Poll: Already Looking Forward to the Cowboys' Bye Week
For the Dallas Cowboys to make a postseason run, it would help to get off to a great start. Seeing that their bye is in Week 4, a 3-0 record to start out the season would be ideal.
At first glance, Dallas' pre-bye week opponents--the Redskins, Bears, and Texans--don't look too menacing. But two of these three games are on the road. All three of these opponents are led by veteran quarterbacks who can and will sling the ball against the Cowboys.
Let's take a look at which of these three teams will provide the biggest obstacle to the Cowboys heading into their bye week with a perfect record. And then, of course, vote on it!
Week 1 @ Washington
2009 Record: 4-12
Sunday, September 12 at 7:20PM (NBC)
These are hardly the same Redskins that went 4-12 during 2009. McNabb will be facing the Cowboys for the third straight time in games that count. This could be a statement game for him and Head Coach Mike Shanahan. Defeating a division rival in the season opener could go a long way towards digging out of the NFC East's basement.
The offense must prove that its veteran free agent signings (RBs Larry Johnson and Willie Parker; WRs Mike Furrey and Joey Galloway) can get on the same page with the offense that Shanahan is installing. They also have to find chemistry with incumbent starters Clinton Portis and Chris Cooley.
Along with adding names to the offensive backfield, Shanahan has also been shuffling around the offensive line. The recent trade for the Saints' RT Jamaal Brown has provided him even more options.
Brown could be the solution at right tackle for the Redskins, who are rebuilding the line under new coach Mike Shanahan after last year's 4-12 season.
Washington took Trent Williams of Oklahoma with the No. 4 overall pick in April's draft to replace retired six-time Pro Bowl left tackle Chris Samuels. Artis Hicks has worked with the first-string unit at right tackle during the offseason, but he could move to right guard to make room for Brown.
The defense, on the other hand, was stout last season, ranking in the top-10 in both overall yards allowed and passing yards. And despite all the talk, DT Albert Haynesworth says he will be in training camp with the team.
When last they met...

Week 2 Home vs. Chicago
2009 Record: 7-9
Sunday, September 19 at 12PM (FOX)
The Bears made two of the early big splashes in free agency when they signed DE Julius Peppers and RB Chester Taylor early in March. Peppers, one of the better players in the league at his position, was brought in to help a Bears defense that ranked in the middle of the league in terms of yards allowed (337.8 ypg). The veteran back, Taylor, should provide a nice complement to third-year pro Matt Forte, who had a bit of a sophomore slump in 2009.
Chicago had a very thin draft because of the trade for QB Jay Cutler. Cutler, as many of us saw, struggled in connecting with his receivers last season and led the league in INTs.
Before the Cowboys' defensive backs start licking their chops, they may have to pick Jon Kitna's brain in regards to the Bears' new Mike Martz-led offensive gameplan. Martz, a coordinator known for his passing attack, is now in charge of revamping not only the offense, but Cutler's decision-making process as well.
Martz's offense emphasizes deeper quarterback drops and passes to spots on the field rather than throwing directly at receivers.
"It is a little bit different," Cutler said. "It's a high-paced, high-octane offense. Guys are flying around. Quarterbacks have to make quick, precise decisions, and you have to be really accurate with the ball. It puts a lot on the quarterback, puts a lot on the receivers."
Cutler led the NFL with 26 interceptions in 2009, his first season with the Bears while playing in a different offense. However, he expects the entire offense to understand the new attack by the July 29 reporting date for training camp.

Week 3 @ Houston
2009 Record: 9-7
Sunday, September 26 at 12PM (FOX)
Will there be enough blue & silver at Reliant Stadium to make this seem like a home game to the Cowboys? It won't matter if the defense doesn't keep Texans QB Matt Schaub and WR Andre Johnson in check. Along with TE Owen Daniels, WR Kevin Walter, and RBs Steve Slaton and second-round pick Ben Tate, the Dallas defenders should prepare for a busy day. Behind Schaub, the Texans led the league with nearly 291 passing yards per game, but ranked 30th in rushing (92.2).
The defense was okay (13th in the league in total yards allowed), but they will be missing Defensive Rookie-Of-the-Year, Brian Cushing, because of a suspension. Mario Williams will be looking to terrorize the Cowboys offensive tackles, and those special teams coverage units need to contain dangerous return man Jacoby Jones.
Dallas may want to try to control the clock with the running game; although, this one has all the makings of an old-fashioned Texas shootout!

After the bye, the rest of the Cowboys schedule looks rather daunting. They will face Tennessee, then head back up to Minnesota, and then come home to face the Giants over the three games after their bye. That's brutal.
It's imperative Dallas gets off to a fast start in 2010. Washington, Chicago, and Houston are all winnable games. Can't assume they'll run through all three though. That's, of course, why they play the game.
0 recs |
59 comments
|
Comments
I second that
I wasn’t really sure how to answer this one. Two – Wash and Chi – are going to be very different looking teams and arguably better. The third, the Texans, have been a good but not great team. Their offense has carried them, but the Dallas defense is on an upswing so that might be negated.
In the end, the Washington defense matches up well against Dallas and those games are always tough, so with what figures to be a real offense, the Skins game figures to be the most difficult.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
My thoughts exactly
division rules…but that said, i think Texans will be tough this year
June & July Blow
by jgoddard8409 on Jun 27, 2010 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions
I'll third that.
One thing, Aaron. Saw a piece on the Bears last week. Lovie sighted the wide open offense as part of the problem last season. He has vowed to get back to the Bears pounding the rock. With Forte, Bell, Peterson, and the rook Wolfe, I think he’s serious. Of course, you don’t bring in Martz to run the football, so just what the hell Lovie is doing is..well, strange.
When I die I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my Grandfather -- not screaming like the passengers in his car.
yeah i wasn't that sure as well
first i was ready to pull the trigger on texans in a second but after thinking a bit i thought redskins and bears will be very different and maybe hard teams (hope not)
Yeah, Skins by default
Always seems to be a hard fought contest.
I kind of think the Bears would be hard if Dallas caught them later in the season, but I figure they will still be ironing the kinks out of the new offense.
Texans defense is still too suspect without Cushing and starting a rookie at CB against Dallas, even if they manage to put up 28 pts, I think Dallas could put up 40.
Dez Bryant, Miles Austin, Jason Witten, Felix Jones = defensive coordinator's Kobayashi Maru scenario
One at a Time
Houston is better than pretty good on both sides of the ball so I chose them out of the three. I would hope, and believe, that the Boys will take this season one game, and one play at a time. No hurry to get to the Bye week now as there is much to enjoy before then starting with seeing who makes this years squad.
Excellent writers along with well schooled fan posts makes this a super site. I am greatful.
Bill
I voted Redskins
It worries me that Dallas won’t have much of a scouting report on the Skins when we play them. Preparation is a huge part of winning, so the Skins have the upper hand there. Plus they usually play Dallas close, even when they’re bad.
I feel like these are conflicting ideas
"I definitely lead the league in weird injuries. I'm embarrassed, really. Somebody asks you why you came out and you say, 'Um, I was dizzy.' And then they ask you again and you say, 'I think I got something in my eye.' I'd much rather be run over, that's more manly." -- C Jarrod Saltalamacchia, on the pair of strange injuries (dizziness, eye irritation) that have forced him to miss time this season.
by fightnirish220 on Jun 28, 2010 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Houston, we'll have a problem.
They always play us well. Skins will be in part one of getting used to playing with the new faces and new scheme. Bears are an unknown quantity at this point but I like our chances.
"The greatest test of courage on earth is to bear defeat without losing heart."
It's the NFL, they're all tough
I’ll pick Washington for the rivalry factor and because as others have said they’re tendancies won’t be clear when the Cowboys play them. I just hope McNabb gets knocked around early. That always makes my day.
by StillHateTheGiants on Jun 27, 2010 10:43 PM CDT reply actions
They are all winnable, but...
Texans are the toughest of the three and we play them away.
But I think the Redskins may be the biggest risk of a loss:
- this rivalvry has always gone against the trend. We beat them when they are on top and they return the favour when we are strong.
- we are playing them in the first game of the year – probably THE worst game to play them. They are changing both O and D so they are going to be extremely difficult to prepare for. That should mean their execution is much worse but they may be hot early until teams figure out exactly what they are doing. I think ultimately they will suck for the season overall, but it wouldn’t shock me if they are winning for their first few games.
I don’t fear Chicago. Its a home game and I think Martz’s system simply means Culter’s will accumulate his interceptions that much faster. Hopefully we finally have a def backfield that can snag some!
So Redskins for me.
"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson
All 3 teams good to have early
We’re fortunate with this part of the schedule, because the first 2 teams are both installing new systems, I’d expect them to be a bit less polished than our guys should be out of the gate, and I think that gives us an edge (in addition to just being a better team).
I agree with Oz, Redskins games are always unpredictable, even when we think we should beat them you can’t count on anything, and now with the combo of McNabb and a new system, who knows what to expect. But I’d say playing @ Wash the first weak is actually ideal to try to take advantage of them being in transition and pick up a division road win. It may be harder to plan for them, but that’s always the case somewhat with the first game, and every team changes up their offense enough that you can’t count on tape from last season to plan too much. I’d say them trying to learn a new system is a bigger disadvantage than us trying to plan for it.
also good to play the Bears early, installing new system and who knows whether Cutler and Martz will mix, hopefully get some INTs to get our takeaways rolling… need to win this one at home.
The Texans we’re also fortunate to play early because Cushing is out. They are a dangerous team with a quality QB and some potent weapons who always seem to be on the verge of contending, and I expect them to be good this season. Could be a tough road game and I give them the vote as the most challenging.
I'd say the Tex-anns, they have a decent team (mental issues handicap them) and they treat every game with
dallas like their own playoff game; so based on that they will probably be playing the game like a reg. season one.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
Sorry Aaron, for some strange reason I thought I was reading this as the preseason schedule.
The Tex-anns will definitely treat the reg season game like a playoff game, especially since they won’t make it this year either.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
Yes, really
I cannot stand their fanbase, here in Corpus all they live to see dallas lose, because of the minority of fans that drive them nuts or the fact that they do not like the team because of JJ. I never had a problem with the oilers, or their fans, because the team had a long history like dallas; this new team has a new fanbase that is comprised of 35-45% of people who do not like dallas but need a team to support. So it is a t-shirt fanbase, down here in Corpus there is a radio show that has their own tex-anns post game show. Last I remember that team has one done in their city on 610 AM, just like dallas has radio covereage before, during, and after the game. The radio station in this town and the minority fan base here are pushing this team on a city that is primarily cowboys fans.
Sorry to rant, but I hate that I have to hear anything about this team in my town, and I would be open to a different name that makes fun of this generic team.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
I'm just sayin...
There has got to be something more creative than Tex-anns… that’s just stupid.
And sorry to hear you live in the armpit of Texas. How’s the humidity down there?
No offense taken, this year has been better than last year, at least we are getting some rain, and the humidity is not
been less unlike last year.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
Some thoughts
These 3 opponents all seem at least a little challenging, but I guess you’d say that about almost any team in the league. All 3 have notable pass rushers on the end (Peppers, Super-Mario, and Orakpo), but nobody would call these defenses frightening. The Cowboys should be able to score.
What is a bit worrisome is that we’ve got Shanahan in Week 1. He is one of the best coaches in the past few decades at scripting an offensive gameplan and planning for a specific defensive opponent. Wade’s defense will have their hands’ full with whatever he comes up with— I think we can expect a significantly superior offensive approach compared to what we’ve seen from the Skins in recent years. Whether or not the players can execute that approach is another story, of course.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
we should only have concerns
with texas they can score but thats about it….i feel confident playing a good shannahan team and this is not one of them…and we should wack the bears…martz loves to pass and wade loves to bring the heat so i’d put my money on wade winning that one….besides our offence should rip the bears a new one….
I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....
OK, who are the 106 Bears fans trolling our site?
I voted Redskins, they’ll be the 2nd best team in our division this year, and have Shanahan to go along with a tough D.
I can see why most people think Houston will be tougher, they’re a tough team.
But the Bears?? C’mon
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
lol
I love all these people who jumped on the Redskins bandwagon this offseason. Pick up a veteran coach, an old QB on the decline, and a handful of RB’s that are years past their prime and you magically go from a 4-12 team to a playoff contender.
well there is that oddity in the NFL
every year what is it 5 or 6 teams that werent even contenders become playoff bound the following year
Really?! Really?!
I have a hard time seeing the Redskins be the one this year.
They’re completely changing everything. New defense, new offense, new quarterback. One of their best defensive players is being a whiny little bastard. That team will be a mess. They could well improve on last year, but I don’t think they’re a threat to do anything in the division.
True
but with playing them week 1 with no flim.. makes them the toughest opp not to mention they are the skins who are in the nfc east toughest div in football for a reason
Really?! Really?!
they have plenty of film of McNabb
The rest of their offense is pedestrian at best.
In Romo we Trust
But do they have a lot of film on McNabb...
in a Kyle Shanahan offense?
Do they have recent film of Trent Williams and Jamaal Brown playing their current positions and in a Shanahan system? Do they know for sure how they’re going to use all of those RB’s of yester-years? Do they know for sure that all of those RB’s are indeed over the hill and of no threat in a Shanahan offense?
There are a lot on unknowns going into that game…just like when we played Tampa last season. Wade had to guess at what he though they might do. I remember the first half of that game not being too pretty.
Rabid and luvin' it
All that being said....
Dallas should beat them.
A defense switching to a 3-4 without the personell to run it. 3 over the hill runningbacks and a QB that Dallas really owned the last two times.
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 29, 2010 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
We should beat them. But, saying we have film on McNabb doesn’t mean it’s going to necessarily be easy. They played us pretty tough the first time we played them last season. And we had plenty of film on their offense going into that game.LOL
Rabid and luvin' it
by lonewolfz28 on Jun 29, 2010 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Considering Washington scored
6 points in 2 games against us last year, I don’t think we have too much to worry about.
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Jun 30, 2010 2:45 AM CDT up reply actions
Should still be a form of the WC system McNabb has been playing in
what I think will be more different for the defense is the zone blocking. Of course it’lll also be different for the Skins line.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
The Washington game scares me the most....
And after that one, the Chicago game will have be worried, and after that one, the Texans game will keep me up late on the Saturday before……
Then I’ll start thinking the bye is too damn soon.
And then…..
Anomoly............Finally here.........
In Washington is always the toughest game on the schedule.
First – this is still the prime rivalry for both teams. The form charts seem never to be followed in our games against this team.
Second point – Washington comes first and we have to consider the next game our toughest game every week.
Nice work Aaron. I always appreciate the video touches.
Week 1 is always a crapshoot
Very unpredictable.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
Also a good point
Dallas’s defense played rather poorly in the TB opener last year. The worst week to try and pick games
Dez Bryant, Miles Austin, Jason Witten, Felix Jones = defensive coordinator's Kobayashi Maru scenario
I hate predictions
This is a good article, but I just have to throw my cynical two cents in. If there was a spot on the ballot for “nobody has a clue which team will be the toughest to beat,” then and only then would I have voted. Here are some of the reasons why there’s about an equal chance for each team:
- The Any Given Sunday principle: in a league with a great deal of parity and a small number of games, you can only generally say the better team will win. Each individual game is usually not a lot more predictable than a coin flip.
- Injuries: case in point, Dallas gets ass handed to self by a same ol’ lousy Rams because Romo’s hurt. Other injuries have less of an impact, but always throw the balance off.
- Momentum: sometimes teams are just hot. Could be the Bears, could be the Redskins, could be the Texans. Any of those teams could win their first few games just because they happen to start the season hot. Think how unstoppable Denver looked to start last year.
- Different year, different team: 2010 predictions are almost entirely based on how 2009 ended. Gimme a break. It’s hard enough to predict how the same group of guys will play the very next week. Between seasons, the rosters change, the staff changes, the players change, etc. Even the very same guy will simply be in a different place in his life by the time the next season rolls around. If his name is Vick, that place could be jail. (sorry)
- Breakfast cereal: some days, you’re just on. There’s no telling whether the Bears, Redskins, or Texans will wake up gameday morning and just have it that day. Steve Young called a TD play in a Super Bowl because he saw the same play work on TV earlier that day. This one is related to my first point, and thus, the circle is complete.
Agreed
but it’s not like we have money on this poll. It is a poll for discussion. And after all isn’t that what about 90% of analysis is?
"I definitely lead the league in weird injuries. I'm embarrassed, really. Somebody asks you why you came out and you say, 'Um, I was dizzy.' And then they ask you again and you say, 'I think I got something in my eye.' I'd much rather be run over, that's more manly." -- C Jarrod Saltalamacchia, on the pair of strange injuries (dizziness, eye irritation) that have forced him to miss time this season.
by fightnirish220 on Jun 28, 2010 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions
*At least among fans
"I definitely lead the league in weird injuries. I'm embarrassed, really. Somebody asks you why you came out and you say, 'Um, I was dizzy.' And then they ask you again and you say, 'I think I got something in my eye.' I'd much rather be run over, that's more manly." -- C Jarrod Saltalamacchia, on the pair of strange injuries (dizziness, eye irritation) that have forced him to miss time this season.
by fightnirish220 on Jun 28, 2010 9:51 PM CDT up reply actions
analysis and predictions are very different activities
I love analysis. It helps me understand the game better. Predictions are worthless and take up valuable time and space that could be devoted to analysis :)
by speedmetal on Jun 28, 2010 11:13 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Dude....
BTB has 4 regular writers and it’s the end of June. OCC has analyzed everything from the average yards that offensive lineman contribute too almost to if the jockstrap really does add or subtract speed(he didn’t really do that one, but I’m sure he has that in his bag of tricks.)
It’s just a fun little poll that makes everyone look foward to a season that is still too far away.
Anything said above is purely the opinion of AFB unless said otherwise.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jun 29, 2010 7:40 AM CDT up reply actions
I guess, in a way, I was trying to find out why everyone else finds this fun while I just find it highly irritating.
Ideally analysis should lead to prediction
or it’s a wasted exercise. I think what is rubbing you wrong is that this is more guessing than predicting because not enough data is in. By the end of training camp and the preseason it’ll be more meaningful, and by week six of next season, we’ll havemuch more of a basis to predict match-ups.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
You have to pay for that kind of psychoanalysis
But nice try
Dez Bryant, Miles Austin, Jason Witten, Felix Jones = defensive coordinator's Kobayashi Maru scenario
That sounds like a lot of analysis about predictions there based on a lot of what-ifs.
Sure any team can be beat by any other team, but the good teams handle those the-football-is-shaped-funny games moreso than not. The Cowboys beat the Saints, but the Saints beat the Vikings, who just beat the Cowboys, and then went on to win the Super Bowl.
Very key, though, is that the Saints were good all season and lost to a pretty darn good team when they finally did end up losing one. They had an early bye week like the Cowboys have this year. My guess is that coaches look at these bye weeks to help break up goals for the team’s season. While the Saints and Colts won going into and coming out of their bye weeks, those Broncos that you mentioned lost their momentum at their bye week.
The Cowboys gained momentum going into their bye week with the OT win against the Chiefs, but at 3-2 they were nowhere near the position the SuperBowl participants had set themselves up for going in.
I know it’s only three games, but Dallas has a nice opportunity this season to take an undefeated record into their bye, and then fine-tune things during that week to buckle down and hit full steam ahead for the rest of their grueling season. Honestly, I don’t think they can afford a loss to any of these teams. Home-field in the playoffs should be the goal—the next step—for this team to consider itself championship caliber.
Trust them...they know what they're doing.
by Aaron Novinger on Jun 28, 2010 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions
That right there
is some excellent analysis on the significance of the bye week in a team’s season :) I just have a pet peeve about predictions. If you had worded the question, “Which of our first 3 opponents looks toughest to beat right now?,” then I probably wouldn’t have reacted that way. I think we can beat any team in the league. I think we’re right up there with the best of them. And if I had to put some money on it, I suppose I’d say the Redskins, but there’s really no telling.
I Voted Texans
I think of them as the Texas Aggies to us, the Texas Longhorns. Trying to knock off the big dog in the state. I also think that the Texans defense is in the best shape to upset the ‘Boys. Haynesworth is a huge cancer with the Redskins, and doesn’t it always seem that there are problems in the locker room (more than the usual NFL team) ever since Daniel Snyder took over?
"I definitely lead the league in weird injuries. I'm embarrassed, really. Somebody asks you why you came out and you say, 'Um, I was dizzy.' And then they ask you again and you say, 'I think I got something in my eye.' I'd much rather be run over, that's more manly." -- C Jarrod Saltalamacchia, on the pair of strange injuries (dizziness, eye irritation) that have forced him to miss time this season.
Like I always say.
We will win what games our offensive line wins. If they turn out to be black holes of suckitude it really won’t matter which team is tougher than the others. Wins will be especially hard to come by.
Texas: Where God goes to relax.
Unless he's watching the Cowboys.
I'm not convinced by Cutler
I see him as a mediocre QB, and I know some people will tell me it’s all about the system, but that’s basically the same B.S. that Roy Williams tells us, too.
The biggest concern will be Schaub-to-Johnson.
Before you ask why I'm a fan of both the Cowboys and Jets, I'll just say the answer is complicated and that it just turned out that way.
It's not those 1st 3 games that will matter; It's the 12 after without a break.
I picked Washington, because thats the only one that really counts.
Really we aren't playing on Thanksgiving?
Man, just took it for granted: Maybe I should look at the schedule again.
Haha!
no, he means Dallas gets an extra three days off because they play on Turkey Day. So it’s a mini-bye for the following week…
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
If we were playing the Raiders or some other weak team...
then I’d consider it more of a “Bye”. But, I suspect after playing the Saints after a short week, we’ll need every one of those extra days before going to Indy. That’s going to be a tough stretch.
Rabid and luvin' it
by lonewolfz28 on Jun 29, 2010 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Actually it works out pretty well for us
NO isn’t used to the extra short week (although Sean Payton would know how Dallas does things to prep), that give DAL the advantage in that one. Then they get extra time to get ready for Manning, and check out Indy’s schedule leading up to the game at PHI, CIN, at NE, SD, then DAL (talk about a brutal stretch)
Dez Bryant, Miles Austin, Jason Witten, Felix Jones = defensive coordinator's Kobayashi Maru scenario
Here's how I see it:
a) The Washington game will be a nice dress rehearsal for our defense as they prepare for the Week 3 match up with Houston since both teams run Mike Shanahan’s version of the West Coast Offense.
1) Passing Offense [Houston will be really tough here]
—play action off the stretch play, bootlegs to get the deep bombs
—heavy dose of passes to the tight end over the middle of the field
—the occasional swing pass to fullbacks and running backs
(expect more of these from Houston, as Slaton is a better receiver, so on that note expect screens as well).
—Look for more shotgun/spread formations from Houston as their offensive line isn’t as strong as Washington’s.
2) Rushing Offense [Washington will probably give us the best challenge here]
—stretch plays to the strong side
—counters to the weak side
—quick tosses and pitches to the open field
—look for traditional I formation/off balance I sets as they get closer and closer to the goal line
—I’d expect to see a lot of single back formations, especially from the Texans.
Overall, because Schaub is a much more accurate passer than McNabb, and because that Houston offense will be in its 3-4th year under Kubiak, I’d expect to see Houston employ 60-40 Pass:Run ratio. On the other hand, I’d expect to see a more balanced approach from Washington, which means Washington will probably use more play action against us. Still the plays and the formations should be pretty much the same. As always, it will be the snap counts, and the line calls for audibles which will be different. In my opinion the Redskins game should be the toughest. However, I’d expect to see us go 2-0 here.
b) Surprisingly, I am more worried about the Bears game because the last two times we faced Mike Martz’s teams we played like ass (both games against the Lions). And while we do have Roy Williams and Jon Kitna to shed light on the Martz attack, the scary part about that offense (when it is run correctly) is that it’s very similar to Steve Nash’s offense with the Phoenix Suns. You have no idea what they will run from one play to the next, and not only do you have to guess what routes are being called, but DBs also have to decipher whether or not the receivers will break their routes. All you do know is that they want to throw down field. Given all this plus the fact you have no idea which Cutler will show up from 1 game to the next, I can easily see us losing this one only because the defense gets gassed from having to defend the pass most of the time, and because I worry, that Jason might get sucked into a passing contest and neglect the running game when this is the game to employ a heavy dose of it.
Why do i look at Popivich with a arm around a player talking with 2 minutes left, and get jealous?
by semsemma on Mar 10, 2010 8:00 PM PST
by Rohpuri on Jul 1, 2010 5:00 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs

by 



























