Position Battles: Dallas Cowboys On The Bubble (Offense)
I've decided to forgo the "traditional" 53-man roster prediction this week, instead opting to take a look at the younger players that have likely earned a spot on the team already, those that are on the bubble and those that are facing the Turk come next week.
With just one preseason game left and less than two weeks before the official start of the season, the Cowboys will have to go from 75 players down to 53 by Saturday; not much time to make 22 cuts after the game against Miami. To get to the mandatory 75 this afternoon, the Cowboys already released Pat Watkins, Terrell Hudgins and Scott Sicko.
After the jump, I take a look at the players fighting for a roster spot and what I believe to be their standing heading into Thursday night's game. I've left out the obvious choices to make the team; no sense in discussing Roy Williams here. I've also listed who I believe the Cowboys should target for the practice squad.
First up: the offense.
Offense
Quarterback
On the bubble - Stephen McGee
If Stephen McGee doesn't have at least a somewhat decent game against Miami, in which he'll get the chance to play significant time with the second team and even some of the first teamers, then it seems as if the Cowboys could be preparing to move on. While you don't like to see a team give up on a 4th round pick so quickly, especially a quarterback that was known to be a project, the Cowboys are facing tough decisions at other positions that could turn the numbers game against McGee.
He has the tools: he's athletic, he's accurate and he has a strong arm. The problem is between the ears, as he's yet to show any confidence in himself and has not been aggressive downfield at all. Is that because of the offensive line in front of him? Perhaps, but he'll have a shot on Thursday to prove he belongs on this team for at least one more season.
Running Back
Here comes the Turk - Herb Donaldson, Lonyae Miller
There have been flashes at times from Miller but there was no way that either of these two would supplant the Jones, Barber and Choice on the roster. On Thursday, it's going to be a battle for the practice squad.
Fullback:
Safe - Deon Anderson, Chris Gronkowski
After watching the game against the Texans, and getting what limited data I could from Jason Garrett's offensive formations, I'm more convinced than ever that the Cowboys will roll with two tight ends and two fullbacks. Gronkowski was one of the bright spots from Saturday night and has shown the ability to catch, block and run with the ball. If anything, he might be pushing Deon Anderson.
Tight End:
On the bubble - Martin Rucker
Here comes the Turk -DajLeon Farr, Jason Pociask
Could Rucker supplant Gronkowski as the team's third TE, and FB-HB hybrid? I doubt it, but I still think he's getting the chance to do so. He's experienced (somewhat) but it's tough to think that with Gronkowski getting so many first-team reps on Saturday night against Houston that he's going anywhere. Farr and Pociask were nothing but camp bodies.
Wide Receiver
Safe - Sam Hurd, Kevin Ogletree
Here comes the Turk - Jesse Holley, Manuel Johnson
This was the toughest decision I had to make. Is Ogletree on the bubble? Is Hurd? Both had decent games against Houston (relatively) and with Patrick Watkins being released you have to think that Coach D will want at least some of his special teams staples back this season. Both Hurd and Ogletree are more than capable on coverage and return teams and I doubt the Cowboys are willing to give up on Ogletree's potential this season.
Offensive Line:
Safe - Phil Costa, Robert Brewster
On the bubble - Sam Young, Travis Bright
Here comes the Turk - Mike Tepper, Pat McQuistan, Will Barker
The only reason I feel that Young isn't safe and that Bright might still have a chance is the fact that the Cowboys will have just one backup OG going into Washington, and he's likely going to start. As it is, Bright is the only other guard that has shown promise. Brewster is set to be the swing tackle behind Alex Barron, Costa is the backup center, and Young is another tackle. The numbers will make this one interesting and I fear that Young may be the victim. His injury certainly doesn't help matters, even if the Cowboys love his tenacity and his poise.
Practice squad candidates: Lonyae Miller, Sam Young, Jesse Holley, Travis Bright
75 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Agree on McGee
there will be better QBs out there on the wavier wire if we need them.
I am still holding out hope that we will find a capable guard on the wavier wire.
If some team ,like St. Louis, needs a WR maybe Hurd could be traded for an O lineman.
I think you are pretty much spot on with the predictions.
by TCB Orange Dino on Aug 31, 2010 7:12 PM CDT reply actions
They can afford to let Hurd go
now that the Special Teams play is being picked up by the likes of Church, McCray and possibly McCann—who also is a better return man than Hurd could ever be. No way they go 6 Wrs with the other needs at safety, OL, and possibly TE. So it’s Olgletree over Hurd for the 5th WR spot. Even if they let McGee go, they still could use that spot for the positons already mentioned or for a Leon Wms or Steve Octavien for more ILB depth and STs play.
Can I assume that you think the Cowboys might only carry two QBs?
There doesn’t seem to be anything to gain from cutting McGee and then signing another backup, so I believe I am reading that you are saying the team might drop McGee to carry someone else on the 53.
If I’m right, then where do you think that extra spot might be used?
The new mantra: No more injuries. No more injuries. Everybody now: NO MORE INJURIES!
Yeah.
I’m thinking it’s possible they just go with 2 QBs. I believe either that extra spot goes to WR, or most likely goes to keeping an extra LBer.
One of the last Joe Nieuwendyk supporters in Dallas....
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis; SB Nation Dallas-Fort Worth
by Brandon Worley on Aug 31, 2010 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Thanks
I know that they went through one season without a third QB – just a couple or three years ago, if my memory is correct (always a risky proposition).
The new mantra: No more injuries. No more injuries. Everybody now: NO MORE INJURIES!
2008.
Went with just 2 QBs, then signed Brooks Bollinger in the middle of the season.
One of the last Joe Nieuwendyk supporters in Dallas....
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis; SB Nation Dallas-Fort Worth
by Brandon Worley on Aug 31, 2010 10:24 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree with you BW, I think this game is a big, big test for McGee
If he fails miserably, I guess he’s gone. Which means either the scouts blew it and we wasted a relatively high pick (#101), or they were right, but he’s not far enough along to prove them right.
All I know is he’s better than he was last pre-season, yet not as far along as hoped by the coaches (I’ve seen some better QB prospects this pre-season that could be cut by their teams.) So if it’s about the roster spot, I’d be in favor of making room for a guy like say McCann, and hope they can try to get McGee onto the PS (I think he’s eligible). It would be a shame to see the pick and investment go to waste.
Thank you #22, for everything you did for the Cowboys. There will never be another one like you.
A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma
What if:
What if Jason Garrett makes McGee stink up the joint against the Dolphins on purpose in order to be able to stash him safely on the practice squad. Or have I been watching too many X-files reruns?
by One.Cool.Customer on Sep 1, 2010 4:55 AM CDT up reply actions
You can never watch too many X-file reruns
But as far as conspiracy theories go, this one is WAY out there. As much flak as Garrett has been taking for the miserable offensive performance, I can’t see him encouraging McGee to take one for the team.
Thank you #22, for everything you did for the Cowboys. There will never be another one like you.
3 QBs is unnecessary
If Kitna and Romo go down, it won’t matter who’se back there. We could always grab that kid from training camp we cut.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Aug 31, 2010 10:09 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
The 3rd QB is a development position only
Even if he was kept as the 3rd QB, there is very little chance he would see the field this season. The team would likely still go find a vet if Romo and Kitna went down. It’s strictly to keep him from being subjected to waivers, like Matt Moore.
Thank you #22, for everything you did for the Cowboys. There will never be another one like you.
I'd hate to see Young go
I’m starting to like him a lot. Brewster could play G in a pinch of they needed him to. I see them keeping 10 OL, Free, Kosier, Gurode, Davis, Colombo, Brewster, Young, Barron and Costa. Kosier will be back for Washington, leaving Holland, Costa and Brewster as game day reserves.
"I just wrote the check, it's up to you guys to cash it!" - Jimmy Johnson to defense after failed attempt on 4th down deep inside Cowboy territory. AND THEY DID!!!!
If Holland doesn't have a better game.....
he should go.
Well...that's not going to happen.
One of the last Joe Nieuwendyk supporters in Dallas....
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis; SB Nation Dallas-Fort Worth
by Brandon Worley on Aug 31, 2010 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions
i agree it won't, but why not?
Holland doesn’t really fit the typical mold of a Cowboys O Lineman. Why is the coaching staff so in love with him?
because he's our only adequate backup guard, thats why
There is nothing but garbage behind him
In Romo we Trust
is this even a serious comment
Let’s say Kossier isn’t back for the season opener.
You want to cut Holland and have who exactly play instead?
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Aug 31, 2010 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions
no no no no no
I am NOT saying by any means Holland should be cut. I was just curious to know what the coaching staff sees in him? He is servicable and I am not complaining, but the other night he looked tiny out there next to our other OL. It isn’t our typical OL type, in regards to size and weight. He came from the old Denver system where everyone was small and quick.
Are you sure you're talking about Holland?
Because Holland is freaking FAT. He’s one huge guy.
One of the last Joe Nieuwendyk supporters in Dallas....
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis; SB Nation Dallas-Fort Worth
by Brandon Worley on Aug 31, 2010 9:28 PM CDT up reply actions
He was with the Saints before DEN
He didn’t fit the Broncos ZB scheme. Just look at him, he looks like a miniature sumo wrestler.
Thank you #22, for everything you did for the Cowboys. There will never be another one like you.
Ha, probably the wrong adjective there
Thank you #22, for everything you did for the Cowboys. There will never be another one like you.
Tiny?....
Try 30 pounds overweight. Couldn’t keep up was what i saw. Stunts went right by him.
L Davis wiffed completely also, several times.
a better word would have been short, obviously
he must have been standing next to A Barron or something.
64 Montrae Holland G 30 6-2 326 8 Florida State
71 Alex Barron OT 27 6-8 316 6 Florida State
I know he is fat. Interesting per Wikipedia , , , , ,
Holland was born with a defect in his right leg which he had corrected in seventh grade. They had to break his leg and fuse his growth plates together on both legs which stunned his growth which made it so he couldn’t grow anymore.
Ha ha..
Ok, that makes more sense. Yeah, he’s relatively short for an O-lineman.
One of the last Joe Nieuwendyk supporters in Dallas....
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis; SB Nation Dallas-Fort Worth
by Brandon Worley on Aug 31, 2010 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions
initially what i was trying to ask
a few years ago we traded for Holland, i believe? then we didn’t resign him, only to bring him in later.
is there anything in particular that draws the Coaching staff to this guy. Like we have discussed at great length, he is fat and older and doesn’t appear to provide much other than a warm body.
was just hoping for a little insight from this obviously wise group.
He's solid
And he’s generally better than most backup options at interior lineman. He’s started 16 games before in the past.
Generally, he’s not going to do anything great. He won’t do anything horrible either. He’s just…there. Which is about all you can ask for from your backup up, veteran guard.
One of the last Joe Nieuwendyk supporters in Dallas....
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis; SB Nation Dallas-Fort Worth
by Brandon Worley on Aug 31, 2010 9:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Have you seen the guys behind Holland?
When your depth is Corey Proctor and McQuistan going into training camp, that explains why he’s still around.
A player’s worth to a team is worth exactly as much as the difference between him and the team’s next best option.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Aug 31, 2010 10:15 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Very good points.
Should hve added that in. “He’s beter than the other options on this team.”
One of the last Joe Nieuwendyk supporters in Dallas....
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis; SB Nation Dallas-Fort Worth
by Brandon Worley on Aug 31, 2010 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions
indeed, and Oline is like QB in the NFL, scarce
there aren’t enough quality players to go around, so quality depth is rare and there aren’t a lot of FAs floating around. Every team deals with this. So just having a veteran guy who has played the position and can step in and do a halfway decent job has value, while you work on your projects and hope one or two of them will hit and eventually join Free among the next generation of starters.
my comment was directed towards Cwon1 ...
If Holland doesn’t have a better game….. he should go.
is this even a serious comment
Let’s say Kossier isn’t back for the season opener.
You want to cut Holland and have who exactly play instead?
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 1, 2010 7:25 AM CDT up reply actions
FITAT
If you’ve been reading cwon1’s comments lately, you’ll know that it is serious. I know… I know..
AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.
Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.
The Cowboys and many of the fans.....
are caught up in status quo orthodoxy. Why are all these minor trades going on and this team sits on its hands?
It isn’t going to change with that policy.
I can see how it’s hard to decide to give 20 million down on 8 million per year for 7 years. Finding restricted guys on the bench of other teams when you have some talent to trade? Not as hard.
The oline culture starts in the front office, it encourages it. Other than Free there are no fresh players and think if Columbo hadn’t been hurt? Free would have been the same as McQuistan in terms of actual production.
49's....
Have 4 centers and 4 guards, how does that work?
If they make a trade away cheap from Dallas I will disappointed again in the front office. There are other teams with surplus as well.
You have no realization how trades work in the NFL.
AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.
Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.
Really?
are you saying all those players are staying in SF? They’ll carry 13 olinemen?
You think it’s going to pan out well with the current waiver position?
All players on any bench are equal or worse than McQuistan, Holland, Bright, Costa just to focus on backup inside olinemen?
I’m all for a waiver pickup as well but out perhaps 40+ inside line cuts the odds the team would pickup the best scouted commodity is slim to none. They should trade.
your frustration with the state of the line is understandable...
but your solutions I’m not so sure about… I don’t believe we can find better than Holland in other team’s trash bins… nor do I believe the winner of Bright or Costa should be relegated to PS so we can bring in someone else’s castaways.
Original Pet-Cats: Duane Thomas, Roger Staubach, Walt Garrison, Charlie Waters, Bob Lilly
I have to think the staff is looking at this
The team is not going to go for anyone unless they are a clear upgrade over someone on the team now. At least the linemen we have know the offense and their teammates.
The new mantra: No more injuries. No more injuries. Everybody now: NO MORE INJURIES!
Where the hell is Raf?
Haven’t been on in a few weeks. Is he gone cause he’s no longer listed as a writer? I’ve been following his stuff since The Boys Blog, and have no desire to come back here if he’s not part of this one.
He started his new site, CowboysNation.com
One of the last Joe Nieuwendyk supporters in Dallas....
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis; SB Nation Dallas-Fort Worth
by Brandon Worley on Aug 31, 2010 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions
adios
Thank you #22, for everything you did for the Cowboys. There will never be another one like you.
if you scrolled far enough down to see hes no longer a writer then you should of saw the post about what happened
later dude
Really?! Really?!
Please, please, please stay. Every one of your 57 comments have been incredibly insightful
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/
by Seanrude on Sep 1, 2010 8:10 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
LOL
the two sights will no-doubt share lots of folks … we’ll miss anyone that leaves … some more’n udders.
Original Pet-Cats: Duane Thomas, Roger Staubach, Walt Garrison, Charlie Waters, Bob Lilly
Have you missed Tex yet? Really?
The new mantra: No more injuries. No more injuries. Everybody now: NO MORE INJURIES!
I agree that McGee needs to show something
if he’s going to be the 3rd QB. And I think there are others out there at least as capable as he right now, like the Nichols kid they cut.
But I think it would be highly unusual for them not to carry 3 QBs, even if the third only does clipboard duty, if for no other reason than if Romo goes down, then you only have one QB. Counting on him to take every snap again is pretty risky.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
Cowboys rolled with 2 QBs in 2008.
It’s not ideal, but teams do it.
One of the last Joe Nieuwendyk supporters in Dallas....
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis; SB Nation Dallas-Fort Worth
by Brandon Worley on Aug 31, 2010 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Besides..
If Romo goes down for any significant amount of time…..it doesn’t matter who the 3rd QB is.
One of the last Joe Nieuwendyk supporters in Dallas....
Defending Big D - Dallas Stars news & analysis; SB Nation Dallas-Fort Worth
by Brandon Worley on Aug 31, 2010 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions
yes, teams have gone with 2 QBs, and it's not ideal, especially if you have designs on a Super Bowl
If the Cowboys are sitting at 6-4 with a game lead in the division and Romo goes down for a couple of weeks so that Kitna has to play, are they really supposed to bring somebody off the street who doesn’t know the offense to be his backup?
Maybe so, if you don’t think you’re going anywhere anyway.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
please with the paranoia
if romo goes down this team is screwed, but kitna would be fine. Now your talking well if romo goes down whos backing up kitna when he goes down, then i say well whos backing up that guy you should carry 4 qbs?!!?!?
Really?! Really?!
Interesting "take" on what I said.
Since when is being prepared for contingencies the same as “paranoia”?
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
What's significant?
3 ?
If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.
by GhettoBear04 on Sep 1, 2010 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions
the 3rd qb is the emergency qb he doesnt count against the 45 active
if hes in the other two cant come back into the game. In the strange case both kitna and romo get hurt the team is fucked anyway. Crayton probably would come in as qb then.
You cant expect to have injuries, the what if game is a tired one
Really?! Really?!
McGee's problem is that he checks down too much and too quickly
He needs to start flinging the rock down field if he wants to impress the coaches.
In Romo we Trust
McGee
is not on the bubble. The kid was drafted in 2009. It would make no sense to cut him. Why draft him in the first place if you want to cut him so quickly? I mean Romo is the franchise, so obviously he was a project and not expected to come in and be this great player. He has no real game experience, so what would be the basis for determining he cannot play. What did most fans think of Romo his first 2-3 seasons?
Besides, I think he will show some good things in the finale.
by RisingSunCowboy on Aug 31, 2010 11:18 PM CDT reply actions
His big problem is that he has shown little progress. He doesn’t hold so there is no reason to have him on the active roster and if your not going to have him active why keep him around as a 3rd QB when he isn’t developing.
The guy has a lot of talent but just like at Texas A&M that talent isn’t turning into production.
McGee most certainly IS on the bubble
While it would be nice to give him time to develop, the coaches are measuring his potential against the value of several other guys – from McCann to Leon Washington to Siavii …
For McGee, if he hasn’t shown much potential yet, he’s likely on the wrong side of that bubble.
Original Pet-Cats: Duane Thomas, Roger Staubach, Walt Garrison, Charlie Waters, Bob Lilly
Revolving Doors Around the NFL
Is every player on the Cowboys projected 53 better than all those that will be put on wavers throughout the NFL? Could there a better players available for the 53? (highly probable)
Surely the scouts, coaches, and management are considering all options including trades, or claiming from wavers if there is something that would help. There are players on this team that have positives…yet are expendable.
I don’t see six receivers and Hurd would be the one to go for me. It might be possable to get Young to the PS since he has been injured too.
Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules.
Agree with your predictions BW
I still don’t get the love for Gronk. I can see Dallas has plans for him based on all the playing time, but I just don’t see what he does that has the coaches excited. Do they have him confused with his brother Rob, perhaps? Now that guy is going to be a beast at TE.
I know Hurd deserves a spot because of the type of hard working player he is. Plus he fills many roles on the team, a lot like Crayton. I hope Dallas keeps him, salary concerns aside, he’s worth it.
I just saw on Rotoworld that WAS cut backup C/G Edwin Williams because he doesn’t fit the ZB scheme of Shanahan. He might be worth picking up. I’ll make a fanshot of the news.
Thank you #22, for everything you did for the Cowboys. There will never be another one like you.
Keeping McGee as depth at #3 QB
Does not make any sense. If Romo and Kitna were to go down with injury – please let us not see that happen – would any of you feel confident about McGee stepping in? He may have potential but the 53 spots are needed more urgently in areas other than a development QB this season.
Deon Anderson has never impressed me but the injury to Phillips might have saved his spot.
I think the Cowboys find a way to protect Young. I know he’s a tackle and might not help the team much this season (depending on injuries) but he has long term potential as a starter for this team – which doesn’t have a ton of future potential around the OL right now. An intelligent, quick tackle with size is too valuable to give up on. If it’s a choice between him and McGee or maybe even Anderson…
Let’s just hope the Miami game shows no additional spots needed for a kicker.
to me, the reason to keep mcgee would be if we think he has a chance to be the qb of the future
but since he isn’t even pushing kitna for the #2 spot, one has to wonder if he’s got anything more than his athleticism and size. i thought it was a wasted pick when they took him so high, and i wish he’d do something to change my mind.
Should be a lot to evaluate him on.
The good news is he could show something that makes the team keep him on the 53.
That is also the bad news, because it costs the team someone else.
Man, I understand why the coaches make more than I do.
The new mantra: No more injuries. No more injuries. Everybody now: NO MORE INJURIES!

by 




















