Grading the 2010 NFL Mock Drafts: The Close But No Cigar Awards
Mock drafts - we've debated them passionately, we've questioned their value, we've questioned their author's sanity. Some of them you glanced at and immediately discarded. Others you held up and proclaimed to be the 32 Commandments - like Moses at Mount Sinai.
But there is one thing that all of them have in common: As a predictor of which players are going to which teams, mock drafts aren't particularly accurate. Yet some mockers turned out to be better than others in predicting the first round of the 2010 draft. And perhaps, not unsurprisingly, some of the better known draft experts might actually have their jobs because they’re better than many others at what they do, as we'll see later.
Today we look at some of the mock draftniks we've been following over the last few weeks to see how their predictions turned out, and to hand out the official BTB 'Close But No Cigar' Awards.
The Huddle Report hands out mock draft scores every year and is widely recognized as, in their own words, "the most trusted and longest running such scoring available for NFL mock drafts". Their system is based on correctly predicting the player in the round (1 point) and matching the player with the correct team (3 points).
Simply replicating their method wouldn't be a lot of fun, especially since you can just follow the link and look it up. So today we invent a new method for scoring the mock drafts. Here's how it works:
Each pick can score between 1 and 4 points.
- Player in correct round = 1 point
- or player predicted to within +-3 spots= 2 points (e.g. picking Bryant for the Cowboys in 27th nets you 2 points because the Cowboys ended up taking him in 24th)
- or player predicted to within +-2 spots= 3 points
- or player matched to team = 4 points
This elite award for mock draftnicks is limited to the first round mocks of 20 of the bigger names in the mock draft business. You'll find a full table with all the data points below, but let's run through the highlights.
Nailed it: SB Nation's own Mocking Dan at Mocking The Draft nailed 11 picks, matching the right player with the right team, and leads our panel of draft experts. Mel Kiper, the team at Profootballweekly (PFW) and Doug Farrar at shutdowncorner.com are runners-up with 10 correct picks each.
My big board is better than yours: Rick Gosselin not only predicted 29 of the 32 players chosen in the first round, he called them in sequence: The first 29 players on Rick Gosselin's final mock were all selected in the first round. Nobody else came close to this type of uncanny accuracy, but five other mockers did get 28 first round players right - PFW, Don Banks, Peter King, Chad Reuter and Mel Kiper.
Missed by an inch or two: Peter King and PFW accurately predicted exactly half of the 32 picks to within +- 2 spots (Example: PFW predicted Jerry Hughes 29th and he was picked 31st). Pete Prisco, Clark Judge and Mel Kiper each had 14 picks within +- 2 spots:
Three's a charm: Rick Gosselin accurately predicted 20 first round picks to within +-3 spots. Peter King comes in second with 19, the PFW team is third with 18.
The CCC (Clausen Campbell Conundrum): Jimmy Clausen and Bruce Campbell were two surefire top ten picks on some mocks but ended up being picked in the 2nd and 4th rounds. Not a single mock drafter remained immune to the CCC. Every one of the 20 mockers picked Clausen in the first, and five mockers had a major stumble by picking Campbell in the first (Draftsite.com, Walter Football, WEEI.com, Doug Farrar and Scott Wright).
No big surprises: Every single one of the 20 mockers got the top three picks right. Runner-ups are Trent Williams whom 13 mockers got right in the fourth spot, and Jermaine Gresham, also picked 13 times in the 21st spot.
Rooting for the underdogs: Pete Prisco is the only one who had Tyson Aluala in the first round. The two Peters (King & Schrager) were the only mockers to have Jahvid Best on their boards, and Patrick Robinson was correctly predicted as a first rounder three times (Gosselin, PFW and Bucky Brooks).
Whodathunkit? The amount of trading certainly impacted the draft success of each mocker. However, 23 teams did not move our of their spots on draft day. But they remained hard to predict regardless. Nobody predicted the surprise pick of the draft with Tyson Alualu going to Jacksonville. But surprisingly, eight other picks of teams that did not move on draft day were correctly called only once each by our panel of draft experts (CLE, OAK, SEA, ATL, HOU, ARI, IND, NO).
And this year's Close But No Cigar Award goes to: The Profootballweekly team, who garnered 72 points in our trademarked BTBCBNC methodology. Silver goes to Peter King (71), bronze goes to Rick Gosselin (70). See the full results below:
Mock Draft Accuracy (click on column headers to sort)
| Mocker | Correct round | +-3 picks | +-2 picks | Matched to team | Huddle report score | Close But No Cigar Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFW | 28 | 18 | 16 | 10 | 48 | 72 |
| Peter King | 28 | 19 | 16 | 8 | 44 | 71 |
| Rick Gosselin | 29 | 20 | 13 | 8 | 45 | 70 |
| Mel Kiper | 28 | 17 | 14 | 10 | 48 | 69 |
| Mocking Dan | 27 | 17 | 12 | 11 | 49 | 67 |
| Rob Rang | 27 | 15 | 12 | 9 | 45 | 63 |
| Don Banks | 28 | 17 | 13 | 5 | 38 | 63 |
| Chad Reuter | 28 | 15 | 12 | 7 | 42 | 62 |
| Clark Judge | 27 | 14 | 14 | 7 | 41 | 62 |
| Pete Prisco | 26 | 17 | 14 | 5 | 36 | 62 |
| Doug Farrar | 26 | 14 | 11 | 10 | 46 | 61 |
| Bucky Brooks | 27 | 14 | 13 | 6 | 39 | 60 |
| Wes Bunting | 27 | 16 | 13 | 4 | 35 | 60 |
| Chris Steuber | 26 | 15 | 12 | 6 | 38 | 59 |
| Peter Schrager | 26 | 15 | 12 | 6 | 38 | 59 |
| Scott Wright | 27 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 39 | 58 |
| Evan Silva | 27 | 13 | 11 | 6 | 39 | 57 |
| WEEI | 25 | 14 | 13 | 4 | 33 | 56 |
| Draftsite | 23 | 15 | 13 | 5 | 33 | 56 |
| Walter Football | 25 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 37 | 50 |
38 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting
I’ve always wondered who the best mockers were, but have never come across a review like this one. Nice work, as always.
I'm really shocked Peter King porformed this well
he exceded my expectations.
Rick Gosselin was right where I expected him, near the top
by AustonianAggie on Apr 26, 2010 11:29 AM CDT reply actions
cool post OCC
"Drinks are on me if Lewis posts >168IP and an era lower than 3.86." by RangerMad on Jan 20, 2010 12:36 PM PST
One correction, O.Cool...
Gosselin predicted 28 out of the first 29 — he like everyone else missed terribly on Clausen. An impressive stat none-the-less. Despite that and his winning the “3s” he still couldn’t best PFW – excellent job, gentlemen!
… and solid work, O.Cool… your grading system adds a layer of sophistication and accuracy to the Huddle Report’s version.
Once again, BTB rules :)
Try not to get into a pissing match with a skunk :)
ha ha, you almost had me there, dude, but I believe my numbers are correct. The first 29 players on Gosselin’s final mock draft all made it into the first round. Clausen (30), Saffold (31) and Price (32) did not make it into the first.
by One.Cool.Customer on Apr 26, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions
My bad, I thought Gosselin had Clausen at 13
anyway, I shouldn’t be questioning your prowess with numbers … though I’m gonna be on your ass if you don’t produce more cheerleaders (well… uh… not, like, literally … )
Try not to get into a pissing match with a skunk :)
Just wanted to point out one thing...
In my mock, I had Clausen falling to the Cards, and the only reason I put him there is because I knew I’d catch flack for not having him at all. :-p
Unfortunately, that’s one of the only things I nailed.
by Admiral Dallas on Apr 26, 2010 11:42 AM CDT reply actions
probably just based on his actions and comments
after every pick is announced. the dude has a mini-mental breakdown.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_cowboys Pretty much required reading for any Dallas fan.
It's the hair.
I don’t really understand it either. His running big board throughout the college football season are nice, too.
If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.
by GhettoBear04 on Apr 26, 2010 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions
the guy is partially responsible for the draft industry
so we all likely owe him.
I like the guy – I don’t think he has as big an ego as some suggest, and I get the impression he still works pretty hard. He doesn’t mail it in with generalizations and catch phrases.
by I_miss_Switzer on Apr 26, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions
I like him too
People don’t like him just because they are contrary and cynical… Kiper is relatively ubiquitous on ESPN and they reject the “mainstream” out of hand.
To others, he’s what is wrong with sports media because to them he represents the over-hyping of sports minutiae… because he helped to popularize the draft as a stand-alone sports event.
He’s funny and self deprecating. He’s not at all pompous. He’s a sports nerd with a nutty hair cut and really quirky traits. He co-hosts a syndicated, non-draft, regular sports talk show – on the weekends, I think – and it’s great listening. He knows non-draft things like horse racing and baseball and is an interesting guy… even more interesting because he’s from Baltimore, and they are just grown odd there, period.
He makes fun of himself because the only thing in the world he knows is sports.
His arguments with McShay are over the top sometimes.
They really go at it. McShay is Kiper’s cryptonite. Kiper had me laughing on every WOW pick. He was hilarious when Denver took Tebow. Of course I could have still been under the influence of the endorphines after the Dez pick.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
Think about a different scoring system
One that rewards accuracy rather than favoring putting the talent in the correct round. Consider awarding every category of your point scale for every pick. That would mean a max of 10 points for eack pick. 1 for round, 2 for +-3, 3 for +- 2, and 4 for correct team. IMO this rewards correct place and team more than round and is a better indicator of correctness. This method would have scored Mocking Dan at 141 and Rich Gosselin at 140. Seems more correct since MD was right more times.
Y'all see this article about Mike Tepper?
Told some thugs to beat it when they were harrassing a girl he knew; they hit him with his car and ran over him twice. He took a beating, but didn’t even break a bone. Thugs were later busted
http://sports.espn.go.com/espnmag/story?id=3644894
by AustonianAggie on Apr 26, 2010 12:33 PM CDT reply actions
He missed two seasons in college
’06 and ’08 I think. He stayed in school 6 years. IMO he will make the 53 man roster.
my bad
he did suffer some breaks, but they seem like hair lines rather than total fractures that you’d expect from a car
by AustonianAggie on Apr 26, 2010 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Cuts already coming
http://www.prosportsdaily.com/nfl/nfl-rumors.html
Thomas sure was a bust. Glad Dallas didn’t sign him like so many wanted them to do.
Looks like Oakland will cut Russell,
he maybe the answer at OT :). He’s 6’6" 290 LBS. The biggest in NFL history IMO.
WHAT???????
Please, God, Jerry. Pick up Russell!!
That dude is HUGE. He has to block better than Procter.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
RWilliams and J Russell manning the right side
The team would be unstoppable.
If I were GM of another team
I’d snatch him up and say boy, you’re now a TE.
Let the chips fall where they may
I can't think of anything to say to this
that won’t get me a yellow card from BTB…
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
Wow
PFW did well, they have a very good draft magazine too
by nicholas.rodriguez on Apr 26, 2010 4:23 PM CDT reply actions
Another great post OCC
but you might want to correct the typo:
And this year’s Close But No Cigar Award goes to: The Profootballweekly team, who garnered 71 points in our trademarked BTBCBNC methodology. Silver goes to Peter King (71), bronze goes to Rick Gosselin (70). See the full results below:
I am actually surprised looking back at how accurate these guys were. The overwhelming perception seems to be that mock drafting is little more than guesswork, but a lot of those listed are quite impressive, especially King who people seem to criticise excessively.
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.

by 





















