2010 Cowboys Offensive Line: Individual Grades And Possible Free Agents
Without an efficient offensive line, it becomes very difficult to move the football, and even the best offensive players can struggle to produce without effective pass protection or holes to run through. This is not rocket science.
Many fans are baffled by why the Cowboys didn't use the draft and free agency last year to address what was widely perceived to be multiple immediate needs on the offensive line. A part of the answer to that may be found in how the coaching staff graded the players on the offensive line last year.
Now wouldn't it be nice if we knew the actual grades the Cowboys hand out for each player? Not likely to happen, but in Profootballfocus (PFF) we do have access to a data source that does a similar exercise for all NFL teams.
Today we look at the individual grades for our linemen and bring our detailed series about the Cowboys run and pass blocking to a close.
Once again, we'll use the Profootballfocus (PFF) data for this review. Please refer to the running back position review if you are unfamiliar with their metrics.
Overall Grade Cowboys Linemen:
Below are the PFF grades for the Cowboys' linemen.
| Player | POS | NFL Rank | # of snaps | 2010 Overall Grade | Pass Block | Screen Block | Run Block | Penalty | '09 Grade | 09 Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doug Free |
LT | 3/39 | 1,105 | 17.9 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 17.8 | -3.5 | 5.6 | 571 |
| Kyle Kosier |
LG | 13/41 | 849 | 2.2 | 4.2 | 1.0 | -3.9 | 0.9 | 15.9 | 1,098 |
| Andre Gurode |
C | 6/34 | 1,105 | 13.2 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 8.6 | -2.8 | 12.7 | 1,093 |
| Leonard Davis |
RG | 8/40 | 1,077 | 6.7 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 13.4 | 1,098 |
| Marc Colombo |
RT | 36/37 | 1,027 | -34.1 | -25.0 | 1.5 | -8.1 | -2.5 | 6.1 | 544 |
Note that NFL rank refers to the rank at the specific position, e.g. left tackle or right tackle. In this example, Doug Free grades out as the third best left tackle overall behind the Bengals' Andrew Whitworth (+24.6) and the Dolphins' Jake Long (+24.3). Among all tackles he would rank fourth, with the Giants RT Kareem McKenzie (+23.6) edging him out. The guard position is similarly split into left and right guards.
There are a couple of things of note here that we've partially touched on in the previous four posts on the O-line:
Significant drop vs. 2009: Free is obviously the bright spot on the line, as he built on his 2009 performance. Gurode maintained his above average grade from last year. Many people may disagree with Gurode's Pro Bowl nomination, but he did grade out as the best center in the NFC. That that may nit mean much is a completely different issue. Davis, Kosier and especially Colombo declined significantly versus 2009.
Uneven run blocking: Although Free's and Gurode's grades provide some highlights in runblocking, the holes the other three left in their blocking performance contributed to an overall uneven performance in the run game.
Average pass protection, at best: The grades for the four linemen to the left of Marc Colombo are all green, but they are also all just barely above average. Add Colombo's grade to the mix and the the Cowboys are ranked 16th in pass blocking by PFF. The screen game, likely born out of the frustration over the O-line's performance, ironically is where the line actually grades out decently.
Penalties remain an issue: According to Stats Inc., the Cowboys linemen were penalized 35 times in 2010. Only the Raiders linemen were penalized more often. That's only down by two penalties versus 2009, where the line still featured Flozell Adams at left tackle. PFF downgrade the Cowboys accordingly, and their cumulative penalty grade is the second worst in the league.
Garrett vs. Phillips
As we did in previous posts, here is where we break down the overall grades by the first and second half of the season:
| 2010 | Doug Free | Kyle Kosier | Andre Gurode | Leonard Davis | Marc Colombo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Games 1-8 |
-1.7 | -0.8 |
2.1 | 1.7 | -16.5 |
| Games 9-16 |
19.6 | 3.0 |
11.1 | 5.0 | -17.6 |
| Change | +21.3 | +3.8 | +9.0 | +3.3 | -1.1 |
Overall, line play improved somewhat in the second half of the season according to the PFF grades. Doug Free clearly came into his own (as a run blocker) in the second half of the season, and Gurode improved as well. Kosier and Davis improved marginally upon an average first half performance, while Marc Colombo's grade remained subterranean any way you look at them.
Free Agency
Any way you look at it, the line needs an upgrade. The clearest need is obviously at right tackle. The Cowboys may opt to keep Colombo around for another year if for no other reason than to provide cheap insurance at right tackle, but based on what we've seen in 2010, it's unlikely that he'll start next season. Sam Young and perhaps even Robert Brewster will likely be an upgrade over Colombo, but that's not saying much.
The Cowboys could always try to shore up the right tackle spot via free agency, but their options might be very limited there. Below is a list of right tackle free agents and their PFF grades in 2010 and 2009. Slim pickings.
| NFL rank | Player | Age | Team | Snaps | 2010 Overall Grade | Pass Bock | Screen Block | Run Block | Penalty | '09 Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Marshal Yanda | 26 | BLT | 1021 | 17.4 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 10.6 | 2.1 | -3.3 |
| 4 | Tyson Clabo | 29 | ATL | 1153 | 10.8 | 5 | 0 | -0.4 | 6.2 | 6.6 |
| - - | Ryan O'Callaghan | 27 | KC | 159 | 4.9 | 2.2 | -0.5 | 2.2 | 1 | -15.1 |
| 8 | Sean Locklear | 29 | SEA | 997 | 2 | 11 | 0 | -8.1 | -0.9 | -1.2 |
| 11 | Ryan Harris | 25 | DEN | 668 | -0.9 | 0.6 | 3 | -4 | -0.5 | -1.2 |
| 18 | Langston Walker | 31 | OAK | 995 | -3.6 | -14.7 | 0 | 12 | -0.9 | -1.8 |
| - - | Corey Hilliard | 25 | DET | 271 | -4.4 | -2.5 | 1 | 0 | -2.9 | - - |
| 24 | Jeromey Clary | 27 | SD | 1104 | -12.6 | -8.9 | 0.5 | -5.4 | 1.2 | 5.6 |
| 26 | Stephon Heyer | 27 | WAS | 384 | -13.4 | -8.3 | 0.5 | -1 | -4.6 | -19.0 |
| 27 | Wayne Hunter | 29 | NYJ | 361 | -13.4 | -8.9 | 0 | -0.7 | -3.8 | -4.4 |
Obviously, this table excludes the left tackle free agents, as I don't think it's realistic to expect the Cowboys to pay left tackle money for a right tackle. Barring a surprise free agent pickup the Cowboys will be best served at right tackle if they find a starter caliber player in the early rounds of the draft.
The situation at guard looks much more promising in free agency, and there are good and much cheaper alternatives to Logan Mankins and Carl Nicks around:
| NFL rank | Player | Age | Team | Snaps | 2010 Overall Grade | Pass Bock | Screen Block | Run Block | Penalty | '09 Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carl Nicks (RFA) | 25 | NO | 1126 | 26.2 | 6.3 | -0.5 | 20.2 | 0.2 | 24.9 |
| 4 | Logan Mankins | 28 | NE | 544 | 15.8 | 4 | 0.5 | 10.3 | 1 | 22.6 |
| 6 | Harvey Dahl | 29 | ATL | 1171 | 14.4 | 7.1 | 1.5 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 6 |
| 12 | Justin Blalock | 27 | ATL | 1171 | 9.4 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 5.5 | -7.7 |
| 14 | Mike Brisiel | 27 | HST | 510 | 9.1 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 17 | Richie Incognito | 27 | MIA | 954 | 6.5 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 2.8 |
| - - | Evan Mathis | 29 | CIN | 114 | 6.2 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 17 |
| 23 | Chris Chester | 28 | BLT | 880 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 2.5 | -2.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 |
| 26 | Kyle Kosier | 32 | DAL | 849 | 2.2 | 4.2 | 1 | -3.9 | 0.9 | 15.9 |
| 33 | Will Montgomery | 27 | WAS | 429 | -1.2 | 2.8 | 0 | -3.9 | -0.1 | -3.8 |
Some of these players are truly flying under the radar. A simple search of "Mankins" in the 31 non-Patriots SB Nation blogs delivers 3,679 hits, searching for "Blalock" in the 31 non-Falcons SB Nation blogs gets you only 370 hits.
What the Cowboys do at guard also depends a lot on what they do with Kyle Kosier, who is a free agent heading into next season. Do they re-sign him and look to phase out Leonard Davis? Keep in mind that Kosier helps out as a signal caller on the line and as such has a higher value than Davis. Also, if the maxim holds true that you should value pass blocking over run blocking, Kosier grades out as the third best available pass blocker among the free agents in the table above. Can he deliver for another year or two?
There are solid guards to be had in free agency, but the solution for the Cowboys at right tackle may need to involve a high draft pick. Unless the answer is already on the roster. But would you bet your QB's health on that? Again?
45 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Odd
The OL wasn’t as bad as I thought it was, Colombo is just a well below replacement level player. This solidifies my position of sign Asomugha and draft secondary or the best DL available in the first. Sounds like even an average player would be quite an upgrade over Colombo. (as if we needed stats to prove that)
My favorite team is 1171!!
The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Feb 1, 2011 11:45 PM CST up reply actions
I saw that Marshal Yanda's age was BLT
I thought maybe that meant he was beyond his salad days.
ha ha ha, apologies gentlemen, fixed.
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 2, 2011 2:18 AM CST up reply actions
I would
Only sign Kosier if we couldn’t get Blalock on the cheap.
Carl Nicks looks good
but i wonder what new orleans would want in exchange for him. I would get rid of leonard davis and replace him with Nicks.
Yanda graded out
the same as Free. Would be a good bookend.
I think Yanda has played both guard and tackle
assuming the cba is finished before the draft:
If we could sign Yanda to play either RT or LG it frees us to select the best OL left in the 2nd…..G or T
I wonder how difficult it will be for Ravens to retain him.
by death of the cool on Feb 1, 2011 8:56 PM CST up reply actions
They're bad. Inconsistent, penalty-prone, blah, blah, blah. I can't even keep
repeating it anymore. I’m good with Colombo as backup, but they’re got to address the right side of that line. First-round pick goes to the D, but after that, deal with the O line.
Dude OCC you are on fire. This is your fourth post today.
As for the post, I think we certainly could stand to address the O-line through FA. The problem I have is that if the CBA doesn’t get done then free agency will go on after the draft. As such, I don’t know if I would feel comfortable not finding our next RT in the draft since we wouldn’t know when or even if there would be a significant FA period. There would also be uncertainty about what the FA structure would really look like. So, while there are some options out there to address this O-line, I think the draft has to be the main focus for now barring the CBA getting signed anytime soon.
And, even if the CBA is signed in time, I think that for RT the draft might be the best place to look. I am tired of creating a patchwork offensive line through FA and not investing actual draft picks into an extremely important unit. If we could do look for that RT in the draft there very well may be some growing pains, but it would be worth it in my opinion to add a bookend alongside Free that we can keep for many years going forward. That, to me is preferable to grabbing a guy like Tyson Clabo only to find out that he is declining three years from now. I would much rather grab a guard in FA than a tackle.
Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels
+1
We need long term solutions and FA signings are just patchwork. And the fact that FA is after the draft means most contracts will be more expensive than normal since it will be the last chance for teams to fill holes and the FA and their agents will take advantage of it during contract negotiations.
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
The situation at guard looks much more promising in free agency, and there are good and much cheaper alternatives
I would disagree with your conclusion. You got Mankins, Nicks, Dahl then you’ve got 2 guys, Blalock and Brisiel who graded modestly better than Leonard Davis .. who I hear non-stop whining about. And then you look at their 2009 grades and they were all worse than the 2010 vintage of Davis.
It is a good reality check. A lot of teams are dealing similarly limited OL.
You know what would be really helpful. Can you give the max, median, and min grades. Is the median Leonard Davis / Richie Incognito?
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 1, 2011 10:25 PM CST reply actions
Don't forget...
Atlanta’s completely fscked on how they’re using Blalock, LG rather than RT, maybe RG. Plus he’s made up for some shoddy play on his LT’s part. We keep Kosier for the line-calls, throw Blalock back to his natural RT position.
Point After (rule change): You score, you kick. Debate welcomed.
Max and min
82 ranked guards, median -3.1, max +26.2, min -29.0
78 ranked tackles, median -8.0, max +24.6, min -41.2
Guards are ‘more promising’ simply because I found eight free agents with a positive grade versus only four right tackles with a positive grade.
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 2, 2011 2:32 AM CST up reply actions
Wow I didn't know Davis rated better player than Kosier
It seems like opposing defenses attacked Bigg with all kinds of stunts, beat him off the line, etc. Is it possible that with a competent RT and practicing in pads that Davis might play better for the whole season.
I’ve been an advovcate of not resigning Kosier because it would be a bad business decision to resign a 33 year old, injury prone LG. But if cutting Colombo is also a given, do we have enough room to cut Davis as well? He is still under contract and with the possibility of a shortend training camp, either Davis or Holland will have to start if some rookie guard isn’t ready to go.
Looking at the guard free agents, Nicks and Mankins seem too expensive. Nicks is only 25 but is a RFA. I don’t know what will happen with the CBA but I wouldn’t want to give up a draft pick and a boatload of money to sign him. The only other options that would be a surefire upgrade from Davis and Kosier, would be Blaylock or maybe Brisel but he’s worked in a ZBS. Everyone else is on the list is either too old or wouldn’t be a clear cut upgrade. Really if we gon’t land Nicks, Mankins, or Blayock; I would be fine letting Davis, Holland, and some rookie guard battle for the guard spots. But we better get a RT who can start right away.
The key on Kosier...
Is having someone for the signal calling. If not him, who?
Point After (rule change): You score, you kick. Debate welcomed.
That is my only concern with losing him
Maybe we draft a guy lik Wisniewski who can step in day 1 and start at G or C if Gurode switches over to RG. If we spent the farm on Mankins he would also be willing.
The good thing is that the draft is before FA, so you can figure out if you have someone to replace him or not.
by starmesh23 on Feb 2, 2011 12:28 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Is Atlantas' entire line heading for FA?
Quite a pickle for them.
I started out with nothing and still have most of it left
He did get bounced around a bit
Played well both ways, not sure which graded better. Plus with Ngata deal looming large, tough to see the Ravens hanging onto both. Not really their style to date.
If, and it’s a huge if, we could re-sign Free, one-year Kosier, grab Yanda and Blalock, draft Wisniewski (smart C, potential to handle line-calls after Kosier?), use the rest of draft for DL/ILB/FS (though I’d like to snag a Weddle/Huff in FA). It’s just too much on FA, it strains the dollars and sense credibility, but I’d be grinning ear-to-ear. Ahhh, dreams…
Point After (rule change): You score, you kick. Debate welcomed.
The pass blocking numbers are worse than they appear
How much of the Cowboys pass game was quick drops, underneath stuff, and check-downs this year?
The PFF numbers can only evaluate what the Cowboyd did. It was clear all year that Garrett was scared to death of his O-line in passing situations and called plays to mitigate the risk. Then, when Kitna came in all of his passes were underneath.
So they graded out barely positive in pass blocking, even though all season long Garrett called O-line-friendly pass plays.
That sucks.
The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Feb 1, 2011 11:43 PM CST reply actions
I have heard this argument many times
But if the short, quick passing game works well with poor pass-blocking, what’s the problem?
It didn't work
25 swing passes to Felix Jones and Miles Austin targeted 3 times a game?
Where were the great double-moves by Miles this year? Kitna had thrown the ball before he’d even made his first move.
The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Feb 2, 2011 12:05 PM CST up reply actions
And because those drives stall too often
When you watch the playoffs, all of those teams can support some number of 5 and 7 step drops. If Romo or Kitna took more than 3, they got dropped. The numbers don’t reflect the fact that Garrett and Kitna had to work around the team’s weakest unit.
Don't believe everything you think.
Just watch New England any time in the last 8 years
Tom Brady stands tall in the pocket, he doesn’t move. He just stands there bouncing on his toes going through his reads. When’s the last time you’ve seen Tony have 5 seconds to stand in one spot and go through his reads? Try to envision one play. Can you even think of one play?
Imagine what Romo could do if he wasn’t having to move around in the pocket because his O-linemen are getting pushed back into his face or rolling out of it because some DE came free every play.
The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Feb 2, 2011 5:19 PM CST up reply actions
It didn’t work
Tony Romo AYPA – 5.7 (9th in league), Jon Kitna 5.1 (16th in league).
And lets clear one thing up, I’m not saying we wouldn’t be better with improved o-line play, I think if we had the Jets o-line this past year our offense would’ve been unstoppable, but our passing O was still good.
BED,
I usually agree with you but look at this list? Dallas’s line is average. Will Montgomery is an average NFL guard. That’s what NFL teams have to deal with. You can’t have an all-pro at every OL slot. Do you really think Will Montgomery would be an upgrade over the Davis/Kossier?
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Feb 2, 2011 9:21 AM CST up reply actions
No, I don't want Montgomery
But Montgomery is at the same level Kosier was this year. I have no problem bringing Kosier back.
Leonard Davis is the problem and he’s B-A-D. I think he’s much worse than the PFF numbers indicate. Replacing Davis with Harvey Dahl would be an amazing upgrade.
And, of course, we all agree that right tackle needs a new face next year. Looking at these free agents I say this absolutely has to be a draft pick. Fingers crossed for Carimi.
The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Feb 2, 2011 12:11 PM CST up reply actions
They're average I think
because Garrett had to adjust his scheme to mitigate poor pass blocking. He probably gambled a little when Romo was healthy that he could run deeper patterns in the hope that Romo would escape and make the play anyway. Kitna can run decently, but he’s not nifty in the pocket and needed a quicker play to be able to make any wort of play.
And I would add… average teams don’t win championships and most don’t make the playoffs (Seattle being the galring exception).
Don't believe everything you think.
+1
Exactly
And does anyone think the old guys can play “just as well” next year?
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Don't forget the Random Variable
Every pitcher has to have multiple pitches or by the 3rd inning they’ll be lighting him up and our O-line was like a batter who could only hit a change of pace pitch. What we saw in games might only have shown a few guys getting through but if you are a Qb and the only consistency you are seeing are leaks then you have to start to bail or check down.
The second problem of an Inconsistent line (besides a jumpy Qb and short passes) is the mentality that the defense has that they are soft….this leads to them being beaten on Running downs as well and No Toughness at the Goal Line.
3rd problem is that Linebackers start creeping closer to the line of scrimmage because passes are only short, and play action is defeated by the pass rush not the drop of the backers.
So the numbers show one story but remember what we all saw, our line was randomly porous and there was nothing we could do with consistency (remember the standard we are looking for is when a team knows you are going to do something, like run it, and you still do it successfully like the 90’s Cowboys line). So Staff please recall what you know to be true and Please go into the Draft using your eyes (and film on the player) and not the Combine numbers to try and determine if our next O-lineman is qualified or not (Solder good feet? maybe but film shows he is a constant leaner and fast ends will consistently make him and our Qb pay)
Does a potential return of Jared Gaither
affect the Yanda situation? Assuming Gaither is healthy and Balt is sticking with Oher at LT.
I will take
Cheser, Nicks and clabo please :)
Sign Free!
Get it done. Draft OT and get Baylock too. Romo would sleep better at night.
Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules.

by 























