BTB NFL Draft Mailbag: Falling Defensive Ends?
Last week, we announced a new feature here at Blogging the Boys: a mailbag wherein our members can send in draft related questions and Drafttek's Longball--as well as our lead writers, on occasion--will answer them in as much detail as he (or we) can muster. We'll be running this feature up until the draft, so be sure to send your questions in to BTBmailbag@gmail.com--making sure to include your username--so you can see your query answered in big, shiny pixels.
For this edition, Longball addresses questions about two of the elite defensive ends who seem to be dropping down boards of late: Robert Quinn and De'Quan Bowers. A month ago, Bowers was the number one prospect on many pundits' boards and many of them were assigning him to Carolina with the first pick, reasoning that he would make an excellent replacement for the recently-departed Julius Peppers; now, he's hovering at the bottom of the top ten. Quinn has tumbled since the Combine, where he performed more poorly than expected, both in the forty (4.7) and the agility drills (a pedestrian 34 inch vertical and ponderous 7.13 in the three-cone drill). In addition, both have questions beyond baseline talent: Quinn missed the 2010 season due to a suspension and has a benign brain tumor; Bowers is still recovering from post-season knee surgery.
So, what might all this mean for the Cowboys? Relax and take a dip in the soothing waters of Longball's vast draft knowledge after the jump...
Max Jacoby: It seems like both Robert Quinn and Da'Quan Bowers are sliding down in the Top 10. In case they get to number 9, how do they fit into the Cowboys 3-4 scheme?
MacarthurTexas: there are some indications that possibly Bowers and Quinn could be there at 9. While pass rusher may not look like a huge need on the surface, Spencer has been very mediocre and you don’t get in the top 10 very often to get impact players. And guys that are big time pass rushers are impact players. I think if one of those guys are there, you take them. Thoughts?
Long Ball: Robert Quinn (6’4", 265) would fit as an OLB34 in the Cowboys’ scheme; however, he would be a "conversion project", as he was strictly a pass-rusher in North Carolina’s scheme, both with his hand in the dirt and from a stand-up position. He would have to be "coached up" as DeMarcus Ware was on pass coverage responsibilities, in the flat, short and intermediate zones. His athleticism seems to indicate that he would be an impact player, but not a complete OLB34 for a year (or two). Now, the follow-up questions are: 1) Do you want to give Rob Ryan a chance to work with Anthony Spencer (a former 1st round choice that has some experience)? And if not, 2) Could Spencer possibly play ILB and be groomed to replace Bradie James?
Da’Quan Bowers (6’3", 280) is the top-rated DE...for the 4-3 alignment! I also have him graded as a DE34, but just in the top ten in that category, and I don’t see him at OLB34. You would want to play him on the weak side of the alignment, but that defeats your purpose as that’s the side Ware plays. I would think you would want your 2 pressure players coming from opposite sides of the formation – and I don’t think you move an All-Pro to the strong side to accommodate a rookie. Don’t get me wrong, he’s an outstanding player but I don’t believe he fits the Cowboys’ needs as much as some of the other prospects.
Rabblerousr: I love draft talk so much that I just had to chime in! I agree completely with Longball on this one: I think Quinn could play 3-4 OLB, and could play the strongside where Spencer currently takes up residence. It wouldn't surprise me to see him high up on Dallas' board...and for them to seek a trade rather than draft him should he be the best player available when it comes time for them to pick. It also wouldn't surprise me to see Bowers on their board--but as a second rounder. I'd have to ask: is Bowers better as a 34DE than the Cameron Heywards and Christian Ballards of the world? I think I'd place him in their midst: not as strong or as much ballast against the run; better pass rush.
That said, the Giants have made hay of late by drafting multiple DEs, and moving them all around the formation to get them on the field and to exploit matchups (Matthias Kiwanuka as an OLB and aligning Justin Tuck inside on passing downs in order to exploit mismatches against opposing OGs come to mind). I wouldn't mind seeing what kind of crazy formations and personnel groupings Rob Ryan's mad scientist brain might be able to devise if he had Ware, Ratliff, Spencer and Quinn/ Bowers to work with.
105 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My question is...
Would Quinn even be an upgrade over Spencer? If you look at his numbers they look awfully Similar to Spencer’s….
Quinn:
Height: 6-4
Weight: 265
40 Yrd Dash: 4.62
20 Yrd Dash: 2.67
10 Yrd Dash: 1.61 225 Lb. Bench Reps: 22
Vertical Jump: 34
Broad Jump: 09’08"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.40
3-Cone Drill: 7.13
Spencer:
Height: 6-2
Weight: 261
40 Yrd Dash: 4.70
20 Yrd Dash: 2.74
10 Yrd Dash: 1.64 225 Lb. Bench Reps: 30
Vertical Jump: 32 1/2
Broad Jump: 09’04"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.43
3-Cone Drill: 7.14
Do we really what to spend the #9 pick on another “Almost” Anthony?
"And one should bear in mind that there is nothing more difficult to execute, nor more dubious of success, nor more dangerous to administer than to introduce a new order to things; for he who introduces it has all those who profit from the old order as his enemies; and he has only lukewarm allies in all those who might profit from the new. This lukewarmness partly stems from fear of their adversaries, who have the law on their side, and partly from the skepticism of men, who do not truly believe in new things unless they have personal experience in them."
Niccolo Machiavelli
by I am Ironman!!! on Mar 28, 2011 10:32 AM CDT reply actions
Great point
The only numbers that jump out are Quinn’s better burst (vertical) and Spencer’s greater strength (8 bench reps is a huge difference). I am right there with Rabble and Longball, I am not a huge fan of either Quinn or Bowers for the Cowboys 3-4. Yes, would players with there ability benefit our Def when used in some inovvative Def formations/rotations? Sure. Is that worth a #9 pick…not in my opinion.
And like ary says below, as does my sig, I think Ryan will help Spencer get to the level we all thought possible towards the end of ’09.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
Spencer for me
just seems like a depth guy to me…a very good depth guy…but not someone that you should count on….
Personally I think that we should be seeing what Spencer would be worth in a trade…Particularly to Houston…
"And one should bear in mind that there is nothing more difficult to execute, nor more dubious of success, nor more dangerous to administer than to introduce a new order to things; for he who introduces it has all those who profit from the old order as his enemies; and he has only lukewarm allies in all those who might profit from the new. This lukewarmness partly stems from fear of their adversaries, who have the law on their side, and partly from the skepticism of men, who do not truly believe in new things unless they have personal experience in them."
Niccolo Machiavelli
by I am Ironman!!! on Mar 28, 2011 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions
Spencer is more than that
He was the top 3-4 OLB in his draft class. He has the potential to be a star for many years. However if he looks like a depth guy this year, He’ll get replaced.
Spencer is a starter in the NFL
You can do a worse than Anthony Spencer. Look at the rosters of the Cardinals, Browns, Bills, Chiefs.
The Chiefs are running 35 year old Matt Vrabel out there at strong-side OLB and he got zero sacks! zero!
So he is a starter on some NFL team. But what do all the above teams have in common? They suck!
Who’s the strong-side OLB for good teams?
Green Bay – Clay Matthews
Pittsburgh – LaMarr Woodley
Baltimore – Terrell Suggs
How does Spencer compare to those guys? Yeah… he’ll never sniff their level of greatness.
So Spencer is a strong OLB candidate for a 6-10 team but leaves a lot to be desired if you want your 3-4 defense to actually make it to the superbowl.
The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Mar 28, 2011 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Only Von Miller would be a clear upgrade for our OLB
And on our roster we also have Victor Butler, who I think should challenge to start
by AustonianAggie on Mar 28, 2011 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions
spencer
I feel Spencer will be much better this coming season with a better scheme and better coverage in the secondary. It would be big mistake to try and convert him to ILB. He’s not as incompetent at rushing the passer as people are making him out to be. He was a fraction late on many plays this season. And if the secondary wasn’t in COMPLETE shambles all year long, he could have ended with 8+ sacks easy.
The question is though
did he not get those sacks because:
A. the Secondary was horrible
B. he just isn’t that good of a Pass rusher
"And one should bear in mind that there is nothing more difficult to execute, nor more dubious of success, nor more dangerous to administer than to introduce a new order to things; for he who introduces it has all those who profit from the old order as his enemies; and he has only lukewarm allies in all those who might profit from the new. This lukewarmness partly stems from fear of their adversaries, who have the law on their side, and partly from the skepticism of men, who do not truly believe in new things unless they have personal experience in them."
Niccolo Machiavelli
by I am Ironman!!! on Mar 28, 2011 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions
A bit of both, but more A than B
There are a few examples, Jags game and Merc. lewis long TD the most evident example, where “Almost” Anthony was a split second away form a sack, but bad coverage in the secondary allowed QB to get rid of the ball instead of eat it and take the sack.
Sure, Anthony Spencer will never have the pass rush ability of Ware, but he is certianly above average and could become solid with a little help from secondary and Ryan (in my opinion).
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
Sure.
I think people are a little hard on Spencer, but Ware was working with the same scheme and secondary behind him.
by BigDumbFace on Mar 28, 2011 10:40 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
The thing is though
Ware is a Beast…. here are his Combine Numbers:
Height: 6-4
Weight: 251
40 Yrd Dash: 4.56
20 Yrd Dash: 2.71
10 Yrd Dash: 1.62 225 Lb. Bench Reps: 27
Vertical Jump: 38 1/2
Broad Jump: 10’02"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.07
3-Cone Drill: 6.85
The only reason Ware fell to #11 was due to the fact that he went to Troy, and not some “big name school” like say Texas A&M…like a certain player in this draft….
"And one should bear in mind that there is nothing more difficult to execute, nor more dubious of success, nor more dangerous to administer than to introduce a new order to things; for he who introduces it has all those who profit from the old order as his enemies; and he has only lukewarm allies in all those who might profit from the new. This lukewarmness partly stems from fear of their adversaries, who have the law on their side, and partly from the skepticism of men, who do not truly believe in new things unless they have personal experience in them."
Niccolo Machiavelli
by I am Ironman!!! on Mar 28, 2011 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions
Of course.
And we can’t expect Spencer to be Ware, but he wasn’t even close.
The point I’m trying to make is that it’s hard to put blame on the secondary or other variables when you have a guy on the other side producing more than anyone in the league.
If we can expect such an improvement from Spencer based on the secondary being fixed up, does that mean we should look for about 25 sacks from Ware next year? …. Or maybe Spencer just isn’t ever going to provide the kind of rush we’re needing.
by BigDumbFace on Mar 28, 2011 11:46 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
the thing there
is that it wasn’t just last season. Spencer has been almost there for a couple of seasons now. He is constantly just a fraction or 2 of a second late. I have seen it time and time again.
By the way LB...
I just put up a new Mock (Where I pretend to be Jason Garrett) i would like to get your Opinion on it if you don’t mind….
"And one should bear in mind that there is nothing more difficult to execute, nor more dubious of success, nor more dangerous to administer than to introduce a new order to things; for he who introduces it has all those who profit from the old order as his enemies; and he has only lukewarm allies in all those who might profit from the new. This lukewarmness partly stems from fear of their adversaries, who have the law on their side, and partly from the skepticism of men, who do not truly believe in new things unless they have personal experience in them."
Niccolo Machiavelli
by I am Ironman!!! on Mar 28, 2011 10:49 AM CDT reply actions
Not bad at all . . .
Left you a comment or two over there — I sure would like to see them take Moffitt instead of Watkins though — better technician and a 3-position player.
From the hometown of Bob Lilly,
as much as I have bashed Spencer
the guy has top tier talent
he has showed it before so I think you have to roll with him another year, especially under Rob Ryan
if he doesnt perform, fine we move on and look for a OLB in next years draft or free agency
I think Spencer is actually going to have a good year, its just a hunch
but again I am tired of waiting for him to breakout
i loved Quinn but he really turned me off during the combine, like what has he been doing for a year? Marvin Austin was in the same situation and showed up in amazing shape, he had a great combine
Quinn really should have blown the doors off the combine but he didnt
then you got questions about motivation, skill level, is he going to develop? does he have a higher ceiling? or is he the next Maybin or Gholston?
I mean you watch this guy on tape and he flys around, but ran a 4.7? had a really weak vertical too
alot of red flags there and I would rather play it safe with the 9th pick, or some what safer
by Archie Barberio on Mar 28, 2011 11:38 AM CDT reply actions
Yes on all points.
We’ve seen Spencer really come on in 2009, then have a poor year last year. Much like Jenkins, if they’ve shown they CAN do it, it’s up to coaching to make sure that they do it consistently…
Again, please trade down and do the RT, then BPA at position of need from there on out…We already have the pieces in place to have a good-great pass rush (maybe a five technique might be my biggest concern)
I also believe strongly that Victor Butler may win the starting job or at least warrant a lot more situational use this year.
I have noticed a new resurgence in Cowboy hating in 2007, which can only mean one thing- We're back.
yeah, at the end
of 2009. Like in the last 2 weeks, then in the post season games. But other than that, Spencer was nonexistent just like this year. He constantly a second or 2 late. Maybe coaching can help, maybe not. However, I am willing to let him stay on for another season unless a very good deal via trade comes along. But, if he can’t turn it on this year under Ryan, it’s time to part ways and find a complimentary pass rusher opposite of Ware.
Contract year
I expect Anthony to have a good year because it’s a contract year for him. But then he’ll dip down into 3-sacks-a-year the following year.
I learned everything I needed to know about almost Anthony in 2010. Ware was getting double-teamed every play, Ratliff was getting double-teamed every play which gave Anthony single-blocking the entire season and all he could do is 3 sacks against starting OTs the entire season. I mean, come on, he was getting taken out of plays by tight ends.
You can do worse than Anthony Spencer. He’s not the worst OLB in the league to say the very least. But he’s nothing special.
The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Mar 28, 2011 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions
you watch this guy on tape and he flys around
Before the Combine, both Quinn and Bowers were top 5 picks. They are sack machines. Either could make the Boys D better, neither are a top need.
Post combine, Von Miller, another college sack machine, has moved into that top 5 range. His numbers are just like Vernon Gholston, but he’s 20 pounds lighter. NFL teams will run all over him.
His numbers leave Gholston in the dust
Gholston ran fast in a straight line and did a lot of bench press reps. But neither of those things have any bearing on how good of a pass rusher you are.
His vertical jump (explosiveness off the line) and short shuttle times (speed moving around an OT in short space) were as pedestrian as Spencer’s. Miller’s numbers are at Ware’s level – amazing numbers. He’s going to be a beast in the NFL and if I ran a 3-4 Panthers team I might just take him #1 overall.
The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Mar 28, 2011 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions
I think some of you guys have too much faith in Spencer. Dude has played opposite D Ware his whole career and had 5 freaking sacks last year. That is terrible.
I think we’re going to regret passing on these two guys.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 12:40 PM CDT reply actions
It's actually worse than that
2 of those 5 sacks came against the Eagles’ version of Sam Young in that Week 17 game where Philly sat all their starters. He was going up against the 4th tackle on their depth chart – litereally their Sam Young.
Take out those 2 and he had only 3 sacks in 15 games against starting NFL offensive tackles. Three!
The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Mar 28, 2011 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions
But 6 sacks the year before with many "Almost" moments
To claim Spencer only has the talent for 3 sacks really ignores how he abused the 2nd string OT of the Eagles, neglects how much he helps against the run, and doesn’t give him the same benefit of the doubt that most of us give to the rest of the defense in a terrible year with bad coaching, motivating, safety play, etc.
Do you think Jenkins, TNew, Ratliff are only as good as they showed last season? Sure, Spencer isn’t Ware, or Clay Matthews, or Suggs, but he is still above average at worst. Like others have said, I think Rob Ryan defense and JG training camp (hopefully) will help Spencer reach his true potential.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
the diff is that Jenkins, TNEW and Rat have actually SHOWN that they can perform at a high level. They are pro bowlers. Spencer has had only flashes.
And I think it’s a losers lament to talk about ‘almost’ moments. This team is full guys that talk about almost. In the mean time, we haven’t won a damn thing.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions
For me it is less faith in Spencer and more
faith that Rob Ryan will get the most out of him…..if we were returning wade as the D Cor this year, i dont think many would be thinking that Spencer could be the player that he was drafted to be….
He who laughs last, thinks slowest
Well.....my days of not taking you seriously have certainly come to a middle
"Pleased to meet you, hope you guess my name"
Totally Agree with Keg & BB Joe.......
We have to look at the new staff thats ready to take on our talented but lose of the mojo DEF. I believe that RR will bring out the best in those that we lost faith in… I dnt know about TNEW but i will trust in Spence to produce #’s this year.
"Texas Stadium has a hole in its roof so God can watch his favorite team play." ~ D.D. Lewis
by California805Cowboy on Mar 28, 2011 7:20 PM CDT up reply actions
but you know, even if Spencer is a beast, when you have an oppotunity to add a great pass rusher, don’t you do it?!
Everyone talks about how great the Giants philosophy is regarding their DL, yet those two guys would be a ‘luxury’ for us? Don’t get that. We need to get Ware help.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 12:48 PM CDT reply actions
How many of those Giants DL rotational guys
Were drafted in the top 10? It’s one thing to add talent that you can use in a rotation, another to draft them at #9 to play situational roles.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
Like Felix Jones?
So many good RBs are there in the later rounds, it was really stupid to use a #1 on a part time RB. We need every down players “on the O-line I hope” with the 1st round pick.
Lock n Load
Any RB in the 1st is debatable
The thing about Felix is he was at least int he 2nd half of the 1st round. On a side note, I am excited to see what he can do as the primary back for a full season – hopefully behind an upgraded OLine.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
With you all the way here
The days of the run game dominating in the NFL are over. The curse of 360 is very real and it’s at least a two back league now. So far the only RB in the past few years taken in the first that was worthy of the pick was Adrian Peterson. I’m leaning towards Chris Johnson too, but I’ll give it another year.
Most if not all were 1st rounders. i still don’t think that’s a reason to not take an impact pass rusher. And who says they will be ‘situational’? As much as the league passes, you need pass rushers. Especially if it ends up Bowers, you have Ware, Bowers, Bowen, Rat and Spencer rushing the passer. I like that.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions
NO way
Quinn would be a starter this season as he learns the OLB position. Bowers could be a starter, but a guy like Ballard at #40 seems to have just as good a chance. Again, not about 1st round picks, but about Top 10 pick.
I would MUCH rather trade down and get Watt or Jordan instead of Bowers at #9, or wait to see which of the many good DEs in this draft fall to #40 – like Wilkerson or Ballard, etc.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
I don't agree with drafting DE's in the first round
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
well, trading down is another discussion. i’ve actually thought for several months that trading down would be the best way to address multiple needs.
my point here is that if we do stay at #9, and Bowers or quinn are there, they would provide the best value at that pick.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions
Disagree
T. Smith (in my opinion) provides more to our team, and to a lesser extent so does Prince. Even if I can’t trade down and Q and B are there, personally, I don’t draft either of them. If Smith and Prince are gone…I’d rather reach for Watt or Jordan who better fit our system day one and seem to have more upside, though I realize some my think I am crazy for it.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
I’m not sold on Smith being a top 10 player. You may be right that Watt or Jordan might be better for us day one, but if in 3 years, Quinn or Bowers is getting 10 or 12 sacks a year opposite Ware, are you being too short sighted?
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Watt won't be better from day one... What are we expecting stat wise from a 3-4 DE?
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
I think he’s saying that Watt would be a better fit and contribute day one. I’m saying that might be true based on what we ask 3-4 DE to do. But, I don’t think there’s any comparison about what the long term productivity will be with someone like Quinn or Bowers versus Watt.
Watt will be a solid player for a decade, but he will not have the impact those guys will simply because of the position he plays.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions
So if he won't have the same impact that the other players will have, then why are we even looking at his direction....
Take a look at all the 3-4 teams and see how high they draft their DE’s. You see a trend?
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
And that is a big question
that might be true based on what we ask 3-4 DE to do
We (and i include myself in the “We” camp, assume that Rob’s DE in the 3-4 will be what Wade and Bill wanted as DE’s…..it may not be the case
He who laughs last, thinks slowest
Well.....my days of not taking you seriously have certainly come to a middle
"Pleased to meet you, hope you guess my name"
Look at the good DE's
Look at Cullen Jenkins, Aaron Smith, Richard Seymour in the Patriots, Luis Castillo… These are the premier 3-4 DE’s. Look at their stats and that is about as good as your going to get. Your not going to get double digit sacks from the DE position. Atmost your hoping to get maybe 3 sacks on a good year from them. That is why Im not about putting a premium pick in a position that is going to constantly get double teamed. Unless it’s a nose tackle like Vince Wilfork or Casey Hampton. Or even Jamal Williams during his dominant years. They set the defense. The DE’s we can find in the lower rounds like 4-6. Some of the better ones where UDFAs
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
I don't think drafting a 3-4 DE in the first round is a good idea.
I would rather take Martez Wilson than actually draft a 3-4 DE. But I do agree with you that T. Smith or Carimi and Prince would make a much better impact than getting a DE.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
No, they won't have the same impact as getting another position on defense
Like CB or MLB. I could say OLB, but because they take time to catch on, we are looking at a 1-3 year project before they hit their stride.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
To say I know much about these college players would be a lie
I just don’t see the need for a d line guy. I know there are lots of them that have good grades, but we need an O-line guy or a secondary player. I’m a Victor Butler guy myself…he can really get into the backfield.
A great OLB would be great,
but the O-line is a mess. Jerry needs to fix the glaring problem on the right side of the O-line or we’ll be watching the games with Romo in street clothes again. Without Romo at QB, this team has no chance of winning anything. I hope Jerry shotguns the draft with multi O-lineman picks.
Lock n Load
If we were looking to drop spencer after this year...
We would need to have someone behind him who we thought was compitent enough to fill in. I know that Victor Butler has made the most out of his small opportunities, but how is he against the run. Anthony Spencer does contribute agains the run and he is more dominant than Ware. But because we put more of an emphasis on the sacks than the run “Von Miller”, that is why we think Spencer is approaching the bust mark. I wouldn’t mind giving Butler a try to see what he is about. I just don’t want them sacrificing the run to get a couple more sacks. We would also need to draft for that position kinda high up to get a plan “b” in place too. Next year, I would probably put that up on the list of needs. I think we have other glaring holes that need to be fixed. Also, Spencer is still in his rookie contract and it’s cheaper to keep him than to create a hole that right now isn’t the worst thing in the world.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
i keep hearing that spencer is this dominate player against the run. I think that is a defense mechanism that hides the fact that he has done squat playing opposite the best pass rusher in the NFL the last couple of years.
Look, I don’t hate Spencer, I just don’t think he’s done near enough for everyone to pass on folks that could be double digit sack guys in this league.
No he is dominant against the run...
Look at his PFF analytics against the run. He has better run stopping stats than Ware. I think maybe he might do better in a 4-3 scheme or maybe a ILB…
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
True..
We just can’t discredit what Anthony Spencer does bring to to the table when it comes to our defense. Again, we just put more emphasis on our OLB’s to generate sacks and not worry about the run.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
Well there's a lot here to disagree with.
One you can’t compare Spencer straight up to James Harrison, Clay Matthews, or Terrell Suggs. His role in the Cowboys’ defense is completely different than their roles in their respective defenses. In 2009 he racked up more tackles than Ware and was far better at getting hits per rush than Ware was. Which is not to say he’s as good as Ware, but he’s still got much more potential than most of you are giving him credit for.
Furthermore, in Matthews’ case, Anthony Spencer doesn’t have BJ Raji at Nose Tackle, nor does he have a defensive end as good as Cullen Jenkins or Ryan Picket to soak up blockers. As to Woodley, he’s playing behind Casey Hampton who constantly demands double teams and soaks up blockers. Just because Spencer plays SOLB in a 34 defense doesn’t mean that his role is the same as other SOLBs in every other 34 defense. The DL sucked pretty hard and the secondary isn’t capable of covering anyone. He still excelled against the run, he won’t be Clay Matthews, but then again he doesn’t have to be. He plays opposite of Demarcus Ware, his role is completely different. I’m with Keg, I think he’ll be a very productive player in the new system with a more motivated team and a better defensive line. He won’t be Matthews or Ware, but he doesn’t have to be.
Side note: if you want to replace him with Von Miller, I’m all for it. Just not Da’quan Bowers or Robert Quinn, for now.
Sorry. I don’t buy this. So you’re telling me we should expect more of Woodley because he plays opposite Harrison? We shouldn’t expect more than 5 sacks from Spencer? He gets single blocked on almost every passing down. POTENTIAL. It’s not like the dude is a 2nd year player.
I know it sounds like I’m hating on him, but I find the going out of our way to defend him somewhat silly.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Well he is right..
BJ Raji and Hampton are more likely to disguise their coverage than what we ask of Ratliff. So that in it’s self will generate more opportunities.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
That's not what I was suggesting
I’m suggesting that Woodley and Matthews have very different roles in the defense, and thus should be judged differently than them. If this defense had Ngata, Hampton, or Raji I’m sure everyone’s production would increase. Ratliff is awesome, but not really the protypical 34 NT. And it doesn’t help that Igor and Spears kinda sucked last year.
Well..
They run more complex defenses than we do. Dom Capers and Dick Lebeau use fire zone and disguise there coverage. Because of our simplicity, teams figured us out and knew how to block us.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
Exactly
That and Wade Phillips’ superb ability to have his team completely unprepared for Sundays lead to the entire defense sucking except for Demarcus Ware (who will likely end up a top 100 player of all time, so he’s an exception) because of this I feel that Spencer needs another year to show his stuff.
True...
I only blame Phillips in accomodating his defense to the players so he couldn’t run complex formations. I’m sorry there is a difference between schemeing around your players and dumbming your defense down for your players.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
Von Miller absolutely sucks against the run...
No thanks… I’ll pass. That and the fact that he is not the best in pass coverage. Id rather keep Anthony Spencer.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
Well he's improved dramatically
He’s an athletic freak of nature, he was only asked to get to the QB in Texas A&M, while I agree he isn’t perfect for the system as is, I feel that he’s a rare enough talent that you should draft him and build the system around him.
No, we have that with Demarcus Ware...
If we didn’t have any real glaring holes, then I would say take a chance on him and let him develop. But we need a RT NOW. Can’t waste time on a project right now.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
What if we get Bowers in the 1st and Marcus Cannon in the 2nd?
Cannon is going to be a beast at RT.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Cannon
Will be a beast at RG, not RT…especially in a system like Garrett’s where he asks his OTs to be athletic.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
Cannon can play RT. he is much more athletic than you think. go watch the clips.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah but he's huge.
There would be no way he could keep up with speed rushers like Orapko or Tuck.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
I have watched the clips
And I wouldn’t rely on Cannon blocking in open spaces or downfield on a screen. The days of 6’5" 360lb OT is a thing of the past…as is building our team around a power run blocking game
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
HEre’s the combine numbers
Carimi – 6’7" 314 29 reps
5.18 40
2.8 20
1.78 10
31.5 vert
Cannon – 6’5" 358 33 reps
5.26 40
3.07 20
1.84 10
vert 30.5
Those numbers are really close, especially the 10 yard and vert. Cannon is much more athletic than folks give him credit. He could very well be a pro bowler at G, but I think he could step in day one and play tackle. Remember 2 years ago when TCU went into death valley, he shut out Ricky Sapp. Totally dominated him. Go back and check it out.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Um
358 and 314 arent close. And a 10th of a second is the difference between an Anthony Spencer sack and all those hurries and almost.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
if you don’t think carimi and cannon are close as players, you’re on crack.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah
They are close in they are both white. Thats about it. Im not knocking Canon. He would be a dominant RG. But a right tackle? Nope. I think Trent Cole would switch sides just to get some of that action.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
That shows me you don’t know what you’re talking about. Cannon is not white.
Go back and watch what he did to Ricky Sapp.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions
I apologize...
I confused him for Carimi…I should know better. I was watching him in the bowl game against Wisconsin.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
He could prove us all wrong and get it right, but i put him to similar build of Leonard Davis when the Cardinals drafted him and tried him out at OT
It didn’t work and they labelled him a bust. We got him and got some productive years out of him at RG.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
Can you link me the video?
I can’t find it on Youtube
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
How about the agility measurables?
You seem to have forgotten his 3 cone drill – 8.07 sec and his 20 yard shuttle – 4.97sec.
Of the 55 OL at the combine, these rank Cannon at 38th and 33rd, respectivelly. He is not agile and quickfooted enough to be a dominant OT (in my opinion – and many others)
I can’t show you Carimi’s #‘s because he did not do those drills at the combine. He will likely do them at his Pro Day, but I think he will rank in the teens or twenties since they will show that he doesn’t have the footwork and agility to play LT.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
I don’t think Cannon is suited for LT either. But he can play RT. His 10 yard was less than .10 away and his 20 was less than .30 away. That tells me that in small spaces, he has plenty of explosion.
AGain, go back and look at what he did against Ricky Sapp 2 years ago!
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Right...
small spaces, like playing RG. You need to have quick feet to play on the edge as a RT and Cannon does not.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
For comparison
Castonzo 3cone drill – 7.25 and 20yard shuttle is 4.40
That is over half a second better with each. It seems tiny difference, but that is huge in terms of footwork and ability to play OT as opposed to OG.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
I should also mention
that I did used to be a Cannon at OT fan. I thought he would prove skeptics wrong, but throughout the Senior Bowl week and then the combine, those hopes were quelled.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
Well watching the senior bowl in regards to oline
Created more questions than answers really…
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
HAHA
yeah, it seemed the world turned upside down for some people. Sherrod at one point was thought as one of the only true LT prospects, but didn’t prove it. Castonzo started showing he was underestimated, Solder…well, he showed he doesn’t belong in the 1st round (at least in my mind)
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
- Tom Landry
Oh yeah...
I think athletic OL is the future. Which is why I’m okay with selecting Tyron Smith at #9 and hope that Ijalana falls to them in the second round.
I was the last one to post sorry,
Normally I do, just a slip of my mouse.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
Why Bowers in the first?
We could get Carimi in the first?
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
not at 9. again, if we’re talking about trading down, then i am okay with that. but if you’re saying carimi at 9, i want what you are smoking.
by MacarthurTexas on Mar 28, 2011 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Meh.
Tyson Alualu. If he’s your guy, and you can’t trade down, I’m down with reaching. I’m all about “get your guy” if that requires that you trade up, then so be it. If you can trade down and get him? Awesome. If not, well then “reaching” is fine. I think we know a lot less about how teams value draft prospects than we think we do. Especially this year.
If it's one guy in particular
Then yes you could reach for him. But there are about 3 to 4 OT that could possibly fit our needs. We have a particular favorite but not one by a large shot so it doesn’t require us to reach.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
If that's the case
But I have a feeling that Jerry and Stephen are playing things more closely to the chest this year. If Carimi is your guy, which he may be…they’re looking at very different things than Kiper, Bunting, and Mayock are looking for.
I really never listen to those guys. Id rather listen to your draft mocks than theirs....
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
And I don't mean that as an insult to any one of you guys who mock drafts
Your much better at it than I am…
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
No your right. I think I'm just going to stick with the trade down.
The only one I like at 9 is prince. But even his opportunity cost is too high.
F**** establishing a culture, we need to establish dominance...
Here's the real question.
Are we willing to extend Spencer for $7 or 8m a year(just a guess)? If so, we shouldn’t be drafting OLB. If not, do we want to spend big money on another OLB? or let a rookie start at OLB that we might have to draft in the late first round? If the answer to all of those is no, this could be the perfect opportunity to draft an impact player at OLB, if there is one we really like. Rotate him with Spencer this year, and go spend the money you would have used on Spencer at a position cheaper to fill than OLB.
by honkytonkbaseball on Mar 28, 2011 3:30 PM CDT reply actions
let me jump in here for a second about Cannon
yeah, he has a weight problem but since the combine when he showed up in great shape for a guy his size I am pretty confident you can work his body down a little
1-he played LT for TCU this season, which is amazing to me because you think he would be slow and fat, he actually has really good footwork
2-He can play RT and RG in the NFL, depending on what that team needs, you plug him in
3-He is big, size cannot be taught and is pretty athletic man, did you watch the combine when he lossed a few pounds? he could really move well
I think Cannon is a 2nd round pick and a good one because the guy has versatility he is strong and has really good feet
now am I saying Cannon is a LT? Lord no, but I do believe he is a really good RG in the making or a good RT
Marcus Gilbert is another guy I think the Cowboys are interested in because he played LT for Florida, the Cowboys LOVE versatile players
you must consider not only are we looking for a RT, we are looking for a swing tackle who can also play LT
I think that is a major component of drafting a OT this year that is kind under the surface
we need a kid who can start at RT, but at the same time have some experiance playing LT just IN case we need to plug him in IF Free goes down
I mean personally I love Tyron Smith right, I would plug him in at RT but say we move Free back to RT because Smith is the better LT
at this point we dont know who has the better skills for LT
but remember how domiant we were with Free at RT? If we get a RT and have Free, this offense will be humming
by Archie Barberio on Mar 28, 2011 5:55 PM CDT reply actions
I like the way you think, Chia . . .
. . . and that’s not a wise Crack!
From the hometown of Bob Lilly,
This year take a hard look at Victor Butler
Have him share snaps with Spencer and may the better man win. IF neither get it done then we go after an OLB next year. This year let it go and see what Ryan can do with Spencer.
Quinns numbers worry me; just slighty better than Spencers and he has had an entire year to do nothing but work on them.
Okay, just two quick things on Bowers.
1. He’s NOT still recovering from knee surgery. He had a partly torn meniscus in a knee, played half the season on it (and got about half his sacks on it), got the surgery to fix it immediately in the offseason, and is completely healed. The only reason he did not do a full workout at the combine was because he had only been back in training for 3 weeks, while the other guys had about 8-9 weeks. He wanted to give himself a better chance so he’s waiting until this week for his pro day to work out fully.
2. He’s an AWFUL fit for our scheme. Maybe a really creative guy like The Dude Ryan would be able to figure out how to use him in it, but he’s a 4-3 weakside DE, and a damn good one. If you put him in a 3-4 at either OLB or DE you are wasting his talents. He should always be playing to get into the backfield as a disruptor, not taking on double teams on a regular basis, or covering guys in the flat.
DE pick
I think it would be a wasted pick. 2 reasons why. 1. lets see what ryan can do with spencer. we used a 1st round pick on him and seems to be too soon to be giving up on him. 2, we have too many other needs to address to take a pick on someone that isn’t a huge need

by 

























