Top 5 Players Who Could Be Great but aren't doing anything yet
Partly inspired by TK19's "Show Me Players", These are my Top 5 players on the Dallas Cowboys roster, who have the Physical dimensions to dominate at their position but haven't done it. These guys, if they figured it out, could help Dallas field the best team in the NFL.
5. Jason Hatcher, L DE. He was drafted out of Grambling State. When drafted, he fielded a 4.8 40 at 285 lbs, a truely great physical specimen, with 6'6 height. He had 10.5 sacks as a senior and looked like he could be developed in to a formidible defensive linemen. However, he's going in to year 4 now and we're still waiting. Last year, he had the fewest snaps of all DEs at about 320 (Igor had the most at about 520). According to ProFootballReport.com, though, he was the 10th most productive 3-4 DE in the league in those snaps. As a physical marvel, he'd seem to have potential to generate 8 sacks in a year, .5 a game. He's either going to accomplish that this year, or leave with no one even mentioning his exit.
4. Bobby Carpenter, LB. Speed, strength, size he seems like a complete package. Right now we're just happy he's contributing on a regular basis. I for one think he out played the player he replaced, Kevin Burnett, if only because he brough impressive size to Nickle Back role. However, with his speed, if he ever contracted rabbies, he could be blowing FBs up and knocking guards in to QBs. We're still waiting, but he still has this potential. Often when I see running plays, they run right at Bobby, and he ends up pushed back 3 or 4 yards.
3. Martellus Bennett, TE. His physical abilities are staggering. Runs routes like a WR, he's pretty fast, and he's a freaking giant. If he was even half as reliable as Jsaon Witten, Dallas would be fielding 2 of the 5 most dangerous TEs in the NFL. His weakness catching balls last year prevented Dallas from really threatening people with the two TE offense. If Bennett delievered on his excellent physical potential, the two TE offense of Dallas could be the scourge of the NFL.
2. Roy Williams, WR. The Fan Base's reigning punching bag. What do you say about his physical dimensions? He's cut like Jevon Kearse and almost as big. He's fast, strong, he can knock his opponents down. He just never does anything reliably. If he performed at a career peak with Dallas, we're talking 1,300 yards and 12 TDs type of season. He has the physical attributes to be a dominate pressence at WR. We're still waiting. If Roy E Williams lived up to what Jerry traded for him, and what his measurables say are possible, Dallas would be fielding one of the greatest WR combos of all time, between him and Miles Austin. That dou would simply beat up the the great dous from the 70s.
1. Patrick Watkins, S. He's tall, rangy, and quick to accelerate. He crumples people on ST like they were sacks of potatoes. His size, and the area he can cover make him ideally suited to be a lone center fielder. He's as tall as the tallest WR. He's as fast as many of the fastest. He actually has a couple highlights in his career that show his eye popping speed - a fumble return, some great ST tackles. But he seems unable to track the ball in the air. He just doesn't seem to see above the horizon. In an era of airplanes, he only sees the tanks. He would of been a dream in the 80s, just crashing the LOS, looking for the ball carrier. If he could just learn to track balls in the air, he has the physical dimensions to change the way teams evaluate safeties.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
16 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Watkins was my pet cat
a few years ago. I had such high hopes given his measurables. I thought…OMG he will be amazing in Madden! But no, he has to blow and not track a ball in the air. I mean jezz, i can teach my dog to track a frizzbe 60 yards away. Pat can’t see a big brown ball coming right to his face!
Yes to 2 and 3 (if both get their heads on straight could be great)
No to 1 and 4 (Their limitations are and have continued to be self-evident)
I am tempted to say no to Hatcher as well, but I think he falls somewhere in between since he apparently does grade out well by some site’s metrics, but on the other hand, you would think if he really was very good that he would beat out Spears.
I personally can’t wait to see what some of these second year linebackers (the Williamses and Butler) can do with a year of experience in the scheme.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
Jason Williams
So pardon my disposition; why should I listen to a system that never listened to me?
by NICK L on Apr 16, 2010 12:26 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
the reason he isn't on the list
is he is still too new, next year if he doesn’t produce we can put him on this list
by nicholas.rodriguez on Apr 16, 2010 7:07 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm convinced we're going to see him go beast mode in the near future.
I have nothing to base this on aside from what my eyes tell me from watching limited footage of him, but I trust my eyes.
Let the chips fall where they may
I agree
Also based on nothing more than a couple flashes in the pre-season last year. He is by far the quickest of the ILB’s. He could be a devastating blitzer up the middle, or if Wade incorporates him into the 46 defense.
to make the jump to the next level, Odrick said today he needs to work on one area. "Just being more violent overall,'' Odrick said. "Play the game and play it right, violently.''
by APerfectStar on Apr 17, 2010 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions
of all the ones you listed
I think Watkins has the least potential, yeah he is tall, rangy, some speed, but he is not flexible, he can’t read defenses, he is a little stiff and takes wrong angles and is not a good tackler. he peaked in his first year. he is on the decline except for special teams play. watkins never has a chance to be great.
by CowboysFanatic on Apr 16, 2010 12:38 PM CDT reply actions
I disagree about Hatcher, Carp and Watkins ever being great
Hatcher can be good, not great, same with Watkins. Carp will only ever be good with a 4-3 team, never with us.
RW and Bennett do have the necessary talent and skills to be great but I doubt they ever will.
In Romo we Trust
Watkins has been in the league 5 years...
I think what you see is what you get at this point. Be happy he found his niche on special teams and leave it at that.
yep
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Apr 16, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions
I think year 7 or 8 will be his breakout year, much like Roy W. will finally get on the same page as Romo this year
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Sad but true
he is a nice STer but nothing more
by nicholas.rodriguez on Apr 16, 2010 7:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Let me help you you retitle this:
“Top 5 Players Who Could Be Mediocre Starters, But Will Probably Only Get The Chance With Another Team”
I mean, “Great”?
There’s no way any of these guys are going to be “great”.
Just being productive role players is all you can expect.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
Buehler
When he starts performing all the kicking duties, he’ll be an All Pro.
to make the jump to the next level, Odrick said today he needs to work on one area. "Just being more violent overall,'' Odrick said. "Play the game and play it right, violently.''
Hatcher
could be better, not quite “great,” his strength seems to be getting to the passer on passing downs, not quite a complete 3-4 DE. I think he showed more a couple of years back, and that could be because of the snaps being spread around among the all of the D-line.
I’ve given up on Row Williams. Carpenter is OK, but doesn’t seem like he is in the plans for the future. I do think Bennett could be great, especially with his athleticism, going up to get the ball over shorter DBs, etc. His blocking has improved too…but he just hasn’t seemed to get it together.

by 

























