NFL 2011 Salary Cap: Cowboys Currently Lead League
I'm getting really tired of prefacing every post with the standard disclaimer "Assuming the new CBA is done in time, or at all". Regardless, let's assume that the new CBA is done sometime during the next two or three months and will have some kind of salary cap. In 2009, the final capped year under the current CBA, the cap was $128 million per team, with a cap floor of $112 million. Making a guess as to what the cap could be in 2011 is essentially a shot in the dark, as this is a major point of contention in the current labor talks.
Under the current CBA, the percentage of owner revenues on which the salary cap has been based has been essentially constant – 57% of total revenues in 2006 and 2007, and 57.5% of total revenues in 2008 and 2009. That percentage will come down - or there will be no football in 2011. The only question is how can you package it in such a way that both sides save face.
What we do know is how much money every NFL team has committed for 2011, thus potentially laying out the boundaries for a new salary cap structure. ESPN.com's Pat Yasinskas has pulled together a list with how much each team currently has committed for the 2011 season. No big surprise that the Cowboys lead the list with $136.6 million.
Those $136.6 million are only for players currently under contract for the 2011 season. They do not include the draft picks that'll come in April, they do not include any potential free agent signings, but they also do not include any contracts that the Cowboys might decide to terminate.
Here's a breakdown of the committed salaries for each NFC East:
Dallas Cowboys: $136.6 million
New York Giants: $126.3 million
Washington Redskins: $115.2 million
Philadelphia Eagles: $80.8 million
For the numerologists among us, here is a salary cap list from March 14th, 2010. These figures already contain some large free agency contracts, but not all of them. The Cowboys also topped that list with $ 153 million. Yet another cap list from September shows the full 2010 salary cap salaries by team. The Cowboys spent $ 166.5 million last year, second only to the Washington Redskins with $ 178.2 million.
If we assume that a cap will be implemented in 2011 at or around the 2009 levels ($128 million ceiling, $112 million floor), an interesting dynamic emerges from the 2011 committed salary figures: Only three teams currently are above the 2009 cap (Cowboys: $M 136.6, Packers: $M 129.8 and Jets: $M 128.5), while 21(!!!) teams are below the 2009 salary cap floor. The Buccaneers have the lowest current salary commitment for 2011 with $M 59.7. There is a lesson in there somewhere about the Bucs finishing 10-6 while the Cowboys finished 6-10, but that's for another time.
Of course, the missing rookie and free agent salaries distort the numbers somewhat, but it seems clear that some teams will struggle to meet whatever salary floor is implemented in 2011, while other teams like the Cowboys may have to get creative to meet any future cap requirements.
It also does not bode well for some veteran Cowboys starters whose 2011 base salaries may be just a little too high for comfort for the Cowboys.
Josh Ellis from the mothership just published this hitlist of candidates for "addition by subtraction":
In no particular order there are decisions to be made on Roy Williams, Keith Brooking, Leonard Davis, Marion Barber, Terence Newman, Bradie James and Marc Colombo. With all of them it could be argued that pay hasn't met performance, or that the Cowboys can only move forward by letting go and improving with younger replacements.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I thought we were closer to 120..
I hope this guy is wrong
The problem with this team is....
Jerry hangs onto aging or non producing players too long. Newman and MB3 shouldve been cut last season when there was no cap ramifications. This is why the Patriots, Steelers and other teams consistanly have success. I cant see Newman or MB3 on this team for what they bring.
Not only that but...
he’s to generous too soon and hands out big contracts for one decent year of production (Barber, Hamlin) when he could have just franchised or in Barber’s case made them play under a one year 1st or 2nd round tender.
I think alot of fat is going to be cut very soon....
Newman, MB3, Spears, Brookings all gone I believe….
we could have had
Micheal Turner for the same price as MBIII. One has been highly productive and one has gone downhill in a hurry.
by Cowick22 on Feb 8, 2011 9:20 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Don't forget
Miles Austin had a base salary of like $17 million in 2011 as the Jones’ took advantage of the uncapped year to create a sort of faux “signing bonus”. He will only count for 1.5 million next season. That 15.5 million dollar difference alone gets us under the cap (assuming it goes back to its usual size under the new CBA), and with cutting the bigger salaries of some of the players mentioned, we should have enough to make a few moves in free agency. I’m looking now for a story to validate this.
I ran into a group of men trying to take an old lady's purse and decided it was my duty to help out. She was a tough old broad, but in the end we got her purse.
LINK
I ran into a group of men trying to take an old lady's purse and decided it was my duty to help out. She was a tough old broad, but in the end we got her purse.
that didnt work, but here's the URL
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/09/11/cowboys-take-full-advantage-of-the-uncapped-year/
I ran into a group of men trying to take an old lady's purse and decided it was my duty to help out. She was a tough old broad, but in the end we got her purse.
LINK
MIles, next time you want to do a link the way you intended, leave the title line blank, type the text in the text area, select the link text, do the link insertion and it’ll come out the way you intended.
Point After (rule change): You score, you kick. Debate welcomed.
Gotcha, thank you my friend
I ran into a group of men trying to take an old lady's purse and decided it was my duty to help out. She was a tough old broad, but in the end we got her purse.
Not sure, but...
9/9/2010: Signed a seven-year, $57.168 million contract. The cap-conscious deal contains $18 million guaranteed — no signing bonus but all of Austin’s whopping $17.078 million first-year base salary. 2011: $8.54 million, 2012: $1.15 million, 2013: $6.732 million, 2014: $5.5 million, 2015: $6.888 million, 2016: $11.38 million, 2017: Free Agent
I read that saying the $17mil’s in 2010 uncapped, with $8.54mil against 2011 and the $1.15mil in 2012.
Aside from that, the figures tend to support the Cowboys being required to do some fancy business fiddling relative to many other teams. And all that’s supposing the information’s correct and complete to begin with.
Point After (rule change): You score, you kick. Debate welcomed.
You're certainly right
I mixed up the 2011 and 2012 figures in my head. Still, a drop in salary from 17 to 8.5 million is a savings of 8.5 million for next years cap, and the huge number for 2010 still helps to clear up that the high salary number for this year was part of a plan.
I ran into a group of men trying to take an old lady's purse and decided it was my duty to help out. She was a tough old broad, but in the end we got her purse.
Oh yeah, there's a plan there, rhyme to the reason
Point After (rule change): You score, you kick. Debate welcomed.
I wonder if in this negotiation
will JJ get the right to cut players without impacting the next salary cap?
@AustonianAggie
I actually asked the same question to Bob Sturm from DMN on a live chat and he said it would have to be done before the last game (Eagles) to not count towards the 2011 CAP.
by Nate Trumble on Feb 8, 2011 12:34 PM CST up reply actions
I'm having a hard time buying that Sturm is that well versed on the subject.
Why was it then that absolutely no one on any team was cut?
It would have made all the sense in the world to dump a few players that were going to be cut anyway before being subject to any kind of cap hit.
Also, it seems odd that language pertaining to a future CBA would or even could be included in a prior one. All of it is subject to renegotiation.
I find that list hard to believe
Miles and Roy both received a ton of money last season. I would think their deals returning to normal would give us a lot of help. If things are really as bad as you state, we are in a heap of trouble.
Also, as I’ve stated numerous times, we don’t save much by cutting these guys unless we decide to cut them before the new CBA is implemented. Here is info I wrote about in a previous post.
Columbo was given an extension for 2009-2012 w/ 11.5 mil signing bonus. So we would have to pay about 6 million on that I believe.
Davis 7 year deal, 18 mil signing bonus in 2007. He has 3 years left so that leaves at least 7 mil.
Barber signed a 7 year, 45 mil deal before the 2008 season. 16 mil guaranteed. If we cut him, that is about 9 mil that will be accelerated – compared to something like 6 million he will be paid next year.
Newman – 6 year, 50 mil extension signed before 2008, but I believe it started in 2009. Only a 12 mil signing bonus, but 22 million was guaranteed over the 1st 3 years. So without knowing exact numbers, its probably something like 12 million if we cut him – he 8 mil remaining from the signing bonus + 22/3-the 2 million signing bonus per year. But I have no idea if I’m doing that right.
This seems like a list by a guy who doesn't understand that
Jerry Jones was taking advantage of a year without a salary cap
Proud Bandwagoner of the Binghamton Bearcats!
Tentative First Member of the Disciples of Terry - We're Gonna Terryfy you
signing bonuses cannot be dumped on the books in an uncapped year
you take the signing bonus, divide by the length of the contract, and that charge goes on the cap each year till the contract ends. Which is why Columbo’s, Davis’ and Barber’s contracts are so worrying.
But ridiculous one year salaries do. Which Austin and Roy had. And I’m sure others did too. That may be the case with Newman too.
Ha ha ha
First, you have to pay Vick. Then you can buy some FA’s off the street with the change you have left.
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 8, 2011 1:17 PM CST up reply actions
Alright, so let’s say the Eagles pay Vick something in the ballpark of $14M per (which would be higher than expected)… and then they extend Jackson to something like $8M per…
They’d still be $13M below anyone else in the NFC East. They dumped 10 vets last offseason and are set up beautifully to make a big splash in one of the deepest FA pools ever this year. Yay!
That is, of course, if the new CBA cooperates.
http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/
Sweet.
This will allow me to watch two 30 year old Eagles CBs with huge contracts decline simulataneously as they find out how hard it is to play pass defense without a pass rush.
Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels
by Creasy729 on Feb 8, 2011 1:39 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Haha, let’s have this argument (which I’ll destroy you on) if/when the Eagles actually get Nnamdi.
http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/
30 yr old aging CB....go for it....ha!!
and he is going to want anywhere between 12 and 15 per season….you can have him….
Talk about Money for Nothin'
I’ve yet to see a detailed player list of Cowboys and their Cap impact for 2011 – including amortized bonus that would give us a true Cap impact if they were let go. Archer said in a story later in the season, it is precisely this aspect that is going to make RW so hard to outright release. Unlike the Austin deal that took advantage of the uncapped year. If this is the work of Steven Jones, why didn’t they utilize this earlier?
That said, it would also appear the team would not have much leverage in asking players to re-work their deals
We live life forwards and understand it backwards
Thanks OCC,
I’ve said this in the many "we should Ngata/Mankins/Asomugha" posts. Not going to happen, we need to cut players to get under the likely new cap. Big ticket Free Agents are off the table.
The idea that "the Miles Austin deal and other contracts will come come down because Jerry & Stephen jumped them up for the uncapped year and that will bring our figure down under the cap", I believe is mistaken.
The Cowboys cap figure for 2010 was $166.5 million. Now, when you adjust for those contracts moving into their next year (2011) the Cowboys are, apparently, at $136.6 million. That is the big comedown adjustment right their and we’re still probably over what the new cap will be (about $130 million).
As OCC said that figure doesn’t include money that will be needed for Draft Picks and even more importantly that figure doesn’t include off-contract Cowboys we really want to resign. Doug Free springs to mind and after a strong year at LT he will not be signing for peanuts ($5 – 8 million per season is likely). Add say $6 million for Free to the current salaries and we’re quickly at $142.6 million in salaries for a $130 million cap.
The question we need to know is not if we’ll be over the cap, I think from the info we’ve got that we definitely will be, the real question is can we dump our overpaid "stars" (Barber, Davis, Williams, Colombo etc) without carry-over penalty. I’ve yet to hear any definitive answer on this from a league source (anyone else know?).
Jerry and Stephen went all in for a Super Bowl in 2010 ($166.6 million) and it failed miserably. Now comes the pain. There’s appears to be some major roster adjustments that need to take place.
I've been looking for that penalty info for months.
Austonian has a comment above on it, and my thoughts are below it. We know that rosters were frozen during the postseason, so if players could be cut between now and Mar 4 with no penalty, I would imagine we would be seeing some of them do it.
The best I’ve found on it were a handful of changes that went into place during the uncapped year. Nothing specifically on this though.
I've been looking for that info for months too.
I’ve yet to see any definitive or official word on it though, which is curious. Surely it’s a huge issue, right?
Anyway, if we can’t dump without penalty Dallas is really in some trouble. If we can dump, I expect to see some considerable changes on the roster.
I just found a copy of the CBA to download. I'll keep you informed of what I find.
Could take days though.
There's nothing in the CBA
I already checked. This issue is really between the owners, and has nothing to do with the NFLPA.
The NFLPA, in principle, wants more money for the players. Carrying over salary cap issues into the new CBA will only reduce the pool of money available for the players, therefore the NFLPA is likely to be in favor of “wiping the slate clean” so to speak.
Jerry Jones and Dan Snyder want that as well. They do not want to be encumbered by last year’s and previous year’s mistakes in 2011.
The only people opposed might be the other owners who might feel a need to ‘punish’ the Snyders and Jones’s of the NFL for their salary cap transgressions. After all, the other owners didn’t throw money around like there was no tomorrow.
My guess: the new CBA establishes a new cap, all previous capology issues are set back to zero.
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 9, 2011 12:20 PM CST up reply actions
That's a good point since the cap is an owner thing anyway
However, do you think the PA does not realize how many vets (Roy Williams for example) will be released in that case that normally would not have if the team had to absorb the cap hit?
Jerry is about as dialed in with things like this as he can be, and he has said that there will be a large roster turnover. I can’t see how that will be possible unless he gets the impression that he’ll be able to get out from some of these contracts without cap consequence.
Here’s to hoping anyway…
I have no idea how to trim the roster if we cannot cut without penalty. Its a total mess.
Too many guys were resigned in the last 4 years to long deals/extensions. I’m not sure we’d save money by cutting Columbo/Barber/Davis. I’m fairly sure we’d lose money by cutting Roy.Bradie James, Brooking, Igor..all these guys would fetch us 1-2 mil of cap space each. Its a real mess. And we still have to resign Free.
And as you said, if we can cut players without penalty, this team could have a ridiculous amount of turnover when you consider the poor production per dollar of most of our players. I would cut Barber, COlumbo, Davis and Roy without hesitation. That would actually improve our cap space considerably – by something like 20 million. I’m not sure who else – James is a FA in 2011, Newman is cuttable in 2011. The 1st rounders are making very little money so financially there is no sense in that.
Cant cut both Colombo and Davis...
especially when we dont know whats going on with Kosier. Thats just too much movement in one season. I said it before I think Davis is gone and Colombo stays for one more season. Davis is replaced by Holland, a rookie or FA.

by 






























