Cowboys Vs. Redskins: Jason Garrett Better Get His Jedi On
In the Star Wars movie franchise, whenever the going gets particularly tough for one of our intrepid heroes, he or she invariably offers the same response: "I've got a bad feeling about this." I begin with this foray into geekdom because it describes exactly the emotional state in which I currently find myself as we crest the hill on Redskins week.
Why, you ask? Sure, I'm not in love with the offense's lack of production in the preseason, particularly against San Diego and Houston. Yes, the defense, which looked damn near impenetrable for the best part of the first two games, was pushed around thereafter. Okay, there have been injuries to key veterans, many of whom might not be back in time for Sunday night's tilt. But even had none of these problems arisen, even if the 'Boys were completely healthy, even if the O-Line had been blowing open massive holes as the offense drove relentlessly to paydirt before taking a preseason powder, I suspect I'd still be approaching opening night with great trepidation.
To explain why, I ask you to consider the most frustrating Cowboy losses over the last two seasons. For me, the losses that ended each of the past two seasons were less frustrating than freeing. In each, a version of the Peter Principle was at work: it was clear that this team had risen as high as it could and was now fighting out of its class. Certainly, the Arizona loss in '08 sucked eggs, on multiple levels. But no, the ones that still smart are three particular road losses: Pittsburgh in '08, and last year's defeats at the hands of the Broncos and Packers.
Any Cowboy fan will instantly recognize that these games share a common narrative: Cowboys' offense looks terrific early and Dallas jumps out to an early lead but then, as the game progresses, begins to have trouble. The opponent scratches back into the game. A gallant defense begins to tire, an offensive miscue or a special teams blunder leads to an easy score, the offense can't respond, and the gig is up.
Perhaps the most unsettling aspect these losses share is the degree to which the offense--and specifically the offensive line--became increasingly over-matched as the game went on. The indelible images of these games are running backs being met at the line of scrimmage, Romo under intense pressure from multiple angles and untimely turnovers, typically caused by an unblocked blitzer. In the latter stages of the aforementioned '09 losses, the offensive line seemed to be in utter chaos, resulting in pre-snap penalties and missed assignments.
Of course, all three of these defeats were to teams that employ a 3-4 defense.
The NFL is all about matchups. In recent history, the Cowboys have demonstrated that they do not match up well with 3-4 defenses that have the ability to send a variety of rushers. The Cowboys' O-line is strong at the point of attack when they can get their hands on opponents; however, some of them (I'm talking to you Andre and Leonard) tend to no move their feet well and thus have difficulty latching on to moving targets. Given that the 3-4 defenses rush a lot of linebackers and some defensive backs, the Cowboys' linemen particularly struggle to get their hands on them.
Moreover, as the NFL Network's Brian Baldinger noted recently, the Dallas O-line is not a particularly cerebral bunch. They are slow to recognize stunts, dogs and other blitz games. Typically, the center makes all the line calls; Gurode, however, has always had a hard time doing this, so Kyle Kosier has taken over this responsibility. One problem: Kosier won't play on Sunday.
The various problems presented by 3-4 defenses are exacerbated when the Cowboys are on the road, especially when the hometown fans begin to sense that there is chum in the water. Well, here we are: a season opener against a 3-4 team on the road. To compound the anxiety this matchup produces, two of the Cowboys O-linemen, including Kosier, the one interior lineman who actually does move his feet and get to the second level well, are almost certain to miss the contest.
In the week following the previously discussed debacles, Jason Garrett has been the recipient of a great deal of Cowboy fandom's collective vitriol: he abandoned the run; he didn't throw to Witten enough; he called too many plays designed to go to Roy WIlliams. Blah blah blah. While it is probably true that Garrett tends to panic a bit when the Dallas O-line is getting whipped (the '08 home loss to Washington joins these games in that category), one must still wonder: what is an offensive coordinator supposed to call when the big uglies are having their backsides handed to them play after play? The special package that doesn't require blocking? Punt and hope the returner fumbles?
In the various Star Wars films, the good guys tend to get out of unfavorable matchups--those situations that give them bad feelings--by relying on and trusting in The Force. When the bad guys have you surrounded, sometimes that's what you have to do. Given recent history, and the current state of the Dallas O-line, a trip to FedEx Field is looking like a trip to Cloud City: it could go either way. I suggest Garrett will need to pack his light saber; to get to 1-0, the Cowboys are definitely going to need him to get his Jedi on.
57 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I really don't think the 3-4 applies as much with
the Skins though. They don’t exactly have the personnel for it to work and it’s brand new to them. This is their first true test. I don’t see Jason Garrett getting outgunned by a rookie 3-4 team.
Semper Fi Do or Die
Projected 2010 Record: 12-4. You heard it here first
What about green bay?
They were a first year 34 team as well and they didn’t have an orakpo
How 'Bout Them Cowboys!!!!
by emmitt22 on Sep 9, 2010 1:18 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Also
I remember a lot of their players were pissed at Capers about the system. Their defense I don’t think was that great last year, but shut down Dallas for some reason.
In Washington's last year as a 4-3 defense, they were better on D
than Green Bay was in their last year in the 4-3. Hey, the ‘Skins have talent on defense…but one of the scary things about this situation is it might not be a matter of talent, but that the Cowboys can’t handle the scheme.
GB has way more talent than the Skins
their 3-4 is pretty good
add a good secondary with that
the Skins have Orakpo who I fear but nobody on that defense scares me besides him
Exactly
Questionable secondary and their front 7 minus Orakpo is not built for 3-4. The Packers were built for it regardless of whether or not they wanted to. Haynesworth would be great in it if he had any personal pride
Semper Fi Do or Die
Projected 2010 Record: 12-4. You heard it here first
The Cowboys look strong enough to pull the ears off a gondark.
Haynesworth is a slimy piece of worm-ridden filth, and Shanahan is now consumed by the Dark Side (ie the Mother Effing Washington Redskins) . Romo is the Jedi. The Force will be with us, always.
"Drinks are on me if Lewis posts >168IP and an era lower than 3.86." by RangerMad on Jan 20, 2010 12:36 PM PST
You should write a novel
Seriously your abilities to describe people in such stark and forceful language are pretty amazing I really like “slimy piece of worm-ridden filth”, that’s good my freind. LOL
Just becuz you put yer boots in the oven don't make it bread
by dcfansinceiwasababy on Sep 9, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions
I guess that......
This would make JG = Obi Wan, and WP = YODA :-)
Daniel Snyder would make a great evil overlord lol
"My days of not taking you seriously have certainly come to a middle"
Wade isn't as wise as YODA
but I can imagining him green with pointy ears and a few beers and….yeah I can see this
Just becuz you put yer boots in the oven don't make it bread
by dcfansinceiwasababy on Sep 9, 2010 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions
I dunno
Doncha think JJ maybe C3PO?, oh and I got it, Camillus as YODA !!! Wade I just dunno where he goes in this saga, I’ll have to think on it some more. LOL
Just becuz you put yer boots in the oven don't make it bread
by dcfansinceiwasababy on Sep 9, 2010 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Absolutely
Just becuz you put yer boots in the oven don't make it bread
by dcfansinceiwasababy on Sep 9, 2010 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions
reality
we are the better team. nuff said.
we shut them out at the end of last season and we beat mcnuggnugg
3 times.
preseason dont mean a damn thing.
may the force be with you….
Tough Game
All three great Super Bowl winning teams of the 90’s had the same thing in common. They all lost that year to the Redskins on the road. Winning games on the road in your division or in your conference in college ball is difficult at best.
Just saying..
Well ain't that just great
Now I gotta pray for the Cowboys too? To Saint Jude? (patron saint of lost causes) sheesh now I’m depressed
NOT:
WE ARE THE DALLAS COWBOYS WE ARE THE FORCE
ok this is my light sabre to keep my spirits up, this piece doesn’t help. but I wouldn’t want anyone to blow sunshine if there are cloudy skies in our near future.
Just becuz you put yer boots in the oven don't make it bread
by dcfansinceiwasababy on Sep 9, 2010 12:58 PM CDT reply actions
I am puzzled by why the 3-4 is such a problem for the Cowboys
I mean, they don’t have to search the Empire to find a good 3-4 defense to practice against. I think this is the line that hit me the most:
Moreover, as the NFL Network’s Brian Baldinger noted recently, the Dallas O-line is not a particularly cerebral bunch.
How much does that contribute to the problem? The best blocking in the world doesn’t help if the blockers are not in the right place.
May the Force smack the Deadskins upside the head.
If at first you don't succeed - blame someone else.
I think that's the biggest problem.
Not too many guys in the league strong enough to get past Gurode or Bigg. But too many have run around them untouched. That is the most aggrevating thing to me. They played together for three seasons and still can’t consistently pick up stunts and blitzes.
Hopefully, the Redskins Schwartz isn’t as big as ours.
I disagree
Davis seems to lack the strength he used to have. Do you remember Romo’s interception against the Chargers? That was caused by Davis getting pushed back 5 yards into his face, he had to released the ball right as Davis was backing into him.
I really worry about Davis.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Sep 9, 2010 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions
No, I didn't see that
But would definitely be a concern. If Bigg isn’t stronger, he doesn’t have much else.
Love the "Dark Helmet" reference! LMAO!
"It's not by chance that I bleed Razorback Red, it's what God intended for us all!"
As I said before
RUN, RUN, RUN and when they get tired of running, run somemore. If Dallas can run on Washington, they have no chance.
Lock n Load
"Do or do not... there is no try."
From Jerry to us fans: “I find your lack of faith disturbing….”
From Tony to Dez early in the 4th quater: “YAHOOOOO! You’re all clear, kid. Now let’s blow this thing and go home.”
And a general quote for the entire team: "FedEx Field. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious."
Go Cowboys!
Go Cowboys.....Go White Sox.....
Great kid! Don't get cocky!
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Sep 9, 2010 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions
McNabb may be sick of Ware and the Boys by now.
This is the 3rd game in a row he’s played the Cowboy. Strick 3 you’re out.
Lock n Load
Oh Yes You Will
You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
It’s called The Linc. FedEx Field is a day trip to Disneyland in comparison.
"You have to have a stronger belief in yourself than the disbelief of others."
Antonio Ramirez Romo
big up
to the new writers
really enjoyed the new writers articles on here props guys
that Akwasi piece was awesome I really loved that, good info that wasnt exactly known maybe before to some of us and this piece here has humor and creativity
loved the Star Wars theme to it
It's not impossible.
I use to bullseye womprats in my T16 back home. They’re not much bigger than two meters.
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
I feel like a jerk cuz I was home for much of last weekend and never turned on the Labor Day Star Wars festival.
I think it was on FX or something.
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Sep 9, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions
spike
made my gf watch it for the first time… I was very proud we sat throw all three
Really?! Really?!
Did you tell her..."I have you now."?
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Sep 9, 2010 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Dang
that’s a little overboard
Just becuz you put yer boots in the oven don't make it bread
by dcfansinceiwasababy on Sep 9, 2010 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions
That only makes sense
if Jar Jar Binks has a speaking role in all three
If at first you don't succeed - blame someone else.
The Deadskins
are nothing but Bantha fodder.
by Satch30 on Sep 9, 2010 3:33 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
A serious answer to the post: Short passing game, extra protection.
Garrett relies too much on mid-length routes, pass plays that have to develop.
Saying run the ball doesn’t work when there are no holes.
He started adding WR screens last year, although I’m not a big fan of those.
We all call for more screen plays to burn the pressure. But also, keep in 2 blockers, only send out 3 guys, and let Romo use his skills to get a lot of short passes. They won’t always be open, but it’s better than watching Romo and RB’s get smacked.
I’ll add-this is why FelixJ needs 50% or more of the carries. He’s the one that can make defenses pay-one screen, one run that busts through, and it’s a big play.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
I agree
I would think that if Romo starts hitting the quick slants and screens, the ’skins have to tighten up the coverage. Then you go over the top.
One thing is for sure: If Romo has to look for targets for more than two seconds, the Death Star will clear the planet.
If at first you don't succeed - blame someone else.
What really baffles me
is that the Cowboys offense can go up against one of the best 3-4 defenses anytime in practice. And OC Garrett can get all the tips he’ll ever need from DC Phillips.
Or is it perhaps also a measure of the quality of opponents? Denver was on a tear early last year, GB and the Chargers later in the season were no slouches either. Mysteriously perplexing.
by One.Cool.Customer on Sep 9, 2010 5:17 PM CDT reply actions
Sure
but it would appear that 3-4 defenses provide particularly unfavorable personnel match-ups. Perhaps our slowfooted tackles were outclassed by the speedy edge rushers. Perhaps the inside linebacker games gave Dallas too much trouble. Perhaps it’s the interior line having difficulty latching on to moving targets.
Whatever it is, the Cowboys faced three 3-4 teams last year, and lost all contests. Coincidence?
by One.Cool.Customer on Sep 9, 2010 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions
What we all need to remember is...
Tony Romo can throw twenty picks in one game and come back to win it. But he can’t get sacked twenty times in one game and come back looking better than Brad Johnson.
That actually brings up a thought… Has anyone ever noticed that the more down the field plays the Cowboys run, the more successful they seem to be? It’s crazy, but whenever it’s crunch time and they have to get down the field, they always seem to pick up huge yardage on the plays.

by 






















