The NFL Arms Race: Why It's Good That Tony Romo Is a Cowboy
This is not your father’s NFL anymore. In your father’s NFL, the run game was the key to winning. Run the ball well, stop the run, run to set up the pass - that may have been the blueprint to winning not so long ago.
With the exception of the Ravens and the Jets, all playoff participants last year finished in the top twelve in passing yards. The primary method of moving the ball for these teams: the pass.
Last season the Colts and Chargers in particular both showed that contrary to some dearly held NFL beliefs, a team's ability to run the ball has no correlation with its ability to win. The Colts finished the regular season with a 14-2 record despite ranking dead last in the league in rushing yards. The Chargers ranked 31st out of 32 teams in rushing yards and still compiled a 13-3 record.
Another popular tenet, the 'three yards and a cloud of dust' approach has also gone the way of the horse-cart, Betamax and the former Soviet Union.
Yup. Time to face some hard truths. Today’s high powered offenses live and die by the arms of their quarterbacks.
Goodbye smashmouth
The Steelers, one of the teams most closely associated with the smash-mouth brand of football are now, and have been for quite some time, a passing team. The 2009 Steelers set a franchise record with 4,328 passing yards. In fact, Ben Roethlisberger’s career passing yards per attempt rank No. 5 on the all time NFL leader’s list. Here are the top four: Otto Graham: 8.98, Sid Luckman: 8.42, Norm Van Brocklin: 8.16 and Tony Romo: 8.10.
Even Betamax-aficionado Bill Cowher grudgingly acknowledged these changes:
The game has changed, the rules have changed. I think right now, I hate to say this, but the running game is a complement. It's not the foundation that it once was. You look at the last three AFC teams that were in the Super Bowl, that's Pittsburgh, New England and Indianapolis. They're all passing teams. The running game is a complement.
Helloooo passing league
There were a record 104 games with 300+ yards passers last season. The previous record was 76, set in the 2008 season. Tony Romo had his highest career season total with eight 300+ games, one more than in the 2007 season. Over the course of the last three seasons, Romo is ranked second in 300+ games with 21, just one behind Drew Brees and five ahead of third ranked Peyton Manning.
Below is a table with the top ten QB by passing yards in 2009. The combined W-L record of theses QBs in games in which they passed for 300+ yards is 50-14, or .781.
| 300+ yards games | Matt Schaub | Peyton Manning | Tony Romo | Tom Brady | Drew Brees | Brett Favre | Ben Roethlis-berger | Philip Rivers | Aaron Rodgers | Eli Manning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 |
7 | 6 |
5 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
Traditionally the 300+ passer was a 50/50 proposition in the NFL. In your father's NFL it was believed that teams that passed for 300 and more yards were doing so because they were trailing. More often than not, once you're trailing, you also lose. Accordingly, 300+ yard passing became a benchmark number that was associated with losing. But that has changed recently. 300+ passing teams are winning at an unprecedented rate:
| 300+ passing yards games per NFL regular season, Super Bowl era, min. 26 teams | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70-77 | 78-93 | 94-01 | 02-07 | 2008 | 2009 | ||
| 300+ passing games/season | 7.5 | 51.4 | 62.6 | 71.7 | 76 | 104 | |
| No. of teams/season |
26 -28 | 28 | 30-31 | 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| Win percentage | .500 | .482 | .531 | .509 | .618 | .644 | |
Of career highs and franchise records
Of the top ten QB last year by passing yards, six achieved career highs in passing yards, 3 of them setting franchise records along the way. Here's how the 2009 season ranks in terms personal bests (PB) and franchise records (FR):
| Matt Schaub | Peyton Manning | Tony Romo | Aaron Rogers | Tom Brady | Drew Brees | Ben Roethlis-berger | Philip Rivers | Brett Favre | Eli Manning | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yards | 4,770 | 4,500 | 4,483 | 4,434 | 4,398 | 4,388 | 4,328 | 4,254 | 4,202 | 4,021 |
| Career Rank |
PB | 2nd | PB | PB | 2nd | 4th | PB | PB | 3rd | PB |
| Franchise Rank |
FR | 2nd | FR | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | FR | 3rd | 4th | 3rd |
Run-first offenses: an endangered species?
All of the above doesn’t mean that teams are going to abandon the run anytime soon. Running the ball is still important to winning games. Clock management, wearing down the opposition, maintaining a lead at the end of the game, short yardage situations - all of this still requires a solid running game.
Almost all of last season’s playoff teams ran the ball successfully when needed, but they are all pass first teams that spread the field with the pass and use the run to keep defenses off balance.
And just because a team can't or doesn't throw the ball doesn't mean they can't be successful. Your father will be quick to point out that teams like the Jets and the Ravens did pretty well with run dominated attacks. But you, wise to the ways of the modern NFL, would quickly counter that their defenses probably had a bigger role in their success than their running game. After all, the Jets had the number one ranked defense, the Ravens the third ranked defense.
This season, prepare yourself for more passing, more points, and more highlight-reel plays. This is one arms race we can all get behind, especially with Tony Romo piloting the Dallas Cowboys offense with a multiplicity of weapons.
[Note: In my next post I'll look at why QBs are breaking records left and right: More talent than ever before? Rule changes? The West Coast Offense? Stay tuned.]
88 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I hope Dez is everything we expect from the first WR selected.
If Austin continues to grow, Witten in the middle and Dez can win a starting job – lookout for 5,000 yards!
Fun read OCC.
And Romo looks like he’s dropped about 20 pounds, so I think he’s poised to avoid the rush too.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
Months have passed
since Romo was last referred to as “pear-shaped”.
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Jun 1, 2010 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions
LOL
I hate to think what the next gripe will look like :)
Original Pet-Cats: Duane Thomas, Roger Staubach, Walt Garrison, Charlie Waters, Bob Lilly
He hasn't shaved in a week, therefore he's a scrub.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
LOL ... but maybe too logical (if / then) for Tex?
Original Pet-Cats: Duane Thomas, Roger Staubach, Walt Garrison, Charlie Waters, Bob Lilly
But doesn’t the fact that he noticeably lost weight and the consideration that it will improve his game sort of justify that criticism?
by Baked Potato Soup on Jun 1, 2010 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions
I think they try something new every off-season with every player
Ware came in slightly heavier one year; Brady James lighter and heavier depending on the season. Lendale White… never mind.
Anyway, if Romo has dropped weight, it’s because they want to try doing something with him or his game. My guess is help him avoid the crazy-azz situations his inconsistent line puts him in. I don’t take it as an indictment of him or his conditioning.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
Uh, Tony, we just fired your LT.
Don’t worry, don’t worry. Free can do the job. (Holds hand to side of mouth and whispers) Just in case you better get ready to RUN FOR YOUR LIFE!!!
Kind of reminds me of Jackie Gleason in Smokey and the Bandit as he’s about to drive his police cruiser under the 18-wheeler. He matter of factly states in that gruff southern accent, “You better duck or you’ll be talkin’ out your ass!”
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
Yeah, I was going to say the same thing. He's got to be that much
faster if he’s going to be running for his life this year.
Haha
Anyone else and I would assume this was a joke.
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Jun 2, 2010 7:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Maybe he hasn't.... but that won't stop me from throwing this out there...

Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 2, 2010 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions
Should have known better than to mention you-know-who
Show me your spreadsheet Terry.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
All seriousness though...
Whether he has or hasn’t, I really don’t think it mattered. It wasn’t like he was ever Jamarcus Russell.
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 2, 2010 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions
I just saw a pic on DC.com where he looked thinner.
After his appearance on The Biggest Loser and all I was horsing around with it, and boom..I’m blind. Go figure. I guess he’s forgotten who around here has defended him.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
That's his yin to his yang my friend.
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 2, 2010 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Good post
I agree with everything. But if your defense is the more dominant of your two units, then you probably want to shorten the clock, therefore you run the ball more (Jets and Ravens). You play to your strengths. If you have a championship caliber defense, running the ball on offense gives your team the best chance to win. The Boy’s have the luxury of having both, so Wade should just let them both play wide open, full throttle football.
that's why the Jets and Ravens
Added big name WRs
Funny how...
in even in the face of the stats given above, many other media outlets do not want to rank Romo within the top ten QBs in the league let alone top 5-7.
I'll take Tony the way he is
and let the mediots bash him. It doesn’t matter if they say 1st or 15th we know he perfoms.
Semper Fi Do or Die
Really?
Most media outlets that I have seen, excluding other teams’ bloggers, put him squarely in that second tier with Rivers, Rogers, and Roethlisberger, behind Brady, Brees, and Manning. I can’t think of any that don’t consider him top 10.
by Baked Potato Soup on Jun 1, 2010 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions
most do
but honestly, this may be just my bias, but I’ve seen him ranked below donovan mcnabb on many sites, and I just don’t understand that. Romo has been a better qb than McNabb since he started halfway through 2006. I’ve seen him ranked below gerard occasionally..again, that is dead wrong.
Most give him the expect he deserves, but there are definitely a few cowboy haters.
Even though there is more to this game than stats, Romo’s stats speak volumes – either he is by far the luckiest qb in nfl history, surrounded by an immensely talented team and offensive line (hah), or he is a legitimate top 10-7 qb. I think anyone (even most eagles fans) can see the latter is true.
It seems that media outlets suffer from
penis envy Cowboy hatred – everything in Texas is just . . . well . . . bigger!
Great stuff OCC
I know how exciting we all get watching Tony do his thing. Seeing his stats next to “top teir” qb’s makes me giddy. I find very few things in life funnier than when someone starts bashing romo. “he cant win, he chokes, he goes on vacation”. You’ve all heard it. But when all is said and done, we have one of the best ring masters in the game. Keep him upright and great things are bound to happen! GO COWBOYS!!!
Fulton Greenwall: Perhaps we should slow down just a teensy-weensy bit?
Ace Ventura: Nonsense, poopy-pants.
by I am a Romosexual on Jun 1, 2010 9:01 AM CDT reply actions
When did Manning or Brees go on vacation
The spotlight is on Tony and he has yet to have is greatest game in the greatest moment. Very few QBs are Superbowl champs, even when Peyton won his, the D carried him there. QBs do a lot, but not everything. Mcnub was traded after taking his team to the playoffs. I hope Jerry never cuts a quality QB with a team that is close to winning it all.
The NFL is set up to be a passing league
Over the years there have been several rule changes that have benefited the passing game.
Defensive backs can no longer hit a receiver 5 yards pass the line of scrimmage.
Defensive backs cannot lead with there heads, or leave their feet during a hit on a WR
If a QB is outside of the tackle box and the ball is thrown forward the QB basically spike the ball
The QB has been protected in where he can hit, not near the knees, not in the head
How late he can be hit
Teams would be foolish not try and take advantage of the rules changes.
It is no longer “three things can happen when you pass and two are bad”
Yeah the "chuck" rule...
Is probably the one that did the most.
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 1, 2010 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions
Agreed
And that change was introduced in 1974. The league has been steadily evolving away from a run-based offense ever since. The 1981 49ers won a Super Bowl and the 1984 Dolphins and 1985 Patriots won their conferences with no discernible running game.
So this is part of a long-term trend, not something new.
Can either of you clarify the "chuck rule"?
I realize I’m a rarity on this blog, but I wasn’t even alive in 1974.
Chuck Rule
Prior to 1974 there was no rule that gave defenders a single shove or chuck within five yards of the line of scrimmage, with no contact allowed beyond that point. Defenders could impede receivers with their hands, arms or body, provided the ball wasn’t in the air, which of course would be defensive pass interference. It was a regular tactic to rough up receivers at the line of scrimmage and even when running routes.
There were other rules which made the passing game risky, like defenders being able to flatten defenseless receivers (RIP, Darryl Stingley), looser interpretation of roughing the passer, and offensive holding was enforced more strictly and was a 15 yard penalty. But I think allowing receivers to run free routes dramatically changed how the game was called. In 1973, third down and three was a down where offenses ran as often as they passed. By 1978, teams were going three wide and throwing it 20 yards down field in the same situation. It was a landmark change in how the game was played.
Unless you happened to be on those "lost years" for the Cowboys
When a pass on 3rd down and 3, if completed, more often led to 4th down and 1.
Well the chuck rule was again changed after the 2001 Super Bowl.
Remember it changed the distance that you are allowed to bump the receiver.
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 2, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions
The Rule Has Always Been the Same
But after Reggie Wayne and Marvin Harrison were mangled by Patriots defenders in the AFC Championship game following the 2003 season, the league made it a point of emphasis. Same rule, just more strictly enforced, starting with the 2004 season.
Aaaaah
Thanks bro, did not know that.
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 2, 2010 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions
yea, nice addition Miles :)
Original Pet-Cats: Duane Thomas, Roger Staubach, Walt Garrison, Charlie Waters, Bob Lilly
I'm going out on a limb, removing all semblance of objectivity, wearing my hate for Eli on my sleeve ...
But here’s one prediction: That will be the ONLY year Eli tops 4000 yards.
Why? I just saw way too many lucky plays through the season. And I just don’t think he’s changed so much from his days of “almost horrible” … he still hears footsteps more than most QBs, and anyway if you couldn’t tell I just love to hate on that guy.
This post is very telling, but rules-wise, has anything really changed since 2007? Why the huge jump in the last two years?
Original Pet-Cats: Duane Thomas, Roger Staubach, Walt Garrison, Charlie Waters, Bob Lilly
I think
the giants defese may suffer some this year and one of two things will happen, they run more to protect the defese or they try to outscore the other team in a shoot out.
by Musiccitynorm on Jun 1, 2010 10:14 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Norm
was there a secret message in there, when you removed all the "N"s from “defense”??
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
haha
on a phone, and its small and I’m old?
by Musiccitynorm on Jun 1, 2010 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Ah
I was hoping for something profound, like the old “THERE’S NO I IN TEAM!!!!”. “THERE’S NO N IN DEFENSE!!!” only I didn’t know what that meant…
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
I'm always humbled by the level of discourse in these threads :)
Original Pet-Cats: Duane Thomas, Roger Staubach, Walt Garrison, Charlie Waters, Bob Lilly
there's no R in dunkman;
That one has always baffeled me. :)
lol
I think we watch all the same shows! You hacking into my TiVo?
Trust them...they know what they're doing.
by Aaron Novinger on Jun 3, 2010 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions
But do you also read Chuck Lorre's Vanity cards at the end of each show?
If you do then we need to consider starting our own SBN blog and calling it ‘Geeks United’.
by One.Cool.Customer on Jun 3, 2010 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Of course!
Every single, one.
Trust them...they know what they're doing.
by Aaron Novinger on Jun 3, 2010 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Eli impressed me last year
he looked like a much better player. In our 1st game, Mario Manningham had a couple huge drops (he had them throughout the year) if i remember right. Hes still not extremely accurate, but he looked far better to me than in years past.
I think the huge jump is due
to a number of qbs that have become elite, and 300 yard passing threats every game as well as a number of qbs that have made strides or are recently drafted/starting (Eli, Schaub and Rodgers give you 15 right there & Warner was great in 2008 and 2009).
I think the quality of qb play in 2009 was just much better than it was in 2007.
Correction
It’s the Soviet Union that’s no longer around. We still have most of the FORMER Soviet Union.
frank wycheck
said on the radio this morning dallas has signed or will sign some guy from australia who ran a 4.10 at his work out, 6,1 and 195.
Frank said he looks like a football player. I didnt hear his name anybody else hear this
by Musiccitynorm on Jun 1, 2010 10:18 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Crocodile Dundee
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 1, 2010 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions
No joke
he said the guy has never played football but is an athlete. the radio show briefly talked about him. Strange for nashville but they were curious because of his speed and size. Frank was the one who was bringing him up and the other guys on the radio show blew him off sahying the guy would have to learn to catch and run routs, but frank pointed out 4.10 speed. said he would be watching this guy.
by Musiccitynorm on Jun 1, 2010 10:37 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I mean there isn't anything wrong with bringing him to look at him.
That’s pretty fast though.
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 1, 2010 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions
What, Titus Ryan isn't fast enough?
Also, the story below says the guy is 29 – pretty old for a rookie
Trend
I know the trend has moved to a passing league, I just hope it doesn’t turn into arena football. Not that I have Arena Football, but I would really hate to see the running game relagated to something that is last resort as apposed to something that is a big contributer to the game. I guess as soon as the defenses catch up to these passing teams, the run will make a bit of a comeback.
I don’t know. Just saying
The superbowl was a severe disappointment to me
Both defenses played “bend, but don’t break”. The offenses were the top two in the league, and took what the Ds gave them. I would’ve rather watched a 40-35 game where the Ds go all out to stop the position, even if they make some mistakes and give up more points.
Looks like teams with 300 yard passer
are winning at about a .625 rate since 2006…but the Cowboys are 20-4 when Romo throws for 300+…for a winning percentage of .833. Btw, here are the scores of the 4 games the Cowboys lost when Romo passed for 300+ -
31-39 vs Detroit
24-26 vs Washington
24-30 (OT) vs. Phoenix
24-31 vs Giants
At 26 points scored per contest, it likely wasn’t Romo airing it out that lost these games. Just FYI, opposing QBs in these 4 games threw 10 TDs and 3 INTs, opposing punt returners went 14-256 (18.3)-1 and there were two other special teams TDs scored against the Cowboys as well.
Actually the overall turnover battle wasn't so one-sided
courtesy of www.profootballreference.com
vs Detroit – 4 turnovers, 1 takeaway
vs Wash – 1 turnover, 0 takeaways
vs. Cards – 1 turnover, 3 takeaways
vs. NYG – 1 turnover, 2 takeaways
Total – 7 turnovers, 6 takeaways (-1)
Btw Romo accounted for 5 of the 7 team turnovers (2 ints, 3 fumbles lost)
But overall it appears that atrocious special teams play (there were also at least 3 missed FGs in these four losses) and soft defensive play accounted for these losses more than turnovers.
NFL is definitely a passing league...no question about it
If you have a really good qb, you have a chance to be a really good team…without one, you really have no chance whatsoever.
In Romo we Trust
Last time I checked, this is 2010
Not 2000 or 2002. I was speaking in the present tense in case you missed it.
In Romo we Trust
The other side of the coin
is that as the game evolves into a passing league, it requires a good pass defense. It starts with the pass rush – we’re set there with Ware and Spencer. But on the back end, I’m a little concerned about the safety position. We’ve proven how important the position is, both good (Woodson) and bad (RW later years). I’m pulling for Ball – let’s hope he’s watching some tape of Jenkins batting away all those balls. By the end of the year we’re going to need a good replacement for Newman.
I'm sort of waiting for the other blog-shoe to drop here
There’s almost always a “I hate Garrett” – “I like Garrett” blood-feud whenever the subject ot play calling and run/pass mix comes up. I think this article is pointing us to the idea that Garrett would be an NFL Luddite if he became what some fans demand daily – to be more balanced. In fact, you could read the numbers (Dallas’ and the rest of the league’s) as saying he might need to pass MORE to take the offense to the next level…
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
I've Always Thought the Run/Pass Ratio
Was a red herring about Garrett’s play calling. There were times he maintained a reasonable run/pass ratio, say 40-60, where I thought his choice of plays showed no imagination or awareness of defensive adjustments. In 2008 I swear he went to the Mike Martz school of passing, falling in love with the 30 yard square in routes far too often.
That said, to my critical eyes he seemed to grow up a lot last year and started mixing in short passes like slants and screens, making overly aggressive defenses pay dearly. I’m cautiously optimistic about how he will turn out, whereas last year I was doubtful.
No feuding ..
but I’d love for the Boys to become the team that is balanced early and pounds a defense late. No complaints from me about Garrett, but I find it extremely odd that, in what 3 years, I can not recall one trick/gadget play on offense. Not a single one!
by spadesking131313 on Jun 1, 2010 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions
I can remember
numerous franchise records being broken in Garrett’s time as co-ordinator. Probably a better indicator of success.
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Jun 1, 2010 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions
Hey man ...
I am a Garrett fan … just remarking on an odd observance. I find it funny that he never uses gadget plays. That’s all.
by spadesking131313 on Jun 2, 2010 5:33 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm in agreement with this strategy
of being balanced early and pounding late. This should mean we start Felix and Choice and bring in the Barbarian to start beheading people to finish the game.
Love the numbers but will add a different spin to it, debate this analysis:
More than the rules changing, this is a reflection that we are living at a time when, much more than recently, the NFL has a large number of QB’s performing at high levels, working in their primes.
Look at that chart in the post. I’d take any of those QB’s as a starter on my team-even EManning! I don’t remember in recent memory having so many teams with quality starting QB’s.
Someone will do a chicken/egg and say these QB’s are performing well because of the rules, but I don’t think so. Those guys are good, and like the years following the famous draft of the 80’s, i think we’re just enjoying an unusually high level of QB play. Which is leading to wins for their teams.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
How about the fact that there more colleges are running pro style offenses too?
QBs are schooled in proper passing fundamentals, and are learning more complex offenses, at a younger age. The transformation in college football from smashmouth running games to aerial offensive shows has been even greater than the NFL’s transformation.
could be a factor for sure
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Jun 1, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions
Austrailian Olympic Sprinter Tryout WR with Cowboys
Josh Ross is the Aussie rumored to have a tryout with the Cowboys for WR. He claims he can run a 4.10 40 but that is yet to be seen. He has run a 10.22 in the 100 meter so he is fast running a straight line. Recalling how Bob Hays dramaticly changed the game makes raw speed hard to ignore. I was a witness. I’m still interested in watching Titus Ryan.
Bill
con-TROLL ....
yourself!!
OCC will wrap his stats around your head and squeeze … if you are not careful!
You down with OCC?
by spadesking131313 on Jun 1, 2010 8:09 PM CDT reply actions
yeah you know me
Really?! Really?!
by thebigham on Jun 1, 2010 8:29 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I'd be interesting a follow up
on your “father’s father’s” strategy. Now that would be interesting.
"The Most Dangerous Man in the world is the one with nothing to lose"

by 






















