Tracking The Cowboys Offensive Line, Formations And Play Calling
Lost amidst all of the quick reactions to the last two losses that sent the Cowboys to 2-3, has been the play of the young offensive line. Many fans want to point the finger at Jason Garrett for his play calling, and I'm not here to persuade or dissuade you from that stance. I simply will attempt to shed some light into the elephant in the room, that the Cowboys offensive line is the glaring weak link of this ball club.
I've been ironing out the kinks on a tracking chart over the last two games, that will hopefully give us insight into exactly how the game unfolded. At this point, I'm ready to roll it out to help analyze the offense's performance. Plays can and most often get categorized under multiple categories. Here are the ones that I tracked:
| Negative | Negative | Positive | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bad Romo | Bad Vision | Abv Avg Pass Play | Success |
| Miscommunication | Dropped Pass | Positive Line Play (pass) | |
| Quest. Play Call | Offensive Penalty | Positive Blocking (run) | |
| Blocking Mistake | Fumble | Good Vision/Fight |
Bad Romo: Negative plays that have to be assigned to the quarterback. Miscommunication: negative play where it's unsure of who was at fault, QB or WR. Blocking Mistake: Run or Pass. Bad Vision: RB missing an obvious lane. Good Vision/Fight: Includes broken tackles and making the right read for successful run. Success: Gaining 40% of necessary yards on 1st, 60% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd and 4th downs. The rest: Self-explanatory.
Follow the jump for the skinny.
First some notes on how I chalked up the results of the plays. Of course, feel free to ask anything in the comments that you don't think I've been clear on.
- Quick throws where the D doesn't really have a chance to get to Romo do not go in the positive blocking ledger, but can fall into the blocking mistake column.
- Blocking mistakes can be on anybody, but most notably this refers to the offensive line and tight ends with blocking responsibilities from either on the line or the H-Back position.
- If a defensive lineman or rusher gets his hands on the ball, I'm chalking that up to a blocking mistake, and then it is subjective on whether Romo's pass was also at fault. For instance, the first pass of the 2nd half (play #40) counted as both a blocking mistake and ‘Bad Romo'
- Good run blocking means that the runner has 0 or 1 defender to beat to make it past the line of scrimmage.
Now, on to the game analysis.
- Jason Garrett called 74 plays on Sunday; 41 pass attempts, 24 rushing attempts, two sacks, six offensive penalties and one 12-men-on-the-field on the defense.
- The Cowboys success rate, as defined above, was exactly at 50% (counting defensive penalty as success), 37 for 74.
- Here is a breakdown of the Cowboys use of various formations, and their success in doing so.
| 0WR,3TE,2RB | 1WR,2TE,2RB | 1WR,3TE,1RB | 2WR,1TE,2RB | 2WR,2TE,1RB | 3WR,1TE,1RB | 3WR,2TE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # times | 1 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 27 | 25 | 7 |
| Success | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 19 | 7 | 5 |
| Suc. % | 100% | 0% | 45% | 0% | 70% | 28% | 71% |
- As you can see, the Cowboys played the majority of the game in either the Deuce formation (2TE, 1RB) or Three-wide, with alarmingly different results. The deuce formation was used in so many ways, it was dizzying. Both tight ends in the slot, one inline with one in the slot, one inline with one as the H-Back, etc. etc. In total, Garrett called the two-TE sets 35 times, with 24 successful plays (69%).
- "Bad Romo" and/or miscommunications affected six plays in total. Five plays were clearly attributed to Romo (Play # 6, 40, 49, 62 and 66) and two were miscomm. (#6, 28). Yes, play #6 was the interception where under pressure, Romo threw off his back foot in between two receivers in the same zone and right to the defense. Play #66 was the at the New England goal line, tied at 13, when Romo threw the ball at Choice's feet instead of looking at Dez one-on-one along the left sideline.
- The offense was called for six penalties, and they were all either holds or false starts on linemen. Drive killers against a team like New England just can't happen. I can't stress enough how much penalties hurt the team, along with Tashard Choice's hair-yanking fumble, so here's the recap.
| Off. Penalty | Infraction | Effect on Drive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phillips hold on 1st & 10 | No effect. Cowboys gained subsequent 1st down. |
| 2 | Free hold | Pushed Cowboys to 2nd and 18, punt after 3rd down sack. |
| 3 | Kosier hold | negated Def. PI in end zone, would have put ball on 1 yard line |
| 4 | Free false start | 3rd n 9 goes to 3rd and 14, play call safe draw to set up first field goal |
| 5 | Smith hold | No effect. Changes 2nd and 3 to 2nd and 13, but Romo scrambles for long 1st down |
| 6 | Smith false start | Changed 3rd and 13 to 18 while trying to run clock. Team could have gone for a 3rd and 13, but 18 was a give up draw call. |
- On the scoring drive right before the half, the Cowboys drove 92 yards on 10 plays. 90% of those plays would be considered ‘successes' .As a matter of fact, on the two drives bookending the half, the Cowboys were ‘successes' on 17 of 19 plays.
- I counted two questionable play calls, these are plays where I wonder if they had any chance of success, or were the right call for the situation. None of us, save for the handful of coaches we have as members, can really say whether or not these were the right calls. The first was the shovel pass to Choice on play #67 and 3rd and goal, tied at 13.
- The second questionable call was the second run call while trying to run out the clock. It is only questionable to me because of how bad the run blocking had been throughout the game and the front the Patriots were showing (eight up). The idea to run the clock and force New England to use their timeouts definitely falls under the category of playing not to lose, but I don't see how you can really fault Garrett for leaning in this direction. This play fizzled, because ...
- The Cowboys had 23 'Blocking Mistakes' out of their 74 offensive snaps. That's over ONE THIRD of their plays! Now, here's where some forgiveness leaks in for Garrett's passive playcalling on that next-to-last drive. Romo was throwing off his back foot, constantly. There was even a play where I tweeted ' I'm gonna need u 2 keep your eyes open when you throw it Tony '. Romo admitted that he had to take a pre-game shot for his ribs which aren't fully healed and you could see that he was a bit skiddish in the pocket on several plays, falling away from the pass even without pressure in his face.
- On the next-to-last drive, the run blocking was atrocious. On 1st down, the one where any reasonable coach would call a run to get the clock moving, Phil Costa was steamrolled by blitzing linebacker Gary Guyton. Completely reverse-pancaked. On the 2nd down play, Guyton put a wicked-good spin move on Kyle Kosier, while Martellus Bennett looked completely disinterested in stopping his man. Both plays stuffed rookie DeMarco Murray in the backfield.
- On 74 snaps, the Cowboys totaled 23 blocking mistakes, 10 QB/WR errors and one fumble. It must really be difficult calling plays for guys who make play-killing mistakes 46% of the time.
- The total tallies are as follows:
| Category | Count |
|---|---|
| High Quality Pass Plays | 15 |
| Dropped Passes | 4 |
| Positive Line Play(pass) | 16 |
| Positive Blocks (run) | 5 |
| Good Vision/Fight | 20 |
| Bad Vision by RB | 1 |
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
on the 3 and out series....
had Romo thrown a pick they would have run him out of town along with Garrett….so Garrett chose to die a slow death…
but i would have liked to see a screen pass or pitch out on first or second down when they were playing the run up the middle
Tony oh-no.....
probably not....but he also had Dorsett for a good part of those years
is Landry your measuring stick?
Tony oh-no.....
I am tired of all of these play calling questions. That is why I am pulling against the Chargers.
Another meltdown in San Diego, and Norv could find himself calling plays again in Dallas.
by ScarletO on Oct 17, 2011 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I dont know
Would Norv even want to come to Dallas should he get the axe in SD? Is Garrett going to let go of the play calling duties when he has said several times he would not. Is Jerry going to to force the issue?
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
He is the 1 guy Garrett may trust enough to give up control to
But is the new Garrett rushing game different than what Norv runs? I heard Garrett was implementing the Shanahan zone blocking running game. Anyone know? If he has implemented it, I heard in the preseason that it takes a full year of learning before it is really effective. That bodes well for next season. Look at the jump the Skins made in year 2.
by HarrisburgCowboyFan on Oct 17, 2011 8:14 PM CDT up reply actions
it would make zero difference.
Phillips is a whole different league than Romo..
by lostar2009 on Oct 17, 2011 4:58 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
call em equal, rivers has more flaws but romo's mental laspes knock him down
The realist keepin it real amongst the surrealists
R.I.P. Big Homey Nate Dogg: "Cuz Iiiiiiiiii have ne-evv-ver met a giiiiiiiiiirrrrrrllllllllllllllllllll tha-at I loved in the whole wide wooorrrlllllddddddd"
by starbury_to_s-jaxci2000 on Oct 18, 2011 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions
Good god
that is the greatest thing i have heard all day. I am now a fan of who ever is playing the chargers. Great idea ScarletO. You get a rec!
We're here to win football games. The way to do that is to tell him and to get on him at the right times. I do that when you guys (media) don't see and watch.''
What else makes a strong leader?
"You win,'' Romo said. "You're a very good leader once you win.
"That's' what we're going to do.''
by TARHEEL PAUL on Oct 17, 2011 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions
I know how Jimmy would have played it
He would have gone for the win. Not bent over and asked………. Man if you don’t have the guts to try and win. Then you are a looser and an idiot.
by cowboy north on Oct 17, 2011 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions
And yet..
Dallas could and should have won this game. The OL is a liability with it’s youth and conditioning but if 23 doesn’t put the ball on the ground and Austin doesn’t forget to catch before turning to run, I think we win 22-20. Yes, I know, supposition, but I think we are 3-4 plays per game of being a 5-0 or 4-1 team. 23 blocking errors dovetails nicely with one of my favorite ‘goats’ but this OLine is only going to improve. As much as I felt like throwing my control through the TV (which would have inevitablity led to a divorce) I believe we win the NFC East, this year!
It starts with winning the next 3.
" Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. "
Samuel Beckett
I see a pattern
In order to compensate for the offensive line’s short comings we’re using alot of 2 tight end sets, but eventually teams will catch up to us. The Yuglies better step up their game.
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
I want to see how Garrett emphasizes the execution in the future.
Garrett made a big difference last season in the intensity level and the level of execution by the players. I wonder if Garrett will now bear down and make life difficult and be really demanding.
I would love for someone to ask him at the press conference, but I doubt any of the “reporters” will think of something so basic.
The question: "Coach, how do you feel about the execution of your team?"
Coach: “I am all for it!”
Rich McKay, former Tampa Bay head coach.
by ScarletO on Oct 17, 2011 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
How long
Does this team respond to Garrett “making life difficult etc”. when he is the biggest problem. Ryan will get a head coaching job next year and where does that leave this team.
by cowboy north on Oct 17, 2011 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions
John McKay
but it is still one of the funniest lines ever uttered by a HC. I remember seeing that and he was so absolutely deadpan that you had to wonder just how serious he was.
by burmafrd1944 on Oct 17, 2011 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't get what was said before Garrett said that he would go back and look at the tape
it seems like the same question he gets all the time… questioning his playcalling and everyone else’s play, including Romo.
I don’t think he took the ball out of Romo’s hands at the end of the game, Romo had a chance to go up by 7 and didn’t do it. He was trying to run out the clock, all they needed was 1 first down.
and they had zero chance of getting that first down running into Wilfork's belly 3 times....
hey – we lost…at least we mixed it up a little this time
Tony oh-no.....
JG presser at 4:30, I'm sure we'll get all the answers.
TCU is going to the Big 12, about time.................................Lock n Load
KD,
here’s a key statistic.
look at success rate for 1st down runs / 1 down passes. I got
-1st down runs: 16.6% SR
-1st down pass: 57% SR (plus huge yardage on top of success)
For God and country - Geronimo
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Oct 17, 2011 4:23 PM CDT reply actions
I think in the vacuum of the game, that lends definite credence to the thought process that a high percentage pass would have been the way to go, but clearly there was confidence in the defense and concern over Romo’s previous bad decision/execution this season.
It’s a catch 22 for JG, IMO. He gambled trying to eliminate the chance of failure for the quarterback that had been bailing out in the face of the rush for most of the game. I remember at least 8-10 passes where Romo did that. Not inspiring for a play caller.
| Blogging The Boys | SBNation Dallas | Producer/CoHost Flood The Block Radio, TUE 7p RockTheFlow.com |
Follow @KDP10For10 | Follow@BloggingTheBoys
Time outs
JG got Belichek to use 2 time outs during that short three and out. A first down on the ground probably wins the game.
I only show up to mock other posters, jeer at the writing here, and make strange complaints about internet culture.
They got the ball with 2 and a half minutes left and one timeout if I remember right
they started at their own 20. If our defense wasn’t swiss cheese that drive, NE would’ve had difficult getting a td. They managed to consistently get 8-15 yards AND out of bounds. They pretty much took their time in the red zone with little pressure.
While I understand the criticism, I think Garrett made the right decision. A turnover there (and Romo came close a couple times the previous drive, ie the pass to Ogletree with the safety literally on top of him), and I’m not sure this team recovers.
Also, I think the massive losses running the ball forced his hand on 2nd and 3rd down a little. If it was 2nd/3rd and reasonable, we may’ve seen playaction or any number of plays. But playaction on 2nd and 13 isn’t gonna get you much, and we couldn’t risk an incompletion with a 1st down being unlikely.
after that first pick in the first series
i wouldnt have had much faith in tony either. but that last 3 and out. you know the o-line cant get a push. the patriots are putting 9 in the box. a screen, quick slant/drag to miles or dez who are one on one, play action, or even something crazy like a naked bootleg option(with choice going in the counter dircetion, murray running with romo) with witten rolling out just in case the pats close in too quick
The realist keepin it real amongst the surrealists
R.I.P. Big Homey Nate Dogg: "Cuz Iiiiiiiiii have ne-evv-ver met a giiiiiiiiiirrrrrrllllllllllllllllllll tha-at I loved in the whole wide wooorrrlllllddddddd"
by starbury_to_s-jaxci2000 on Oct 17, 2011 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions
You're not getting it
Garrett caused the Patriots to burn two time outs. He got the clock near two minutes to go.
A first down on the ground by the Cowboys likely wins the game.
A stop by Ryan’s defense likely wins the game.
I only show up to mock other posters, jeer at the writing here, and make strange complaints about internet culture.
the cowboys got next to no yards on the ground
what dont you get. all you need is a first down. there is no difference in giving brady 2 minutes or 3 minutes. now if they woulda gave him 4 or more than dallas would likely have gotten another shot
patriots were packing the box and LOS. one slant coulda gave them 5 yards or more and essentially iced the game but no he elects to get stuffed twice before 3rd down
The realist keepin it real amongst the surrealists
R.I.P. Big Homey Nate Dogg: "Cuz Iiiiiiiiii have ne-evv-ver met a giiiiiiiiiirrrrrrllllllllllllllllllll tha-at I loved in the whole wide wooorrrlllllddddddd"
by starbury_to_s-jaxci2000 on Oct 18, 2011 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions
What happened to all the screen plays they talked about in Minicamp
With the ball and 3:30 to go, a screen play would have been perfect. Low risk pass with the potential of a 4 to 5 yard reward. The way Murray made a few guys miss earlier in the game, he could have at least got positive yardage. I don’t get the point of getting more athletic on the OLine and not using it to your advantage.
As a last resort, put Spears, Ratliff and Brent on the line with the other five linemen, put RBs in the backfield and pick a side to run to. A good coach gets creative.
We had two weeks to prepare for the Patriots and yet, we still have costly penalties. What is really going on in practice?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
by thegloryyears on Oct 18, 2011 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Quite please, the JG presser is starting.
TCU is going to the Big 12, about time.................................Lock n Load
Amazing that we kept Welker under 50 yards and still lots...
Amazing that Brady spent every other down being hit, hurried or sacked, and probably can’t get out of bed this morning, and we’re complaining about our offense… this game should tell the league that this team can be shut down in the 2nd half, can turn the ball over.
We lost to a better team. Not happy with Romo, put in McGee already…
according to a current fanpost...
today is a good day to call out our secondary!! next time i see such a foolish article written, i’ll just look up the author and not waste my time commenting. OOPS!
REC
Great work again, KD.
Shocking to see that it was so bad. I mean we knew it was bad , but …
Must have taken considerable time to do this. Thanks.
So the conclusion is...
O-Line stinks. And what does the future hold? Nothing good I’m afraid. The OC who is already questionable at best
(all games considered) now must come up with an effective offensive stategy knowing he has a weak O-Line. For the rest of the year. Can it be done? Sure. But there is no room for penalties or TO’s, even more so than usual. And the penalties are on the Coach, always are. (remember Wade).
" Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. "
Samuel Beckett
the team came into this game sleeping..
Romo as usually played a roller coster game..I saw Romo eyeing down WR’s just plain out ignoring Dez.. what happen to Robinson? A few games ago Romo was trying to feed this guy all day .. the fact is Romo throws the ball, check out of plays, and etc..
Sometimes u gotta ask Romo what are u seeing? What are u doing?
by lostar2009 on Oct 17, 2011 5:05 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
kickass work
thanks for analysis.
I only show up to mock other posters, jeer at the writing here, and make strange complaints about internet culture.
Garret needs to Free the Romo
Tony is the teams best offensive weapon.
by playactionman on Oct 17, 2011 5:21 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
he tried the first series
and he floated a terrible pass right to the patriots. guess you cant teach old dogs new tricks. tony will always be an explosive yet frequently mistake-prone QB
The realist keepin it real amongst the surrealists
R.I.P. Big Homey Nate Dogg: "Cuz Iiiiiiiiii have ne-evv-ver met a giiiiiiiiiirrrrrrllllllllllllllllllll tha-at I loved in the whole wide wooorrrlllllddddddd"
by starbury_to_s-jaxci2000 on Oct 18, 2011 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions
while a persuasive article,
It doesnt take into account the play call putting the cowboys players in a bad spot. A team has to play to it’s strengths, or more mistakes than usual will be made. While alot of the mistakes are on the players and more specifically, the O line, a good portion are also on Garrett putting the players in a bad situation, where mistakes are likely.
In '08,"I want Dez! I want Dez!" In '10,"WE DRAFTD DEZ!!! WE DRAFTED DEZ!!! HOLY S#!* WE GOT DEZ!"
by codydoser on Oct 17, 2011 5:26 PM CDT via iPhone app reply actions
you'll need to give examples
of Garrett’s playcalling that put this team in a bad spot.
| Blogging The Boys | SBNation Dallas | Producer/CoHost Flood The Block Radio, TUE 7p RockTheFlow.com |
Follow @KDP10For10 | Follow@BloggingTheBoys
Terrific work KD. Love the way you did this.
If we don’t win the game of the trenches we don’t win the game. Looks like JG is in a similar spot as last year, needing to tailor the game plan around a deficient(albeit younger, learning) OLine. And maybe he did.
I will also chime in what I have seen others saying in varying places, namely that we were not targeting our playmakers in the redzone in the 2nd half. Tashard & MartyB are not really who I expect to be counted on to the exclusion of Miles, Dez, & JW.
Also throwing the ball short of the goal line instead of targeting receivers actually in the endzone, seemed to be a pattern. Don’t know if that was game-plan, or play-calling to keep pocket time down, or what.
"You have to play this game like somebody just hit your mother with a 2x4." -- Dan Birdwell, Oakland Raiders
RR1 = RedRocket / RR2 = RobRyan
RR3 = Ready for Retirement(JerryJones) / rr = rabblerouser
I don't have a problem with JG leading this team as a head coach
But there are so many things for him to worry about while preparing this team every week (penalties, etc.) that I think he is stretching himself a bit thin having the extra duty of running the offense as well. I wish he would give somebody else the keys to the offense so that he can put all his focus on giving the players a kick in the pants and preparing them for whoever we face that week.
by me gusta on Oct 17, 2011 5:41 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Yep
Garrett is a good HC. Needs to let someone else figure out how to use these weapons on O. We’ve got lots of talent, but I’m not seeing any creativity in the plays. I see so many other games where I think, wow, that play would work against anybody. When we get one of those, we never see it again the rest of the game.
by Silverblue on Oct 17, 2011 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think Garrett's problem this
week was what happened two weeks ago. Romo doesn’t turn into Tony Oh no, and they probably would have been more aggressive, but he did turn into Oh no, so this week, no matter who the oppponent was, if they got the lead he was going to be conservative in his play calling.
I have questions.
First, watching without the benefit of repeated viewings, it looked to me like Romo had a pretty solid, if unspectacular game. You seem to be saying that he was awful (correct me if I’m wrong). I guess my first question is, is the constant throwing off the back foot new? Yes, I know he sometimes does it, but then, so did Brady when our D was in his face. I know he had an injection for the pain; is he simply not healthy enough to take the punishment and be effective? If not, I’m not sure Garrett is doing him any favors by playing him, leaving him to the mercy of that O line, and then taking the ball out of his hands at a crucial time.
Second, two people who were at the game assert that Romo’s pick was on Dez, that Dez simply stopped his route. Did you see any evidence of that? What do you think about the way Dez seems to disappear for large chunks of the game? One of the people who was at the game says he ran awful routes.
All of that said, I’m not willing to jump all over Garrett either. Obviously, there were a lot of problems yesterday, and it’s not on him that there were multiple penalties, dropped passes, poor blocking, etc. But I do want to understand the fourth quarter better. I’m having a hard time believing that we supposed to spend another week putting this loss on Romo.
Hey Fernie
not saying Romo was awful at all. I think he is still suffering from the ribs and is playing a little gun shy. When the line gave him a clean pocket, he stepped into his throws for the most part, but any time that it wasn’t 409-worthy, he seemed to bail on the throw.
The interception seeemed to me a crossing of several bad things. The line allowed pressure, Romo falling away from the throw, two receivers at a relative depth to each other in the same zone, and possibly Dez not completing his route properly.
The thing is, Romo knows his line sucks. Garrett knows it as well. They’ve had flashes and stretches of being able to play well and even impressively. Most of the Detroit game, for example. But everything Garrett and Romo is doing, assertively and cautiously, stems from compensating for the line. Of course, these are just my opinions, and I welcome any dissenting views.
| Blogging The Boys | SBNation Dallas | Producer/CoHost Flood The Block Radio, TUE 7p RockTheFlow.com |
Follow @KDP10For10 | Follow@BloggingTheBoys
Heya, KD. I have to keep reminding myself that I was all for revamping the line and that
problems were to be expected. Yesterday, I assumed that Garrett called those running plays because the line wasn’t protecting Romo, because Romo was still ailing, and because he was willing to let the D, which had been good, try to ice the game. I don’t feel like faulting him for that. Great post, and thanks for the reply.
All of this bashing an now Garrett bashing...
was he not the OC for 13-3?
by Dosresolvedalotofignorantviews on Oct 17, 2011 9:01 PM CDT reply actions
Yes he was
Garrett has absolutely no confidence in Romo. Two weeks ago he is up big and Romo chokes.
You think he is going to trust him late in the game. No way! Garrett trusts the defense more that he trusts Romo.
The RHG has a master plan.
Romo will make it easy for Garrett to say he needs a new qb.
The OC calls the plays and the QB is suppose to execute them. Romo cannot execute the plays Garrett calls and Garrett knows it.
Give him 2 years and we will be in the championship game.
by oneforthethumb on Oct 17, 2011 9:24 PM CDT up reply actions
With a new QB?
" Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. "
Samuel Beckett
You're a mind reader, huh?
I found this article OCC posted in the fanshots interesting:
http://www.foxsportssouthwest.com/10/17/11/Cowboys-fans-should-be-encouraged-by-New/landing_cowboys.html?blockID=583776&feedID=3742
And yes Fernie I agree it is
TEAM,TEAM, TEAM.
by Dosresolvedalotofignorantviews on Oct 17, 2011 9:07 PM CDT reply actions
I think
JG was possibly too cautious early on with Romo. A general game plan could be – throw early, then run late when the pressure’s on. Of course I can see why he didn’t do this – Romo injury, early pick.
To use a pitching analogy
You have 4 types of plays in football (tons of formations but 4 types). They are by zones, at the Line of Scrimmage, 3 to 6 yards, 10 to bomb yards and then either behind the O-line or split out wide. So in pitching you keep the batter off guard by location (the runs through the LoS behind the Oline, or the width of the field in bubble screen types of plays) and by speed/change up.
If you have a strong & dominant Oline then you can stick to standard running and short passing because you gain the necessary yardage to move the sticks and punch it into the endzone. If not then you Need to utilize the whole field both width-wise and length-wise and do it with the same tenacity that a defense wants to use to disrupt a Qb. Don’t let the defense get settled into run or pass because that gives them the freedom of either playing the LoS or of dropping back into their lanes (which are both vertical decisions).
Like a pitcher we need to consistently use the inside and outside of the plate, the left and right sidelines…then add a variety of depths to keep the defense left, right, up, back, long and short. That frustrates the D-line and backers, the cornerbacks and safeties.
we seem to only utilize quick routes in certain, predictable situations which of course makes it harder to complete. We have to be surgical about our field attack and play calling & design!
JG wants to use the baseball analogy so he should fully utilize it. It would make our offense as unpredictable as our defense, and as aggressive!

by 























