Cowboys Offseason Moves: More No-Huddles for Tony Romo?
Sponsored Post: This post is presented by Sprint. Bringing you the first wireless 4G network from a national carrier. Only on the Now Network.
Lately, I've been leisurely leafing through last season's game books, and one previously overlooked nugget repeatedly caught my eye: the no-huddle offense.
More often than not, the no-huddle offense is used by NFL teams as a "hurry-up" in an effort to speed up the game as time is running out and get quick scores at the end of a half.
But the no-huddle doesn't always have to be about snapping the ball faster. Arguably, the biggest advantage of the no-huddle is the threat of snapping the ball quickly, which takes away the ability of the defense to substitute players, forces the defense to simplify and allows the QB to get a long, hard look at the defensive formation. Some teams will delay snapping the ball for quite some time after they've lined up, using the time to adjust their formation, blocking assignments and plays to what the defense is showing.
The Cowboys went into a no huddle offense 30 times in 6 different games last season. They ran the ball three times and the NFL scorekeepers recorded 27 pass attempts. That's almost a whole game's worth of pass attempts and therefore warrants a closer look, so after the break we'll look at those pass attempts and the no-huddle in a little more detail.
The no-huddle in 2009
Tony Romo had a passer rating on his 27 no-huddle pass attempts last season of 111.5. That is the fourth best value in the league among all teams who had a minimum of 20 attempts out of the no-huddle. Only the Colts (123.1 rating, 64 pass attempts), Redskins (119.4, 26) and Steelers (116.8, 39) were better. Arguably, a lot of the Cowboys' no-huddle pass attempts came against prevent defenses, but so did the no-huddle pass attempts for most other teams as well.
That 111.5 is an impressive number. So why didn't the Cowboys use the no-huddle more often? First, let's look at when the Cowboys used the no-huddle.
| Wk 1: Bucs | Wk 3: Panthers | Wk 7: Falcons | Wk 10: Packers | Wk 13: Giants | Wk 14: Chargers |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of no-huddle pass attempts | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 4 |
Even the casual observer will notice that the bulk of no-huddle plays came in the three losses in the second half of the season. In fact, of the 27 pass attempts, 24 came either in the fourth quarter (21) or in the two minute warning (3) when the Cowboys were in desperation mode and trying to score to save the game:
Vs Packers: About 10 minutes left in the 4th quarter. The Packers have just scored a TD to move the score to 17-0. The Cowboys whip out the no-huddle on two consecutive drives. The first drive starts at the Dallas 23 and the Cowboys march down the field almost at will, only to have a pass intended for Jason Witten intercepted at the one yard line by Charles Woodson. On the next and final drive of the game, starting at their own 37 yard line, the Cowboys break out the no-huddle again, again march across the whole field, and this time score a touchdown on a nine yard pass to Roy Williams. Too little, too late.
Vs Giants: Down 17-31 with five minutes left in the fourth quarter, the Cowboys again resort to the no-huddle. On the first drive, the Cowboys fail to convert a 4th and 2 on the Giants 35 yard line. On the next and last drive, the Cowboys start on their own 39 yard line and no-huddle their way to a 22-yard touchdown pass to Miles Austin with one minute left to play.
Vs Chargers: The Chargers just scored a field goal to make the score 20-10 with 2 minutes left in the 4th quarter. Dallas get the ball on their own 14. Four no-huddles and a total of nine plays later Patrick Crayton scores on a 9 yard touchdown pass. Game over.
Last season, the Cowboys used the no-huddle almost exclusively in end-of-game situations in which they were trailing and needed to score in a hurry. But isn't there an opportunity to use the no-huddle outside of (with the benefit of hindsight:) "garbage time"? The no-huddle requires experienced players and a good knowledge of the playbook and offensive schemes to work. Think about it this way: Every single starter on offense (barring Dez Bryant who may potentially become a starter later in the season) will be entering at least his third season with the Cowboys in the same offensive system. This is a very experienced offense, one that should be experienced enough to run the no-huddle more often if they want to.
The case for and against the no-huddle
The no-huddle offense can wear down defenses if executed successfully. But if you go three-and-out, the only defense you'll be wearing out is your own.
Defenses that like to rotate players in and out of the game are forced to simplify their game plan as the no-huddle can take away the ability of the defense to substitute players. When caught off guard by the no-huddle, defenses are more likely to call timeouts or get a penalty for having too many men on the field. But since the heyday of the no-huddle offense, first with the Bengals in the late 80s and later with the Bills in the 90s, defensive coordinators have learned to game-plan for it.
Another great advantage of the no-huddle offense was articulated by the New York Post, who only half-jokingly claim that the no-huddle offense is the best thing to happen to football on TV:
Consider the Colts' no-huddle act on Monday night: With Peyton Manning immediately bringing the team to the line, ESPN's announcers could not analyze, let alone over-analyze, every play; there was no time for crowd shots, promos, text-message polls, sideline interviews, stat graphics, blimp shots, Chris Berman.
The no-huddle forced ESPN to stay on the field, specifically the part where the football was. Imagine that! The no-huddle makes better TV because it makes TV better!
The no huddle in the NFL today
The no-huddle never has been used widely at the NFL level, but there are a couple of teams that used it quite frequently last year: 27% of the Browns' offensive plays came out of the no-huddle, the Bills ran 21.3% of their plays out of the no-huddle and the Ravens turned to the no-huddle on 17.4% of their plays. The success of the no-huddle varies widely as you can see in the table below (hat tip to BTB member Fan in Thick and Thin for providing the play-by-play data):
No huddle offense by NFL team, 2009 (click column header to sort)
| Team | Total Plays |
No-huddle plays | in % | of which 4th Q & 2 min warning in % | Passes in % | Passer rating |
Rush YPA |
| Browns | 971 | 262 | 27.0 | 31 | 55 | 74.3 | 4.1 |
| Bills | 911 | 194 | 21.3 | 30 | 58 | 68.5 | 3.9 |
| Ravens | 1014 | 176 | 17.4 | 17 | 47 | 91.4 | 4.7 |
| Colts | 980 | 86 | 8.8 | 28 | 74 | 123.1 | 2.3 |
| Panthers | 1023 | 82 | 8.0 | 54 | 71 | 57.4 | 7.2 |
| Chiefs | 1019 | 72 | 7.1 | 42 | 75 | 82.3 | 4.3 |
| Eagles | 975 | 61 | 6.3 | 34 | 61 | 52.4 | 4.8 |
| Lions | 1037 | 61 | 5.9 | 77 | 84 | 75.0 | 6.4 |
| Patriots | 1076 | 60 | 5.6 | 55 | 80 | 82.5 | 3.0 |
| Bears | 971 | 49 | 5.0 | 37 | 65 | 69.1 | 4.9 |
| Dolphins | 1088 | 54 | 5.0 | 74 | 85 | 85.3 | 6.3 |
| Steelers | 1014 | 50 | 4.9 | 48 | 78 | 116.8 | 4.2 |
| Giants | 1017 | 44 | 4.3 | 80 | 75 | 84.9 | 8.4 |
| Cardinals | 985 | 41 | 4.2 | 68 | 98 | 66.0 | 5.0 |
| Seahawks | 1045 | 43 | 4.1 | 63 | 77 | 70.1 | 4.9 |
| Jaguars | 1010 | 39 | 3.9 | 85 | 67 | 92.9 | 2.9 |
| Falcons | 1048 | 34 | 3.2 | 38 | 68 | 44.8 | 3.5 |
| Bucs | 961 | 31 | 3.2 | 94 | 81 | 45.3 | 4.0 |
| Raiders | 944 | 29 | 3.1 | 93 | 76 | 94.5 | 5.3 |
| Cowboys | 1020 | 30 | 2.9 | 83 | 90 | 111.5 | 3.7 |
| Jets | 1030 | 30 | 2.9 | 50 | 53 | 99.0 | 4.1 |
| Redskins | 970 | 27 | 2.8 | 93 | 96 | 118.4 | 16.0 |
| Titans | 990 | 24 | 2.4 | 88 | 96 | 65.9 | 9.0 |
| Rams | 998 | 16 | 1.6 | 75 | 94 | 8.8 | 0.0 |
| Vikings | 1054 | 12 | 1.1 | 83 | 83 | 43.3 | 2.5 |
| Chargers | 972 | 11 | 1.1 | 64 | 100 | 144.3 | - - |
| Packers | 1042 | 10 | 1.0 | 90 | 100 | 71.7 | - - |
| Bengals | 1011 | 7 | 0.7 | 57 | 86 | 95.1 | 1 |
| Broncos | 1032 | 7 | 0.7 | 100 | 86 | 69.4 | - - |
| Saints | 1032 | 5 | 0.5 | 80 | 80 | 135.4 | 3 |
| Texans | 1043 | 4 | 0.4 | 100 | 100 | 88.5 | - - |
| 49ers | 939 | 2 | 0.2 | 100 | 100 | 158.3 | - - |
Mo' no-huddles or no no-huddles?
Should the Cowboys use the no-huddle offense more? Should Jason Garrett use it as a change of pace play throughout the game, and not just as a hurry-up offense when time is running out?
27 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree with your conclusion
No huddle has some definite strategic advantages – not to mention better TV.
But I really don’t know what the no-huddle passer rating means. Like you said, it usually measures effectiveness vs. prevent defenses. I don’t know that it tells us anything about no-huddle vs. base defense – which is what we would be doing if we ran it more.
Correct
Peyton and the Colts run it even if they are up by 21. It’s just part of their offensive game plan.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Interesting OCC
As Dallas walks into the NFL season with arguably the best set of skill position players they’ve EVER had, I would say the no-huddle offers even more of an advantage to Dallas because of the sets line up in and the match-ups they can exploit.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Agree with 5Blings. The Cowboys should use it to their advantage, especially when Felix is in the backfield
My favorite semi pro teams are the Eagles and Giants
by RealAlbertEinstein on Jun 14, 2010 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions
Lining up with
Witten, Austin, Dez, Bennett and Felix, with the option to split either of the latter two into the slot would present almost unsolvable mismatches from the no huddle.
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Jun 15, 2010 12:21 AM CDT up reply actions
I'd like to see more
In the chess match that’s become the NFL, taking coaches out and putting in more of the players can only help the Cowboys because of their experience. As you astutely point out, every player has been in the system at least 3 years. They know their stuff.
Put it on Romo to call the plays at the line. He knows what he’s doing. Force the defenses to react to us. With all our versatile skill position players, we should be able to create mis-matches regularly.
More no huddle please!
If you think Roy was running the wrong routes now
just wait until Romo is calling the play at the line of scrimmage. The dude will become a DB.
Seriously, there’s an advantage there…as long as you initiate the no-huddle when you have the right defensive package on the field.
It also allows the pass rush to tee off.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
Two points, pro and con
The Colts in the past drafted slightly smaller, more athletic linemen because they could run the no-huddle more effectively (obviously needed less of a breather). They have since up-beefed their line, so there is a lot of speculation that they will reduce their use of no-huddle. So does Dallas even have the right players on the lne to run more no-huddle? Not sure.
The pro side is equally interesting to me. When you have dual threat TEs, it makes your “base package” for offense so much more difficult to defend because Dallas can run and pass equally well without a change of personnel.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
I've been saying this for 3 years.
I don’t think Dallas should do it all the time, but I more like Pittsburg was doing it.
If Pittsburg was struggling to move the ball a couple of years ago, they wouldn’t hesitate to go no huddle even if the game was close.
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 14, 2010 10:37 AM CDT reply actions
I like how it gasses the pass rush
I always notice how DWare and company fade about 3-4 plays into a no-huddle drive. I think its a great weapon to use against a good pass rush to slow them down. Of course your own o-line has to be in good enough shape to do it.
Check out my movie - Standards of Ethical Conduct
I see Romo calling his own plays at the line
We win everything, by becoming the Colts, except we have a better defence and running game
This is in response to dunkman...
Sorry…“reply” isn’t working for me on this thread.
I completely agree with you on the point about the possibilities being endless with the TEs we have.
But in response to your first point about us having a heavy line that might not hold up I’d like to say that although I think we should go to the no huddle more, I’m not thinking it should be used to sustain entire drives throughout the game. Maybe just mix it in for a series here and there when either we’re just having a little trouble getting things going, or maybe the defense is starting to show some fatigue or lack of focus. Like O.C.C said, it can lead to some helpful penalties or wasted timeouts.
Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable. --
Tom Landry
It might work
but if these guys false start and hold at home, in perfect conditions and probably in their sleep, imagine what happens if they’re winded on a long no-huddle drive.
I’m overall in favor of trying it, but not completely optimistic about pulling it off like the Colts can…
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
I'm in the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" camp
We have an excellent offense, we don’t need to use an extra gimmick to move the ball. Let’s just keep it simple and execute the offense.
Original Pet-Cats: Duane Thomas, Roger Staubach, Walt Garrison, Charlie Waters, Bob Lilly
Correct me if I'm wrong
but in 2007 and 2008 when we went no huddle, I felt our offense seemed to have a much better flow and rhythm to it. Additionally, it also seemed as though we ran more no huddle plays in each of those seasons too.
Count me in the group that would like to see some more no huddle in 2010.
Why do i look at Popivich with a arm around a player talking with 2 minutes left, and get jealous?
by semsemma on Mar 10, 2010 8:00 PM PST
at Home vs. Vikings in 2007
the game when Watkins returned the blocked FG, we went without a huddle about 75% of our plays in the first half.
by percyhoward on Jun 14, 2010 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd like to see more shotgun and no huddle
These play to Romo’s strengths and therefore more offensive productivity.
In Romo we Trust
It should be tried to jump start the offense when they're sputtering
Our two worst offensive games last year were at Green Bay, and at Minnesota in the playoff game. In neither game did we get completely shut down. We were just really inefficient and couldn’t string good plays together without shooting ourselves in the foot. In situations like that, go to a no huddle earlier than when you’re forced too. Try to kick things into gear by using a different rhythm when the game is still in question.
I agree completely.
It seemed to me that when we did use it in 2007 and 2008 (outside of desperation situations) that its purpose was to smooth out a bad start.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Jun 14, 2010 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions
not a bad idea at all
Original Pet-Cats: Duane Thomas, Roger Staubach, Walt Garrison, Charlie Waters, Bob Lilly
It still comes down to eliminating the negative plays that kill drives
As Garrett has said. Not sure if the no huddle will accomplish that, but it’s worth trying more often since the no huddle keeps the defense back on its heels to an extent. Romo did a great job reducing his negative plays last year; now the rest of the offense has to do the same. Of course, missed FGs were among the negative plays that cost us points, and it’s highly questionable whether we have solved that problem.
by East Bay Ray on Jun 14, 2010 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Man. Excellent ...
I’ve been asking for this for years!!!!!
"They need security in the world, Craig!"
No Huddle?
I have never been a fan of this type of offense. The only guy I have ever seen run it and have long term success is Payton Manning.
Ahab the Arab
I say keep an eye on this kid, this Louie the Looper. He's going places!
Oops
Peyton
Ahab the Arab
I say keep an eye on this kid, this Louie the Looper. He's going places!
The question I have is
Since those teams which run the no-huddle best run it the least is there a tipping-point when the league is ready for it and can stop it more easily?
There seems to be a correlation above that denies the logic of: run it more because you are good at it. Peyton Manning should be excepted from this discussion but even he uses it only 8.8%.
I like the idea
of adding this to the offense; however, it must be done repetitiously in practice then start adding it to every game plan for at least a series or two. AS the offense becomes more familar with it then towards the middle to latter part of the season they would have another viable offensive weapon.

by 























