Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

The 2009 Cowboys O-Line: Inside the Run Blocking Game (Part I)

Your offensive line may be the most important part of your football team. The gridiron battle is won or lost at the line of scrimmage, and the offensive line is the lynch pin, literally underpinning the success of a team's offense. In the world of fantasy football, we cheer for heroes such as Peyton Manning, Chris Johnson and Andre Johnson to fill the stat sheets and lead our teams to victories. But even the best players can struggle to produce without effective pass protection or holes to run through. Yet offensive linemen rarely get the adulation accorded to quarterbacks, running backs and wide receivers. They get noticed only when they make mistakes, but they're the key to moving the ball. Their battles are constant, and their victories more subtle, their stats invisible.

How do you judge the performance of an offensive line?

You can always do an eye-test and come away with such profound insights as "Wow, he has so many penalties, he must be really bad" (Helloooo Flozell Adams) or "Hey, they’re all over thirty, they must be old, slow and they tire easily at the end of the half/game/season" (Helloooo everybody).

You’ve heard all about this particular players’ slow feet, that players’ high center of gravity and yet another players’ bench pressing prowess. You may have tried following a debate on the finer points of the three point stance and probably gave up in exasperation once the discussion moved to proper hand placement technique and arm length.

But what does all that really tell you?

Evaluating the performance of an offensive line is not an easy undertaking, simply because success is often only measured by what didn't happen: the quarterback was not sacked and the running back was not stuffed in the backfield. There aren’t a lot of stats out there that will help you tell a good offensive line from a bad one.

But there is hope: The statistical cavalry in the form of FootballOutsiders.com has developed a couple of advanced metrics that evaluate offensive line performance based on a variety of factors. Since the goal of the offensive line in the running game is to give running backs the time and space to produce their numbers, our break-down focuses on four statistical categories – Line Yards, Power Success, Open Field Yards and Stuffs. Let’s see how the Cowboys offensive line fared in 2009 according to the FO metrics.

Star-divide

FootballOutsiders have developed their own metrics and their own terminology, and I’ve used their definitions to preface each of the statistical categories we’ll walk through below.

Adjusted Line Yards:

Based on regression analysis, the Adjusted Line Yards formula takes all running back carries and assigns responsibility to the offensive line based on the following percentages:

Losses: 120% value
0-4 Yards: 100% value
5-10 Yards: 50% value
11+ Yards: 0% value

These numbers are then adjusted based on down, distance, situation, opponent, and the difference in rushing average between shotgun compared to standard formations. Finally, we normalize the numbers so that the league average for Adjusted Line Yards per carry is the same as the league average for RB yards per carry [which is 4.29 yards].

What these numbers mean is that the offensive line is penalized for losses (a run for -5 yards is credited with -6 yards) and gets progressively less credit for a long run: The first four yards of a run are fully credited, the next six yards (the running back hits the second level between 5 and 10 yards out ) are only credited with half the yardage, for all yardage beyond the 10 yard line (the running back is now in the open field) the offensive line doesn’t get any credit whatsoever. This makes sense because you don’t often see offensive linemen blocking ten yards down the field for a running back – people are still raving about Doug Free's downfield block on Felix Jones' touchdown run against the Eagles exactly because it was so rare to see an offensive lineman in that territory.

Using Adjusted Line Yards, this is how the Cowboys offensive line performed in 2009:

Year
Rank Adj. Line Yards RB Yards NFL Avg
2009 3 4.47 4.99 4.29

This may come as a bit of a shock to those of us whose last Cowboys memory is of the Vikings game, but the Cowboys offensive line ranked third in the NFL in terms of Adjusted Line Yards last season.

But … but … but, aren’t they a bunch of over-the-hill has-beens? Well, it is true that the Cowboys offensive line has more NFL starts to their credit than any other offensive line, but like I say to those 20-somethings populating my favorite watering holes, "Age is all in the mind when youthful in spirit, honey. And think of all the experience …."

Think of the Adjusted Line yards as follows: On average, the Cowboys offensive line cleared the path for 4.47 yards per run for their running backs. Only the Dolphins (4.50) and the Saints (4.48) were better, by the narrowest of margins.

The next column in the table above are running back yards. FO define these as:

Yards per carry by that team's running backs, according to standard NFL numbers.

The Cowboys’ running backs gained 4.99 yards in running back yards, second only to the Chris Johnson-led Titans with 5.29. What the 4.99 means is that Marion Barber, Felix Jones and Tashard Choice combined to gain 0.52 yards on average more than the offensive line provided.

And this is where it gets interesting. A great offensive line will make even an average running back look good if you only look at traditional stats like total yards and YPC. The Running Back Yards minus Adjusted Line Yards provide a measure of how good a running game a team has, by taking away the contribution of an offensive line, be it good or bad. The table below does just that for the top six and bottom six teams last year.

Running Back Yards minus Adjusted Line Yards

Top six Teams
Bottom six Teams
Rank Team RBY-ALY Rank Team RBY-ALY
1 TEN 1.28 27 NE -0.10
2 CAR 0.90 28 GB -0.12
3 KC 0.74 29 IND -0.13
4 SF 0.72 30 WAS -0.20
5 BAL 0.55 31 HOU -0.37
6 DAL 0.52 32 SD -0.48

So what does this mean? Take the Titans and the mighty Chris Johnson (and the other guys who occasionally carried the ball for the Titans). Their running game averaged 1.28 yards per carry more than their offensive line provided for. Put differently: if Chris Johnson were to run behind the Miami, New Orleans or Dallas offensive lines, he might come close to 6 yards per carry. As a Dallas fan, wouldn’t that be something to salivate over? A big play running back with monster YPC stats! But wait … don’t we already have one of those?

Not one, but two! Active NFL YPC leaders, min 100 ATT.

Rank Player From To Team ATT Yards YPC
1 Felix Jones 08 09 DAL 146 951 6.51
2 Jamaal Charles 08 09 KC 257 1,477 5.75
3 Justin Forsett 08 09 SEA 114 619 5.43
4 Jerious Norwood 06 09 ATL 373 1,987 5.33
5 Chris Johnson 08 09 TEN 609 3,234 5.31
6 Tashard Choice 08 09 DAL 156 821 5.26
7 Ahmad Bradshaw 07 09 NYG 253 1,323 5.23
8 DeAngelo Williams 06 09 CAR 754 3,850 5.11
9 Pierre Thomas 07 09 NO 328 1,670 5.09
10 Shonn Greene 09 09 NYJ 108 540 5.00

And then there are the have-nots of the league, led by the Chargers, whose running backs actually gained less than what the offensive line provided.

Okay, so now that I’ve sung the praises of our much maligned offensive line, I can hear you asking "But what about all those failed short yardage and goal line attempts? And aren’t some of the longer runs by the Cowboys running backs screwing with those averages?" Thank you for that extraordinarily insightful question. On to the next metric.

Power Success

Percentage of runs on third or fourth down, two yards or less to go, that achieved a first down or touchdown. Also includes runs on first-and-goal or second-and-goal from the two-yard line or closer.

If you suffer from depression, have anger management issues or another condition that might lead you to react unfavorably to bad news, you should stop reading now. Go pet a dog or something.

It’s hardly a secret that the Cowboys offensive line struggled, and struggled mightily, with running plays on short yardage situations and goal line attempts. The numbers bear this out: The Cowboys ranked 26th in power success with 58%. Not a big revelation there, but consider that in 2008 and 2007 the Cowboys ranked 15th and 12th respectively, both times with 68%.

Year
Rank Power Success NFL Avg
2009 26 58% 64%

Here’s what’s baffling: compared to 2008 both the offensive line and the running backs were significantly healthier in 2009. Blogger Yoko Romo weighs in on the topic:

Dallas’ best running play, by far, is the draw (Football Outsiders found this when they analyzed our running game late last season). Draws make use of our large, athletic linemen who are more comfortable pass protecting (or pretending to pass protect) than blowing people off of the line. I think our lineman are more "big" than they are "strong". Draws work great on first downs in your own territory when defenses don’t know if you are going to pass or run, consistent with our strength in those areas. In short yardage and goal line, draws aren’t going to fool anybody.

Instead of drafting a big, athletic tackle/guard hybrid that the Cowboys usually seem to covet, we should draft a "mauler" who is more strong than athletic and can knock opponents backwards. Having two guards that are better at pulling than blocking the man in front of them makes it hard to run up the middle.

Between Hudson Houck, Skip Peete and Jason Garrett, fixing the Cowboys’ short yardage woes is something that the Cowboys will have to work on for next season.

10+ Yards or Open Field Yards

Percentage of a team's rushing yards more than 10 yards past the line of scrimmage. Represents yardage not reflected in Adjusted Line Yards stat.

This is fairly straightforward. By the time the running back is ten yards beyond the line of scrimmage, the offensive line have done their job and are already getting back up off the ground and are comparing their tattoos and bicep diameters.

FO are now calling all yardage beyond ten yards ‘Open Field Yards’. If you take Open Field Yards as a percentage of total yards, you get an indicator for ‘big play ability’, or at least ‘break away ability’ of your running game. Remember, the Cowboys coaching staff defines any run of 12 yards or more as an explosive play - and they sure like themselves some explosice plays.

The Cowboys not only rank sixth in the league in open field yards, but they have steadily improved in this category since 2006. If I were Jason Garrett, better yet, if I were Skip Peete, this is one little stat nugget I’d have at the very top of my CV.

Open Field Yards
Year
Rank 10+ Yards in % NFL Avg
2009 6 23% 19%
2008 8 22% 19%
2007 11 20% 18%
2006 20 15% 17%

Stuffed

Percentage of runs where the running back is tackled at or behind the line of scrimmage. Since being stuffed is bad, teams are ranked from stuffed least often (#1) to most often (#32).

Ever watch an offensive lineman after a tackle for a loss? If you look closely you’ll see that most of them are highly concentrated on staring at their shoes. This is because that’s the only way you can try to hide on a football field after you’ve just embarrassed yourself in front of a crowd of 60.000+ and countless more at home in front of the TV. You want your tackles for loss percentage to be low. Your manhood requires it.

The Cowboys rank seventh in this category, and to be honest, I didn’t expect anything else. After all, half of the Dallas offensive line is in a heavy metal band. How more manly can you get?

Year
Rank Stuffed NFL Avg
2009 7 17% 19%

Overall, the offensive line performed remarkably well outside of short yardage situations. In the second installment in this series, we’ll look at how the offensive line performed when running the ball in certain directions, and in the third and final part we’ll look at how well their pass protection held up.

 

[Hat tip to all the fine folks at Footballoutsiders.com for crunching the numbers and to Buc Wild from SBNation’s Buc’Em site for providing the template for this post]

Comment 66 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I am just curious...

I remember a statistic in Dallas’ home opener against New York, where 150 of the 200 rushing yards (or so) were the direct result of running the draw play. Is there any way, besides pouring over game film, to ascertain what a toss play, a draw play, or a trap play gained throughout the season? Have you found a way to find whether Dallas does better in straight man blocking or when zone blocking?

I have new clue where to look for that besides the game film. And unlike coahces, I do not get paid for that.

By the way, another fine post. Go Argentina!

by ScarletO on Apr 5, 2010 5:34 PM CDT reply actions  

Me too!

Outside of KC Joyner and Footballoutsiders, where you have to pay for the data, I don’t know where else I would get that data. Obviously, Raf does an occasional game breakdown in which he discusses play selection, but apart from that – nothing I know of.

by One.Cool.Customer on Apr 5, 2010 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bob Sturm

Bob Sturm (mid-day radio host at 1310AM) has something similar. On his blog he has all the stats by formation. So, not the play, but the personnel group. So, for example, you can look at the shotgun 3-wide set and know any running play there is probobly a draw play

by Blue Eyed Devil on Apr 5, 2010 11:43 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Bob Sturm

Bob Sturm (mid-day radio host at 1310AM) has something similar. On his blog he has all the stats by formation. So, not the play, but the personnel group. So, for example, you can look at the shotgun 3-wide set and know any running play there is probobly a draw play

by Blue Eyed Devil on Apr 5, 2010 11:43 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Good stuff again OCC

With your analytical skills you can never be accused of ADD.

The need for young muscle in the middle is why I am on the Lupati / Pouncey bandwagon.

I would love to trade up with Cleveland and land one of the top 2 OT this year.
But that takes serious draft chattle and $$$ against the future cap.

So the best for us would be one of those two, and take a tackle that comes to us or better yet trade for Gaither.

But we need blue chip youth on the O Line to augment the good talent we have before we need another WR or even FS.

by Travlr on Apr 5, 2010 5:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Pro Bowl

And sucks.

Yup it is hard out here for a pimp ……err, Starting O lineman.

I believe Gurode is a strong, consistent, not very smart, top 10 Center in the NFL.

Still we need young Blue Chip, not any of this we can get a C/G in the 4th round and develop him crap, C /G.

OT would be great, but no one in the draft outside the top two would have a chance in the next 2 years and those guys will be picked in the top 4 – 7 picks.

by Travlr on Apr 5, 2010 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gurode does suck. His play is just bad. people say ‘oh, but he’s a pro bowler!’ What does pro-bowl even mean? Ge got the most votes in a popularity contest with people who have ABSOLUTELY no clue how to tell a good center from a bad one.

The easiest way to get to our QB is to target the gap between Gurode and Davis. Both are easily confused by stunts. Watch the Vikings game again, they mercilessly attacked that gap and you saw the results.

We need a center that can challenge him for the starting job.

by Blue Eyed Devil on Apr 5, 2010 11:49 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

You do realize fan voting does not a Pro Bowler make

Votes coming from opposing teams count more than fan votes.

Maybe still a popularity contest, but it is your team mates and opposing NFL players that have the most sway per vote.

by Travlr on Apr 6, 2010 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

He doesn't suck.

He has mental breakdowns at times, but he is still better than half of the centers in the league.

Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Apr 6, 2010 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Who are the centers you would rather have than Gurode?

I must be missing the 10-15 top tier centers who are better than him right now. Every player has flaws, but I can’t conceive of any form of evaluation that wouldn’t put Gurode in the top 5 or 6 centers in the league right now.

Look elsewhere with your criticism— if Gurode was our biggest problem, we’d be the best team in the league right now.

(On your point about the gap between Davis and Gurode— most of the problems I saw in the Vikings game came from the end, where Edwards made Colombo look ridiculous. However, if we were to address your hypothetical breakdowns in the middle, I’d take a look at Bigg, not Gurode. He’s struggled with stunts and confusing middle looks for most of his Cowboys career.)

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Apr 6, 2010 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

There is no question Gurode is one of the best centers in the league, anyone that knows football knows that.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 6, 2010 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Any chance you can run these numbers for Emmitts line?

 Seeing how he never gets credit for being one of the best RB’s, I’d like to see how his line stacked up. Greatest line of all time or Emmitt most underrated great RB?

by beWARE94 on Apr 5, 2010 6:07 PM CDT reply actions  

I got chills

It’s been a while since I remembered what a great back he was. Spectacular vision…

Movie Reference

by accidental innuendo on Apr 5, 2010 8:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think my favorite thing

Is he never seem to give up on a play, he never stopped moving his legs until the whistle was blown

Don't Panic!!!

by levcd on Apr 6, 2010 12:24 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

And his balance

he could stay on his feet hit after hit after hit.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Apr 6, 2010 6:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Slippery

is the best word to describe Emmitt. Great vision. Tough as nails. But, it just seems like he was so good at getting out of a tackler’s grasp. He wasn’t outrunning anyone and wasn’t a Jerome Bettis-type who trucked defenders, but his spin moves and balance made him great. And a player who doesn’t have to rely on athletic ability to get by will always have the better career.

So pardon my disposition; why should I listen to a system that never listened to me?

by NICK L on Apr 6, 2010 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

yup, too small and too slow

a good thing to keep in mind when assessing the draft.

“slippery”; “balance”; “never give up”; “vision”; “tough as nails” – none of these things can be measured at a combine. Game tape and production, character count far more than any 40 time

I just got hold of a copy of the 1993 final game of the season against the Giants – which Emmitt won pretty much single handed – with a separated shoulder. Gave us the Division Title and a much easier run to our 2nd SuperBowl of the 90’s. Looking forward to watching it again.

"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson

by BoyfromOz on Apr 6, 2010 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

What a great video

Emmitt was a tough SOB to bring down.

Check out my movie - Standards of Ethical Conduct

by cowboysuberfan on Apr 6, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

wow...

Let the chips fall where they may

by sublimezg on Apr 6, 2010 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Bullsh!t!!!!

His vision made them great. We ran the lead draw 60-70% of 6the time and he found the best hole.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Apr 8, 2010 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

And Rice sucked too!

Why is it that people want to throw Emmitt’s stats out because he had a great offensive line, but Jerry Rice is catching throws from one of the best QBs in the history of the NFL, and nobody wants to take away his stats?

by jazzbo251 on Apr 5, 2010 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

it takes a team right?

people looking to diminish Emmitt simply don’t like football – maybe they like one team, but they cheer for that team with out anything specific regarding football

by AustonianAggie on Apr 6, 2010 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pro Football Reference has RB breakdowns adjusted for line

Here’s their breakdown of Emmitt’s career:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/?p=5541

If you browse around on the site, they’ve also evaluated the greatest RB individual seasons and total careers of all time, adjusted for blocking help. I don’t have the link handy, but it’s on the site in the past 3 months.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Apr 6, 2010 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Man You put in the work on this

Would you rate our backs 1,2 and 3 using some of your stats?

I saw Barber getting stuffed to often last year.

I hope we can upgrade the ground game a tad but if we equal last year we should be satisfied.

IMHO we ripped off many long gainers last year bu had trouble with the third and one or two situation.

by TCB Orange Dino on Apr 5, 2010 6:34 PM CDT reply actions  

Your Picture

Hey, great post but I find it ironic that you used the picture you did. You realize that just prior to that shot being taken the line failed miserably, allowing every single Atlanta Falcon defender to try and take a shot at Romo, and only by the grace of God and the nimbleness of Romo did he make it to that point in the photo frame. It is the moment where he decided to pass it to Crayton rather than running it into the End Zone.
I do agree that we should mix our line with guys who are good in space (for pulling and lead blocking) and those who attack the line of scrimmage, aka- a Mauler.
Remember when we use to want a short yardage push, we always ran behind Larry Allen. …..kindly hunt up another guy like him (oh please God)

by LiveNDieBlue on Apr 5, 2010 7:14 PM CDT reply actions  

I attribute the lack of short yardage success to

the lack of explosiveness off the line. Some is probably age and some is likely natural make-up of the players.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Apr 5, 2010 7:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Hey OCC

I think you’re doing a fabulous job. This may be your best post yet…and it doesn’t even have cheerleaders!

Movie Reference

by accidental innuendo on Apr 5, 2010 8:39 PM CDT reply actions  

+1

great stuff as always

by scottmaui on Apr 5, 2010 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

bravo

Its this kind of information that makes me come here for all my cowboy coverage. In depth analysis is the little extra that makes the difference between extraordinary and ordinary. Keep up the great work fellas

by butchjohnsonsquake on Apr 5, 2010 9:18 PM CDT reply actions  

Blogging the Boys? Football Outsiders?

The two places I get most of my football information and have most of my football conversations in one place in one post? Sweet.

Thanks for bringing this together, OCC.

by Arson55 on Apr 5, 2010 11:14 PM CDT reply actions  

Hey, I know you!

And yeah, I like it when these two sites can get some common ground going. This is exactly the kind of stuff I like to read: Somewhat advanced information about my team. Can’t get any better than that. I love FO, but I always am wishing that they’d talk more about MY team (which I sure everyone else who is a reader there things as well). But when BTB is able to incorporate that stuff and make a great post like this, man that’s just great.

Cheers to OCC.

by Key19 on Apr 6, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

These private moments

are so awkward for the rest of us…

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Apr 6, 2010 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yep, I've seen Key19 over on the FO boards quite a bit

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Apr 6, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd be careful with using Football Outsiders Numbers

There formulas are not really accurate in terms of determining the strength of teams overall. So, I wouldn’t accept there numbers as gospel.

That being said. The problems with the O-Line, and Flozell especially, is not the run blocking but the pass blocking, esp. when the other team knows we have to pass.

by just4fun on Apr 5, 2010 11:37 PM CDT reply actions  

For example

According to FO Green Bay was by far the best team in football last year, and New Orleans, New York (jets), Indianapolis and Minnesota weren’t in the top five. So, either no of the top teams made it to the NFC championships, or their formulas are seriously flawed. I’m voting for the latter. So, if there overall team strength formula is flawed, how accurate can the offensive line formula be.

by just4fun on Apr 5, 2010 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Their stats are accurate

But we all know, stats dont win ball games. OCC Isn’t analyzing how many games each individual player group won for us, he’s showing us the hidden stats. The stats that fill in the blanks between wins and losses. FO isn’t flawed, they’re doing what they said they were doing. By their stats those teams where the top performing teams, stats wise. I could make my own table, and assign points based on oldest qb or something, Arizona and Minnesota would’ve been near the top of the list. Now those teams did well this past season but we all know the age of their qb had no direct impact on that.

You aint been around in awhile, maybe you haven't heard........I don't shine shoes no more

by markdamack on Apr 6, 2010 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

they may be accurate stats, but the question is what do they really say about the

offensive line? The analysis of the stats is questionable. There are too many factors to account for.
And the overall team formula is the exact same situation as the O-line formula. The overall team formula is also an accurate stat. But the stat, obviously isn’t tell you which team is better.

by just4fun on Apr 6, 2010 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I hear you. The Eagles always are near the top, regardless of their record.

I like some of FO’s analysis, but their team rankings leave something to be desired.

by Mr._Mulligan on Apr 6, 2010 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just because

A team loses their first playoff game doesn’t mean that they weren’t a major threat to win it all. Look at us in 2007. Can you honestly say that we stood no chance of winning the SB JUST because we lost to the Giants in our first game? If we won that game, we probably would’ve at least made it there.

by Key19 on Apr 6, 2010 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

no, that is exactly what it means.

That’s like the “they were just lucky we didn’t make the playoffs” talk that goes with bad teams.

You are what you are. If you lose in the wild card round, you aren’t any kind of threat.

by just4fun on Apr 6, 2010 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah

not really. You’re trying to make the point that because a team won, they were the better team. But that’s not really what it means. It simply says that one team won, that day. It took 5 turn-overs and OT for the Saints to beat the Vikes. I doubt they were the better team, just the ones who won that day.

Football is won and lost on very small margins. The playoffs even more so. A play here or there can completely alter the outcome.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Apr 6, 2010 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

OCC didn't use the stats they use for teams overall (DVOA)

He used their offensive line stats. You’re talking about something totally different than what was addressed in the post.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Apr 6, 2010 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Most of the staff over at FO is fully aware that their stats aren't perfect.

They pick against the stats they put together all the time and they are constantly tweaking all of their formulas.

It’s the method of their analysis and the concepts behind a lot of it more than the end result that are interesting. Though I will say, that their usually a lot better when it comes to analyzing particular players performance than their full team rankings.

Ultimately I’ll admit that the stats and analysis is only part of what draws me to the site. Most of the guys have a sense of humor so you can read football stuff and laugh at the same time.

by Arson55 on Apr 6, 2010 12:37 AM CDT reply actions  

Great Post!

Watching the Cowboys I have become painfully aware how important the draw play is to this teams success..but..I had no idea why?..This analysis was spot on and once again you guys have delivered..

I tell everyone this site is the best at substantive football information..Just know you are so appreciated..and..keep up the good work?

by bevomav on Apr 6, 2010 7:10 AM CDT reply actions  

Our offensive line was much improved last year in the run game

maybe it was because a healthy felix was running behind them, but our run game was very productive outside short yardage situations. Honestly, even though its unconventional, the draw play is VERY effective with a back like Felix.

One word of warning: Running the ball is such a mindset, and teams can lose it from year to year. You don’t need to look any farther than the Giants this year. Many backs (say the Giants “Earth wind and fire” trio of two years ago), are not that special, and their success is more a product of their line. I don’t think Felix or Chris Johnson fall into that category. Neither would the Barber of 2006-2007, who seemed to consistently make something out of nothing.

by foyesboys on Apr 6, 2010 10:44 AM CDT reply actions  

OCC

Maybe you were planning on including this later (or have already used it in a previous article and I missed it) but I found this interesting:

Runs by direction:

Left End (Adams):
DAL 5.21 ALY Rk 3

Left Tackle (Adams/Koiser):
DAL 5.03 ALY Rk 4

Mid/Guard (Koiser/Gurode/Davis):
DAL 4.19 ALY Rk 13

Right Tackle (Davis/Colombo/Free):
DAL 4.16 ALY Rk 15

Right End (Colombo/Free):
DAL 4.80 ALY Rk 6

Maybe “Bigg” isn’t quite the “road grader” we think of him as. I mean, there’s a pretty significant drop off in running ability in the Mid/Guard and Right Tackle areas, which are the only running lanes that really involve him. I would say that Colombo/Free is part of that as well, but if that was the case then the Right End ALY values would be down as well, and they’re actually really strong.

This in my opinion strengthens the case for Iupati/Pouncey. “Bigg” isn’t the guy who usually gets the flack, but if these numbers are accurately representative then maybe it’s him who needs to pick it up. Gurode is only involved in one part and his part is low as well. So if I had to pinpoint one weakness, it’d be Center and Right Guard. I know this breaks all of the common sense that Davis is a beast, but this is at least tangible evidence besides “Davis was drafted high, has a big contract, is generally not noticed in a bad way” that is usually what builds up his supposed value. And maybe Koiser is actually as important as he seemed to be when absent in 2008. Yet again this year everyone says “scrap Koiser.” Well, at least in the running game, he seems to be very good. Either that or Adams was good enough to compensate for him as well, which would mean he was an absolute stud run blocker, in which case maybe we should’ve kept him around.

by Key19 on Apr 6, 2010 3:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Ha ha, now you went and stole my thunder
In the second installment in this series, we’ll look at how the offensive line performed when running the ball in certain directions

The good thing is that I still have an ace up my sleeve, and it’s called Tight Ends. They’ll figure prominently as we look at runs by direction in the next post, and might force you to rethink who exactly gets the credit on those runs off the left and right ends.

by One.Cool.Customer on Apr 6, 2010 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry!

I totally skimmed over those last italicized paragraphs. My bad! If I knew how to edit posts, I would scratch all that so as to not be a spoiler. lol Well at least everyone (including myself) can look forward to your analysis. :)

by Key19 on Apr 6, 2010 5:02 PM CDT reply actions  

lol, no worries, Dave just put up the second post a couple of minutes ago.

by One.Cool.Customer on Apr 6, 2010 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...
Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants
Small
A LETTER TO MIKE JENKINS...
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys Athletic D-Linemen
Small
How much does pass rush matter?

Recent FanPosts

222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
2012: Random Thoughts about Anything but a Quiet Offseason
Demarco_murray_st_louis_rams_v_dallas_cowboys_baxpocve6rkl_small
Headed in the Right Direction...(Delusional or Reality)
Small
Beat the Pass Rush
Small
Romo and the Super Bowl Question
Ryan_2008_small
Is Tony Romo an Elite Quaterback?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn