Cowboys O-Line: Successful Against The Splash Play?
In the three previous posts on the O-line, we looked at the run blocking game in detail and examined sacks allowed. Today in part four of this mini-series we take the analysis a step further and look how the individual players on the Cowboys O-line held up in pass protection.
The basic idea behind pass protection is to keep the opposing defenses from making what NFL scouts call splash plays - plays that turn games around. Splash plays include sacks, QB hits, QB pressures and penalties. The fewer of these an offensive lineman allows, the better.
After the break we look at how the Cowboys linemen compared against the NFL average in 2010 and how many splash plays they gave up.
Before we start comparing sacks, hits and pressures among players along the O-Line, it's important to understand that pressure is not distributed evenly along the line. Tackles obviously give up more pressure than the interior linemen. But even if you had the average sacks given up by a left tackle, you wouldn't necessarily be able to compare one left tackle to the other because one guy may have played 300 pass blocking snaps, while the other guy played 600 snaps.
Example: Kyle Kosier gave up 14 QB pressures according to Pro Football Focus (PFF), while Leonard Davis gave up 16. If you're a proponent of volume stats, that would give Kosier a slight edge. But Kosier only played on 495 pass blocking snaps, while Davis was on the field for 649. The average NFL lineman played on about 600 pass blocking snaps in 2010, so if we adjust for that, Kosier's pressures-allowed-per-600 snaps climbs to 17.0, while Davis's total declines slightly to 14.8.
I performed a similar 'normalization' to 600 pass blocking snaps for all NFL O-linemen who played at least 25% of their teams' total snaps. This is what the average NFL line gave up in total pressure in 2010, based on 600 pass blocking snaps:
| NFL Avg. 2010 | LT | LG | C | RG | RT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacks | 6.2 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 6.0 |
| QB Hits | 7.5 | 4.3 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 6.2 |
| QB Pressures | 37.9 | 18.9 | 12.5 | 18.7 | 30.8 |
The pressure is bigger from the outside, no big surprise there, but I was a little surprised to see that the pressure from the left is about on par with the pressure from the right. I always thought that O-lines and QBs were more susceptible to pressure from the left- or blind side. Perhaps there are more left-handed QBs in the league who balance that out, perhaps it's that teams tend to put their best athletes at LT to counter this threat, perhaps my assumption was simply wrong - no matter, it's the way it is.
Now that we've established the baseline, or 'average' for these splash plays, let's have a look at how the Cowboys linemen compare. Note on the color scheme: red is worse than the NFL average at the position, yellow is up to 20% better than the NFL average while green is more than 20% better than the NFL average at the position.
| Free | Kosier | Gurode | Davis | Colombo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacks | 4.5 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 6.8 |
| QB Hits | 6.3 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 10.7 |
| QB Pressures | 18.9 | 17.0 | 7.2 | 14.8 | 39.0 |
As you look at the table, you'll probably find that you intuitively agree with most of the color scheme. Marc Colombo simply had a very bad year, in almost all aspects of his game. And while Davis graded out as an average run blocker as we've seen in previous posts, he looks to have been uneven pass protection, giving up an above average amount of sacks, but allowing only very few QB hits beyond that. Gurode was solidly above average, Kosier gave up a little too many pressures but was exceptionally good in not letting defenders touch the QB - think about it this way, Kosiers guy got to the QB only three times last season, once for a sack, twice for a hit. Doug Free played great against the run, but still has a way to go as a pass blocker.
In a recent chat with The Ticket's Bob Sturm, Sam Monson from PFF observed:
We love Free as a run blocker, but teams pay left tackles to protect the QB's blind side, and Free was our 15th ranked OT in pass protection, allowing the QB to be knocked to the ground 12 times on the season. I guess it depends how much they think he can improve in that area (still being a relatively young starter), and how much they covet his run blocking.
It's probably too late to move Free back to the right side, or at least to pay him like a right tackle. He'll want left tackle money, and he'll get it from the Cowboys - or some other team. But Free still has some work to do to become a great left tackle, especially in pass protection.
Pass Blocking Productivity
Pass Blocking Productivity (PBP) is a fairly straightforward metric developed by Khaled Elsayed of Pro Football Focus that combines sacks, hits and pressures allowed into one simple number. In Khaled's own words:
We added up all the sacks, hits and pressures an offensive lineman gave up (hits and pressures are valued at 0.75 the value of a sack in accordance with our gradings). We then divide this number by the total number of snaps in pass protection before multiplying by 100 to get a solid number. A little something like this:
([Sack + Hit(0.75) + Pressure(0.75)]/Snaps Pass Blocking) x 100 = Pass Blocking Productivity Rating
Using this formula, here's how the Cowboys linemen performed in 2010:
| Position | Player | Pass Block Snaps | Sacks | QB Hits | QB Pressures | PBP | NFL Rank | Players at Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT | Doug Free | 668 | 5 | 7 | 21 | 2.4 | 8 | 39 |
| LG | Kyle Kosier |
495 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 1.5 | 8 | 41 |
| C | Andre Gurode | 668 |
1 | 2 | 8 | 0.8 | 5 | 34 |
| RG | Leonard Davis |
649 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 1.6 | 10 | 40 |
| RT | Marc Colombo |
615 | 7 | 11 | 40 | 4.4 | 32 | 37 |
[Note on the data. NFL rank: among players at each position (LT, LG, C, RG, RT) with > 25% snaps for their team. Players at position: number of players at position with > 25% snaps for their team. Pass block snaps: number of times the player stayed in to block a pass rusher, includes sacks and penalties.]
In a previous post we saw that when measured purely by sacks allowed, the Cowboys were ranked 11th in the league last year with 31 total sacks allowed. PFF credit the Cowboys total O-Line with 20 sacks (ranked 13th), 25 QB hits (15th) and 107 QB pressures (14th). These measures seem to confirm that the Cowboys had an average to slightly above line in terms of the volume stats.
But the Cowboys linemen were also on the field for a combined total of 3,340 pass blocking snaps, the 8th most in the league. Using the pass blocking productivity formula, with these numbers, the Cowboys O-line gets a PBP value of 3.56, the 7th best value in the league.
Now consider that in the table above, Marc Colombo alone is responsible for 41% of the pass blocking pressure given up by the line. From a purely quantitative point of view, this doesn't leave the remaining four linemen with a lot of pass blocking pressure given up between them. Accordingly, from a pure quantitative point of view, they all end up in the top ten in their respective position groups as measured by PBP.
Shocked? You shouldn't be. The Cowboys racked up the 6th most passing yards in the league last year with 4,042 yards, the third highest total in franchise history - with a 38 year old backup QB under center for the majority of the season. You can think what you want about the Cowboys O-Line, but in terms of splash plays allowed, the line as a whole was better than the NFL average, despite Marc Colombo.
Of course, what these numbers do not show is the quality of pressures or splash plays allowed, i.e. was a sack a coverage sack or was it a one-on-one sack where the lineman was beaten like a rented mule? In the next and final post in this O-line series, well look at the PFF grades for the Cowboys linemen. The PFF grades incorporate exactly those qualitative aspects of the pass protection performance that some may feel are missing in this quantitative assessment.
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Man....
Romo gets bashed by being called Homo, and now you put up that pick. Not helping his cause. LMAO
Be a Angel Fan till I die... The only good team to come out of Texas is my Dallas Cowboys Baby
lmfao
they call romo a homo because it rhymes
Romo gets MAD puss man
seriously that dude is the farthest thing from a rainbow, now Martellus Bennett thats a WHOLE other topic
I think Roy Williams likes men too, he creeps me out
Dez should of punched him
by Archie Barberio on Feb 1, 2011 12:31 PM CST up reply actions
True
But i can see our Haters photo shopping this picture now. lol
Be a Angel Fan till I die... The only good team to come out of Texas is my Dallas Cowboys Baby
this is why Dallas needs to draft an LT....
It’s probably too late to move Free back to the right side, or at least to pay him like a right tackle. He’ll want left tackle money, and he’ll get it from the Cowboys – or some other team. But Free still has some work to do to become a great left tackle, especially in pass protection.
Now I am not saying that a Rookie will come in and beat out Free, BUt I would put a clause in his contract that states something along these lines….“All money amounts are decreased by 20% if Said player(Doug Free) does not maintain his current position at Starting LT….this clause is activated only if said Player is healthy and loses his position.”
this would be a clause that would allow Dallas to “be protected” in case Free would get beat out by another player for the LT spot….
formerly I draft the Cowboys!!!
Yes...I am Ironman....seriously my last name is ironman in German
Knowledge and Skill overcome superstition and Luck-Dawn Patrol
by I am Ironman!!! on Feb 1, 2011 11:39 AM CST reply actions
I am surprised by Davis's numbers
I thought both he and Colombo were bad in Passing plays…looks like he grades out much better than Colombo..
well Davis rebounded after he was benched during the Titans game
Davis was having a really bad reason & his time is getting short but we need a new Tackle asap.
i’m with Ironman on his contract but the OT we draft or sign this season needs to have the potential to play LT. its no need in over paying for Free if he can’t hold up against the pass rush.
Every team has a great gameplan until they get Punched in the Mouth! Garrett & Ryan working as a team should create a physical environment at Valley Ranch that shows up on gameday.
Reports of Davis' demise are exaggerated
he’s a lazy player. I think the pads on Wed helped him a bunch. Seems like his play picked up around then.
One tackle away from having a ridiculously potent offense…
Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK
Being next to Colombo can make him look worse too
Just like the bad safeties make the CB’s look worse…..
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Feb 1, 2011 7:46 PM CST up reply actions
The reason that a blind side hit matters more than a RT allowed Sack
is because a Blind Side hit will cause a Fumble and a Turnover, and hurt the QB more.
A right tackle sack is a blow the QB can prepare for
are you implying
that we could lose Free?
why is it too late to move him to RT if we draft a OT in the first round who might be a better LT?
by Archie Barberio on Feb 1, 2011 12:25 PM CST reply actions
You do not pay a guy left tackle money and then put him in at right tackle. But Free is a free agent. If the Cowboys don’t pay him like a left tackle, some other team will.
Of course you can pay him like a left tackle, move him to the right and then pay another guy incredible money to play left tackle. That type of Madden 11 team building will get you in trouble with whatever new cap there’ll be really, really quick.
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 1, 2011 1:06 PM CST up reply actions
Indeed it will (Madden 11), especially the way Jerry tends to throw money around
First off, love the analysis OCC, thanks again.
If a Rookie Wage Scale is implimented, then we may have a little more wiggle room to pay some of the older guys?
If Free is performing at a Top 10-15 LT, then what does it hurt to see if he performs and can continue to play well there? He played well last year and if he continues to develop, maybe we have a Top 5 to 8 for some years to come. I would rather put a rookie in at RT, especially if there is any delay to the Season (ie OTAs, TC, etc).
well paying a LT top dollar that isn't getting the job done will get you in trouble also.
its almost like a no win situation
Every team has a great gameplan until they get Punched in the Mouth! Garrett & Ryan working as a team should create a physical environment at Valley Ranch that shows up on gameday.
Understood, but ....
If he isn’t getting the job done, itsn’t it hard for him to demand absolute top dollar?
Also, he has upside, last year was his first full season of play, correct? I know he has been in JGs system a while now and should be understanding it, but he performed well last year and there is nor reason to think he would improve upon that success in the coming years.
i guess it depends on how the organization is run.
the numbers show he doesn’t deserve top dollar at LT & its a huge gamble to just assume he’ll get it done next season. there were a lot of questions about his strength going into the season against the pass rush & the numbers kinda backed up what they thought.
do you think the Patriots, Steelers, Ravens or Packers would over pay on the assumption of something that wasn’t there?
i’m not against Free but its a legit problem that could get ugly now that teams have some film on him.
Every team has a great gameplan until they get Punched in the Mouth! Garrett & Ryan working as a team should create a physical environment at Valley Ranch that shows up on gameday.
one thing
if we lose Free, I will be highly pissed off
the guy is the first offensive lineman we hit on in the draft in over a decade
by Archie Barberio on Feb 1, 2011 3:39 PM CST up reply actions
No, no, no...
Jeez, what do you people need? JG to come out and say “Nix, nada, next” to this move Free to RT silliness?
He’s either LT here in 2011 or gone. If here, it simply doesn’t make sense to shift him to RT, not now. If gone, it’s the other team’s decision.
Point After (rule change): You score, you kick. Debate welcomed.
this is the type of decision that will determine JGs future in Dallas
Every team has a great gameplan until they get Punched in the Mouth! Garrett & Ryan working as a team should create a physical environment at Valley Ranch that shows up on gameday.
yep. As it should. For better or worse.
Point After (rule change): You score, you kick. Debate welcomed.
OCC
I’m kind of confused for your rankings on Free, because your stats show (if I’m reading them correctly), that he graded out better than average in all three categories. One was up to 20% above the average, while two were over 20% above the average, but then you say,
Doug Free played great against the run, but still has a way to go as a pass blocker.
How does that statement fit the statistics shown? Could you explain how that statement fits with the stats shown?
"Wade is no longer the coach." Jason Garrett
Also, I realize I just asked the same question twice. Sorry
"Wade is no longer the coach." Jason Garrett
by k2spitfire88 on Feb 1, 2011 12:38 PM CST up reply actions
Sure. Doug Free did an exceptional job in run blocking, especially in the second half of the season. We saw that in previous run blocking posts.
The “above 20%” table you’re referring to simply shows how many sacks, hurries and pressures he gave up, and yes all his numbers there are above average. So he’s good, no question. But these numbers don’t account for the type of pressure he gave up, i.e did he simply whiff on a block or not. The answer to that can be found in his pass blocking grade, which we’ll look at tomorrow. Free’s pass blocking grade is +2.6, slightly above average and ranked 15th among all tackles.
If we want to consider Free an exceptional tackle, he’ll have to get a better grade in pass blocking. You pay left tackle money to guys who can protect the QB, not guys who can only run block really well.
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 1, 2011 1:02 PM CST up reply actions
Ahh. That makes sense.
Thanks. I think we can expect him to improve next year, but I do see what you’re saying now.
"Wade is no longer the coach." Jason Garrett
OCC, is there PFF breakdown on...
Blalock’s numbers as Guard and Tackle, maybe broken down left and right side, if any? Know the Falcons shifting him to LG from his college RT and everything involved there (linemates, positional stuff, etc) impacts it all, but didn’t they play him G/T some this year? So maybe Free/Kosier/Gurode/Davis/Blalock? GIves some leeway in getting/grooming replacements for Kosier’s line-calling, Gurode at C, Davis’ replacement, maybe another year to get the go-forward pieces in place longer-term?
Plus, then it comes down to cash, options (draft and otherwise), but maybe there’s some breathing room and all this OL high talk in a non-OL quality year can make way for picking up the lunchbox workhorse guys in ways that seem more worthwhile in terms of pick postion, grabbing proven developed guys from other rosters, etc. Keeps from throwing rooks against the Freeney’s, gives development time on youngsters, etc. Maybe we can live with Davis one more year? Though then this (2011-2013: $6 million) comes into play and is it $2mil/yr or $6mil each year?
Know he got crucified in 2008/2009 stat-wise on left side (these are supposedly PFF numbers, but I’ve no access):
2008
Overall Comprehensive Ranking – 70th (out of 74; -23.0 Rating)
Pass Block – 55th (-5.0 Rating)
Run Block – 71st (-11.5 Rating)
2009
Overall Comprehensive Ranking – 73rd (out of 84; -13.0 Rating)
Pass Block – 44th (+1.4 Rating)
Run Block – 74th (-9.3 Rating)
Penalties – 70th (-5.0 Rating)
Sacks – Tied 37th (2)
QB Hits – 84th (Dead Last; 13)
QB Pressures – Tied 50th (12)
But wondering about 2010 numbers and if there’s breakdown both side and positionally? Because in some ways Atlanta misused him plain and simple, just as we did Barber. What idiot isn’t playing this guy RT, for cr!pes sake?
Point After (rule change): You score, you kick. Debate welcomed.
We'll look at Blalock and other options tomorrow
Some of those numbers are right, some are wrong.
2008: Ranked 70th, OAR: -18.1, pass bl. -5.0 run bl. -11.5
2009: 70th, OAR: -7.7, pb. +1.4, rb: -9.4
2010: 12th, OAR: +9.4, pb: +1.1, rb: +1.3
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 1, 2011 2:02 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks, chief
Appreciate the corrections. They were pulled form another site that said they were PFF but when I tried to check I couldn’t access what I’d needed to. Sorry to bother you.
Point After (rule change): You score, you kick. Debate welcomed.
I think Davis' sack numbers
Could be one of the reasons so many people think he’s horrible, when in fact he gives up below average hits and pressures. Btw wtf do they mean on tv when in a game they list “pressures, hits, knockdowns, sacks”. Wtf is the difference between a hit and a knockdown???
I think picking up a blitz is a way bigger culprit than individual blocking. They looked down right lost on some plays. When you have someone untouched and levels your qb then something is seriously wrong.
"On a journey to anywhere you can draw your own map."
Flozell Adams
Out of curiosity, how did Flozell rank at RT this year? Maybe we should have released Columbo and moved Flozell over to RT ourselves.
Flo was graded with -15.2 and ranked 60th out of 78 tackles.
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 2, 2011 3:40 AM CST up reply actions
The message is, get off Gurode's back
The guy’s not perfect, but too much complaining about him around here.
And, he actually learned to do a shotgun snap this year!
Just as FAdams was underappreciated for many years, we should realize a lot of teams are worse off at Center.
LG and RG, those are the problems-and Kosier’s age.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
yehk, that age thing won't go away, will it?
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Feb 2, 2011 9:17 PM CST up reply actions

by 


























