Dallas Cowboys Next Opponent: Video Review Of St Louis Rams
This is a tough one. When I look at video of the last game for the Cowboys' next opponent, I am trying to find things that may be key to the game.
But you don't see a lot that is totally useful when you see a team that is just clearly overmatched. Coming in at 0-5, the St Louis Rams are struggling in all phases. And when they are playing the defending Super Bowl champions, with a quarterback that is establishing himself as one of the best in the league, you get pretty much what you would expect, a 24-3 loss that may not have been as close as the score looks.
I see three possible outcomes for the Cowboys. They could win this game easily, which would be very good and could start Dallas on a strong run with a part of the schedule coming up that is likely easier than the first five games. They could have another meltdown and lose, which would probably mean that the season is going to be a long, sad one. Or they could have a narrow victory, leaving us still wondering just what kind of a team the Cowboys really are.
My reasoning after the jump.
The numbers from the game show some contradictory things. Sam Bradford had a lot of yards passing, but the team was unable to get into the end zone and only managed one field goal on two attempts, although they were going for it on fourth down - and failing - to try and get some touchdowns. The yards also came inefficiently, with Bradford only averaging 7.3 yards per attempt. Steven Jackson, coming back from injury, had a good game, but with the Packers taking a big lead, the Rams got away from the run to try and score. Defensively, the Rams held the Packers scoreless in the second half, but with a three touchdown lead and facing an impotent offense, Green Bay did not need to press for more points.
Watching the game also is a little problematical because some of the things from the game are not totally applicable for the game coming up. The quarterback play on both sides will show what I mean.
When Green Bay had the ball, Aaron Rodgers was able to take what the Rams gave him. When they stayed deep, he carved them up underneath. When they tried to take away the shorter stuff, receivers would get past the safeties, leading to two of the touchdowns, including a 93 yard pass to Jordy Nelson where he just split the two defenders and streaked into the end zone. And Rodgers was able to move around and scramble for yards several times. The Packers only gave up one sack.
Tony Romo is still nursing a broken rib, and it is highly doubtful he will have the mobility that Rodgers was able to use. And the recent problems on the offensive line mean that he will likely have to stick with the quick releases and shorter passes, giving the Cowboys perhaps half the offensive options in the passing game that the Packers used.
When the Rams were on offense, Bradford was at his most effective moving around and when the team played no huddle. But he suffered a high ankle sprain in the game, and it is uncertain who will start at quarterback for St Louis. If they stick with Bradford, he will certainly be less mobile, which could mean that the Dallas defense will be all over him. If they go with A. J. Feeley, who knows? Is he going to be able to go no huddle? It might be even worse with him than with Bradford, or it could turn into another case where a normally ineffective backup comes out and has a career day against Dallas. Given the way the season has gone for the Cowboys, I get a stomachache just thinking about that.
Even more puzzling is the fact that one of the best receivers on the field for the Rams is probably going to be Brandon Lloyd, who just came over from the Denver Broncos. He is essentially an X factor. Will he be as effective as the Rams hope, or will he not be on the same page with his quarterback? Who knows?
The St Louis run game is at least something that Dallas should be able to counter, based on the history of the season so far. But with Jackson having missed time due to injury, that is not certain. Dallas has been very effective stopping the run but Jackson cannot be discounted. He put up 96 yards against Green Bay, a team that ranks fifth in the league defending the run. And when Dallas has the ball, it would seem like an opportunity for them to get their running attack on track, going up against the 29th ranked rush defense in the NFL. But again, it comes back to the offensive line, which has not done very well opening up the holes this year, and Felix Jones is hurt again.
Maybe Dallas has an advantage in special teams, with Josh Brown missing one of his two FG attempts. But they were solid in kick coverage, so that is not definitive.
I don't really know that I learned much from the video this week. I hope we learn something good about the Cowboys Sunday.
75 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If the Cowboys play like they have been all season
they easily blow out the Rams since they clearly aren’t as good as our 5 previous opponents, not even close.
In Romo we Trust
if Romo throws three stupid picks we could just as easily lose
by Musiccitynorm on Oct 21, 2011 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions
If you think Romo is going to throw that many picks every game
you obviously haven’t watched many Cowboys games over the past few years. Those games are the aberration, not the norm.
In Romo we Trust
he's two for five this year
the thing is they are not just picks they are stupid picks,
it is what it is, Romo might throw 5 picks or he might throw 5 touchdowns,
by Musiccitynorm on Oct 21, 2011 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions
not every one
and he’s not two for five, the team is two for five, try to remember that fact. Romo can’t win or lose games all by himself.
In Romo we Trust
Yes Terry not every one but wqay to many are just stupid.
I mean he’s had two games where hes plalyed really really really stupid.
by Musiccitynorm on Oct 21, 2011 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions
what i think
i think ROMO wil have a pretty good day,
i dont think the D can get pressure on tony that often and tony will get that 3.5-4.5 seconds he needs to make the right reads and throws.
its the pressure that kills him. that shouldnt be a big deal this week.
i see dallas having a big game this week and in the next 4 games.
after that depends on how healthy the D is on the teams they face.
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions
pressure kills every qb in the league
Been watching football for over 35 years and have yet to see a qb thrive under pressure.
In Romo we Trust
john elway
he thrived under presure
he was mister comback lol
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions
not true
Elway was effected by pressure just like any other qb….and by pressure I’m not talking about pressure of the situation, I’m talking about DL and LB flying in their face.
In Romo we Trust
yeah depends on what you call pressure
i thought occ did a piece a while back that showed that romo is near the top of the league when facing the blitz
Should be an interesting game
29th ranked rush defense becuz teams get a lead and play conservative knowing they can sit on a lead due to Rams inability to score. Whats their pass defense ranked at?
AJ Feeley can’t be taken lightly if he starts….if he gets hot and we are unable to generate a pass rush due to Ware nursing his back things could get dicey. We need to execute in the redzone and put up TD’s instead of FG’s. Throwing fades to Bryant should be an automatic if he has single coverage on the outside.
We need to show no mercy and start this ball rolling.
Good Luck to the 53. Stand with Honor, Play With Pride. Bring It Home
by TruBluToTheCore on Oct 21, 2011 8:26 AM CDT reply actions
the fade works
One of my biggest beefs with garrett as a playcaller is that he will go away from plays or things that work
Stop being cute dude if it works it works go back to it
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 8:56 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Until the opponent's D stops you
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
+1
Good Luck to the 53. Stand with Honor, Play With Pride. Bring It Home
by TruBluToTheCore on Oct 21, 2011 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions
so
What is the success rate on the fade to Dez? I think its 100thats percent
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:16 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I never really thought Romo was very good at this pass. He throws the ball to flat.
by staubachfan on Oct 21, 2011 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions
And lost the game because of a fumble and an int.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Oct 21, 2011 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions
at times he is good at it.
depense on if he can set his feet. he actually throws that pass better while moving.
and cant get the heat on it . moving forces him to lpoft it more often
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Bygone Days
It seems the days of lining up and running a high percentage play that the other team knows is coming,and daring them to stop it ,is long over, with play books that have hundreds of plays to choose from , it seems that couches are determined to try and call them all. to disguise the plays and mix up defenses. no wounder the offense is just as mixed up as the D.
i miss the old days of here i am and this is what im doing , so stop me if you can.
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions
if i have baby randy moss or baby andre johnson aka dez bryant
I am running flys and fades all day
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:23 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
but what if you can't rely on your baby Moss to run the right depth?
so there’s a good chance it could be undercut by the CB?
on a fly pattern?
You run straight
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:44 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
throw the ball ahead
If Culpepper can do it Tony can
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:44 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I've noticed romo lining up miles a few times
It’s possible Garrett has an overly complex playbook
by 1youngwiz on Oct 21, 2011 9:58 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
or, they added or modified plays while Miles was out
and he was out of the loop.
Cowboys and Longhorns - getting up off the turf to win another day.
Spurs? It's football season!
time to dumb it down
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 10:42 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I Say Let Romo Loose
Our fortunes rise and fall with him anyway. When he is on, he’s one of the most exciting players in the NFL to watch. He plays better when he’s off the chain.
"You have to have a stronger belief in yourself than the disbelief of others."
Antonio Ramirez Romo
You have a point there " let Romo loose " ,
after watching the “neutered” Romo against NE, i say give the guy his " balls" back and let him do his thing.
Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.
Winston Churchill
We Fight On !!,That's The Cowboys Way !!.
Go Cowboys!!
by scotscowboyfan on Oct 21, 2011 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Not sure we can do that yet,
Last week I was aggravated that Romo didn’t roll out more. The pocket wasn’t all that clean and didn’t last for long but Romo stayed there and rushed some throws. It wasn’t until a day or two later that I realized Garrett was compensating for the rib injury. For Romo to be Romo, he needs to be able to move around. In the meantime, we might just try blocking for him and the RBs, but I fear that’s too much to ask of this line.
Any given sunday...
Of course I want the Boys to win. But they have to wake up. Last time these 2 teams met Boys got taken. Rams am sure are might upset at what they have been doing. Bet they are salivating get some payback on the Boys. Time for the Cowboys to just go in this game & win decisively.
for as long as his line cant protect him
if he stays in the pocket and keeps from rolling out were he is harder to protect he should do pretty well.
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions
sounds familiar
but the team was unable to get into the end zone and only managed one field goal on two attempts
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 8:52 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
miles is
Going to have a huge game he destroys defenses like this
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 8:53 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
What I can see that Tony doesn't
Ok , I know you are wondering what that means. So lets take a look at our QB Tony and see what he is looking at on the field during the last several interceptions he has thrown.After looking at the plays i noticed that i could see that the person Tony was throwing to was definitely not open , so how come Tony couldn’t see it also? .. Well that’s an easy call as it turns out as he has his eyes closed as he throws.
it turns out after watching allot of tape that he is prone to closing his eyes when he expects a hit or feels a hand on him. i don’t blame him for this as i would probley close my eyes and pray i lived threw it, but i think this is what has kept him from being the top QB we all believe and hope he could be, just a thought on what i think could help him take us all the way, keep your eyes open. And we should do fine. Doug
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 8:59 AM CDT reply actions 2 recs
he does do that a lot
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:17 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
yes and its during the worst of times
at times when he is pressured, he does close them. in games that the line is having a hard time keeping him off his back,
its these games when he has to be at the top of his game if we are to win the close or hard ones. that he has to see every player and make the best throw,even if that throw is out of bounds.
im not saying all his ints or bad throws are from shutting his eyes, but it does seem some of them are.
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions
all qbs as well as players close their eyes when getting hit
It’s an natural reaction that can’t be helped.
In Romo we Trust
i guess
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:43 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
ok but
il go along with that to a point,
but its not the fact he closes them its the timing of it that matters.
most QB do close there eyes at some point, but its after they have gotten ride of the ball,covered it up and dropped to the ground, or have just given up on the play.
but its just a thought i thought might help lol
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions
its Terry dude so he will even defend the mistakes romo makes
Romo can do no wrong lol
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:47 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
not dishing romo
wasnt dishing romo
he has other faults if i was going to do dish him. like he is a 3.5 -4.5 second qb
that said.
he has good decision making when his line can give him that amount of time,
the problem is his line hasnt afforded him that much time this yr.
and at 3.0 seconds and less his ability to make strong reads and good decisions falls drastically . but that is the same problem most qbs face today , and why so many roll out, with the speed of the D getting faster and faster the qbs are forced to scramble for time. only a handfull can make the reads in 2-3 seconds .
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions
Romo is one of the best qbs at making quick decisions in the pocket
and his quick release makes it even seem quicker.
In Romo we Trust
humm ok
but if you take out the timing paterns that take no thought just a throw and catch. witch he is good at.
and then take plays that he has to read a defense and make a play while feeling the pressure there is a really big differance in percentage of plays made. and yes he has a quick release . its reading the D after a play falls apart that he needs more time at. .
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions
I think he's the best qb in the league when a play breaks down
Roethlisberger being a close second.
You have to understand that no qb can perform their best under great pressure from the defense’s front seven, they all make their fair share of bad decisions and passes under those circumstances.
In Romo we Trust
Roth is better under pressure than Romo.
Pains me to admit that but it’s true.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Oct 21, 2011 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions
Roth must be better under pressure,
explains how he beats those sex raps..
Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.
Winston Churchill
We Fight On !!,That's The Cowboys Way !!.
Go Cowboys!!
by scotscowboyfan on Oct 21, 2011 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Newbie rec
Welcome to BTB.
Cowboys and Longhorns - getting up off the turf to win another day.
Spurs? It's football season!
i'm going with option C...
it’s a close game — or at least close for a while — that we eventually win.
we’re TNT, guys. The Cowboys love drama.
"They need security in the world, Craig!"
can someone please explain this to me?
The screen game was a big time part of the offensive install during the preseason
Every player had their own screen play designed for them
How many screens have we ran this year? Why are we not seeing these screens that were such a big part of the offensive systems install?
This is mind boggling because you need to play to ones strengths. Our offensive line is built to be athletic and get our guys pulling out downfield
Really makes zero sense to me guys
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:21 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
yes, but it depends on defenses sending the house to get to your QB
if opposing rushers aren’t doing that, then they aren’t a good call. And the passing game hasn’t been threatening enough that opposing rushers feel they MUST make a play or else give up a long pass. As soon as they can hit Miles deep a couple of times, the screen game will come back.
OR
As soon as they can get a decent lead, the screen game will come back. For the same reason, rushers feel like they need to make a play to turn the game. Hopefully, we’ll see it on Sunday for that reason…
question
Do you feel like the lack of screen calls last week were concerning considering we had no run game? A screen may have been a good call on the last possession
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:42 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
ok
But we haven’t seen pressure or blitzes? I need the stats where is OCC!
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:40 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
hummm.
there is only really one reason to call a screen in today’s type game,
that is to stop a teem that has rushed you over and over.as thats the best way to keep the rushers home and not let the play get behind them.
as teems havent really been that crazy with rushing against us, they have gotten home with just the 3 rushers. and gotten tony to move out of pocket
the timing just hasnt been there for that particular play call
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Most teams don't need to blitz against us
Our Line keeps losing the 1-on-1 match ups.
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
yes
and if we can start to win those then we will see alot more pass rushes,and the screen will become the play of choice to keep them home.
but again yo uhave to be able to forcast the blitz , for it to be a good option.other wise you just wasted a down.
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions
redskins game perfect example
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
Follow me at my blog
http://chiacrackscowboysblog.wordpress.com/
by Archie Barberio on Oct 21, 2011 9:45 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Can someone explain to me why we have Brooking, with his 12 tackles, and James, with his 5 tackles as LB's...
when I just read that Lofa Tatupu is still sitting on a couch somewhere watching the games on Sunday?
I know Bruce Carter is on the way...
but it would be nice to have someone experienced like that in a 3-4 defense.
by TheCowboyFan on Oct 21, 2011 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions
I think they rather see what they have in Bruce Carter first
There is a reason why Lofa is still sitting on the couch.
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
looking ahead
ok let me ask you a question ? as a owner looking 5-6 yrs down the road. and what your salery cap is, what players might be traded, or kept. what draftees are comming out in that time. etc. would you rather keep bruce, or take lofa? i think you have to keep what you have and hope for the best.
what you think?
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions
Keep Bruce no question
If Lofa is available next year then I would look into taking a flyer on him. A 1 year contract.
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
a flyer is a good option
but i think his best chance is a injury this yr.
by douglasstapp on Oct 21, 2011 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions
I would go with Carter definitely...
But why not go with Lofa on a one year contract? He played in all 16 games last year and is only 28. Just a thought.
I would do that next year if he is available
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
Lofa weighs 40 lbs. Not ideal for an ilb in a 3-4.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Oct 21, 2011 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions
40lbs?
geez my five year old weighs more than that….
HOwever I will figure you meant 240 lbs at which point I will point out that Sean lee, Jerrod Mayo, Navarro Bowman, and Patrick Wills ALL weigh 245 lbs+/- 5 lbs
I highly doubt that 5 lbs is really that significant
Here’s a theoretical play from 2010: Snap. Tony takes 7 step drop. Tony looks left at Miles, who is doubled, and looks right to where Roy Williams should be…but instead sees Colombo on his back and a Defensive End foaming at the mouth jumping over Marc’s carcass. Tony proceeds to run like hell and look for Witten
-by CotySaxman on Jul 11, 2011 7:50 AM PDT
Am I the most optimistic Cowboys fan in the World? Yes, due to an "unfortunate accident" to the previous holder of the title.
by I am Ironman!!! on Oct 21, 2011 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions
ok but
ok lets say you go with a 1 yr contract, who do you replace that you wouldnt want in the next 3 yrs? is there a player who you have kept and couched that you dont believe in?
makes it a hard decision for a 1 yr guy.
but all is not lost
but if there is a injury to a player then that will open a door for that 1 yr contract. i think thats lofas best chance to get back into the game.



























