The 2009 Cowboys O-Line: Individual Pass Protection Stats (Part III)
In the two previous posts on the O-line pass protection we looked at sacks by direction and sacks while blitzed for the O-line as a whole. Today we take the analysis a step further and look at the individual players on the O-line. From a stats point of view, this is a daunting task. Consider the following:
In 2009 the official records show that the Cowboys had 550 pass attempts on offense. With 5 men on the line, there were 2,750 man-plays through the regular season. How many of these man-plays are recorded in the official NFL stats? Not a single one. In fact, the only stat the NFL keeps on O-line players is games played and games started.
Part of the reason for that is that it is very hard to objectively quantify the performance of linemen. Take the example of Jay Ratliff (I know, he doesn't play on the O-line, but at least his tackles get recorded, so bear with me here).
Todd Archer reported that the Cowboys coaching staff credited Jay Ratliff with with 83 tackles, seven sacks and 33 quarterback hurries. NFL.com credits Ratliff with 29 tackles, 11 assists and six sacks but doesn't record hurries. Pro-football-reference.com show the same number of tackles and sacks but strangely give him one assist less. Profootballfocus.com (PFF) recorded him with 25 tackles, seven assists, six sacks, five QB hits and 15 QB pressures. So who's right? They all are.
Here's why: Each of the sources quoted use a different methodology to arrive at their metrics. As long as they apply their methodology consistently to their observed universe, they get uniform and comparable results. However, trying to compare the results of the different methodologies to each other is akin to merging two universes with vastly different laws of physics: the results will be catastrophic.
Back to our O-Line. After the jump we look at the metrics for each each player, taking great care to maintain the integrity of each statistical universe we visit, we look at Alex Barron and what the stats have to say about him and dispel the myth that Doug Free underperformed in the Vikings game.
1. Handing out grades
We know that the coaches grade every player and hand out grades at the end of the season. Unfortunately, we don't always know what those grades are. So we try to arrive at our own grades. You can start with a very broad approach like Calvin Watkins did in his Cowboys Offense Report Card, and grade each player according to a methodology known only to yourself:
| Player | Flozell Adams | Kyle Kosier | Andre Gurode | Leonard Davis | Marc Colombo | Doug Free |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | B |
B | B | C | B |
Besides the unknown methodology, another issue with this type of grading is that it is not comparable to players on other teams. If Gurode graded out with an B, where does that place him among centers in the league? Is he in the top 5? Or the Top 10? Or at least above average? Let's see what other data sources tell us about that.
2. Pass Blocking Productivity
KC Joyner defines pass blocking as follows:
The main thrust of pass blocking is to keep the defender from making what NFL scouts call splash plays. Splash plays include sacks, offensive holding penalties, knocking passes down at the line of scrimmage and hitting the quarterback while he is passing. The fewer of these an offensive lineman allows, the better.
We'll have to wait until KC publishes his "Scientific Football 2010" to get the full benefit of his analysis, but there are other sources that already come pretty close to his definition. PFF in particular break down the O-line performance by sacks, QB hits and QB pressures allowed. PFF's Khaled Elsayed has developed a specific metric based on this data called Pass Blocking Productivity, or PBP (Special hat tip to Khaled for personally providing me with some of the data points for this).
PBP tries to measure how much pressure a lineman gives up per offensive snap. In Khaled's own words:
We added up all the sacks, hits and pressures an offensive lineman gave up (hits and pressures are valued at 0.75 the value of a sack in accordance with our gradings). We then divide this number by the total number of snaps in pass protection before multiplying by 100 to get a solid number. A little something like this:
([Sack + Hit(0.75) + Pressure(0.75)]/Snaps Pass Blocking) x 100 = Pass Blocking Productivity Rating
| Position | Player | NFL Rank | Total | Better Than | Snaps | Sacks | QB Hits | QB Pressures | PBP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | Andre Gurode | 27 |
34 | 19% | 622 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 2.1 | |
| LG | Kyle Kosier |
14 | 40 | 70% | 625 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 2.8 | |
| RG | Leonard Davis |
26 | 47 | 57% | 625 | 3 | 4 | 19 | 3.2 | |
| RT | Marc Colombo |
14 | 41 | 68% | 307 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 4.2 | |
| RT | Doug Free | 10 | 41 | 78% | 323 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 4.0 | |
| LT | Flozell Adams |
27 | 38 | 30% | 630 | 8 | 7 | 34 | 6.3 |
[Note on the data. NFL Rank: among players at position with > 25% snaps for their team. Better Than: shows how many of the players at a given position rank below each player. Snaps: number of times the player stayed in to block a pass rusher, includes sacks and penalties.]
In a previous post (Inside the run blocking game) we already saw that the Cowboys had one of the best run blocking O-Lines last season, but the O-line as a group struggled slightly more in pass protection.
There is little surprise in seeing that Flozell Adams graded out as the weakest player in terms of PBP. What does come as a surprise is that Andre Gurode, despite a low overall PBP, grades out towards the bottom of the list of centers.
But is it even fair to compare the 5 positions along the line with each other as I did in the table above? Perhaps not. Here's how the averages for all players with >25% of a teams' snaps compare by position. I've normalized the averages to the equivalent of 600 pass blocking snaps:
| LT | LG | C | RG | RT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacks | 6.6 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 6.3 |
| QB Hits | 9.0 | 6.5 | 3.3 | 4.4 | 6.8 |
| QB Pressures | 24.0 | 15.9 | 10.2 | 15.5 | 24.5 |
The pressure is bigger on the outside, no big surprise there, but it does show that it is not a given that the left tackle on the team always has to give up the most sacks. In fact, if we look at the two sacks Colombo and Free gave up on the right side during the regular season, that is a pretty good number. Now if we stay with the logic from the table above, where on average both tackles give up the same amount of pressure, the Cowboys O-line had a significant imbalance in pass protection.
***** WE INTERRUPT THIS STAT FEST FOR SOME URGENT VISUAL RELIEF *****
3. "Holding, 10 yard penalty"
According to Stats LLC, the Cowboys linemen were called for 13 holding penalties last year, second most in the league behind the Packers and tied with the Steelers. Somewhat surprisingly, Flozell Adams did not lead the league in holding penalties, nor did he lead the Cowboys. Here's how the holding penalties shook out: Gurode (4), Adams (3), Kosier (2), Free (2), Davis and Colombo one each.
In terms of false starts, the O-line collected 17 penalties and ranks as 'only' the 6th most penalized team in this category in the NFL. With six false starts Flozell Adams ranked a joint fifth (with 10 others) as the most penalized lineman in the NFL.
4. Alex Barron
In terms of the raw stats, Alex Barron compares favorably to Flozell Adams, but only marginally. Given that the Cowboys cut Adams, this is not exactly a ringing endorsement.
Barron had a Pass Blocking Productivity rating of 6.0 (606 snaps, 7 sacks, 15 QB hits, 24 QB pressures), and was called for five false starts and five holding penalties.
But in this case, the pure quantitative data is only part of the story. According to PFF's grading methodology, Barron received a -23.7, significantly lower than Adams' -8.8. Only three left tackles in the league graded out worse. Which brings us back to the point of the different statistical universes. Jerry Jones said: "We had a very good grade on him [Barron] in our pro scouting" which is the diametrical opposite to any stat I could find. Let's hope that when these stat universes meet in training camp and possibly on the playing field, we will not witness a cataclysmic rip in the space-/time continuum.
5. Doug Free vs. Jared Allen
For some reason there is common misperception that Jared Allen ran all over Doug Free in the Minnesota game. Here's what the numbers say: Doug Free gave up 2 QB pressures in the Vikings game in 40 snaps. No sacks and no QB hits.
Marc Colombo on the other hand gave up two sacks, two hits and six pressures in a disastrous outing. Consider that in the 544 snaps before his injury in Week 10, Colombo gave up only one sack, three hits and 13 pressures. In his two playoff games, he gave up a combined three sacks, three hits and nine hurries.
Clearly he was not ready to play yet. In the Vikings game, he would almost certainly have been replaced by Free, but Free had already come in to replace an injured Flozell Adams. So much for that.
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
OCC
I definately like the “backside” of these stats. If you know what I mean…
Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK
Great stuff OCC, as always
Colombo’s health was obviously a factor, something he has stated as well.
The rankings also look decent. I think Kosier is an excellent technician. I just worry about his strength. Gurode was a surprise, and Big was about what I expected. Not bad though that the two penciled in Ts are upper end players.
And thanks for putting a stake – or maybe a number two pencil – through the heart of the Urban Legend of Doug Free being terrible during that playoff game. If he had been, I doubt Flo would be gone today and Dez would never have happened because they would have moved instead to get a LT…
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
O.C.C.
Just on a numbers stand point where would Free rank at LT?
by spadesking131313 on May 26, 2010 4:52 PM CDT reply actions
Trick question
obviously Free’s stats as a RT cannot simply be transferred to LT, as the requirements of the position are a little different. But if we take his 4.0 Pass Blocking Productivity, he would be tied for the 9th best LT in the NFL with Chad Clifton (GB) and Max Starks (PIT).
by One.Cool.Customer on May 26, 2010 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Nice!
I think Free still has room to grow this offseason and on. Feelin’ good about the situation.
Pirates Vs. Ninjas? Psh......Cowboys, baby.
I think it's important to mention that those numbers tie him for 9th in his first 10 games.
The kid is only going to get better. At what point do we begin to take Jerry and Wade’s word for it? They told us Spencer was going to break out. He did. They told us Hamlin looks great out there. Now he has the support of Sensabaugh. They told us Jason Williams looks great out there. Well, we have yet to see, but his tools are top shelf. They told us Free is a better LT than RT. I, for one, say trust that assessment.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
I think ..
the line is in better shape right now then it was at the same point last year. If Holland can be any better than Proctor, depth is good.
by spadesking131313 on May 26, 2010 7:41 PM CDT up reply actions
PBP
I can respect that Khaled has made an attempt to quantify the pass blocking effectiveness, but I think he needs to work on it a bit more.
First, it leaves out penalties (which should be simple enough to add to his formula) and maybe forced fumbles by the QB.
Second, the weighting of hits and pressures seem arbitrary and not scaled appropriately. As opposed to a sack, the hit and pressure do not result in a loss of yardage, plus there is still some chance that a pass is completed even with a hurry or hit. My gut feeling is that .75 is too high. The scoring for Free on pressures really hurt his overall score.
And OCC, I suspect you have an error in the table with Free and Colombo having the exact same number of sacks, hits, and pressures, although I guess it is possible if this is for the regular season only. [Colombo gave up two sacks against the Vikings alone.]
by doomsdayreturns on May 26, 2010 5:33 PM CDT reply actions
PBP - a riposte
If what you want to measure is the amount of pressure a lineman gives up, PBP imho is a pretty good approximation. Penalties should not be in the mix, as they are not a measure of ‘pressure’. Similarly, ‘pressure given up’ means the lineman got beat. Whether it was for a sack hit or hurry is secondary. But yes, the three are probably weighted somewhat arbitrarily.
I also agree that for a total Pass Blocking grade (which I didn’t provide – and don’t have) you’d likely have to find a combination of pressures, penalties, some sort of POA grade and perhaps something else.
Finally, in a strange synchronicity of data points, PFF indeed have Free and Colombo with the exact same numbers (see here).
by One.Cool.Customer on May 26, 2010 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions
PBP - a parry
If a stat is named “pass blocking productivity”, it should incorporate all the factors that make the pass blocker productive and non-productive. Even if he wants to rename the stat PBPP – pass blocking pressure productivity, I would still include most penalties – holding in pass protection is a reaction to getting beaten (as was Flo’s tripping penalties); false starts are often caused when an OT is jumping the gun to get into position, etc.
As far as the weighting of hurries and hits, I will look into that a little more to make a stronger case for a lessor weighting.
by doomsdayreturns on May 26, 2010 6:31 PM CDT reply actions
I strenuously object
to the idea that a pressure should be weighted less than a sack. If a lineman gets beat and it affects the QB’s rhythm, that should be treated equally regardless of the outcome. In other words, lineman protecting Tony Romo shouldn’t be graded higher than linemen protecting Drew Bledsoe just because Romo avoids the sack more often.
however...
a defensive player should be scored with a different weight for sacks and hurries. And that weighting should be more different than 1.0/.75.
But....
A sack results in no gain and more often than not a substantial loss of yardage, not to mention the loss of the down.
However, a hurry and even a hit does not automatically mean a negative play and can even result in a 1st down or potentially points.
Now I do agree you dont want your O-Line giving up hurries, hits or sacks. But I prefer to two former as opposed to the latter.
Plus, how do take into account drawn out plays due to the QB not making the correct read or receivers not getting seperation? An O-Lineman cannot realistically be expected to hold a block indefinetly.
While I agree with your premise about reads and separation
why not throw in escapability, speed of release, play called, I mean, was the QB rolling out, how many blockers stayed in?
While we’re at it, let’s throw in the pass rusher’s 40 time. How tall is the DE? How long are his arms? What did he have for breakfast? At what point do we say there’s no way to measure or compare data?
Statistics become more and more meaningless with every variable you throw in. We have to stick to sacks, hurries, and hits. Give me enough variables and I can prove Einstein was a better blocker than Larry Allen.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
I agree with you
My point was simply to say that I disagreed with counting every pressure, hit and sack equally rather than weighting them differently.
And OF COURSE Einstein was a better blocker than Larry Allen. Everyone knows that! In fact, I dare you to find me a stat that shows that Einstein EVER gave up a single pressure, hit or sack in his entire career.
LOL. He was the man wasn't he.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
Flashback from A Few Good Men
I object, over ruled , no no, I strenuously object. Oh you strenuously object!? Oh well that’s intirely different, you strenuously object so that’s different.
These things are so objective you just use for entertainment purposes only.
If it’s done equally for all teams then it’s all good.
KICK ASS every day!!!
by squidlo97 on May 27, 2010 6:43 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
PBP- Followup
Pro Football Focus does show stats for passing under pressure. For the Cowboys, Romo was 86 for 172 for 1127 yards with 3 interceptions when under pressure. This means that even under pressure the average play garnered 6.6 yards, as opposed to negative 6 yards on a sack.
Romo’s passer rating was 71.5 when under pressure as opposed to 105.7 without pressure.
I still need to figure out a way to quantify what the weight of pressures versus sacks should be, but I feel stronger that .75 is too high.
by doomsdayreturns on May 26, 2010 7:17 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
I also think that hits should weight out higher than hurries. The hits tend to get in your head more than the hurries/pressures do.
The problem with your proposal
Is that these are statistics for OFFENSIVE linemen. Surely, if you were grading DEFENSIVE linemen, then you would consider sacks to be weighted more heavily than hits, and hits more heavily than hurries…..But that’s not what is being addressed here.
What’s the difference between a hit and a hurry in regards to an offensive lineman’s performance? I’ll save you some time – There is none!
Once the defender is past the O line, then the lineman was beat – period. What that defender is able to accomplish after breaking through the block is no reflection of the lineman doing any better of a job if the defender only chases the QB out of the pocket instead of planting his pockets on the turf.
by Pnut Gallery on May 27, 2010 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions
Colombo had no business starting at all after he came back
Once again, the coaching staff loves to say that the best player will play, but they prove over and over again that they don’t actually abide by that rule.
Wade is a "player's coach"
The negative about players’ coaches is that they get very loyal to their starters and give fewer chances to new guys. They want all the starters to love them and a starter doesn’t love the coach when the coach tries to bring in someone else to take his job.
This team makes many stupid strategic decisions because Wade is more concerned with being liked than being effective.
Last year Buehler didn’t even practice field goals because Wade didn’t want Folk to have to worry about his job. How good of a decision was that?
by Blue Eyed Devil on May 27, 2010 7:57 AM CDT up reply actions
I buy into over the top loyalty be stupid but because they want to be like
Is silly. Old school coaches believe in the loyalty and you don’t lose your job to injury, somebody has to flat beat you out.
Reminds me of what my dad said about boxing champions, you can’t beat them on points, you knock their ass out!
Not saying it’s right or wrong, just saying.
KICK ASS every day!!!
by squidlo97 on May 27, 2010 6:59 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
One more tricky question please
How do the Cowboys numbers as a unit compare to other units?
by spadesking131313 on May 26, 2010 7:49 PM CDT reply actions
PBP rank
To calculate the PBP for all teams, I used each teams total passing snap count and multiplied it by 5, then added the sacks, hits and hurries for every single individual player to the formula.
The Cowboys O-Line has a PBP of 3.7, which ranks them 19th in the league. They rank 6th in sacks allowed (16), 15th in hits allowed (29) and 22nd in pressures allowed (104).
by One.Cool.Customer on May 27, 2010 2:13 AM CDT up reply actions
Uh duh
For some reason there is common misperception that Jared Allen ran all over Doug Free in the Minnesota game. Here’s what the numbers say: Doug Free gave up 2 QB pressures in the Vikings game in 40 snaps. No sacks and no QB hits.
I have been saying that for a few months now.
And I’m not surprised at all about the Gurode stat.
2009 BTB Fantasy Champ... Deal with it
Interesting about Gurode.
Because the Cowboys also had more negative plays rushing up the middle than most teams. It really calls into question how good, or bad, Gurode is playing.
by Baked Potato Soup on May 26, 2010 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions
I called out Gurode last year for mental lapses
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2009/11/16/1160384/reason-we-have-trouble-with
2009 BTB Fantasy Champ... Deal with it
Gurode
is probobly the #1 guy on the line I’d like replaced. Him and Leonard Davis. I was hoping Pouncey would fall to us this year but it didn’t happen.
I think Gurode’s play has really fallen off as he’s aged, and I fear that trend will only continue this year.
by Blue Eyed Devil on May 27, 2010 7:59 AM CDT up reply actions
This post highlights my problem with PFF.
By their own grading methodology, Barron was slightly better than Flo, but somehow, by their own grading methodology, Barron was much worse than Flo. I don’t have a problem with people/sites compiling their own stats or having their own metrics, but when they aren’t even consistent with themselves, I question their reliability.
by Baked Potato Soup on May 26, 2010 9:00 PM CDT reply actions
Most of that is explainable
In that Flo was graded to be a much better run blocker and Barron had more penalties. So while Barron graded out slightly better than Flo in pass blocking, his run blocking + penalties brought him way down.
I will agree, though, that PFF grades are useful most of the time but they do have some real head-scratchers. D.Ware in 2008 is a good example – where I think they mixed-up his pass rush rating (good, but not great), with his run defense rating (god-like). But for a free service (i.e. hobbyists) that provides player film-based player grades…they do a pretty respectable job IMHO.
by Left Coast Cowboy on May 26, 2010 9:28 PM CDT up reply actions
I bet with Proctor and Flo off the team, that Gurode (and to a lesser extent Davis) will become the new "pet hate" for a lot of bloggers on the OL.
It seems he deserves it, too.
We need those guys to live up to their Pro Bowl expectations.
They need to lead by example seeing that they are now the senior members on the line.
Imagine how good this offense would be if they stepped up and provided a dominating core in the middle there.
Trust them...they know what they're doing.
by Aaron Novinger on May 27, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions
Don't really know what to make of any of it really, I mean as you say it's all pretty subjective.
You can mold any data to fit any side of an arguement you want; However if your into numbers, you have to pick some standard by which to go by and hope that it is fair, logical and unbiased.
The stats on Gurode are a bit concerning. I know the guy is a bull and people don’t run him over, but they seem to be able to run around him, Davis appears to have the same Achille’s heal; Guess that acounts for the elevated sacks/pressures we had from MLBs that was stated in a previous post as compared to the rest of the league.
It’s good to have data that says Free was not abused as other’s have said in the Minnisota game. I hope he becomes a dominate force for years to come.
Whenever I saw that statement I had to wonder where it came from.
Free was engaged with one of the Williams when the human mullet got his sack. Other than that I think goldielocks took the rest of the day off…except for defending his purple peeter eaters when Brooking accused the whole team of that cheap-shot score.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
Free wasn't abused, but correct me if I'm wrong; wasn't Witten over on his
side helping him? A lot? I haven’t re-watched the game (not being a masochist and all), but it seems like Witten was back blocking on Romo’s blind side. I realize it didn’t matter that he wasn’t out catching passes since Romo didn’t have time to throw anyway and would have had even less without help for the line, but still. Or am I just remembering it all wrong?
I don't think Free got much extra help
Most of the help blocking ended up on Colombo’s side because he was hurt and doing his best get Tony there too. And then Kosier and Gurode started getting abused up the middle, leaving the RB to have to watch the shortest path to the QB. It’s a cascading effect when one or more parts of the line fail.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
Yeah, it was frustrating to watch
All those weapons and no chance to use them because the line just went all wobbly.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
Offensive line priorities
It appears that only one member of our offensive line last year was in the top quarter in the league for his position (Free), and that this player is now being placed in a new position. The one player who is in the bottom quarter for his position (Gurode) has no legitimate backup. Also notice that we have not drafted or traded for anyone who has any legitimate prospect of ever becoming top quarter in the league for any offensive line position. Can we conclude that Wade Phillips/ Jerry Jones simply do not care about having a good, much less elite, offensive line?
I think there's an element of that in this issue. Not so much that they don't
care, but that they have other priorities, and they’re willing to let the O line float along not getting a lot better and hoping it won’t get a lot worse, with minimal expenditure of money and draft picks on those positions. Sort of how they didn’t upgrade backup QB until it became a crisis. It’s been clear for years that the lion’s share of the top draft picks are going to be spent on D, even as JJ acknowledges that the O line is problematic.

by 




















