Operation O-Line: Rebuilding On The Fly, Dallas Cowboys Style
It's still too early to say who the starters on the Cowboys offensive line will be this year. But it's fairly certain that the line will look significantly different from last year's line. As it should. But when does too much of a good thing - in this case: change on the offensive line - become a bad thing?
Two years ago, the Patriots' Matt Light remarked on the benefits of continuity along the offensive line:
"The obvious part is the familiarity," Light said. "It's not impossible, but it's a heck of a learning curve trying to get used to playing next to another guy and all the mistakes that come with that. When you've been able to keep a group together, you are able to get through camp so much easier. You're able to install things quicker."
But continuity was not the answer for the Cowboys, whose running game was ranked 15th in yards per carry last year, the lowest rank since 2005, when the Cowboys finished the season ranked 25th in YPC. And that year, 2005, carries a special significance for the this year's O-line predicament: a year later, in 2006, the Cowboys had jumped to 14th in the league -- with a completely reworked O-line that returned only one starter from the year before. After the break, we look at how the line changed from 2005 to 2006 and compare it to what's happening this year.
Here's how the starters changed from '05 to '06. The age shown is the player's age at the end of that calendar year.
| 2005 | 2006 | ||||
| Player | Games started | Age | Player | Games started | Age |
| LT Torrin Tucker | 10 | 26 | LT Flozell Adams | 16 | 31 |
| LG Larry Allen | 16 | 34 | G Kyle Kosier | 16 | 28 |
| C Al Johnson | 16 | 26 | C Andre Gurode | 16 | 28 |
| RG Marco Rivera | 14 | 33 | G Marco Rivera |
16 | 34 |
| RT Rob Petitti | 16 | 23 | RT Marc Colombo | 16 | 28 |
Flozell Adams would of course have been the starter in 2005 if he hadn’t been injured after six games. And Gurode had started at right guard in 2004. But even if you take those two players into account, 2006 still saw a significant revamping of the O-line in one year. Can the Cowboys pull it off again this year? The table below shows what the O-line could look like this year compared to last year.
| 2010 | 2011 | ||||
| Player | Games started | Age | Player | Games started | Age |
| LT Doug Free |
16 | 26 | LT Doug Free |
- - | 27 |
| LG Kyle Kosier |
13 | 32 | LG Arkin/Costa | - - | 24/24 |
| C Andre Gurode |
16 | 32 | C Andre Gurode | - - | 33 |
| RG Leonard Davis |
16 | 32 | G Kyle Kosier | - - | 33 |
| RT Marc Colombo | 15 | 32 | RT Tyron Smith |
- - | 21 |
Note that I've penciled in either Arkin or Costa at left guard in place of Montrae Holland. But regardless of who will actually start at left guard, the Cowboys line in 2011 will feature new or different players at three out of five positions. In some ways, this is comparable to the 05/06 switch in terms of numbers. But there are a couple of critical differences.
Depending on who the coaches ultimately choose to start, there could be two rookies starting on the line. All '06 linemen were veterans. Additionally, the '06 line had a full offseason to get acclimated to each other. This year's O-line has only been together for a little over two weeks.
At first glance, it therefore appears odd that seemingly every practice features a new O-line, with one or more players playing in a different position than they did the practice before. Wouldn't you rather have each player focus on one position to get to at least a base level of proficiency at that position?
Not according to O-line coach Hudson Houck, who thinks the crash course in positional versatility which especially the younger guys are getting is going to be beneficial down the road:
"If you're going to play the five best guys you got to move them around a little bit so they can get comfortable at other positions," offensive line coach Hudson Houck said. "You need the options. These young guys coming in have to be able to play not only at right tackle, but left tackle, and the guards, of course, having to play either side. The center has to play guard. When you go into a game you're going in with seven offensive linemen."
Nobody expects this O-line to turn into a top 10 unit right away. In fact, it's quite unrealistic not to expect growing pains and early struggles for this O-line. But the consensus seems to be that the line will very likely improve as the season progresses.
The Cowboys are rebuilding their line on the fly. And if history is any indication, good things lie ahead for the Cowboys. Here's how many sacks the Cowboys allowed after rebuilding their line heading into the 2006 season:
| Cowboys O-line | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| Sacks allowed | 50 | 37 | 25 |
Of course, having a mobile Tony Romo replace a somewhat less mobile Drew Bledsoe midway through the 2006 season helped with those sack numbers, but there is no doubt that the line play also improved significantly.
The Cowboys may be rebuilding on the fly, and they will not have the benefit of continuity on their O-line. But the Cowboys have shown before that they can pull off such a change. And if early reports from camp are anything to go by, there is reason believe that the team should see significant returns from that rebuilding process already this season.
Nevertheless, don't be surprised if the Cowboys add some last-minute veteran help via free agency or the waiver wire. After all, one of the key pieces to the rebuilt 2006 O-line was Kyle Kosier, whom the Cowboys signed in March of 2006 to a relatively modest 5-year deal. That is also the Cowboys style of rebuilding.
80 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
surely needed...
i’m glad we’ve decided to rebuild on the fly. and i’m impressed with garrett’s vision. although i’mma little concerned when i see the size of the giants d-line and see the size of our o-line i wonder if bigger d-lines won’t just overpower us. in space, i get the feeling our new improved line will be able to get to the second level efficiently. I just wonder if they won’t get blown off the ball more often than not.
great look at the o-line. really thought provoking article.
"They need security in the world, Craig!"
I too am quite worried about 3 and inches
I get how an agile and athletic line can break big runs just not sure how that plays out on the goal line.
Everyday I feel a little better about the way this team is being run.
by Feeling Blue & Silver on Aug 16, 2011 6:52 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Ogle-screen to Bubbletree?
Smiles ahead
by accidental innuendo on Aug 16, 2011 6:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Not so worried about size differences if they can play
The future model of NFL offensive linemen is faster, stronger and more athletic rather than just big. Welcome, Tyron.
The important point is that the offensive scheme takes advantage of the mobility of the offensive players and negates the size of the opposing d line by wearing them down.
Like OCC says, there will undoubtedly be growing pains, but this year, I expect an O Line that does not fade come December.
Smiles ahead
by accidental innuendo on Aug 16, 2011 6:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Actually that is backwards
As long as they are fit, it is more likely for a quicker smaller line to get worn out by the biggers stronger line. That is what our O line did to smaller D lines in the 90’s.
by burmafrd1944 on Aug 16, 2011 7:21 AM CDT up reply actions
Hitting those big D lines with screens will help our OL. I think that’s why JG loves them so much
by Mac_Eleven on Aug 16, 2011 9:46 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Or they will be slowed down and playing very cautious, the DL that is
When this new agile OL quickly gets in front for a felix screen or changes directions and goes for a witten middle screen. Romo can run really fast backwards! Oh the things JG can come up with when he won’t have both hands tied behind his back by an aging OL.
Tony Romo 2011's League's Most Valuable Player
Yeah good Job Keg
Really enjoyed the read and the insight. The growing pains are inevitable, but the reward, hopefully, will be more than worth it. Love the new agile look to the o-line!
by Bermystar on Aug 16, 2011 6:54 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Who is this Keg you speak so fondly of? :-)
by One.Cool.Customer on Aug 16, 2011 7:29 AM CDT up reply actions
Sincerest Apologies OCC
I’m sneakin in all my BTB info via cell phone while @ work. Was readin this and Keg’s unrelated post on Defense and called the wrong name. Kudos on an excellent article tho
by Bermystar on Aug 16, 2011 8:48 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
No need to apologize, it was just a joke. But to be honest, at the pace we’re pumping out our articles these days even I get confused about who wrote what.
Sometimes, as I’m sorting through the archives, I find a really interesting article, only to find that I wrote it myself. This post for example is recycled from another post that I had completely forgotten about called Fixing The Cowboys O-Line In Three Easy Steps.
by One.Cool.Customer on Aug 16, 2011 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions
Crazy how accurate that post from December turned out to be OCC...
…aside from the FA Guard you wanted which is turning out to be another rookie. If you had mentioned Tyron by name I was gonna faint.
by American Fan on Aug 16, 2011 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Actually, I did mention Smith
along with a few other guys, but my assessment of where they were going to be picked was waaaay off.
Between Tyron Smith, Lee Ziemba, Marcus Cannon, DeMarcus Love and perhaps even a Nate Solder, there should be top quality tackles available at the top of the second round.
by One.Cool.Customer on Aug 16, 2011 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Ha! It happened to you!
::marks calendar::
SB Nation's Dallas Cowboys Site, Blogging The Boys | Follow me @KDP10for10
Flood The Block Radio on THEFLOW, every Tuesday 730p on www.rocktheflow.com | The new social pulse of the DMV.
I said after last season we needed to replace Davis and Colombo
and we have done just that. I would have preferred a veteran guard over Costa or Arkin, however, either one will be a big upgrade over Davis, just as much as Smith will be an upgrade over Colombo.
Bottom line, our OL will be much better this season and as a result, so will our entire offense.
In Romo we Trust
hey you gotta get young somehow right?
Ill take some growing pains if it means they will be playing for the next 8 years on young legs
Tony Romo 2011's League's Most Valuable Player
Don't give yourself too much praise Terry.
Anyone with a working set of eyes could tell that they were finished after 2010.
I remember arguing repeatedly with you about Colombo after 09 when I was begging for an upgrade and you couldn’t wait to get him back. Davis’ replacement should have already been in the pipeline then too. Remember when I flipped out that the coaches took the outstanding 09 RT Doug Free out of the lineup to rush Marc "cripple" Colombo back for the playoffs. I said the move was horrible, you championed that move all the way.
The way to counter big d lines is....
counters, traps and screens. However at some point you will have to man up and move your guy backwards. That is why I am in favor of keeping Gurode at center for this year. Davis was so bad last season I think Gurode was caught up in trying to compensate for his poor play. An athletic guard can iniate contact quicker so his man isn’t allowed an unencumbered path to the backfield. This is what killed Dallas in the Titan game.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
Davis was god awful in the Detroit game too.
Suh pushed him around like a rag doll and not mention he whiffed on a number of blocks too.
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
Antonio,
I think you’re going to see that from a lot of O-Linemen vs. Suh. The guy’s a manimal!
by CapnComeback on Aug 16, 2011 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions
True I'll give you that
But the whiffing on blocks is just embarrassing.
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
I'm happy for the revamp, since I've been begging for one for years. What
I hope is that the coaches are teaching these guys great technique to compensate for the lighter, faster style of O lineman the Cowboys are moving to. Stepnoski was comparatively small, but his technique made him a great lineman.
I'd expect more changes on the horizon soon
O-line circa 2012-2013
Free
Arkin
Costa
Nagy
Smith
Strange, but Free would be the greybeard of this group, at 29/30
How long will Free be the LT
As long as Smith stays healthy, I can see us trading Free in 2 – 3 years and moving Smith to LT. IMO this was Free’s last contract in Dallas.
"Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but what you should have accomplished with your ability."
-John Wooden
it all about the $$
It may be hard to resign Free, an above average LT, for RT money. I would imagine he will demand LT $$ since it will potentially be his last contract. He potentially could play out the end of his deal and leave. Thus, we could get virtually nothing. Or, we could franchise him, but would still have to pay him LT money.
If we continue to develop young o-lineman we could have a lower cost RT and get a good draft pick or player for Free. This is a similar methodology that Phily, NE & GB follow.
Of course this is all dependent on Smith becoming a good player, solid drafts at all positions, development of young o-lineman, etc, …
"Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but what you should have accomplished with your ability."
-John Wooden
Remember that by the time his contract is up for renewal
the salary cap may be quite different, ie., much higher. The Boys may have plenty of money to resign him even to play RT, which will gain importance if the trend of the NFL towards passing continues..
Wish you were here
HAHA
Yep, and I LOVE it!
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and David Arkin can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Now on twitter: @kegbearerBTB
I'm hoping for better.
Hopefully Dallas hasn’t decided that their problems are solved, and will continue to acquire quality linemen through the draft. Maybe Arkin, Costa, and Nagy are all quality starters, but I doubt it. I’m thinking that a guard and center will be needed soon.
by Baked Potato Soup on Aug 16, 2011 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions
Arkin's still in the mix
But, look for Costa this week. Arkin showed last week that he’s adequate at LG and Costa did very well at C. With Gurode back and Costa taking Arkin’s place, we’ll get a good idea of what that combination can do.
I’ll be interested in seeing how well Costa gets in front of the screens (Arkin did very well) and if he can get to the second level (Arkin didn’t). That’ll be the difference for me…
Leadership is the ability to influence a man to either give his life or take the life of another willingly and with the confidence that what's asked of him is within his ability to do and that his well-being was the first priority of his superior's decision.
Rob Petitti
Was there ever a worse starting O-Lineman in the history of the Cowboys? Petitti was terrible.
"Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but what you should have accomplished with your ability."
-John Wooden
good point, but ...
… Barron was not a full time starter. Thank goodness. He was just filling in for Colombo who was about 1/2 the player he was the year before. That tells you how bad Barron was.
"Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but what you should have accomplished with your ability."
-John Wooden
Barron was the worst backup O-Lineman EVER!!
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
I'll have to take your word for it.
Hard to believe Landry ever had a bad offensive lineman.
"Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but what you should have accomplished with your ability."
-John Wooden
I watched the all time holding champ
Pozderac was putrid
by burmafrd1944 on Aug 16, 2011 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions
I remember it like yesterday...
How he cost us the game vs the Giants at the Meadowlands in Nov 1986. “Holding…number 75…” several times in the final drive that killed us. So we don’t get to 7-2, we drop to 6-3 and we all knew it was over with Danny White getting injured earlier in the game. Landry and the boys were never the same until JJ & JJ got us back on top.
Maybe that’s why I shudder at Sam Young being considered as the swing tackle, Just reminds me of the lanky (I know he’s now added some top-heavy weight) Pozderac…who also was an ex-Notre Dame tackle.
by ChuckCowboy on Aug 16, 2011 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions
He really didn’t hold George Martin. Martin hooked him to make it look that way. Refs bombed the call.
by Jonathan Stern on Aug 16, 2011 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions
I've been a big critic of the Oline for several years (probably the biggest critic).
I never was fond of False Start Adams.
I never was fond of stiff legged Colombo.
I was against the signing of Davis to a $50 million contract (I remember joking when he was signed that it would be more effective to place $50 million worth of gold bars in a pile at RG).
Our front office has been atrocious when it comes to Olinemen for a good while now (Doug Free was more blind luck than front office skill) but it finally seems to be heading in the right direction (oh thank you Jason Garrett!!).
With the well overdue release of Colombo and Davis, the drafting of Smith, resigning of Free and the potential of Costa and Arkin I’m actually optimistic about our OLine future. Incredible. Fantastic.
If this line can play some good footy this year our offense will explode.
Its only going to get better under Garrett
Hey Washington... D.C. stands for Dallas Cowboys
Twitter: @silva918
Since Free was drafted you have to give credit to the front office
They apparently saw something good in him to draft him before anyone else took him. So long as the front office does not reach much and produces a rotation player I think we have to give them credit. As for previous lineman Ireland and Parcells are gone and they were the worst on O-linemen.
Well I still contend they got very lucky.
Dog Free was projected as a 2nd rounder. Going into his last college year he was considered a potential 1st rounder but a foot injury hurt his senior year. When Dallas rolled into the 3rd round, needing OLine help badly, they took… OT James Marten. James freakin’ Marten, while the athletic wonder and LT potential of Doug ‘The Freak’ Free was left on the board.
It’s a miracle Free was still their in the 4th. I vividly remember throwing my hands up in disgust when we drafted Marten and passed over Free. Marten was cut after one year and is out of the league. How anyone in that organization thought Marten was a better NFL Tackle than Doug Free is just bizarre. Thankfully though it appears that those days and decisions may be coming to an end.
Great stuff
Just one thing, bringing in FA linemen WAS the Cowboys style…I smell a change in the wind. While they may look for a vet, I think it will be as a backup and competition for Arkin and Costa…but not a FA that is a definite starter with no competition.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and David Arkin can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Now on twitter: @kegbearerBTB
To replace Holland
A guard that can start if Costa/Arkin/Nagy need a little more seasoning, but primarily to be a quality guard backup so we can bid Montrae a fond farewell.
Jason Garrett - Lord of Order
Rob Ryan - Lord of Chaos
Bill Nagy
He had a really good night. I know he was playing backups, but there are only so many linemen you can keep on your roster, and I would be worried someone steals Nagy from the practice squad, so I could see Gurode, Arkin, Costa, and Nagy being the interior line depth – especially since Costa and Nagy can play C and OG – without another FA pickup.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and David Arkin can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Now on twitter: @kegbearerBTB
Besides of course Kosier
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and David Arkin can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Now on twitter: @kegbearerBTB
We really don't have that many OL on the roster.
Gurode, Free, Holland, Smith, Kosier, Arkin, Nagy, Young, Parnell.
That is 9, we normally keep 9 or 10.
Costa makes it 10
And with some depth issues/concerns elsewhere, the versatility of Nagy and Costa could have them keeping as few as 8 to create spots elsewhere – 4th RB (despite JJ’s claims) or 4 TE’s (Rucker did look good in the passing game), more DB’s, etc.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and David Arkin can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Now on twitter: @kegbearerBTB
Is that a Tyronasaurus?
God Bless Texas
by dwarfknight64 on Aug 16, 2011 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions
HAHA
Small arms but feisty…great analogy
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and David Arkin can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Now on twitter: @kegbearerBTB
Offensive line
Just my opinion but I think every year, the boys need to draft at least one lineman to groom to be a eventual starter. That way you don’t have to wait till the things broken and spend a number 1 on the next Tyron Smith. Don’t take that as me being down on Smith because I think he can be great but rather if the boys followed the model I’m suggesting, then you can spend number 1 draft choices on backs, receivers, quarterbacks and the like. Just my opinion but a lineman should never have to be taken number 1.
by nospinzonefactor on Aug 16, 2011 2:59 PM CDT reply actions
I've said this for years.
8 of the 22 starters are lineman on your team. Every year they should be drafting a lineman in the first 3 or 4 rounds.
I Agree
We Have Neglected Our O-Line Garden. Proper Scouting a Year To Ripen Then Hit It
by meisternance on Aug 17, 2011 5:31 AM CDT up reply actions
We seem to be half way there in rebuilding
Gurode’s Pro Bowl days might be over at 33 and Kosier also needs a replacement at 33. Continue drafting a 2nd – 5th every year and keep rotating them. It keeps the cost down, the legs young and the offense versitile. The most together O-line I remember in recent years was Kansas City. It never got them to the Superbowl. Not sure this togetherness is the best idea when it suppresses the growth of the younger guys.
We're gonna miss Gurode so much after he's gone
by somebodyquiet on Aug 16, 2011 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes and No
Gurode is a good center, but I think he is also overrated as his play has gotten worse. Not that Costa or Nagy are ready to start in 2011, but they did do a good job in one preseason game. Perhaps the rest of the offseason will show us we already have capable replacements.
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and David Arkin can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Now on twitter: @kegbearerBTB
The O-Line the last couple of years
In addition to getting older the quality of play was deteriorating. But they made up for it by running out of gas at the end of the season. Some of their worst games were just when the playoffs started.
This year I believe we’ve fixed the o-line problems, however, the astute observations from the professional analyst will be that Tony Romo has finally learned how to be a leader.
Mark my words Tony’s “improved” leadership will be a story told over and over again if we make the playoffs and have some success.
by staubachfan on Aug 16, 2011 3:26 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Yeah
In addition to getting older the quality of play was deteriorating. But they made up for it by running out of gas at the end of the season. Some of their worst games were just when the playoffs started.
Absolutely.
I’ve rewatched all of our recent playoff loses (06, 07, 09) several times. In combined rankings for the three games there’s no doubt that no unit has performed as poorly as the Offensive Line. Poor blocking in Seattle, especially goal line & short yardage failures (Colombo, Rivera), really hurt us. Against NY Adams and Colombo just got destroyed, especially in the second half, by Strahan and Osi. And against the Vikings Marc Colombo, who should have never even been on the damn field, had the worst performance by an OT that I’ve even seen and it completely derailed the Offense.
There were other players who made poor plays and mistakes in those games too but the Oline lead the charge to defeat in every one. If we can turn this unit around it will do a lot to help our chances late in the year.
Well said
On all accounts
"I am a true believer. Anthony Spencer will have 7 or more sacks in 2011 and David Arkin can ball!" - Kegbearer
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Now on twitter: @kegbearerBTB

by 
























