Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: L'Equipe Claims He's Coming To Chelsea On Five Year Deal

Rookies: Liquid Assets or Long Term Investments?

Nfl-draft_medium

via lesterslegends.com


In the financial world, something investors are taught to watch for is the liquidity of the investment that they are putting stock in. This is important because as an investor you may need to be able to pull out quickly to limit loss or realize greater potential in another investment. Conversely, you could also be looking for a long term strategy to park your gains without too much oversight. In an investment of that nature you typically want a safe steady rate of return, the emphasis being that when the investment matures, you want it all to be there without depreciating.So which strategy could best apply to our draft choices? The answer is debatable, but as with any investment strategy, you want a good mix to both minimize risk while ensuring a good gain. Too much of one or the other, and you are either exposing yourself to unnecessary risk, or not taking enough risk to realize a proper gain.

I feel that under previous regimes, they focused too much on the long term, and we were missing out on too many short term "liquid" opportunities, and our overall "portfolio" suffered.

During Jason Garrett's tenure as head coach so far, we have seen waves of change, both from a procedural stand point and from a cultural standpoint. I was hoping that one of those changes, which we were unfortunately robbed of the opportunity to properly gauge due to the lockout, was a change in the propensity of the club to play their rookies and 2nd year players.

Star-divide

With the previous regimes, often we as fans were burdened with watching declining play from veteran starters, with what seemed to be a capable younger player waiting in the wings. Often, the only reason a younger player was able to crack into the starting line-up was due to an injury, and had little to do with outplaying the entrenched veteran starter. Even when they did play, it always came with the understanding that they were likely not the answer or a long term solution ("Don't get out the anointing oil" and Columbo replacing Free in the starting lineup during the 09 playoffs specifically come to mind, though there have been many others). This all severely tempered my expectations from drafts, as returns where very often not realized until three years down the road, or in some cases even later.

What we saw last year from Garrett, even with a shortened (non-existent?) offseason, gives me optimism that in the coming draft, rookies will not be held back simply because it is their freshman season in the NFL. If they outplay their competition, they will earn the spot and playing time. With rookies and 2nd year players Tyron Smith, Demarco Murray, Dan Bailey, Sean Lee, Dez Bryant and to a lesser extent, Bill Nagy, Kevin Kowalski, Phil Costa, Sean Lissmore, and Phillip Tanner all seeing significant play time is an unexpected, and pleasant, approach from what we have seen in seasons past, and I have hope that it will be continued this season.

Also, as we watch for our next round of pet cats, it is interesting to note that in the draft last year, the first time we dipped into the small school pool was in the 4th with Arkin, and he was not active for the year. All of the impact young ‘uns came from large schools/conferences. Kowalski coming from Toledo would be the exception, though that is due to all the injuries suffered and not because he overtook a position. Lissemore also did some impressive things this season, though it seemed like the coaches had him fighting an uphill battle and didn't play as much as many of us would have liked. Regardless he had to fight and claw his way into the rotation. This should be something to consider when looking at these prospects, and may be a reason to look at a guy like Leonard Johnson from Iowa State, as opposed to someone like Josh Norman from Coastal Carolina. Likely this has something to do with level of competition, and trying to keep the game from overwhelming the player.

With this in mind, as I keep an eye out for the next group of Cowboy's draft prospects, I now look not only for those that are talented at their position, but also those that with a full off season, may be able to make an impact this season, as opposed to seasons down the line. Finally, I feel that our enthusiasm for the draft is well placed, and we no longer will have to temper our expectations with the draft completely, as Garrett and co will look to cash in with more liquid investments.

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Comment 15 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice Post TCW, rec'd

My question is this: based on what you said in the last paragraph

I now look not only for those that are talented at their position, but also those that with a full off season, may be able to make an impact this season, as opposed to seasons down the line.

in your opinion, do you think a guy like Michael Brockers gets drafted by the Cowboys? Or do you feel he’s one of those guys who will be an impact player down the line?

"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."

by Rohpuri on Jan 25, 2012 5:37 AM CST reply actions  

Thanks

I like Brockers and think that he is an impact player, however, that being said, he is also raw. I kept noticing him in the title game, to the point that I added him to my “players to watch list” for scouting…NEXT season. I was shocked when I heard that he declared early. I think that he has the talent to start, and maybe with a full off season can be an every down player, but that is a lot to ask of a kid with not a lot of experience at the college or pro level.
To answer your question, imo he is somewhere in between. Great talent, but may need a little seasoning. I think his length and burst alone would earn him a starting position at the 5 tech. Add to the fact that he is from an SEC title contender, and the fact that Ryan likes a heavy rotation anyway, I see him playing early.
You also have to remember that if this guy did have the experience that everyone is looking for, he would be way out of reach at the 14 spot (and may still be picked before then).

by TheCowboyWay on Jan 25, 2012 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed

if he had experience he would be a consensus top 10 pick. maybe even top 5.

"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."

by Rohpuri on Jan 25, 2012 3:52 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

+1 TCC rec'd

To add to what you stated we tend to also ride out some investments past the point of appreciation instead of trading them while they still have value and limit our declining returns from them. I would love to have all the great Cowboys retire Cowboys, but some times in the interest of improvement and an organizations continued success you can’t be afraid to do so. We did it in the past and it helped build a super bowl team. Great write up, it is definitely nice to see us playing these young bucks, I believe there is no other way for them to learn to play in the NFL then actually playing with live rounds in a game, practice is great to hone your skills and develop muscle memory and conditioning, but nothing simulates live action.

by DCB* on Jan 25, 2012 9:56 AM CST reply actions  

Thank you

And great point about hanging on to depreciating assets… it has been a source of great consternation for some time.

Hopefully, with the rooks playing early and earning jobs, we will not notice this trend as much. However, the problem then becomes identifying the downward trending players BEFORE they start declining, and making the necessary moves. I think we saw a little of that last season (jettisoning Andre Gurode for ex.), and will be another area to keep an eye on, but like with the rookies I think that Garrett has us headed in the right direction.

As far as turning those declining assets into future commodities, i think that its been a league wide trend the past 5 years or so to stock pile picks and not trade them away so easily. Front offices wizened up, and now more often are willing to take potential over known commodities (whether right or wrong). Veterans just aren’t what they used to be, especially with the new rookie pay scale.

by TheCowboyWay on Jan 25, 2012 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

NP great write up TCW (Sorry),

I might get a lot of flack for this, but I feel the key is not to identify downward trending vet’s (that would be too late as that would not net us good or great future picks as other teams will see the downward trend as well), but to identify ones that are peaking or maybe a year or 2 away from there perceived inevitable downward trend that we still have under contract for 1-2 more years instead of trying to “milk them for every ounce” (no one is going to offer anything for a player we might not resign and release anyway, so we must have them under contract for at least the next season). This will offer the suitor to still get value out of the player and net us value pick/picks in return. These players I figure would be in the 27-31 yr old range (depends on the position as well of course) and would depend on what our roster depth is like, so instead of resigning them to a contract that takes us with them into their downward trend and then releasing them with out any compensation and possibly taking a cap hit in the process we would also avoid possibly paying too much for players which allows better maneuverability. I do see a lot of promise in the FO as of late, seems to me Stephen Jones and JG are on the same page more so than it being a product of JJ and JG. I might need to clarify, but this is a comment and I’m trying to keep it short.

by DCB* on Jan 25, 2012 2:10 PM CST up reply actions  

"BEFORE they start declining"

Just re-read and saw that, that is the key. We just can’t hold onto players because we are afraid if we might make the mistake of letting them go too early especially when they are aging.

by DCB* on Jan 25, 2012 2:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Love the Post TCW.

I the evaluation process sometimes the team ignores the value of an under used asset at the time when its value has peaked and missed opportunities to gain. i.e. The possible trade of Bennett and Choice. These were both under used assets that could have been used to get greater gains. The trades were never made and now the value is gone. Sometimes , even if a player is good, the value he could bring in return exceeds the value to the team.

by oldboysfan on Jan 25, 2012 6:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Choice is a good example

they bungled that one hands down. i think we have a similar situation brewing with current fan favorite Tanner, will be interesting to see how it plays out. Do they learn from their mistakes or repeat them?

by TheCowboyWay on Jan 25, 2012 6:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Very good work C-Dub.

I was going to start a comment instead of jumping into someone else’s, but your question makes me ask one of my own. This may seem obvious. Wade Phillips was definitely of the ‘play the veteran’ persuasion. Parcells was even worse about it. Do you agree? Not that they wouldn’t play high profile rooks, but it seems like Garrett is more willing to pull the plug on a vet. Or maybe it just seems that way.

Some of it may be because Jason had to in the case of the o-line. Would Murray have taken the lead back role if Felix had not gotten hurt? I know Carter is only 14 months removed from an ACL, so I don’t know if you can count him. But if he could play special teams, I wonder why he couldn’t beat out Brooking or Brady, at least late in the season.

We have the goal of winning Super Bowls. If you don't have that, find the door.
Jason Garrett

by White Wolf on Jan 25, 2012 10:52 PM CST up reply actions  

thanks, wade and parcels both loved them some vets

I am not sure what would have happened with Murray, though I do know that even with the shortened offseason, he was practically handed the #2 RB job. Really, if “Felix had not gotten hurt” is something we have all been wishing for for a long time. Felix is usually impressive when he is playing, but he has just proven to be too fragile. Did we really think that Felix was going to go the whole season without sitting out at least a few games? As the #2 I think JG knew Murray was going to get his chances.

As for Carter, I wouldn’t read to much into it. For all intents and purposes, he was coming off of a nasty injury while trying to switch positions in the pros (4-3 OLB to 3-4 ILB) and learn a pro defense that has a different mantra from the read-and-react one that he came from. He just got hit with the perfect storm of “not ready”. This season, no excuses.

by TheCowboyWay on Jan 25, 2012 11:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Very interesting and unique take on things

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

by 5Blings on Jan 25, 2012 10:38 PM CST reply actions  

TCW, I read this on Rohpuri's rec, and I am %100 on board. Rec'd

Romo paid the price for our yuglies experiment , never seemed to calm down subconsciously, IMO, but at least we tried. IMO, we should have done a hard roster churn i 2008. but, early 2010 at the VERY latest. Our staff is on the upswing and we will soon be a very different team than we were eighteen months ago.
Also, even the shrewdest Cowboys fan can not really complain about our UDFA and late round production.

What is the star now? A fallen piece of hardened plastic? The heaviest franchise in American sport? A false idol adored by many millions? The epitome of all that can be achieved with hard work? All that can be lost with too strong a sense of entitlement? A welcome coping mechanism, distracting from the real negativity on Earth? A bonding and separating agent?

by BlueNSilverBlood on Jan 25, 2012 10:51 PM CST reply actions  

we should have done a hard roster churn i 2008. but, early 2010 at the VERY latest

If only… JJ and co were pushing so hard to get deep into the playoffs now that they become short sighted. Making the playoffs in 09 really doomed this team for the next couple of seasons. If they had been a little more shrewd during that period, especially the 2 tweener years between CBA’s, we could have been in an unprecedented cap position this year. All of those bad contracts could have been dumped with no recourse, and Pricey veterans brought in with ridiculously front loaded contracts. Sigh, but instead we did it a season too late, and get left holding the bag. Out of all of the questionable moves that the FO has made over the years, this is the one that irks me to no end. It was just business FAIL 101.

However, there is no use crying over spilt scotch, and as a fan I at least have seen a marked improvement and have reason for optimism going forward.

by TheCowboyWay on Jan 25, 2012 11:10 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

And the clouds opened, and the Angels sang...

in a good way. That was a pretty nice picture of our last few years, and current projection.
Maybe JJ let it happen so that he would not be charged with tampering over the “Cowboys Bargaining Agreement”.
I’m just playing, I’m just playing.

What is the star now? A fallen piece of hardened plastic? The heaviest franchise in American sport? A false idol adored by many millions? The epitome of all that can be achieved with hard work? All that can be lost with too strong a sense of entitlement? A welcome coping mechanism, distracting from the real negativity on Earth? A bonding and separating agent?

by BlueNSilverBlood on Jan 25, 2012 11:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Omarav_small
The 17 Years Myth
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Bedtime Stories Part 1: What KMAAN
222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
2012: Random Thoughts about Anything but a Quiet Offseason
Demarco_murray_st_louis_rams_v_dallas_cowboys_baxpocve6rkl_small
Headed in the Right Direction...(Delusional or Reality)
Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...

Recent FanPosts

Small
Jenkins Or Spencer
Small
Beat the Pass Rush
Small
Romo and the Super Bowl Question
Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants
Small
A LETTER TO MIKE JENKINS...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn