Could The Lockout Mean Better Football Once The Season Starts?
Pete Prisco from CBSSports.com published an article today speculating that the quality of football won't be any different at all when it's back, and could potentially be of an even better quality come fall. Here's why:
"We're mentally rested," said one player. "We haven't had to be at the facility all the time. We've taken trips. We've gotten away from it. It's good to get away from it. It gives you separation from the next year. It will feel more like a new season. The mental side is a big part of football. Getting away from it for everyone is a good thing. Guys will be refreshed. Coaches will be refreshed."
This is a sentiment that has been echoed by a number of veteran players around the league, including a couple of Cowboys.
Patriots wide receiver Wes Welker made national headlines in late April when he talked about how much he was enjoying the freedom the current NFL lockout has afforded him and how he’s in no hurry to see the lockout come to an end.
"Let’s do a lockout every year," Welker said in an interview with the Associated Press recently.
And Welker isn't alone in thinking that the lockout has its upsides. However, the reaction in the media was a lot less friendly when Reggie Bush tweeted that he was also enjoying the lockout. Many other veterans subsequently chimed in with similar points of view.
Cowboys linebacker Keith Brooking found the unusual time off has been refreshing and that he's been enjoying it. Brooking is happy that the lockout has given his body a little bit more time to regenerate, particularly as he's likely reached the final year of his career (listen to Brooking's full interview with Atlanta's 709 The Zone here).
"I feel like my body is definitely starting to come around now. ... Me, personally, the lockout's probably been a good thing for me to give it a little bit more time. But I'm working out extremely hard now. ... I don't foresee me playing another year after this year. This is definitely going to be my last year. It's been a great run, and I hated to go out the way we did with the season last year, so I'm definitely looking forward to turning this thing around this year and getting this thing headed on the right track."
The common theme among veteran players is that the extra time off has given their bodies time to rest, heal and regenerate properly after the rigors of a full NFL season. Cowboys receiver Roy Williams spoke to his hometown paper the Odessa American about the topic recently (Via ESPN's Tim McMahon):
"I talked to a player who was contemplating retirement, but the lockout has gotten his body back to where it needs to be. For us older players, it’s good."
Conspicuously absent among the voices endorsing the lockout: rookies and free agents. They will be missing a vital part of the preseason in which teams install their playbooks at a more leisurely pace than than they will have to do this year.
For the Cowboys, this could mean one of several things. Don't expect to see a lot of early action from any of the rookies, up to and including Tyron Smith. There was talk leading up to the draft that Smith may have the highest potential of any lineman, but that he was not the most NFL-ready lineman available. Could this mean the Cowboys keep Marc Colombo around as insurance for another year?
Also, to ease the transition, the Cowboys could be looking to add free agents who have played in or are familiar with the schemes the Cowboys will run on offense and defense. On defense this, could make Abram Elam from Cleveland, Michael Huff from Oakland and perhaps even Brodney Pool from the Jets more attractive to the Cowboys. On offense, it's anybody's guess.
Blame it on the weak 2009 draft class, or on this year's potential-heavy draft class, but overall, the Cowboys are likely to field a team in which most starters will have at least three NFL seasons of experience, in many cases a lot more. Could the extra rest be a benefit for these Cowboys players, and could we see a rested and revitalized Cowboys team once the season starts?
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The first few weeks are going to be sloppy as hell. You don’t get better at something by not doing it. Prisco is a dope. I can see why the vets aren’t missing camp. I’ve seen camp. Camp is brutal. But rested minds? Please.
That said, I do believe the veteran-heavy lineups are probably in a better position to be less rusty than younger ones.
http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/ - Eagles
http://bloggingthebeast.com/ - NFC East
Agreed.
I expect highs in fumbles, picks, and parity.
Parity meaning no team will run away with anything.
add to that "Missed Tackles"
ugh
check out my bands nanoSMASH and Day vs Night
by AustonianAggie on Jul 14, 2011 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions
We're already terrible at that. haha
I remember Dominek Hixon and Jacobs just blowing by our special teams. ugh.
NFC West might win the division at 6-10 ! lol.
Can you say Yin and Yang?
While our veterans will be better rested, it will also mean some of them are starting only because the young guys didn’t have time to prepare. Not sure I like that trade off.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and Stephen Bowen can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
yep
rest for vets = lack of progress of the youth
on top of the fact that we will have a new def sceme (sp) to deal with.
Expect the first half of the year to be alot of ugly football, but the back side may be better, maybe the vets will have more in the tank than they have had in prev years……tough to tell at this point
He who laughs last, thinks slowest
Well.....my days of not taking you seriously have certainly come to a middle
"Pleased to meet you, hope you guess my name"
NOT AT ALL
Teams that were competitive last year are going to be competitive again this year due to their familiarity with existing veteran players, coaching staff, and schemes while teams that are in a rebuilding mode will most definitely suffer. One of the most exciting things about the NFL is the fact that year after year any team can break through and make a SB run, think the Pittsburgh Pirates, Golden State Warriors, or Florida Panthers will get a sniff at a title run over the next 10, 15, even 20 years? Parody (as much as it may have hurt the 90s dynasty) is a huge reason why the NFL is the most popular sport in the States and growing globally. Instead of the normal 50% playoff turnover it’s very likely that this year may only see 1 or 2 new teams making it which will make for a very less interesting NFL season. The NFL and NFLPA need to pull their head outta their asses and make this happen.
In Reality - Cowboys are a complete mess
The lockout has ruined JG’s steady plan to re-invent the franchise.
Instead of ratcheting up his team philosophy and molding the group (coaches included) he will be left juggling the parts that Stephen and Jerrah can deliver on time for a season that has no room for slow starts….
The fact that Garrett doesn’t know if Doug Free will help anchor the line or who will secure the secondary is frightening.
Dez isn’t cleared for football yet. I’ve seen vey little on John Phillips progress. Bruce Carter is at 85% whatever that means.
Jason Garrett (and to perhaps a greater extent Rob Ryan) has so much on his plate and so little time to piece it all together. Just terrible timing for a franchise that was turning things around.
I'm worried -
One – Dez Bryant had no camp last year and is doing nothing football related right now. Plus he basically missed his last college season.
Two – Who is the team’s LT? Doug Free Agent?
Three – Who is the team’s RT? A raw rookie who eight teams passed on?
Four – Is Romo ready to lead again? Apparrently Kitna got some strange high praise for leadership that puzzled me.
Five – Can Anthony Spencer play? I was told he could.
Six – Mike Jenkins? Mirage last year or the year before?
Seven – Buehler? Does the new kickoff rule make his ability as a “Big Boot” insignificant?
Eight – Alan Ball.
Nine – Leonard Davis. What if his production slides again?!?
Ten – DeMarco Murray. Will he get enough touches to contribute or will Felix Jones wear down by playing too much this season? I wonder.
Eleven – Defensive Line. Wouldn’t it be nice to hear someone’s name besides Jay Ratliff involved in a tackle for a loss or a big sack?
Twelve – Roy Williams. If he can not be a solid number two (not number three) starter he has no purpose on this team.
Thirteen – Martellus Bennett. Can he actually make one of his athletic freak plays on a Sunday afternoon…preferably in Cowboys Stadium, in uniform, against a team in different uniforms?
Fourteen – Miles Austin. Will he lead the league in dropsies again?
Fifteen – The 2009 draft class…oh wait, we didn’t have a class that season.
Sixteen – Sean Lee/Bruce Carter – Will at least one of them be healthy enough to play every week and give The Old Man of the Brook a breather?
There is a ton of concern when I look to this season…and the division is going to be tough.
Is Romo ready to lead again???
Thats the dumbest comment I’ve seen on this blog for quite a while
In Romo we Trust
Really?
I thought it was a non-issue too…however Bennett openly challenged him and then Brooking is going out of his way to praise him for practice organization (something every starting QB should do.)
Never heard anyone question Troy Aikman. That’s all.
I took it Romo was the man on the offense…and I sure as heck don’t want to see him waving his arms in frustration during a crucial drive in the playoffs like he did at home against the Giants three years ago….that was a concern at the time.
To be fair, in Troy's time
The media coverage was a fraction of what it is today. Today, even God can’t keep up with the media on reports of sparrows falling.
Guys questions each other and it gets immediate coverage. Think Rapistberger and Harrison. That doesn’t validate Bennett (or Harrison) it calls into question the judgment of those two players.
Romo (and many other players) is now under a coach who will give him the environment to take charge and what we’re seeing is the result of that process – veterans taking charge.
Don't believe everything you think.
Actually, in Troy's time...
Jimmy Johnson gave up a first round pick to pick up Steve Walsh in the supplemental draft. That is probably the biggest questioning of leadership a coach can make. Oh yeah, today we call it brilliant strategy by the master of mind games, but I am pretty sure Troy Aikman didn’t see it that way. Also, 1 game after Walsh was traded to New Orleans for a 1st, 2nd & 3rd, Troy put up a stinker of a game and once again, Jimmy “the motivator” Johnson told reporters that he traded the wrong quarterback and that “Aikman was a loser in college and he’ll always be a loser in the pros.”
Sometimes our memories gloss over those things.
Think Jimmy the Shrink used that to motivate Troy
He loved Aikman…wished he had him in Miami.
by TruBluToTheCore on Jul 15, 2011 7:22 AM CDT up reply actions
Not likely
I happened to have been at the 1989 training camp every single day, including 2-a-days. Troy wanted out. Walsh was Jimmy’s boy. I am sure it didn’t get any better as the season went on and he bombed and was getting blasted by D linemen and his coach.
dude, Bennett is a freakin moron
why would you take anything seriously that clown says??
and what does waving his arms in a game have to do with leadership?? I’ve seen Manning behave much worse when he’s losing.
In Romo we Trust
Ummmkk
I will have to politely disagree with 85% of what you think Rome. I think JG’s plan and philosphy are still intact and have only been bolstered by vets taking on more responsibility due to the player run practices. Not only that but this draft class if filled with “The right kinda guys” that will be highly motivated as soon as they reach the field.
As far as Free, I think this is definately on JG’s mind but im sure he already has 8 contengency plans in place as a back up. Dez was supposedly “flying” around when they had the team workouts, but he hasnt been cleared becuase he hasnt seen the team doctors. As far as John Phillips, if he’s back that just pushes MB and gives up another option at TE.
Then there’s Bruce Carter. First what do you really expect from a rookie? Lets be honest. He wasnt brought in to be a game changer from day 1. Like Ive said before, he just needs to get to the facility and get with our trainers. They will be able to evaluate him and set him up with a training regimen to get him back, probably stronger then ever.
I do feel for RR though. Luckily he did get some of his ideas and playbooks out early on in all this mess, but he still needs time with the guys. This just leads me to believe we will end up bringing in one of his guys to help our secondary.
by AmericasTeamm on Jul 14, 2011 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Some will Benefit
Teams like our Cowboys Who took it among themselves to get ready for the 2011 (in what ever form that may be) wont look sloppy at all. I believe we will have up to a three Game jump on the rest of the NFL slackers. Of course our rookies are going to suffer- When I think of the lost weight room time – man what a waste! Keeping Marc “The Junkyard Dog” Colombo who has profited from extra body heal time is a pretty good idea. He will play a major role I fell In Tyrons development. Bring in Elam (man do we need S help!) who can help bring our Ryan defense up to speed in short order. Our grit, our desire to succeed , has already put us ahead.
I'm calling BS on this one
BS BS BS
I’m a musician enough to know that “if I go one week without practice, I notice. If I go two weeks without practice, my critics notice. If I go three weeks without practice, my fans notice.”
If it was better to practice less, we’d of been practicing less 100s of years ago
so its BS BS BS
check out my bands nanoSMASH and Day vs Night
It doesn't make sense to me that players feel they are more refreshed
because the vast majority of them are still working out on their own and many teams like the Cowboys were having their own OTAs this summer.
I would think physically their bodies should be in no better or worse shape than any other season.
In Romo we Trust
I believe the players ARE refreshed..
I think many of yall forget what it’s like to be burnt out on something… It’s good for some to find that passion and desire to do their jobs; just because it’s football doesn’t mean its without the mental drain, no matter what Billy Bob in his duct taped La-Z Boy at the other end of the TV thinks.
FEAR the STAR.
by .FRoST.USAF on Jul 14, 2011 2:59 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Rest vs Rust
I don’t know, man, but all this time off doesn’t bode well to me.The offense may be impacted less so than the defense because of the familiarity of the O schemes. The defense has a completely new version of the 3-4 to implement. The O will have to deal with timing issues. I’m sure the players are in good shape, but are they in contact football shape? Overall I’d have to give the edge to rust and hope that, since every team is essentially in the same boat, we can avoid early injuries, progress rapidly and continue to improve especially on defense as the season progresses.
Physically they are about where they would be aside from weight room strength.
OTA’s are limited in the amount of contact that can occur. Thats why you keep hearing about teams that get fined or lose practices due to the amount of contact.
by TruBluToTheCore on Jul 15, 2011 7:27 AM CDT up reply actions
Overall, I don't see the lockout improving quality.
It may help some individuals, and there may be some merit in giving the players more downtime in the offseason, but overall, expect rust, bad play, and there will certainly be a couple of out of shape people around the league.
As someone might once have written in a fanpost, the Cowboys are one of the teams that will likely feel the most negative impact from the lockout. The only good thing to come out of the lockout is . . . uh . . . a little help?
If at first you don't succeed - blame someone else.

by 





























