Eating Crows and I Told You So’s: Jason Garrett and The 2011 Dallas Cowboys in Review
Eight-and-eight, .500, out of playoff contention. These are your 2011 Dallas Cowboys. A team that had every opportunity, right to the very last game, to put naysayers like yours truly in their place. A team that had every chance to show they were ready to take the next step. It’s a bitter taste. It’s bitter to see a team with so much potential, so many times when it looked like they were coming into their own, to end their season in absolute mediocrity.
Four months ago, I wrote about why Jason Garrett, for all his talents, is the wrong man to lead the Dallas Cowboys to the promised land. I presented some criticisms and made a few predictions. Now, with a couple of weeks to digest the 2011 Cowboys season, it’s time to look back and see what was accurate, what missed the mark, and more importantly, what happened to the Dallas Cowboys this year.
1. The Window Is Still Closing
What I said at the beginning of the season:
"There is simply too much at stake. These are prime years for guys like Tony Romo, Jason Witten, and DeMarcus Ware, with the downward slope in sight. There is simply too much talent at stake to risk it on a man who has never led a team before."
Another season in the books, and the core of the Cowboys are another year older. As this article from the Mothership indicates Tony Romo had one of the best seasons of his career, and it was all for naught. Romo stepping up his game has been a long time coming, and in a year where he was (relatively) healthy the whole season through, the team as a whole just could not get it done. It’s a shame that, as BloggingTheBoys' Tom Ryle put it, the team wasted Tony Romo's best season to date.
Moreover, DeMarcus Ware had another banner year on a team that couldn’t make the playoffs, and continues to fight nagging injuries. Add in Jason Witten, who may have just had a down year, but seems to have his window closing as fast as anyone’s. This nucleus of players is getting older and the Cowboys are running out of time to take advantage of some of the cornerstone talent they have assembled.
To the point, while no win or loss can be placed one on man’s shoulders, Jason Garrett and his staff did have some significant coaching miscues that cost the team dearly. JG icing his own kicker is the obvious error, but there were multiple issues with working the clock, using timeouts, and game management, particularly in the fourth quarter. These are the kinks that have to be worked out by a man who’s never carried the big whistle before.
Wisely, JG wanted to be Offensive Coordinator even when Jerry Jones appeared to want to make him the head coach right out of the starting gate. He knew that he needed to learn the ropes and acclimate to leading a team. Well, in the midst of that acclimation process, the heart of this team is getting older, slower, and shorter on time.
2. The Roster
What I said at the beginning of the season:
"The Cowboys have had a receiving corps that other teams would kill for. The team has consistently had one of the most stacked backfields in the league. Dallas’ secondary has long been suspect, but the Boys have also been able to boast a talented linebacking corps and some punishing bodies on the defensive line. . . . I never bought into the chatter that the Cowboys had the most talented roster in the NFL, but undeniably, there have been enough tools available to make Dallas a consistent contender. And there still are."
It’s hard to look at receiving corps with Miles Austin, Dez Bryant, and Laurent Robinson and consider it anything but a dream. Austin was his superb self, when he could stay on the field. Injuries aside, he’s a character guy, and I expect him to be back in full force in 2012. Dez did quite well, but seemed to be one of the players hurt the most by the shortened off-season. The leap from first to second year is often one of the most significant, and I hope a full off-season with the training staff will pay even greater dividends. Of course, Laurent Robinson was the free agent pickup of the year. I really hope Jerry & Co. find a way to keep a player as in sync with Romo as Laurent was this year. All-in-all, the receiving corps. lived up to the billing.
The backfield remains stacked. Felix Jones did middling work, but seemed to step it up when competition made his job a little less secure. DeMarco Murray obviously met all expectations and then some. I hope that he can continue this momentum into the next season. Phillip Tanner was another pleasant surprise, and a credit to the scouts. There are no problems in the Cowboys' backfield.
The crow-eating comes from my comments about the defense. DeMarcus Ware is obviously unassailable. Sean Lee is the brightest young star on the defense, and he pleased everyone with his superior performance. Jay Ratliff did a fairly good job on the line, and there were even flashes of brilliance from guys like Sean Lissemore. That’s pretty much where the love ends, though.
As Kegbearer’s superb piece Grading the Pass Rush explained in more detail, the front seven are not necessarily the Cowboys’ biggest weakness. Nevertheless, the decent if underwhelming Anthony Spencer, the amiable but aging Keith Brooking, and the unknown quantity of Bruce Carter do not necessarily give us anything to crow about among the linebackers. As KB noted, guys like Jason Hatcher and Josh Brent seem to be improving, but the Cowboys defensive line could use some serious bolstering as well. In the end, the front seven are not Dallas’s most glaring weakness, but it’s difficult to call them ready for prime time either. There's no doubt that a stronger pass rush from the Cowboys' forward attack may require new soldiers in the trenches. Still, it looks like the team has found its sharpshooter...
What I said at the beginning of the season:
"The Cowboys have had as many as five kickers on the roster through training camp. After David Buehler’s terribly inaccurate placekicking last season, the Cowboys desperately needed to find another solution. Unfortunately, despite the crowd of kickers in camp, that solution never materialized. The ‘Boys are carrying both Buehler and rookie Dan Bailey into the regular season."
Time to eat some major crow. He certainly had to overcome some rocky times, especially in the middle of the season, but Bailey strikes me as the real deal. Buehler was not and is not a long term solution as a placekicker, and it took Bailey’s consistency to help pop whatever bubble Buehler was resting on. I cannot say I loved the team going through camp with five kickers, but Garrett found his man. He and his staff deserve a great deal of credit for hanging onto Bailey and eventually making him the team's number one kicker.
3. What The Cowboys Gained in the 2011 Draft
What I said at the beginning of the season:
"Garrett proved his worth. His first pick in the draft was his best – USC tackle Tyron Smith. Garrett selected someone who will hopefully be a fixture for the future on the offensive line and who could give the beleaguered position group a shot in the arm. He followed this up by picking guard David Arkin in the fourth round. Arkin was a solid pick. You can find serviceable guard talent in the 4th round, and there’s something the Cowboys just love about four-year starters from small schools, especially on the line. At least Dallas was drafting at a position of need. Garrett even added lineman Bill Nagy in the 7th round for good measure. If there’s one thing to be said for Garrett’s draft, it’s that he paid attention to the line."
If there’s anything that Garrett deserves kudos on this year, it’s selecting Tyron Smith as the first player drafted under his administration. Smith has succeeded beyond any of our wildest dreams, and looks poised and ready to make the switch to left tackle. It's certainly still early, but Tyron looks like a player who could be a cornerstone of this team for years and years to come.
In the same vein, Bill Nagy looked fairly good before his season ended with a broken ankle, and could be, at worst, a solid backup on the line. David Arkin has his supporters, though appears to need more time before the team is willing to depend on him. We also had bonus baby/UDFA Kevin Kowalski acquit himself well in relief. Clearly the offensive line stills needs a great deal of help, but Garrett recognized it as a weakness and made a good effort to shore it up through the draft. He deserves big kudos for the attention he paid to this longstanding weak spot.
The other notable pickup through the draft was DeMarco Murray, who had a great rookie season. We were all disappointed with the injury that kept him from taking his success through to the end of the season. Still, he certainly acquitted himself well in his first year wearing the star, and has a promising future with the team.
That does not, however, justifying spending a third round draft pick on a running back.
What I said at the beginning of the season:
"Now don’t get me wrong. Despite my distaste for OU, Murray looks to be a quality back . . . . There’s just one big problem – running back is the position where the Cowboys have the absolute least need. . . .Dallas needed help at approximately a million other positions on this team before they needed another running back. This need includes: another guard, another safety, another corner, another d-lineman. . . . Running back is one of the most easily filled, plug-and-play positions in football. You never, never, spend money or waste draft picks on a running back unless you’re just positive that you’re getting Chris Johnson or Adrian Peterson."
To this point, as Peter King discussed in his most recent edition of Monday Morning Quarterback:
"Following a regular season in which none of the six leading rushers in football were drafted in the first round, here were the five leading rushers over the weekend:
As we look ahead to the divisional round, here's an interesting note about the final eight teams left in the Super Bowl derby: Only one, Denver, starts a first-round running back ... and Willis McGahee's on his third team, in the twilight."
The point is pretty clear - it’s hard to maximize the value of each pick when you’re taking a running back high in the draft. Murray’s success this year doesn’t change that. What’s more, Felix’s burst coming back from injury may indicate that what the running game really needed was a dependable fullback like Tony Fiametta, not a highly touted tailback.
For those of you who think we’re getting a Chris Johnson/Adrien Peterson type guy in DeMarco Murray, I’ll just offer this caution. At various points over the last decade, the Cowboys faithful have been ready to anoint Troy Hamrick, Julius Jones, Marion Barber, and Felix Jones, as Emmitt Smith’s heir apparent. It’s going to take much longer than half a season of impressive production to convince me that this pick was worth it, especially with many bigger holes in the Cowboys roster.
Don’t misunderstand me, though. Murray appears to be a tremendous back with a fantastic upside. He’s just not the piece this team really needed, and that point stands even amidst his success.
4. What The Cowboys Need in the 2012 Draft
Tom Ryle did a tremendous overview of what the Cowboys need for next season, and I have little to do but agree with him and shake my head. What I said at the beginning of the season:
"[T]he Cowboys have needed help on the offensive line and in the secondary for at least three drafts now, and Dallas’ war room has done little to address them . . . [A]s in 2009, the Cowboys did not touch the secondary until the fifth round with the selection of CB Josh Thomas out of Buffalo. In a year where the entire defense, not just the secondary, had been suspect, Thomas was one of only two draft picks on the defensive side of the ball. He found himself cut in the move to the 53-man roster, meaning that the 2011 draft made only contribution to an ailing defense that ranked 23rd in the league for total defense last year – one injury-prone rookie linebacker."
Well here we are, a season later, and it’s pretty clear that despite the creativity of Rob Ryan, the Cowboys needed a great deal of help on defense, particularly in the secondary. Again, the front seven were not stellar outside of the consistent greatness of DeMarcus Ware and the out-of-the-gate success of Sean Lee. Help at the point of attack, with Ryan helping to pick guys who fit his system, is a priority. Even just one more player who can make a push to the quarterback would go a long way. But as Kegbearer explained, maintaining a pass rush was also not this team’s most glaring weakness.
That honor goes to the ailing secondary that features an aging Terrence Newman, an injury-prone Mike Jenkins, and an inconsistent Orlando Scandrick. These three CBs are supported by the adequate-at-best trio of Elam, Ball, and Sensabaugh. Season after season, Cowboys fans have watched this unit torched by superior firepower. Whether in free agency or through the draft, the Cowboys absolutely have to make at least one strong addition to the defense backs, and hopefully another solid roleplayer to boot. One thing is for sure, with a defense that has been as down and inconsistent over the past two seasons, some help on the personnel front is very very necessary.
To the same end, inconsistent play on the offensive line has plagued the Cowboys for just as long. Tyron Smith was a big step in the right direction, and hopefully Doug Free can re-prove himself on the right side of the line. Nevertheless, the youth movement was a mixed bag for the O-Line as a whole, and the interior is in need of some further fortification. Whether that comes from the highly anticipated David DeCastro out of Stanford or elsewhere, the line continued to be a problem for Dallas in 2011, particularly against the pass rush of repeat offenders like the Eagles and Giants. Something must be done.
5. Déjà Vu All Over Again
What I said at the beginning of the season:
"I expect [Jason Garrett] will field a decent team as head coach. Dallas will struggle, but they’ll have a shot until the end of the season. Unfortunately, that’s just the same old same old."
If there’s an analog to the 2011 Cowboys to me, it’s the 2008 Cowboys. No, the 2011 squad didn’t have the same high expectations that the 2008 team, coming off a 13-3 season, buckled under, but the parallels are uncanny.
Both teams lost an overtime game to the Cardinals in Arizona where they had a chance to win in overtime, but the Cards’ physical defensive line and the Cowboys special teams miscues doomed them. Both teams padded their resume with blowout wins over lesser teams like the Seattle Seahawks. Both teams found themselves blowing big fourth quarter leads in games that would have gone a long way toward gaining a leg up in the division.
The 2008 Cowboys crumbled against the Pittsburgh Steelers, despite leading by ten points going into the fourth quarter. The 2011 Cowboys likewise crumbled against the Jets, Lions, and Patriots in similar fashion, only worse.
"What, me worry?"
Both teams had an up-and-down start to the season. After the first seven weeks, the 2008 Cowboys were 4-3 and the 2011 Cowboys were 3-4. But, Both teams made it to 7-4, giving the faithful hope that they had righted the ship and would sail into the post-season. Most strikingly, despite their mistakes, both squads entered the final game of the season with a chance to make the playoffs. Instead, both teams lost to a division rival in a contest where they were never really even in the game. Both teams finished in third place behind the Giants and Eagles.
The criticisms that were true for the 2008 Cowboys are true for the 2011 Cowboys. They need a great deal of help on the offensive line and in the secondary. There’s talent there, but it’s constantly hampered by a lack of discipline that shows itself in rampant penalties and a failure to stand tough at the end of games. In both cases, the coaching staff, replete with its own array of errors during the season, could not get the best out of the team.
6. A Prediction for 2012
Obviously, this is incredibly early. We haven’t had free agency, we haven’t had the draft, and we’re not even sure what coaches and assistants will be pacing the sideline next year. I also have much more to say about Jason Garrett’s offense and its trajectory under new OC Bill Callahan. Still, the bad news is that Dallas appears poised to regress next year. The 2011 Cowboys benefited from a manageable schedule and a weak division. Even with a third place finish, America’s team looks to be in for some tough sledding next year.
Of course, you never know what’s going to happen from one season to the next. As a case-in point, this year, the NFL had seven new division winners. Still, in 2012 the Cowboys will play the NFC South, which sent two teams to the playoffs (New Orleans and Atlanta) and the AFC North, which sent three (Baltimore, Pittsburgh, and Cincinnati).
They’ll also play a Chicago Bears team that was contending for a playoff spot before Jay Cutler was injured, a Carolina Panthers team that features the likely Offensive Rookie of the Year, Cam Newton, and a Seattle squad that seemed to be putting it together at the end of the season. Add on top of that the Giants and Eagles who both swept us this year, and it doesn’t look pretty.
My prediction is that the Cowboys will regress and finish the 2012 season with a paltry 6-10. As always when predicting a poor showing from the Boys, I really hope I’m wrong on this one. Nothing would please me more than to see Year Two of Jason Garrett’s rebuilding project turn into a big success. I just don’t see it happening. Last year, there was much talk about the "turnaround" JG engineered. This off-season, there’s apt to be much talk about improvement and process and how Garrett is changing the character of this team. In the face of this rose-colored view, I stand by what I said just days before the 2011 Season began:
"If the team had played [as they did for Jason Garrett in the second of half of 2010 for] the entire season, we would have seen the same sort of team that Cowboys fans have seen repeatedly during the Wade Phillips era. It’s a team that is talented but inconsistent, that stands up to big time opponents but has trouble closing the deal. It’s a team that’s right on the edge of playoff contention, but nowhere near reliable enough to warrant great expectations."
Sadly, that still sounds like Jason Garrett and the Dallas Cowboys to me. There are too many holes in the roster. There are too many of the old problems with penalties and fortitude as a team that creep up nearly every game. There are too many of those hiccups almost every new coach faces yet to come. Cowboys are running in place, not moving forward, and it’s going to be a bumpy ride.
For more from CowboyInExile on everything from Sports and Culture to The Simpsons and Zombies, please visit www.TheAndrewBlog.net.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
119 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Getting Jadeveon Clowney would reboot the franchise.
Just like the Giants getting LT.
You pay the price to get him.
It will cost you two whole drafts
Why do you keep bringing up Clowney?
He was a true freshman at South Carolina this year, and will not be draft eligible until the 2014 draft.
by sportsfanatic21 on Jan 17, 2012 10:11 AM CST up reply actions
Maybe he _is_ Clowney
Starting a grass roots campaign.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 10:39 AM CST up reply actions
he might come out early
more to the point
We are going to have to replace Ware. Really replace him not just get another guy to start in his place.
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 17, 2012 11:19 AM CST up reply actions
dude if he was a true freshman
he isn’t allowed to come out early…this isn’t the NBA…The NFL mandates that you have to be 3 years past Highschool before declaring for the draft….
Here’s a theoretical play from 2010: Snap. Tony takes 7 step drop. Tony looks left at Miles, who is doubled, and looks right to where Roy Williams should be…but instead sees Colombo on his back and a Defensive End foaming at the mouth jumping over Marc’s carcass. Tony proceeds to run like hell and look for Witten
-by CotySaxman on Jul 11, 2011 7:50 AM PDT
Now, if somebody doesn’t agree with that, that’s cool. I also don’t agree with the fact that I don’t have $10 million in my bank account. But the fact that I don’t agree with it doesn’t make it any less true.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 AM PST
by I am Ironman!!! on Jan 17, 2012 12:07 PM CST up reply actions
This is just more reason to not take your posts seriously.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
the reason one ought to take anyone’s posts seriously if they have a record of being correct.
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 18, 2012 10:43 AM CST up reply actions
You didn't know the draft rules. You also advocate trading away huge amounts of picks for one players.
I don’t see much reason to take you seriously.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
Maybe if he were wearing a clown suit
That would send us a message!
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 21, 2012 5:47 PM CST up reply actions
don’t know who is a probowl lock. But I think that the players drafted later in the first have lower ceilings than someone like one of the Smiths or Peterson.
As for me I would say either take Tyron Smith or go get Peterson and if you have to give up your number two to get him I say do it. The other player I like is Aldon Smith.
As for the rest of the draft I would try to come up with Marcus Gilbert , Marcus Cannon and Willie Smith.
by Jonathan Stern on Apr 20, 2011 10:37 AM PDT up actions
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 18, 2012 11:30 AM CST up reply actions
I like Smith not really so much cause he is a tackle but because of what he might become.
I don’t really care about the need.
If Jerry Rice was on the board I would say take him even though he is a WR.
by Jonathan Stern on Apr 20, 2011 7:33 AM PDT up actions
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 18, 2012 11:33 AM CST up reply actions
The Cowboys ought to get someone whose name is Peterson or else get someone whose last name is Smith.
by Jonathan Stern on Apr 20, 2011 7:11 AM PDT actions
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 18, 2012 11:34 AM CST up reply actions
dude three posts about Smith
who Chia was hyping back in November of 2010, doesn’t exactly garner a bunch of respect…..
Not saying you weren’t right, but Chia started that wagon……
Here’s a theoretical play from 2010: Snap. Tony takes 7 step drop. Tony looks left at Miles, who is doubled, and looks right to where Roy Williams should be…but instead sees Colombo on his back and a Defensive End foaming at the mouth jumping over Marc’s carcass. Tony proceeds to run like hell and look for Witten
-by CotySaxman on Jul 11, 2011 7:50 AM PDT
Now, if somebody doesn’t agree with that, that’s cool. I also don’t agree with the fact that I don’t have $10 million in my bank account. But the fact that I don’t agree with it doesn’t make it any less true.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 AM PST
by I am Ironman!!! on Jan 18, 2012 11:39 AM CST up reply actions
This the the argument for Aldon Smith and its a good one.
The other teams can put Romo in the hospital but with Aldon Smith and Ware the Cowboys could put the other team’s QB in the morgue.
by Jonathan Stern on Apr 20, 2011 7:30 AM PDT up actions
I would rather have Mario Williams but what counts is how much pressure you have put on the QB.
If your guy is a great pass rusher then it is obvious what you do.
If you think Smith will be a 12 sack a year guy then yoyu gotta take him.
Need or not.
by Jonathan Stern on Apr 20, 2011 8:47 PM PDT up actions
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 18, 2012 11:47 AM CST up reply actions
Chia is great but it was Kegbearer that sold me on Tyron Smith.
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 18, 2012 11:54 AM CST up reply actions
LOL
"I got the 9 on me so I think I'm Romo"
Fabolous
by Archie Barberio on Jan 19, 2012 1:19 PM CST up reply actions
November 27th, December 2nd
Tyron Smith will be a top 15 pick bro I guarantee it
by ChiaCrack on Nov 27, 2010 4:35 PM EST
easy
the best OL in college football Tyron Smith, the next D’Brickashaw Ferguson
thats our pick, simple
unless either Fairley Peterson Amukanamora are on the board
its down to those 4 guys
Tyron Smith should be our pick if they are all gone, its not even reaching
by ChiaCrack on Dec 2, 2010 3:16 PM EST
"I got the 9 on me so I think I'm Romo"
Fabolous
by Archie Barberio on Jan 19, 2012 1:26 PM CST up reply actions
good thing we took smith
I know you said it in December and by the time April there was no way we were drafting prince at 9
"Obviously, I felt like if I ran into my lineman there it was going to help the play" ~Tony Romo
Opinions on Prince varied pretty wildly. Check this out:
I dont think Prince will be there bro, not at all
by ChiaCrack on Jan 13, 2011 4:15 PM PST up actions
I would bet a decent amount of money Prince falls in the draft to where we are.
The last time there was more than one cornerback taken in the top ten was 2005. I also think that Prince will not work out at the combine as well as some would like and that those lingering questions will lead to him falling slightly in the draft. This is just my opinion, but I think Prince will probably be there when we pick. However, that does not mean I would take him automatically because I don’t think it is a given that he would be BPA by any means.
by Creasy729 on Jan 13, 2011 5:54 PM PST up actions
really
bro if Prince falls to 9 that would be epic
wanna bet 20 bucks? dead serious, if you win I will paypal the money
by ChiaCrack on Jan 13, 2011 6:35 PM PST up actions
Hmmmm….
I think I will take that bet.
by Creasy729 on Jan 13, 2011 6:45 PM PST up actions
deal
20 bucks
I say Prince is gone before the 9th pick
you say he falls to 9th right?
by ChiaCrack on Jan 13, 2011 6:46 PM PST up actions
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
hows that 20 bucks? haha
"Obviously, I felt like if I ran into my lineman there it was going to help the play" ~Tony Romo
That is funny!
Although, I’ve made some far, far worse predictions in my time watching the draft nonsense play itself out, so I don’t fault Chia too much on this. (I was one of those who thought Brian Bosworth was gonna light up the NFL. Oops.)
"A successful coach needs a paitient wife, a loyal dog, and a great quarterback. But if you don't have a wife the dog can pull double duty." --Barry Switzer
by Tennessee_Jed on Jan 20, 2012 10:57 AM CST up reply actions
What's funny is I was right, but my reasoning was off.
Prince actually did better at the combine than I anticipated.
Thankfully, I think watching him get eaten up by Blackmon unsettled enough teams for him to fall farther than expecteed.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
replace Ware? Yeah ummm.... ok.
That slacker’s just not pulling his weight right? Or do we have someone who is guaranteed to be just as good? Also, freshmen can’t enter the draft per NFL rules.
"How 'Bout them Cowboys!"---Jimmy Johnson
"...and the Cowboys...STUN the Bills!"--ESPN MNF
eventually we will. Ware won’t be Ware in a few years. What do we do then?
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 18, 2012 10:42 AM CST up reply actions
Dude.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, the real question is, is it a good beer? Realist Larry, 2011
by Realist Larry on Jan 17, 2012 9:21 PM CST up reply actions
Solid post
Good analysis, compelling use of multimedia, visual tools such as charts to reinforce the points. Never been a big fan of self-quoting, though but its a minor quibble.
Perhaps a little more pessimistic than I believe, realistically, it’s hard to see the trend line pointing up. Simply stated, there are too many talent holes on the roster, too many question marks and not enough resources to address all of them.
The good news is we complemented some solid Drafting over the last 2 years with unprecedented FA finds. The bad news is the Scrub component of the roster is so severe – Average now represents an improvement.
'I have wasted Time and Time doth waste me'
Jerry Jones as Richard II - Act 5, Scene 5
Thank you very much!
It’s hard for me to be pessimistic about this team. Nothing related to sports would make me happier than to have JG give me the proverbial finger and show me up with wild success. But like you said, there’s too many holes and not enough plugs. As to the drafting, it’s hard to argue with Tyron Smith. We can only hope to find as reliable a guy at the top of the order this year.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 10:42 AM CST up reply actions
Good post
Kind of a long post to point out the offensive line and defensive backfield are still not good enough. I couldn’t agree more with the wasted running back pick. Felix is plenty explosive if you fix the oline. Don’t even need Felix for that matter. Get a line that can outplay any defensive line— like they handled the Rams defensive—any running back will look awesome. Provide more consistent protection like the Pats, Saints, Packers, and Giants do, and Romo will too look like the greatest ever.
Thank you kindly!
I do think there’s more to the problems with the Cowboys than just the problems in the O-Line and the Secondary, but they’ve certainly been glaring issues for some time now that still need to be addressed. I agree with you whole-heartedly that a better line would pay exponential dividends for the rest of the offense.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 10:44 AM CST up reply actions
Gotta disagree with you here!
1. In the one game that Felix took over for Murray he had exactly 25 touches 22 runs and 3 passes and could not handle the load… after that he wasn’t used because 1 game and full load was too much for him and he couldn’t take it. Backs have to be able to weather the storm and come back. I just don’t see Emmitt Smith sitting on the bench and watching his team play. Not tough enough to be a lead back… simple as that. He’s part time and maybe 12 touches a game. Murray is a full time back… the only game I saw him really winded in was the 253 yard game. We have needed a back and it was a great pick in the 3rd. The 2nd round baffled me… why take an injured ILB that had no way of getting on the field that year. Maybe he will be a great LB (maybe) we will find out how that turns out next year because I’m sure that Brookings won’t be here.
2. Felix Jones has not had one healthy season since he started here after taking over for Murray in the Gnats game he had 106 yrds in the first game… and 108 yards then not one over 50.
3. Murray had 824 yards rushing and 156 yards receiving in 7 games. Imagine a 16 game season on those averages and that’s 2240 yards from scrimmage over 16 game season. I’m not ready to give him the Emmitt crown but I’m not going to let you or anyone else say he was not a good pick in the 3rd.
RexP
by Rex Pfister on Jan 17, 2012 6:12 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks for the thoughts
1. I agree that Felix is better suited as a change of pace back, but if you really thought so poorly of Choice, then the solution was to pick up someone in FA or off of waivers because RB is one of the most easily-filled, plug-in-play positions rather than spending a 3rd round draft pick where the F.O. could help rebuild a defense that badly need some new blood.
2. If your beef is with a lack of healthy seasons, the knock on Murray in college was that he couldn’t stay out of the training room, and we’ve seen that at least somewhat vindicated with his ankle injury. I think the “injury prone” label is often throw about unfairly, but Murray might not be the poster child for a healthy, productive, every down back if that was the goal.
3. Sample size. Sample size. Sample size. Let’s see if he can do it over 16 games, or, if like most running backs, he starts to wear as the season goes on, and has periods where he runs hot and cold.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 18, 2012 9:26 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Murray ought to be used like a Tony Dorsett. He is not built for heavy use.
15 carries a game is plenty.
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 18, 2012 11:10 AM CST up reply actions
Nice post agree with most of it
but I have to disagree with you on Murray, he was def worth a third round pick
He who laughs last, thinks slowest
"Pleased to meet you, hope you guess my name"
"Really love your peaches, want to shake your tree"
by BigBad Joe on Jan 17, 2012 10:30 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Don’t misunderstand me, though. Murray appears to be a tremendous back with a fantastic upside. He’s just not the piece this team really needed, and that point stands even amidst his success.
So you are not a BPA kind of guy for the draft i take it ?
He who laughs last, thinks slowest
"Pleased to meet you, hope you guess my name"
"Really love your peaches, want to shake your tree"
Not purely BPA, at least
I think you have to have a balance between BPA and need. You obviously want to go with talent, but you don’t want to load up in areas where you’re solid at the expense of major holes in your roster. Yeah, you might draft a guy higher than he would otherwise go, but if the alternative is that he’s gone the next time you’re at the podium and you start the season with a big question mark at that position, I think it’s worth it.
That said, I do believe you ought to draft guys who you think will be able to play. If you look at the highest rated CB on the board and just don’t think he has the stuff, then by all means, pass him over. The problem I have with the Cowboys’ drafting as of late is that we have enough needs to where just getting solid roleplayer guys at certain positions would be a world of help and neglect those areas to further arm an already loaded compliment of offensive skill position players.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 10:52 AM CST up reply actions
I guess that
with MB3 going to be let go due to cap money, and injury concerns with FJ we were not “stacked” at RB, and they figured it was worth it….and in this I would agree with the Cowboys FO.
Thanks for the follow up
He who laughs last, thinks slowest
"Pleased to meet you, hope you guess my name"
"Really love your peaches, want to shake your tree"
The only points I would add are that RBs wear out quickly these days and that replacements are easy to find. Maybe not elite ones, but solid ones who can get the job done are fairly abundant. I still think FJ and Choice were plenty to work with, and that even if the FO disagreed, the draft was too costly a place to attempt to patch that up, particularly with all the attention the defense needed.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 3:09 PM CST up reply actions
Only one problem!
FJ gets injured too much and your boy Choice can’t seem to wrap up a ball if his life depended on it. They went with Felix to start the season and Choice and Murray spelling him. Choice fumbled the ball 3 or 4 times… sad thing is that he goes to Washington the following game and get 7 yards on 6 carries. This is what you wanted us to go forward with.
RexP
Nice. The overblown optimism that starts each off season does nothing but
hamper our vision and any objective assessment of the team which can lead to real improvements. I’ll give this team 6 – 7 wins. Romo alone is worth 3 wins and Ware another 1 win. The final 2 – 3 wins are the result of other individual achievement.
It discouraging to witness division rivals NY and Philly are strong precisely where the boys are weak: on the line. Unless jG can improve this, this team will continue to get OWNED.
Thank you and I definitely agree
Giving Romo time to throw and creating running lanes for Murray & Felix has to be a big priority, especially when there’s dates with Pierre-Paul and Babin twice a year.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 11:05 AM CST up reply actions
I disagree with a lot of what you say
Mainly because as many people have pointed out an offseason isn’t really a time to put a team in place, especially with all the turnaround on the roster.
As to your point about regression. I agree that next year is tougher. But the thing you have to understand is that the Dallas Cowboys will be a “better” team. What does this mean? Well, I expect the Boys to finish with the exact same record as this year, i.e. 8-8.
People will probably be upset with another 8-8 team not realizing the SOS changed dramatically from one year to the next.
Not to nitpick but these were the names of guys taken after Murray:
3 72 New Orleans Saints Martez Wilson LB Illinois Big Ten from Washington [R3 – 2]
3 73 New England Patriots Stevan Ridley RB LSU SEC from Houston [R3 – 3]
3 74 New England Patriots Ryan Mallett QB Arkansas SEC from Minnesota [R3 – 4]
3 75 Seattle Seahawks John Moffitt G Wisconsin Big Ten from Detroit [R3 – 5]
3 76 Jacksonville Jaguars Will Rackley G Lehigh Patriot from San Francisco [R3 – 6]
3 77 Tennessee Titans Jurrell Casey DT USC Pac-10
3 78 St. Louis Rams Austin Pettis WR Boise State WAC
3 79 Washington Redskins Leonard Hankerson WR Miami (FL) ACC from Miami [R3 – 7]
3 80 San Francisco 49ers Chris Culliver CB South Carolina SEC from Jacksonville [R3 – 8]
3 81 Oakland Raiders DeMarcus Van Dyke CB Miami (FL) ACC
3 82 San Diego Chargers Vincent Brown WR San Diego State MWC
3 83 New York Giants Jerrel Jernigan WR Troy Sun Belt
3 84 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Mason Foster LB Washington Pac-10
Good picks: Mason Foster, already picked a LB
Demarcus Van Dyke, don’t know much about him
That’s about it. I don’t like drafting RBs in the 3rd, however, the production I look for from a RB is not Rushing Yardage but Receiving Yards. In that respect if you look at him as another weapon in the passing game, much like Buffalo uses Fred Jackson, he was worth his pickup
I'm not saying Tony Romo is the reincarnation of the mythical Romulus. I'm just saying
Also very good post
Just cause I disagree doesn’t mean I didn’t like it
I'm not saying Tony Romo is the reincarnation of the mythical Romulus. I'm just saying
Thank you for the kind words, especially when you disagree
I fully acknowledge the point of this being way early. I would love love love to be wrong and have Jerry, Stephen, and JG retool the roster and make a splash next year. Just projecting based on where the team is right now.
I also think the team will be lucky to be 8-8 next year. Again, you never know who’s going to suddenly be good and who’s going to fall off a cliff. (i.e. San Francisco gets a bye and Pittsburgh gets bounced in the first round, and Chicago doesn’t even make the dance?). But I think 2012 is going to be a rough season in terms of the competition. I do agree that if the team is 8-8 next year, they’ll be a better team, at least looking at it from right now.
As to the draft, we could have gone with Moffitt, was doing well prior to injury. My personal choice would have been to go with Chris Culliver who looks to be a solid guy the secondary, or failing that Van Dyke. Better yet, we could have picked somebody other than a McDonalds-loving LB coming off of ACL surgery in the second round to help the line or the secondary, and if the front office really wanted a linebacker they could have picked up a guy like Foster in the 3rd who might have been able to contribute this year.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 1:54 PM CST up reply actions
Fanshot
If you want to link to your blog do it in the fanshots. We want stuff for Btb not someone just trying to get hits for their website. Takeout the link at the bottom and everything will be kosher.
And you really need a better pic than one from 2006 or so to lead off the article. haha
"Obviously, I felt like if I ran into my lineman there it was going to help the play" ~Tony Romo
I was wondering when the crap that picture was taken!
I was gonna ask even the second picture was really old too.
Optimissum Prime sees nothing but the best for America's Team!!!
by Cowboys_Attack on Jan 17, 2012 1:06 PM CST up reply actions
Going for discussion on BTB, not hits. The last time I did a fanpost, the best part was hashing it out with everyone in the comments, and I was hoping for the same thing here.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 1:14 PM CST up reply actions
Then removing the link at the bottom of the article would go a long way.
"Obviously, I felt like if I ran into my lineman there it was going to help the play" ~Tony Romo
Which link?
The link to his blog?
I don’t see why he should have to as most users are going to be reading and commenting on things here.
If he didn’t go to the trouble of actually re-posting everything here, I would agree that he should fanshot it.
Since he actually DID post everything here, it’s a legitimate fanpost.
its kinda borderline
I know what you are saying, if he wrote it on his site and then just copy and pasted it, that may not be kosher
but idk the specifics of what happened, so I will leave the Sheriff Of Fan Posting up to you my friend, we know you run a clean program
"I got the 9 on me so I think I'm Romo"
Fabolous
by Archie Barberio on Jan 17, 2012 7:08 PM CST up reply actions
Haha, you are right it is borderline
And could get out of hand real quick. Its still a great post, just the endorsement at the end is what does it.
"Obviously, I felt like if I ran into my lineman there it was going to help the play" ~Tony Romo
no I feel you there
when I ran my blog for a hot minute there in the summer, I usually put a fanshot up to my article instead of posting it on here
"I got the 9 on me so I think I'm Romo"
Fabolous
by Archie Barberio on Jan 19, 2012 1:19 PM CST up reply actions
You have reached full ridiculousness with fanshotting this.
It annoys me each and every time you do it, but this is a good article with alot of time and effort put into it.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
"Meanwhile, like a bitter wine, Philadelphia’s jealousy fermented in the dark cellars of pride and resentment. With no playoff hopes of their own, Eagles fans turned towards hating the Cowboys." Steve Sabol, NFL films
by Nickthegrip on Jan 21, 2012 10:42 AM CST up reply actions
While we are pessimistic for a bit
I will say that if next year they absolutely tank. I would really like them to go all out to get Barkley. At that point we shouldn’t pussy-foot around the fact we are rebuilding and REALLY hunker down.
But Romo's not the problem
Is the idea to groom Barkley under Romo? Again, this is prior to this year’s draft and FA, but that would be at the expense of a defense that will likely still need some solid roster additions.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 1:32 PM CST up reply actions
No he's absolutely not the problem
But if the team gets worse? You have to think about that. Romo is being wasted at that point
by Specific on Jan 17, 2012 3:45 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
So what do you do with him?
Trade him for parts and give up on this “era” of the Cowboys? I don’t know. It’s hard to give away a player like Romo. Then again I’m sure the Jimmy Johnson trade was a tough one too.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 3:48 PM CST up reply actions
Mostly the idea is thinking about how many times the cowboys would be in a position to get the next qb. I don't think they would pass up the opportunity
by Specific on Jan 17, 2012 6:37 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Sure, but it's a tough call drafting a QB at the top of the order anyway
And I’d think Jerry would give it a run with Romo over the next 2-3 years, almost no matter what.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 9:07 PM CST up reply actions
6-10? Wow...that is a pretty depressing prediction.
I agree this team has holes, but you are saying that all of Dallas’ opponents next don’t or won’t. That everyone is going to get better next year except Dallas? Dallas was five plays from being 13-3 this year. True, it didn’t happen, but they were on the cusp. You have to factor in the new coaches too…Callahan and Henderson. Not sure you did that although you mentioned it.
Trust me, I'm as depressed about it as anyone
I do think there will be some musical chairs in the standings as there always are. But even if there’s some attrition in the competition, I still think the Cowboys have a tough slate next season. The problem as I see it is that the Cowboys have been five plays away from success for a long time now. As the record indicates, they’re a coinflip team. In 2010 the Cowboys opened with a series of close, coinflip games and lost all but one of them. Likewise, this Cowboys team was within a touchdown in all but a handful of the games this year. It’s not that Dallas doesn’t have talent, it’s that they don’t have consistency, and it’s hard to see that changing.
As you pointed out, the brightest spot here is the shakeups on the coaching staff. When I sat down to write this article I got started talking about JG, Callahan, and the Offense but realized there was too much I wanted to say to squeeze it into an already long article. Suffice it to say, I would love to see Callahan calling the plays and giving the offense a new twist. Rob Ryan getting his guys in to coach the D and jetisoning old regime guys like Bill Campo ought to help out as well. I just expect it to be too little too late.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 3:16 PM CST up reply actions
How can it be too little too late?
It’s the offseason. They didn’t have one last year and with all of the changes AND injuries this year, they still finished 8-8. Now they have an offseason, new coaches and JG has another year of experience under his belt. Change is good.
by TheCowboyFan on Jan 17, 2012 3:40 PM CST up reply actions
Because I think we’re running out of time with the core of talent on the Cowboys and by the same token that there’s too many other holes to fill on the roster in too little time. I definitely like the coaching changes thus far this offseason, I just think they might be trying to spin straw into gold. Though, as noted, I don’t really trust JG as HC.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 3:52 PM CST up reply actions
In 1988 the Cowboys lost a lot of close games they went 3-13.
The Cowboys didn’t win more games because they weren’t good enough.
The Cowboys were also a few plays away from being 6-10 again.
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 18, 2012 11:13 AM CST up reply actions
Trust me, I'm as depressed about it as anyone
I do think there will be some musical chairs in the standings as there always are. But even if there’s some attrition in the competition, I still think the Cowboys have a tough slate next season. The problem as I see it is that the Cowboys have been five plays away from success for a long time now. As the record indicates, they’re a coinflip team. In 2010 the Cowboys opened with a series of close, coinflip games and lost all but one of them. Likewise, this Cowboys team was within a touchdown in all but a handful of the games this year. It’s not that Dallas doesn’t have talent, it’s that they don’t have consistency, and it’s hard to see that changing.
As you pointed out, the brightest spot here is the shakeups on the coaching staff. When I sat down to write this article I got started talking about JG, Callahan, and the Offense but realized there was too much I wanted to say to squeeze it into an already long article. Suffice it to say, I would love to see Callahan calling the plays and giving the offense a new twist. Rob Ryan getting his guys in to coach the D and jetisoning old regime guys like Bill Campo ought to help out as well. I just expect it to be too little too late.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
I say 8-8 again
Split games with WASH and NYG, swept by PHI and then only 4 other losses
O.K., let's try a bit of a bet.
What will it take for you to admit that you were wrong about JG and this team in general? 8 wins against next year’s schedule? 10?
Because there are signs of an improving team which I think you are just plain missing. This team will not be under .500 with JG at the wheel. It will not even regress from this season, which was disappointing for all kinds of correctable reasons.
This is like the early Jimmy Johnson era: incremental improvement from season to season. This season we went up by 2 wins (from 6-10 to 8-8) while hampered by several factors (lockout hurts new coaches/ young players/ rebuilding teams). 2012 we go up by another 1-2 wins, depending on injuries/ schedule. By January 2014 our elite players we make a serious run in the playoffs.
Bank on it.
How about this?
If the Cowboys win six games or less, I win the bet. If the Cowboys win 10 games or more, you win the bet. Anywhere from 7-9 and we’ll call it a wash.
If I lose, I will write a minimum ten stanza poem commemorating the greatness of Jason Garrett. If I win, your signature has to consist of nothing but “Jason Garrett should not be coaching the Dallas Cowboys.” for the duration of the following off season.
Sound fair?
For whatever it’s worth, I think the 2010 Cowboys were, in terms of talent, an 8-8 team. But then they caught some bad breaks early, knew their coach and season were goners, and gave up. I think that if the 2010 Cowboys had something to play for every week, they would have gone 8-8 as well. That’s why I’m loathe to call this season an improvement. You’re right to point out the lockout as a hindrance, and maybe with a full off season (and more importantly a separate OC) to set the tone, this team will take on a different character next season.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 3:43 PM CST up reply actions
Hhaha
I bet 7-9. Someone should do a fan post where people place bets of some sort after the draft and free agency
by bitterlyhonest on Jan 17, 2012 4:04 PM CST up reply actions
I'll take the bet, but
I think it’s unfair. Your prediction is that the Cowboys only win 6—and you win if your prediction happens. My prediction is that they get better, not worse, every year ("go up another 1-2 games). That is, if next season is 9-7, I’m spot on right in my prediction (they got better despite a tougher schedule) and your prediction is way off (no more than 6 wins)—yet you call it a “wash.”
Now that I’ve pointed out the discrepancy between what you say (6 wins) and what will probably happen (9 wins, which you will call a wash), I totally agree to the terms of this deal. There is no chance I’ll have to change my signature (short of season-ending injury to two of their three players), and there is a chance that the Boys will have a monster season and get you to write that poem.
that was supposed to read
two of their three best players. Not implying they only have three players. Some on here may imply that, but not me!
Alright then
How about 7 wins and under and I win the bet, and 9 wins or more and you win, and 8-8 is a wash?
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 18, 2012 8:46 AM CST up reply actions
That's not fair
You said 6 wins, he said 9. How about 6 and under, you win. 9 and over, he wins. 7 or 8 is a wash. You don’t get a 1 game buffer if he doesn’t.
OR, if you’re leaning on that buffer, he gets one too. 7 or lower, you win. 8 or above, he wins.
O.K., I'll go there.
This is more risky for me, since I’m less sure that the Boys won’t slip to 7. (6 just ain’t going to happen.) But it also gives more chance of me getting to read your paean to JG, since 9 seems pretty likely to me (more so than 10).
I could quibble that your prediction (no more than 6) gets a 3-game pad before you pay, while my prediction (no less than 9) gets only a 2-game pad. But I’ll spot you the one extra game.
The bet is on!
You're on!
And just to try to even out the buffer ever so slightly, how about we say that if the team pulls a 2011 Denver or a 2010 Seattle and makes the playoffs at 8-8 or 7-9, you win the bet.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 18, 2012 2:21 PM CST up reply actions
Start picking out your...font?
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 18, 2012 6:15 PM CST up reply actions
13-3 2012
"Obviously, I felt like if I ran into my lineman there it was going to help the play" ~Tony Romo
Sounds like 13-3 2011
Just Saying
I'm not saying Tony Romo is the reincarnation of the mythical Romulus. I'm just saying
With Romo this team has the chance to go 13-3 every year!
"Obviously, I felt like if I ran into my lineman there it was going to help the play" ~Tony Romo
Bold, very bold.
I’d trust a coffee shop run by you.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 3:49 PM CST up reply actions
I see a 2 game improvement, 10-6
"I got the 9 on me so I think I'm Romo"
Fabolous
by Archie Barberio on Jan 17, 2012 3:51 PM CST up reply actions
If they don't make the playoffs next season I would trade Romo and any other core player in their 30's.
This teams core guys careers have been wasted. At some point you have to go in a different direction. Jerry never filled in the holes for this team. He left it all up to Ware, Rat , Romo and Witten.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 17, 2012 4:13 PM CST up reply actions
Can't agree on Romo
He just had his best season & don’t see him declining anytime soon. Ware & Witten may be declining, but still see a window of opportunity as long as Romo is sharp.
by 99yard_TD_Run on Jan 17, 2012 9:27 PM CST up reply actions
Sticking with 6-10
Just a rough sked.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 3:53 PM CST up reply actions
Excellent post
The refreshing honesty of your fanposts are always appreciated. Like you, I don’t have a particularly bright view of our future, which given the aging talent base, if probably only going to get worse.
A 6-10 record is a real possibility. What’s amazing to me is by my measures Romo had clearly the best year of his career, and not only did we not make the playoffs, we weren’t even over .500. When a team has a career year at the most important position, they need to make a deep ride into the playoffs. Odds are, Romo won’t be able to repeat this performance next year, our offense will probably still be disorganized and sloppy, and all the talent leaks springing on our defense can’t possibly be fixed with one draft. Lee is the only player who we can feel good about being better next year than this year. The other two excellent defenders, Ware and Ratliff, are still very good but now on the downside of their careers.
I wish you would post here more often. You see through all the marketing hype and provide a clear-eyed view of this franchise.
This is just speculation
Romo has steadly increased his performances over the last 5 years… nothing else can be said. I don’t think Romo’s skill weakends over the next couple years and may improve with experience as it should. Some of the plays he tries to make… he learns are just too risky and he tosses it away. This is something that’s learned with experience and he had a few of those moments this year. I don’t want him to lose his confidence but temper it with experience. Then you see the maturity aspect coming into play. Look at Romo this year compared to 2007… you see a totally different man. Look at Brady in comparison to his first 3 superbowl years…. just saying this because Brady INT percentage has dropped considerably as has Romo. Brady is throwing missles and is 34. Do you think the Pats are looking for a new QB this draft? yea ok.
RexP
by Rex Pfister on Jan 17, 2012 6:41 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
The Patriots got their QB of the future last year.
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 18, 2012 11:14 AM CST up reply actions
The odds of a quarterback having the best season of his career at the age of 32
Is not impossible or even remote, but it’s not likely. And Romo’s performance has not steadily increased with each year. There’s no way his 2008 season was as good as 2007, or 2010 was as good as 2009.
You also are confused about my original post. I never suggested we should draft a new quarterback, only that the talent base of this team is on a downhill slope. Young teams will get better the following year; older teams decline. We are destined to be in decline for at least another year, and probably more than that.
Even if Romo can’t repeat the statistical year he had this past season, you don’t think at least one of the holes (O-Line, Secondary) on this team improve just enough to cover the difference, and leave us at another 8-8 season or slightly better? I find that hard to believe. My optimistic prediction is 13 wins, but my actual tempered expectation is in the 8-10 range. No worse than this past year, but with improvement or actual quantifiable improvement in the W/L category.
Romo's performance in part will be a because of the offensive line
So, yes, I’ve already factored that into account. The impact of the offensive line on quarterback performance is massively overrated in any event.
I agree completely.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
You're very kind
Thank you for the compliment. I’m pretty busy, but I am a frequent reader if not a frequent poster.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 21, 2012 6:42 PM CST up reply actions
I gave you a rec even though I disagree with almost
everything you said after eating crow. Oh btw looking at all the crow you ate… should I say anything about the upcoming predictions you made or are you just going to eat more crow?
RexP
btw I'm still looking at another 8-8 to 9-7 next year.
Then in 2014 I think we will bust out and have a 12-4 or better season. Now that could change if we make a big splash in FA and have a great draft. Three players could potentially fill a number of holes. Start with… FA signings of Nicks and Mario. Then the drafting of DeCastro and Mark Barron … and if Dre or Jenkins get dropped into the 3rd. It could be an interesting draft.
RexP
I said that?
It’s a shame that, as BloggingTheBoys’ Tom Ryle put it, the team wasted Tony Romo’s best season to date.
I’m not doubting you. I just don’t remember that (of course, I sometimes can’t remember what I did two minutes ago).
Formerly Pineywoods - different name, same cockeyed view of the world.
Jason Garrett - Lord of Order
Rob Ryan - Lord of Chaos
In retrospect you may have just been characterizing the content of the article from the mothership
“Finally, there is a very insightful piece from the mothership about how the team wasted Tony Romo’s best season to date.”
I can edit it out if you’d prefer.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 9:16 PM CST up reply actions
Ah!
That makes sense. Those “link dumps” do lead me to quote things I would not necessarily say myself.
I hate to get credit for things I didn’t do. I’m kinda funny that way.
Formerly Pineywoods - different name, same cockeyed view of the world.
Jason Garrett - Lord of Order
Rob Ryan - Lord of Chaos
I'll go ahead and edit it out for you.
Sorry.
www.TheAndrewBlog.net
by CowboyinExile on Jan 17, 2012 9:30 PM CST up reply actions
The Cowboys have to hit HR's in FA and the draft or your prediction will be too true.
It’s not impossible, but there were already holes to fill and now there are more.
I’d say the odds of finishing under .500 next year are pretty high…whereas the odds of getting the playoffs are pretty low.
Not impossible, but unlikely.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, the real question is, is it a good beer? Realist Larry, 2011
Wow I must really be imbibing massive amounts of Kool Aid.
I don’t see us as far off the tracks as a lot of folks. I think if we score at least 3 starters on defense and a center and guard on O, it just might push us over the edge. Turn those close games we endured into wins instead of losses.
I also believe JG will be much improved next year with help from Callahan in regards to clock management and play calling. And if Romo had his best season last campaign, why wouldn’t he have a better one next year?
Lastly, the way injuries hit us really affected our final few games. I think if Murray hadn’t broken his ankle we would be watching this team in the playoffs this year. We weren’t that far from taking the division.
I started out with nothing and still have most of it left
For a rebuilding year,
no off season, change of coach, etc., all you want is incremental improvement. You don’t expect to go from 6-10 to 10-6 in one year. You just don’t.
Next year, against a harder schedule, we may go 9-7, not win a playoff game, and people still won’t see the incremental improvement. Or we may go 10-6, and lose to someone really good in the first round of the playoffs, and people will STILL want JG’s head.
I want the bling too. But it’s going to take us a while to get there.
by boyman on Jan 18, 2012 8:03 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
9-7 with this schedule
would actually be a significant improvement.
Its gonna be a tough year. I think Cincy may be overrated, and Seattle at any moment is a 2-14 team waiting to happen imo, but Chicago is a very good team, and the South division outside Tampa will be competitive.
If the Redskins somehow get RG3 (and I’m feeling like they’ll find a way), we will have Vick x 2, RG3 x 2 and Newton on the schedule. Better stock up on the athletic linebackers.
I've seen this for 15 years straight
Our regular season record is 120-120 since 97.We were 8-8 this year.I’ll go with 8-8 next year.It’s the same team almost every year.It has enough talent to win and gets close and doesn’t seize the opportunity.If we manage to get in the playoffs we can rarely if ever do anything significant.I’ve been a fan for 42 years and they need a qualified Football person to run the team like 30 other teams do and let the HC be the sole voice for the team.JJ is the one constant this whole time and he is the one to blame.
I see 4-12
They get 2 vicotires aghainst the deadskins…they beat browns and bucs and that is it
1-3 aganist AFC north, 1-3 against NFC South, 2-4 against NFC East, 0-2 against bears and seahawks…..
i'll take that bet....
Giants simply arent any better than the Cowboys and thats simply a fact - Terry
The Giants are NOT better than the Cowboys...thats the reality - Terry
I want in on this action too
Here’s a theoretical play from 2010: Snap. Tony takes 7 step drop. Tony looks left at Miles, who is doubled, and looks right to where Roy Williams should be…but instead sees Colombo on his back and a Defensive End foaming at the mouth jumping over Marc’s carcass. Tony proceeds to run like hell and look for Witten
-by CotySaxman on Jul 11, 2011 7:50 AM PDT
Now, if somebody doesn’t agree with that, that’s cool. I also don’t agree with the fact that I don’t have $10 million in my bank account. But the fact that I don’t agree with it doesn’t make it any less true.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 AM PST
by I am Ironman!!! on Jan 18, 2012 10:35 PM CST up reply actions
"Troy Hamrick, Julius Jones, Marion Barber, and Felix Jones"
All got their “props”, “numbers”, and “should-be-starter-status” as backups. Murray was THE guy from the get go when Felix went down. Different situations. I’m just saying that Murray was the guy to focus on. I didn’t like the pick at the time, but I’m sold on Murray right now. You could be absolutely 100% correct though.
you have no clue how many games the Cowboys will win next year and don't pretend like you do
Lifelong Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/
I would love to show you the finer points to a muay thai clinch whipped knee to the face seanrude
by matt575 on Nov 22, 2011 3:09 AM EST
We are too weak in the middle
On both sides of the ball to win more than 9 games. But who knows… If the following is true-
Carter is a stud
Oline Youglies develop
Murray isn’t injury prone
We get a good/great pass rusher
We get at least one good/great player for the secondary
Unfortunately it would take nearly everything on that list for this team to go places next year.
MacGruber!
Back to 12-4
This year we will win those close games and another solid draft will help. Garrett is the answer at HC and guys like Callahan don’t show up and produce losing seasons. No lockout means more time to prepare, and now that we’ve established, if you show up out of shape you get cut, we might actually accomplish something this year.
You’re either on the Garrett-train – or you’re not. The NFL is more competitive now, and defense is the culprit. You have to prevent big plays and get rushing TDs. Callahan is a young Houck and Henderson is a young Landry. They just need players who can execute. I’m not convinced that TNew is gone yet, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t go after a CB with the #14 overall pick, especially if DeCastro is gone.
I wouldn’t be surprised if we picked a DE 1st since we clearly lost games without a DE who can get sacks. We also lost because we couldn’t keep other teams from collapsing the pocket. We have the same holes we did last year, but seem to be solid at ILB. I think you will see lots of Carter/Lee this year…
The window is closing? Not on Bruce Lee or Demarco Jones… the window just opened.
Bruce Carter – #1 ILB in 2011 Draft, #33 S out of HS
Sean Lee – #1 ILB in 2010 Draft, #50 ILB out of HS
Demarco Murray – #1 in 2011 Draft, also #1 out of HS
Felix Jones – #5 in 2007 Draft, #19 out of HS

by 































