Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Veterans Share Favorite Sports Memories

Dallas' War of the Roses

 

It is purely conjecture.

 

There is nothing factual behind this.

 

It’s just my take.

 

 

Okay, now that the disclaimers are all out there, I can tell you that I’m pretty good at this. Evaluating organizational hierarchies, flushing out inefficiencies and identifying performance roadblocks is what I do. The process isn’t one that’s entirely cerebral, but more often one of intestinal fortitude. You have to have the guts to ask the tough questions, see the things that are ugly and standing in your critical path to success and then, doing whatever you have to do to get it fixed.

 

Now, we all know how it went down. It was one of those faux pas highly characteristic of what people like to call the “old Jerry”. He hired Jason Garrett to “an as yet undetermined position” to get him off of the market when he became available due to Miami’s coaching change. The media had a field day with this, noting that GM Jerry was back to his old tricks, hiring assistants before getting the Head coach in place. Now, of course, people (aka the ones Rich Dalrymple coached) said Wade “okayed the hire” or “blessed it” when he was in the interview process. Maybe so, but would you badmouth a guy your potential boss (who could give you your final shot at leading a team) loved and had such history with? Wade may be soft, but he’s not so dumb as to commit political job suicide before he gets the job. You guys who believe everything that comes out of VR (you know…like how when they say the preseason is meaningless and the offensive woes we saw were all due to the vanilla play calling???) go ahead. I’m not going to call you a doofus, but your parents should get a rebate from your home State on that High School diploma they paid for with their hard-earned tax dollars.

 

Then last night, I saw it again. Wade on one side of the frame, sometimes with Joe DeCamilis in his ear from time to time, watching the offense continue to sputter because of Jason’s unwillingness, or inability, to establish some sort of rhythm and identity. Jason off in some corner looking at photos (presumably not of Cowboys Cheerleaders).

 

I heard Collinsworth say something to the effect that Wade’s defense was doing everything it could to win this game but his offense was in a slump “well, really it’s Jason Garrett’s offense”. Really? Did Chris really say that? Is that what we have become? The functional and philosophical lines of distinction are now so completely apart that the offense of the Cowboys is no longer Wade’s? Can I even use the word “team” in this context anymore without inviting a claim of falsehood?  

 

How many times did Wade actually go over and talk to Garrett during the game? Remember, this is the guy who WORKS FOR Wade. This is the guy who’s running a unit no better than Brian Stewart ran the Dallas defense over a year ago. Come on, it’s been 2 years now. I saw Wade shake his head when they threw those smoke routes and WR screens incessantly…as though they were under strict orders from Obama to get the ball out there to Dez so he could showcase his skills. I saw Joe D talking to Wade when they stopped running the ball, while sprinkling in play action, in favor of trickery.

 

I saw Organizational dysfunction and discord.

 

So I’ll go ahead and call a Wade a Wade here and say that there is something brewing between Jason and Wade. I think there is either no communication or tortured communication between them and it’s gotten to the point where the offensive and defensive game plans don’t have a nexus point. They never blend in terms of strategy and tactics. I think Dallas is a house divided when it comes to this coaching staff and I have to credit Wade (okay, jeer all you want…I can give Winnie kudos when they are due) for standing up there and saying, “it’s my fault” when asked why Choice doesn’t just sit down at the end of the half. There’s a ton of coaches who wouldn’t do that, and we all know it wasn’t Wade’s fault. Respect.

 

But, my impression of this situation is that, if I were asked to come in and flush out the issues that are keeping Dallas from living up to their hype, there is a ‘Great Wall of Jerry’ that sits smack dab in between these two men and it protects Jason from the kind of oversight and (in this case) accountability for doing a better job or finding a different one. The only problem for diehard fans is that there’s no Brian Stewart to fire this time.  

 

Unless something changes, this Season of Jerry will not end well.  

 

 

GO COWBOYS!

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Comment 292 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Couldn't agree more.

Wade said in the press conference that the offense “should have taken a knee” to end the first half.

I think Wade is a fantastic coach. Too bad he hasn’t been handed all of the reigns.

by Admiral Dallas on Sep 13, 2010 12:57 PM CDT reply actions  

It feels good to agree with your assessment..lol

Seriously though, you bring up valid points that are both enlightening and alarming. I haven’t really paid attention to the dynamics of the two but it’s true. As if Joe and Wade are on a completely different page than Garrett’s..

If it continues we won’t do much this season…

"What the hell is going on out there?" - Vince Lombardi.

by Nisri on Sep 13, 2010 1:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Excellent post

I still think the problems this team faces are fixed very easily, but there is likely some truth to the disconnect between Wade and Garrett. There has been evidence of this since they both came to the team. The Dan Reeves fiasco is a good example that these two don’t really mesh. I think they’re both good men, or at least that’s what I can gather. It just seems like they either can’t get on he same page, or their philosophies just don’t work well together. They’ve both achieved some really good things together, but trust may be an issue, and it could be a contributing factor to the lack of focus that seems to plague this team.

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Sep 13, 2010 1:43 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

You never want to believe bad things about people...

but isn’t Jason the “Head Coach in waiting”?

Also, I had not thought about Reeves. I thought that was purely a Jerry vs. Reeves issue?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Wade wanted Reeves to sort of oversee the offense

I think he was sort of a guy who was going to bring the offense around to a philosophy more akin to something Wade wanted. Pretty sure JG wasn’t a fan of that idea. But yeah, Jerry wanted reeves to clock in and out, and Dan wanted no part of that.

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Sep 13, 2010 3:47 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Who clocks in and out?

That’s just stupid.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, not one of Jerry's better moments

That whole mess is still kind of embarrassing.

Maybe Wade inheriting an OC wasn’t such a great idea, but I think they’re both smart enough to make it work.

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Sep 13, 2010 9:50 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not sure this is a cerebral question

…but rather one of poor performance, worsened by distrust and a flawed hierarchy.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess this story caught on across the media

This is officially Big D’s biggest storyline going into next week. It’s something a lot of people, fans and sports writers alike, have picked up on. Seeing as how they both have a more intimate knowledge of what’s going on, surely they see something needs to change. The only question that should remain after this week is whether or not they CAN change. Does JG respect Wade and his position as head coach enough to accept his input? Is Wade capable of cracking the whip on the offense? So on and so on.

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Sep 14, 2010 12:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Where did you see it?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

ESPNDallas had a piece on it

although they reiterated in there that they believe Wade and Garrett when they say the relationship is harmonious.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 14, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

There's the ESPNDallas story

And I’m pretty sure I saw several talking heads on TV mention it. Maybe it wasn’t quite as big of a story as I initially thought it was, though.

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Sep 15, 2010 2:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

i remmeber that,

yesterday i thought he should bring him right now as a consultant just on offense, no matther waht, or any people whom can give advice to garrett regarding the playcalling

by ratware on Sep 14, 2010 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dan Reeves would have been a huge asset

But Jerry wanted a certain amount of hours a week and refused to budge on it. Seemed stupid to me. Sporano was great for JG. He still needs somebody to reign him in. I think he’s a great schemer, but may require a little assistance with play calling. Somebody like Reeves to bounce ideas off of could be just what the doctor ordered. I still have faith that JG is going to be a great OC, and potentially a head coach, it’s just becoming clear that he may be a little in over his head at times.

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Sep 15, 2010 2:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

I can't disagree with your post

on a sort of related note, Wade might be looking askance at some of the offensive playcalling and how it is hurting his defense (and maybe his job security), but maybe Garrett wouldn’t mind a defense that gets more than a turnover every other game. A stretch, I know. But just a thought. Hopefully they can work together in a productive fashion. I guess a 33-16 record could be considered “productive.”

Does anyone else NOT want Garrett to be the Cowboys’ next head coach? Frankly, that notion makes me feel cold and alone and scared.

by DavidH22 on Sep 13, 2010 1:57 PM CDT reply actions  

I think the dynamics of a relationship are pretty hard to gather from the sideline of a game that has been planned for so extensively.

Regardless, I think there is definite truth to the fact that the Cowboys are a more extreme example of the offense and defense falling under completely different domains. This is largely due to the fact, in my opinion, that Wade is fully responsible for the defensive play-calls. My only real contention here would be that I would be willing to bet that there are and have been similar situations that have worked out just fine around the NFL. And furthermore, I would contend that in situations where the head coach is making play-calls for one side of the ball that there will be increased division between the offense and defense. For me, a few obvious examples that stick out are Mariucci and Andy Reid (the most obvious conflict and division though is Ditka and Buddy Ryan). Both are huge offensive guys and when they have had head coach jobs I think they have completely left the defense to their coordinators. For instance, do you think Andy Reid really ever went over to Jim Johnson and challenged his calls? I would say that is doubtful at best.

I suppose my overall point is that I would agree that the Cowboys have a hierarchy that is different than most of the ones you would find around the NFL (it stems a lot in my opinion from the fact that JG was handpicked and Wade exclusively handles the defense). However, I am not so sure unlike you that this is a terrible thing and the dynamics of it are built to blow up. It has worked in other organizations in my opinion and I think Wade doesn’t have enough of an ego to let Jason and the whole head-coach-in-waiting thing bother him.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 13, 2010 2:26 PM CDT reply actions  

The offense and defense are indeed in silos...

and your point about my perspective in my seat on the couch in front of a video screen being a difficult one to assess from is right on. But that’s all the access I get. Know anyone who can get me in the locker room? ;-)

What your examples failed to address was any situation where the domains were so clearly bifurcated in an environment so conducive to distrust.

Andy Reid made Jim Johnson one of his first hires after replacing Ray Rhodes as HC. Mariucci promoted John Marshall to DC in San Francisco.

In both cases, the HC made the call, was accountable for the hire and, as a result, the DC was accountable to the HC.

But Jerry has pulled this crap before and it ended badly.

Clearly, this is the centerpiece, and has been for some time now, of my argument berating Jerry for putting the cart before the horse.

It hasn’t worked. Plain and simple.

At the very least, I can say that with authority and conviction from my seat on the couch.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

superb writing blings...

i feel sorry for wade at times like this.
his D does its job yet again,only to be let down by some strange play-calling by the OC.
lots of penalties by the offense “yet again”.
if as you surmise,there is an “us and them” thing between the offense and defense then the only man that can change this is jerry ..
id hate for this to be true as it will kill our season.
then at seasons end one or both men will lose their jobs..
im still hopeful we will turn it around..GO COWBOYS…………

Davie Wilson
how bout them cowboys!!!

by scotscowboyfan on Sep 13, 2010 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thank you sir

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree to an extent on the JG hiring before Wade.

That is weird to say the least and not normally acceptable.

Sidenote: For the record I actually wanted the Cowboys to hire JG as the head coach rather than just the OC all those years ago. I thought he had great pedigree as an NFL QB a and even e-mailed Mickey (I still thought the mothership was a great source of info at that point) to express my opinion. Of course, Mickey shot me down in the mail bag, but I really loved the idea of the Cowboys going for the young, intelligent coach with some fire in his eyes.

The one thing I would say in response though is that I think what makes Dallas’s situation viable is that Wade (at least from what I have seen) is not a guy who is going to let his ego get in the way of the team running successfully. I just don’t see Wade as a guy who would pout and just have really bad communication or a really bad relationship with JG. And yes, I do agree that our offense and defense are more separated than most teams but I just wouldn’t go so far as to say that it is going to blow up. Wade knew what he was getting into when he took the job and I would like to think that as a professional he would have made sure he liked Garrett as an OC before taking the job.

Maybe I am naive, but I just don’t see a Wade coached team having such dissension in the coaching staff when Wade is by all accounts very hands-on with the defense and is clearly a successful defensive coach.

Sidenote: Everyone around here is obviously familiar with how Switzer apparently had a lot of dissension in his coaching staff and was not very respected in a situation similar in some respect to Wade’s. I think what makes Wade so much different is his hands-on approach in practice and his obvious knowledge of the game. Reading Jeff Pearlman’s book, what really plagued Switzer in a similar situation (with him keeping Jimmy’s staff for the most part) was being so hands-off and clearly not having much to add. That alienated both players and coaches who felt he really was worthless from a football perspective and was just a figurehead.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 13, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree that Wade is not an ego guy

…but alas, that may be his undoing.

His livelihoood hinges on the performance of someone who he didn’t bless and can’t hold accountable.

If you’ve read any of my posts about Wade, you know I have criticized him for NOT having more an edge, not having an ego that limits the amount of tolerance and leeway his players and coaches have.

Last night, you saw one very disciplined, ultra-prepared team that lacked A+ talent beat a team with A+ talent that was undisciplined and ill-prepared.

Jason is Jason, but Wade is also Wade.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah I kind of figured that was where your response would go.

And maybe in some respects its fair. I would love to see a little bit of fire out of Wade (specifically like firing Alex Barron) but like you said in the end he is who he is. And while I wish he had a little more of Mike Tomlin in him (who oddly seems laid back but intense), Wade has done a good job with this defense in my opinion. He has gotten the team to believe in him (at least if you believe Brooking). And ultimately I believe the stupid mistakes reflect on the players at this point (it has survived from the Bill Parcells era). I am still optimistic about this season going forward and I think if Wade wants to be this team’s head coach next year (rather than JG) than he better work to make sure I am right.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 13, 2010 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

You know...

if you can start predicting my rebuttals, this interaction is going to get pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty boring.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Haha I actually try to predict possible replies to all of my posts.

Its not always easy but it makes it easier to respond quicker and easier to make a good argument the first time since predicting replies shows you where your argument is weak.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 13, 2010 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Only Indy and NE have won more games than Dallas the last 3 years

Ergo,

It hasn’t worked. Plain and simple.

I’m really struggling with that logic.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 16, 2010 7:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess your measure of success is what I would question

As I prefaced it, Jerry’s been doing this STUFF with his coaches since Jimmy left town.

What exactly does he, and more importantly the fans, have to show for it?

A bunch of blings?

Consistent improvement as far as post-season performance?

I’d say he’s sheperded the decline of a dynasty because of his lust for gold. It has made it difficult for him to let his ego take a step back and do it the right way.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

To piggyback your point.

All one has to do is compare the fact that the Patsies have remained a contender for a decade even if they haven’t won another trophy since ’04 even with constant moving parts on the roster.

Jerry? It took him three brilliant offseasons to turn back-to-back Super Bowl Champions into 6-10 wretches. Then it took him another eight seasons to put together a team (at least they should be) able to compete for trophies.

Right now this franchise is whatever the hell the Chargers are as far as delivering on expectations goes. I can’t help but think the strange delineation of authority within the coaching structure has something to do with this.

by MadMick on Sep 18, 2010 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well said

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

To expound even further on that.
Jerry? It took him three brilliant offseasons to turn back-to-back Super Bowl Champions into 6-10 wretches. Then it took him another eight seasons to put together a team (at least they should be) able to compete for trophies.

Jerry really has no track record of success on his own. In fact, when he’s been the one making all the football decisions he’s gotten quite a bit of egg on his face.

Jerry hired Jimmy in 1989. Jimmy built the team, and coached until 1993. After he left it took just a few short years for Jerry to run it into the ground. Once he had run it into the ground and thoroughly pissed off the fanbase, he hired Parcells in 2003. Parcells built the team back up and got it back to a respectable level, just before he retired after 2006. It has taken Jerry and his band of yes men and fools just another 3 or so short years to get from the powerhouse this team was in 2007 to where they appear to be headed now.

Jerry needs to hire another real coach, get out of his way, and stay out of his way this time. The man’s ego is baffling. He’s too stubborn, selfish, and just plain stupid to get out of his own way.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Eric Nadel

by TXHC on Sep 21, 2010 1:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

I used to wish JG was head coach

but not anymore. Wade’s D did everything it could and JG called the game like a showcase of his offensive creativity – production be damned.

I know it was only the first game but imagine, just imagine, a Cowboys team that started the season strong, started games strong and stuck with a philosophy through thick and thin. Brains over talent. Maybe someday we’ll see it.

by Billito on Sep 13, 2010 4:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Brains beat talent last night...

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would say bad aim beat us

because our loaded offense kept shooting itself in the foot.

by Billito on Sep 13, 2010 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Are you really loaded on offense if your O-line is suspect?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

A suspect O-line was the buzz of the offseason

but aside from Barron’s boneheaded plays, I thought the O-line held up very well. This team was undone by horrible and inconsistent playcalling, untimely penalties (I know the last one is on the Oline) and the worst play since Leon Lett to end the first half.

The Oline was playing well enough to win.

by Billito on Sep 14, 2010 8:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree

The RT did in this game what the RT did in Mineesota. Nothing good.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1

Even if it didn’t show up in sacks, it did show up in our playcalling – Garett was conservative, and in the situations where he tried to open things up (end of the halves), Barron’s limitations showed through

by foyesboys on Sep 16, 2010 2:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

they always start strong

romo is 9-2 in Sept

Really?! Really?!

by thebigham on Sep 14, 2010 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

9-3 now

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why would Obama give orders to get Dez the ball?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 13, 2010 5:57 PM CDT reply actions  

There are a lot of things Obama does that I don't understand

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great post.

I agree pretty whole heartedly.

And I thought this was the worst game I’ve seen from Garrett from a playcall stanpoint since… the first Washington game of 2008.

The back to back Dez Bryant quick passes were just… mind boggling. Dallas played crappy last night but probably should have won even despite that.

AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.

Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.

by Iron Fist on Sep 13, 2010 6:14 PM CDT reply actions  

Thanks dude

I’ll be over this by Wednesday and onto my thoughts about the Bears.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah I know how you feel.

I was just telling my wife how I hate how it takes a week to get this sour taste out of my mouth.

Can someone please explain to me why Dallas didn’t try to gash the fng middle of the Washington defense with the run more? It seemed like they had 3+ yards every run there. Uggg just uggggg.

AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.

Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.

by Iron Fist on Sep 13, 2010 7:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

More like 4+ at one point

…and what is more interesting is that the teams JG played on were very simplistic in their play calling. They did whatever worked until you found a way to stop it.

What screwball theories did he pick up working in Miami?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't even mention the crazy Marion Barber halfback pass either.

Right after that play I said out loud, “I’d like to never see the play again.”

Why do that? “Hey I have an idea, lets just throw a play away?”

AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.

Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.

by Iron Fist on Sep 14, 2010 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

I had the same reaction

If you’re a 5 win team playing a playoff team than I’m all for the tricks. But when you’re moving the ball like Dallas was at that time and you have the weapons, what is the point of trying that??

It’s something that Miami did all the time last year. They’d be in the midst of running the ball down the other team’s throats, then they’d bring in Pat White and blow the whole drive.

At least Marion had the sense to throw it away… Sigh

by WAREwolf94 on Sep 14, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have always liked that play personally

but we hadn’t run enough at that point to make it work. San Diego used to run that play to perfection with LT as the safeties would bite every time. It certainly didn’t work, but I really didn’t hate the call.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 14, 2010 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

I hated it because it wasn't needed.

Dallas was moving the ball, they didn’t need that play at that point in the game.

AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.

Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.

by Iron Fist on Sep 15, 2010 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

A fair point for sure

but it just wasn’t one of those plays that when he called it that I hated right away (probably because it was early in the game and I still thought we would score). In hindsight it could have been used at a better time for sure, but ultimately I appreciated the creativity and the homage to those LT plays at the time it happened.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 15, 2010 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

2nd and 1 at the opposing 30-yard line

Up 24-10 with 1:32 left in the half.

Okay, go crazy.

But at that time, with that down and distance? No. Just…no.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Correct

That kind of trickery has a place. This was not it.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

this particular game is a nasty one

Especially cause its week 1 and we have no idea where the team will go. I found it much easier to accept the playoff loss than this. I guess you could compare this to the Broncos game last year, even to the point of the wild last couple minutes.

by foyesboys on Sep 14, 2010 2:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Here's why I am not totally bent out of shape...

We saw Tony Romo pull a Skynet last year. He became self-aware after that NYG game when he essentially lost that game by himself.

Since then, it’s been nothing but good from him.

At some point, maybe Garrett has the same kind of epiphany and realizes the folly of his ways.

I do, however, have to balance that hipeful feeling out with the fact that Dallas just has a crappy history in the post-Jimmy era of believeing their own press clippings. We haven’t handled success well in the last 15 years.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

did i read this correctly?
we haven"t handled success well in the las 15 years.
we haven"t had any success the last 15 years!!.
by which i mean more “blings”.

Davie Wilson
"how bout them cowboys"!!!

by scotscowboyfan on Sep 14, 2010 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

No we haven't

there is no doubt about that. I think (or maybe hope?) this team is different though – they seem much more aware of how they are playing.

by foyesboys on Sep 16, 2010 2:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

i think so too,

just wish we did’nt give away so many penalties.

Davie Wilson
"how bout them cowboys"!!!

by scotscowboyfan on Sep 16, 2010 6:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

It sort of makes you wonder...

Is Garrett even the coach-in-waiting anymore? Wade got his contract extended, and it’s well documented in the media how pitiful Garrett can be at times. If, for some reason, Wade should lose his job in the near future (please, on so many levels, no… there’s nobody else who can run the defense like he does), I highly doubt Garrett gets the nod as head coach.

And if he does, God help us all…

by Admiral Dallas on Sep 13, 2010 8:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Garrett has his moments

But yeah, there are times it seems he lets play calling get away from him. He has moments that make you think “wow, great call” and then proceeds to do something completely frustrating. He’s aggressive, and I like that, but he can let things get away from him, like not continuing to run the ball…or calling a smoke screen or whatever you call it to Dez for no gain and proceeding to run almost the exact same thing the very next play for almost the exact same result.

The thing that I wonder is just how close are Tony Romo and Jason Garrett? It seems like they’re both very comfortable with each other. Is getting rid of Jason Garrett something that could upset Romo, hurt his development, or something to that effect? It’s pretty clear Romo is this franchise. It’s something to consider when looking for Wade’s successor, whenever his time here is up. There are a plethora of outstanding offensive and defensive coordinators in the NFL that would love to work with the weapons we have on both sides of the ball.

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Sep 14, 2010 2:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think he'd make a terrific coach

so long as Jerry gives the full authority given to Jimmy Johnson and Bill Parcells.

There is indeed a fundamental organizational structural problem: there is no locus of authority and no clearly delineated hierarchy, so that Jerry can be the focal point.

by rabblerousr on Sep 13, 2010 10:35 PM CDT reply actions  

And therein lies the problem that has become a dreadful super bowl drought in Dallas

People want JG and Wade (and the players) to tone down their egos for the good of the team, but the man at the top isn’t a role model for that type of behavior.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2010 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think Wade and Garett are at odds like you do..

but at the same time, its seeming more and more evident to me that Wade is getting pissed off because he is on the hot seat while his defense is playing A ball and Garett’s offense is completely unreliable. I don’t know whether that means he wishes he had more control over the O, or just that he wants to keep his job.

by foyesboys on Sep 14, 2010 2:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

The offense is pretty reliable

I think they can rely on them to gain yards and not score points.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

..and why aren't you a front page writer?

FEAR the STAR...it's all or nothing.... time to COWBOY UP.

by .FRoST.USAF on Sep 14, 2010 12:51 AM CDT reply actions  

That's a helluva compliment

…but I like having the freedom to express what I call my “Writer’s Tourette’s Syndrome” in ways like this when I need to.

Plus, BTB has a bevvy of great writers whose articles are top-notch.

Thanks again.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

And we like to have the option

of reading 5Blings compose articles like this.

Also, these types of long, drawn out discussions don’t happen on the front page anymore, as the articles fall off into the archival abyss after a day or two. Well written (and recommended) fanposts have a much longer shelf life than the front page stuff.

by One.Cool.Customer on Sep 15, 2010 5:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just can't let that one go, can you?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like how you say that the Saints had peaked in that article.

Regardless, everyone gets something wrong at some point and it was good to see you mostly, kind of own up to it (which is more than many on here).

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 15, 2010 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL @ "mostly, kind of"

:-)

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

I thought you would appreciate that haha.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 16, 2010 2:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ah ha! I wasn't dreaming this..

At times I thought I was the only one who felt this. Wade is hung out to dry in front of the media for the teams’ performance (or lack thereof). Do you ever see, much less hear, anything out of Garrett? I don’t, and I don’t know if its that he’s a bad interview or whatever. I never see Wade and Garrett conversing and that doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen, it’s just you never see it in a game.
Normally I think your just a contrarian, Blings, but this time I think you nailed it on the head. It’s the strange surreal house that Jerry built.

I started out with nothing and still have most of it left

by Benthere on Sep 14, 2010 2:29 AM CDT reply actions  

Nah, I'm probably just a contrarian

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why would we panic when the playoffs come around and the Cowboys are in it at 10-6?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

What a phenomenal post...

Aside from the authority issues, I wonder about this: has Garrett’s offense been “solved” by opposing DC’s? After Romo’s accurate comments about their scheme being “exposed” in ’08, I gather that they spent last offseason solving their problems with the blitz. And they did, in fact solve the Eagles blitz last year.

But looking back, I wonder if that was more a function of the Eagles’ secondary inability to tackle. It seems that every above average D blitzes us with impunity, knowing that our countermeasure will be a quick unload by Romo that goes for 6 yards. It’s very, very rare that we take the risk that our line can block the blitz and throw downfield. This deficiency is heightened once we cross the 35 yard line, as teams defend an even shorter field and therefore face an even lower downside for blitzing. At some point, it seems we’re going to have to trust the line to hold or Romo to escape. Otherwise, our offense (especially in the scoring zone) is a bunch of 6 yard passes mixed with tipped balls/sacks. The math in that tradeoff does not work in our favor.

by TimSchultz36 on Sep 14, 2010 11:06 AM CDT reply actions  

Thanks

You make a point that I’ve been making for some time now and I’d like OCC or someone to look at
this more closely.

I don’t believe Romo has been able to throw the ball deep (to be clear, I mean in the air over 20 yards) nearly as much as he did in 2007.

I’m not sure if that is a function of lacking the deep threat or the play calling or the inability to block long enough for that kind of route to develop.

I saw us do it in the New Orleans game last year and that really threw their DC off. Other than that, not so much.

This aerial attack has become one-dimensional and tries to dink and dunk its way down the field.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

5B - usually your posts make me look at issues from perspectives I hadn't considered

And there’s always a semi-controversial ‘hook’ that generates interest and pushes Comment volume. But methinks this is a theory in search of a conspiracy.

We all recognize Wade operates at a hierarchical disadvantage – with responsibility for results, but incomplete authority over the process. As noted by many of us, his personality also contributes to the dysfunction.

Look no further than the D Reeves issue cited above and contrast that with the B Stewart sacrificial lamb program form a couple of seasons ago. Who is responsible – JJ, who’s Season Of we are now experiencing in all its rich tapestry already. The real question is why? What is the motivation towards essentially turning the Org Chart upside Down in this case?

So Riddle me this – name the only person in the entire football side of the organization who played on the glory teams of the 90’s? Why Jason Garrett, of course. He’s JJ’s last direct player link to his championships. And it’s really not his fault that Jerry thinks there’s some of that old magic lightning left in that particular bottle.

The true Conspiricy Theorist would postulate JG is holding back the O to the point where even the D cannot overcome its lack of productivity. Which in turn, places the titular HC in a precarious position and positions the succession plan appropriately. Alternatively, WP’s Faux, ‘Blame Me,’ postgame comments are really designed to bring attention to JG’s unconventional autonomy, hoping the light of day will demonstrate this to be doomed and restore the correct balance. Which brings me to Riddle #2 – after what we saw SUN, is anyone in this organization capable of that type of forward thinking? Methinks not..

PS – speaking of the glory years – anybody see the newly slimmed down Nate Newton on the Fox Sports West recap show? Amazing transformation.

Character is easier kept than recovered

by tdships on Sep 14, 2010 12:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Hehehe...
The true Conspiricy Theorist would postulate JG is holding back the O to the point where even the D cannot overcome its lack of productivity.

Yeah…I’m not ready to go that far…yet.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jason Garrett is not an NFL caliber coach

Simple as that. Jason was handed the offense a few years ago and came out with a dominating system, one year later, the INTELLIGENT minds in the NFL figured it out. Who in their right mind runs 2 WR screens in a row on 1st and 2nd down? That was just some of the horrible play calling we saw on Sunday night.

Wade Phillips is a good coach, but I worry about his lack of control with this team. Great points were made in this post, and it proved that this is certainly a team divided. Jerry and his minions need to open their eyes and realize that there is a problem with this offense, and it’s not the personnel, it’s the man calling the plays.

Tony Romo is one of the best QB’s in this league, but he is handcuffed by a college caliber, at best, O-Coordinator. We are one of the most unbalanced offenses in the league, we rushed the ball a total of 22 times on Sunday night while averaging close to 5 ypc, while throwing the ball 48 times, averaging 6 yard per pass, something there just doesn’t make sense. We have a “Three Headed Monster” in our backfield and we used them 22 times?? That is not going to help win games, but JG has done it since he’s been here, abandons the run because he thinks he HAS to pass the ball 50 times per game to win.

Anyway, the season has begun, and we’re stuck with our staff the way it is, but something better change soon, if not, this will be a very very long season.

by KJDH2154 on Sep 14, 2010 12:22 PM CDT reply actions  

I thinks 2 plays as an indictment for an entire body of work

is what qualifies as statistically insignificant. Even if they were the worst plays ever called in the history of the sport. It’s fairly common knowledge 2 plays are called in the huddle – 1 for the anticipated match-ups and the other, a ‘check with me’ alternative. We don’t even know if JG called these or Romo checked to them or audibles out of both to the WR Screens. They didn’t work, we know that though our crystal clear 20-20 hindsight, so can we now move on?

From my own, highly unsophisticated, completely without stats research I’ll assume that 10-15% of ALL offensive plays called fail. So let’s place them in that category. I’m much more concerned about the end-of the half call that failed strategically, tactically and was execution-ally flawed. Even at that it needed the combined failure of 4 distinct entities – OC, HC, QB, RB to reach the nadir of suckdom it achieved.

O-Line personnel dictated the game-plan and play-calling. DAL essentially could not run Right, to AB’s side and had to throw quickly. Of their 21 carries – 9 went for 3 yards or less(43%) which is substantial. That’s the problem with averages – they mask the impact of the below average input. Add to that, we finished the game, from 1:50 on, with 12 consecutive passes. Until then the R/P ratio was within 5% of last season’s.

5B – forgot to give props for the SkyNet reference. Self-aware FTW!

Character is easier kept than recovered

by tdships on Sep 14, 2010 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

The two plays was an example....if you READ my comment, you'll see that

I thought the entire night Garrett’s play calling was bad, I was yelling at my TV directly at him. I don’t think he uses our weapons like he should. You touched on 9 of the 21 runs going for 3 yards or less, but that does not mean you completely abandon the run. A consistent run game is so crucial in this league because it sets up so many things for the offense, like play action, which Garrett loves so much, but doesn’t realize that you have to run the ball for it to work. I just want balance in this offense, you have 3 backs who could all be feature backs on multiple teams in this league, and you run it 22 times??? Inexcusable

by KJDH2154 on Sep 14, 2010 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll try, but it's so time-consuming

After a couple of years here, you’d think I would know that by now. Even with that limited knowledge, I still believe the 12 passes in a row at game-end skewed the average. Let’s see if the (hopeful) return of our starting LG and RT changes the mix more back to the norm. Then I can continue my casual-reading habits that have served me so well.

One aspect of the O play that MUST be cleaned up is getting to the line with more than 10 seconds on the play clock. It wastes TO’s, gets delay penalties and limits options when we’re not yet set and there’s less than 5 secs remaining. There was also more than 1 occasion when WR’s notably RW and Dez, didn’t appear know the play call at the line. Some of this was in the last minute, but still, we’re supposed to have planned for that. Collinsworth was beside himself on the last play that someone still didn’t know their route. Coming out of a TO, that’s inexcusable.

Character is easier kept than recovered

by tdships on Sep 14, 2010 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Couldn't agree more

I think this also fall on JG. How does your team break from a 30 second timeout and not know what the hell is going on??? I know it seems like I’m basically blaming JG for everything that went wrong, but I honestly think he is a huge reason why we lost on Sunday night.

But as an optimist, I believe that the offensive game plan going into Sunday night was based around Alex Barron, the quick throws and constant motion calls was a sign that they didn’t trust Barron one bit. Colombo coming back will allow us to do a lot more on Sunday.

by KJDH2154 on Sep 14, 2010 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well if they believe that we don't need a run game, like you apparently do

Then why the hell aren’t we trading 2 of our 3 RB’s for picks??? Seems like it’s pointless to keep them around if we are just going to waste their talent.

P.S. – The Dallas Cowboys are NOT, I repeat are NOT the New Orleans Saints
Sean Peyton is much much much much much much smarter than Jason Garrett
And don’t give me this “well look who won last years head to head match up” cause If you believe that the Cowboys were better than the Saints last year, you are greatly mistaken.

by KJDH2154 on Sep 14, 2010 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sean Payton is not that much smarter than Jason Garrett.

I think he has perfected his system in New Orleans, but whose to say that Garrett couldn’t do the same if he was given such creative control in Dallas? Furthermore, Payton sure looks awfully good when he has Drew Brees throwing the pigskin around (just like how Romo makes Garrett look good at times). I think Payton is the better coordinator, but your comment is the definition of hyperbole.

Now, as far as your take on the run game, let me ask you this: When you can gain an average of 5.4 yards per play with Garrett’s sense of balance, what is the true purpose of running the ball more (make sure to take into account that running more means longer drives and more chances for drive-killing penalties)?

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 14, 2010 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Reason I believe we should run more

Is because of the RB’s we have. This team should be a run first team, JG is too pass happy. Dallas had more drive killing penalties on pass play than they did run plays on Sunday night, which is why I don’t understand that argument. Also longer drives means that you can control the clock. I believe that this offense would be much better if they were more balanced, but I feel like I’m beating a dead horse here because we know it won’t change, for the past 3 years it’s been the same thing, 70% pass 30% run, I disagree with the strategy, but that’s just me. I guess I’m partially right, we did have 380 total yds on Sunday night and only 7 points, so there must be something wrong with the offensive play calls.

by KJDH2154 on Sep 14, 2010 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

The key though is that we did indeed have 380 yards.

Could we really have moved the ball that much more if we had run it more? Do you really believe that considering that our YPA for passing was higher than our YPC (and keep in mind the YPC hadn’t reached the point of diminishing returns yet)?

You raise an interesting point on the pass penalties, but I think we could agree that it would be hard to say on exactly what plays (running or passing) penalties would take place if we increased our drive length (judged by the # of plays). However it would still be fair to say that more plays (which the running game would create) would in almost all cases mean more penalties. This is a point that had been especially harped on by Raf who always pointed out how JG needed to go for shorter drives (think more passes) to keep our offense from shooting itself in the foot. So yes, penalties took place on pass plays in the game, but if we increased the drive length by running more, it would still be most fair to say that that would lead to more penalties (irrespective of the type of play it came on).

And lastly, I don’t think you are right about the play-calling simply because we only got seven points out of 380 yards. I think most would agree here that that fact is much more representative of things like penalties, mental errors by players, and missed field goals than anything Garrett did. Put another way, I fail to see how running more would have guaranteed more points. That is conjecture to the greatest degree and is in my opinion blatantly false since it wasn’t as if we were busting them up for 20 yard runs every time we ran (and plus, as someone touched on, 9 out of 21 runs went for three yards or less).

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 14, 2010 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's some of both

Argument for Pass – You have to pass effectively in the modern NFL to win. The Jets were an exception to that last year, but essentially backed into the playoffs. In this league you do pass to set up the run.

Argument for Run – no one wins the NFC East without an effective Run game. This becomes even more critical later in the season in cold-weather venues. No better friend to the QB than a good run game.

Dallas Run/Pass ratio over the last 3 years – 43%, 41%, 43%. You want to talk to a fan base who is driven crazy nuts over Run Pass ratio – Andy Reid makes JG look like Vince Lomabrdi. And they don’t call him a college coach. Don’t care to do the analysis myself, but I bet we’re in the middle of the pack for the league

Character is easier kept than recovered

by tdships on Sep 14, 2010 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree that you have to have both to win.

The great thing on Sunday was though that we did have both. Both our passing game and running games were effective and we moved the ball well. That is ultimately why I don’t get this vitriol aimed at Garrett.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 14, 2010 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

it is the failure to get the ball into the end zone that frustrates me

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 14, 2010 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah I suppose I should clarify.

I don’t get the vitriol over the run-pass balance. I do understand the hand-wringing a little bit over the redzone problems, but even with that I liked the play calls in the redzone (yes I liked the Barber pass call except for the fact that he should have run it on second down when he usually runs the ball).

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 14, 2010 7:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wondered who was going to catch that first...

You win!

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

ive always said.....

jerry was and still is.. the biggest team prob we have, he needs to give gm to his son and do like bum bright and hit the not seen button…..

woman !, dont try to understand em, dont try to make them understand you, for they are a breed apart ! lol

by demonbane on Sep 14, 2010 12:53 PM CDT reply actions  

nonsense

JJ took over NFL’s last place team. Look at what has been built.

Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules.

by 1Bullseye on Sep 15, 2010 12:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

child!

woman !, dont try to understand em, dont try to make them understand you, for they are a breed apart ! lol

by demonbane on Sep 16, 2010 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

wish they showed more texans games up here,,

woman !, dont try to understand em, dont try to make them understand you, for they are a breed apart ! lol

by demonbane on Sep 14, 2010 1:01 PM CDT reply actions  

even more nonsense

Get NFL ticket and buy texans pom poms. This is not the Houston blog.

Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules.

by 1Bullseye on Sep 15, 2010 1:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

They still sell pom poms?

I thought it was just that Pom drink I get at the market?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

child grow up im a cowboy fan since 1957 ,but i also like to keep up with the other texas team ,,, grow up child !

woman !, dont try to understand em, dont try to make them understand you, for they are a breed apart ! lol

by demonbane on Sep 16, 2010 7:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

1967 lol....this for you bulseye

woman !, dont try to understand em, dont try to make them understand you, for they are a breed apart ! lol

by demonbane on Sep 16, 2010 7:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

"Unless something changes"

What the hell is going to change Bling?? You actually think Jerry is going to fire either guy in mid season…it will never, ever happen.

Sunday’s loss was the result of stupid mistakes by both the players and Garrett for not having Romo take a knee to end the first half. Nothing more, nothing less.

To say the HC and one of his coordinators have to get along and be buddy buddy for the team to win is ridiculous….obviously you weren’t around when the ’85 Bears dominated the league that year with the HC (Ditka) and DC (Ryan) hating each other.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 14, 2010 1:46 PM CDT reply actions  

Garrett for not having Romo take a knee to end the first half.

Was it the wrong play call?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 14, 2010 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

no, it was calling any play that was wrong

you simply don’t run any play, just take a knee..

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 14, 2010 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

so any thing other than "victory formation" and taking the knee was the wrong play call, right?

RIGHT?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 14, 2010 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you got him.

Unfortunately, when you catch a Terry, the trap is empty as he won’t reply back.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 14, 2010 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh don't play like that doesn't happen.

I don’t really blame you, but you definitely do that sometimes.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 14, 2010 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

The victory formation though is a play within itself.

It has a designation, a place in practice, and in Madden I have to go to the special teams playbook to select it. The coaches called the wrong play in that situation; I don’t understand why that thought is so detestable to you.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 14, 2010 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

victory formation really isn't a play

To me, an offensive play is designed to move the ball down field to gain yards or a TD. The kneel down is done at the end of either half when either the outcome of the game is decided or in this case, a team should realize time has run out to score before the half.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think Herman Edwards would disagree with your characterization of the victory formation

because that resulted in a very real defensive TD, which as far as I can tell can only take place on an offensive play.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 15, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

not true

Edwards TD resulted in the GMen failing to kneel down in the last seconds of that game. They attempted a hand off and botched it just we botched it.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

You are right, my mistake.

Regardless, if the scenario happened in which the center botched the snap to the QB as the QB tried to take a knee and the defense ended up recovering the ball (or even worse running it back) the victory formation would be very much considered a play (since it would count as a turnover or even points) and certainly a dumb one at that. And seeing as a coordinator has no guarantees of what is going to happen on any given play (unless he is a psychic at which point they probably wouldn’t be in the situation to take a simple knee to win the game), that call has to be considered a play beforehand since the outcome can very much be a play for the defense or even the offense if the snap is fumbled and the RB picks it up and runs with it.

/sees Seanrude has made a nearly identical argument, hits post anways

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 15, 2010 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great minds think alike

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 15, 2010 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

bad argument

If the qb fumbles in that situation no defender is going to run with it, the qb or Olinemen simply fall on the ball.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 16, 2010 7:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

so you are saying that is impossible, to a moral and metaphysical certainty, for the football, which is an odd shape, to take a funny bounce and get away from the QB (and now the lineman)?

Work with my hypothetical. I know it it is bat$h!t fracking insane to even dream of such an occurence, but let’s say a defender scoops the ball up, and runs with it, and crosses the goal line. Is that a touchdown? Or does it not count because that ‘play which is as of yet unnamed but is most certainly under no circumstances never ever ever a play’ play not really a play?

And what do we call it if it is not a play? That question is still pending, Counselor, after all of this time.

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 16, 2010 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

never said it wasn't defined technically as a play

I’m saying calling for a knell down is more strategy than play calling. Like deciding to kick or FG or punt on 4th down.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 16, 2010 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

so was the wrong play called, in the strictly technical sense of course?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 16, 2010 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also, does the td in my hypothetical (my absolutely crazy insane hypothetical of a botched snap that neither th qb nor the lineman fall on)

does it count?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 16, 2010 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

A yalp?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 16, 2010 6:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Worse argument.

There have certainly been instances of a botched snap leading to a fumble recovery for the other team. And yes, it is extremely unlikely, but the existence of any chance at all for the other team to get the ball simply proves the fact that the victory formation is a play.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 16, 2010 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

except for the "victory formation" and taking a knee, WHICH IS A FRACKING PLAY!!!!!!!!

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 14, 2010 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

an offensive play is designed to move the ball downfield or score

taking a knee doesn’t do either, therefore, not really a play.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think it gets recorded as a play in the statistics...mainly because the ball is snapped and put in play

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

so if the snap is fumbled, and the defense picks it up and runs it in for a TD, that TD does not count because it was not a "play", right?

In any event, You have already admitted that Red and Wade screwed the pooch in this instance because they called a play which was a mistake which according to you no coach has ever done except for that one time with Ray Perkins and maybe another time that you do not recall and besides Dez is an arrogant punk.

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 15, 2010 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

point is it didn't matter which play is called

Calling any play at that point was a mistake, the kneel down should have happened.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

so the play that was called was a mistake. Do I have that right?

and as for my hypothetical above, that td would not count because it was not a real play, right?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 15, 2010 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

calling any play in the playbook was a mistake

and if the snap is fumbled on a kneel down the qb simply falls on the ball.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

So what does the coach say?

“Hey, you guys go out there and figure out how to run the clock down. But hey!!! Don’t run any sort of play. No snapping the ball! And absolutely, positively no putting your knee anywhere near the turf!!!”

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

of course it's technically a play

but it’s not a play in the sense you were refering to

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 16, 2010 7:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

So coaches can technically call the wrong play?

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 16, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well that is a creative rephrasing.

You said, “it’s technically a play.” So therefore, Garrett incorrectly called for something that you classified as “technically a play.” That looks an awful lot like the coach called the wrong or incorrect play.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 16, 2010 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

not, it's incorrect strategy

Like I said, it’s the same as calling for a punt or FG on 4th down, it’s not the play itself that was wrong but the decision to actually run it instead of taking a knee.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 16, 2010 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just so I am clear, and please correct me if I am misunderstanding you

Coaches have never ever, not once, not a single time, called a wrong ‘play’ in an NFL game (except for that one time that Ray Perkins did and one other time maybe).

But strategy? Coaches f%^& that up all the time.

Is that right?

How often do they let you out? Just day trips, or do you get some overnighters as well?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 16, 2010 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

you are misunderstanding me

I don’t know what really constitutes a “wrong” play, but I do know when I witness “wrong” strategy during a game.

To me, the OC calls the plays to move the offense down the field, the HC determines the strategy, like going for it on 4th down or kicking a FG or punting….or taking a knee.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 17, 2010 8:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I so wish i Could Rec this more than once

"Of all the things I have lost , I miss my mind the most-Random T-shirt

"There is a fine line between Genius and Insanity"-Unknown Author

by I draft the Cowboys!!!! on Sep 16, 2010 10:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

In what ssense am I referring to it that differentiates from a real play, in the strictly technical sense of course?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 16, 2010 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

taking a knee is strategy

just like deciding to kick a FG, punt or go for it. It doesn’t really qualify as “playcalling” as was defined by the earlier thread this summer.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 17, 2010 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

It would count, unless Alex Barron is playing, in which case all bets are off

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

If putting eleven guys on the field, snapping the ball, and the qb handling the snap before taking a knee is not a 'play' what exactly would you call it? What football term does it fall under?

If the left guard (for example only, not intended to be an exhaustive list) flinches before the snap of the ball on the ‘as yet unnamed but definitely not a play’ play, would the refs be allowed to call him for a false start? Count off the five yeard and everything, or does not that happen in this strange netherworld we have entered where plays are ‘plays’ and don’t really count?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 15, 2010 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

In certain parallel universes, like on Earth Prime...

that might not be called a play.

But then, who knows?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Bizzaro Garret was definitly on the sideline.

AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.

Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.

by Iron Fist on Sep 15, 2010 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

you really think they have the kneel down in the playbook??

you actually think the team practices this in practice??

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Of course they do...

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

You actually think they don't?

They practice it so that the guys know where to line up in order to prevent my nightmare scenario should the QB fumble the exchange.

If it is not ‘play’ what exactly do you call it? That question is still pending, Counselor.

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 15, 2010 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like I said before, it's technically a play

but not in the sense that you were refering back to our argument this summer.

Calling a knell down is game strategy, Wade said so himself. Play calling by the OC, deciding which plays to call is 100% a different animal.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 16, 2010 7:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

so when Garret did not call for the 'kneel down' which is not a play in the hyper techincal sense but is still unnamed, he made a mistake, right?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 16, 2010 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's CRAZY!!!

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 16, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

of course he did, I said that from the very beginning

but has nothing to do with play calling, it has to do with strategy.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 16, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Isn't play calling part of strategy?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 16, 2010 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Unless you're Garrett

…in which case it is Russian Roulette!!!

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 16, 2010 6:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

strategy is part of game management

which is the domain of the HC, not the OC who does have the responsibility to call the plays.

Therefore even though both guys took the blame. the ultimate responsibility falls on Phillips.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 17, 2010 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Amazing humor

Nothing like it before or since, compares.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree, I am very funny

oh wait, you meant Python, didn’t you?

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 18, 2010 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Of course not

I meant you.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting comparison, terry

…but I would discount the relevance for a few reasons;

First, the owner wasn’t a big part of the problem. Second, the HC wasn’t enamored with the DC, but the DC’s unit was carrying the team (and became the face of the organization). Third, the team was wildly successful and as we all know, winning can obfuscate a bunch of ugly relationship issues (see: Switzer – Aikman; Super Bowl Champions). Finally, the HC was just that, the HC….not a coordinator too.

This coordinator hasn’t been getting the job done since 2007 and the HC/DC has built a staunch defense. I think the HC looks at the OC and sees poor performance but can’t do anything about it. That wasn’t anywhere near the case in Chicago with Ditka and Ryan.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree on a few things

Ditka was always the face of the Bear’s organization, not Ryan. That’s not even debatable.

The fact that the Bears were successful just proves your theory wrong in that teams can win without a great relationship among coaching staff.

Garrett has been getting the job done, if you look at our offensive stats since 2007, they are among the best in the league in that time period. Garrett might have his flaws, but he is among the best OCs in the game today, stats and the teams success prove that. As a matter of fact, considering he has been working with an average OL at best during that time period and even worse one now, I think he’s done an amazing job.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Slow your roll, soldier...

I said the defense became the face of the organization, not Ditka or Ryan.

The theory is a bit less simplistic than you seem to grasp. This is a case where the dynamics are absolutely nothing like what they were in Chicago (I think I outlined why above) and even if you were to sweep aside the huge differences in these scenarios, you’d still have to provide more than one instance of an event taking place to be able to say it’s something more than an aberration of sorts.

I doubt you’d be able to do that in any way that would be considered compelling (nothing new there).

On your stats, you’d better look more closely.

If you take out the T.O.-centric 2007, you would see that 2008 and 2009 have been pretty MEE-DEE-OH-KURR (that’s for you, OCC) offensively, especially as it pertains to points scored.

You’re entitled to your opinion about Garrett, but given what you’ve said here, it doesn’t seem to be based on anything other than the fact that he works for the Cowboys.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

why take out 2007?? That year should count as any other

2008 took a hit because of Romo and Jones getting hurt and Garrett not having all his weapons.

My opinion of Garrett is based on the offensive success this team has had during his tenure as OC. Compare that to the Cowboys teams prior and you’ll a huge drop off.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Because 2007 was his first year as OC and he had T.O. and Sparano

…but even if you count it, you’d have to say the offensive point production has declined since then, wouldn’t you?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

what the hell was so special about T.O.?

Austin is duplicating his numbers easily.

Our point production has dropped, but I’d attribute that to a lack of execution, not Garrett’s playcalling.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Deep balls...

They don’t happen without T.O.

Remember the 6-pack you owe me that you never sent me?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

One sign of encouragement to me...

Is that Dallas actually did ATTEMPT some deep passes Sunday night. To me it isn’t so much of hitting those bombs as just letting the defense know that you are going to attempt them.

AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.

Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.

by Iron Fist on Sep 15, 2010 7:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

Question: when was the last time we connected on one of those?

Was it the Saints game last year?

Oh, and McGee’s superbly thrown ball to Hurd in preseason doesn’t count. :-)

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

haha

Yeah I think Dallas will connect one them in the future, to Washington’s credit they have a pretty sick stable of CB’s.

I read a statistic last year that said that Dallas only attempted 9 passes over 40 yards last year, which is crazy.

AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.

Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.

by Iron Fist on Sep 15, 2010 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Doesn't surprise me at all

When people say Miles Austin has done the same things T.O. did, I have to chuckle.

I’m so glad he’s gone, but the guy had the best hip and shoulder fakes in the business. It allowed him to set up his opponents in ways Austin and williams just can’t.

I’m hopeful that as Dez gets his explosion back and learns the game, he will display that kind of ability.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Austin can so some of that same stuff.

He has some pretty nice double moves and is super explosive out of his cuts.

It seems to me like Dallas has gotten gun shy since Romo got hurt in the AZ game. I’d love to see the stat for the amount of deep throws after that game.

AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.

Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.

by Iron Fist on Sep 15, 2010 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Flashing the bat-signal for OCC

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 16, 2010 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here I am

Romo Passes Thrown by distance and year:
……………..06…07…08…09
31-40 yds…8….14….20…15
40+ yds…..10….0……8…..0
Compl……..6…..7…..11….3

by One.Cool.Customer on Sep 16, 2010 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kaboom!!!

Thanks OCC.

Are these a measure of how far the ball traveled when they are incomplete?

Also, is the number complete a measure of completions versus both the 31-40 and the 40+ or just the 40+?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 16, 2010 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Correct and correct

Think of these numbers as “air yards”. The completions are for both distances combined, you can look up the details on ESPN’s Romo page.

by One.Cool.Customer on Sep 17, 2010 3:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

How does he stack up with other QB's?

Quick!

Before we run out of web page margin!!

:-)

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

And yes

I think it was the Saints game.

AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.

Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.

by Iron Fist on Sep 15, 2010 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

So if the opposing DC's know that...

why would you ever stop blitzing Romo and stacking the box against the run?

They almost have to force some of those plays to keep bad guys honest.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Romo throws the deep ball to Austin

and I owe you nothing, I won the bet, not you.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 16, 2010 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Are you talking about the deep 8 -yard drag?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 16, 2010 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also the Falcons game had the long throw to Austin.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 16, 2010 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think we threw a couple in the Seahawk game...

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 16, 2010 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dallas' scoring stats are middle of the pack, and that stat is sort of important in Non-Fantasy Football Games

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Larry Allen + Rayfield Wright = Roy Williams
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 15, 2010 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

But Romo likes him!!!!

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Garrett Sucks

Only he can take a team with such talent, and twist it to play a type of offense that will “dumb down” to every defense, and keep our opponents in the game.

For those of you that think run-pass ratio is the issue with Garrett, and him not calling run plays, it isn’t. The real issue is deflating a teams chemistry, and confidence, by calling two bubble screens immediately after a successful run play, or just going to alot of pass plays immediately after a few good runs. Teams know this about Garrett- that he will, at first chance, ditch the run in favor of aggressively attacking down the field. There is no patience in setting up a good pass play, and the running backs are not utilized, period. The offense is built on Bamboo and straw this way, and will only lead to failure.
He has not ever shown the willingness to beat a team with the run, save a couple of years ago against the Redskins.

There is alot more to a successful run offense that run/pass ratio. People who are simpletons about what makes a good run offense always will talk about run pass ratio’s, while real Run offense coaches talk about they’re offensive line, and draft accordingly.

"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"

by DallasPalace on Sep 17, 2010 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

I know that you are love with the run game.

Just keep in perspective that a strong run game is no guarantee of gaining a playoff spot.

The Titans had one of the most potent running attacks in the NFL with Chris Johnson last year, but they ended up 8-8 and without a playoff berth. The same could be said for the Panthers and DeAngelo Williams. They had the leagues 3rd best rushing game but ended up 8-8 and outside the playoffs.

By contrast, do you know which two teams came in 31st and 32nd in rushing last year? They both won their divisions hands down. One had a record of 14-2 and the other was 13-3. I’m talking about the Colts and Chargers.

Don’t get me wrong, a run game is a good thing, but it is not a MUST thing in today’s NFL.

by BishopWest on Sep 17, 2010 2:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hang on...

Vince Young doesn’t give the Titans to have a balanced attack. He’s not exactly Dan Marino back there.

When CJ and VY and the fullback were in the backfield, I always thought they were running a Full House.

I think you have to be able to have your offense be able to take advantage of a defense’s weakness, whether it be run defense or pass defense.

Against Dallas, you’d probably throw the ball to the deep middle until they stopped it. That’s what worries me about Chicago. Johnny Knox could catch a couple down there and bust them…

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Respectfully

The Dallas Cowboys are the example of a strong passing game is no guarantee of gaining a playoff spot either. Our run game is almost non-existent, and there is more than one reason for that.

I am not championing the Cowboys to go back to being a run-oriented team. But I am wanting more production from the run game. A QB’s best friend is a strong run game. Romo will win it all if we help him. That’s the way the coaches have to think. Unfortunately, by way of seeing what the Cowboys have done in the draft regarding the OL, I believe that the dysfunctional coaching situation has caused us to become almost one dimensional on offense, and this is what plagues the team. I also believe that the Cowboys would have a very powerful pass offense without Jason Garrett as OC.

"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"

by DallasPalace on Sep 17, 2010 8:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Dallas Cowboys are the example of a strong passing game is no guarantee of gaining a playoff spot either

ummm, in 2007 & 2009 when the passing game clicked Dallas made the playoffs.

I posted this before for you. I’ll exerpt the key part.

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/31/why-passing-is-more-important-than-running-in-the-n-f-l/#more-50127

Right away, we can see that passing efficiency is the most important aspect of performance. At first glance it’s more than three times as important than running efficiency. But that’s before we factor in interception rate, which when added on top of passing efficiency makes passing over four times more important.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 17, 2010 8:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

How do you define "clicked"?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've read it

Is there some point you are trying to make with me Thick and Thin? Have I come out and said that the passing game is unimportant, to the point that you have to keep quoting stats to me to prove something about the pass offense and Garrett? There is more to a football team than having a superb pass offense.

The truth is I believe we have a very powerful pass offense, and it can take us to the super bowl. It’s the little things, like special teams, Field goal kicking, punt coverage, punting and punt returning, defense, and yes…run offense, that also have to play up to part to make a championship run. It is the coaches job to make sure these things happen, and get the right players, call the right plays, and make the right decisions, to lead the team to victory. If those decisions aren’t being made correctly, I have every right as a cowboy fan to question what’s going on. Respectfully though, No stat in the world is going to justify losing big games because of bad decisions.

"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"

by DallasPalace on Sep 18, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Dallas Cowboys are the example of a strong passing game is no guarantee of gaining a playoff spot either

My point was I think the above statement is false. When the passing offense was efficient in 2007 & 2009 Dallas made the playoffs.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 19, 2010 7:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

They scored more points those years...

and turnovers were not the central issue.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 19, 2010 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Blings

I have felt this way since the end of the 2008 season, Jerry was ready to clean house if next year did not end well and both must have decided okay I need to cover my own butt. Wade made himself the DC fulltime and that would mean that whatever time he used to look at the offense now went back to fine-tuning his defense. Wade did this to make it a tough decision on Jerry to fire a guy who is responsible for a top 5 defense with no coordinator to take his place. Jason on the other hand is going to run things the way he sees fit and probably believes that Jerry is still in his corner much in the same way that RW felt that way until Jerry drafted Dez.

The big questions are what happens if this team buckles under and fails to win and make it into the playoffs? If it is because the o-line stays injured and never gets fully health or healthy enough to be decent who is going to be at fault? The GM is safe, unfortunately for this team, will JJ take it out on his coaching staff? Where else can he direct his anger and disappointment, does he have the ability to finally have a moment of clarity and stop his nonsense? If the offense does not score enough points, will JJ then admit that JG is not only not a good enough OC but will probably be a bad HC as well? I think the man with the least amount of heat on him (in regards to the media scrutiny) is going to be garrett. Garrett has his unit underperforming again, it does not look much different from last year, he has less credibility due to the way the offense has struggled to produce points with the skill players he has, will JJ be able to swallow his pride again and admit it was a mistake if the offense flops again?

I think WP has the least amount of scrutiny, because the media and the league knows he is a guy who is under JJ thumb, but can provide a great defense, so he does bring more to the table than JG does at this point in time and over the last couple of years. I wonder if there will come a point in the season where JJ will need to step in and really give WP the offense back and say you need to manage JG, he no longer has autonomy. If this is the season of JJ then he needs to make some moves to let this team run better or it is going to blow up in his face.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Sep 14, 2010 8:19 PM CDT reply actions  

To answer your question...

Yes, I think he will take out the coaching staff if he can’t get the outcome he wants.

I’m not sure what other options he has that don’t involve him becoming “self aware” and hiring a GM. We know that’s not likely.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 14, 2010 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well

I think this might be an overreaction of sorts. Jerry’s critical GM mistakes are actually being offset quite well by our insanely talented scouting department. We have an elite quarterback and wide receiver who both went undrafted. We have an all-pro nose tackle drafted in the seventh round. Think about that, those make up for all of the picks we’ve wasted on inane players (whom I believe I don’t even have to mention by name). So besides Jerry pulling the trigger on moronic trades (which I believe his son Stephen is putting a stop to A.S.A.P.) there’s no reason why a structure like this couldn’t work. I understand you want a head coach to get his players fired up and be accountable, but seriously? These are professional athletes getting paid millions of dollars. They’re not children, nobody ever had to tell me when I was playing football to go hard on every play. These guys are playing at the level they’re at because they have that fire, and if they don’t they won’t be playing in the league for long. Nobody wants to be a bad player or make stupid plays, but that’s what happens. Alex Barron’s problem? It’s not that he has no heart he’s just dumb. He’s just a big dumb ox. If he didn’t care he would have just let Orakpo pass him by and kill Tony Romo. No, he had a brain fart with his technique and panicked. Unfortunately he was our best option at that position and we went with him. I can’t blame Wade Phillips, Jerry Jones, Tony Romo, or the RHG himself for Alex Barron’s decisions. It happens to great players too. Favre threw a wicked pick to end the Viking’s season. Does that INT somehow fall back on Childress?

As far as Wade Phillips goes, Jerry’s watching the games. He understands football (believe it or not). When his defense holds the opposing team to two field goals (should have been three) there’s no reason we shouldn’t win that game. If anybody’s on the hot seat right now it’s going to be RHG.

Speaking of, he threw a few quick screens to Dez so that he could get his first few touches out of the way and play football. I can understand why he would want his rookie receiver to get the quick plays so that he could settle down a bit. But seriously, he was missing two starters on his offensive line and he was working with one receiver who hadn’t played a single down in the NFL, and one who’s very close to playing his last down in the league. I praise Jason Garret’s game plan for this game, talk all you want about not having an identity but when your line is this erratic than of course you’re not going to have a solid identity on the offense. I wouldn’t trust our starters + Marion Barber to run tough out a 3rd and 1 for a hard fought first down. Why should RHG? If anything, our offense does well because of Jason Garrett and when we head down to the red zone our weakness on the line is expounded.

If anything, this falls on Jerry. His insistence that Roy Red Zone Williams stays on the field as well as his failure to adequately address the line (but I mean hey – they don’t grow linemen on trees and the linemen we have drafted have been misses for the most part) have kept this team from making the next step. Michael Irvin said it himself, you’re playing 10 on 11 football out there and when you can’t get separation from London Fletcher or catch a pass that hits you in the hands you really are a non factor on the field

Honestly, our coaches are top notch. If anything, I like having one person focused on the offense and one focused on the defense. Say what you want about continuity but Ray Lewis went out and said it the year they won their Superbowl, their defense was a separate entity from the offense. Our GM should have been let go though :P

by G_SWAG on Sep 15, 2010 4:54 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I think you're way off base on so many points...

that I may not have time to get all of my disagreements in a single reply, but here goes;

Jerry’s critical GM mistakes are actually being offset quite well by our insanely talented scouting department.

Really? I think those guys you mentioned (Romo, Austin, Ratliff) all were picked up during the Tuna, Ireland, Payton regime.

Those scouts you are referring to are now on the hook for taking Felix Jones over Chris Johnson and Reshard Mendenhall. Their performance in drafting (or not drafting) O-linemen is the single biggest reason you’re chirping about how dumb an ox Alex Barron is.

Sorry to say it, but you’re just off base here.

I praise Jason Garret’s game plan for this game

Sheesh, where do I start? So you like calling the same play twice when the defense stopped it cold the first time? You like the OC not calling for a kneel down after the debacle over whether the holding penalty was accepted or not? You like calling plays that take you away from inside runs that are gashing the defense and have you establishing dominance at the LOS in favor of trickery?

G_SWAG, are you Jack Patera? Are you in favor of making the Statue of Liberty play our bread and butter play?

Finally, this.

Honestly, our coaches are top notch.

Well, lessee here…

We got a HC who just won his first playoff game after 4 tries and then got handed another bashing at the hands of the Vikings. He’s now 1-5 in the postseason. Sorry, but top-notch means something a bit different. Our DC is a very capable man. Our OC has one of the most (notice I didn’t say “most” because I don’t want to re-hash that whole thing with JimmyK-ByeDawk-ByeGoc) talented stable of playmakers in the NFL and hasn’t been able to generate a consistent offensive identity for this team since, his so-called nemesis, T.O., left town.

Top notch? Maybe in Detroit. Not in Big D.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

wrong about the scouting dept Bling

Ciskowski has been the team’s head college scout for a while, going back to the Tuna, Ireland era.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Another inaccuracy

Cisky was Assistant Director of College Scouting up until January of 2008 when he was promoted to the head scouting job. He was a peer of Brian Gaine,w ho was director of pro scouting.

So who gets the credit for Carpenter and Jacob Rogers? I don’t know how to assign credit and blame for these things, but clearly the 2009 draft is not a good omen. With 12 players selected in that draft, only Victor Butler and John Phillips look like long-term keepers right now. The 2008 draft has one major hit (Jenkins) and then guys you have to question based on who else was up there and what the team needed.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

actually 2008 draft was better than that

Jones, Bennett and Scandrick all have the potential to be very good players, every bit as good as Jenkins.

I don’t care what Ciskowski’s title was, Raf has said many times he was running the college scouting department during Parcell’s tenure.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

There seem to be a lot of facts you don't care about

…and potential be damned.

Show me something on the field.

You said Isaiah Stanbust had potential. He had potential all right…potential to end up on the trainer’s table.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

find me another draft in 2008

thats yielded an electric back like felix, a TE so good at blocking that hes practically a member of the offensive line, a solid #3 cb and a potential all-pro in Jenkins…..

I may be wrong, but I think by the end of this year we’ll be talking very positively about this draft.

by foyesboys on Sep 16, 2010 3:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Let us hope so...

but don’t expect the same to be true about 2009.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 16, 2010 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

That discussion isn't about that Foyesboys

it’s about player evaluation, and clearly, I can see where there could be some questions asked about why a certain player was taken over another.

But generally speaking, the quality of the playersd taken I’m happy with. I am not happy with the total obvious “blind eye” on offensive linemen in the first two rounds of the draft for say the last…..5-6 years?

"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"

by DallasPalace on Sep 19, 2010 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

…that’s why I’m here, buddy.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 16, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

You want to know who else that regime drafted? Anthony Fasano, Bobby Carpenter, et al. – which is why you need to give credit to the scouts that Jerry put into place. They say there are 4 different kinds of scouts, the best scouts being those who can see a player for their potential, and generally that’s what our scouts have accomplished. The scouts generally fall under the General Manager, and as you probably know that is Jerry Jones. Tony Romo had two offers, one for Denver and one for Dallas – he chose Dallas. Miles Austin actually ran a 4.24 40 yard at the combine, and he still went undrafted.

This is where my coaching comment comes into play, we have Ray Sherman, Hudson Huock, Joe Juraszek, and et cetera coaching our players. Believe me when I say that’s top flight NFL coaching talent. Hell, the Eagles fired their strength and conditioning coach citing Joe Juraszek’s work with our team.

Jason Garrett’s game plan was on the money. Hindsight is 20/20, but we gained 380 total yards on offense. You don’t luck your way into that kind of production. Again, for having two questionable backups on the line and two questionable receivers on the field (two of the four no longer being liabilities, two of the four being as big of a liability as we always thought! Haha) I think he called a great game. If it weren’t for all of our drive killing penalties, I can see us scoring 3-4 touchdowns. Again, I don’t see how the players failing to execute (i.e. dropped passes or penalties) falls onto RHG. Yes, I do agree he made critical mistakes going for it on the half, and those two smoke screens I think had more to do with getting D. Bryant #88 the football into his hands in order to calm down a little bit; but other than that he did well. I understand your wanting to run the ball more, but we had 103 yards on the ground. If the Cowboys run for 103 yards and pass for 277 and out gain their opponent by a buck you’d probably say that’s a game we won. Norv Turner went for the Hail Mary at the end of his half too, it just so happens nobody fumbled the ball – you’re not questioning Norv’s body of work based on that one call like you are with RHG.

Your main point is that there’s such a disconnect between our head coordinator / defensive coordinator and our offensive coordinator that it’s creating a schism that renders our team ineffective. I disagree, I think that our team can (and has) flourished in this environment. You say it’s not enough in Big-D but I have some news for you, last year was the first playoff game we’ve won in over a decade. I think we should look at ourselves not as Superbowl favorites every year but more as a talented team trying to make that next crucial step.

Oh, and Roy Williams, as much as I want him to succeed (for the sake of our team at least) – is going to have to go. Every dropped pass is like a holding call from Alex Barron.

by G_SWAG on Sep 15, 2010 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

money quote

“Again, I don’t see how the players failing to execute (i.e. dropped passes or penalties) falls onto RHG.”

Truer words have never been written.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 15, 2010 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, here we go again with that

You still talking like that Terry?

You talk always that players failing to execute has nothing to do with coaching.

Do you remember what happened to Sherman Williams when he fumbled?
Jimmy Johnson Cut him. Maybe you should try explaining that away as player execution has nothing to do with coaching?

"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"

by DallasPalace on Sep 17, 2010 1:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

it's because it doesn't

and Johnson cutting Williams had nothing to do with coaching, it was a psychological move by a HC who knew that area very well. Not all HCs know how to play mind games with their teams like Johnson did.

Ultimately though, Jimmy was considered a great HC because of his players executing at a high and consistent level for a long time, HOFers who expected perfection from themselves. Coaching had nothing to do with that.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 17, 2010 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Utterly ridiculous

On sunday night, we saw how good coaching enhances execution. The Skins made few mental errors. Credit Shanahan and his assistants for their attention to detail.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

now thats ridiculous

Skins made their fair share of mental errors, it was just over shadowed by our bigger mistakes.

If you want to blame the coaches for lack of execution, go ahead and make them a scapegoat. The blame goes to the players in reality however.

I’m glad Jerry sees it the same way.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 18, 2010 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're glad, huh?

What’s that gotten you (or the Cowboys)?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

...and one more thing!

If Jerry agrees with you, how come the season-ending debacles over the last 3 years have fallen squarely on the shoulders of the O-line and yet, there’s only been one player change in that group???

Huh? Huh? Answer me that smarty pants!!!

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

The proverbial "Chicken or the egg" debate with Terry..

Blings, you should know better than to get into Terry’s all-time favorite topic for a debate:

“Lack of player execution has nothing to do with coaching”

Your reaction should be “Oh really?”

To which he will inevitably say the players are to blame for they’re lack of execution.

I can’t believe you didn’t think of asking Terry the obvious question after his response to my post!

The question is as obvious as the nose on Terry’s face!

‘How do you think Jimmy Johnson would react to a player’s lack of execution?"

It’s not as good a question as your Jerry/Oline question, but it’s still a valid question for Mr. player execution himself!

"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"

by DallasPalace on Sep 19, 2010 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

I still want to know what he thinks and why...

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 19, 2010 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Good comments

Okay, here we go…

I always thought Romo chose Dallas because of Sean Payton, a fellow alumnus. Isn’t that why Dallas had interest in him?

As for the scouts, you won’t find any argument from me about the scouting and drafting in Dallas being sub-par from Lacewell to current day (although I think it has improved). Isn’t the fact that our O-line is sketchy and thin an affirmation of that?

Those assistant coaches you mention don’t have bupkiss since Jimmy Johnson left. I’m not about to give them any credit that they don’t deserve.

Garrett’s game plan was indescribable. Well maybe not, let me take a shot at it.

‘Gain a bunch of yards by putting the defense on their heels and then call a couple of plays that have no resemblance to anything we’ve done up to that point to see if we can forestall our momentum’.

Whaddya think? How’d I do?

Players will make mistakes. It happens. You hope it’s a minimal number, but even the best teams have to overcome adversity that comes from mental errors. That’s why they are the best teams.

G-SWAG, this was the same kind of offense we saw last year. Gaudy yardage numbers and not many points to show for it. Tell me why you’re so enamored with that kind of performance, please?

Didn’t your whipping boy, Roy Williams, catch the pass that would have won the game for us? Did he drop a ton of balls on Sunday night?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

You have to give credit to the coaches. I mean Ray Sherman has produced Miles Austin. Hudson Huock – Doug Free. John Garrett – John Phillips. That’s where coaching comes into play, if these guys were all NFL caliber starters then why were they all drafted in later rounds? I guess that’s where I can honestly say that we do have some fine coaches, they take diamonds in the rough and shine them up really well.

Jason Garrett’s job is to put players into a position where they can make plays. I think he does a good job of doing so – we could have Bill Bellicheck here and still have the red zone problems if the penalties we commit continue to stop our drives better than opposing defenses.

As far as Roy Williams, there was a deep post he ran where he cut between the two safeties – Tony threw that ball right on his hands and it would have been a huge play and put us in field goal range. He didn’t catch it, and a big opportunity was wasted. His final stat line was 7 targets and 3 receptions for 21 yards. Jason Garrett called a perfect play to put everybody into position, and he couldn’t make the catch. Are you somehow saying that’s RHG’s fault for not running the route and catching the pass himself? I think the problem may lie slightly with RHG but I don’t think he’s as inept as you portray him to be.

by G_SWAG on Sep 16, 2010 2:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, and while I do believe Tony was initially attracted here by Sean Payton; our tattered QB depth chart probably had the most influence in him coming here. But, not everyone offered him an opportunity to even join their team, so that’s why Dallas (and ultimately Jerry) get credit for it.

by G_SWAG on Sep 16, 2010 2:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

That is what I have read as well.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 16, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm late to this post - so much going on at BTB these days

’blings, another great and thought provoking post.

This team/organization is Jerry’s, and built the way Jerry thinks it should be. One of the problems, IMHO, is that the communication between HC and OC, outside of games, involves GM more than in most other organizations. This is how Jerry wants it, and he signs all the checks, so only Jerry can change it.

As long as Jerry is making gobs and gobs of money, he is not likely to make any fundamental changes. If the team has a bad year, he will fire somebody, but I really don’t see his management style changing. I think that would only happen if there was a total team meltdown, and even that might have to be a multiseason event to really change Jerry.

He has built box of shiny toys. And it’s hard to argue with a man who income during the time he takes a dump exceeds my yearly take.

I said some similar things in comments to another post, if you think this sounds familiar.

Oh, and one piece of advice, 5blings. Quit arguing with Terry. He is obviously a politician, who is morally and intellectually incapable of ever, ever admitting to any kind of error whatsoever.

If at first you don't succeed - blame someone else.

by Tom Ryle on Sep 15, 2010 9:32 PM CDT reply actions  

I thank you, Piney...

and I welcome all points of view.

There have been several times (okay, several may be stretching it, but at least a couple) where I have been swayed by the persuasive and passionate opinions presented in these threads.

It’s why I enjoy it on this site so much. Everyone has a chance to make their case. Editor, Writers and Posters are all on equal footing here. Often times, you find that there is no true ‘right and wrong’ when it comes to the sporting endeavor that is the NFL. I hope I speak for everyone when I say that it’s the set of varied perspectives coupled with the spirited (and clean) dialogue that makes this a great place to spend a portion of my free time. It is THAT dialogue which is so enthralling and is elevated to a height unmatched anywhere on the web because of the quality of content, and by extension, the quality of the fans.

Long live BTB.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 15, 2010 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

That sounds like a pro-Cowboys article if ever I heard one

Check out the comments below. Seems like a lot of people disagree with ol’ Todd.

I think his examples don’t work for the same reasons that G_SWAG’s don’t.

Rex Ryan hired Brian Schottenheimer and Rex is always jawing at the offensive players (like Sanchez) when he comes off of the field aftera mistake or a TD. when do you see Wade having that kind of interaction? They both know Rex is the boss. Fact is, if Brian has a run like Jason has had recently, you tell me if you think he lasts into the third year of an offensive decline.

Mike Shanahan hired Jim Haslett. Same issue. Each one knows who the boss is.

Perfect example in San Diego, where Norv got AJ Smith to fire Ted Cottrell and let Norv hire his man, Ron Rivera. Norv is clearly the boss and is very involved with the defense. No question about the hierarchy and performance accountability there either.

So let me say this again. I don’t have anything I could submit as tangible evidence to support the idea I’ve posited here. It’s a hunch, a theory, based on body language, statements that don’t add up and everything I know about structure and accountability. But if Dallas continues to see quirky play calling that leads to games lost when the defense plays at a high level, I think this idea will then start to carry more weight. Don’t you?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 16, 2010 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree that the situation never seemed like it would work well.

However, I’m giving Jerry the benefit of the doubt (and this is squarely Jerry’s doing).

While its and unorthodox arrangement, I think that Dallas is actually doing a great job of developing/coaching players, and in the end that will be telling rather than sideline communication.

I also think Garrett is in a similar situation with Houck as Wade is with Garrett. I believe that Houck is a Jerry appointment.

I think you’re wrong about the gameplan though. I’m perplexed that people don’t see that the gameplan was coordinated. They played a conservative, low risk, offensive game and were going to let the defense win it. Garrett didn’t call 40 runs but he did call all short, high percentage passes. Just compare the last series with the rest of the game. If you can’t see the difference between the strategies maybe your parents should get a rebate from the state.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 16, 2010 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I keep asking them to request the dollars

…but California is broke.

Ah well.

I never considered Houck. It’s a great question. I’m not sure where Garrett’s head was on that one.

I think where your comments hit the third rail is that the offense was having some success, but always seemed to call a play (or plays) from some hidden flap in the playbook that derailed the momentum that had created. In that context, I find it hard to understand that anyone would say it was “coordinated”.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fact is, if Brian has a run like Jason has had recently, you tell me if you think he lasts into the third year of an offensive decline.

What do you mean? Are you saying that Dallas’ offense has been in decline for 3 years?

You realize Dallas’ offense was #2 last year, right?

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 16, 2010 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

If yardage is your sole metric, I'm happy for you

It’s not mine.

In fact, what makes their offense seem even more impotent is that they gained all of those yards (#2 in the NFL as you say) and were middle of the pack on points scored.

When yardage translates into wins more so than points, I’ll be calling on you to talk me off of the ledge.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

When yardage translates into wins more so than points, I’ll be calling on you to talk me off of the ledge.

some things to consider
-how does the starting field position, produced by the defense, effect the offense’s ability to score
-do turnovers forced by the defense effect the offense’s ability to score

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 17, 2010 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Field position is a product of many things

…to say it is solely the the defense that determines where Romo takes his first snap on a given possession is a falsehood.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

FYI, if I make a point there's ususally some basis for it ...

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/Archive_3280_Dallas’s_doomsday_scenario.html

Among playoff teams, the Cowboys created the fewest turnovers, and that situation has a big impact on Scoreability: even prolific quarterbacks and offenses need gifts from their defense.
 
And in this respect, the Dallas defense did not uphold its end of the bargain. That’s part of the beauty of Scoreability: it’s a team-wide measure of success. Stat geeks and number munchers like to measure units in a vacuum. But in reality, individual units do not play in a vacuum. They each lean on each other for success. Scoreability measures that relationship.
 
The final table shows the percentage of each team’s drives that started in opposing territory – most likely due to a turnover or special teams play. As you see, the Dallas offense had to do a lot more work than other teams just to achieve the same results.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 17, 2010 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Okay, I just HAD to look at this more closely because it didn't sit well...

First, if you look at the stats, here are some things to ponder;

Carolina was 4th in defensive turnovers but 21st in points scored. Assuming turnovers lead to field position and field position leads to points (as you suggested) this one doesn’t work. Could they be the aberration? Buffalo was 5th in turnovers but 28th in points scored. San Francisco was tied for 5th with Buffalo…oof, 18th in points scored. New York Jets? 8th in turnovers and just a hair better than the Niners at 17th in points scored. Just to finish this one off, Tampa was 10th in turnovers and 30th in points scored.

Let’s put that little scoreability thing to bed, shall we? There’s much more to scoring than this simplistic CHFF gobbledygook.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Let’s put that little scoreability thing to bed, shall we? There’s much more to scoring than this simplistic CHFF gobbledygook.

I think a little humility might be in order …

What’s the common denominator with Carolina, NYJ, San Fran, Tampa, and Buffalo?

Their offense’s were bad. 19th, 20th, 27th, 28th, and 30th.

There’s really no excuse for why you overlooked it as that is exactly how this began. Remember? I was answering the question ‘how can all that yardage not turn into points?’ Well apparently you have a new question. ‘How can good field position not equal points?’.

Answer: Its the other side of the same coin. Good field position doesn’t turn points if your offense doesn’t gain yards the same way that yardage doesn’t turn into points if you always have bad field position.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 18, 2010 7:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

So I see you agreeing with me, indirectly...

The scoreability thing is only a fraction of the story.

Let’s not talk past each other when, in actuality, we both agree that turnovers that come from an opportunistic defense, coupled with a well-run, opportunistic offense leads to points which generally leads to wins.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

One more thing I'd throw out

Is this a chicken and egg issue?

The teams that had high “scoreability” seemed to all be offenses that were prolific.

One has to wonder if the ability to go on long drives early in the game and get up on your opponent forces them to be less balanced, take more chances, force more passes and thus, make it easier for the defense to be opportunistic?

I asked this question of BishopWest a long time back and I don’t think we ever got to the bottom of it, so the mystery still remains unsolved.

But, it stands to reason, no?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Field position is a product of many things

In terms of % of drives starting in the opponents territory, Dallas was 28th.

What’s your explanation for that?

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 17, 2010 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Did you see our special teams return game lately?

Better yet, did you see what a guy like Javier Arenas can do to for team’s field position on Monday night?

I noticed New Orleans was high on the chart.

Don’t they have some ex-Heisman (whoops!) winner returning kicks on that team?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

shocking

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is that supposed to make me feel better Thick and Thin?

Respectfully, who cares where they are ranked? Look at our teams talent for crying out loud. If you think for one moment that our offense has done better than 3 years ago, i would say simply this- our success in winning the division has just as much to do with our divisional foe’s sliding downward just as much as people will say that our offense has gotten better. It has gotten better, but it has gotten worse in an area it needed to get better at for us to win it all- Offensive playcalling and the run offense.

Our coaching on offense has kept us out of winning it all, period. I’m not sure, with the right OC, if we wouldn’t have already won 2 or 3 super Bowls in the last 5 years.

"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"

by DallasPalace on Sep 17, 2010 1:30 AM CDT reply actions  

DallasPalace

I think there is some evidence you are overlooking.

First, take a look at this link. To sumarize: passing equals winning.

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/31/why-passing-is-more-important-than-running-in-the-n-f-l/#more-50127

my favorite quote:

When I was little, my dad taught me the inanity of the "running leads to winning" fallacy. We’d watch a game on Sunday, and invariably we’d hear the announcers talk about how a team always wins when their star RB got at least 25 carries or so. They’d wax poetic about the noble nature of pure, old-fashioned, run-it-up-the-gut football. My dad would say: "Yeah, by that logic, teams should start kneeling in the first quarter. Kneeling leads to winning, right?"

Second, via out our own O.C.C., what is Dallas’ actual passing efficiency and defensive passing efficiency allowed.

http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2010/8/24/1636409/stats-ill-watch-closely-this

You’ll see Dallas was 3rd in passing efficiency but 17th in passing efficiency allowed by the defense.

In general, I find that the people who (i) understand the role of passing and (ii) understand how the offense and defense ranked love Garrett (as they should since he’s responsible for a lot of the success).

If you go back to OCC post and look at the passing efficiency differential you’ll see that the best teams have the largest differential and the worst teams have the smallest differential. Dallas is 7th and that basically all because of the offense. The defense is no better than average.

Finally, Wade is working with the NFL defensive player of the year and lots of 1st round draft picks. JG doesn’t have Peyton Manning. JG’s best players are 2 UDFA that were developed: Romo and Austin. Take a look at the spreadsheet below. It’s instructive.

https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aq_pzudn-VEDdGlIUFlybjJSbXRRUVpvVVFhYW1LZHc&hl=en

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 17, 2010 7:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

While none of this has been a response to me...

I’d just like to say that I’ve been mostly satisfied with Garrett in his tenure here. I just didn’t think that this was one of the better games he coordinated in.

AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.

Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.

by Iron Fist on Sep 17, 2010 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Makes you wonder what we'd be like on offense if Payton had stayed

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why don't you hazard a guess?

I am interested to know what you feel would be different in the Cowboys’ current system if we swapped Garrett for Payton. Do you think we would have a more disciplined offense? Would we readily put up more points on the board? Would our O Line perform better?

Personally, the guy is miss is Sparano.

Movie Reference

by accidental innuendo on Sep 18, 2010 7:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think Dallas' pass routes would be significantly deeper

Payton is a risk-taker and likes to put the ball in his playmakers’ hands while they are moving. Garrett’s offense seems a lot like Norv Turner’s, where the ball is delivered to a spot based on timing. I do think the Red Zone offense would be radically different in that instead of a two-TE formation that JG likes to employ, Payton would spread the defense out more and make them tip their hand.

In trading for RW and drafting Bryant, I think they have been trying to find another Michael Irvin, who uses their body to shield the ball from defenders and then muscles their way for tough yards. Clearly, RW hasn’t shown that. Dez might be that kind of player.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

A tremendous point about the draft leaning toward the defensive side of the ball

…but you have to assign blame there to the scouting and personnel department. I’m in the boat with you on that disparity though…

In the end, however, yardage without points can help keep games close, but that doesn’t pan out in big games and playoff games.

In fact, our offensive point production in the last 3 season ending games has been 26 points.

Let me say that again. Three games. 26 total points scored. Less than 9 points per game!

I doubt anyone cares about our yardage in those games, do you?

No, the offense seems to be wayward at this moment. I don’t know why, but it is.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think most would say that the 'why' has to do with the fact that we are a very mistake-prone team.

And when I say mistake prone I mean we do the small things very poorly at times such as limiting penalties, getting to the line quickly, etc. If you want to put that on Garrett in general, that is your prerogative, but I see that as a more systemic problem of the players that make up our offense and specifically our offensive line. Kosier and Free are maybe the only o-lineman you would describe as cerebral and that is a problem as the other three have a tendency to more make big mental gaffes with missed assignments and penalties than should be expected for players of their caliber. I am of the belief that Garrett has been game-planning around their deficiencies for a while now and that is why you see him stay away from running the ball a ton since that would lead to grind it out drives, which this team doesn’t specialize in. It is for this reason that I am so prone to harping on our defense for a lack of turnovers. As long as our offense has to go 70 or 80 yards every drive (the average needed yards for a TD against Washington was 73!!!) they will never put up the 28 points per game that they should be capable of otherwise.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 17, 2010 8:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Turnovers caused by the defense are a wonderful thing

But if you had the New Orleans defense that gives up more yards and more points but gets more turnovers, would you be any better off?

If your defense can keep the other guy from scoring, then our $67 million dollar QB and the bevy of high-priced skill players should get a TD from time to time, no?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its hard to say if your team would be any better off depending on the degrees to which you are talking about

but if our defense got more turnovers and better field position it is almost certain our scoring production would go up. And would I trade New Orleans’ defense for ours? Probably not since we do have a good offense and the boost in the long run won’t be necessary in my opinion. However, would I trade our defense for one run by Dick LeBeau or Rex Ryan? Yes I think I would since those respective defenses hold down yardage and create turnovers; something ours doesn’t.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 18, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Both of those defenses get better play, on passing downs, from their DE's...

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

True but both get worse push from their OLBs.

I think what sets those defenses apart from our defense is they each have a great, great player in the secondary (although Jenkins could further blossom with any luck) and the coordinators are more creative than Wade in attacking an offense with their zone blitzes and coverages. I really like Wade as a defensive coordinator, but I just will never be able to put a Wade defense on the same level as those defenses as long as we continue to be a bend but don’t break defense (which is key for field position) and not force turnovers.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 18, 2010 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, that argument flies in the face of what Fan in Thick and Thin was saying

His point was that Wade’s defenses hurt our field position.

So which is it???

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 7:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's what I am saying.

Wade’s defense and its bend-not-break style has hurt our field position since it gives up 30 yards before it gets a defense off the field.

Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels

by Creasy729 on Sep 19, 2010 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

So let's look at this relative to Sunday Night's game...

Dallas won the ANYPA battle and lost the game. The problem with statistics is that they are lagging indicators of success or failure and in the NFL (and any sporting endeavor for that matter) and they are not predictive of success in any way, shape or form.

What they need to come up with, and OCC and I go back and forth on this, are statistics that evaluate the play in the trenches. Which team wins the battle when offensive lines meet defensive fronts? Who is more physical?

The point I made in the post is that Garrett and Wade don’t mesh well. Wade wants an offense that can chew up clock and put 20-24 points on the board. HE wants his defense to take care of the rest.

Garrett seems to have other ideas.

And there should be some sort of numerical value for boneheaded plays like Scandrick’s!!!

There…all better now.

:-)

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 17, 2010 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

You know Blings

I never really had a problem with how and when and why Garrett was acquired. Still not bothered about that, really. Wouldn’t surprise me if Wade was never bothered about all that either. Garrett was a hot commodity and Jerry wanted to sew him up in some capacity. So, he went for it. But….you are right, Wades’ defense prevents points a lot better than Garretts offense scores points. That has to be a sticking point for Wade. You’re also right in that it comes down to points. Are we to believe the line is cerebral enough, quick enough, and physical enough to obtain all this yardage, but get in the red zone, for instance, and all of a sudden, just…..aren’t? No, I’m more inclined to believe opposing DCs’ make adjustments in various circumstances to maximize their teams potential advantage for that circumstance. Our OC doesn’t respond in kind.

by stargazer33 on Sep 17, 2010 11:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

One thing I believe is that you have to be able to run the ball inside the 20...

Dallas hasn’t done that with aplomb recently.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am with you on this

I think Garrett is not the genius that many make him out to be. I think he is a somewhat competent coordinator who gets enamored with is game plans too much and does not adjust well. I know that his defenders can cite to all of the yards piled up by the Cowboys offense the past few years (MORE THAN THE COWBOYS DYNASTY DON’T YOU KNOW!) but when you are in the middle of the pack in scoring, making you distinctly average, that is not good. Not good at all. I think Parcells said that for roughly every hundred yards your offense gains, you should put a TD on the board. How close are the Cowboys to that?

Part of the reason Garrett gets a pass is because with all the yardage the Cowboys rack up, Cowboys players are great in fantasy football. I don’t play Fantasy Football. I am old and cranky, and new things bug the crap out of me. I just want the Cowboys to win, and if the anemic point production continues, that will be difficult.

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

by Seanrude on Sep 18, 2010 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

One stat that was truly telling...

If you were below the league average in scoring, you missed the playoffs. If you were above it, your likelihood of making it was extremely high.

Now, how teams score is one that needs more cerebral minds than myself to look at all of the unique ways teams do it. You didn’t have to be a 55/45 split on pass/run to make it. You just had to utilize the players (on both sides of the ball) in ways that helped your team score. I’m sure OCC could write a treatise on that one.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dallas won the ANYPA battle and lost the game.

You’re taking the wrong lesson from this. The right lesson is that Sunday’s loss was unlikely. There’s a 90% correlation between winning the ANPY/A battle and winning. However, it’s not 100%. That means that 1 out of 10 times a team is going to win the ANPY/A battle and lose. And you know what, Sunday makes perfect sense in that light. It took a defensive TD and a game winning TD being negated for Dallas to lose. You have to make major blunders to win the ANPY/A battle and still lose, which is exactly what happened.

The problem with statistics is that they are lagging indicators of success or failure and in the NFL (and any sporting endeavor for that matter) and they are not predictive of success in any way, shape or form.

Basically everything you wrote above is wrong. I discussed the difference between forecasting and correlation some in the original post (I’m not sure if your confusion was caused by the way OCC phrased it which was admittedly poor).

http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2010/8/24/1636409/stats-ill-watch-closely-this

Two points.

1. Looking at the statistics after the fact definitely helps you understand what the key variables are.

2. You can most assuredly use statistics to calcaulate game probabilities. Brian Burke does it for the NYT correctly calling the winner over 70% of the time.
 
http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/28/be-skeptical-of-my-super-bowl-prediction-colts-in-a-close-one/

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/advanced-nfl-stats-week-4-game-probabilities/

How accurate should a good N.F.L. prediction system be? Picking simple winners and losers can’t be that hard. It’s obvious who the better teams are, right? What would you say, 85 percent? 80 percent? The answer may surprise you. The best systems out there, even the consensus favorites from betting lines, couldn’t break 70 percent this year.

When the Fifth Down approached me about posting my game probabilities last summer, I was a little apprehensive. Although my system had a strong record of success, I feared it could be due for a down year. Mark Twain wasn’t completely correct when he said, "It’s better to stay silent and look a fool, rather than speak and remove all doubt." If you really want to remove all doubt about your foolishness, publish predictions in The New York Times. Fortunately, my model had its best year ever, exceeding 70 percent accuracy.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 18, 2010 7:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

So...

You’re saying I was right, but it was an anomaly?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dallas won the APNY/A battle. Dallas also lost.

That’s an anomoly, yes.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 18, 2010 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe a good regular season stat (I'm sure there are many)

…but not predictive of playoff success.

Last year, SD was #1(they lost in the playoffs to #27).

The Vikes were #2 and they lost to #5 New Orleans.

  1. GB lost to #16 Arizona.
  1. Pittsburgh was a playoff no-show.

So was #8, Houston as was #9 New York Giants.

Maybe not so anomalous?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I hate how BTB doesn't recognize the # sign

That should have said GB, who was #3, lost to #16.

Also, #6 Pitt was absent from the post season.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure what you’re referencing. For some of the teams I have the same rankings. For some I have different.

Are you maybe mixing offensive ranks & differential rank? For the differentials I have:

1. NO was #2 and Min was #9

2. SD #3 lost to NYJ #17

3. GB #1 lost to Ari #13

4. Pitt was #10

5. Hou was #8

6. NYG was #16

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 19, 2010 7:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry, I looked at NYPA not ANYPA

But the point is still the point.

It the higher ranked teams lost to teams whose ANYPA was much lower. I don’t think the anomaly statement holds up for our friend with the Times.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 19, 2010 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

I used this link and sorted by ANY/A

…under passing offense.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2009/

Why would these be different (albeit not much) than what you have?

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 19, 2010 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

i took the data from PFR, so it should be the same.

i included the raw data in the google spreadsheet in this post if you want to compare. I checked again and the figures look correct..

http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2010/9/18/1696485/whos-winning-these-games-anyway

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Sep 19, 2010 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

If stats are not predictive of success in any way, shape or form...

What good is there in stats that evaluate the play in the trenches?

:o)

Movie Reference

by accidental innuendo on Sep 18, 2010 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

It would tell you who we would cut next week

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, there have been many that went much longer...

But I find this whole thing about whether a kneel down is a play or not HIGHLY amusing.

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

What's the debate about?

It costs you a down doesn’t it? Then it’s a play.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Eric Nadel

by TXHC on Sep 21, 2010 1:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's a play

NFL Glossary

play: action that begins with a snap and ends with a dead ball.

by BishopWest on Sep 21, 2010 2:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

and It always seems to be 5blings

I may be wrong,(It has happened before), but it seems that 5blings’ posts seem to generate alot of comments

"Of all the things I have lost , I miss my mind the most-Random T-shirt

"There is a fine line between Genius and Insanity"-Unknown Author

by I draft the Cowboys!!!! on Sep 18, 2010 3:14 PM CDT reply actions  

I hope that means that my posts get you thinking and WANT to comment

I see a ton of people who say, " I’ve been lurking on here for a long time but never commented".

That drives me crazy. This is everyone’s blog and everyone needs to participate.

Remember what connects us!

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 18, 2010 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

It does for me at least

I am not the most active member but i do make a few comments here and there. Mostly on your posts…….

"Of all the things I have lost , I miss my mind the most-Random T-shirt

"There is a fine line between Genius and Insanity"-Unknown Author

by I draft the Cowboys!!!! on Sep 18, 2010 9:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Although

If you take out the Terry “Victory Formation is not a play debate” you probably lose about 150 comments…..LOL

"Of all the things I have lost , I miss my mind the most-Random T-shirt

"There is a fine line between Genius and Insanity"-Unknown Author

by I draft the Cowboys!!!! on Sep 19, 2010 10:07 AM CDT reply actions  

Timely

Marshall Faulk just repeated every single thing I wrote in this post on NFL Network’s Sunday Morning show.

Of course, Irvin totally disagreed with him.

Faulk even went on to talk about how statements like “they work well together” and “it’s a good working relationship” are really just Dalrymple spin.

Yeah, feeling pretty good about myself this morning. Waitress! Another bloody mary and stat!!!

"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."

- John Wooden (God rest his soul)

by 5Blings on Sep 19, 2010 10:45 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Demarco_murray_st_louis_rams_v_dallas_cowboys_baxpocve6rkl_small
Headed in the Right Direction...(Delusional or Reality)
Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...
Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants
Small
A LETTER TO MIKE JENKINS...
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys Athletic D-Linemen

Recent FanPosts

222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
2012: Random Thoughts about Anything but a Quiet Offseason
Small
Beat the Pass Rush
Small
Romo and the Super Bowl Question
Small
How much does pass rush matter?
Ryan_2008_small
Is Tony Romo an Elite Quaterback?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn