Cowboys @ Patriots Aftermath: It's Starting To Look A Lot Like 2009
In a post after the 49ers game, I noted that this season, with its incessant litany of close games, was starting to feel a lot like the 2005 campaign, which was packed with nail-biters that went down to the wire (and, as might be predicted, turned on a single play or untoward miscue). I'm revising that opinion, however. After Sunday's tilt, this season is looking a lot more like 2009. That season, you may recall, was--like 2005--an up and down year. The highs tended to feature the Cowboys overcoming or avoiding offensive "drive killers": penalties, sacks, and failed third down conversions ; the lows featured these, plus untimely turnovers.
When the 2009 Dallas offense was functioning, the running game operated in high gear. Remember the impressive run totals amassed at home against the Giants, Panthers and Raiders. The most curious aspect of this was the running game's Jekyll-and-Hyde nature. In some games, I had to blink, because I thought I saw Nate Newton and Eric Williams plowing huge running lanes for Emmitt Smith; in others, I swore that I saw Tyson Walter failing to open up a hole as Michael Wiley was stopped for no gain. When the Cowboys struggled to tote the rock (in dismal efforts at Denver and Green Bay and short yardage struggles against San Diego and Washington, for example), the entire team appeared to sag.
One of the fascinating aspects of the 2009 running attack was that its feeblest efforts seemed to happen against quicker, more mobile fronts; 3-4 teams gave the 2009 Cowboys fits. The pure speed of the pass rushing OLB-types off the edge, or complex line games requiring quick feet and mental dexterity exposed Dallas' slower linemen. Where they tended to play better was against bigger front sevens--typically 4-3 defenses with run-plugging DTs (the great exception being the playoff game against Minnesota).
More...
The inability of Marc Columbo, Andre Gurode and Leonard Davis to deal with quickness forced Dallas to overhaul the unit last offseason, collecting lighter-bodied athletes, who rely primarily on foot-speed and smarts to do their work. As a result, the types of defensive fronts against whom they struggle and succeed has been reversed. The revamped Dallas O-line has acquitted itself well against lines that rely on quickness more than brute force, but the big blobs who were ponderous enough that the lead-footed Davis could engage them--and therefore push them around--are, to Bill Nagy and Phil Costa, immovable objects.
And New England has collected some of the blobbiest of defensive linemen. Check out this rare collection of run-plugging widebodies. Vince Wilfork: 6'2", 325 lbs; Gerrard Warren: 6'4", 330; Albert Haynesworth: 6'6", 350, and the Olive Oyl of the bunch, Kyle Love: 6'1", 310. On Sunday, the Cowboys' interior linemen struggled mightily to move these guys off the line of scrimmage. Even in the late second and third quarters, when the Dallas offense was moving the ball with comparative ease, the Cowboys' linemen got no inside push whatsoever; the line of scrimmage remained exactly where the ball had been snapped.
When the line of scrimmage isn't moving, it doesn't take much to disrupt a running play; only one guy has to miss an assignment--or, for this group, get manhandled--and the good work of the rest of the unit goes unrewarded. Against the Patriots, therefore, the margin of error was wafer-thin. And, as might be expected, drive after drive stalled because a single Cowboys lineman was beaten while his mates failed to establish a new line of scrimmage. This was particularly true early in the game. Some examples:
First drive:
-on second and six, the Cowboys elect to run off of left tackle. Most of the linemen make terrific blocks; however, Costa is pushed into the backfield, Doug Free gives ground, and it pushed into Felix Jones' path. The play results in positive yardage only because Jones breaks two tackles in the backfield.
-on third and three, the Cowboys do a decent job picking up a double "A-gap" blitz, but Andre Carter beats Tyron Smith around the corner, causing Romo to throw flat-footed. The result? His fourth interception in eight drives. Drive over.
Second drive:
-on second and three, Dallas calls another run, and three of the linemen execute their blocks, with Costa making an especially nice second-level block. But Bill Nagy is blown up, and Kosier allows his man to gain inside penetration. Jones is wrapped up almost immediately after receiving the handoff. Loss of one.
-three plays later, on a second and eight, Romo audibles into a run play. At the snap, Wilfork drives Free back into the path of the pulling Kosier, who bounces off Wilfork and blocks no one. DeMarco Murray falls forward for one yard. To add insult to injury, Free is called for holding, and the Cowboys cannot recover. Drive over.
Third drive:
-the Cowboys immediately get the ball back and, on the third play, Romo throws to Robinson in the end zone, drawing an interference penalty. But Kosier hasn't gained leverage on Warren and, when Romo rolls away from pressure, has to hold him. Instead of first and goal, we have offsetting penalties.
-two plays later, after a false start on Free, the Cowboys have a third and fourteen, and call a draw play to Choice. The play is well blocked--again, several linemen have engaged second level defenders--except Warren destroys Nagy, blowing up the play for a three yard loss. Cowboys kick a field goal.
Fourth drive:
-on the first play after a fumbled kickoff, Dallas again elects to run. They fail to establish a new line of scrimmage, and Love gets low on Kosier, driving him back into Jones, who has just received the handoff. Jones remains on his feet and takes the play outside, gaining a single yard.
-later in the drive, on second and ten ad the Pats 21, another run is called. Wilfork (an all-too familir name) drives Costa to the right side of the line, into the play, and into the ballcarrier, Choice, who fumbles. Drive over--and key turnover wasted.
From this point in the game (roughly the end of the first quarter) on, the Cowboys line did a much better job of maintaining the line of scrimmage. The next drive ended on the kind of play that used to stymie the '09 line: Kosier failed to pick up a stunt, and Romo had to hurry his throw, forcing a punt. After that, the Cowboys' next three drives were relatively mistake free. On the next drive, Wilfork destroyed Costa, but the play rolled the other direction, so it wasn't negatively impacted. Subsequent drives featured plays in which Smith, Costa, or Nagy were beaten, but the key was that each of these drives featured only one of these plays.
Then, on Dallas final actual drive, after the defense had forced Tom Brady and Co. into a three-and-out, two such plays instantly killed any chances for the drive to succeed. We know the story all too well; Dallas' choice to run the ball, and failure to gain any positive yardage doing so, has already been discussed ad nauseum. As with the game's early drives, a Brandon Spikes "A-gap" blitz blew up otherwise decently-blocked plays' chances for success: on the first, Costa was driven into the backfield; on the next, Kosier couldn't handle Spikes, who spun into the hole, causing Murray to bounce the play outside, into the waiting arms of several Pats defenders.
As the Cowboys demonstrated in '09, they can overcome one "drive killer," but rarely two, and never three. That line specialized in mental mistakes that resulted in penalties and sacks. This one appears to make few mental errors, but can be counted on to be beaten physically several times a game (and notice that there's not a single starter who didn't get beat physically on Sunday). Either way--and once again--a Cowboys team that is playing well in almost every other respect (and, yes, I realize that the quarterback can be mercurial) is hampered by the inconsistency of its line play.
And I had hoped, perhaps naively, that with the offseason O-line overhaul those days were behind us...
74 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We are all optimistic about next year
after a year of seasoning with these young guys, and an off-season of conditioning with Mike Woicik. This is universally agreed.
But, what do we do THIS year? Now, we all just complain that the line can’t block, running backs can’t run, passer can’t pass, and wide receivers don’t stretch the field and make big plays downfield.
We complain about Romo not making plays to his fourth or fifth read, and we criticize play calling, both for being dumbed-down and for not aggressively attacking defenses.
Great analysis of the problem, but what are solutions?
Cowboys and Longhorns - getting up off the turf to win another day.
Spurs? It's football season!
You won't like the answer.
I think they must do exactly what they are doing. If you can’t run nor throw deep, you challenge the middle. The defense knows that, and will protect it. That is why, Romo always appears to be throwing in traffic, in small windows, to well covered guys.
It is not a deathwish. Unless the running game starts producing, or the OL starts passprotecting, that is the best strategy.
Of course, Garrett could try some trickery, like reverses, double reverses, and all those calls that fans atributed to a need to show off. But even those, are rarely working any more, now that our OL is completely exposed. Perhaps we should let Bryant field punts hoping for shorter fields? (that’s sarcasm, not against the call which might be legitimate, but against fans who think that we have an abundance of alternative calls in the playbook)
The weaker schedule might also help, but against quality opponents, expect Romo to continue taking risks, and live or die on every play.
by Fsanchezf1983 on Oct 19, 2011 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions
This is what I see the other teams doing too. Stuffing the run, shut off the long passes with a safety
And let Romo/Garrett pck at the middle, waiting for a mistake.
If the OL doesn’t get better nothing will work anyways. It’s the key to the whole house of cards in the NFL.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, the real question is, is it a good beer? Realist Larry, 2011
by Realist Larry on Oct 20, 2011 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions
Every time...
…I look at this squad, it’s strengths, shortcomings, personnel, broad offensive philosophy, the works, I get taken back to a Time when our own beloved Landry’s game was becoming somewhat dated. When 2 other innovators held sway in many a gameday. With one having similar W/L difficulties, though more from lacking what we’ve fortunately found on D.
And every time I hint at it, come out and say it, there’s nary a peep why or why not in terms of it being, in part, whole, right, wrong or pure foolishness, a solution, a thing to consider, relative to this team.
When I’d watch those squads, their game (meaning both the plan and the execution), I figured if anybody ever married them, melded them, put them together with a deadly D, they’d have taken dead-aim at W’s.
Maybe I’m not working the problem challenge. Not seeing the QB’s capabilities, pocket and scrambling. Not seeing the backs, their dual-threat (if properly utilized). The line, built to agility, not size. The receivers, inside, outside, vertically, crossing. Not seeing each of their respective strengths, their flaws. Don’t hamstring the guys, use the tools. Use all the tools.
Jeez, people keep talking Air Garrett, doing a homage to Coryell. Fine, all for it. Love it. Marry a bit of Walsh in there, with this squad, doesn’t it address the aspects of the O that need some tuning, tweaking?
I maintain, GCW.
Even to Garrett Can Win. Though without some W, that “can” might slip to “can’t”. And it won’t be because of “can’t”, but of “won’t”. And in more than a season’s sense. In a career’s.
Cry 'Havoc!'
by tanstaafl on Oct 19, 2011 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Well that's what happens when you try to rebuild the line in one draft.
Jerry should have spent a few premium picks on o linemen instead of just linebackers. It all goes back to Jerry not understanding how to build a team. Very rarely is that a 299lbs guard like Nagy is succesful. We are too lite in the middle.
but what are solutions
Maybe you see Holland get plugged in for Kosier or Nagy. There aren’t many options short of waiting for next years draft. You can’t keep neglecting a certain position in the draft and think you will fix it in one draft.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
Someone else said it in another post
But i think now you move Kosier back to the left with Free.I think this helps Free a ton.He is comfortable and more secure with Kosier.Holland to RG and I am not sure you do not start Kowalski.Seems to have done great at C when put in.I think instantaneously helps the run game.As we all know when the running game starts to work,everything else opens up.If we do this,I believe alot of our problems become not as big.
I agree with your, unless Kosier is hurt and then both he and Free would be dinged
Because, while I have not heard differently, a couple of weeks back Free was getting beat and they said it was because he was having back problems.
It is one of those, fix one thing and another area flares up.
by LiveNDieBlue on Oct 19, 2011 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions
nice post full of sunshine ... sigh
good observations tho. but i can’t help but being depressed at how right you are….we get manhandled constantly. my biggest pet peeve used to be our secondary couldn’t cover a toilet seat inna bathroom stall. now it’s our lineman getting thrown around like ragdolls.
double sigh….
"They need security in the world, Craig!"
My opinion on the loine is complex
Injuries are playing a part, it is now reported Kosier is playing with the dreaded plantar fisciatis, Nagy was playing with a strained neck, I saw Free get hurt and saw him limp through week one, he never made the injury report so who knows, Colombo couldn’t bend his knee and was not on the injury report last year.
Dallas is not alone, the entire league through week one was a whole yard per carry off pace, this is significant. A few teams with veteran lines are running well but the trend is most teams have failed at running the ball,
No one thought we would be a good offensive line early, what we wanted to see is improvement.
Oh gawd
I hate plantar fisciatis… I have had it myself for three weeks now and it doesn’t look like it is letting up.
MacGruber!
foot help suggestion
I’ve had plantar fasciatis several times and it is a pain! Try this, it was recommended to me and when I finally tried it it really helped. Don’t just ice it, take a plastic water bottle and fill it almost full (allow for freeze expansion) then freeze it. Then take the frozen bottle set it on a towel on the floor and roll your heel back and forth over it. It ices the area and massages it and, while I tried all sorts of other things (like buying insoles and even cutting circles out in them for my heel to sit in), this worked.
by LiveNDieBlue on Oct 19, 2011 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions
I know I'm butting in, but one more suggestion about the 'dreaded plantar fasciatis'
I’m sure you’ve already been told, but this suggestion was an incredible help: Put a pencil on the floor and keep picking it up with your toes over and over. It was the key thing I added that helped to finally get rid of it.
Keep the faith!
Had this a few years ago.
I iced it and stretched it (still do) with a belt or up and down on a step. The heeling process took forever. I finally got a shot that hurt like hell but I instantly felt better. I couldn’t believe a needle could go into my heel like that.
by staubachfan on Oct 19, 2011 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions
Forgot about the belt (I used a towel)
and I bought those unattractive, but effective, shoes (Merrills) that really fit your feet. I had to ditch the flip-flops and cute shoes for a while but it healed before I needed the shot (thank God).
Keep the faith!
I took that shot also. My PF is chronic, but no longer acute.
When the doc took a very firm grip on my leg & said, “Try not to thrash around too much,” I knew I was in trouble.
Funny thing is, for as bad as the shot hurt, the relief it gave was worth it. And like Marima says below, Merrill’s are the best shoes i found to help.
"You have to play this game like somebody just hit your mother with a 2x4." -- Dan Birdwell, Oakland Raiders
RR1 = RedRocket / RR2 = RobRyan
RR3 = Ready for Retirement(JerryJones) / rr = rabblerouser
It took me 4-5 weeks after starting steroids to quit hurting so bad.
Get the socks from a place like FootsSmart.com that has the elastic band in the middle to support your arch, that has helped me. And always wear good shoes with gel insoles according to my DR.
I seriously think it would take Costa close to a full minute to beat me in arm wrestling.
I’d say he needs to hit the iron, but from what I read, work ethic isn’t a problem with him.
More likely that he simply is not a starting-caliber NFL center. Not one you should plan on winning with anyway.
UDFAs are exactly that for a reason.
Someone—Jerry, JG, probably both—grossly overrates what Houck can do with these lesser talents.
Speaking of which….anyone else find the new prototype for a Dallas OL to be a peculiar match with Houck’s style?
Kowalski is better than Costa imo. He has a nastier demeanor.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Oct 19, 2011 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions
I can.
Not really but it made me feel good to say it.
We're here to win football games. The way to do that is to tell him and to get on him at the right times. I do that when you guys (media) don't see and watch.''
What else makes a strong leader?
"You win,'' Romo said. "You're a very good leader once you win.
"That's' what we're going to do.''
by TARHEEL PAUL on Oct 19, 2011 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions
in 3 sets yeah
The realist keepin it real amongst the surrealists
R.I.P. Big Homey Nate Dogg: "Cuz Iiiiiiiiii have ne-evv-ver met a giiiiiiiiiirrrrrrllllllllllllllllllll tha-at I loved in the whole wide wooorrrlllllddddddd"
by starbury_to_s-jaxci2000 on Oct 19, 2011 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions
2009 ended with 11-5 record East champs and a playoff win
so I agree wholeheartedly.
In Romo we Trust
At this point i would be thrilled with that. Maybe an extra playoff win too.
We're here to win football games. The way to do that is to tell him and to get on him at the right times. I do that when you guys (media) don't see and watch.''
What else makes a strong leader?
"You win,'' Romo said. "You're a very good leader once you win.
"That's' what we're going to do.''
by TARHEEL PAUL on Oct 19, 2011 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Yep and i only see one team in the NFC that is flat out better than us.......
that being the Packers of course.
We're here to win football games. The way to do that is to tell him and to get on him at the right times. I do that when you guys (media) don't see and watch.''
What else makes a strong leader?
"You win,'' Romo said. "You're a very good leader once you win.
"That's' what we're going to do.''
by TARHEEL PAUL on Oct 19, 2011 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions
The Pack have the easiest schedule ever other than the Steelers every year.
by TheCowboyFan on Oct 19, 2011 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions
If we want to go to the SB this year
We’ll have to win in frigid conditions in Green Bay in January but luckily our franchise qb is from Wisconsin and used to that type of weather.
In Romo we Trust
I have no doubt that they can beat the Pack anywhere...
plus that beating they took last year is fresh in their memory. Payback! I think by the end of the season if the offensive line is straighten out, the Cowboys will be a force!
by TheCowboyFan on Oct 19, 2011 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions
Agreed
The team is going through some growing pains; have held their own against the best teams in the league; and the defense will only get better.
"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach
I have no doubt that this team can beat any team in the league.
The problem is, I have no doubt that this team can lose to any team in the league.
Is there no aspect of Tony Romo that is anything less than perfect?
Lifelong Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/
SB XLIV: Saints 31 Colts 17
Nary a Cowboys in sight. 3 back, in fact. With a 34-3 whuppin’ sendin’ ’em home with their tail between their legs, despite the 3-peat on them silly birds. Remember the feeling, the reactions, excuse me, over-reactions, the full result of the season? Sooo… – I disagree wholeheartedly.
Next.
Cry 'Havoc!'
It's all about each persons own expectations.
I don’t expect us to win the super bowl this year so it would be hard for me to be upset with 11 wins and a playoff victory.
We're here to win football games. The way to do that is to tell him and to get on him at the right times. I do that when you guys (media) don't see and watch.''
What else makes a strong leader?
"You win,'' Romo said. "You're a very good leader once you win.
"That's' what we're going to do.''
by TARHEEL PAUL on Oct 19, 2011 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions
I expect no more of a person or group of 'em than they are capable of
Not with respect to this team, individually or collectively. Nor any other beyond football. This “Once you get to the dance anything can happen” sounds a bit too trite, a bit too entitledly expectant for my liking. Never saddle your players with the burden, the unnecessary and misguided weight, of such nonsense. More properly, “Once you get to the dance you can make anything happen”. Depends on what you’re willing to sacrifice for the opportunity, for the team, for yourself. ’Cuz this might be your one shot. Wanna miss?
What was the Cowboys playoff result in 1979? In 1991? 11-5’s there. ‘83 more W’s. Same result. ‘92? More W’s, different result. ‘78, more W’s, different result than ’92.
One-and-done’s annoy me, unless it’s us sendin’ them home. Same with 2’s, even 3’s, unless the 3’s being done with the bye and a W in the 3rd. Lock me in for four game winning-streaks the last 4 games of the season. Remember, a season includes playoffs. Just ‘cuz a team didn’t finish out the season doesn’t mean it’s not there. There’s one mean-a$$ pile of hard work struggling against Adversity, or is that adversaries(?), for them 4 W’s.
That’s the season’s reason fore(!) my expectation at this point of any season.
Cry 'Havoc!'
I can't stand the sentiment
“Just get in anything can happen.” That reminds me of the Bill Parcells philosophy of playing not to lose which dominated/dominates the NFL coaching ranks.
Destiny is created by the team who wants it more than the other. That team will take what’s theirs because they’re tired of losing, or because they never want to remember what it felt like to lose. Because losing, and underachieving becomes a habit that’s hard to break.
My favorite of all-time, the 1995 Dallas Cowboys. They may have played with fire that season, with bone headed coaching and bone headed execution to starting to creep in on gamedays. However, the players took it upon themselves to win. Who were they playing for?Their football family. As Moose Johnston said in the 1995 America’s Game, that team won despite their coaches.
We’ve all beaten down the ineptitude of the coaching and playcalling to a dead horse. I’m convinced, if this team really is like the 2009 team, they’ll rally around each other like they did that one afternoon in Kansas City, where each player on offense and defense decided to draw a line in the ground that the Cowboys weren’t going to lose to the lowly Chiefs.
That win sparked an 8-3 finish to the regular season and saw the Cowboys first playoff win in 13 years. That run came crashing to halt in Minnesota, puttinf the team in a funk of doubt that carried through out the first 8 weeks of last year when the team went 1-7, and which the team had to battle against in their 5-3 close to the season.
However, once again, the team finds itself at that season cross road of doubt creeping in as to whether or not they can get this done. It’s time for this team to rally around one another, and no I’m not talking about Tashard making fake lockerroom ra ra speeches, or Keith Brooking channeling his inner Ray Lewis. No, I’m talking about this team channeling what ever it was that carried them through that Kansas City game and through out the rest of 2009. The band of brothers spirit they showed. They found it at the end of last season. It’s time to locate it and keep a close grip on it.
"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."
by Rohpuri on Oct 19, 2011 2:28 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
11 - 5 (really)?
I do not see that. However, I still believe we win the NFC East and have a chance to make a run in the playoffs.
"Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but what you should have accomplished with your ability."
-John Wooden
I see a 7 - 1 run. Still good enough IMO
by staubachfan on Oct 19, 2011 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions
I would prefer that we continue to discuss the decision to run on 1st and 2nd down
on Dallas’ last drive.
This o-line has the trifecta: stupid penalties, blown assignments, and constantly overpowered. as bad as last year’s o-line was, they at least occasionally got a push.
I agree. Lets continue to beat a dead horse.
We're here to win football games. The way to do that is to tell him and to get on him at the right times. I do that when you guys (media) don't see and watch.''
What else makes a strong leader?
"You win,'' Romo said. "You're a very good leader once you win.
"That's' what we're going to do.''
by TARHEEL PAUL on Oct 19, 2011 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions
Jeezus H, a zombie horse
Screw the rifle, bring a sword. Wonder if it’lll scamper about like a chicken.
Cry 'Havoc!'
Me too!
I want to continue to discuss it. I also want to discuss the inconsistencies in fans’ criticism of not running the previous week.
Oh, and above all else, I want to discuss the fact that no matter what Dallas did on that drive, if it worked, it would have been praised, and if it didn’t, it would have been criticized.
Hindsight is wonderful. I’m going to use it to try and buy some stocks and real estate, and maybe choose some lotto numbers.
Execution executiion execution. Nuff said
When it’s not the playcallin….
I like pasta because my house is made of bricks
And New England has collected some of the blobbiest of defensive linemen. Check out this rare collection of run-plugging widebodies. Vince Wilfork: 6’2", 325 lbs; Gerrard Warren: 6’4", 330; Albert Haynesworth: 6’6", 350, and the Olive Oyl of the bunch, Kyle Love: 6’1", 310.
this is why I was hoping Dallas would really throw the ball around.
For God and country - Geronimo
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Oct 19, 2011 9:56 AM CDT reply actions
makes me wonder why we didn't do a bunch of slants and sluggos (slant and gos) on 3 step drops
instead we have Dez and Miles running to the same area (on that interception)
This team had better put the Rams away early
If they want to have any confidence going forward.
Spags is desperate for a win with this young Rams team that came into the season with so much promise. I think he’s going to pull out all the tricks in the bag. I expect he’ll have is front 7 do stunts and twists to throw off this young oline. Might even have a delayed blitz or two.
He’s going to have to do that to give that horrible secondary a chance against Dez, Miles, and Robinson.
I just hope Dallas comes out slinging. I hate when this offense comes out playing not to lose. Garrett has to give his team confidence and his play calling would go a long way in giving it to them.
"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."
by Rohpuri on Oct 19, 2011 10:34 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
We have to put them away early and make Rams fans feel bad to be Rams fans on Sunday
I’m sorry, we need to start beating down bad teams if we’re gonna prove ourselves as playoff contenders
I like pasta because my house is made of bricks
What they need most ...
… is to win. Period. Why? Because of the points you and others make, and what I believe is true—the Cowboys are the superior team.
If I get to put my own present under the tree, it looks something like this:
A repeat of the first 2.3 quarters of the Lions game, then they show some patience with the run game. Clock and field position management in that situation is essential, but you can’t push a button (can you?). My final 1.7 quarters gives the oline something they can only get one day a week—the opportunity to wear pads and hit like it matters so they can become a cohesive unit.
I’m an optimist. If this week’s present looks like someone re-gifted what they got on Oct 2, I’ll know it’s because next week I’m getting what I’ve always wanted since I was 14—my very own Dallas Cowboys cheerleader.
Go, Cowboys!!
by Lajitas Lava on Oct 19, 2011 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Jimmy wasn't nice. He stepped on the throats of teams. That is what I miss most.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Oct 19, 2011 12:26 PM CDT reply actions
And who assembled that team ? HEH !!
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Oct 20, 2011 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions
Okay, I am sick of our OL being tied to a post and mercilessly whipped all game long every game.
Their ONLY advantage is they can move. They can’t outsmart anyone (not now), They can’t push or drive anyone (too light in the pants). They can’t anchor (same reason). And to add insult to injury, both Tyron and Free are having more trouble dealing with the edge rushers. Free’s protection has really taken a nose dive this year, and Tyron has given up some REALLY inopportune sacks.
Pardon me, but the people that left their pee wee league DL on the field need to come pick them up. They are beating the Cowboys.
Is it just me or have we not seen many plays where the vaunted mobility of this line has been used?
I’m curious about this, not having had the opportunity to watch the games again after, but it seems to me that I expected more plays that utilize the speed and athleticism of the line and haven’t seen any more than last season. Instead the Cowboys seem to mostly plays that are not in tune with the supposed ‘strength’ of the line. Where are the screens and rollouts that keep the line moving and make big fatso D lineman chase after speedy Felix and Murray, or bubble screens to Miles or Dez, even Robinson?
In particular I had hoped to see this kind of play often against the Patriots’ huge D line, but it never really seemed to materialize much. The Cowboys missed an opportunity to really wear them out, especially if you combine this with a no huddle approach. Could have bought some time to take advantage of their weak secondary later.
Am I wrong in thinking this isn’t happening very often? In particular when compared to last season?
by transmogrifier on Oct 19, 2011 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions
Left out a word.
Instead the Cowboys seem to run mostly plays…
by transmogrifier on Oct 19, 2011 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions
screens work against blitzes mostly
they didn’t blitz us much, they just whipped us 4 on 5 with the occasional LB thrown in. It still would have helped if we had gotten some quick hitters like flares and swing routes to hit DeMarco and Felix in space. I would have liked to see more tosses.
But frankly this team was going to suck against that DL no matter what we did. I don’t think we out-anything’d them that game on OL.
Man, I'm falling way behind on my reading...
Great post, great analysis of the O-line struggles. It’s funny though: at the start of the season, when we realized we were going to be starting two rookies – one of them a 7th-rounder – and a first year UDFA, there was a clear expectation that the line was going to struggle.
But now when they do struggle, most pundits seem to be surprised at this. Funny how that goes sometimes.
by One.Cool.Customer on Oct 19, 2011 4:39 PM CDT reply actions
There is a difference between struggling and getting your ass handed to you. (Costa)
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Oct 20, 2011 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions

by 



























