Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Eden Hazard In London For Medical, According To Reports

Is It Too Early To Talk About "Air Garrett"?

Tony Romo and Miles Austin looking forward to 2011.

Earlier this week, our own KD Drummond caused quite a stir with an article suggesting the Cowboys may have the best passing attack in the NFC East.

That premise was hotly debated and the discussion quickly veered off topic, so today we refocus on the Cowboys' passing game with the help of a few very simple stats.

1,000+ receiving yards in a season is a stat that is correctly labeled as a season milestone for a player who achieves it. When a player puts up those kinds of numbers, he was at least very successful, perhaps even dominant against most opponents.

Last season, 16 NFL teams had one player who caught more than 1,000 yards. One team had two players above the 1,000 yard receiving threshold. Care to take a guess which team that might have been? The Packers, Colts or Saints? Perhaps the Texans?

Star-divide

No, no, no and no.

The only team with two players who each had more than 1,000 receiving yards were the Dallas Cowboys. Miles Austin notched 1,041 yards, Jason Witten just barely made it with 1,002 yards. Not bad, considering the Cowboys played with their backup QB for most of the season in an offense that was far from fully operational.

But was 2010 just a fluke for the Cowboys? Let's extend the scope of this 1,000 receiving-yards analysis a little further, and look at the stats from 2006-2010. Off the top of your head, how many teams do you think had more 1,000-yard receivers than the Cowboys? More than three? More than five?

Before we answer that question, let's first look at how many and which Cowboys players exceeded 1,000 receiving yards over that period. That this period corresponds to Tony Romo's career as a starter for the Cowboys should not really come as a big surprise to anybody.

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Player Yards Player Yards Player Yards Player Yards Player Yards
Terrell Owens 1,180 Terrell Owens 1,355 Terrell Owens 1,052 Miles Austin 1,320 Miles Austin 1,041
Terry Glenn 1,047 Jason Witten 1,145  - -
 - -
Jason Witten 1,030 Jason Witten 1,002

The Cowboys have players 1,000 receiving yards nine times in the last five years. 2008 was the only year in which the Cowboys didn't have two players hit that statistical milestone.

So how does this compare in the division? Over the past five years, the Cowboys have more 1,000+ yard receivers than all three NFC East rivals combined: The Giants and Eagles each have three, the Redskins two since 2006. So much for that discussion.

Somewhat more surprising is the fact that there are actually five NFL teams who have not had a single player reach 1,000 receiving yards in the last five years: Chicago, Jacksonville, Oakland, San Francisco and Tennessee all came up empty in this category.

Back to the original question: how many teams had more 1,000 yard receivers than the Cowboys in the last five years? Not a single one. Here's the list.

No. of 1,000+ yard receivers
Team 2006-2010
Dallas 9
Arizona 8
Green Bay 7
Indianapolis 7
New England 6
Cincinnati 5
Denver 5

When asked by Sports Illustrated's Tim Layden in October 2007 to describe the foundation of his offense, Garrett leaned back and invoked the "Air" Coryell offense:

"It's what you would have to call the Coryell offense."

"If you brought Don Coryell to Dallas and handed him our playbook," said Garrett, "he would recognize an awful lot of stuff."

In 2011, Garrett may have one of the most potent passing offenses in the league at his disposal. Take a healthy Romo, Austin clicking with Romo, Witten continuing to be Mr. Reliable and Dez Bryant in full command of the playbook. Add an improved O-line and an elite WR-coach, and 2011 could see the Cowboys aerial attack reach dizzying levels.

In his season review of Miles Austin, Bob Sturm nicely summarized the dilemma opposing defenses will face against the Cowboys passing attack:

Austin demands a double-team, but with Bryant on the other side, there are some real classic conflicts that defenses will have to face. Safeties will be stressed and if pass protection is solidified, there is plenty of reason to believe in a bit of a fireworks show. Austin is not the best WR in football, but he is very good and quite explosive if he makes the first defender miss (which he often does with his strength). And the Cowboys dream of having co-#1's at WR may finally be coming true.

Is it too early to talk about "Air Garrett"?

And in case you were wondering, only five teams in the history of the NFL have had three players each totaling 1,000 or more receiving yards in the same season. The 2008 Cardinals, 2004 Colts, 1995 Falcons, 1989 Redskins and 1980 Chargers.

Comment 105 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This is exactly why Dez needs to stay healthy, without him on the otherside, our offense is completely different, it requires JG to change his whole game plan, and defenses are able to commit more to Witten, as well as the run game.

"I still feel like I have something to offer, and the cynical fan can really kiss my ass. I really don’t care. There’s a bunch of true fans and the people who actually want to take the time to get to know me know who I am. The guy who sits in his mom’s basement and types on his mom’s computer, I couldn’t really care less about." - Chipper Jones

by KJDH2154 on Jun 25, 2011 10:47 AM CDT reply actions  

they did just fine in 07 and 08

Tony Romo 2011's League's Most Valuable Player

by thebigham on Jun 25, 2011 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cause they had Owens…..

"I still feel like I have something to offer, and the cynical fan can really kiss my ass. I really don’t care. There’s a bunch of true fans and the people who actually want to take the time to get to know me know who I am. The guy who sits in his mom’s basement and types on his mom’s computer, I couldn’t really care less about." - Chipper Jones

by KJDH2154 on Jun 25, 2011 6:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

And austin...

But he was still a special teams guy. Credit Terry Glenn for 07, and we all remember 08. Perhaps that season’s failure can be attributes somewhat to our lack of a Coryell number 2 receiver.

by CotySaxman on Jun 25, 2011 7:04 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Glenn played none of the 07 season except the Giants game (a mistake, he wasn't ready yet, and neither was TO who also came off injury for that game).))

Crayton was the number 2 that year.

In 08 a whole lot of things went wrong, but we did acquire Roy Williams to be our new number 2 and to take over for TO eventually as the 1. That season is laid on the injury to Romo, the unnecessary distractions, and the utter cratering of the team at the end of the year (remember 44-6?)

by mdlusk on Jun 26, 2011 12:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

I stand corrected

I thought I just read an article listing glenn for 1000 yards in 07. Must have been 06. Sorry. Roy projected then similarly as Dez does now. Big and fast, ideal for this offense. Unfortunately for Crayton, his skillset is more in line with a number 3, slot man. Good routes, good hands, passable speed. Dwayne Harris, beta version, if you will. I missed most of the 07 + 08 seasons because of the Marine Corps. Haven’t missed a game since, other than last years washington shootout.

by CotySaxman on Jun 26, 2011 6:50 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

And we have miles now

This o can stil work if miles or dez goes down

Tony Romo 2011's League's Most Valuable Player

by thebigham on Jun 26, 2011 5:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Air Coryell Offense

Generally requires two outside deep threats, two versatile tight ends and a power running game. Three receiver sets are frequently used, as well, in order to force the defense into a nickel, which is more vulnerable to the run. Arguably the most important position is the tight end, as he is involved in every play as the wild card…6th blocker or 3rd receiver.
Finally, the quarterback doesn’t have to be an elite athlete to succeed. The ability to throw a deep ball and make quick decisions are all that are necessary.

by CotySaxman on Jun 25, 2011 7:00 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I know where you're coming from

But the key for the tight end is a run block, pass catch dual threat. Sean Chapas is more in that mould. The Coryell TE is called an H Back or F Back…ironically, Chris Gronkowski played H Back in college. His problem is that a Coryell Fullback has to be a pass blocker as well. He would be better as an off the line TE in our offense.
If you can’t tell, I’m thoroughly enamored by this system.

by CotySaxman on Jun 25, 2011 10:19 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

FANtastic article

I for one am ready to shout it from the rooftops!!! “Air Garret” here we come add in Murray and its gonna be crazy!

Roger: Hey, with this mortar launcher, we can get back at the kid who went all Tom Sizemore on your eye!
Steve: Oh, I wish I could get back at him. I'm gonna dress up as a girl and get him to have sex with me and then say "Ha! I'm not a girl! You just had sex with a boy that hates you!"
Roger: Yes, let's leave that plan between you, me, and the string of therapists who won't be able to help you.
American Dad

by Cowboys_Attack on Jun 25, 2011 11:05 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Way to harsh my mellow

I started out with nothing and still have most of it left

by Benthere on Jun 25, 2011 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I drink my Kool-Aid

From a half full glass thank you very much and it tastes delicious too! :) haha

Roger: Hey, with this mortar launcher, we can get back at the kid who went all Tom Sizemore on your eye!
Steve: Oh, I wish I could get back at him. I'm gonna dress up as a girl and get him to have sex with me and then say "Ha! I'm not a girl! You just had sex with a boy that hates you!"
Roger: Yes, let's leave that plan between you, me, and the string of therapists who won't be able to help you.
American Dad

by Cowboys_Attack on Jun 25, 2011 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pass the Kool Aid

I like mine nasty

Make sure you smell it before you eat it

by ol nasty on Jun 25, 2011 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice signature.

I normally just dive right in, though.

Give me UR calls! Give me highstepping by CBs and PRs entering the endzone! Give me screaming on the sidelines and headbutting! Give me Fortitude, Solidarity and VIOLENCE! Bring me CHAMPIONSHIPS!
Bring me Ridolin LOL! - B'nSB

by BlueNSilverBlood on Jun 25, 2011 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

you sick bastard

We're here to win football games. The way to do that is to tell him and to get on him at the right times. I do that when you guys (media) don't see and watch.''

What else makes a strong leader?

"You win,'' Romo said. "You're a very good leader once you win.

"That's' what we're going to do.''

by TARHEEL PAUL on Jul 1, 2011 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

referring to ol nasty..........

i can say it. im related to the bastard

We're here to win football games. The way to do that is to tell him and to get on him at the right times. I do that when you guys (media) don't see and watch.''

What else makes a strong leader?

"You win,'' Romo said. "You're a very good leader once you win.

"That's' what we're going to do.''

by TARHEEL PAUL on Jul 1, 2011 8:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

May need to change name to Pass_Attack

the more i think about it the more excited i get because as much as i don’t like the guy Williams was looking decent with Romo last year too so this season could be the greatest aerial attacks that we’ve seen in a long time. I can see Austin, Witten, Bryant with 1,000+ yards and Williams, Murray, and Philips with all above 500 yards Williams closer to 800 something. This would really help our redzone woah’s cuz we may not even get to the 20 before we score!
Please hear me owners and players stop this lockout madness and give us some FOOTBALL!!!

Roger: Hey, with this mortar launcher, we can get back at the kid who went all Tom Sizemore on your eye!
Steve: Oh, I wish I could get back at him. I'm gonna dress up as a girl and get him to have sex with me and then say "Ha! I'm not a girl! You just had sex with a boy that hates you!"
Roger: Yes, let's leave that plan between you, me, and the string of therapists who won't be able to help you.
American Dad

by Cowboys_Attack on Jun 25, 2011 11:23 AM CDT reply actions  

agreed.

I dont see felix having a 1000 rush yard season, but more like 800/600.

On a side note, anyone else having problems logging in with facebook via mobile? It doesnt even show up as an option.

Poor guitarist seeking love....
Likes: Long walks on the beach, Candlelit dinners - Ear Melting Metal and Def Rhymes.... Preferably all at once.

What is best in life?
"To Crush your enemies, See them driven before you and to hear the lamentation of their women!"

My Cover of Metallica's Classic "Master of Puppets"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8aDckMo6-Q
And here's my Tribute to Fade to Black
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keGjkAdbKqM

by Nick Castillo on Jun 25, 2011 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wow!!!

How many footballs will they be allowed to have on the field under the new rules? But, I do like your optimism!

by RenoCowboy on Jun 26, 2011 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's all about the Oline ,

if they can provide Romo with a consistent pocket to pass from,then Air-Garrett will be a reality.

Davie Wilson
"how bout them cowboys"!!!

by scotscowboyfan on Jun 25, 2011 12:03 PM CDT reply actions  

couldn't agree more

it absolutly is but i do think we have made some improvements with Smith and I’d love to see Arkin rise up too and be something special knock Bigg down from starter. will it happen i dont know but its what would take us to the next level. imo

Roger: Hey, with this mortar launcher, we can get back at the kid who went all Tom Sizemore on your eye!
Steve: Oh, I wish I could get back at him. I'm gonna dress up as a girl and get him to have sex with me and then say "Ha! I'm not a girl! You just had sex with a boy that hates you!"
Roger: Yes, let's leave that plan between you, me, and the string of therapists who won't be able to help you.
American Dad

by Cowboys_Attack on Jun 25, 2011 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is what worries me.

That due to the lockout Smith may not be ready and our other young OL guys are missing training time also. They need to be in there learning and getting ready to rock.

by Rena on Jun 25, 2011 5:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Smith will absolutely not be perfect this year

but i’m going to go ahead and predict he’ll do better than Colombo last year

by Specific on Jun 25, 2011 6:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll be surprised if Smith starts before mid season.

With the f-up off season, Smith won’t be ready for prime time day one

Lock n Load

by DIRE WOLF on Jun 25, 2011 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Colombo

was the one-legged man last year. And even that one leg wouldn’t flex at the knee. Smith has to be better on day one than that.

But, Colombo was better than Barron.

by RenoCowboy on Jun 26, 2011 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Week 1 is the Jets.

Really want to see that?

Give me UR calls! Give me highstepping by CBs and PRs entering the endzone! Give me screaming on the sidelines and headbutting! Give me Fortitude, Solidarity and VIOLENCE! Bring me CHAMPIONSHIPS!
Bring me Ridolin LOL! - B'nSB

by BlueNSilverBlood on Jun 26, 2011 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

The only issue I have with JG

Is he seems to get impatient. The 90’s teams he was part of used its passing attack to establish a lead and then used the running game to wear teams down with TOP and simple pounding. It’s almost as if he’s not comfortable until playing with a TD or more lead. And I think Romo is all too happy to be the trigger-man in that kind of attack.

I’m not being critical, I love this offense, it can be a potent and productive thing of beauty. But then you realize it’s the RHG that acts as the governor on this big, bad muscle car – and he just likes to drive fast.

I drink to make other people more interesting

by tdships on Jun 25, 2011 12:31 PM CDT reply actions  

true but...

We don’t have anything close to what the 90’s team had and that was Emmitt Smith! So yeah i can understand him wanting a td lead then maybe letting Felix run it a bit, I like Felix but come on he’s nowhere near that level. our running game has been getting rather stale and under used I’ll give ya that but i can sorta see why just sorta

Roger: Hey, with this mortar launcher, we can get back at the kid who went all Tom Sizemore on your eye!
Steve: Oh, I wish I could get back at him. I'm gonna dress up as a girl and get him to have sex with me and then say "Ha! I'm not a girl! You just had sex with a boy that hates you!"
Roger: Yes, let's leave that plan between you, me, and the string of therapists who won't be able to help you.
American Dad

by Cowboys_Attack on Jun 25, 2011 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

The line

has really not been the right type to enable a “grind it out” approach. To do that, they need some explosiveness, they need to execute consistently and they have to limit penalties. Far from being strengths, those are their primary weaknesses.

I think Garrett has tried to optimize what he has for personnel, rather than forcing his system to work despite some shortcomings. In his ideal world, he would combine his vertical passing game with a pounding running game. We saw glimpses of that already as he toughened up practices and ran even when the running game wasn’t overly productive.

Don't believe everything you think.

by dunkman on Jun 25, 2011 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

i totally agree escp. on the limiting penalties too many times i’ve seen a good gain be called back for holding it’s just unacceptable!

Roger: Hey, with this mortar launcher, we can get back at the kid who went all Tom Sizemore on your eye!
Steve: Oh, I wish I could get back at him. I'm gonna dress up as a girl and get him to have sex with me and then say "Ha! I'm not a girl! You just had sex with a boy that hates you!"
Roger: Yes, let's leave that plan between you, me, and the string of therapists who won't be able to help you.
American Dad

by Cowboys_Attack on Jun 25, 2011 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah, yes: the old run vs pass argument
The 90’s teams he was part of used its passing attack to establish a lead and then used the running game to wear teams down with TOP and simple pounding.

Give Garrett Emmitt Smith, Daryl Johnston, Mark Tuinei, Nate Newton, Mark Stepnoski, John Gesek, and Erik Williams to go along with their current passing attack. Then, let’s see whether Garrett mixes in a run now and then. Don’t forget, one of JG’s early teachers was Jimmy Johnson.

An OC calling running plays, and a team executing running plays aren’t the same thing.

by RenoCowboy on Jun 26, 2011 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Ah, hahahahaha

Word.

Give me UR calls! Give me highstepping by CBs and PRs entering the endzone! Give me screaming on the sidelines and headbutting! Give me Fortitude, Solidarity and VIOLENCE! Bring me CHAMPIONSHIPS!
Bring me Ridolin LOL! - B'nSB

by BlueNSilverBlood on Jun 26, 2011 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is one of the best statements I've seen in a LONG time
An OC calling running plays, and a team executing running plays aren’t the same thing.

Rec’d

"Be great today" - Jason Garrett

by mhuff13 on Jun 26, 2011 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't like Air Garrett, Air Garrett loses games

I think that the Cowboys offense is at its best when it can execute a strong dose of areal attack. However, when that is all that the offense does, it fails.

An extremely interesting bit of research done by Bob Sturm has shown that when the Cowboys go out in the obvious 3WR 1RB 1 TE passing set, they actually perform worse per attempt than their heavy running 2RB, 2TE, and 1WR set AND their base 2WR, 2TE, 1RB set. Why is this?

Because Garrett’s offense seems to perform best when there is a threat of a run. When the offense is an unstoppable juggernaut is when it’s Felix Jones for 5 yards, Felix Jones for 6 yards (first down), Felix Jones off of left tackle for 4 yards, then MILES AUSTIN 40 yard catch and run up the right sideline.

When it’s all passing, the defense can dial up all the crazy blitzes in the book to confuse our O-line, put Romo on his back, or force Romo to make a bad decision. When the defense is afraid of the run they can’t sell out to stop the pass. And when the safeties aren’t sure whether to comitt to the pass or the run and the defensive ends have to stay home to cover their running lanes instead of going right for Romo – that’s when this offense is the best in the NFL.

I don’t like Air Garrett. I like 60/40 Garrett. 60% passing, 40% running.

The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.

by Blue Eyed Devil on Jun 25, 2011 12:54 PM CDT reply actions  

sixty forty is still overly pass balanced if you dont like air offenses.

55/45 is a better split for a balanced offense

Poor guitarist seeking love....
Likes: Long walks on the beach, Candlelit dinners - Ear Melting Metal and Def Rhymes.... Preferably all at once.

What is best in life?
"To Crush your enemies, See them driven before you and to hear the lamentation of their women!"

My Cover of Metallica's Classic "Master of Puppets"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8aDckMo6-Q
And here's my Tribute to Fade to Black
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keGjkAdbKqM

by Nick Castillo on Jun 25, 2011 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

No argument here

What drives me nuts is when Garrett completely abandons the run unnecessarily like the 44 passing plays 14 running plays in the 2009 Packers game.

OCC may call him Air Garrett, but when he gets into that mode I think of him more as Madden XBOX Game Garrett.

The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.

by Blue Eyed Devil on Jun 25, 2011 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah, you never want to completely abandon the run

and I do agree that garret starts getting anxious with his playcalling when the run stops netting even marginal gains. Sometimes slinging it like were playing madden works, most other times it doesn’t so yeah you have a good point there.

Poor guitarist seeking love....
Likes: Long walks on the beach, Candlelit dinners - Ear Melting Metal and Def Rhymes.... Preferably all at once.

What is best in life?
"To Crush your enemies, See them driven before you and to hear the lamentation of their women!"

My Cover of Metallica's Classic "Master of Puppets"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8aDckMo6-Q
And here's my Tribute to Fade to Black
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keGjkAdbKqM

by Nick Castillo on Jun 25, 2011 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t like Air Garrett, Air Garrett loses games

When ‘Air Garrett’ is rolling it does not lose game.

The only way Dallas loses if the offense is passing well is if the defense is plays poorly. In which case the defense loses the game.

It was the same with the Greatest Show on Turf. The year their defense was good they won the SB. When their defense was weak, they didn’t win.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jun 25, 2011 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Allow me to point out the 2009 season

GB 17 DAL 7

That is the most obvious case of Garrett completely abandoning the run in his tenure as head coach and it was one of the worst offensive performances.

DAL 7 WAS 6

Defense completely bailed out a failed Garrett passing attempt. 19 passes out of shotgun looks yielded only 100 yards.

I don’t believe in 50/50 run/pass balance. What I believe in is the Cowboys being able to THREATEN equally with the run and the pass. I think that when the Cowboys operate in a way that tells the opponent “We are going to pass on this play” then the opponent can shut that pass down.

I think this performed best in the finale games against the Eagles where when the Eagles would play the pass Felix Jones would rip off a homerun hit TD then when they’d clamp down on the run it would be a Miles Austin double-move for a 60-yard TD. That’s the Garrett offense that I think works best. When you can make the opponent afraid of both phases of your game and then mix the play-calling to zig when they expect you to zag.

The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.

by Blue Eyed Devil on Jun 25, 2011 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

I'll be interested to see what happens

if they have fully competent line play. A lot of what we perceive as too much passing may be attributable to the fact that the line really isn’t cut out for straight-ahead, power run blocking. The decent ypc I credit more to the effectiveness of the passing game and a lot of misdirection.

Not saying I am certain Garrett doesn’t over-do it, just that for me I think not all the pieces have been in place.

Don't believe everything you think.

by dunkman on Jun 25, 2011 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

In 2009 it was

In 2009 the Dallas Cowboys were 2nd in the NFL in yards per attempt running with 5.15 yards per running attempt.

I don’t think you can say a whole lot about Garrett in 2010 because he was playing without his QB or a competent O-line. Clearly the offense we saw in much of 2010 was not the kind of offense he prefers to run. But I think the 2009 season is quite open for discussion when it comes to Garrett’s playcalling.

The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.

by Blue Eyed Devil on Jun 25, 2011 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

You may be right

We can also see what changes with JG as HC. The team clearly functioned very differently the last half of the season.

Don't believe everything you think.

by dunkman on Jun 25, 2011 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I always felt that OC then HC Garrett game planned around the OL.

The 3 step drops and misdirection plays seemed to be a plan to compensate for the lack of blockiing or maintaining blocks by an ageing OL.

Davie Wilson
"how bout them cowboys"!!!

by scotscowboyfan on Jun 25, 2011 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think the extension of the pass/run threat is our pass-catching RBs

It makes it so much easier to threaten a run by having Felix and Murray out there, but plan a pass knowing one of them could be open. Hell, even Miles doing some RB swings turns it the other way round as well.

by Specific on Jun 25, 2011 6:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

BED,

I put pretty much everything I think about this topic in this post

http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2010/9/29/1718035/wed-morning-qb-what-i-liked-didnt-like-and-a-leonard-davis-size

there’s also some discussion of the infamous GB game.

Finally, maybe Garrett didn’t run more in the GB game because Colombo went down after the first series Dallas only managed to gain 1.8 yards per carry after that.

If you think more ineffective runs at 1.8 yards per carry would have won that game, we’ll just have to agree to disagree.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jun 25, 2011 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

the ‘Garrett lost the GB game by abandoning the run’ meme must die

1. Dallas couldn’t run the ball effectively: 1.8 ypc after the Colombo injury in the first series
2. Dallas was passing the ball reasonably effectively: 4.9 yards per attempt. That’s not great but it’s not terrible. It’s right around average.
3. What lost the game was RW getting stripped by Woodson on a big gain and Woodson stepping in front of Witten on the goalline for a pick. 2 huge turnovers.

I don’t know why that game is such an obsession and how it crystallized into example #1 of how Garrett abandons the run.

Does anyone think shifting the mix from passes that were picking up 4.9 ypa to rushes that were picking up 1.8 ypa would have helped?

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jun 25, 2011 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

No

People who argue otherwise focus on the outcome of the game and assume the fact we didn’t run more caused the loss, instead of focusing on the reasons why we had to abandon the run, which caused us to pass more. The reasons for abandoning the run, plus the two turnovers, led to the loss itself.

I’d also argue, that because GB has generally been good at forcing turnovers, it’s likely that had we stuck with some balanced ratio of run and pass there might have been a fumble, probably from a running back being stood up and stripped, or from a shoulder pad tackle. This is just speculation on my part since we cannot go back in time redo how the game played out after Colombo’s injury.

"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."

by Rohpuri on Jun 25, 2011 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's pretty much the point

you’re a smart guy, you understand the phrase “sample size”

You have a season that tells you that your rush nets you 5.15 yards per attempt. Your opponent sells out and stops your runs early. What do you do? Maybe, Fan, you think the Packers are an unstoppable defense force that can’t possibly be stopped. Maybe you give up having any kind of balance in your playcalling because you’re so afraid of Green Bay.

Garrett chose that path and it netted him 7 points. I guess you agree with him. For Dallas it was impossible to score more than 7 points that day because Green Bay was so much better than the Cowboys could ever hope to be. That may be your opinion.

My opinion is that Garrett in this game was far to quick to abandon the run. A dominatnt run team in every game before and after this game was sacrificed just because the Packers stuffed it early… he didn’t commit tot he run, he fled from it at the earliest convenience. Garrett gave away the dual-threat offense that served us so well and instead turned the Cowboys into a 1-dimensional team unnecessarily. Once the opponent’s defensive coordinator realized that all Dallas was going to do was pass the ball, it became easy to dial up every exotic blitz in the playbook which stifled Dallas’ attack.

The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.

by Blue Eyed Devil on Jun 26, 2011 1:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Dallas’ attack wasn’t stifled. Dallas was able to move the ball through the air the entire game.

One could argue that the Witten pick was a result of all the passes. I would disagree.

I think these things happen. Every once in a while teams have 2 turnovers.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jun 26, 2011 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

That Felix Jones fumble

was also huge. If I remember correctly that was the first turnover of the game. Changed the whole momentum of the game. I thought it was a bad call, but whatever.

Thursday Jan 6, 2011--Doin' things the 'Cowboy Way'
Congrats and good luck Coach Garrett !

by DWare94_JRat90 on Jun 27, 2011 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Allow me to point out the 2007 season

DAL 25 BUF 24

Dallas pass attempts: 50, Dallas rush attempts: 22

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jun 25, 2011 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have read a lot of your'e posts on pass efficiency ,

and while i agree that this is a passing league(for successfull teams),there is a nagging doubt for me.
it is that while the score is the most important part of a game (most points wins) TOP is also a crucial part of the game.
my fear is that if you are heavily biased towards passing then you leave too much time for the opponent to score.
this is why i agree with BED’s post,we do need a balance of sorts ,to run down the clock when needed,or a stellar D ( which we don’t have) ,to force turnovers or 3 n outs.

Davie Wilson
"how bout them cowboys"!!!

by scotscowboyfan on Jun 25, 2011 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

To be fair

Dallas played from behind, and the reason they were in the hole so much to begin with was because of Romo’s first half interceptions.

That was such an awesome comeback to watch.

by Admiral Dallas on Jun 25, 2011 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

my point was that it’s poor analysis to draw conclusions from a single game.

the GB game no more proof of anything than the BUF game is.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jun 25, 2011 8:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Extremely spurious reasoning

I expect more from you Fan.

I have never said one game equates to a whole argument. The GB game is nothing more than an example, the most profound example in a line of reasoning. When people say that Dallas has an amazing unstoppable aerial attack that should be called at every convenience, the GB game is the best refutation of that statement. However, it’s not the only refutation of that statement. Which is why I provided more than one game of evidence.

Have you the time and I the patience I would be more then happy to review the entire 2009 campaign with you in detail and demonstrate how Dallas is much better with a balanced attack than a passing-only attack.

The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.

by Blue Eyed Devil on Jun 26, 2011 1:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Might I also mention

That the data for the entire year shows that yards-per-attempt are higher in packages that were more balanced than those that telegraphed passing-only plays.

That’s a whole season worth of data, not simply one game.

Your logic is completely without merit.

The Ohio State Buckeyes are your Sugar Bowl champions... and for the 7th year in a row Michigan still sucks.

by Blue Eyed Devil on Jun 26, 2011 1:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I could be wrong, so let’s examine the facts

here are Dallas’ drives for the GB game.

https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aq_pzudn-VEDdHg1THo4c0dNOGs2V1ZOanlkN25kalE&hl=en_US&authkey=CObLhN8M

A few points to note.

-prior to the 2 min drill to end the 1st half the run / pass balance was 45 / 55
-3 straight passes to end the 1st half pushed the balance up to 40/60
-the balance stayed right around 40/60 through the 3rd quarter.
-it wasn’t until Dallas was down 10 points in the 4th quarter and threw 16 straight passes as they were in catch up mode that the balance ballooned to 25/75. Those 16 straight passes moved Dallas down to GB goal line where Woodson stepped in front of Witten for a int.

here are the gains on the rushing plays after the first series (correction: they gained on average 2.7 ypc)

5, -1, 2, 2, 0, 3, -1, 11, 4, 2

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jun 26, 2011 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I could be wrong, but these seem contradictory.

I have never said one game equates to a whole argument.
the GB game is the best refutation of that statement.

by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jun 26, 2011 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

The rush attempts would've been higher

Had Dallas not also allowed 103 kickoff return TD by Terrence McGee to make the score 24-13. From that point forward Romo attempted 26 passes, and either ran it himself or handed the ball off a total of 8 times.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/boxscore?gid=20071008002&page=plays

"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."

by Rohpuri on Jun 25, 2011 8:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Statistics can refute, or support, any position one wants
An extremely interesting bit of research done by Bob Sturm has shown that when the Cowboys go out in the obvious 3WR 1RB 1 TE passing set, they actually perform worse per attempt than their heavy running 2RB, 2TE, and 1WR set AND their base 2WR, 2TE, 1RB set. Why is this?

I have read quite a bit of Bob’s research, and he does often make some very valid points. However—if it isn’t a but, it’s a however—there is a lot more to determining what the results would have been in the games where those statistics are cited than simply the run/pass ratio that Garrett called.

Rather than relying on pure statistics versus other objective, as well as subjective data, why don’t we simply say, “With Daryl Johnston leading Emmitt Smith through the ’92 Cowboys OL (Mark Tuinei, Nate Newton, Mark Stepnoski, John Gesek, and Erik Williams), the pass/run ratio would likely have been a lot closer in 2010.” And so would have the W-L differential.

Who knows? Maybe Garrett’s numbers might have looked an awfully lot more like those his mentor, Norv Turner.

by RenoCowboy on Jun 26, 2011 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm starting to drool at the thought

add in Felix who has developed into a very reliable and explosive pass catching back used extensively in screens and wheel type routes as an extension of the running game, Murray who excels at receiving including even lining up as a receiver, and Choice who is not a bad pass catcher himself, and even Chapas who is a decent receiver and should catch a few balls, and all that just further complements Garrett’s primary receivers and fills out his air attack arsenal.

Upgrade Colombo to Smith to give Tony the time, and this will be fun!

"When you want to win a game, you have to teach. When you lose a game, you have to learn."—Tom Landry

by scottmaui on Jun 25, 2011 1:07 PM CDT reply actions  

I mention something like this here:

Link

I mention that The Cowboys Offense could pass the 6000 yard threshold….Now I am not saying that they will, but:

Austin-1000+
Bryant- 1000+
Witten- 1000+
Felix/Murray- 2000+(combined)

Just saying is all….

With the 9th Pick Dallas Selects Tyron Smith...Romo Weeps in Joy, and Bennet says"I might get to go out in the Pass Pattern now!"

by I am Ironman!!! on Jun 25, 2011 3:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Seams all of our duckys are in a row for a bang up season

I agree 6000 is a possibility I doubt we will have 3 with a 1000. Tony will most definitely have a target rich environment. If he makes the right decisions those 6000 will be spread amongst many recipients.

by meisternance on Jun 25, 2011 10:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Get that dude a Steve Nash infusion.

I’m ridiculously excited. Rocking back and forth in my chair like a crack fiend. The thing is, it makes logical sense given our historical numbers. We have excelled at times at end-arounds and reverses, our standard passing attack has been one of tops in league; we should have a better protection scheme (if not from Arkin, Nagy and Smith, then our developing O-linemen,) and run blocking, add to that addition of Murray and + in execution due to coaching philosophy, there are too many angles for even the best defense to consistently execute coverages on.
It is a big stereotype to blame our o-line for holding calls that negate big plays, but it has been Witten and Austin (block in back,) also. When a player like Witten is losing his focus that is when you know the trickle-down effect has fully taken control of your team.
Our run blocking will improve, will actually be able to consistently use play-action to set up the deep ball. This is going to be ridiculous.

Give me UR calls! Give me highstepping by CBs and PRs entering the endzone! Give me screaming on the sidelines and headbutting! Give me Fortitude, Solidarity and VIOLENCE! Bring me CHAMPIONSHIPS!
Bring me Ridolin LOL! - B'nSB

by BlueNSilverBlood on Jun 26, 2011 1:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Air Garrett

Love this article. Great research. Begins the debate about air supremacy in the East. Hey Philly, Skins. and the overated G-men, make your case about air supremacy. We’re not talkin playoffs, we’re not talkin team rankings, we are talkin who has the best passing game today. Spoiler alert – the answer is Dallas.

by stubabe on Jun 25, 2011 4:12 PM CDT reply actions  

Air Garrett and Doomsday Ryan?

I’m all for Air Garrett. I’m looking forward to being able to score when we need to again.

I’m not interested in games ending 45 to 44. While our offense will be something to behold, I’m worried that no lead will be safe.

Here’s to hoping Ryan can bring back the D in Dallas. Garrett already brought the AA.

by calmyron on Jun 25, 2011 6:10 PM CDT reply actions  

an aerial attack will actually aid a doomsday defense

get up 21-0, then see The Dude dial up the exotic blitzes and kill the QB every down because we know they have to pass to get back in the game. Then we end the game 41-3 like the Rams did in 1999.

by mdlusk on Jun 26, 2011 1:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

"Shock & Awe" should be the name for this offense

Seriously, if the line lives up to it’s end of the bargain this year:
1) Romo can easily pass for 4,500 yards or more
a) 1000+ receiving yards each from Austin, Bryant, and Witten
b) 500-700 receiving yards from Roy Williams or ECU Rookie
c) Murray at least 500 receiving yards
d) Not to mention any cheap first down conversion yardage picked up by Bennett, Chopas, or Phillips
2) Factor in the new kickoff rules, our offense will shorter fields to work with than prior seasons, in theory, which could lead to more drives ending in TDs and less drives settling for field goals.
3) If the line and Romo can stay healthy I see no reason why this offense can’t challenge the 80’s Chargers, 1998 Vikings, 1999-2001 Rams, The 2000-2002 Raiders, The Colts of 2004, Patriots of 2007, and 2009 Saints as one of the most prolific offenses.

"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."

by Rohpuri on Jun 25, 2011 6:23 PM CDT reply actions  

ouch

"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."

by Rohpuri on Jun 25, 2011 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe I'm reding this offense completely wrong

But if Bryant ends up 1000+ (it’s a safe bet without injury that Miles will) I don’t see Witten getting 1000+

I could see him with another 85-90 catches and 750-850 yards. The ball is going to be spread around far too much for 3 players to get 1000+.

I also think Phillips coming back will eat into Witten’s numbers, which is fine with me. Keep Witten fresh don’t make him be the iron man he’s been for years. Prolong his career.

"Be great today" - Jason Garrett

by mhuff13 on Jun 25, 2011 11:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

If Romo and Dez stay healthy, I see Witten topping out at 65-70 receptions and far short of 1000 yards. But that’s OK! The Cowboys could have two #1 receivers for the first time since 2006, lessening the need to rely so much on #82.

by DavidH22 on Jun 26, 2011 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

On the other hand,

teams will have to pay so much attention to Dez, Austin and RW, Witten will be open more than ever. There’s not a LBer in the NFL that can cover Witten. If the O-line come together the Boys could be a force to contend with like no other in the league.

Lock n Load

by DIRE WOLF on Jun 26, 2011 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

also with Miles and Dez both taking away the safeties

Witten will have more room to turn and run down the field, so his ypc should increase….Now He may not get 1000 but if he can get his average ypc which is ~ 11 ypc then he should get ~750 yards

Miles- avg is 75 for 1180 over the past two years
Bryant(had he stayed healthy) was on pace for a 64 for 830 yards year
Witten has avg-(2004) 88 rec for 994 yards
Felix and Murray should get 570 “touches” for 2900 yards

so if Witten Miles and Dez all get ~75 catches while maintaining their avg ypc….
Miles-75/1200
Dez – 75/975
Witten – 75/900
Felix /Murray-570/3000
Total? 6000+…..

The key will be Felix and Murray….check the link for my reasoning for their totals….

With the 9th Pick Dallas Selects Tyron Smith...Romo Weeps in Joy, and Bennet says"I might get to go out in the Pass Pattern now!"

by I am Ironman!!! on Jun 26, 2011 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Under Garrett.

A three-back rotation has combined for 450 total touches per season. That ain’t changing and it certainly ain’t changing once you consider how much more Dez will be featured. I’m thinking; Felix 225-250 carries and Murray right around 100 carries with both guys catching right in the area of 50 passes; maybe more, maybe less.

I think if Garrett has any statistical mandates in mind that will make this offense into a juggernaut it’s certainly that Dez and Austin top well over 1,000 yards rather than two backs who produce 1,000 yards from scrimmage.

Besides all these yards are nice but if the offense actually improves in the most important area; having points to show for all these yards DARE I SAY IT that means the Cowboys will have blown some chumps out and it will be the scrubs stacking all these stats in the 4th.

by MadMick on Jun 26, 2011 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

true...I doubt that Dallas will actually get to that Plateau

For the reasons you gave……But it is nice to think that the Offense is capable of that….

With the 9th Pick Dallas Selects Tyron Smith...Romo Weeps in Joy, and Bennet says"I might get to go out in the Pass Pattern now!"

by I am Ironman!!! on Jun 26, 2011 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

You had me going until

I saw 3000 yards for the Murray-Jones tandem. You are aware, are you not, that in 1992, the year Dallas won the (’93) Super Bowl, 52-17; the year Emmitt Smith was first team All Pro with a total offense of 2048 yards, all the backs combined for 2614 yards? The next closest back to Emmitt was Moose with 310 combined yards.

Between the two, Emmitt and Moose, they had 390 rushes and 91 receptions. Emmitt and Moose were both work horses—go back and listen to Emmitt’s HOF acceptance speach. And now: an under achieving Jones—when compared to other RBs in his draft class—and a third round rookie, with an injury history, are going to blow away one of the best RB-FB combos in the history of the NFL?

And while we are at it, let’s look at the total receiving yards for Austin-Bryant-Witten: 3075. Do you have any idea what the comparable numbers for Irvin-Harper-Novacek—one was 1st team All Pro and another made the Pro Bowl—were in ‘92? I know, but I’ll let you go here to find out.

As Troy Aikman used to say, in his Logo Athletic (LA) commercials: Get Real.

by RenoCowboy on Jun 26, 2011 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually the 3,075 isn't that farfetched.

After all, those ‘90s teams were basically 50-50 pass/run teams; perfect balance. Case in point, all those championship teams had right around 500 rushes. All of Garrett’s Cowboys teams have ran the ball between 400-430 times.

But conversely that also makes it harder to see where all this fancy total yardage is coming from by the backs.

by MadMick on Jun 26, 2011 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

you would have read this:

Now if we assume that Dallas runs 60 offensive plays a game, and has a 55/45 pass/run balance, then Dallas should run the ball 27 times per game. Now if we assume that Dallas will split Felix and Murray carries equally, which gives them 13 carries apiece. Now using their “averages”, we can figure that the Murray and Felix combination will get a combined 101.4 yards per game rushing which will give them 1622 yards for the season(assuming 16 games). Not to shabby. Yet that is not taking into account the receptions they will get. Now if we add in 5 catches apiece(which gives them 18 “touches”), then they will have 1360 yards receiving for the year. Which means the between the two backs they will obtain 576 “touches” for 2982 yards from scrimmage

Now bear in mind that these numbers are very rough guesstimates….but that is where I came up with the 570/2900 numbers….I would suggest reading over that post…one of my better ones if I am allowed to “toot my own horn” so to speak…

as far as the WR numbers I admit that I did “fudge” a little to get some simpler numbers…..
However if you look at what Dallas did last year:
Miles- 69-1041
Bryant-(had he stayed healthy) was on pace for a 64 for 830 yards year
Witten – 91-1002
Which means that with Jon Kitna for half the Season, Dallas had, between these three, a total of (Assuming Bryant stayed Healthy) 234 rec for 2873…

So for my Projection I had 225 rec for 3075 yards and Last year Dallas managed 234 rec for 2873 yards….

So last year Dallas managed 12.2 yards per completion for Austin, Bryant and Witten..

I projected 13.6 yards per completion….1.4 yards per completion more….
Is it really that unfathomable?…..

With the 9th Pick Dallas Selects Tyron Smith...Romo Weeps in Joy, and Bennet says"I might get to go out in the Pass Pattern now!"

by I am Ironman!!! on Jun 26, 2011 9:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

In a best case scenario Romo is only completing 25 passes a game.

Also throw out Bryant’s pace for last year when Woy Willy still started 9 games. Dez is going to be a way bigger part of the offense this year.

Austin; his production took a major nosedive when Romo went down. With Romo last season he was on pace for over 100 receptions and 1,400 yards.

Then once you factor in Witten that’s 16-18 of Romo’s completion pie to those three guys; not factoring in Martard Bennett or Phillips or whoever the 3rd wide receiver ends up being.

Plus think about it for a second; 5 receptions a game is 80 for the season. By TWO different running backs? With all those other weapons to throw to? Ludicrous. Won’t happen.

Felix/Murray will get six bones a game COMBINED in the passing game. Also I’d have to imagine Felix won’t split carries right down the middle with Murray but rather that Murray will get anywhere from 5-10 carries depending on the tempo of the game.

by MadMick on Jun 26, 2011 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dizzying array of weapons...

I’ve read many articles and I don´t remember anyone mentioning the possibility of JG using Demarco in the slot until now (as he was used at times at OU) and felix as the back… Imagine defenses trying to cover Felix, Murray, Jason, Dez and Miles not to mention that Tony can tuck the ball and run also! Having RB´s that are dangerous in dumpoffs keeps defenses honest as LB´s will have to keep an eye on the RB thus lesser players to Blitz…

by Mazmar on Jun 25, 2011 6:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Should we call Jason Garret "Admiral Dallas"?

"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."

by Rohpuri on Jun 25, 2011 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tony must stay healthy

That’s the key. If the OL can block effectively enough to keep Romo from getting killed, he’ll find a receiver. Our receiving core is as good as any in the league. If Rivers can find some 17 different guys due to injury so can Tony. I don’t see the Cowboys having those injury problems, so the key is enough pass protection to keep Tony safe. Felix will be a M Faulk type of back, as will Murray. We’ll have plenty of fire power, all we have to do is keep the canon loaded and Tony will approach 5000 yds.

by pfloyd1 on Jun 25, 2011 8:12 PM CDT reply actions  

I'd also like to see them work on scoring more in the first quarter.

Too often we’ve failed to get an early lead, which places enormous stress on the D as the game progresses.

by pfloyd1 on Jun 25, 2011 8:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Our D and the OL have been the biggest problems,

we can’t get an early lead plus we can’t hold onto one.
let’s hope the new DC plus the better? OL help this .

Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.
Winston Churchill
Go Cowboys!!

by scotscowboyfan on Jun 25, 2011 8:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

special teams coverage units as well

The only saving grace on defense and special teams for us the past 4 seasons:
1) Ware
2) Ratliff
3) McBriar
4) Buehler since 2009

Think how much worse things would be.

"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."

by Rohpuri on Jun 25, 2011 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, its a little early; but no it wouldn’t hurt to go ahead and trademark that phrase.

by G_SWAG on Jun 26, 2011 4:51 AM CDT reply actions  

Garrett seems to have a blase attitude toward balance in general.

It’s almost as if Garrett approaches Romo like he’s a great NBA shooter like Kobe or Dirk who even when they’re struggling it’s in their own team’s best interest for them to “keep shooting until they shoot their way out of the slump.”

Of course, we all know how different the two games are. If your QB; or passing offense as a whole for whatever reason (cruddy blocking, best threat being neutralized, stray-armed triggerman) is having a crappy day there are far worse consequences than just a missed shot in basketball. Whereas in basketball even a missed shot presents a 50/50 shot that your own team rebounds it and gets a second opportunity even the BEST case scenario in football is much more dire; an incompleted pass, a wasted down.

Garrett’s not going to change but on those rare occasions when Romo has his off days (REALLY OFF days) it would behoove Garrett to remember balance can be Romo’s best friend. Just remember how shockingly close the Cowboys got to winning Romo’s most embarrassing individual performance as a pro; the Grand Opening at Jerry World, because the Cowboys runners couldn’t be stopped.

Now since it should be fully expected the short passing game will be used even more as an extension of the running game going, Felix and Murray’s effectiveness in that area will need to be factored in when gauging how Garrett gets his backs involved early in games.

I definitely think we’re getting way ahead of ourselves with all the Greatest Show Part Deux talk. Everybody should be thinking a little more modestly like getting back to ‘07 PPG levels. I mean no matter how good you think Tyron is going to be; there’s still going to be a learning curve for a rookie starting tackle.

by MadMick on Jun 26, 2011 4:53 AM CDT reply actions  

is it just me...

Or doesn anyone else see alot of Walsh influences in this Offense?

Coryell- Deep threats, combined with a power running game

Walsh- Short to intermediate passing combined with short passing to the RB’s in leiu of a “dedicated running game”

Jason Garrett Offense- Intermediate/Deep passing combined with short passing game to RB’s in leiu of a “dedicated running game”

Am I crazy?

With the 9th Pick Dallas Selects Tyron Smith...Romo Weeps in Joy, and Bennet says"I might get to go out in the Pass Pattern now!"

by I am Ironman!!! on Jun 26, 2011 11:43 AM CDT reply actions  

No Iron Man, you're dead on

Walsh would have loved Miles and Dez.

by pfloyd1 on Jun 26, 2011 2:03 PM CDT reply actions  

This offense is Air Coryell meets Bill Walsh's West Coast.

"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."

by Rohpuri on Jun 26, 2011 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

oh good

so I am not going crazy? whew, load of my mind!

With the 9th Pick Dallas Selects Tyron Smith...Romo Weeps in Joy, and Bennet says"I might get to go out in the Pass Pattern now!"

by I am Ironman!!! on Jun 26, 2011 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

It was

that’s the point of the WCO. Shorter, high percentage passing. It’s partly why Steve Young had off-the-charts accuracy rating compared with his contemporaneous.

Garrett won’t run a WCO, but if the defense dictates (or the line can’t protect or run block), I think he’d like the option of having guys catching balls out of the backfield.

Don't believe everything you think.

by dunkman on Jun 26, 2011 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

*contemporaries*

Too hasty picking my spell check option!

Don't believe everything you think.

by dunkman on Jun 26, 2011 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bill Walsh

might have loved Miles and Dez, but I see those guys more fitting into the Coryell mold. Besides, Walsh had plenty of great receivers as it was.

by RenoCowboy on Jun 26, 2011 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Bedtime Stories Part 1: What KMAAN
222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
2012: Random Thoughts about Anything but a Quiet Offseason
Demarco_murray_st_louis_rams_v_dallas_cowboys_baxpocve6rkl_small
Headed in the Right Direction...(Delusional or Reality)
Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...
Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants

Recent FanPosts

Small
Beat the Pass Rush
Small
Romo and the Super Bowl Question
Small
A LETTER TO MIKE JENKINS...
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys Athletic D-Linemen
Small
How much does pass rush matter?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn