Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Drug Testing, Alistair Overeem & UFC 146's Potential Legacy

Air Garrett: From Dallas to Westwood to Egypt

I'm a proud alumnus of UCLA. Although I spoke to him on three separate occasions, I wasn't lucky enough to be there when John Wooden was coaching the basketball team, but I can tell you that his presence could be felt everywhere on that expansive campus. Long after he had left, Wooden was still a factor in every facet of our lives while in school. It's not that he was a great coach. He was that - in spades. No, he was much, much more than that.

Star-divide

One of the things that, to this day, amazed me about the man is how his players were so devoted to him. I'm not talking about how they felt about him during the periods in which they played for him. In fact, many of them were openly at odds with him during their playing tenure. It's more about how they felt and acted towards him ten, twenty and even thirty years after they had played for him. To a man, they used words like, "second father to me", "most important influence in my life" and "greatest man I ever knew".

Having read several books about him, his life and his methods, I often find myself reflecting on one of his quotes, "Success is peace of mind which is a direct result of knowing you made the effort to do your best to become the best that you are capable of becoming". In so few words, so much is said. That too, was a quality about him to which people were drawn. You could not help but hang on his every word. He was a man of great faith and, clearly, a man who saw coaching as an endeavor secondary to the process of helping people gain through his positive influence. He devoted his life to helping lift people up, in some way. to be better than even they realized they could be. There are many great coaches in sports history but, for me, Wooden stands alone in terms of how he achieved greatness through a set of core values that revolved around building people up rather than tearing them down. In that way, he was truly uncommon.

Wooden employed the use of a ‘Pyramid of success' which he himself created. Fifteen blocks that made up the fundamental principles which lead to the apex, success.

Wooden-pyramid-for-web2_medium

via mystayinla.com

In light of the trials that he has had to endure and grow through, I think Jason Garrett could learn a thing or two from this man and, to that end, here are a few principles Garrett could benefit from;

SKILL: Knowledge of and ability to execute the fundamentals. Be prepared. Cover every detail.

One has to wonder, how much practice does it take to line up for a Field Goal in the time allotted an NFL team to do so? How hard is it to get the play call to the QB so he has enough time to communicate it properly in the huddle and get to the line with enough time to go through pre-snap reads? Why are Dallas defenders constantly unsure about where they should be lining up? Dallas continues to struggle in all phases of the game to get their signals between plays from the sideline to the players so they can be ready to go. These are coaching fundamentals. John Wooden never talked about players or coaches failing to execute this play or that play. This isn't a Joe DeCamilis problem or a Hudson Houck problem, it's a team problem and team problems are the responsibility of the coach, the head coach. Garrett would likely get some tough love from Wooden here, as there was no tolerance for those kinds of mental errors in Westwood under his stewardship.

INTENTNESS: Ability to resist temptation and stay with your course.

People talk about Garrett's lack of faith in the offensive line and how that may have affected his decision making. Even when John Wooden was losing games (he lost a ton early in his career) and building a culture, he was never accused of ‘playing scared' or playing not to lose. Dallas' history as a football team is one of being aggressive and putting intense pressure on their opponents to perform flawlessly in order to beat them. Garrett's distrust of this unit or that unit speaks volumes to his players about the kind of man he is and, maybe more important, the kind of men he believes they can be. Wooden would probably counsel Garrett to place more trust in his players to do what they were supposed to do because the upside for that kind of trust has value far beyond that of a single win or loss.

POISE: Just being yourself. Being at ease in any situation. Never fighting yourself.

Dallas threw the football 68% of the time against the Cardinals. While the Cardinals were putting eight in the box to slow down the Cowboys running game, they were still generating 3.8 yards per carry and facing such an aggressive pass rush, there were opportunities to gash the Cardinals and maintain the threat of the run. Late in the game, Dallas completely abandoned the run and, historically, Garrett's offenses have not fared well when doing that. In fact, Garrett has been criticized before about not running the ball enough and now, with one of the game's best backs, a rebuilt offensive line and full control of how the team practices (within the confines of the new CBA), his acquiescence to an unbalanced attack was disheartening. Wooden might say that those situations are the ones where teams learn how to execute even in the toughest of situations and that you can't let an opponent dictate what you do.

COMPETITIVE GREATNESS: Real love of a hard battle. Be at your best when your best is needed.

Against the Cardinals, Garrett had a golden opportunity in the late stages of the game when Dallas had gotten the ball across midfield, to use one of the two remaining time-out's and get things settled enough to move the ball in position for more of a chip shot than the one that Bailey ultimately missed at the end of regulation. Had Garrett been at his best, there should have been no hesitation in making the proper decisions in those critical moments. Those are things that, as we saw, decide the outcomes of games. Wooden would probably ask Garrett how he might handle this or other unforeseen challenges in the future and, by doing so, force Garrett to ensure he could be at his best when needed.

John Wooden is the pinnacle. When people think about the "best ever" in the coaching profession, his name is one of the first to come up. I would never expect Jason Garrett to hold himself to that kind of standard, much less have fans make that kind of unfair comparison. It's to be expected that Garrett will have some growing pains as he learns what it takes to run an organization like the Dallas Cowboys effectively. How easy it is for us to point fingers at Garrett for this mistake or that mistake. Unfortunately, just like it is for Tony Romo and his unenviable comparisons to the great Cowboys QB's, we forget that Garrett's performance will likely be measured against Jimmy Johnson and Tom Landry. Along the way to being mentioned in the same sentence with those men, Garrett would do well to ‘walk like an Egyptian' and learn from the man who not only developed a pyramid, but also a lot of good men along the way.

GO COWBOYS

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Comment 115 comments  |  12 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

great post Blings

nothing to add at this moment…..except Rec’d

Here’s a theoretical play from 2010: Snap. Tony takes 7 step drop. Tony looks left at Miles, who is doubled, and looks right to where Roy Williams should be…but instead sees Colombo on his back and a Defensive End foaming at the mouth jumping over Marc’s carcass. Tony proceeds to run like hell and look for Witten
-by CotySaxman on Jul 11, 2011 7:50 AM PDT

Now, if somebody doesn’t agree with that, that’s cool. I also don’t agree with the fact that I don’t have $10 million in my bank account. But the fact that I don’t agree with it doesn’t make it any less true.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 AM PST

by I am Ironman!!! on Dec 5, 2011 2:27 PM CST reply actions  

What happens after...the moment?

;-)

Thanks IaI

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Fail

maybe you should read the article before you comment:

John Wooden is the pinnacle. When people think about the “best ever” in the coaching profession, his name is one of the first to come up. I would never expect Jason Garrett to hold himself to that kind of standard, much less have fans make that kind of unfair comparison. It’s to be expected that Garrett will have some growing pains as he learns what it takes to run an organization like the Dallas Cowboys effectively.

That quote is the very definition of cutting him a break and allowing him a learning curve.

"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach

by dave33 on Dec 5, 2011 4:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I apologize.

I read it too fast to get the gist of the post.

by TheCowboyFan on Dec 5, 2011 4:43 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

No problem

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 7, 2011 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Outstanding, Blings.

It might not be a line or two, but…

In so few words, so much is said.

Really great post.

"No one ever accomplishes anything alone in football. We all like to think that we can, but that's just not true. It's always been a team game, always will be." - Tom Dempsey

"Leadership is getting someone to do what they don’t want to do, to achieve what they want to achieve." - Tom Landry

by jakezze01 on Dec 5, 2011 2:53 PM CST reply actions  

Thanks j01

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Way to go again Blings!

Bringing out your A game on this one I tell you what. Like Ironman said not much to add to this one.

Optimissum Prime sees nothing but the best for America's Team!!!

by Cowboys_Attack on Dec 5, 2011 5:42 PM CST reply actions  

I need to write something that MAKES you want to add

:-)

Thanks CA

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:43 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd like to add but you covered it so well.

Let’s see one of the things that jumps out at me the most would be the trusting his players more/at all in some cases. I think that has been a huge blunder here. We’ve definitly got some guys that have had very high potential then when they mess up he looses faith and doesnt look their way for a good long time ie Choice, Bennet, Ogletree and our young oline to name a few. It also seems he has lost Dez a little the way he “disappears” during games even though he is one of our biggest playmakers.
I really dont like the way he so blatantly abandons the run early on in a game where we had the lead now it wasn’t a big lead but it was a lead. One thing that really drives me nuts is 3 and outs off incompletions. At least give her a run on 2nd down to try and keep their defense honest and to give our defense a break cuz you can run off some of the clock and what not.

Optimissum Prime sees nothing but the best for America's Team!!!

by Cowboys_Attack on Dec 6, 2011 6:38 AM CST up reply actions  

very Parcells like.....
We’ve definitly got some guys that have had very high potential then when they mess up he looses faith and doesnt look their way for a good long time

to a fault… Parcells refused to let Romo be Romo vs the Seahwks. Should have never come down to the botched fg.

Jerry is the end all in Dallas.

by football mensa on Dec 6, 2011 6:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah really bit us in the butt on that one!

I’m just hoping that since this is his first year as HC he gets himself an OC in the offseason one who can really tap into all the potential/talent we have and set this offense on fire. We have so many weapons it’s scary. This week we get all of them at our disposal I’m hopeful that we start seeing some of Ironman’s crazy formations during this end stretch. My real hope is they have been keeping their secrets for the end of the year this final stretch to go into the playoffs hot and heavy. I think we sat Miles on purpose last week against the Cards to give him one more week to get 100% for the Gmen. Fingers crossed

Optimissum Prime sees nothing but the best for America's Team!!!

by Cowboys_Attack on Dec 6, 2011 9:58 AM CST up reply actions  

No, that's incorrect

Parcells didn’t attack the DB’s of the Seahawks (remember Pete Hunter was signed by Seattle off of the street the prior week). I think he should have been far more aggressive through the air in that game.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 6, 2011 1:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Thats what we mean let Romo be Romo and attack through the air.

Pick that secondary apart with Witten, Glenn, and TO they were in sync that first year I tell you what.

Optimissum Prime sees nothing but the best for America's Team!!!

by Cowboys_Attack on Dec 6, 2011 1:54 PM CST up reply actions  

“Success is peace of mind, which is a direct result of self-satisfaction in knowing you made the effort to do your best to become the best that you are capable of becoming.”

Notice the tense shift, Past to Present through and leading to Future. Unceasingly. Might the message be, in part, that the learning and doing, “the effort” in it’s fullest sense, never ends? That “Best” is ever-unattainable but for being in the active pursuit of it, in that unceasing cycle of effort and improvement, as when Future becomes Past in the learning? Success being the peace of mind in knowing you do so, that you never cease learning? That you’re capable of it.

After all, once best’s achieved, no improvement’s possible. I doubt that was Wooden’s intended message, the definition of “success” as “peace of mind” aside.

If Garrett’s not learned to “walk this way”, you’re right, he’d “best” learn. Or is that learn “Best”?

Figure Coach’s best is yet to be. Only Time’ll tell and only he can tell if he has the peace of mind Wooden’s defined “success” as there.

Cry 'Havoc!'

by tanstaafl on Dec 5, 2011 5:50 PM CST reply actions  

"His best is yet to be"

It had better. Given his tendency to panic in play calling and in-game decision-making, if he doesn’t get better soon, he won’t have much of a head coaching career.

by kindablue on Dec 5, 2011 6:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, but think about...

… the huge opportunity for improvement that’d be for him. In being canned, that is. Being unable to feel his emotional state in the moment and not having relevant bio-chemical data, I’ll not comment on “panic”.

Here’s hoping the improvement to “better” is a smaller one. Or we’re in for a wearying ride.

Cry 'Havoc!'

by tanstaafl on Dec 5, 2011 7:30 PM CST up reply actions  

His problem is faith

He needs to give those guys a chance to fail. Coaches who are on thin ice don’t approach their work with a long-term perspective.

I had that problem with Parcells.

Lacewell and Campo made for a bad combo and their quick fixes for the personnel problems the team had did them no good.

Ever notice how teams that are out of the running for a playoff berth seem to improve their overall play? It’s because they relax and do the things they’ve learned how to do without the pressure that can make them over-think things.

The same thing happens to coaches.

Yesterday was a time to let it all hang out.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Hill or George Michael?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:56 PM CST up reply actions  

And if I say "neither"?

All the while playing off her SNF opening. And yours.
Heyyy, Abbbotttt…

Cry 'Havoc!'

by tanstaafl on Dec 6, 2011 12:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Course neither Limp Bizkit?

Optimissum Prime sees nothing but the best for America's Team!!!

by Cowboys_Attack on Dec 6, 2011 7:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Nice

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 6, 2011 1:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Campo and insert any name makes for a bad combo.
Lacewell and Campo made for a bad combo

Jerry should have Campo stricken from anything Cowboys relating to head coaches.

Jerry is the end all in Dallas.

by football mensa on Dec 6, 2011 5:17 AM CST up reply actions  

He shouldn't be on the staff

What unit is the worst on the team by far?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 6, 2011 1:29 PM CST up reply actions  

like USC

Had any record of the bush heisman banished from their campus?

Is there a petition? Where do I sign?

Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack.
~Sun Tzu

by CDMac24 on Dec 8, 2011 7:55 PM CST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Wow now that you mention it yeah I have noticed that.

Huh makes plenty of sense once I open my mind up enough to think about it. You’ve got those teams that were getting those close losses in the early part of the season and now that they arent playing for the big game they can just go out and play. Its amazing what the fundementals can do for your team. Best example this year would have to be Miami they just out there ruining it for other teams LOL.

Optimissum Prime sees nothing but the best for America's Team!!!

by Cowboys_Attack on Dec 6, 2011 7:04 AM CST up reply actions  

...and playing pretty well while doing it!

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 6, 2011 1:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes indeed they are quite well.

This year has been crazy lotta close games all year long. Pack have come away with a few they had to pull outta their keesters. Should be an intresting end to the year too!

Optimissum Prime sees nothing but the best for America's Team!!!

by Cowboys_Attack on Dec 6, 2011 1:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh, great post, Blings, as always

Wooden has been one of my few coaching idols. He was calm, poised, intellectual, principled and responsible. The thing that stuck with me about Wooden was he hardly ever got up from his seat. His teams were so well-coached and prepared, he didn’t need to be frantically yelling all the time. The fact that only two of his former players from those great UCLA teams of the 1960’s and 1970’s made the Hall of Fame tells me he won by preparation and coaching, not by amassing talent.

It’s been a long time since we’ve had a coach like that for the Cowboys.

by kindablue on Dec 5, 2011 7:06 PM CST reply actions  

Almost never got up from his seat

Bill Plaschke of the L.A. Times said he counted twice over a period of years.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

To Bill Brasky? ;-)

Optimissum Prime sees nothing but the best for America's Team!!!

by Cowboys_Attack on Dec 6, 2011 7:10 AM CST up reply actions  

And thanks, kb

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Well done!

As usual…..

If the play works, never run it again. If it fails, keep running it.
First and goal at the one. Run it three times in a row, and then kick a field goal. Sound familiar?

by CoachGary on Dec 5, 2011 8:17 PM CST reply actions  

Thanks CG

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:48 PM CST up reply actions  

I think there is a philosophical difference between Garrett and Wooden

Garrett has repeatedly stated that the offense should take what the defense gives them. As you note, Wooden believes in not letting an opponent dictate what you do.

I always thought that Wooden’s philosophy was much like what Jimmy Johnson did in Dallas in the nineties.

Jason Garrett’s offensive philosophy parallels that of the late, great Tom Landry.

Both won two Super Bowls. Both were successful following their respective strategy.

Given that Garrett has spoken about placing players in positions to succeed, how much of a perceived distrust in the offensive line is really trying to instill confidence through situation specific success? It would serve no purpose to repeatedly ask the offensive line to do something that it has difficulty executing.

I feel that most perceptions of Garrett are not well founded. In fact, I believe that the vast majority of head coaches in the NFL have many of the traits on the pyramid above. It would be hard to achieve one of the best 32 jobs in the world without having acheived success along the way.

Great post. I always enjoy learning from the greats.

by ScarletO on Dec 5, 2011 8:51 PM CST reply actions  

A good offensive coordinator

Knows how to cover for poor offensive line play. Arizona was coming on inside blitzes, which leaves the middle of the field wide open. Screens and slants can be thrown before the pass rush arrives and would slow down the blitz.

On the other hand, if the quarterback consistently takes deep drops, it plays right into the hands of the defense. If we keep calling those plays in a close game where there is no need to pass as often as we did, the offensive coordinator is doing just the opposite of taking what the defense gives them, and the opposite of placing his players in a position to succeed. It’s maximizing our chances of failing.

I’d like to see Garrett win one playoff game before anyone starts comparing him to an all-time great like Landry.

by kindablue on Dec 5, 2011 9:12 PM CST up reply actions  

You never stop running the ball

You might change HOW you run it, but you never, ever stop running the ball.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:56 PM CST up reply actions  

+53

(29+24we miss you)

Optimissum Prime sees nothing but the best for America's Team!!!

by Cowboys_Attack on Dec 6, 2011 7:32 AM CST up reply actions  

Thanks SO

If you think NFL coaches follow the principles in the pyramid, why do you think some coaches fail while others succeed?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Quote of the week:

Players win games. Coaches can only lose them.
Not that I agree 100% with this quote, but unfortunately all coaches live and die by their players. Some coaches are just better at bringing that talent out, I guess.

"No one ever accomplishes anything alone in football. We all like to think that we can, but that's just not true. It's always been a team game, always will be." - Tom Dempsey

"Leadership is getting someone to do what they don’t want to do, to achieve what they want to achieve." - Tom Landry

by jakezze01 on Dec 6, 2011 11:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, I don't agree with that quote

If the Jets win a Super Bowl, it will be rex Ryan’s win as much as anyone’s.

After what he went through, Tom Coughlin won the Super Bowl over the Pats as much as anyone else.

It’s funny, but you seldom mention the name of a HOF coach who never had a great QB. I wonder if that’s the prerequisite?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 6, 2011 1:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow, that is a good question.

As with athletes, I believe that there are many ways to coach to win. Some athletes have superior athletic ability (Dez Bryant) while others rely on a superior understanding of the sport and its intricacies (Wes Welker). Coaches also fall along a similar spectrum.

While the vast majority (if not all) of successful athletes and coaches have the traits noted in Wooden’s pyramid, they are not in the same proportions. There are also external factors that impact the success of a coach. And as with everything in life, nothing stays static, so as a coach grows, he/she may find more or less success.

Belichick is a great example for most of this. In Cleveland, Bill had not developed any dominant trait sufficiently to offset the traits that were underdeveloped. As Belickick grew, he learned and developed into a better coach.

But had Bill gone to Detroit with Matt Millen as the GM, he would still be perceived as floundering. Not only would he be in a poorly structured environment, but he would also have inferior talent on his team. I feel safe in stating that Lombardi could have been in Detroit and still had a losing record.

Belichick had some good fortune in that he had a quarterback like Tom Brady. Brady is more of an intellectual quarterback, and that fits in with Bill’s biggest strength as I see it as a coach: his football intelligence. Had Vince Young been drafted as the starting quarterback in New England, I doubt Bill’s style would have helped Vince Young win a Super Bowl.

One thing that I think all successful athletes, coaches, and people in general possess, is an incredible insight into their own strengths and weaknesses. I do not see it on Wooden’s pyramid (it’s probably there somewhere), but I think it is paramount in life and sports.

by ScarletO on Dec 6, 2011 12:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought you were going to make it easy and say

…because some get lucky and find great QB’s to play with and others don’t.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 6, 2011 1:32 PM CST up reply actions  

high 5's Bling.....

there are things about Garrett that reminds me of Landry in his early years. if he turns out to be close to that good, well…. i wont need to say more ……. by the way …..

R E C !

woman !, don't try to understand em, don't try to make them understand you, for they are a breed apart ! lol
(redskins)= A Tale of 2 owners, bought by Snyder, OWNED by the COWBOYS
Id say RIP Al Davis, but i know your up there drunker than a monkey and clocking angels in the 40 yd dash.

by demonbane on Dec 5, 2011 9:10 PM CST reply actions  

Thanks

I think Garrett will have to find his own way.

You seldom see greatness replicated like that.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:52 PM CST up reply actions  

GREAT POST BLINGER...

But I have to add…and I do not see many people mentioning this (media or on site)…

Tony Romo tossed a beautiful TD pass on a terrific call by Jason Garrett that won the Cowboys the game….only one problem…Felix Jones never reacted to the ball.

That was an easy TD…great call…great pass…terrible reception.

Ball game!

You HAVE TO convert those plays…HAVE TO…if you want continued success in the NFL.

by Rome One on Dec 5, 2011 9:54 PM CST reply actions  

That one made me groan

But didn’t you just feel in your gut that the longer the Cards hung around, the less likely we were to win?

You can’t play with knives as many times as Dallas has done, with lesser teams (I think), and not expect to get cut.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:53 PM CST up reply actions  

my reaction to this play

at the time was to pick my bottom jaw off my lap and sigh: lack of vision.
Same thing we’ve seen from him in the backfield. I love what Felix brings to this team but I wholeheartedly subscribe to him being the CoP back rather than the workhorse. I like my backs to have great vision and foreword body lean. Felix has a role but this play highlighted why that role shouldn’t be as the primary back. Heck if he can’t make that play maybe I even start to question that 3rd down back role.

Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack.
~Sun Tzu

by CDMac24 on Dec 8, 2011 8:07 PM CST via iPhone app up reply actions  

I think one play where a back can't see a pass coming to him on that wheel route is not an offense worth berating him over

…but the rest of your point is what I found compelling.

He doesn’t have the kind of skills and abilities to be the #1 back on this team and never did. Can we have a do-over with that Rashard Mendenhall pick?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 9, 2011 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Good stuff Blings

Garrett probably has read the books you have. He worked for Saban and Parcells. He also went and observed Coach K. With Garrett, I feel like the team is doing the best it has in years with their gameday preparation, besides that Philly game.

The road issues are troubling, the O Line seems to always fail away from home, and the offense has mis-communication issues.

I hope Garrett evaluates after the season is over and sees that he needs Norv. Oh and I’m not a Joe D fan, being better than Bruce Read does not mean it’s a position that can’t be upgraded. I wonder if someone did a study, where would the cowboys rank in special teams penalties committed in the league?

As for the game, Arizona seems to always involve something awful. Whether Garrett will admit or not, he made a crucial mistake. Hopefully, he will learn for this. I’m grateful that it happened in the regular season in a low-stakes game, and not against a divisional rival or in the playoffs.

"There are no traffic jams along the extra mile."- Roger Staubach
Pet Cat of 2011- Barry Church!
I STILL believe in Tony Romo.- 10/2/11

by Rat-Pack on Dec 5, 2011 10:29 PM CST reply actions  

Thanks RP

It will be interesting to see how they bounce back.

Watching both the Gnats and Cowboys play this week, Dallas certainly looked like the inferior team. But…anything can happen.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 5, 2011 10:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Blings, awesome read.

I prefer Wooden’s m.o. . Look at the Packers. They don’t care what you do. They will do what they want. McCarthy plays to win. A style I believe that instills confidence in players. There is an attitude. A confidence. The Packers players have confidence in McCarthy.

When a team has cause like that I think you see fewer mistakes. Hard to watch Dallas sometimes act like a div 2 college team.

Blings I am not even close to being sold on Garrett. He has a politician feel to him. No culpability.

Jerry is the end all in Dallas.

by football mensa on Dec 6, 2011 5:36 AM CST reply actions  

If that's it, the politico

It’s accountability, not culpability, you intend. He’s culpable. Read your own views and those of others. I hope the unease regarding his demeanor does not have that at its root. The politician.

Cry 'Havoc!'

by tanstaafl on Dec 6, 2011 8:19 AM CST up reply actions  

If the glove don't fit......

but it does…..like a glove

Jerry is the end all in Dallas.

by football mensa on Dec 6, 2011 9:08 AM CST up reply actions  

knives?

They’ve been twirling fully loaded pistols aimed at their collective temples. BANG!

Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack.
~Sun Tzu

by CDMac24 on Dec 8, 2011 8:11 PM CST via iPhone app up reply actions  

LOL

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 9, 2011 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

excellent point

Rick has trashed every program he’s touched. Starting with my alma mater, CU, he’s left a trail of tears. I grew up rooting for UCLA (SoCal boy) so I’m glad they are free from his reign.

Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack.
~Sun Tzu

by CDMac24 on Dec 8, 2011 8:13 PM CST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Jim Mora Jr.?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 9, 2011 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

So what it is about the Pyramid...

that a great like Wooden would use as a “TOTAL” foundation? All of those blocks speak to building character except “Skill”. Interesting that skill is right smack in the middle of the pyramid. Although we know talent is necessary to win, he never mentions it. Hmm.

This is probably an appropriate time to pen a piece like this Blings. Very perceptive on your part. For the last year Garrett has instilled many things in this team that it needed. He has really done of a good job of structure. His mistakes, at least, the ones on the field, have been glaring. They are rookie mistakes. I don’t want to say ‘when you’re driving the bus’ because that’s not a good analogy. When you’re ‘piloting the 747’ may be a little more akin to navigating an NFL team through a period of growth.

For a quality coach it is easy to put the first 12 or 13 aspects of winning into place. It’s the final 2 or 3 steps that elude those that never reach the pinnacle. I would hazard a guess that Wooden didn’t know the entire pyramid when he was a young coach. That the pyramid became complete after he won consistently.

Garrett is still in the beginning stages of building his program. I think he’s still learning. It’s so easy to see from the sidelines. It’s another thing entirely to actually navigate the 747. Me? I still think he hasn’t completely eradicated the poison left behind by Wade. He also still hasn’t completely filled in the blank under ‘Skill’.

The Cardinals achieved their goal; stop the run. They stacked the line and executed. It takes conviction to succeed with the run against a team that is determined to stop it. How many times did Dorsett hit a wall 20 times, then break one off? Emmett too. But those teams had better offensive lines. Better defensive lines.

I still don’t see Garrett taking that next step. But it could happen at any time. Garrett believes in what he is doing. That doesn’t mean he’s right. Nor does it mean he’s wrong. He’s a passing fool. But he will run, he’s proven that. Whether he uses the Wooden pyramid, or fulfills his potential along his own path, you can’t discount the fact that he is still a half a dozen players or more away from having the roster to compete with the best.

Who are you? And how did you get in here?
I'm a locksmith..and..I'm a locksmith. -- Frank Drebin.

by White Wolf on Dec 6, 2011 6:15 AM CST reply actions   2 recs

Thanks, as always, WW

The ‘Skill’ piece is a good catch by you. Actually, it’s more of a personal linkage than many might think. You see, Wooden himself was like Mark Stepnoski as a basketball player in that he was undersized and wasn’t what you’d think of as a typical basketball player. That said, he was the hardest working human being any high school, college or pro coach ever met. He worked on the fundamentals of the game in a way that far exceeded the commitment of his contemporaries. That commitment allowed him to lead his teams to championships in high school and while at Purdue University. Along the way, he was named all-State in Indiana as a high school player three times and a three-time all-American at Purdue.

Yes, John Wooden was a self made player and the word, “Skill” was synonymous with practice and preparation. It had nothing to do with God-given talents or stature. I think Garrett has work to do in this area and I’m hopeful he can learn from his mistakes and become a better coach and leader from the experience.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 6, 2011 1:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Interesting.

Skill does suggest something developed, acquired, while talent is something inherited, god-given, etc. You and I both know he had some very naturally gifted and talented players during his reign at UCLA. Not trying to question the man’s accomplishments, which speak for themselves, but he did at times have the best talent. It would be interesting to hear his response to why it’s not in the pyramid. Somehow, I bet he’d admit that it’s difficult to win without the most talented players.

I know that all teams have talent, but they don’t all win championships. However, the most talented teams often do win. Even undisciplined teams win sometimes. Why? Because they are so gifted athletically. Hate to use these examples, but Michael Jordan wasn’t the nicest guy in the world, but he killed it on the court because he was simply the best player. Same with Tiger Woods. Same for Jerry Rice. I know they worked harder than other players, but lots of players work harder than everyone else, and don’t win championships.

Hence my point about Garrett doing it his way, and believing in his way. John Wooden is a legend, the pinnacle, but I don’t think his way is the only way. And in some ways, I think talent is more important now than it was in his era.

I didn’t realize Wooden was also a successful player. Cool.

Who are you? And how did you get in here?
I'm a locksmith..and..I'm a locksmith. -- Frank Drebin.

by White Wolf on Dec 6, 2011 2:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes, he did so much with so little in terms of his own talent

One has to wonder though, while he was a coach, did he have the best talent, or did he develop the talent he had more than any other coach was able to (with the talent they had) and make them the greats that we now know them to have been?

For him, the old maxim – “the harder I work the luckier I seem to get” seemed to hold true.

Let’s remember that even Jordan wasn’t Jordan until they brought Pippen, Rodman and some additional role players to the party. Even then, they needed Phil Jackson’s ability to keep the egos in check.

But you’re right, there are more ways than one to be a great coach.

One thing I would say; even more talent woudln’t have overcome the mental errors we saw on Sunday. You still have to get those critical calls right.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 6, 2011 6:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, let's not kid.

There was Jordan, and there was everyone else. As far as Phil Jackson. How many of those 11 championships does he win without Michael, Scottie, Shaq, and Kobe? You’re saying championships are won based on the pyramid. I’m saying Wooden won championships using the pyramid, but he also had players like Lew Alcindor, Walt Hazzard, Gail Goodrich, Jamal Wilkes, etc.

As for Sunday, let’s leave my suggestion that we’re 6 players away from being a legitimate multiple Super Bowl contender out of it for a moment. Had Miles been on the field, would Dez have drawn PP the whole game? That one player, already on the roster, would have meant a top level WR was on an average corner on every play. With Miles, AZ can’t stack the line with eight and nine men to stop DeMarco. For that matter, why didn’t Felix turn his head when he was in the open? How about Scandrick using his head for something besides a blunt force object?

How many times this year have the Cowboys had a healthy Miles and Dez on the field at the same time? That would be zero. That’s a dynamic that teams must plan for, and defend against. It takes resources. So while Garrett’s failure to call a timeout with 24 seconds left was a mistake, causing us to not get off at least one more offensive play, with a healthy roster, he’s probably not in that position.

I totally agree that he pyramid, if followed, would make this a better team. But without players, the pyramid won’t get you to the pinnacle.

Who are you? And how did you get in here?
I'm a locksmith..and..I'm a locksmith. -- Frank Drebin.

by White Wolf on Dec 7, 2011 6:19 AM CST up reply actions  

His first championship as a coach was with Gail goodrich and Walt Hazzard as his top players. His center was Fred Slaughter.

He won without a ton of talent and it was his style and demeanor that attracted players with great potential like those you mentioned.

His first year at UCLA, he took essentially the same roster that went 12-13 the year before to 22-7.

It wasn’t the talent that made the man. It was the man that made the talent.

That’s Garrett’s challenge.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 7, 2011 9:19 AM CST up reply actions  

In regards to Garrett....

clever idiot or stupid genius.

Which would prefer ?

Jerry is the end all in Dallas.

by football mensa on Dec 7, 2011 2:50 PM CST up reply actions  

The latter

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 7, 2011 8:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Perhaps they're both options.

As well as others. While Jordan may not have won 6 titles without Jackson, I still think he would have won. He didn’t have Jackson at NC. Not that anyone really knows the answers to hypotheticals. Come to think of it, that’s what we posters do is live in a world of hypotheticals. Would Jackson have won titles with Charles Barkley, or Reggie Miller? hmm. There’s that humming sound again.

Who are you? And how did you get in here?
I'm a locksmith..and..I'm a locksmith. -- Frank Drebin.

by White Wolf on Dec 9, 2011 10:31 AM CST up reply actions  

No, he just had James Worthy, Sam Perkins and Dean Smith

A paucity of talent and good coaching, eh?

:-)

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 9, 2011 11:03 AM CST up reply actions  

You keep not answering the question.

Who are you? And how did you get in here?
I'm a locksmith..and..I'm a locksmith. -- Frank Drebin.

by White Wolf on Dec 9, 2011 11:18 AM CST up reply actions  

I think Jackson would have won titles with them

Would he have won AS MANY?

Probably not.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 9, 2011 11:38 AM CST up reply actions  

That's my point

Both can be true. Talent can make the man. And the man, while he may not be able to develop talent, can develop skill, which works much the same way as talent once acquired.

Who are you? And how did you get in here?
I'm a locksmith..and..I'm a locksmith. -- Frank Drebin.

by White Wolf on Dec 9, 2011 10:33 AM CST up reply actions  

In the end, you want the guy who has the ability to raise the level of play of whatever level of talent he has around him

…to that next level through dedication, hard work and a passion for excellence.

Is Garrett that kind of man?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 9, 2011 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Have I missed the point?

Are you saying Garrett is not the man for the job?

Who are you? And how did you get in here?
I'm a locksmith..and..I'm a locksmith. -- Frank Drebin.

by White Wolf on Dec 9, 2011 11:18 AM CST up reply actions  

I found this quote from Wooden.
If you’re not making mistakes, then you’re not doing anything. I’m positive that a doer makes mistakes.

Garrett has had a very good 1st year. There has been mistakes, by he and the team. To be expected with any culture change. Certainly too soon to question whether he is that kind of man.

I also found this one.

I’d rather have a lot of talent and a little experience than a lot of experience and a little talent.

And finally this:

Winning takes talent; to repeat takes character.

I’d say he supports both of out suppositions.

Who are you? And how did you get in here?
I'm a locksmith..and..I'm a locksmith. -- Frank Drebin.

by White Wolf on Dec 9, 2011 12:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Indeed

What he didn’t like was talent that refused to put in the work to become the best their talent would allow them to be.

I think he would have tossed guys like Dez and Telly B out the window.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 9, 2011 3:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Jordan won three titles without Rodman, and Pippen won none without Jordan

Wooden had the best talent (Alcindor, Walton), and he developed lesser players. It was a combination of the two

Lifelong Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/

I would love to show you the finer points to a muay thai clinch whipped knee to the face seanrude
by matt575 on Nov 22, 2011 3:09 AM EST

by Seanrude on Dec 7, 2011 8:46 AM CST up reply actions  

He was unable to win anything of consequence, despite being the game's best player, until...

Pippen became an All-Star under (wait for it) Phil Jackson’s tutelage. I never thought Pippen was all that great. He also had Horace Grant there. Eventually, Rodman replaced Ho as the third leg of the stool.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 7, 2011 9:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Jordan was just a me-first scoring machine

Until Jackson arrived and forced the Bulls to play passing-first team basketball. After that, he became a great player, although a lot of his alleged greatness was hype.

by kindablue on Dec 7, 2011 4:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Jordan's ascension

had as much to do with the passing of the torch from the Pistons and Lakers as it had to do with Phil Jackson’s arrival. While Jackson did teach Jordan to be a more disciplined player, every player evolves as they become 4th or 5th year players. To me it had more to do with Jordan reaching the pinnacle of his talent, than it did with any other factor.

You could also argue that as Pippen developed more toughness, he was worthy of touching the ball more. His first couple of years he wasn’t ready to accept the challenges of the physicality he faced.

Who are you? And how did you get in here?
I'm a locksmith..and..I'm a locksmith. -- Frank Drebin.

by White Wolf on Dec 9, 2011 10:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Hmmm

I think Jordan gives more credit to Jackson than you’re giving him.

:-)

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 9, 2011 11:07 AM CST up reply actions  

It's exactly the opposite.

I give some of the credit to Jackson. How much credit are you giving to Jordan?

Who are you? And how did you get in here?
I'm a locksmith..and..I'm a locksmith. -- Frank Drebin.

by White Wolf on Dec 9, 2011 11:20 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh I think he was the greatest scorer in history when he was at the top of his game

He improved mightily as a passer and defender under Jackson, though.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 9, 2011 11:40 AM CST up reply actions  

I would be curious

to know what Garrett offensive productivity has been in the month of December since he has been the OC for Dallas. I am borderline Alzheimer’s, and too dumb to figure it online, but I cannot remember our offense being very good during his tenure in December.

I have never felt like our offensive, who ever is manning the o-line positions, during his tenure, has been good dealing with pressure from the defense, or just dealing with pressure during the moment.

Maybe it’s Romo, or just the game plan that’s being put out, but has our offensive productivity declined during December?

by juniorb on Dec 6, 2011 10:35 PM CST reply actions  

Probably

Given Romo’s struggles during the month, it’s safe to say that the offense has struggled late in the year. That said, I don’t think Garrett’s game plans vary greatly as the winter months come along, so I doubt it has too much to do with the game plan.

The eye test tells me that, outside of 2007, Dallas has struggled to run the ball inside the red zone and that is a key element in scoring once you get in close. That’s probably more an indictment of the O-line (and maybe its position coach) than anything else.

Do you think he is not doing something he should be in December?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 6, 2011 10:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Not "winning"

But at 9-12, one could say “more”. Challenge’s not so much December as January.

Cry 'Havoc!'

by tanstaafl on Dec 7, 2011 10:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Poor December's lead to absence in January's

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 7, 2011 10:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Abstinence even

The voluntary restraint from indulging in bodily activities that are widely experienced as giving pleasure. Volunteered with each loss.

Luckily(?) for him, the extended schedule’s contributed to the 3-3 January record. Great Caesar’s Ghost, statistically, he’s helped achieve a better Cowboys record in January than December. And yeah, you’re right, ‘cuz the lone season with no January was that aching trinity-loss 2008’s December. Ahhh, stats, ain’t numbers wonderful…

Cry 'Havoc!'

by tanstaafl on Dec 7, 2011 11:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I dont know what it is Blings,

I’ve read just about every single fanpost you’ve written on here for a few years now and before this last season I remember opposing various viewpoints you had.
This year, it’s like you reach into my brain, untangle all of the nonsense and put it down in pixels for everyone to enjoy.

Garrett had a bad game, but I tend to give him a little latitude because he’s a rookie head coach, and I really still like where the team is heading under his tutelage.

by mahuebel on Dec 7, 2011 1:44 AM CST reply actions  

I agree about Garrett...

Landry was 4-12-1 after 16 games…Jimmy Johnson was 1-15…Jason Garrett…9-7…I understand it’s a small sample size, but the future looks bright for him. Imagine this team with just a few more pieces to it.

by TheCowboyFan on Dec 7, 2011 9:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Let's be careful with the whole "few more pieces" theories

Generally what happens is you get a few and you lose a few.

I never thought I would miss Chris Canty, but man, our DE’s just make me crazy.

I even miss Kevin Burnett!

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 7, 2011 9:36 AM CST up reply actions  

True, but what has Canty really done with the Giants?

If they can repeat last years draft success i like their future. That was point…I think.

by TheCowboyFan on Dec 7, 2011 9:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Amen

Canty was always a 3-4 DE. Too tall to play inside in a 4-3. At 6’7", he can’t get low and under the pads of OG’s. The NYG added (essentially) by subtracting from Dallas in that move.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 7, 2011 9:45 AM CST up reply actions  

exactly

As soon as you find that missing piece your QB, OLB, and WR show up to camp having been “brooking’d”. That is, they just can’t play anymore no matter how much they want to will themselves to do so. So you start over with 3 new pieces and start searching for the final 2. The coaches that are able to find the final pieces from those spread before them on the table are the ones that consistently succeed. A coach who is able to foster an environment where players blossom into those final pieces doesn’t have to chase those pieces; he’s able to put them in place and finish his puzzle.

Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack.
~Sun Tzu

by CDMac24 on Dec 8, 2011 8:37 PM CST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Ratliffis fast becoming the new Keith Brooking

I am so disappointed with the way they’ve handled what has been a truly uncommon talent. Letting him get buried by 650 pounds of humanity on every play for this long is just inexcusable.

Where is OUR version of BJ Raji?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 9, 2011 11:09 AM CST up reply actions  

+100

Been saying this for 3 seasons! Where is our Super-sized NT that allows us to move Rat to DE and then we have a stellar pass rush

RexP

by Rex Pfister on Dec 10, 2011 5:56 PM CST up reply actions  

I like hearing the opposition

It forces me to think…maybe I’m totally off of my rocker? It wouldn’t be the first time.

Know why I love football? It’s because of the nonsense. It’s impossible to decode the randomness of how this ball might bounce on any given play. There are no givens (as we saw from inside 50 yards on Sunday) in this game. There are no routine fly balls or free throws.

I appreciate statistics as much as the next guy, but this game, unlike say, baseball, cannot ever have its back story told in cold, formulaic terms. This is a ferocious game of warriors who risk significant bodily harm on every play. The beauty of a 11-yard run where a running back has to reverse field, break a tackle and make two defenders miss isn’t ever going to be told in the box score.

There’s a different type of human influence needed when you have to get guys amped up to go and throw their bodies around on the field for 60+ minutes and to do it in a way that is both well-orchestrated and well-executed. Football coaches are a truly different breed, mainly because they have to be.

I really appreciate you reading, disagreeing and, most of all, commenting. Thanks.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 7, 2011 9:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Isn't it time you updated your QB rankings?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 7, 2011 8:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Soon

I take my last final exam in grad school in a couple of weeks, and will have plenty of time after the season is over to a deluxe 2011 fanpost. My prediction of Phillip Rivers stepping up obviously fell flat; we’ll see how the rest of the league turns out. Stay tuned…

by kindablue on Dec 7, 2011 8:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Talk about regressing to 2007 levels. Besting, even.

Or’s that worsing? Though, there’s 4 games yet to go. Lad’s looked plain bewildered, some games.

btw, good fortune on the exam. “last final” gave a redundant chuckle.

Cry 'Havoc!'

by tanstaafl on Dec 7, 2011 11:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Penultimate final before the Final final?

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Dec 8, 2011 9:44 AM CST up reply actions  

Egyptian Mummies.

I thought the article was about how the Dallas Cowboy’s are just like Egyptian mummies….
“Pressing for time”.

by Chetohimler on Dec 8, 2011 4:45 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Demarco_murray_st_louis_rams_v_dallas_cowboys_baxpocve6rkl_small
Headed in the Right Direction...(Delusional or Reality)
Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...
Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants
Small
A LETTER TO MIKE JENKINS...
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys Athletic D-Linemen

Recent FanPosts

09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Bedtime Stories Part 1: What KMAAN
222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
2012: Random Thoughts about Anything but a Quiet Offseason
Small
Beat the Pass Rush
Small
Romo and the Super Bowl Question
Small
How much does pass rush matter?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn