Cowboys Lose To The Bears? No Way!
Yesterday, I was driving around listening to fans call in to ESPN1250: The Zone, listening to their complaints about Alex Barron, Jason Garrett, yadda, yadda, yadda. It's given that fans vent after a loss. That's what we've all been doing here the past few days. Surely, it will happen again down the road this season. But not this week!
One caller told Cowboys fans not to be "surprised" if they lose to the Bears. Not to be surprised? The entire sports world would be surprised if the Dallas Cowboys lost their home opener to the Chicago Bears! Vegas isn't known to lose more money than it makes, and it still has the Cowboys as 8.5 point favorites--just tempting folks to throw down on the Bears!
Okay, enough with the exclamations. Time to get declarative. The Cowboys will beat the Bears. Too cautious? Fine. The Cowboys will not only win the game, but they will even cover the spread.
No, the old version of Biff did not pay me a visit. Call it blind faith or whatever you want, but the fact remains: the Cowboys should beat the Bears. There is no reason why they shouldn't. Any commentary that suggests Dallas lacks heart or does not work as hard as other teams is complete speculation. As OCC pointed out, talent drives teams to success. And I think even the harshest critics of America's Team would agree that the Cowboys are a much more talented team than the Bears.
Even if Dallas beats Chicago 72-0, that doesn't mean it is primed to win the Super Bowl. It's just one game, just one step in a long process of trying to improve every week. Even in blowout games mistakes are made. Last Sunday night, we witnessed just about every mistake a team could make when the Redskins Cowboys defeated the Cowboys. We here at BTB have analyzed, theorized, and scrutinized the loss down to the most minute details, as any passionate fans would. We've grieved and offered numerous suggestions at how the team can improve. With all our heart, we hate to see the Cowboys lose. Imagine how the coaches and players feel.
The team realizes its mistakes and Wade Phillips told the media what they want to hear about working on preventing penalties, improving technique, and the shoulda-woulda-couldas from Week 1. That 0-1 record doesn't look good to anybody, but you have to figure that the team has moved on past last weekend. While all the world has been discussing Alex Barron and DeAngelo Hall, the team has been preparing for Week 2's home opener at Cowboys Stadium. Much like a cornerback getting burned on a deep pass, it has to forget in order to recover. As the great Troy Aikman said:
"Losing doesn't eat at me the way it used to. I just get ready for the next play, the next game, the next season."
Over the next few days leading up to Sunday's game, expect the fear of 0-2 to be pumped into your ears. And it won't stop there. The words "must-win game" will echo around every media outlet as they peak ahead at the Cowboys' Week 3 matchup at Houston. Sitting where they are, the Cowboys can not afford to worry about the Arian Fosters and Matt Schaubs and Andre Johnsons. Now, and until probably next Tuesday, it's the Jay Cutlers, Mike Martz's, Tommie Harris', and Julius Peppers'.
As with most teams, the focal point of the Bears often concerns the team's quarterback Jay Cutler. As any quarterback who fancies himself a team leader would say, the Bears can be their own worst enemy.
"The only people [team] that can stop us, is ourselves," said Cutler.
Well, the Lions almost stopped them. To be fair, Cutler had himself a productive game completing 23 of 35 for 372 yards and two scores. He did, however, throw a pick and lose a fumble. Perhaps he blames himself more for those turnovers rather than crediting the Lions defense, which sacked him four times and recovered two other fumbles. And the biggest highlight reel from that game not featuring Calvin Johnson was Cutler's dumpoff pass to Forte, which somehow caught every Lion out of position en route to an 89-yard touchdown just a minute before halftime. Prior to that point, on their own home turf, the Bears were down by 11. To the Lions. Just as I made use of the strikethrough above when discussing the Cowboys' loss, Cutler must consider his team superior to that of the Lions.
And Cutler is probably right. If that be the case then the Cowboys can only lose to the Cowboys this weekend, right? Are they not considered the more talented team? The Bears committed four turnovers to the Lions and went on to win thanks to NFL Rule 8, Section 1, Article 4. After all, Pro-Football Focus did come away impressed with Cutler's performance.
This was a real improvement for Jay Cutler (+4.5), as he overcame a strong defense, poor pass protection and multiple fumbles to win the game. He looked much more in control, and if he can just cut out the poor deep throws over the middle, he will be well worth the cost of the picks to the Bears. He threw three times into the deep middle (more than 20 yards) and was 0 for 3, including an interception. If you took just those throws into that area away, his passer rating would have increased from 109 to 131, and our pass grade from +4.5 to +6.5. He actually performed better when pressured and his actual rating when hit or hurried was 132.9.
Jeff Hughes at Chicago Now's Da' Bears Blog suggests that Cutler could very well have another strong outing against a "not very good" Dallas secondary.
While their pass rush is intimidating, it's also creates massive holes for a mobile quarterback to step into and deliver the ball down the field. They don't have a very good secondary and if Donovan McNabb weren't wretched at throwing the football, the Skins could have struck for twenty-yard gains at two or three big moments in the game.
Mark my words: the Bears will have an opportunity to hit something big down the sideline.
Kudos to the Bears for putting up 19 on the Lions. But every game is different. And this one is a road game for them against a much tougher opponent. I know they have Peppers and Brian Urlacher and the Cowboys have an aging offensive line. But who would you rather have at left tackle: Doug Free or Chris Williams? If there is any position on the O-line the Cowboys could use youth, it is there with Free protecting the quarterback's blind side.
Consider Tony Romo. Other than being a little tentative in the pocket and getting away with a would-be late pick last week, he had a solid game. He gave his team a chance to win, which is what you want, what you need from your quarterback--no matter what the score is.
There is still talk about the lingering effects of an unproductive preseason and an inability to score in the red zone, but that has to come to an end soon doesn't it? The coaches have had enough time to work these kinks out; we just need to see the results.
I don't fully doubt this Dallas team yet. It's way too soon. The ship is ready to sail. Romo is ready to connect with Miles Austin and Dez Bryant. Roy Williams is ready to be an end zone target. Tashard Choice is ready to show he doesn't fumble. DeMarcus Ware is ready to notch at least a sack a game. Jay Ratliff is ready to beat double teams. And David Buehler is ready to get back to booming kickoffs and making 34-yarders.
I will one-up that aforementioned caller. Bears fans, don't be surprised if the Cowboys beat the spread. Come Sunday, I will be looking for them to double it.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks Aaron...
Finally getting past Sunday night and looking forward to the next game.
I hope you right about everything too.
Go Cowboys.....Go White Sox.....
Jeff Hughes is on crack...
He’s the first person I’ve ever heard to say the Dallas doesn’t have a good secondary. All three of Dallas’ corners are solid, two went to the Pro Bowl last year, and the safeties are above average at the least. They might not be the ball hawks other secondaries are, Jenkins excluded of course, but no one ever said they weren’t good.
Dallas' safeties are average at best
I think the corners are top-10 to be sure, maybe top-5.
I think the big hole in this team is its safeties. What a team that generates this much pressure, a ball-hawking safety could have a field day. But this team has never had a safety with the talent to take advantage of the opportunities.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Sep 16, 2010 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions
I think Sensi has played very well for us...
last year, besides the Vikings game getting beat deep. But he’s easily been an upgrade over RW.
I know it was bad...
but his performance over the whole season, especially since he had a freakin cast on his arm during the first part, was I thought above avg.
I think so too
I think the jury is also out on Ball. Hes certainly not going to be great, but I think at absolute worst, hes hamlin while being a slightly less sound tackler. Maybe he’ll make plays on the ball more often – who knows?
Yep. We'll just have to let the season unfold.
I just didn’t feel too good about him since he’s been on the team for a few years and didn’t really show anything. It’s almost like he’s being forced into the role because he’s cheaper than Hamlin and not too much worse.
for a team with average safeties
wade sure showed a ton of confidence in them last week. He was bringing the house every other play
All of 3 are solid???
Scandrick is not even worth mentioning in the same sentence as Jenkins and Newman. Honestly tell me one game where you can say Scandrick has been solid…he is starting to become a liability for us.
whoa whoa
he is not jaqueves reeves or whatever his name is. Scandrick is solid. Ease up
Really?! Really?!
He is not even close to being solid...
i would gladly change my opinion the day i see him play a complete game without getting exposed in coverage
He's going to have his chance to prove his worth
Indy, Chicago, Arizona, Green Bay, New Orleans, and Philly all like to spread you out. Scandrick is going to get the test of his life as a 3rd corner this year. We should know exactly what he’s made of by January.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Sep 16, 2010 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions
your point of veiw is bizarre
Scandrick is very good. WTF are you stammering about? Complete game? His stats bear this out. He’s an excellent slot CB with starting potential
by AustonianAggie on Sep 16, 2010 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Potential doesn't mean you anoint him as an elite CB....
so the writers are correct when they say our secondary is not elite..he had a chance to start and he looked awful competing with Jenkins. Show me the Stats…how many INTs has he had in comparison to the others in the secondary…
He doesn't need to be an elite CB...
just a good 3rd CB. I’d rather have him than Jacques Reeves. He’s getting beat all over the field.
shut down corners dont play the slot for a reason
Seriously in today’s passing league where nickel cb is a starter/3rd wr is a starter how can you say Scandrick not even close to being solid. If he wasn’t there is no way the cowboys rank 1st in scoring defense.
Go back and watch the giants playoff game and you’ll see a slot CB getting exposed his name reeves
Seriously you are way off on this one
Really?! Really?!
Yeah, I think anybody covering the slot receiver is going to give up some catches.
It’s difficult covering the slot. There’s no sideline to help the CB. There’s no way there’s a “shut down corner” in the slot.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
name me a better 3rd cb...
I’m not saying scandrick is the best out there, but nickel cb is a hard position to play in this league, and many teams don’t have one. He is solid. Cowboys fans shouldn’t have to be reminded of what a bad nickel cb looks like. Go watch the playoff game against the giants in 2008 again.
Yes, solid...
I don’t see any other teams 3rd corner making pro bowls either. Scandrick is a solid number 3. Now, if he had to replace Jenkins or Newman, I’d be a little worried, but we’re talking about the slot here. Slot corners need to be better in zone coverage, something Scandrick is best at. As a man-to-man corner, he’s slightly above average at his best, so he can be had, but so can ever other teams 3rd corner.
Would you rather see AOA there instead?
slot is the hardest position in the defensive backfield
1) you don’t have the sidelines to help you get position on your man.
2) you don’t have the visibility and pursuit angles that a safety can have.
3) unless you are in a zone package, you are often reacting to the route and playing catch-up.
you have to cover your man that can literally go in any direction except backwards. And you often times get blamed for the failed zone assignments, and you have to content with a lot of route traffic in the middle of the play.
It’s a tough job. And you won’t stop every play. It’s guaranteed.
I think Scandrick is fine.
The Cowboys had better win
There’s going to be a lot of losses on this schedule. When you play tough teams all year, some of them are going to beat you.
The easiest way to 9-7 was to win all the home games except New Orleans, win at Washington, and win at Arizona.
So now with “easy-ish” games we can only get to 8-8. Chicago is an “easy-ish” game. And they’re not a bad team at all.
It’s too early to talk about “must-win” games, but needless to say, a loss here would make the season a big uphill climb to make the plyaoffs.
The Cowboys need this game.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Sep 16, 2010 3:52 PM CDT reply actions
Not 9-7, I meant to say 10-6 which usually secures a playoff spot
by Blue Eyed Devil on Sep 16, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions
we beat saints in NOLA
why wouldnt we beat them on thanksgiving… first its in our house and second cowboys play every year on thanksgiving they know how to manage that week best
Really?! Really?!
we already lost at washington...
"Texas Stadium has a hole in its roof so God can watch his favorite team play." ~ D.D. Lewis
"Nope. But I have only been here nine years." ~ Walt Garrison, when asked if he had ever seen Tom Landry smile.
"How 'Bout them Cowboys!" ~ Jimmy Johnson
by Portland's Cowboy fan on Sep 16, 2010 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Boys and the Bears
I dont doubt them at all right now. I saw no reason in that Redskins game to think they are not capable of moving the ball down the field. Defense played well. At least against the Skins. It was only the first game of the season and they had some fixing to do after preseason.
Now if they lose to the Bears, I will have a bit of a question mark. Especially at home.
The secondary is young in places. They will grow.
Maybe no outstanding players there, but they are able to step up when they have to.
My book opened Cowboys -9, and it's now Cowboys -7
Maybe it drops to Cowboys -5 by kickoff… Wait to place your bets until very late if you plan to take the boys ;)
Nice post, Aaron.
That guy saying the Cowboys secondary is “not very good” must be counting the turnovers from last year.
All we need to do to make up for that letdown in Washington is win a game we aren’t “supposed to win”, as in last year’s victory in New Ahlins.
So which one is it going to be?
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
Good post.
I also think the Cowboys will bounce back and play well.
Playing well and winning when they feel they have something to prove is not what should concern us about this team; rather the opposite—when they experience success, that’s when they tend to let their guard down and the lack of discipline and stupid stuff creeps into their game.
"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach
why do people dis our Corner Backs?
ridiculous. I hope Cutler comes out firing at Mike Jenkins. Jenkins is good at getting picks
ravens cutt mcaan , dallas picked em bk up today on ps ... yesss !
woman !, dont try to understand em, dont try to make them understand you, for they are a breed apart ! lol
WaHoo! Home Again
Been looking all evening for news on McCann…where did you see it? And thanks.
Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules.
There is some truth to this:
“it’s also creates massive holes for a mobile quarterback to step into and deliver the ball down the field. They don’t have a very good secondary and if Donovan McNabb weren’t wretched at throwing the football, the Skins could have struck for twenty-yard gains at two or three big moments in the game.’
I was very frustrated that while blitzing the Boys didn’t do more to stay in their lanes and keep McNabb from escaping. You can’t just go blindly running right past the guy. And it’s not like they don’t know McNabb.
I like the rush but hope they use their heads too.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
And the Cowboys secondary IS very average
Newman is up and down and getting older, Sensabaugh isn’t special, just reliable, and Ball is an unknown, probably just average player.
Jenkins is the only one who stands out.
Also you kinda have to include the nickel LB in this discussion, along w/ Scandrick. They’d better get one of the young guys in for Old Brookings soon.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
What a Stupid thing to say!
Newman is one of the best corners in the league and is regularly covering the best receiver on the opposition.You are entitled to your opinion,but you are flat wrong.BTW how many yds did the Redskins gain in that game,McNabbs completions,tds for the offense? We beat ourselves,period.
Wade Phillips first Super Bowl win is as the Head Coach of the Dallas Cowboys!!!
by NVCowboy4Life on Sep 17, 2010 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions
I wonder if now...
Jenkins starts covering the best WRs.
stupid is rather personal isn't it?
can’t you just disagree?
Sheesh.
“Newman is one of the best corners in the league”? That’s an opinion, not fact. He’s getting older now, this is 2010. He got beat quite a bit last year and is susceptable to muscle pulls etc.
He’s OK, a ‘B’ average CB.
Funny you didn’t address my comments about safety or nickel LB, or Scandrick’s struggles though! What’s up with that? It’s ‘stupid’ to mention one player when the word “secondary” includes the whole group. I said our secondary, as a whole, is average.
Do you really think that after Newman and Jenkins all the other players back there are so great??
Ball, Sensabaugh, Scandrick and Brookings are ‘A+’ players??
Finally, your argument about how many yards the redskins picked up is pointless. The whole tack of this is discussion is, is that really because the secondary’s so great? Or, because the front 7 applies pressure, making them look better than they are?
Did you follow that part?
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Sep 17, 2010 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Newman
is a B #1 cb. He is top 15. Thats still really good. He did an outstanding, ridiculously good job on Jackson last year. Giants fans fear Jackson like the devil, and we don’t care about him. Thats in large part because of newman.
Jenkins imo is a #1 quality cb and still improving. I’ll wait to say hes out newman’s level til he does it consistently, but another year like last year and he’ll widely be considered a top 10 cb
Scandrick is a heck of a lot better than he gets credit for, definitely. The guy gives up like 3 catches, 2 of them to santana moss, and he gets ripped by everyone and his brother. And this is while Wade is bringing the house every other play, leaving his cbs on an island. Again, if you want to see BAD nickel play, go look at Jacque Reeves in 2008. Scandrick isn’t great or anything like that, but we could do far worse. You won’t find many teams with 3 cbs better than ours.
I think our safeties are around average, I think sensabaugh does a quality job on TEs. Brooking is clearly deficient in coverage, I won’t argue that.
That's fine
overall you rate them a solid B, I’d say B- / C+ depending on Newman’s health, which is chronic, I’m not talking a big injury but whether he can play 16 full games ever again.
But we’re not so far apart I’m ‘stupid’!
It’s a matter of degrees.
I’m not one of the Scandrick haters here, and I never jumped on him after one game. But last year, I’d say he was pretty average overall. I’m hoping he makes the 3rd year jump this year.
I don’t like the excuse that he’s in the slot and it’s tough. If he was better than the other 2 he’d be starting, simple enough. He’s in the slot cause he’s not as good!
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Sep 17, 2010 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions
One thing about the 1st game
The stars certainly seemed misaligned. I’m not saying that everything that could have gone wrong did, but there did seem to be some times when several things failed at once.
I would elaborate, but I am looking forward now. Hope the ‘boys can hang a whuppin’ on da Bears.
If at first you don't succeed - blame someone else.
I agree with you Aaron...
I had Washington covering the 3.5 spread last week. I thought Dallas wouldn’t win a close game by more than a FG and could very well get beat due to OL injuries. I think they smoke Da Bears this Sunday with Cutler trying to force stuff against Dallas. I think Free will be fine.
Oh, forgot to comment also about your nice last writeup, Aaron, about Wade needing to grow a pair and take over the team, so to speak. NFL Films had a bunch of Saints film from last year. Sean Payton, even though he’s obviously an offensive coach, can be seen yelling at the defense and paying attention/being involved even when they don’t have the ball. I worry that Garrett pretty much answers to no one but Jerry for the offense.
yeah. we should handle this squad and win by double-digits...
I do think they will put some points on us. But I think they’ll give us some turnovers too.
I’d prefer 35-10 but I’ll take 10-7. As long as we get the W, I’m not trippin’.
"They need security in the world, Craig!"

by 
























