Best/worst trades Best free agents signed/lost

You are right. Glover seemed to play his heart out for this team.

it cant be argued that any other trade dallas has made has been as good as Walker. Worst Galloway over Williams because it was 2 1st rders and Seattle ended up taking was Alexander and Hutchinson (not saying thats who Dallas would of taken but you get my point). Worst lost agreed Jimmy Smith, probably wouldnt of made the Galloway deal if they kept him. Cant give GM credit for 2 moves that were made for monetary reasons and not football reasons and btw Allen did make another Pro Bowl and Emmitt was still better than Hambrick.

Thanks for the info Ham. This is my favorite blog and I read it regularly. I’m sorry I don’t read everything on this blog. I have been thinking about this post for a while. i just thought it might have some entertainment value.

FA- I was suggesting we review/discuss FA pro players cut by other teams.

Of course, Romo and Austin were the best non-drafted FA signed.

I am talking about FA like Keith Brooking (pro players who have been cut and don’t require a trade to sign them).

Who would have thought that with out John Phillips and Ken Hamlin, we could have played so badly in 2010.

I followed your advise on my unacceptable fanpost and again reviewed guidelines. It said, FP should be at least 100 words. I just counted my words and there are 101 (unless you don’t count GM or jr as words). Personally, I have seen many posts where a blogger takes way too many words to express an opinion. By my count, my post was 8 lines not 5. I also said I read this blog regularly not daily. I can understand why newbies might be hesitant to post anything here. I have seen previous posts on trades and FA signings before. What is it about the material that is unacceptable? I hope you can instruct me on proper material, so if I ever post again, I can be sure it exceeds the guidelines and has your approval.
Re: John Phillips
It seemed to me we had a very productive offense in ’09 and it was much less productive in ’10. The offensive personal was basicly the same except for the absense of John Phillips. I am not saying there was a cause and effect because of his absense, it was just a coincidence. On defense, many wanted to see K Hamlin replaced. He was and our defense was much worse. Again cause and effect or just coincidence or neither? I believe other bloggers have posted and/or commented on the drop off of offense and defense play from ’09 to ’10. My comment was intended to be more of an ironic musing than statement of fact.
What did make us go 1-7? If you have the answer, I would like to know.
Also, please feel free to correct my spelling and grammer errors when you find them.

Thanks for your response.
As with most newbie bloggers/posters, I welcome your instructions.
I am not computer literate, can’t type well, can’t do links, post charts, post pics or graphs.
I guess you agree my post included the required amount of words.
You didn’t respond to my questions: 5 or 8 lines?, if Marty B wasn’t the reason we went 1-7, what was he reason?
Re: How a topic generates discussion. I would think on this blog that the amount of discussion generated on a topic would be a good thing.
I agree a one line post saying Romo sucks can generate discussion. I think there have been many posts on this.
My post was not one line and it invited multiple answers.
Re: Well thought out post. Was the trade for C Haley more beneficial than the signing of D Sanders? Was Larry Brown or Alvin Harper the worst free agent signing by another team? I don’t know how you can presume to know my thought process. In spite of what you may think, I do think quite a long time before I consider posting (because of blog police).
Re: Original opinions? If it’s not origional , I can’t blog on it? What about blogging on the poor play of the OL. poor play of Safety, poor play by DBs, M Jenkins, coaches, Rat, D Ware, draft picks and free agent available/needed. I don’t think these are original thoughts. You say I/nobody can post or blog an opinion on them because it is not “original”. I guess a lot of other bloggers are in your ‘dog house.’
Please, just make it clear what your rules are and what I can and can not blog on your site. i hope your rules will apply equally to all.