Who Won More Games For The 2010 Cowboys: Offense or Defense?
Think back to the opening day 7-13 loss against the Redskins last season. Obviously, what stands out from that game is the penalty called against Alex Barron that negated a winning TD pass to Roy Williams on the last play of the game.
But as I was mentally reviewing that game, I began to wonder whether that game hadn't been lost much earlier. If you look at the final score, one could argue that the offense lost that game, because scoring only 7 points is not a good offensive performance by any measure, while allowing only 13 points on one fumble return and two field goals is a pretty good defensive performance.
This in turn got me thinking about the entire season, and whether there was a way to quantify which unit, offense or defense, was more responsible for the Cowboys' 2010 record. One way to understand that is to look at 'wins over average' for each unit, and that's what we'll do after the jump.
'Wins over average' is a metric developed by Doug Drinen at Pro-football-reference.com (PFR) in a post on adjusting QB records. I've taken his approach and modified it slightly to look at total offense and total defense. This is how it works:
'Wins over average' looks at an historic average to determine how likely it is that an offense will score more points relative to the points allowed by the defense. For example, if your defense allows only 10 points, you can reasonably expect your offense to win that game by scoring more points. If your defense were to allow 30 points though, it's a lot harder for an offense to win the game. And vice versa.
To determine the historic average, I've crunched the numbers for all NFL teams for the last five years in the table below, so that's 80 regular season games for each of the 32 teams for a total of 2,558 scores (minus one tied game). I've formed five clusters by points allowed/points scored and looked at the winning percentages for each.
One team's points scored is the other team's points allowed, so the table below contains the same numbers for offense and defense, just reversed.
| Offense vs Points Allowed | Defense vs Points Scored | |||||||||
| 0-10 | 11-17 | 18-24 | 25-31 | 32+ | 0-10 | 11-17 | 18-24 | 25-31 | 32+ | |
| W/L record | 426-27 | 391-162 | 305-333 | 128-368 | 29-389 | 27-426 | 162-391 | 333-305 | 368-128 | 389-29 |
| Win % | .940 | .707 | .478 | .258 | .069 | .060 | .293 | .532 | .749 | .936 |
How to read the table: An NFL offense almost always (426-27) scores more points than the other team if the defense holds that team to ten points or less. The NFL average winning percentage is .940 in that situation. At the other end of the spectrum, when your defense allows 32 points or more, your offense is hardly ever (29-389) able to outscore the opposing team. And the same is true for the defense, only in reverse: when the offense scores 10 points or less, the defense almost always allows more points to the opponent (27-426) for a meager .060 winning percentage. The more points the offense scores, the more likely it obviously that the defense will hold the opponent to fewer points.
2010 Cowboys offense and wins over average: Now that we've established the average winning percentage in the NFL for each points bracket, we can look at how the 2010 Cowboys performed against that average. The Cowboys have a record of 2-1 in three games in which the defense allowed between 18 and 24 points (35-19 win against the Lions, 33-20 win against the Giants, 21-24 loss against the Vikings). The average NFL team would be expected to win 1.4 out of those three games in this points bracket (3 games x .478). By winning two of the three games, the Cowboys recorded 0.6 wins over average in this bracket. Doing the same exercise across all brackets in the table below, the 2010 Cowboys offense therefore gets 0.9 wins over average.
| 2010 Dallas Cowboys Offense | ||||||
| Points allowed |
0-10 | 11-17 | 18-24 | 25-31 | 32+ | Total |
| W/L record | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 6-10 |
| Wins over average |
0 | -0.1 | +0.6 | -0.3 | +0.7 | 0.9 |
Small sample size warning: doing this exercise with only 16 games is a little bit shaky from a statistical point of view. But hey, it is what it is. If you don't like it, go to Goodell and ask for more regular season games.
2010 Cowboys defense: We use the same approach with the defense. The Cowboys offense scored between 25 and 31 points 5 times last season (26 against the Cardinals, 27 each against the Eagles, Saints, Texans and Titans). Scoring that amount of points should normally be enough to win, and in fact, the average NFL team would be expected to win 3.7 out of those 5 games (5 games x .749). But the Cowboys only won one of those five games, so the Cowboys defense gets -2.7 wins above average (or below average in this case) in this points bracket. Across all brackets, the wins over average total -4.1 for the defense as per the table below:
| Dallas Cowboys Defense | ||||||
| Points Scored |
0-10 | 11-17 | 18-24 | 25-31 | 32+ | Total |
| W/L record | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 6-10 |
| Wins over average |
-0.1 | 0.4 | -1.0 | -2.7 | -0.7 | -4.1 |
So statistically, the Cowboys offense generated more wins over average than the defense. If you take an 8-8 record as your average, the offense played roughly like a 9-6 team while the defense played roughly like a 4-12 team.
If you watched any of the games last year this should not come as any kind of a surprise, and you might wonder why we would to prove something with numbers that was so painfully obvious to the naked eye anyway. Heck, it's the offseason, we're in a lockout, what are we going to do? It's not like we have breaking news rolling in by the hour.
42 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
And was it all scheme?
Because we sure didn’t draft like a 4-12 defense. Yikes.
Don't believe everything you think.
yeah,
One of my beefs with the draft was that it was kind of lukewarm. If we got OG in 3rd or S in 2nd it would feel more like we pursued our obvious needs. We needed an ILB (for sure next year,) and I love Murray, but I do have to keep telling myself that at least we got aggressive football players.
I personally believe our D is better than it played last year. Prob not as good as end of ’09, which I can live with considering our offense.
To this day I have no idea what that woman was singing about. Like, literally no idea. I don’t know what a hollaback girl is. But I have to imagine it is a foul, disease ridden thing that wears too much make-up just to cover up the fact that it is a forty-seven year-old fish dog. – Family guy
by BlueNSilverBlood on May 23, 2011 7:21 AM CDT up reply actions
Wow, OCC
First time I ever saw you make an error, man. The ’Boys D did not give up a TD in wk 1. Choice fumbe return by hall was TD. Are you becoming a Garrett apologist, wiping that one from the history books ;)
To this day I have no idea what that woman was singing about. Like, literally no idea. I don’t know what a hollaback girl is. But I have to imagine it is a foul, disease ridden thing that wears too much make-up just to cover up the fact that it is a forty-seven year-old fish dog. – Family guy
by BlueNSilverBlood on May 23, 2011 6:59 AM CDT reply actions
I think special teams needs to be factored into the equation.
The Vikings loss, the Titans loss, and the Cardinals loss all had pivotal moments in the special teams: which were not that special for Dallas. Harvin returned the second half kickoff for a touchdown in Minnesota. The Titans had at least one big return that led to points, and Buehler missed an extra point against the Giants (win) and the Cardinals (loss).
I am wondering how these statistics differ if you take an idea from an old post and determine the effectiveness of the defense given a certain field position. I remember you writing something about how likely a score was in relation to field postion and gains.
I expect that you will still find that the defense stunk in 2010, but that the special teams did too.
Yeah, I’ll dig up those posts and see whether it’s worth looking at them again. Sadly, when your team finished 6-10, it’s not a lot of fun digging through the stats. I’m not terribly excited about seeing just how bad the ’Boys were again, and again, and again…
by One.Cool.Customer on May 23, 2011 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Don't feel obliged...it was just a suggestion for a post.
I would like to try to quantify the importance of each position on the offense and defense. For instance, most people agree that the quarterback is the most important position on the team. Teams with great quarterbacks generally do well; but how about left tackles, inside linebackers, or safeties?
If I could come up with a metric to measure the impact of a great safety on a defense, it would be interesting. Any thoughts?
Couple of thoughts
For the stat hound: Burke’s EPA or WPA could be one option. You could look at entire position groups and figure out the positional EPA or WPA.
For the economist: Go by supply and demand and look at player salaries to determine e.g. the average top 10 salary per position.
For a one-size fits all approach: Look at Approximate Value from Profootballreference.
by One.Cool.Customer on May 23, 2011 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions
Dude, that's just wierd.
Anyone who pays attention knows that ScarletO is O.C.C.‘s alter ego. How crazy do you have to be to scheme about future posts with youself?
To answer your question, ScarletO.C.C., Grade a squad’s total performance; defense would consist of 3&outs, Big plays given, TD given, FG given, RZ efficiency, Pass YPA, TO generated, Points scored, 1st and 4th quarter performance(most important Defensive quarters IMO,) and 3rd and 4th down efficiency.
Take the metrics and see what positions winning teams are strong at. How important is your all-star S or LB play, or reliable CB play. That would require knowing who was in for each play and averaging playing time.
To this day I have no idea what that woman was singing about. Like, literally no idea. I don’t know what a hollaback girl is. But I have to imagine it is a foul, disease ridden thing that wears too much make-up just to cover up the fact that it is a forty-seven year-old fish dog. – Family guy
by BlueNSilverBlood on May 23, 2011 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions
forgot
Have to obtain total player ratings based on average of all available pundits’ opinions.
To this day I have no idea what that woman was singing about. Like, literally no idea. I don’t know what a hollaback girl is. But I have to imagine it is a foul, disease ridden thing that wears too much make-up just to cover up the fact that it is a forty-seven year-old fish dog. – Family guy
by BlueNSilverBlood on May 23, 2011 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions
Good point
Iam hoping that Garrett’s emphasis on versatile, hard-working “football guys” will also pay dividends on STs.
Don't believe everything you think.
Well, he did say
Heck, it’s the offseason, we’re in a lockout, what are we going to do? It’s not like we have breaking news rolling in by the hour.
That tells me he is bored and needs a project. :)
Hey Cool, great post
It seems to me that, as several have suggested above re: special teams, we have to look at defensive TDs. So, in the Colts game, the Dallas “D” had two touchdown returns of interceptions (as well as a third that led to the winning FG). So, in effect, the offense didn’t score 38 points, but 21-24, depending on how you want to factor what constitutes a “score.”
I’m thinking what this analysis might reveal is that the offense wasn’t as good as their scoring indicated, while the defense and special teams were about as bad as we thought they were…
Perhaps. But I think it balances out. In 2010 the Cowboys scored 106 points off takeaways and gave up 107 points on giveaways.
Plus, what you’re asking is way more work than I want to invest :-)
by One.Cool.Customer on May 23, 2011 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions
except for tunovers... which made our offense look better than it actually was...
when a team can’t score without help it makes a D very frustrated…
OCC,
everyone’s to blame for last years debacle. The OL, Romo’s injury, the entire defense except D Ware and Rat, Wade especially; I could go on, but the sense that I got watching the games was that the team in general gave up, had a defeatest attitude until Wade was fired. They played well below their talent level. It truly was depressing to watch. I generally feel that a head coach shouldn’t be fired in mid season, but not last year. Wade lost this team because of his weak personality. So, I guess I place most of the blame on Wade and his coaches for last year’s failures.
Love this!
Great, great post.
The questions I am seeing give even more credence tot he idea that it is nearly impossible to use macro-level statistics to tell you why games were won and lost. You have to look at the game-changing events through the lens of the particular in-game context at the time of their occurence.
As I see it, we found ways to lose lat year that were novel. We also saw some of the same issues that plagued us in prior seasons.
What scares me is this; if you are right and the defense played like a 4-12 unit, then one has to wonder how much different (aka better) that group will be this year given that we’re likely to see more first-time starters coupled with a new DC. The other thing is that we did not create much reason for optimism given that our draft leaned heavily toward offense. Maybe Free Agency brings a significant talent upgrade across the DL and secondary, but what if it doesn’t?
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
What if it doesn't?
Then we still have the miracle-worker Rob Ryan, you infidel!
by One.Cool.Customer on May 23, 2011 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions
The guy who hasn't been able to work with his players yet?
Can’t wait to see those new week 1 wrinkles!!!
:-)
BTW, need your editing help on my latest tome.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
our secondary has to significantly improve
or it will continue to play like a 4-12 unit
In Romo we Trust
I think a lot of that is Campo
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
+1
Under Campo it seems our CBs are always playing poor technique and seldom are looking for the ball.
AND YELLING AT EACH OTHER!!!
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Do you think Campo will improve/change working under RR?
The way RR interchanges LBs and DBs, why did we keep a coach (Campo) so old and set in his ways? Campo’s been coaching since 1971, and has been a secondary coach (or higher) since 1990.
Shouldn’t we have brought in some young blood more open to change and innovation?
"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass....... and I am all out of bubblegum" - George Nada
by fan since '65 on May 23, 2011 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions
The simple answer, at least in my eyes, is...
Yes, we should have brought in a new coach for that unit.
There’s been too many mental errors there and it didn’t matter who was playing.
I’ve been asking for Campo to be put out to pasture for some time now.
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
But they must not think so because
it would have been the perfect time to dump him. Like you, I keep thinking it’s coaching but what if the players are really that dumb? As in unteachably dumb.
Don't believe everything you think.
No way are ALL of them that dumb
"You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone who will never be able to repay you."
- John Wooden (God rest his soul)
Would'nt attempt to defend Campo,
but JJ’s loyalty only goes so far. While RR probably had little say in the matter of keeping Campo, I’d be surprised if JJ didn’t rum this by him. In any event, we’ve drafted defense heavily over the last 6 years or so, and I can’t help but believe that there’s talent there. The law of averages would support this. I only hope RR can bring this talent to bear. You’d think he would have influence over how Campo will coach the secondary. All is good until we see otherwise as the season unfolds.
Regarding finding novel ways to lose: If I ever see an excessive celebration penalty again, it'll be too soon.
Oh, and Roy, HOLD ON TO THE D(&^(&^&)(_&(^&&%& BALL! (Saints game)
The defense has been the problem with this team for quite a while
even though Romo gets the majority of the blame by many fans when the fact is Romo and the offense could easily lead us to 10-12 wins every single season and deep runs in the playoffs if we just had a good defense.
In Romo we Trust

by 

























