PM CST up reply actions
McClain was a FB coming out...
He can be both…
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
i would like jacoby ford but actually
i’m on the same page with you, better look for most urgent needs
The Cowboys also need to draft a receiver
because there is in my opinion a nice big hole at KR and PR that we could fill with that guy. I am still a fan of taking a guy like Antonio Brown in the fourth.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by 




















