I read that Monster cable wants to have Craigslist and Ebay shut down because people sell their used Monster products there and that some how takes the luster off the Monster name.

You listen to metal, take a band like Revocation. Their new album is pretty good, but they’re a smaller band and most people haven’t heard of them. They need every album sale they can get, not only for the money but to spread their name and grow their fanbase. It’d be far easier for their record label to find four buyers to pick up Chaos of Forms for three bucks than it is to find one guy to pay ten for it. I would also argue that even three people buying an album at three bucks a pop is better than one buying it at ten a pop. That’s two extra fans that will catch the band the next time they’re on tour or maybe even buy some merch, that’s worth losing a dollar in record sales. RIAA’s a downright mess and ASCAP isn’t getting any better either.

There’s nothing even close to remotely true in this collection if non-sequitur statements. Google and Wikipedia are vermin organizations? Wikipedia is a fairly populist organization, I can hardly see how it’s a liberal organization. Google has started to donate to Republican candidates almost as much as Democrats. Wikipedia went black for a day to protest a bill, what would be the Exxon equivalent? Close shop for a day? I’m about as liberal as they get, and I’d hardly have a problem with that. This post doesn’t have a point, at least not one based in fact. All you’re saying is “I hate liberals.” So what? You’re entitled to your opinion but just stating that you don’t like liberals isn’t really moving the conversation.

Wiki is changed by people at any time. Not all the info is accurate but they don’t require a purchase from them in order to contribute. Now oil companies in general have lobbyist that are in contact with the government trying to influence decisions to benefit themselves. People are upset at that and its been said for decades now.

Now I don’t always agree with Google but the fact that its paid money out to build wind farms and then pre bought electricity giving more capital to windfarms I can forgive their trip to China.

All of this I smile at considering it was the brainchild of lamar smith who is a long time Republican of a very red rural section of Texas that now reaches from outside San Antonio to Austin. Are Democrats and Republicans involved………..yes. Everyone involved is probably get some negative feedback for this. But its not all at the feet of the evil Liberals.

It’s odd that a bill authored by Lamar Smith is this dirty piece of liberal evil. I guess Alex Jones got to him.

That sure does show a liberal bias yup. Considering that individuals write the articles, you are bound to run into disinformation due to bias – don’t like it or think it is false then get off your ass and correct it.

Go find me some BLATANTLY wrong articles on science, history, biographies, art – you name it.

And I can point you to the individual user who edited the article into wrongness. In twelve years of using wikipedia I have run into ONE instance of blatantly wrong information – Someone had trolled the entire US history entry and pretty much made a complete mess of it. Within hours the page was restored to it’s correct state by restoring the previous entry. Every article that has any ambiguity about its information is flagged as such, the people who frequent wikipedia do a damned fine job of policing the site.

Please, evolution and climate change? Name any credible scientist that denies those. My god you’re an idiot.

Wikipedia is contributed to by a range of people whos personal opinions is what ultimately shows up as part of the site. Since anyone can change it at any time then yeah ultimately on that site there is freedom of speech. Doesn’t mean its accurate but its all opinion, much like your stance on that particular site.

Its not that you didn’t define it. We can see your stance, theres really not a real point associated with it.

Youtube in general searches through and black outs, removes, or bans people for posting certain things anyway. Its been that way for years, most sites have something similar. Plus just because you live in country that allows “freedom” doesn’t mean it carries over to a site that you have to agree to terms in order to use it. Basically you agree to play by their rules, youtube being one of them.

Infowars owner Alex Jones is a nationally syndicated radio host whose broadcast appears on an ever-expanding list of big mainstream radio stations. Jones has been afforded feature profiles by the likes of Rolling Stone Magazine, who acknowledged his role as a pioneer in the media world

Infowars.com is clearly a legitimate and important news website that features original content which routinely makes an impact and occasionally goes viral. And yet Google de-listed the website from its news aggregator on a whim with no explanation provided. Since Google and its owner Eric Schmidt are prominent financial contributors to the Obama campaign, we can only assume we were blacklisted for political reasons..

Taken from your own link and you call us sheep?

There is NOTHING in this article that actually proves Google is against freedom of speech, its purely opinion.

You know there are other search engines then google right?

Since Google and its owner Eric Schmidt are prominent financial contributors to the Obama campaign, we can only assume we were blacklisted for political reasons..

Assuming is what you do well. If they were so hell bent against the site why would they unblock it? Politcal pressure? If they are guilty for what you claim then pressure would mean nothing right.