A New Sheriff in Town
The ferris wheel that is the position of Head Coach of the Dallas Cowboys has come almost full circle since Jimmy Johnson bid adieu to Dallas for greener pastures. Now, a Jimmy Johnson product, Jason Garrett, assumes the helm of a team that has a much larger void to address than any issue with who starts at Free Safety the next time they strap on their helmets. Jason Garrett has to teach this organization what it feels like to play with confidence and to win with swagger again. Now, you would think this isn't such a daunting task since he watched Jimmy do it, he played and coached under other successful men and is generally regarded as a very bright, driven, pedigreed young man. No problem, right?
Not so fast. Jason Garrett's task is bigger than even he thinks it is. His challenges are very different than the ones he (and we) watched Jimmy overcome to create a dynasty. Some of his challenges may even be unique to him because of some personal experiences that left indelible marks on him (more on that later).
Let's look deeply into what our new Head Coach has to contend with to remake this team in his own image after the jump;
The ‘Jimmy Thing'
Props to Dave Matthews for turning a phrase here (albeit a different spelling), but Jason won't have the bevy of draft picks that Jimmy acquired through his shrewd dealing of Herschel Walker to had-to-be-drunk-as-a-skunk-when-he-did-the-deal Mike Lynn and the Minnesota Vikings. Putting a roster like the one Dallas put together in the early 90's would require Garrett and the Dallas War Room to display a ton of draft-day prowess (note: up to this point we have not seen that skill displayed), a far greater wherewithal in regards to free agency that would belie his limited experience and an innate ability to uncover undrafted gems like Romo and Austin on a much grander scale. Jimmy didn't have Free Agency, outside of Plan B, to contend with and trading players for picks now happens few and far between. In fact, we can probably thank Jimmy for that! Truth be told, Garrett will also need a lot of luck. He will have to exercise wisdom and skill beyond his years to fill many talent gaps that have existed for years now.
The Jones Boyzzz
Let's be honest with each other for a moment. Anyone who really thinks, not HOPES, and I mean really, really, thinks Jerry will cede any significant control over who the Cowboys draft, sign, cut, pick as a cheerleader or ask to sing at a halftime show is out of their cock-a-doodle-doo mind. Jerry has always been quick to make sure everyone knows the state of the state when it comes to HIS team and has no problem saying it when he needs to. Jerry is not above quoting Al Haig and saying, "I'm in control here". Okay, maybe he's never said it quite like that, but at least his actions are always in alignment with those words. So we know that Garrett has to contend with Jerry and his ego. However, the other question that needs asking and answering is, what role does Stephen Jones play now? Jimmy never had to contend with a third party when driving the Cowboys bus. There's a triumvirate that sits at the top of the Cowboys' decision-making tree and one has to wonder if Garrett is the co-pilot or if he will simply be the flight attendant serving tiny bottles of Chivas Regal to those other two guys seated in First Class.
The T.O. Aftereffect
I don't know how it got this bad. When did it become acceptable for players, regardless of their star power, to have sideline tirades, berate coaches, fail to conform to the dress code and conduct themselves off the field in a manner that erodes their team's, as well as the game's, legitimacy? Did I miss a memo? I wonder who started this awful trend? Regardless, Garrett's inexperience in dealing with the huge ego's that will invariably appear on any team isn't a huge deal, because all new first-timers have to endure this baptism by fire. But, and here is the unique thing about Jason Garrett, given the amount of psychological trauma that he had to endure while Terrell Owens ruled the roost (aka locker room) and the airwaves, one has to wonder what wounds are not yet mended with our Mr. Garrett. Moreover, how did that experience impact his value system? Did it change the way he looked at players in this last draft class? Was he so spooked by even the hint of cocksureness in his player interviews that he might bypass a potential star for a lesser talent who he believed would never rock the proverbial boat? And if he was, who could blame him? Fans forget easily the travails that he endured but Garrett lived it every day, and night, for the better part of a football season. When Garrett talks about the "right kind of guy", it's likely that anyone possessing ANY of the personality traits that remind him of Owens (or, for that matter, Barber, Bennett and others) would be marginalized by him. The obvious risk, again, is that you end up with a roster full of "high-character" guys who just don't have the elite talent to carry a team to the upper echelons.
The 4-Year Itch
Finally...and sadly, Dallas has not been known for coaching longevity in the Jerry Jones era. Regardless of how successful (i.e. Jimmy) or how big an utter failure (i.e. Campo) the coaches have been, there's a pattern in Valley Ranch that suggests the Cowboys' brain trust, and I use that term loosely, likes to see a new man at the helm every four years. They get an itchy trigger finger and are sometimes quick to use it if the media smells blood in the water. So while fans want to believe that if Garrett can show success early and often, that trend could change, the math says he has until 2015 and then he goes and does something else for someone else. In that time, he has to get a defense on the field that doesn't leave opposing receivers unmolested over the deep middle while also consistently pressuring the QB opposite Ware. He has to retool an offensive line that is old and creaky and he has to get the locker room to buy all of what he is selling. The fact is that his future is inexorably tied to the performances of Tony Romo and Rob Ryan. It's doubtful that either of those two is still in the same job in 2015 anyway.
But let's not be one-sided in our view of our man Garrett's future. He has some things working in his favor as he tries to restore this once proud franchise to its rightful position on the NFL throne.
Nobody is THAT Good
Now I like Green Bay's roster (especially with many big names returning from injuries) and coaches as much as the next guy, but really, are they as mighty as people are making them out to be? I don't think so. Woodson is turning 47 years old this season and should begin to decline. They will also get hit with some high-impact losses in Free Agency. The Saints are a year removed from the dream season, but their time may have come and gone. Philly with Vick doesn't scare me half as much as Philly with Jim Johnson (May he rest in peace) did. In the AFC, the big three (Pittsburgh, New England and Indy) are in decline as age erodes the Steeler defense's talent base and Manning and Brady see the twilight of their careers fast approaching. Let's be real. It's not like Garrett has to dethrone Joe Montana's 49ers at the height of their dynasty. Most experts agree that Dallas is the most talented team to have earned a draft position in the top 10 in several years. So, the good news is that while they have to climb the mountain, it's neither overly high nor all that steep.
Nowhere to Go but Up
I hate to say it, but I can't just take a shower and wash last year's debacle off of me. It may as well be branded on my forehead. "The Dallas Cowboys were 6-10 in 2010." They say the truth will set you free. I say the truth hurts. Maybe it's actually the hurt that sets you free. Regardless, I think all of us would be hard pressed to find football pundits in the media who think Dallas WON'T improve in 2011. I, for one, truly believe they will. How much? Dunno. But my confidence level is pretty high that they will be better than 6-10. That alone makes Garrett likely to be viewed as the savior, even if we're only 8-8 or 9-7 this year. I know people have grander designs on this year's team, but he just needs to focus on getting better. Improvement in any way will be seen as a huge step in the right direction, especially if we are very competitive in our losses. Overall, the good news is that he's almost starting from ‘zero', so it won't be overly difficult to come out looking like a ‘hero'.
The Halo Effect
For those of you not wanting to spend the time to look it up, the Halo Effect is a bias that creates a belief about a person or persons based on one's perception of another trait for that same individual or group. The biggest advantage Jason Garrett has, in the locker room with his players, is simply that he is widely perceived as being the smartest guy in the room. It's reasonable, since this is the first time since Jimmy left (maybe even going back to Landry), that this could be said, with a straight face, about the Head Coach of the Cowboys, that people will see him as a great coach as an illogical extension (aka Halo Effect). That will almost certainly work in his favor and should make give him FDR-like power over the players in the first 100 days, er, first 16 games. He may turn out to be just an average coach, but even average coaches have shown they can win Super Bowls (Brian Billick anyone?) if the conditions are right.
All in all, we're just starting to turn the first few pages of the proverbial book that will ultimately be written about Jason Garrett's time as Head coach of the Dallas Cowboys. While I tend to be a bit more measured in my enthusiasm over such changes (that's the 4-Year Itch thing at play), I feel like Garrett gives us an interesting opportunity. He talks about being in the moment, taking pride in what you do and in focusing on getting better every single day. While it's far too early to gauge his coaching talent, he is cerebral and focused and hard working...and if a football team ever needed traits from a role model as Head Coach, those are the traits I would have asked the coach to have for this team. Garrett's story, to this point, is one of overcoming obstacles to reach his goals. Let's hope he continues to do that and, even more, can get his team to do the same.
GO COWBOYS!
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
153 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
5B, very insightful piece.
I’m just hoping that the business side of JJ has kicked in and he realizes that with a debt payments on his palace, the overall economic conditions, the poor track record over the last 16 years and to wit, the total collapse last year, will compel him to truly change his posture and realize that the Cowboys need to return to winning if the mystique and allure of the franchise is to survive. Football will survive, but if “Americas Team” is to remain atop the perch as “America’s Team”, we’ll have to return to our winning ways.
Do you think Jerry is in a bad fiscal position?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
I'd trade spots with him
:-)
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
About Divas...
This is a team sport is it not? So it is logical to want team players.
Absolutely
I wondered aloud if Garrett was at all skittish given what happened with Owens.
The best analogy I could think of was how many people refused to go in the water after they saw Jaws for the first time.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Maybe
I just see some waffling when it comes to people saying they really value leadership (like romo) vs. a playmaker regardless of being a diva (owens)
More mindboggling to me was back when Andre Johnson fought Finnegan, Nick Eatman was all for Andre sticking it to him because Finnegan was just a dirty player. But, when I commented to The Lunch Break that I wouldn’t want someone like Fairley on our team because he’s a dirty player, Eatman said he’d love to have someone with a dirty streak on this team.
I'm kinda in Eatman's camp
I think I’ve been pretty up front about my feelings about a lack of nastiness, especially in the trenches, on this Cowboys team.
Every team needs their enforcers. Dallas needed Charles Haley. Baltimore needed Ray Lewis. Pittsburgh needed James Harrison. You have to have ferocity in this ultra-physical combat sport that is the NFL.
Our most ferocious guy? I’d say it’s Colombo. He’s got a mean streak. The other guys? they get stepped on by Albert Haynesworth. People say Jay Ratliff is nasty, but I don’t see it.
Romo and Ware are the faces of this team and neither of them strikes fear into the hearts of their opponents. Compare that to the steely-eyed resolve that Aikman brought and the borderline psychotic anger exuded by Haley. the fact is that they had a ton of guys who scared people. Erik Williams? Larry Allen? Leon Lett?
If you go back further to the Landry era, that team was full of big meanies too. Randy White, Harvey Martin, Howley, Cliff Harris…the list goes on.
This is at the heart of the question I am asking. Would JG have given a guy like Haley a chance to play opposite Ware if he could?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
I could see T. Smith being one of those guys
He’s just such a physical specimen he could tear it up on the line.
One other thing about Fairley. Eatman along with his opinion said he’d love his nastiness even if it meant a personal foul every once in a while. Really? I could have sworn everyone was up in arms about the amount of penalties this team was committing.
You misunderstand what most people are up in arms about
What we hate is mental lapses. All of the pre-snap penalties. Lining up off-sides. False starts. Holding. Illegal shifts. Illegal formations. ARGH!!!
A little unnecessary roughness once in a while might not be such a bad thing if it is a trade-off for the mental lapses that have been comonplace for many years now.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Hell yeah,
Give me an UR call. One more FS and I’m gonna snap.
To this day I have no idea what that woman was singing about. Like, literally no idea. I don’t know what a hollaback girl is. But I have to imagine it is a foul, disease ridden thing that wears too much make-up just to cover up the fact that it is a forty-seven year-old fish dog. – Family guy
by BlueNSilverBlood on May 14, 2011 8:20 AM CDT up reply actions
Then don't see Soul Surfer
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Dammit
I am writing a piece about the halo effect, except I’m going to call it something else, and it’ll either be in the Cowboys Annual or coming to a Cowboys blog near you in a couple of weeks. Who gave you the ok to have that idea?
by One.Cool.Customer on May 11, 2011 4:10 PM CDT reply actions
Seniority :)
Seriously though.. I forgot all about the Annual.. any word on dates or is that TBD?
FEAR the STAR.
TBD
It’s kind of like the 2011 Season: at some point we will do one.
by One.Cool.Customer on May 11, 2011 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Sorry man, this was on my mind for a while now...
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Thank you sir!
Insightful read and inspring use of photography (as OCC used to do in his prime (I kid I kid!)
btw, How do they fit panties in those shorts? Another illsuion shot to ….
Noble attempt, though
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
How about that tan line though, eh?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
The contrast level for that bikini line isn't as significant as it should be if it was worn consistently
…which leads me to belive that sometimes, there was no need for it at all.
God Bless America.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
HAHAHA
I also like the pink lace trying to peek out of those great Cowboys Cheerleader shorts.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
What on earth would want to GET OUT of there?
I’d be fighting my way in!
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Dude,
They make panties really small now.
reallysmall.
To this day I have no idea what that woman was singing about. Like, literally no idea. I don’t know what a hollaback girl is. But I have to imagine it is a foul, disease ridden thing that wears too much make-up just to cover up the fact that it is a forty-seven year-old fish dog. – Family guy
by BlueNSilverBlood on May 14, 2011 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions
Great read
One of the best I’ve read this offseason. Well done!
by sportsfanatic21 on May 11, 2011 8:04 PM CDT reply actions
Thank you
I’ve been thoughtful of what must keep Garrett awake at night.
It’s a great chance to see what kind of personal gravitas this man has within him.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Yeah, yeah, so...
answer the question: If something close to that type of strategy occurs, this year or upcoming, is Stephen Rising? (see here for reference)
The strategy in question is signing non-Nnamdi players (posssibly multiple position, as opposed to the Asougha splash), as illustrated by the following statement (and link): “We’re better off with Davin Joseph, Cullen Jenkins and a safety to be named later than with one Nnamdi.”
Or is the “There’s a triumvirate…other two guys seated in First Class” acknowledging a change in the decision-making authority within this franchise’s organizational structure? Should Rising be Risen, in your view? Are you saying there’s an UnWholly Trinity atop the Cowboys’ decision-making tree?
btw, decent read. Want to savour it like a mellow single-malt, ponder the points that need to be corrected refined in its presentation. Be getting back to ya.
I believe Stephen IS, in fact, rising
I think Stephen will prove to be less of a showman and more likely to be less reactive to media and fan reaction to things than his father when his time comes.
That said, this is the beginning of a transition phase where Jerry badly wants the bling, but knows he has to be ready to pass the torch to his son. That doesn’t mean Jerry is going anywhere anytime soon but it makes sense to me that Jerry would start to become more owner and less GM as a first step toward a new type of three-chamber governance system. Jerry being the executive branch, of course.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Every journey begins with the first step.
Transition in such a manner tends to be less disruptive than many alternatives much of the time. So long the end result doesn’t become 3-chamber russian roulette, it suits previous discussions in this regard, as I recall.
Awww hell, let's get to it
1. Are you claiming the TO situation vis-a-vis the Cowboys caused JG to pick “safe” players in the 2011 draft and ignore a sure-fire “better” player? Be ready to define “better” this time.
2. Who was the “potential star for a lesser talent who he believed would never rock the proverbial boat” passed over in your mind when you wrote this phrase?
3. What evidence is there supporting “it’s likely that anyone possessing ANY of the personality traits that remind him of Owens (or, for that matter, Barber, Bennett and others) would be marginalized by him”? Precisely which personality traits? Who’s been marginalized solely for possessing one of those personality traits (whichever it refers to)?
Direct and to the point
…so unlike you.
Claiming? No. Worthy of engagement in dialogue about the possibility? Abso-freakin’-lutely.
Star? Fairley comes to mind.
Marginalized? Start with MBIII…there are others. Some we know about. Some we will.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
I don't think Fairley will be a star
although going to Detroit will be the best thing for him.
But to your point, I thought I heard a rumor the ‘Boys didn’t have Fairley on their board because of his personality. Don’t remember where I heard it, or if I just made it up…. But I think I remember hearing something about it.
"There are no traffic jams along the extra mile." ~ Roger Staubach
Not unbelievable given what Garrett has said thus far, is it?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Not unbelievable
Given indications to date. Unbelievable would more likely be that it was the sole reason for the Cowboys not selecting said player.
Returning to the three: Agreed, worthy; Why would you say Fairley is any more or less a star than the Cowboys selection, given neither have played a pro down?; What character trait is it that MBIII shares with TO that, according to you, caused JG to marginalize him? Are you completely dismissing gametime performance considerations, or lack thereof?
The notoriety that Fairley had
Centerpiece on Auburn’s FBS Championship defense.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Ahhh, you ASSUME Defense was Cowboys' priority...
And because JG didn’t “like” Fairley’s notoriety it caused the Cowboys to go Offense and take Smith. Remember, assumption introduces error.
Your statement requires the Defense priority at #9, a Cowboys’ evaluation of said player as the “best” avalable to fulfill said priority and something, anything, indicating JG’s “not the right kind of guy” call being the determining factor in the selection.
Sorry, bud, gotta call BS till you show me the Cowboys’ board with that indicated or get JG to admit notoriety was the reason he prefered Smith over Fairley outright. Oh, plus, that he actually had th epower or make the selection, that Jerry and Stephen would be simply rubber-stamping it.
No
I think Dallas could have addressed the O-line several times over if they had gone with Fairley as a potential 5-technique or…as we have discussed, traded down and took Cam Jordan and picked an OT and an OG in round 2.
I think there were lots of ways to play it.
But you asked who I thought the “star” was.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
There was No trade
It didn’t happen. Period.
The “addressed the O-line several times over” and the “Or” you mention didn’t happen. Period.
Accept what you see in this regard. It’s fact. Thinking about it ain’t gonna change it. Not now.
Now, if you’d thought, acted on that thought and proven it to the decision-makers, maybe you could have changed what is.
As is, neither Fairley nor the Cowboys’ selection has proven to be a “star”. In either the star or Star sense.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
But can we agree that he had more fan notoriety than the one who will wear the star?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Sure, in the unfavorable, or notorious, sense
Not in the widely-known sense. Without evidence either way, I’d say both would’ve been about equivalent within fandom, Fairley perhaps with an insignificant edge because of non-fans watching the BCS finale with fans and Smith not being in an equivalently voluminously-viewed game within that period.
Regardless, the question relative to the “potential star ” was to illustrate that your perception and evaluation of Cowboys’ needs, draft decisions, long-term team and franchise strategy and the “potential” of players to address or help solve particular challenges associated with the entirety of those considerations differed from the decision-makers, not that either was any more or less “correct” than the other. Time’ll tell that. Time alone.
At least yours has a chance of being proven correct. Or not. Mine’s meaningless.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
But not that that was the SOLE determinant in...
Fairley not being the Cowboys’ selection at #9.
There’s always a butt but.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
Yes, who's to know for sure but those in the war room...
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Ahhh, but even they...
We never see our own weaknesses in the proper light.
May never see their own weaknesses in the proper light. Hindsight too is suspect when personally involved.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
I agree with you... it is definitely worth dialogue.
But I’m not sure Barber deserves inclusion in this list. He plays like a lion, talks to media like a lamb while never saying a cross word about his teammates and always takes care of his bizness to the extent that his battle-wounded body is capable. He is marginalized from us as fans but so far as I am aware this is not a problem with the team. I know he has been holding the team back somewhat in the run game for a couple of years now, but that is actually evidence that he is exactly the type of personality that JG LIKES, because he got a ton of playtime while injured and less effective (and with two competent backups) presumably for the intangibles he provided to the team. MBIII is actually a pretty good example of an “enforcer,” albeit on offense and no longer effective, who had the wholehearted endorsement of JG.
To your point though, it does SEEM like JG over-emphasizes personality because he has played MBIII many times stubbornly in spite of lack of effectiveness (and in the process never giving MBIII time to heal properly leaving him to string together half-seasons of mediocrity). I guess we will see with time how much this is actually true. It is also possible that this was Jerry or Wade’s call, but I have a hunch it was mostly JG.
Another thing I am eager to see… how comfortable will JG be at starting/playing development players? I was disappointed last season that JG mostly continued Wade’s trend of holding developmental players/young guys/rookies on the bench even when the game and/or season did not matter any more. It remains to be seen, I think, if this was because those games (including any “style points”) were basically an audition for JG. Playing these guys has several long-term benefits, including resting the starters, giving competition (in a low-pressure setting) to the starters, developing the young guys’ skills, giving opportunity to evaluate them, and providing evidence of our “confidence” in them (which even if we don’t like them much, enhances their trade value). I have scratched my head for years at the Cowboy’s refusal do do this until injury forces the question, and I wanted to blame it all on Wade but JG didn’t exactly change that approach last season.
Thanks for chiming in
I included Barber because the word on the street was that he didn’t buy into the whole dress code thing and the “new rules” that Garrett was implementing.
I find this part interesting;
Another thing I am eager to see… how comfortable will JG be at starting/playing development players? I was disappointed last season that JG mostly continued Wade’s trend of holding developmental players/young guys/rookies on the bench even when the game and/or season did not matter any more.
Who were you most interested in seeing on the field that didn’t get to play?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Well, this year...
Mostly had in mind the young OL, OLB’s, and ILB’s. The LB’s did get some time, but not as much as I would have liked to see for the reasons I mentioned above. It would also have been nice to see AOA on the field at safety for a few meaningless snaps each game, although I can see how AOA might not have had the practice prep time for that.
There are many examples over the last several seasons, but for JG’s reign, I think that’s it. The way that we waited for injuries to take a good hard look at Doug Free, Miles Austin, and Tashard Choice in live fire just concerns me.
All fair points
…but I thinkyou need to consider the fact that, at least over the last 8 games last year, Jason was going through an interview process with Jerry and Stephen.
If they had put newbies in there, the team probably wouldn’t have gone 5-3, not played with fewer mental mistakes and not provided Garrett the favorable impression that undoubtedly led to (or at least weighed heavily in) him getting the nod for the HC job.
Prior to that, I’m sure Winnie wouldn’t have wanted to see young guys in the lineup because their potential for error might make Wade look bad. Obviously, even that tactic couldn’t overcome his ineptitude.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
That's exactly what I meant when I mentioned JG "auditioning" and "style points"
My point is, he still hasn’t shown much inclination to do that… maybe the auditioning thing kept him from doing it, or maybe not. I was ‘disappointed’, but I’m glad JG got the job so I’m happy with the result. Now to show that he’s comfortable putting guys out there who he doesn’t trust as much… his track record thus far (eg MBIII) suggests he’s hesitant to do that but as you point out, he has no track record as full-fledged HC.
I still can't figure out why Choice got frozen out
…maybe one day I will.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Look to your marginalized point. It'll give you a starting point.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
I also found his play calling pretty poor at several points in 2009 and 2010...
and at one point I was fed up with how predictable they were.
Payton and McCarthy are both OC’s who’ve stepped up their game and gotten their teams blings by hiring a DC to totally run the defense (again, I am assuming neither of them have anything to do with the way the defense is run during games but don’t know anything for sure).
Can Garrett do the same?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Call it predictable, poor, suspect, what have you...
I too was frustrated with the seeming ineptitude, especially the failure to adjust at the half (which, regardless of how disasterous a 1st half has been, seems to be a mark of good coaching, though that’s merely age-wearied eyeball-tested).
Can he? Yes. Will he? My personal observation, yes. His managerial and leadership style indicates a delegate responsibility/authority methodology. I do not perceive a micro-manager in him. Do you?
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
I actually hope he is a micromanager
It’s the details that seem to beguile this team.
For instance, I’m glad Hudson Houck knows what protections to call, but how come his players don’t enough to get lower than their opponents?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Then he is the wrong man for the job
What you speak of isn’t micromanagement and you damn well know it, 5B.
A HC, seeing such a thing, might mention it in passing to players during practice (either in hearing of the respective subordinate coach or not), in private to the coach in question (as part of that coach’s education, enlightenment, or such things), but should not be dealing with such day-to-day details consistently.
Would you have him telling RR how to do his job? Each and every day, each practice, each coach, each player, handling minutiae?
Your agenda’s showing.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
Again...
I like Mike Shanahan for a reason.
My kind of HC. He’s not a subject matter expert in defensive philosophy, but he makes sure he owns every ounce of what takes place with his 53 guys every minute of the training day.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
What was your opinion of him going into 1988?
Even 4 games into ’89?
Ahhh, can any answer to those questions now not be influenced by hindsight? Hindsight the length of which Shanny has over Garrett. Peering back through rings might skew the perspective, mightn’t it? Who knows, maybe one day you’ll sing the same tune about this guy. Maybe not. Time’ll tell.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
or rather:
2nd round Wisniewski
3rd round either Kenrick Ellis or Martez Wilson
4th round ILB or DL according to what we didn’t take the round before
5th round the slot WR we took is fine
6th round and 7th round whatever (I did like Chapas)
Ellis scares me
He luv the ganja too much, mon.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Top notch as always
I think what is driving JJ is the Final Hurrah Effect – going out with one more Championship before giving over ever-increasing control to Stephen. He gets carried off into the sunset proclaiming he did it his way and without Jimmy.
That’s why you see so much short-term, opportunistic behavior, especially with the end of the Romo era now appearing on the horizon. Interesting tension with the freshly minted JG, ‘build for the long-term’ we’ve recently decreed in full effect.
We live life forwards and understand it backwards
Truly appreciated because I'm always fond of your contributions, whether they be posts or comments
I wonder about the Final Hurrah, though.
I think Jerry sees himself as a much younger soul than outsiders do. What has me say that? Well, how many men do you know that get the kind of work he has had done on his face? He’s not interested in aging gracefully. He wants to find the anti-life equation and outlive us all.
I think you’re right and a 6th bling, one done without Jimmy’s players or influence, would help speed things along. ButI also find it interesting that his newly minted HC is a Jimmy product (notice I didn’t say ‘protege’) and, as such, the seeds of Jimmyism are still in the soil surrounding Valley Ranch.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
For some reason
I see a 5Blings production piece:
Opening: JJ and RR in a casual setting. OK, it’s a bar.
Scene: JJ is planting seeds with RR to get JG to sign off on some Big Name Defensive FA’s
Leave the Dialogue to the wordsmith, 5B.
Remember – it’s a comedy if no one dies, tragedy otherwise, Epic Adventure when we firmly grasp the 6th B.
We live life forwards and understand it backwards
Interesting
I’ll take it under advisement.
But if it comes to be, I assure you someone will die. :-)
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Well done, my friend... well done.
For once I agree with you, Mr. Blings. While I have a man crush on Jason Garrett, I will remain cautiously optimistic until we start seeing consistent success and improvement with the Cowboys under his regime.
The good news is...
even if he fails, his style is so much more in line with what fans want to see from their HC that he’ll always be thought of more highly than his predecessor.
Thanks for the kind words.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Excellent point
I first fell in love with Garrett after watching his speech to the offense on Hard Knocks 2008. The guy just seems to get it and really know what he’s doing, and you can obviously see that anytime he talks. Completely opposite of Bumbling Wade.
Yeah
The only problem is that after the playoff win against Philly…people were yelling about how great Winnie was and how we were a healthy Marc Colombo from a 6th bling.
The world loved Wade.
Then…they didn’t.
The fans’ love is quite fickle.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
All I can say is..
I never loved Wade. I knew he was a misfit before he was hired. This guy is a joke of a head coach. Hopefully Garrett restore some order and start back winning when it counts and not being content on winning one playoff game like Cupcake..
by dcsince77 on May 12, 2011 10:29 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Never liked the guy myself
After Parcells left, I wanted Sparano to takeover as HC. I knew it was a longshot at best, so I didn’t get my hopes up. When Jerry hired Wade, I was like “humm okay, this could be good…” Then I watched the presser announcing him as HC. I’ve been against Phillips ever since. He just seemed to be incompetent from the start. All good leaders are clear, concise and confident. Wade Phillips never displayed any of those traits.
Having seen Sparano do his thing in South Beach now...
how do you think he would have done in Dallas?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Really hard to say
The team Sparano inherited in Miami was nowhere near as talented as the one in Big D. IMO, the biggest difference is that Miami is still looking for its franchise QB, whereas Sparano would have had Romo here. We all know how important a good QB is in this league.
Also, I think that being a former OL coach himself, Sparano wouldn’t have let the OL get as bad as it has become. The offensive line has been handicapping this team for years and I would like to believe that Sparano would have lobbied much harder for getting better lineman earlier in the draft.
Another huge problem under Wade is lack of discipline. I don’t know too much about Sparano, but I remember hearing about how he was a no-nonsense, just do your job kind of coach when he was here.
The long and short of it? I really don’t know, because I haven’t followed Sparano much in Miami to really judge his abilities as a head coach. I think that he couldn’t have done any worse than Wade and had a good chance of being better than him.
would have loved Sparano too
He had some Parcells in him but he was fair. He knew when to pat a guy on the back and when to chew his ass out. He was the kinda coach Romo needed, somebody who wasnt afraid to put him in check. I think Romo responds better to a coach like that. The thought of Cupcake coaching this team is sickening because I feel like we wasted some good years with his softness rubbing off on this team. I truly believe a team is the reflection of its Head Coach.
Any group is somewhat a reflection of its leader
But the HC is not always the leader.
As was the case in the Switzer Super Bowl year.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Not to nitpick, but I think it is an important point:
You say:
Jason Garrett’s task is bigger than even he thinks it is.
I think that Jason Garrett realizes far better than any of us the reality of his task. I think that he has considered far many more angles and nuances of what it will take to make this team successful than we even have, and I think it is precisely that that will continue to make him successful. It’s about preparation and planning. I highlight this point because I think it is one of the things that makes him stand out from his peers.
+1
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
I appreciate nitpicking
…so no worries.
I was attempting (poorly, I have come to find) to point out that Jason may not realize how some of his prior experiences have impacted him and, as a result, could have him doing certain things reflexively that make it more difficult to build the team he needs to build in order to win.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Really?
You don’t think he’s cognizant of the influences experiences in his life have had on him? Not completely or with the deeper comprehension the fullness of time allows, but enough that he can recognize the emotional context and effects and reduce their influence on the reasoned decision-making his responsibilites entail?
Reacting reflexively is the antithesis of reasoned consideration, of planning, of adherence to process. It will be interesting to see which is indicated as the paramount characteristic of the man’s actions, not merely his words.
Really
We never see our own weaknesses in the proper light.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Yes, really. Fools aside, some do more than others.
No one completely or with the deeper comprehension the fullness of time allows (which is why that was stated),
One may try to learn from one’s mistakes, foibles of judgment, seek the reasons and influences behind them not only so as not to make them again, but to better comprehnd oneself and the outside world’s perception of their actions and even of themselves.
One foible of which is to subscribe such introspection to the character of others when one percieves certain traits and actions, sometimes when some are not displayed. Call it granting the benefit of doubt, till proven otherwise.
I usually let what I see determine what I think
…rather than assuming everything is great until proven otherwise (see my previous rants about the 2009 draft, Winnie the Coach, the Mee-Dee-Ocrity of the team, etc.).
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Balance is an alternative
May reduce misthought. May not. Unless someone’s always right or never wrong will definitely reduce it.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
My way is safer!
:-)
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
+1
I think Garrett’s past experiences – a life of football with father as scout and plaeyr and coach and memebr of Championship teams – are certainly involved in his decisions for the vision he has created for his team. I tend to think he is using that vast pool experience much more to his benefit than his detriment.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
You bring up a good point that I missed
His dad.
What role do you think his dad had in shaping Jason’s view of what a good player looks like?
As a footnote, his father was not an accomplished head coach and went 0-10 at Columbia before resigning. What do you think Jason learned from that experience?
I also wonder about the differences between Jimmy and Saban and Coughlin. You wonder what he took from those three very different men and how that will impact him as he rebuilds the team into a new image.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
A well written piece with much thought behind it. Well done!
While I’m not trying to be argumentative, I’d like to offer another view on a point or two.
On the Jimmy Thing, you make a good point. There will never be a rapid rise of a team through a draft like that again. Not in the modern era where free agency guts a team the day after you build it. The only exception in the NFL today MIGHT be Cleveland, if they can keep convincing Atalanta to trade an entire draft or two for one player, as they did this year. :) Nope, Garrett and the boys will have to have the long term vision that modern dynasties like the Steelers and Pats have.
I agree to an extent on the Issue of JJ as GM, BUT!!!!!!!!! I also know that Jones wants to win and realizes his way hasn’t been working. He IS trying to mend his ways, as we witnessed with the release of TO, one of his pets, coupled with this years draft, a very UN-Jerry draft. Jerry is about results, and if Garrett can produce, Jerry likely will step back and let him. Did you see the Superbowl schmooze fest between Jerry and Jimmy Johnson? Jerry candidly admitted he effed up with Jimmy and I almost choked on my Shiner Bock. Jerry is mellowing and wants to win. He’s clearly taking advice from others in spite of himself. It seems his ego might be taking a back seat to his desire to win.
The TO after effect is WAY overplayed in my mind.
TO was a locker room cancer. He tried to divide and poison those around him for petty reasons. That’s FAR different than having a a cocksure attitude, or as Jason would put it, SWAGGER. You can bet he’d take a room full of cocky players like Michael Irvin as long as they are not a locker room cancer. But for that matter, WHICH successful headcoach puts up with that crap? Landry? Nope. Jimmy Johnson? Hell no. Belichek? Not on your life. Truth is, EVERYONE wants TEAM players, not I players. Cocky comes with the territory if you consider yourself the best of the best and have the results to back it up.
Thanks J2r
Here’s where I think we part ways a bit;
He IS trying to mend his ways, as we witnessed with the release of TO, one of his pets, coupled with this years draft, a very UN-Jerry draft.
I think the T.O. thing was all Stephen. I don’t think Jerry wanted to do it and I’m not sure he doesn’t regret it after seeing him play pretty well in Cincy. No way to know, but I don’t believe Jerry made that decision himself any more than I think the decision to fire Wade mid-season wasn’t also heavily influenced by his son.
That’s FAR different than having a a cocksure attitude, or as Jason would put it, SWAGGER. You can bet he’d take a room full of cocky players like Michael Irvin as long as they are not a locker room cancer.
I disagree. I think he is still smarting from that whole thing and he wants a locker room that doesn’t know how to do anything but say, “how high” when the coach says “jump”. The problem is that he ISN’T Jimmy Johnson and, maybe to his credit, knows that he doesn’t have the kind of personality that could overcome more vocal guys with big egos. In interviews, you can’t tell if a guy is going to stay after practice and catch passes from the second string QB. You just can’t. I’ve interviewed over a thousand candidates in my career and there’s a limit in what you can glean from a 60-minute interaction like that. I truly believe, at this moment, that anyone who doesn’t come across like a Miles Austin isn’t getting tabbed by JG until he thinks he has no choice but to take a risk…or has a locker room full of leaders who have drank his kool aid so to speak. No way would Irvin have come across in a pre-draft interview as a guy that JG would want this early in his culture-building process.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
And I don't buy the whole draft thing
2009 wasn’t glitzy either. But it was all Jerry.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Nice post with only one error
It’s actually highly likely that Romo will be the starting qb in 2015 as he will will only be 35. Keep in mind Manning is 34 and he’s at the top of his game. Warner retired at that age but was at the top of his game at that time.
I see Romo possibly retiring sometime after 2017…he simply loves the game far too much to retire earlier.
In Romo we Trust
Thanks Terry...and where have you been?
You may be right about the Romo thing, but consider this…
Manning has missed what % of scheduled starts due to injury?
Compare that to Romo.
Truly, I don’t like comparing anyone to Manning because it’s ridiculous. No one should have to stand up to that measurement.
Manning is 6’5", 240 lbs. and seldom has taken so few big hits in his career it is uncanny.
Romo has spent his time running from opponents and gotten concussed, had pinkie and shoulder issues as a result.
Manning is the most prolific QB (based on games played) ever. He’s in the conversation for best ever.
Romo last left the field the QB of a 1-7 team.
Highly likely? I don’t know about that. You’ll have to provide supporting arguments beyond just comparing him to the best in the game.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
"No one should have to stand up to that measurement."
No one other than the starting Quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys.
An individual who should always be measured against the “best”. Even when they’re the same person. If they’re not, it should fuel their competitive fire. If not, time to get that replacement in the game.
Like it nor not.
Ahh, defining better, best, bestest…
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
btw, wager those “supporting arguments” you’re seeking from that source either don’t come or aren’t factual.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
That's the reason I asked for them
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Well, Terry and I both agree on fixing the O-line as the primary need on this team
…unlike FiTaT, who must be apoplectic after Dallas’ war room (and some of his favorite blockquote sources) obviously disagreed with his cure-for-insomnia statistical argument to draft defense early and often.
Terry and I also agreed that trading down for an extra 2nd, taking Castonzo and potentially trading back up into the late 1st would have been a good plan.
But we see Romo quite differently at times. Saying he’ll be here until 2015 is a big stretch IMO.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
We have to face facts
Romo is not going to be mentioned in that group of “best ever” QB’s. I just don’t see it given his time horizon and this team’s distance from being able to make a Super Bowl run.
He’s more likely to be mentioned with Matt Schaub as part of a groupof prolific passers during an era of throwing the ball a lot.
I think we used to believe he could leapfrog guys like Rivers and Rogers, but every year those guys, who are yonger than Tony, get better and better. Romo’s ceiling may have been reached (in 2009) and maybe now he has to win games like more of a game manager than a game breaker.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
I said "No one other than the starting Quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys"
And I mean “No one other than the starting Quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys” “should have to stand up to that measurement”. For the reason stated. Couldn’t care less what the name is.
Regarding Romo, perhaps he won’t be mentioned in that “best ever” QB group. Perhaps for the reasoning you provide, in part or whole. It’s likely he may not make it into the Montana/Manning/et al debate.
But facts? Fact is the evidence isn’t fully in yet. Wonder what tune people’d sing in the admittedly unlikely event he won 5 blings in a row. Even 3. With maintaining the peers-stats performance level displayed to date.
Fact is, unless you’ve glimpsed the future or have the benefit of time travel forward beyond the constraints the rest of us are faced with having to wait for it to happen, you just don’t know for a certainty. Facts are a certainty. The rest’s speculation.
I’ll wait for facts. I like it that way. I like watching a game live, without knowing the final score beforehand. Keeps life interesting.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
Do you have a financial portfolio that includes stocks and funds?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
I don't think JG was afraid of TO's mouth and personality at all during that time
period. I think he just decided to keep quiet as he was not the HC. Its the HC’s responsibility to put down the kind of issues that arose during the TO era. It was obvious that the then HC never did that and allowed TO to become the cancer that he was in his previous stops. Besides, JG played on Cowboys teams that had players with very boisterous attitudes and mouths on them so I would say he’s kinda used to it to a certain degree. Now don’t get me wrong I like and respect TO as a player but it’s no coincidence that everywhere TO went it the same thing happened.
I think now that JG is in control things will be different.
Will it?
I’m anxious to see what happens when Dez has a meltdown on the sideline 8 minutes into the second quarter, they’re losing by 14 and he’s only been targeted once for an incompletion.
What do you think JG will do? How will he react?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
What has you say that?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Side point: Dez has yet to prove value worthy of the least tolerance of such antics
As much as he’s impressed me at times, those glimpses aren’t enough to make someone above reproach. Not even close. Not with all the Dez-supporters wailings. He ain’t no Irvin yet. Even if he was, take a seat. One more peep, one look , one irritation, it’s 2 games.
Please define meltdown. Detrimental incident or merely a passionate display? Given your example it could be handled multiple ways. Seemingly continue unperturbed and deal with a warning in private (1st time), which is what I would anticipate. Assistants are to handle such things during a game, rein the player in, decisively. If the HC needs do more than look, cast the appropriate glance, literally speak to a player about such behavior, it’s pine time.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
I agree
He’s a newbie.
What the team and the HC do while he’s a newbie will define the parameters for what is, and more importantly is not, acceptable within the cultural boundaries on this team.
My worry is that JG is not a seasoned HC, he doesn’t have a big personality and he doesn’t have a locker room that can handle that kind of thing within its 4 walls yet.
Dez may be a time bomb ready to go off during the season if he’s not soon defused.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Which would you have (not both): Regulations or the sense of a thing? In other words, codified laws or the concept of right/wrong?
Seasoning comes in many forms. The recipe need not always be the same. To restrict the Cowboys’ HC options to “seasoned HC” is limitiing. I doubt anyone would serisouly consider devling further down the chain than the collegiate ranks, so call it pro or near-pro (NFL, CFL, UFL, NCAA and such). Shame those OC/DC’s aren’t worthy of consideration. Sorry, Tom, you’re just not qualified.
Personality? Comes in many forms. Look around. Not every “big personality” is a worthy leader. Don’t use hindsight, as it’s clouded by a name being prominent by having become an acknowledged leader. Some leaders you never hear of. Leadership has many effective forms and is a morpheus thing very much dependent on the milieu within which it exists. One might say morpheusly inspirational. I use the term “morpheus” intentionally, with meaning far removed from current cultural “icons”. Many people have spoken of leadership, its attributes, the whole of the thing, yet inspiring to dream, to be more seems a common thread.
Team? 4 walls? Perhaps what is happening on whatever field of a more youthful time, whichever field of dreams, behind whatever highschool, will provide that team, in that locker room, within those 4 walls you speak of.
As much as it’s about Dez, it’s not. As much as it’s about your fondness for a time past, it’s not. As much as it’s about winning a game, even the season’s last, it’s not.
I ask you: What were Jimmy’s most important words in his “How ’bout dem Cowboys!” speech?
It’s about a team. The team.
btw, please answer the “Jimmy’s most important words” question. Thanks.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
Which one Tan?
I may be wrong but weren’t there 2 of them?
1 right after the 92 NFC championship and 1 after the Super Bowl?
With the 9th Pick Dallas Selects Tyron Smith...Romo Weeps in Joy, and Bennet says"I might get to go out in the Pass Pattern now!"
by I am Ironman!!! on May 15, 2011 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions
92 NFC Championship
You’ll have me digging out SB XXVII videotapes to check whether he uttered them in any televised post-SB-win comments. Don’t recall it if he did, was far too drunk, celebratory, dealing with party-guests harassments, congrats, fun of the moment, noise and caught up in pure unadulterated pleasure to have caught it then. And the after-the-last-guest-was-gone, the sit-and-have-a-beer re-watching of the game alone, to drink it in, was so long ago I may have forgotten him doing so, saying it again. They’ve sat unwatched since that night.
And yes, videotapes. We used primitive tape technology. And thanked our lucky Stars we had it.
So I’m not calling you wrong, just saying I don’t recollect 2.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
I'd say where he refers to the work they did in minicamps and in Austin when they were so tired
…which reaffirmed why they worked so hard.
My favorite line was, “You realize we DO have one more game to play”
:-)
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
With all due respect, I disagree...
See 0:56-0:58sec, “Every single one of ya”.
As much as the “hard work” phrase typified the man’s methods, I remain an advocate his team-building prowess, the psychological comprehensions and manipulation of his charges, was Jimmy’s greatest strength. And that this comment, this single phrase, spoke more to and of his legacy than the “How ’about dem Cowboys!” has come to mean to us fans.
Imagine being the least member of that squad, the bench-warmingest Rudy, hearing that. Coach’s talking to me, to all of us, but to me too. That makes a team, my friend, top to bottom. That is a team, when it’s top to bottom. Baby-faced Troy on the verge of… – history… – through each and every name to the least remembered, most overlooked member of that T-e-a-m.
They’d have walked through fire due to that man after that speech, due to what he built them all to be together and believe about themselves. And felt nary a singe. Bring on the Bills.
Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong. But… – I’m not.
The “realize we DO have one more game to play” still brings a smile, Just like then. Man, them were the days, eh.
How ’bout dem…
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
He was a psychology major and put his learnings to good use
To each their own.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
He was capable of independent thought and evaluation
Seeing talented individuals work hard at a team sport and fail at achieving the ultimate objective would tell you what?
You don’t think he worked his Hurricanes/Cowboys hard, his Cowboys/Dolphins hard?
Nope, not “to each their own”. Not on this. It’s a team sport. Period. Hard work ain’t at the heart of a team.
As much as Irvin worked hard, something more, something beyond such things made him Brimstone.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
Yes, I just don't know how you quantify/qualify that in a pre-draft interview
Jimmy knew about Irvin from first-hand experience.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
You don't
What we speak of isn’t a quantifiable/qualifable thing. It’s not a measurement, not a stat, not a nailed-down certainty. You know this.
Just like building a team to winning the last game of the season’s not.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
He will let his WR coach Robinson do his job and explain to the young man his tantrum won’t help his team or his # of reps in the offense…maybe even bench him the next series. But that’s just a guess. I think Garrett wouldn’t get involved unless it became a real (repetitive) issue.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Garrett will be calling the plays, right?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Sure
But targets and plays called aren’t the same thing. It could be a defense is doing everything they can to keep Dez double covered so Romo simply finds the open guys instead of forcing things to Dez. I don’t see Garrett intentionally calling plays to limit Dez’s targets in a game.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
But Dez will know if he's the primary or not
…and if he thinks he is open and doesn’t get the ball, then what?
Maybe this is not even the right context. Maybe this is about Romo and Dez above all else.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Yeah
I guess I am just hoping that Dez learned from his mistake last year, and it was the one and only time we will have to worry about it…rumor has it he was complaining more about the ref’s call anyway, but who knows.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
That was my impression at the time.
Still is. Rumor aside. Simple eyeball eval. So no stats, no facts. Just eyes. And remembering what it was like playing a game, being subject to such circumstances, knowing the feeling and emotional context. The non-video-game reality, so to speak.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
Early on...
rumor was T.O. was a changed man in Dallas and he loved Romo.
Then…
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
That dynamic (QB/WR) should handle such things long before HC involvement
On any football field, any football team. If it gets to the sidelines, there’s a “problem”. If the HC gets involved, it should be one step from being cut. Period.
So I think you’ve hit the point, it’s more Romo/Bryant, Romo/Austin, Romo/Witten than JG. If Dad stops the car…
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
Excellent work ( yet again) Blings,
you know i’m an optimist concerning Coach Garrett and his long-term plan for the Cowboys.
let’s see how it all plays out.
Davie Wilson
"how bout them cowboys"!!!
Thank you sir
I welcome your optimism and applaud it.
Me? I think the best thing I can say is that I’m hopeful.
Some of this is just so much bigger than Garrett and being a first-time HC (at any level) in Dallas brings with it a lot of questions.
I hope they solve this labor crap so we can see it all play out.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
I remember 5B,
When you or O.C.C. said to me that we needed micromanagement at HC. We did def get it. Prob one of the smartest HCs in the league. Also,
the Cowboys’ brain trust, and I use that term loosely,
Nice…
To this day I have no idea what that woman was singing about. Like, literally no idea. I don’t know what a hollaback girl is. But I have to imagine it is a foul, disease ridden thing that wears too much make-up just to cover up the fact that it is a forty-seven year-old fish dog. – Family guy
by BlueNSilverBlood on May 14, 2011 8:37 AM CDT reply actions
Perhaps you missed a couple of points in your analysis, Bling.
When you mentioned that no one has to overcome the Joe Montana led 49ers, I believe there was more to flesh out of that statement. That dynasty, with it’s interchangeable parts at all positions, was in fact, a cerebral team. They had a cerebral coach, who envisioned a new offense, that knew how to draft talent, that believed in high character guys, and basically steam-rolled the NFL for a decade. Aside from Haley for 3 of their 5 Super Bowls, they didn’t have a nasty player. Yes, they had Lott, but he was more about talent than meanness. Well, okay, maybe he was a nice balance between nastiness and talent. In essence, they were more cerebral than nasty.
Now look at the first Garrett-led draft, they went with offense, with the general consensus being that Garrett needed players to run the type of offense he wanted to run. I think we all know that Garrett wants to go down field more than the 49ers did, but I see them putting an offense together that won’t be stopped. I don’t think he’s finished building his offensive line, rather, he’s just getting started. Perhaps he has the most difficult part in place with the bookend tackles.
Finally, let’s face it, he IS drafting players with a mean streak. That is one of his profiles, he is just choosing players with a nasty streak on the field, not on the sideline. Though we only drafted a couple of defensive players this past April, I think we got great value in the ones we did draft. Garrett may be exerting more influence on Jerry than anyone since Jimmy. The evidence is that for the first time in decades, they went offense bigtime in the draft. The Cowboys personality is changing. The days of a defense stacked with first round draft choices may be gone. And I still insist that Jerry is listening to Garrett.
Now for a couple of outliers. I think the most significant draft choice in the NFC East since Troy Aikman has occurred. It is Dez Bryant. I believe he may be the greatest player drafted in a very long time. Also, the Cowboys are serious about defense, but if I’m reading Garrett correctly, he intends to place an emphasis on outscoring their opponents.
I really appreciate your hesitance to go all-in here. It’s good for someone like myself, that tends to blindly buy into whatever the Cowboys do. This was a really well-written piece, and the format was well-conceived.
Rec’d.
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you've got an electrical problem.
Thanks for taking the time to comment
As always, WW, I value your thoughts on my musings.
So here, to a large extent, is where I think we disagree;
Aside from Haley for 3 of their 5 Super Bowls, they didn’t have a nasty player.
Sadly, I spent much of my youth in the Bay area and had to live through the 49er dyanasty, so I’m probably closer to these things than most. simply put, they had a bunch of mean and nasty guys on each of the Championship-winning teams. Those players weren’t the most notable on the team, so you probably got little chance to hear about them.
Guys like Jack “Hacksaw” Reynolds, Dan Bunz ( I met him and he frightened me), Carlton Williamson and Keith Fahnhorst were all badasses in the truest sense of the word. They gave the Niners a toughness that belied their cerebral reputation. Those guys would be the ones to try and put you in the hospital. Another guy who I recall being a brutal blocker was Bill Ring.
Guys like Jimn Stuckey, Michael Carter (who I recall also being one of the strongest guys in the NFL at that time and the aforementioned Lott were all nasty too. In fact, that secondary with Wright, Williamson, Hicks and Lott was a lot like Dallas’ secondary in the 70’s led by Harris and Waters.
I don’t know if I can agree with you about the Cowboys draft. Time will tell, but I don’t know that guys like Carter and Murray are known for being nasty. Tyron Smith? Not from anything I’ve read. And keep in mind, finishing plays, which is what they seem to like about Smith is not an indication of nastiness. I’m talking about the kind of ferocity that few players are known for. The guys want to hit you so hard that your teeth rattle and you flinch next time they come for you.
Time will certainly tell on this front.
As for the Cowboys’ personality changing, I think you’re right. I just can’t tell how. People WANT to believe that JG has a ton of sway on the decisions made on personnel and such, but I don’t know. As I said earlier, if the team struggles at some point, it will be interesting to see how JJ plays it with his young and inexperienced HC.
I’m interested to hear you say more about Dez. FOr me, I am worried about the kid. His talent is awe-inspiring, but so was T.O.‘s back in the day (and I apologize for the comparison, but mercurial WR’s that have issues do have a poster child). This guy has a ton of issues swirling around him and I don’t think he has a support system, and teams are crazy to think they can ever serve in that role, to help him mature fast enough to keep up with the challenges that come with his newfound wealth and fame. I hope I am wrong, but…
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Again, with all due respect,...
“Sadly, I spent much of my youth in the Bay area and had to live through the 49er dyanasty…”
I disagree. I’d say Luckily to your Sadly. As difficult as it’d be for a Cowboys fan, to be there, to witness and feel history, that history, even that history, being made, as hard as it’d be from ’82 onwards, look at the feel and insight being there gave.
Remember how January 17, 1993 felt? Daybreak to end. Bet if the feeling could be compared the one from having been there was sweeter.
btw, where were you that day?
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.
Pacific Heights area of SF
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Like I was seeing greatness
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Yeah, I was thinking of those guys as I wrote.
Hacksaw, Keena Turner, Dwight Hicks and his hot licks. Those 49er teams had some underrated defenses. I think my point got a little muddled. The point that I missed making in all the jumble is that the 49ers were a smart team. They had an innovative offense, a system, which was really important, because you could plug and play with whomever was on the roster. I was trying to draw an analogy to what Garrett is doing. I think he’s cerebral, and trying to build an offense that will withstand the test of time. Here comes those dreaded words….I hope.
And regarding whether we’re looking for players with mean streaks, that was probably a poor choice of words. You’re right, I don’t see it in Smith or Carter. But I do see a ruggedness in Murray. And I do see the grit in our day 3 draftees. I think Garrett may have a formula. If he can’t get a player with the talent he wants, he’s going for players that have the tools he wants. Good men, finishers, guys that like to knock you down. Hey I could be all wrong here, but maybe there is a formula. Talent in upper rounds, grit in lower rounds.
In the end, I believe he wants a smart offense. An offense that can execute a smart man’s design. At least…I hope that’s what I’m seeing.
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you've got an electrical problem.
You know...
“grit” may just be the perfect word to describe what he is looking for in his player additions.
I like that.
You may have just given me the next idea for a post!
I agree that JG has an idea of what he wants the offense to look like. Hopefully, it involves a new O-line.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
The defense may have gotten blown out several games
But, I do think JG wants to fix a stagnant offense. Games like the first Washington game where its a close game but we simply can’t put up enough points to win are unacceptable.
+1
I agree with your point about JG wanting to upgrade that unit’s personnel.
My points are simply these;
Dallas hasn’t had issues with skill positions as much as they have had breakdowns in key moments by their O-line. The draft did not appear to me to be a concerted effort and commitment to bringing in the best possible young talent for that unit.
Second, I ask if it was the right strategy. They went heavy on offense, but was there really that great a value in taking both Carter and Murray over trench guys on either side of the ball? In this regard (a demonstrated lack of investment in both the offensive and defensive lines for many years in favor of LB’s, TE’s and RB’s), is this really a departure from the draft strategies of old or was Smith really just a 1st round concession Jerry made to JG to get him to shut up about the line and the rest of the draft like all the rest under JJ?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
I think Carter was both value and drafting for the future
It wasn’t only the Cowboys saying he was top rated talent. Was that true for Lee last year? With Murray, I think its very simple. They don’t think Choice is that great, and they want Barber gone. However, if Barber is still here when the season begins, I think you can go ahead and worry.
Have they actually SEEN enough of Choice to know how good he is?
I haven’t.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Personally what I did see of him made me think Barber was better than him.
And we all know how everyone feels about Barber
Hmmm
How do people feel about Barber?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
In the end...
(Link’s to a 983×1512px 215Kb version)
You want to believe, be you like Blings, a questioner, or others, an outright doubter, naysayer or the like. Or, like some (one?), only one to believe what you see in your dawg’s eyes.
You want to, it’s just not easy. Not easy to give your heart, your hope, your belief, not when its been abused, tread on, beaten up, beaten down, torn and twisted so many ways you’ve lost count.
You want to believe. The way you believed when they went up to that first frozen tundra. Or when Roger strode out onto the field down a score with under 2 to play. Or when Tom’s arms-folded cool stood on the sideline.
Maybe, for some, the way you felt hearing "How ‘bout dem Cowboys!" vanquish the agony of The Catch’s subsequent plays. Or seeing Emmitt take your hopes, your belief on one shoulder (yes, that one, the hurtin’ right one), the team on the other and give you reason yet again to believe.
Yep, you want to. It’s just not easy.
In the end, you want to believe. Or is that “In the beginning…”
Ya gotta believe.
Gentlemen, we’re 0-16. Let’s change that.

by 
























