Five Moments That Altered The Cowboys' 2010 Season: #2-Tony Romo' Injury
Last week, I began a series in which I'll count down five key moments in the 2010 season. As I stated in my intros to the previous iterations (#5 is here; # 4 is here; #3 can be found here), the moments I'm interested in examining all either represented or forced a larger philosophical change that ended up having long-term repercussions during the 2010 season, and perhaps into the future. Today's installment looks at the play that probably defined the 2010 campaign: Tony Romo's injury. As you'll see, I make the case that its lasting impact had more to do with the Cowboys' defense than with their offense.
Moment #2: Week 7: Romo Breaks His Collarbone
There are several indelible images from the 2010 season; the one that is seared most permanently in my memory is that of Romo writhing on the Cowboys Stadium carpet after having been driven into it by blitzing Giants linebacker Michael Boley. At that moment, the 12:07 mark of the second quarter, Cowboys Nation held its collective breath and then, after a pause, quietly told itself that the season was over.
At that moment, however, the game was anything but over. To that point, the Cowboys, playing inspired football, had been blessed by the turnover gods. Interceptions by Terrence Newman and Gerald Sensabaugh had twice given the Dallas offense a very short field, and they had cashed in with 10 points; after a New York TD drive, a Brandon Jacobs fumble set Dallas up at the Giants' 43. The first play, a 14-yard completion to Miles Austin, resulted in Romo's injury. Backup QB Jon Kitna came into the game cold, mucked about for a bit, and the Cowboys kicked a field goal. After a Giants three-and-out, Dez Bryant served up an electrifying 93-yard punt return to extend the lead to 20-7.
Then all hell broke loose. We'll look at specifics after the jump:
The five Giants drives after Romo's injury went as follows:
80 yards, seven plays: TD
56 yards, five plays: TD
19 yards, five plays: FG (end of half)
55 yards, five plays: TD
70 yards, six plays: TD
In 20 minutes of game time, New York racked up 280 yards and 31 unanswered points. For the game, they amassed just short of 500 total yards. The Dallas corners were abused; Manning threw 30 passes in the direction of his four wideouts (Hakeem Nicks, Steve Smith, Mario Manningham, and Ramses Barden), netting 22 completions for a staggering 271 yards. To make matters worse, the Giants running game was a hot knife that eased through the Cowboys buttery front seven. The New Yorkers gained an even 200 yards rushing; Ahmad Bradshaw piled up 124 and the loathed Brandon Jacobs added 75, including a back-breaking 30-yard score.
More important than the yardage gained by the Giants' backs was the way they gained it. Repeatedly, they gashed the Cowboys with the same running concept, in which the back, usually Bradshaw, would start out on an inside run and then cut sharply--usually to the right--into a gaping hole awaiting him in the guard-tackle gap. This play worked so well--and so many times--largely because Dallas OLBs Anthony Spencer and, to a lesser degree, DeMarcus Ware were charging straight upfield at the snap. By doing so, they were literally taking themselves out of the play; all the New York tackles had to do was to guide them along an already-chosen path.
Spencer and Ware's behavior smacked of a desperation that infected the first half of the season but became particularly acute the moment Romo went down. As the losses piled up during the putrid denouement of the Wade Phillips administration, Phillips and his defensive staff were clearly trying to find a way to get pressure on opposing passers without abandoning their core values: stop the run, play coverage, limit big plays (that's not to say they were successful in maintaining these). The second Romo went down, Phillips and Co. seemed to lose all perspective; they began to dial up more blitzes--and more blitzers. The percentage of five and six-man blitzes rose steadily in the three games after Romo went down and Phillips was canned.
I can imagine the frenzied mantra being repeated in position meetings during that final, fatal fortnight: get to the QB at all costs! In heeding this mantra, the Cowboys' defensive players made themselves vulnerable to the run. The great irony herein is that all that blitzing didn't improve Dallas' ability to get pressure on the quarterback. In part because Phillips' scheme isn't predicated on disguising who would be coming, blitzers were typically picked up with ease. Consequently, rival QBs were able to stand in the pocket and calmly survey the developing play. If you can stand to watch the debacle against the Packers again, you'll see Aaron Rogers repeatedly making hay against six man blitzes from a clean, tight pocket.
While he's doing so, his cadre of fleet wideouts is getting open against single coverage. We can debate which position group--rushers or coverers--contributes more to a successful pass defense, but for my money, it's the rushers. In the NFL, no cornerback--not even Deion Sanders in his prime--can blanket a quality receiver for five seconds. When asked how good the corners on those Reggie White-lead Eagles defenses of the late 80s and early 90s were, pundits would respond: how can we know? The Eagles pass rush was so fierce that it didn't matter who their coverage guys were; pass patterns never had time to develop.
My point here is that the Cowboys lack of a pass rush made our coverage people a bit nervous; the desperate defensive measures taken after Romo went down made them hollow-eyed and shell-shocked. So, when the coaching braintrust changed the team's defensive philosophy after Phillips was fired, resorting to more four-man rushes and a much higher percentage of zone coverage, it was too late: the damage had been done. Playing defensive back in the NFL is all about confidence. By the time the Garrett administration took over the Valley Ranch oval office, the Dallas DB's confidence was shot, and they never recovered.
When Romo went down for the count, the season did in fact go down with him--but not for the reason most people thought at the time. His replacements, Jon Kitna and Stephen McGee, played respectably--suberbly, even. But his injury set off an already panicking coaching staff, who freaked out, lost themselves and, by abandoning their philosophy, abandoned their players.
Instilling confidence in his defensive backs--particularly Mike Jenkins--will be new defensive coordinator Rob Ryan's top priority as we head into the 2011 campaign. A good first step would be to give them a decent pass rush...
50 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It was all good though.
We had a bit to do with the Giants not making the Wild Card.
Follow me on Twitter
"All we hear is about that defense, they can't stop a nose bleed." - Bart Scott on the Patriots Defense
Every game has the same amount of value.
We beat them with Kitna as our QB.
Plus I hope you’re kidding. Dodger had an impact, but you don’t lose a big lead because of a punter. It was the defense.
Follow me on Twitter
"All we hear is about that defense, they can't stop a nose bleed." - Bart Scott on the Patriots Defense
Good analysis
of the downward spiral that was Wade’s demise.
He has proven that he is a great defensive mind, I wondered why his D went to hell while the offense weathered the storm.
Maybe he was over compensating.
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
What I loved about that picture
was Tony’s asking immediately if he had completed the pass. One statement shows alot.
This^ ,disproves all the nay sayers on Romo's leadership qualities.
Davie Wilson
"how bout them cowboys"!!!
by scotscowboyfan on Jan 22, 2011 2:48 PM CST up reply actions
A little Off Topic but
Those people wanting Buehler gone, if he was on the team in ’06 Romo scores a TD on that botched snap. Buehler is a football player and would of killed that guy who caught Romo by his shoelace. I never wanna see a kicker like that again.
Or even more recent with Mason Crosby complelety whiffed AND took out two of his own guys. With DB its 11 vs 11 not 10 vs 11
/rant
if anybody but that dwarf grammatica was kicking, Romo would have scored. Vanderjagt was a big guy.
That Seahawks player that tackled Romo didn’t really need to be blocked. Someone just needed to get in his way and impede him ever so slightly, and Romo gets the 1st down at a minimum
Lifelong Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/
When I was watching that game.
I said “HE DIDN’T GET THE FIRST?!” That was my big thing. I was wondering how?
I’m sick of tiring playoff losses. This is what that video reminded me of.
Follow me on Twitter
"All we hear is about that defense, they can't stop a nose bleed." - Bart Scott on the Patriots Defense
True
How come no one remembers the First down that got overturned, When Witten caught the ball. Ugh.
But still I like Buehler as the kicker, in fact I hope Rob Ryan puts in some packages to put DB at LB. haha
DB in on nickle D ,has speed and loves to tackle.
Davie Wilson
"how bout them cowboys"!!!
by scotscowboyfan on Jan 22, 2011 11:27 AM CST up reply actions
I remember that first down, that was a BS reversal
Lifelong Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/
I disagree
Can’t really put that on Grammatica. He didn’t know he was going to need to throw a block, at least not instantly. He did kinda throw a flailing, glancing blow of a block, but by then the guy was already around him. I think if Romo had sprinted for the goal line he could’ve scored. Kinda looked like he was jogging to me, but then again he didn’t know he had anyone behind him.
Truth be told, I was more miffed about not sending all 11 guys on defense to try to get a safety once Seattle had the ball. They took over at about the 1 and a half yard line (keep in mind we were trailing by one point). A safety gives us the lead. Oh, but Parcells the so called genius, calls a base D. Next thing you know we’re gashed for a 30 yard run (or whatever it was). I say again, A SAFETY WOULD’VE GIVEN US THE LEAD, yet our dufus head coach calls a give up play.
by dallas GOON on Jan 22, 2011 11:13 AM CST up reply actions
I am not blaming Grammatica, but if anyone over 160 pounds had gotten in Babineaux's way, that play turns out differently
Lifelong Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/
He really didn't have time to get in the way
If you watch that misery again, you’ll see, it wasn’t the lack of size, it was the lack of awareness/quickness by Martini. By the time he turned towards the defender, it was already too late to get in the way. Now if that had been Buehler, he might have been able to steamroll the guy.
"I'm not gonna hold my head down. I'm gonna fight until this damn thing is over, period!" Jay Ratliff
by APerfectStar on Jan 23, 2011 2:11 AM CST up reply actions
the defender just swim moves right by him. I contend that anyone with bulk who slows Babineaux down at all, and I mean at all, and Romo gets the first at a minimum
Lifelong Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/
I think I need to visit therapy again.
Thanks.
Follow me on Twitter
"All we hear is about that defense, they can't stop a nose bleed." - Bart Scott on the Patriots Defense
by Jeterian 2 on Jan 22, 2011 11:01 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Maybe Nick Folk can come back & kick in Dallas!
Oh wait, he just might do that in the Super Bowl for the Jets.
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
Wouldn't that be a kicker.
Good one, Jim.
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
nick folk isn;t the reason they are there.
He’s not Vinertari
20-29 30-39 40-49 50+ Tot
DB: 8 8 7 4 11 8 6 4 32 24 75.0%
NF:11 10 16 14 6 3 5 2 39 30 76.9%
Ill take DB as a whole package vs NF as just a kicker
Paradoxically...
…quietly told itself that the season was over.
At that moment, however, the game was anything but over.
I like the passion/reason balance. The realistic analysis these articles of yours are providing of a season’s moments which have numbed us, infuriated us, sunk and given hope, even blinded us, with both bad and good.
Gonna live up to your moniker with this one, yet again. Rousing the rabble to Gronk comments, the what-if’s, the works. Supremely unreasonable through superbly analytical, numbskulled through brilliant. Inciting the voice of this diverse fandom to holler and whisper its pains and joys
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
defense fix
Great article on how the cowboy staff panicked.
Let’s face it the NFL figured out Wade’s defense.
Run right at ratlif and let ware and spencer push up field.
The cowboys need a raji / wilfork / rodgers in the middle.
Brent is a great start. Pickup Kendrick ellis or phil taylor in the 2nd or 3rd round and that provides a huge body impossible to move.
Draft a corner and OL and sign an OL in FA.
Amazing how our secondary will be much improved once we get a legitimate pass rush.
by oneforthethumb on Jan 22, 2011 11:51 AM CST reply actions
And it was good they did
Gave us a new HC and DC, and renewed sense of needing to win, rather than show
up and it will happen
Jason Garrett with Romo
Dude went 5-3 without him. Imagine what he can do with him.
Who are you?!
I'm Kick Ass!
Yeah. We saw. 1-4.
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
vey harsh Tan ..
Davie Wilson
"how bout them cowboys"!!!
by scotscowboyfan on Jan 22, 2011 4:50 PM CST up reply actions
No.
A “better” response would be “Yeah. We also saw 7-0.” Then we could get into equivalent game stretches and the like in seeing just what their performance together has been. Plus, I wasn’t being harsh. Didn’t lay the Giants loss on him , though record-wise it gets listed against him as the starter (plus, at injury-time the score was…). Facts is facts.
Now, if you’re talking with JG as HC, well, different story. There’s no data in yet.
Plus, I wanted to respond earlier, say “Shhh, you’re scaring the fish” or the like. But since they’re (he’s?) not biting, I guess I’ll just try another spot. Unharshly, that is. Then again, maybe not.
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
Yes, I know...
I realized that, Fernie. I merely threw out a this-season fact (since the 5-3 was stated and left an opening to) in an effort to provoke response/debate. To perhaps incite. Maybe to “fish” for Romo-supporter response, both passionate and reasoned. Perhaps even to “hook” one in particular.
It was both a serious and light-hearted remark. One of reasoned fact, maybe to provoke a Terry-like response.
Understand now?
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
No offense taken
No offense, but pot-sirrring sometimes plays as good a part in debate as a bad.
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
Maybe, but this is well-trodden territory, and I don't particularly like
that you admit to soliciting “Terry-like” responses. That smacks to me of trouble making just for funsies.
Whoa, Fernie, lighten up, man...
By “Terry-like” (since you quote it) I’m simply giving an example of a response based on passion more likely than fact. All part of the debate dynamic, each side of that equation.
If you want to take it as “trouble making just for funsies”, go ahead. I’m telling you point-blank that’s not what I’m doing by intent. If you can’t accept that, so be it.
Frankly, I don’t particularly like you “reprimanding” me based on your interpretation of what I was doing from the onset.
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
Thank you Chris Gronkowski
For missing your assigned block on Boley and ending Romo’s season. I can’t wait until this guy is replaced.
"I'm not gonna hold my head down. I'm gonna fight until this damn thing is over, period!" Jay Ratliff
Maybe you can't wait,...
maybe you’ll celebrate or whatever. Maybe you mean replace as FB or maybe you mean cut. But who’s to say Romo wouldn’t have gotten up uninjured? Who’s to say “one play does not a career make”? Who’s to say…
Breaks of the game.
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
Seriously!!!
The kid is an UDFA, comes in does a Pretty good Job, makes a Rookie mistake, and you want to cut him? Seriously?
Frankly I don’t Hold Gronk accountable for the injury…If the Defender doesn’t drive Tony into the Ground(frankly I think they should have thrown a Penalty on him) then the injury doesn’t happen
formerly I draft the Cowboys!!!
Yes...I am Ironman....seriously my last name is ironman in German
Knowledge and Skill overcome superstition and Luck-Dawn Patrol
by I am Ironman!!! on Jan 23, 2011 6:44 AM CST reply actions
that was a clean hit. No way a flag should have been thrown
Lifelong Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/
Yeah, part of me wanted the flag because watching it just plain hurt, but it was
clean and there was no way a flag was going to be thrown.
Yeah, Oz, gotta agree with Sean, clean hit. No flag needed.
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
Gronk will be around for a long time
he’s a good player and his lead blocking got better as the year went on.
The bright side is that we got JG as the hc. I was a huge supporter of Wade, but after hearing all the crap about no pads on Wed and no standards period, I’m happy to see him go.
The bottom line of Romo’s injury is that we will be better for a long time.
Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK
This is great analysis, and, I think, absolutely true:
More important than the yardage gained by the Giants’ backs was the way they gained it. Repeatedly, they gashed the Cowboys with the same running concept, in which the back, usually Bradshaw, would start out on an inside run and then cut sharply—usually to the right—into a gaping hole awaiting him in the guard-tackle gap. This play worked so well—and so many times—largely because Dallas OLBs Anthony Spencer and, to a lesser degree, DeMarcus Ware were charging straight upfield at the snap. By doing so, they were literally taking themselves out of the play; all the New York tackles had to do was to guide them along an already-chosen path.
Spencer and Ware’s behavior smacked of a desperation that infected the first half of the season but became particularly acute the moment Romo went down. As the losses piled up during the putrid denouement of the Wade Phillips administration, Phillips and his defensive staff were clearly trying to find a way to get pressure on opposing passers without abandoning their core values: stop the run, play coverage, limit big plays (that’s not to say they were successful in maintaining these). The second Romo went down, Phillips and Co. seemed to lose all perspective; they began to dial up more blitzes—and more blitzers. The percentage of five and six-man blitzes rose steadily in the three games after Romo went down and Phillips was canned.
It was an absolute freak out. As I kept asking at the time, does Romo play defense, too? The utter collapse of the D in the Giants game was the end for Phillips. The only reason he was in Dallas, other than the fact that JJ could control him, was that he was the defensive genius who was going to make his unit invincible. They never were during his tenure; even in 2009, there were hints of bad things to come.
season was over the moment Romo was injured
Garrett taking over as HC was the only thing that made it worthwhile to watch the rest of the way.
In Romo we Trust

by 























