Why can't ends rush the passer in the 3-4?
Since the season ended, I've been facinated by ebb and flow of opinions on this blog about what we need to do to shore up our defense. A key issue is getting more pressure on the QB. Yes we need a corner to replace Newman. We need a safety. We need depth at ILB. We need Bruce Carter to step up next year and be the second round steal the Cowboys projected him to be.
Kegbearer had a really insightful and rational defense of Anthony Spencer that has changed my mind about the need to replace him: Kegbeaer's Pass Rush Grades.
Before reading that post, I was thinking we needed to get an OLB to replace Spencer. Now I'm wondering if that's really the way to increase pressure on the QB.
When you read about the pass-rushing advantages of the 3-4 defense, the idea is to enable the pass rush to come from one side or the other, keeping the defense guessing. That's fine if you don't have Demarcus Ware on one side. But as long as Ware is on one side of the line, the other OLB is not going to be an elite sack artist because he's not going to get the chances. Consider the choices:
1. Blitz with both OLBs and all three lineman.
2. Send Anthony and not Ware.
3. Send both OLBs and drop a lineman into coverage.
The first scenario is the most predictable blitz package. So it's the easiest to prepare for if you're the opposing defense. The second package uses the only Cowboy who can consistently pressure the QB as a coverage guy. Of course, you can count on some announcer saying how great Ware is in coverage while the rest of us are asking why the heck the team is wasting its best pass rusher on TE coverage. The third package is playing with fire as a running back drifts into the flat and starts waving frantically in the hopes of getting a fat guy out on the dance floor.
More after the jump.
All of this pass-rush discussion brings us to the big question. What is the best way for the Cowboys to get consistent pressure on the QB? Part of the problem is having some depth and a rotation so that the line doesn't get worn down. But there seems to be a lot of conventional wisdom that a DE in the 3-4 can't be an effective rusher. I'm guessing that's because most of those guys tend to be 300+ pounds and not as quick and agile as guys like Ware or even Spencer. But why do you have to put a fat guy at DE? On the 4-3, teams have lighter guys at DE, guys with frames similar to Ware. On the Giants, for example, Piere-Paul is 278. Justin Tuck is 268 lbs. And Osi Umenyiora is just 255 lbs.
Other examples: DE Jarred Allen (22 sacks) is 270 lbs; DE Jason Babin (18 sacks) is 263; DE Chris Long (13 sacks) is 270 lbs. In contrast, OLB Terrell Suggest (14 sacks) is 260; OLB Aldon Smith (14 sacks) is 258. So there is not a huge size difference between the best OLBs and the best DEs who get sacks. At the end of the day, the best 4-3s use two fat guys and the best 3-4s do too.
In contrast, we have Coleman at 306 (one sack), Spears at 317 (one sack), Lissemore at 306 (two sacks) and our sack artist, Hatcher at 302 (4.5 sacks).
Why not have one of those more agile guys opposite Ware and along side Anthony Spencer? That way, you really could mix up blocking assignments by alternating which one you sent and periodically sending both.
Obviously, you can't put just anybody at DE. It has to be someone who can get pressure on the QB. It also has be someone who can team with Spencer to stop the run on that side, something that Spencer is actually great at. If that guy comes in a 300 pound package, so be it. But if he looks more like a 3-4 OLB, maybe that's not so bad.
Separately, neither DE nor Spencer might get double digit stats. But the two could be deadly together. The main thing is that the Cowboys need to get pressure with four men. If they do that, then blitzes will be even more effective. And QBs will throw more interceptions and incompletions.
Now if we could get a widebody at NT and move Ratlif to the other DE spot, next to Ware, I'm thinking it's going to be pressure city for opposing QBs.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
88 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
3-4 de's can rush the passer. .....on other teams, just not Dallas,
Dallas can’t draft 3-4 de’s. Dallas won’t draft a nt. Jerry is stubborn this way. The 3-4 has been a fail because Jerry won’t draft the talent it requires. When Jerry falls in love (Rat) with a player he gets too comfortable. Frustrating.
Sign Nicks and Osi in free agency. That would be signifigant upgrades to both lines. Then return to the 4-3 and I think the Dallas d would once again become a force. As everyone on this blog like to say , it’s a passing league. Well then add a pass rusher on the d line. It ain’t hard.
Right now we are looking at college de’s projecting them to olb’s. Only Upshaw actually played in a 3-4. Btw even if we did switch to a 4-3 I still would be for drafting someone like Poe..
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 27, 2012 7:24 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
other than Alignment
what is the difference from the Dallas 3-4 and a 4-3?….think about it….
of a possible 545 possible passing plays Ware rushed on 477 of them…and remember Ware almost a game,s worth of snaps between the Tampa game and I think the the 2nd Philly game…
that means that Ware even with missing nearly a full game, rushed on 87% of passing plays. The idea behind the 3-4 is that the opposing Offense shouldn’t know where the 4th rusher is coming from…if Ware is pass rushing what 90%+ of the time, isn’t Dallas already running a
4-3?
So how would lining Ware on the line help the pas rush? Which is why I figure you want to move to a 4-3 right?
Here’s a theoretical play from 2010: Snap. Tony takes 7 step drop. Tony looks left at Miles, who is doubled, and looks right to where Roy Williams should be…but instead sees Colombo on his back and a Defensive End foaming at the mouth jumping over Marc’s carcass. Tony proceeds to run like hell and look for Witten
-by CotySaxman on Jul 11, 2011 7:50 AM PDT
Now, if somebody doesn’t agree with that, that’s cool. I also don’t agree with the fact that I don’t have $10 million in my bank account. But the fact that I don’t agree with it doesn’t make it any less true.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 AM PST
by I am Ironman!!! on Jan 27, 2012 8:09 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
You figured wrong Ironman.....In a 4-3 u line up the 4 best guys and bring it.
In a 3-4 you have all kind of exotic blitzes and you don’t always have your 4 best guys rushing. Even you can’t deny that. Who the hell cares about dropping d linemen in a zone blitz ? I don’t wan’t linemen covering zones.
if Ware is pass rushing what 90%+ of the time, isn’t Dallas already running a
4-3?
Not even close.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 27, 2012 10:51 AM CST up reply actions
but Does Dallas do this?
I rarely see Dallas dropping Linemen into Coverage…
Here’s a theoretical play from 2010: Snap. Tony takes 7 step drop. Tony looks left at Miles, who is doubled, and looks right to where Roy Williams should be…but instead sees Colombo on his back and a Defensive End foaming at the mouth jumping over Marc’s carcass. Tony proceeds to run like hell and look for Witten
-by CotySaxman on Jul 11, 2011 7:50 AM PDT
Now, if somebody doesn’t agree with that, that’s cool. I also don’t agree with the fact that I don’t have $10 million in my bank account. But the fact that I don’t agree with it doesn’t make it any less true.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 AM PST
by I am Ironman!!! on Jan 27, 2012 11:35 AM CST up reply actions
Quick questions and I'll MY opinion
In pass rush situations what’s the most common defensive front?
4-man fronts…
What can you tell me about the pass rush in those situations?
Good effort?
There’s this belief that a change of scheme is a panacea that will cure everything that ails the Cowboys… Good luck with that…
Arnold, almost 5 years of good memories, you'll be missed.
Viva México! Go Cowboys!
Has nothing to do with being the pamacea....
has everything to do with being easier to draft for. However Jerry doesn’t draft d linemen with high picks. Spears is the last one in how many years ? When the Gmen see a good d lineman they draft him. Doesn’t matter how many good ones they already have. Btw they are going to the second Superbowl in 4 years. We haven’t sniffed an nfc championship game.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 27, 2012 3:47 PM CST up reply actions
panacea..........had surgery today still groggy
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 27, 2012 3:47 PM CST up reply actions
you got the Kardashian butt implant surgery you have been saving up for?
"With the 14th pick in the 2012 NFL Draft.........The Dallas Cowboys select..............Melvin Ingram DE South Carolina"
My card has been sent in
by Archie Barberio on Jan 27, 2012 6:51 PM CST up reply actions
Its been outlawed
It would spell mortal danger for anyone standing behind him so doctors are forbidden.
The Garrett Guillotine demands more blood!
by Blue Eyed Devil on Sep 5, 2011 3:30 PM PDT
If you're going to eat poison, you might as well lick the plate.
LMAO Chia
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 5:55 AM CST up reply actions
As far as I remember...
Back in the 2nd part of the 90s and early 2000s it wasn’t easy to Draft 4-3 players either… Ellis was called a bust, pretty much like Spencer is today… Carver WAS a bust…
And looking around the League I can still see that it isn’t easy… There are still an awful lot of highly rated DLineman and LBs that go bust.
Drafting, as a whole, ain’t an easy matter.
Arnold, almost 5 years of good memories, you'll be missed.
Viva México! Go Cowboys!
ellis was not a bust he average +10 sacks a year..
He was a solid veteran DE .. Spence is a complete bust by draft status
by lostar2009 on Jan 28, 2012 4:41 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
"Ellis was called a bust"...
As in: I’m not calling, or used to call, him a bust.
But the guy was drafted 8th Overall because of his talent and didn’t develop as well as what was expected. The guy was good, but that’s it.
Would you call the use of such a high pick in a player like him a success? I wouldn’t. Top 10 picks should bring some of the best players in his position… Which brings again the point: Drafting, as a whole, ain’t an easy matter.
Arnold, almost 5 years of good memories, you'll be missed.
Viva México! Go Cowboys!
The Ellis pick still leaves a bad taste in my mouth
When Randy Moss fell, I was ecstatic. The Cowboy’s offense was getting old at the point. They still had the triplets, but everybody was playing close to the line and blitzing the &^%$ out of Troy because they had no deep threat to make teams play.
For all of Moss’s antics, he could ball like few other could. Put him on the Cowboys, and we had a legitimate shot for a couple more Super Bowls. I was on the phone with my brother, and the pick was announced, I said to him “who the f&^% is Greg Ellis?”
That was an opportunity blown. I think because of that pick, Jerry is less shy about drafting (or signing) a player with questionable “character.” Greg Ellis might have been a great character guy (actually, I laughed when at the end of his stay at Dallas, he was a big whiner in the locker room because of the switch to the 3-4), but talent wins more football games than character.
TRU DAT !!
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 5:08 PM CST up reply actions
+1
Check out www.TheAndrewBlog.net
Follow @TheAndrewBlog
by CowboyinExile on Jan 27, 2012 11:39 AM CST up reply actions
The problem is just that
trying to get a pass rush with 3-4 ends. What makes more sense on a passing down, putting more defensive tackles out there or more pass rushing defensive ends. Pass rushers don’t just go around the edge all of the time, they can come up the middle too. And on pass rushing situations, how many DTs do we have out there? 2 or 3 (as a 3-4 DE is a 4-3 DT) Having that clogger in the middle is nice, but if he isn’t a pass rushing threat or someone that can consistently collapse the pocket when he knows he is trying to rush, then he needs to not be on the field. Same with guys like Lissemore, Hatcher, Spears and Coleman. I would rather replace at least one of those guys with Butler to get more pass rush and then have Jay Ratliff and (maybe) one other down lineman.
"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle, victorious." –Vince Lombardi
by ProBowlFactory on Jan 29, 2012 9:25 AM CST up reply actions
+1 Mensa and Ironman, I have posted this much in other threads as well,
“We can and have found them, but FO doesn’t like investing on the D-line, it has been neglected for years.
When we do find the diamonds in the rough (I believe we haven’t drafted one before the 3rd/4th round and most being 6th,7th, or UDFA) we do not retain them because the FO doesn’t value them or do not want to allocate funds there."
“Don’t I know it, but it proves we can find them
2005 – Seems Parcell believed that in order for the team to be successful they needed D-lineman
Spears – DE 1st round, 20th overall (avg)
Canty – DE 4th round, 132 overall (good)
Ratliff – DE 7th round , 224 overall (good)
2006
Hatcher – DE 3rd round, 92 overall (good)
Montavious Stanley – DT 6th round, 182 overall (NC)
Bowen – DE UDFA (good)
2007-2009 – 3 yrs not one D-line player drafted nor UDFA
2010
Lissemore – DE 7th round, 234 overall (seems to be pretty good)
Josh Brent – DT UDFA (need to see more, but ok)
Recap
- Only 1 D-lineman taken in the first
- 2 in the 3rd round
- 1 in the 4th round
- 1 in the 6th round, and the only NT/DT drafted since like 2003
- 2 in the 7th round
- 2 UDFA
9 total (7drafted + 2UDFA) and we have hit on at least 4 and maybe 5 players and when you are taking them that late I’d say that is pretty good. The problem is we do not value them and therefore do not retain them. What if we had kept Canty and Bowen let go Spears. We would have IMHO a pretty good start : Hatcher, Canty, Ratliff, Brent, Lissemore & Bowen."
“Still would like to see a big 3-4 NT, therefore I do not have a problem trading down for Poe
if he is worth it, but if not better get Ta’amu."
by DCB* on Jan 27, 2012 8:48 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
my point is
we haven’t drafted DL high at all recently
2007-2009 – 3 yrs not one D-line player drafted nor UDFA
and I miss Chris Canty, big time
"With the 14th pick in the 2012 NFL Draft.........The Dallas Cowboys select..............Melvin Ingram DE South Carolina"
My card has been sent in
by Archie Barberio on Jan 27, 2012 10:28 AM CST up reply actions
I don't miss him bowing when we're down by 35
But he’s better than any DE we have right now.
I will awaken my expectations for the Cowboys when Jerry Jones is in the ground.
by Lord Humungus on Jan 28, 2012 4:50 PM CST up reply actions
+1
I was mad when the let him go and stuck with Spears. He was good for like 6+ sacks every year. Yeah, I think he might have been worth the contract that he wanted to stay. Although being from Brooklyn, I think he wanted to leave and play for NY…
"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle, victorious." –Vince Lombardi
by ProBowlFactory on Jan 29, 2012 9:27 AM CST up reply actions
Ok maybe not 6+
but he was a good pass rusher and much better than what we have now, and those are the player you need on 1st and 2nd down, 3-4 ends that can also get pressure.
"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle, victorious." –Vince Lombardi
by ProBowlFactory on Jan 29, 2012 9:30 AM CST up reply actions
If the Cowboys had kept Canty and Bowen they would have had to release several other players.
Spears is a “bargain” for what he is. Canty and Bowen are expensive.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
"Meanwhile, like a bitter wine, Philadelphia’s jealousy fermented in the dark cellars of pride and resentment. With no playoff hopes of their own, Eagles fans turned towards hating the Cowboys." Steve Sabol, NFL films
And that's the problem....
Bowen and Canty are both better than Spears. Who did Jerry keep ? Spears. It ain’t hard.
Jerry doesn’t get it. Then he talks about Canty being “his” 4th round pick now playing for the Gmen. You let him walk Jerry. So shut up.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 5:59 AM CST up reply actions
Canty isn't all-world
Chris Canty got 4 sacks this year playing with the Giants in all 16 games. But wait … that is his best season sack total ever. In 7 years of playing time, he has a total of 16 sacks (he’s only missed 8 games in those 7 years so no excuses there).
You let him walk Jerry
Canty’s contract was for 6 years and $42M. At that price, he would have been the 2nd highest cap hit on the Cowboys in 2011
Steve Bowen was signed at 5 years and $27.5M — not cheap for a guy who was a backup.
Really good big guys are very expensive, and average big guys are just plain expensive. The problem with have a deep defensive line is that it is expensive.
Anyway, you really cannot sign big guys. You have to draft them. Pierre-Paul rookie contract was for 5 years and $20M. On the free market, he would probably be getting $8-$10M/year easy …
You can never draft too many big guys and you can never draft too many cornerbacks. For anybody who thinks the Cowboys should draft a QB, my thought is that you can easily find a serviceable backup QB in free agency. However, good big guys are hard to find and they aren’t cheap. Dallas should be getting one or two players on the offensive line in the draft this year and the rest should be on d-lineman and the secondary.
Both better than what plays in Dallas right now.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 5:10 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, I touched on that part as well in another post, but let's not neglect how important these guys really are.
And when you get a good one you need to find a way to keep them.
exactly parcells switch this team to a 34 and knew the rules for it
You have to always draft and develop players for it.. Lbs and De …
As mention they are hard to draft so you should. Always spend mid or higher picks on it every year
by lostar2009 on Jan 28, 2012 4:45 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
And people wonder why Ware isn't getting any help.
“Control the line of scrimmage and you control the game”
“Starts with the big guys up front”
“Games are won and lost in the trenches”
I hear these things all the time (I echo them myself) from coaches, media, etc., so this is no secret, but why does it get neglected so often. sigh!
by DCB* on Jan 27, 2012 10:42 AM CST reply actions 3 recs
good point dude
"With the 14th pick in the 2012 NFL Draft.........The Dallas Cowboys select..............Melvin Ingram DE South Carolina"
My card has been sent in
by Archie Barberio on Jan 27, 2012 6:50 PM CST up reply actions
+ a billion
I’m right there with your man. It’s annoying to repeat every year too. We had chances but I know the FO didn’t even take a look at NTs. Like if you look at the things the dallas cowboys website talk about most the time they seem to defend Ratliff as a NT and quickly change the subject to CB or OLB then offensive line. I told them on the Talking Cowboys radio the other day…
“Jerry is wanting Lee and Carter to be as good as the MLBs from San Fran but noone is addressing the fact that in front of them is a Defensive line that isn’t undersized. Jay Ratliff needs to be moved over to DE for them to thrive and for our defense to get better. I can’t see how anyone wouldn’t agree by now unless we’re moving to a 4-3 which I don’t think is a good idea by any means…”
They asked “Why is Ratliff in the pro bowl”… In my opinion I think he did well but as a pass rushing DT so he’d belong in a 4-3 or at DE in our 3-4 because is best stats most likely came from a nickel package or something and not the traditional 3-4. So he needs to move (whether he likes it or not!!!). We finally changed the game and drafted a Offensive lineman in the 1st, it’s about time we tried to apply the same level of commitment to the defensive line now… Specifically the NT position!
God 1st, Family Always & Dallas Cowboys 4 Life!!!!!
Which is why I am not opposed to them trading down for Poe and possibly picking up another second rd pick.
In turn it’ll give us some extra ammo to address are many other needs.
I have thought about the same thing.
OR, trade down and pick Glenn to shore up the OG spot, and use that extra second on Ta"amu if they like him better. Either way it serves the same purpose.
"I’m not in the meetings and not part of the discussions; it’s not my responsibility. . My responsibility is to go out and win tonight. My focus is to win tonight. The club has to look at more than just this year." -Michael Young
3-4 defense ends ought to be able to rush the passer
Bruce Smith
Leonard Marshall
The Cowboys DEs aren’t special so there isn’t any pass rush.
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 27, 2012 11:53 AM CST reply actions
A DE in a 3-4 is not a DE in a 4-3
Where you are anticipating both of you OLBs to rush the passer in the 3-4, the DE’s in a 3-4 are more defensive tackles than ends.
The difference is between an outside pass rusher and an inside pass rusher. Ideally, you want your outside pass rusher to have enough speed to turn the corner on the OT. If he is chipped (e.g., with a RB or TE), they’ve got to have other moves (e.g., a spin or swim) or hope the QB holds it for a longer time than normal. Anyway, a good outside rusher needs to have some speed.
Inside rushers work always work in traffic and if they are any good, they’ll be doubled by the center. You either have to be mega-quick (like Ratliff — and there are few players like Ratliff) or you need to be powerful in order to collapse the guard/center back into the QB.
The goal of your inside rushers is less to sack the QB than to push the center/guard back into the QB and prevent him from stepping into a throw. If you get a sack, it’ll either be on a busted play, a scramble, a stunt, or something other than a situation in which you beat your man, one-on-one, and then take down the QB.
The problem with putting a “light” guy at DE in a 3-4 is that he’ll be man-handled during the run and the DEs in a 3-4 are primarily run-stoppers. Also, light guys don’t do well in traffic. As such, unless he is rushing the edge, he’s not going to be very effective.
You also have to remember that the 3-4 is just the base defense. When it comes to passing downs, the Cowboys are more likely to employ a traditional 4 down lineman look with Ware and Spencer (or Spencer’s replacement) playing the defensive ends. I assume that once Rex is able to get deeper into his scheme, on passing downs, you see more exotic looks. For example, instead of having 4 defensive lineman (counting Ware as a defensive lineman) you’ll have Ware and 3 quick linebacker types rush the passer and confuse the defense as to who is going to be coming from where. You cannot do that on 1st down because of the threat of the run, but when the down and distance is favorable, you can get more exotic.
What is the best way for the Cowboys to get consistent pressure on the QB?
Two ways: players and scheme. When you have Ware, you’ve got the player, and Ware takes the pressure of anybody else.
The scheme is what takes average players and puts them into positions that get above-average results. I cannot pass judgment on Ryan’s scheme until he has a full off-season to put it in and have the guys be comfortable with it (i.e., the guys should be running Rex’s defense, not thinking about the defense). I think one problem in 2011 is that neither James nor Brooking were suited for the role of the quick linebacker blitzing through the gaps opened up by Ryan’s scheme.
If Bruce Carter can hold up, he might be a guy that can give you 4-7 unexpected sacks during the year.
Also remember, that while getting sacks are great, you don’t need a sack to be effective in disrupting the passing game. Still the Cowboys were 7th in the league in sacks this year.
by Conn Cowboy on Jan 27, 2012 12:14 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
2 things on this point...
that neither James nor Brooking were suited for the role of the quick linebacker blitzing through the gaps opened up by Ryan’s scheme.
that is why we need a huge nt…..Rat isn’t big enough to occupy 2 blockers for the whole duration of the play. He isn’t big enough. If he get’s stonewalled on his initial push then it’s Katy bar the door. No ilb will get inside.
Point 2. blitzing ilb’s means fewer defenders in coverage. This is why the Gmen are having success. They rush 4 drop 7 in coverage and just dare you to beat them.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 27, 2012 1:02 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Not really
Rat isn’t big enough to occupy 2 blockers for the whole duration of the play
There is a difference between being a wide body NT that needs two players to root out in order for the offense to rush inside the tackles, and a NT that can rush the passer. Those wide bodies don’t do a very good job of rushing the passer, and you only need to block him with a single player on passing downs.
The wide body NT is the kind of guy you sub for on passing downs. The most sacks in the NFL this year by a defensive tackle is 7.5 by Geno Atkins and Tommy Kelly. Your inside guys just don’t get sacks.
This is why the Gmen are having success
A 7 loss team that gave up 40+ points/game over a 3 game stretch this year is not a success. They’ve gotten better of late, but this isn’t a great defensive team by any stretch.
Conn you have no clue. SMH. You seriously don't understand the 3-4.
Gemn are playing in their second superbowl in 4 years. How many playoff wins does Dallas have in the last 15 years.
You occupy the bottom of the list in football comprehension.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 6:05 AM CST up reply actions
actually
There is a difference between being a wide body NT that needs two players to root out in order for the offense to rush inside the tackles, and a NT that can rush the passer.
I would say you are the one with comprehension issues…..
Here’s a theoretical play from 2010: Snap. Tony takes 7 step drop. Tony looks left at Miles, who is doubled, and looks right to where Roy Williams should be…but instead sees Colombo on his back and a Defensive End foaming at the mouth jumping over Marc’s carcass. Tony proceeds to run like hell and look for Witten
-by CotySaxman on Jul 11, 2011 7:50 AM PDT
Now, if somebody doesn’t agree with that, that’s cool. I also don’t agree with the fact that I don’t have $10 million in my bank account. But the fact that I don’t agree with it doesn’t make it any less true.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 AM PST
by I am Ironman!!! on Jan 28, 2012 8:29 AM CST up reply actions
You can join Conn in the missing something department.
A big wide body will help with the ilb blitzes. Something this team can’t do with Rat in the middle. Tell me how effective ilb blitzes in Dallas are. The ilb’s in Dallas get stonewalled when going up the middle. Go ahead and deny this too Iron. The 3-4 is based on blitzes and trickery. What good does it do to blitz up the middle when it never works ? Huh ? It takes away from your blitz package.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 9:34 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't dis agree with you there
However that has nothing to to with the Argument….
The Arguement is that a Wide Body is better than a smaller NT at rushing the Passer.
you cannot deny that a “Wide body” would be less effective as a pass rusher on an individual level….
as for the “taking up Blockers” I bet that Ratliff does a pretty good job of that. the key is, as with all blitzes, is timing. Show to Early and the Line adjusts, come to late and the QB can get rid of the ball before you get there….
Here’s a theoretical play from 2010: Snap. Tony takes 7 step drop. Tony looks left at Miles, who is doubled, and looks right to where Roy Williams should be…but instead sees Colombo on his back and a Defensive End foaming at the mouth jumping over Marc’s carcass. Tony proceeds to run like hell and look for Witten
-by CotySaxman on Jul 11, 2011 7:50 AM PDT
Now, if somebody doesn’t agree with that, that’s cool. I also don’t agree with the fact that I don’t have $10 million in my bank account. But the fact that I don’t agree with it doesn’t make it any less true.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 AM PST
by I am Ironman!!! on Jan 28, 2012 10:48 AM CST up reply actions
Rat had 2 sacks last season
Awsome.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 12:38 PM CST up reply actions
Y'all are talkin' so 20th century
Widebody this, nobody that, push/blitz, bah. Coupled with “had 2 sacks” numerology and quasi-derogatory “comprehension” irrelevancies and slightings to boot.
You occupy the bottom of the list in football comprehension.
btw, that’s my seat… – has a great ground-up view of the quibbling.
That's one small step...
funny
btw, that’s my seat… – has a great ground-up view of the quibbling.
I like that one.
You need to work on your logic
You seriously don’t understand the 3-4. Gemn are playing in their second superbowl in 4 years. How many playoff wins does Dallas have in the last 15 years.
What does me understanding the 3-4 have anything to do with the G-man playing in their second superbowl in 5 seasons or how many playoffs wins the Cowboys have in 15 years? You would think with a name like “football mensa” you would support your conclusions with some “analysis.”
Do you know what a non sequitur is? Look it up, because your post was a classic example of once.
Nothing that's why it was two different sentences.
What does me understanding the 3-4 have anything to do with the G-man playing in their second superbowl
Since you don’t understand the signifigance of what a good widebody nt can do for a 3-4 d then carry on with the Rat train. Destination > town Nowhere.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 5:16 PM CST up reply actions
Cannot put together a cogent analysis, can you?
We are talking about the wide body NT and you are talking about the Giants? I thought the Giants play a 4-3? As such, with is a wide body NT relevant to the Giants? Don’t answer that question — you might get a brain cramp.
A good widebody NT makes a difference in the running game. Widebody NTs don’t rush nor do they eat up rushers in a passing game. They eat up rushers in the running game. BTW — the Cowboys don’t have much of a problem with the running game (at least compared to the passing game).
Thanks for playing!!!
Jammal Williams
6’3" 348 lbs. He was the reason the Chrgers d was so goodd when Wade was there. He absolutely commanded a double and sometime triple team and allowed the other players to get the sacks. He moved the pocket backwards.
Your analysis has a hole in it.
Next !!
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 29, 2012 9:55 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
First, a single data point doesn't make an analysis
Second, your memory is playing tricks with you. Jamal Williams played 13 years in the league (and apparently retired after the 2010 season).
His best sack total was 4.0 for a year, his second best total was 2.5, and he had a total of 13 sacks in his carreer. Doesn’t sound like a guy that commanded double/triple teams in the passing game to me.
by Conn Cowboy on Jan 29, 2012 12:25 PM CST up reply actions
I know full well how many sacks he had.
Again as usual you are missing the point. His pocket collapsing ability made it easier for the 3-4 to operate how it was designed.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 29, 2012 2:13 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Sorry -- the evidence doesn't support your hypothesis
If he was capable of collapsing the pocket, he was capable of getting sacks.
To the extent that the guy averaged 1 sack a year, I think the evidence shows that he wasn’t capable of getting to the passer.
BTW — you don’t double or triple team guys that cannot get to the passer.
Thanks for playing!!!
This is why....
I’m really hyped about picking up Calais or Mario if at all possible. Both have dream combos’ of speed and size/power. With Mario in particular, I don’t see why he can’t play with his hand on the ground at the 5 unless he’s just averse to mixing it up in the trenches. It’s another reason I’ve always kind of liked the idea of Rat at DE. Another guy with the same sort of physical combo. Poe at NT? Bring it on! Absorb as many blockers as possible, and we’ll see opposing QBs’ running for their lives! Too much to get blocked adequately.
by stargazer33 on Jan 27, 2012 1:06 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Actually I'd prefer Campbell over Mario, but it's just not going to happen.
Wish you were here and comfortably numb.
In passing situations they should be able to rush the QB.
They do have more responsibilty in stopping the run on 1st down and short to medium yardage plays because of only two deep LBs. There’s no reason why you couldn’t substitute quicker more mobile lineman on passing downs. The problem is we don’t have them. Ingram would be ideal for this because he can play anywhere, OLB, DE, wherever RR wants to put him. RR would salivate at the prospect of Ingram in his scheme.
Wish you were here and comfortably numb.
Remember the responsibility of the DEs and NT in the 3-4 is to tie up the OLmen and keep Ray Ray free to make the tackle.
Wish you were here and comfortably numb.
Quality DEs can get pressure on the qb
Just look at Justin Smith, Ryan Kerrigan and JJ Watt
In Romo we Trust
Kerrigan is the Redskins Spencer...he plays OLB
Good Luck to the 53. Stand with Honor, Play With Pride. Bring It Home
by TruBluToTheCore on Jan 27, 2012 3:40 PM CST up reply actions
I wish we had Kerrigan
I will give you Spencer and Martellus Bennett for Kerrigan, heck I will even throw in Kevin Ogletree and Alan Ball while we are at it
so this is the deal Daniel Snyder
we give
Anthony Spencer
Martellus Bennett
Kevin Ogletree
Alan Ball
we get
Ryan Kerrigan
Brandon Banks
thats a real good trade for you and the Redskins franchise Dan
"With the 14th pick in the 2012 NFL Draft.........The Dallas Cowboys select..............Melvin Ingram DE South Carolina"
My card has been sent in
by Archie Barberio on Jan 27, 2012 6:49 PM CST up reply actions
email him....he might take it...
i have a feeling they will try to sign laurent robinson away from us tho…they need some young promising WR’s in washington…
Good Luck to the 53. Stand with Honor, Play With Pride. Bring It Home
by TruBluToTheCore on Jan 28, 2012 12:20 AM CST up reply actions
Chia they would hang up the phone.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 9:39 AM CST up reply actions
Parcells and his Giants 3-4, which started this whole craze
Got a ton of sacks from ends – remember George Martin and Leonard Marshall??? I bet Danny White and Troy Aikman do!!
Agree with previous posters – The Cowboys can’t or won’t draft decent 3-4 ends.
I wouldnt say
They can’t and won’t draft good de. You gotta look at how coordinators like to scheme wade for example is a linebacker guy. He likes fast smart agile backers to do his dirty work. Left his averaged de and dt to just eat up blocks they where expected to stop the run not rush the passer. He had been successful to an extent. Now he may have found out that he really likes a pass rushing de in watt this year. Look at lebous scheme. He like to keep his olb around the same skill set around 10 or so sacks a season but he get good pressure with his safteys cornerbacks and ilb. However he likes space eating de pretty much have to double all three of his downlinemen. Capers is kinda the same he likes him a big fast nt and would rather rush his de than eat space. Now its all up to rob what he wants bit with the move of Coleman last year it left me wondering about his scheme. I know he likes to get open lanes for his stunts and twists and things of that nature. Although we do know he likes big nt and faster de. Maybe he needed a guy who knew the system in Coleman. I can only hope. But I have faith in him to straighten this mess of a line out and get him the talents and size he needs. Jj should listen to him and jg should also and we should be OK this year.
by Sado44 on Jan 27, 2012 3:11 PM CST via mobile reply actions
This is why I am beginning to prefer the 4-3 to the 3-4
It’s really really really hard to find 290lb+ guys that can rush the passer. When you do find them, they tend to get taken 2nd overall in the NFL draft (Hi Ndomukong Suh!)
So to run a 3-4 you need
1 – awesome nose tackle
1 – great defensive end
1 – pass rushing OLB
1 – all-around awesome at everything OLB (run, pass, and pass-rush)
How many of these players are there and how many teams actually have all 4? None?
That’s a lot to ask a GM to collect.
It’s a bit easier to find 2 pure pass-rushers (DEs) and 2 wide-bodies (DTs).
I think all the 3-4 tricks have been figured out by the great QBs in this league and that makes them vulnerable because for a 3-4 to man-up and beat a team, they need an almost impossible-to-assemble cast of star players.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Jan 27, 2012 5:10 PM CST reply actions
BED, hop on board
I have been saying the same things my dude
"With the 14th pick in the 2012 NFL Draft.........The Dallas Cowboys select..............Melvin Ingram DE South Carolina"
My card has been sent in
by Archie Barberio on Jan 27, 2012 6:47 PM CST up reply actions
I have really liked the 3-4 for a while
Centers are the weakest links on the O-line so beat up on them with a nose tackle. Keep the QB guessing where the pressure is coming from.
But it seems like this is the first year it became crystal clear that the best QBs can reliably beat the blitz. Tom Brady’s passer rating was over 10-points HIGHER when you blitzed him!
The only time it looked like the great QBs struggled is when you dropped 7 into coverage so they had to hold the ball which then enabled the pass rush to get home.
I’m really wanting the Cowboys to draft Melvin Ingram because he can play in any scheme. Keep the 3-4 this year, we don’t have enough true linebackers for a 4-3. But next year once we have two defensive ends (Ware and Ingram) along with 2 DTs (Spears and Ratliff) then find a way to add a couple linebackers to Sean Lee and let’s go back to a dominant 4-3.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Jan 27, 2012 7:01 PM CST up reply actions
the 4-3 logic is flawed.
the logic that more college teams run 4-3’s is true. but a bunch of those colleges run 250 LB guys who can’t be 4-3 DEs in the pro. those are the guys who become 3-4 OLB.
the problem isn’t the scheme. its the overall talent level
For God and country - Geronimo
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jan 27, 2012 7:23 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't know about that
The weak-side OLB is no different than a DE. They match up with the left tackle and play the line-of-scrimmage on 95% of downs.
So what you’re really talking about is the strong-side OLB. But while he might be less massive than he DE cousins he has to be a master of everything. He has to be excellent at run blocking, a great pass-rushing sack-master, and trusted in coverage.
So I don’t know, I’m beginning to question to economic advantages of a 3-4. In a world where there’s only a 20% of 3-4 teams, sure, you can pick up the big 350lb DT and the small 250lb DE that the 4-3 boys don’t want. But when the league is split half-and-half instead of 80/20 I’m beginning to question the economic efficiencies of drafting for the scheme.
by Blue Eyed Devil on Jan 27, 2012 7:46 PM CST up reply actions
the door swings both ways....
right now with the success of the 3-4 recently more teams have been moving towards it….they simply like having more athletes on the field in coverage or rushing…..of course people don’t take into account the reason Pitt and the couple of other teams that ran that defense were so successful was that they were only ones looking for the kind of player that their defense used….
Now with more teams going after the same players the talent level is watered down somewhat accoutning for the lack of elite talent and busts when trying to find them….
Good Luck to the 53. Stand with Honor, Play With Pride. Bring It Home
by TruBluToTheCore on Jan 28, 2012 12:24 AM CST up reply actions
I’m not sure I really buy it.
seems more like 3-4 teams are just shooting themselves in the foot more than anything else, eliminating slightly smaller guys that I suspect would be productive if they got a chance.
supposedly you need a 350 lb NT, but Ratliff has been great. Same thing with the defensive ends.
Look at Houston this year. Shaun Cody, Watt, Antonio Smith … not a single big space eater and they were lights out.
For God and country - Geronimo
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jan 28, 2012 4:36 PM CST up reply actions
They have a far superior linebacking core.
Watt is infinity better than any de we have.. Same for Antonio Smith.
Wade runs a different 3-4. Notice Rat had 2 sacks. RR run’s a truer 3-4.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 5:19 PM CST up reply actions
its the same reason why its hard to find a really athletic safety right now too...
the ed reeds in college are playing CB right now….you almost have to draft a CB to play FS for you to get the same effect anymore becuz the ed reeds, sean taylors, troy polamalus are not growing on trees….
Good Luck to the 53. Stand with Honor, Play With Pride. Bring It Home
by TruBluToTheCore on Jan 28, 2012 12:25 AM CST up reply actions
3-4 logic is even more flawed.
It depends on gimmicks and tricks. Just line up and beat your opponnent like the 4-3.
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
by football mensa on Jan 28, 2012 6:13 AM CST up reply actions
I am going to give this a rec
just for the good conversations I am reading that were brought to life by this article
good conversation starter
"With the 14th pick in the 2012 NFL Draft.........The Dallas Cowboys select..............Melvin Ingram DE South Carolina"
My card has been sent in
by Archie Barberio on Jan 27, 2012 6:47 PM CST reply actions
I’ll just say this. I’ve never seen a real football analyst explain the 3-4 that way (i,e. pass rush from one side … have you?). you might want to be cautious about accepting some of the things written on this site as fact.
caveat emptor.
For God and country - Geronimo
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jan 27, 2012 7:20 PM CST reply actions
Who do you like in the draft? Or who do you not like.
Just curious.
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 27, 2012 7:33 PM CST up reply actions
I think I only watched 2 college football games this year (the 2 Alabama / LSU games) so I have pretty limited opinions.
The one handed pick Clairborne had in the first game was special. I can see why he’s so highly rated. Upshaw looks like a stout OLB who was productive in college.
I’ll wait to see the results of the combine. If any of the pass rushers shows well I’d be happy to see that as a pick. for example, if Upshaw has a 38" vertical and 4.2 short shuttle, then I’d think he’d be a good pick. If Upshaw has a 32" vertical and a 4.5 short shuttle I’d be horrified if was the pick. I also know I can’t discern that from tape so I really don’t know how good Upshaw is (BTW, you can cross out Upshaw and put in Ingram or Coples above).
basically, pass well, stop the pass. anything that helps that. I wouldn’t be crazy about a 350 lb NT that can’t rush the passer for example.
In the highlights, Janoris Jenkins looks like a freakish talent. he’s the one guy where he just jumps off the tape (kinda like Von Miller last year). I don’t think me watching tape is worth anything though.
For God and country - Geronimo
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jan 28, 2012 7:17 AM CST up reply actions
basically, pass well, stop the pass. anything that helps that. I wouldn’t be crazy about a 350 lb NT that can’t rush the passer for example.
+100
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 28, 2012 7:31 AM CST up reply actions
it’s been nice to see the things I’ve been advocating go mainstream..
from ESPN…
The NFL is not about running the ball and stopping the run anymore. Those are tired clichés. It’s protecting the passer, especially up the middle, and rushing the passer….
Let’s look at a team that lost last week: Houston. The Texans drafted J.J. Watt and Brooks Read, and Wade Phillips’ defense attacked the passer. Too often we have used the excuse that defensive ends in a 3-4 are just space eaters. Smith proves that wrong. So does Watt. They can be disruptive.
For God and country - Geronimo
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Jan 28, 2012 10:40 AM CST up reply actions
The Cowboys need a DE as much as any team in the league
If the Cowboys had a real defensive end they could “cover up” Spencer.
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 27, 2012 7:35 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
for an example of the difference a good pocket collapsing DE can make...
look no further than the Packers defence this year…when they lost Cullen Jenkins to FA and were unable to replace his production and pressure, their pass rush effectiveness dropped effectively…..
I think if you were to watch the majority of our games it is the failure of the center of our defense to collapse the pocket and not our OLB’s that are the problem. They are squeezing the pocket just fine from the outside, however the QB’s are too often allowed to move up in the pocket to avoid the outside pressure……if you add a reliable, consistent, DE that can generate pressure from the interior then the pass rush would be made that much more effective….
Good Luck to the 53. Stand with Honor, Play With Pride. Bring It Home
by TruBluToTheCore on Jan 28, 2012 12:30 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
for an example of the difference a good pocket collapsing DE can make...
exhibit 2 a. JJ Watt…………………Dallas wiill never have a guy like that because they can’t draft guys like that….
Tru you make a great point
Jerry is the end all in Dallas.
I think there is a guy like that in this draft.
But if we can’t get him , one guy who could help us is Jason Jones.
by Jonathan Stern on Jan 28, 2012 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
Commenting before I read
They can rush the passer, but more often than not, if they can as a 3-4 end you are an Ndomukong Suh kind of force, a person that can rush up the middle as a DT and get around double digit sacks from there. There just stimply aren’t many players with the power AND finesse to be able to do that, although slightly more power based from what I’ve seen.
"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle, victorious." –Vince Lombardi
Normalcy Bias
That is what is wrong here I think more than anything.
The normalcy bias, or normality bias, refers to a mental state people enter when facing a disaster. It causes people to underestimate both the possibility of a disaster occurring and its possible effects. This often results in situations where people fail to adequately prepare for a disaster… …The assumption that is made in the case of the normalcy bias is that since a disaster never has occurred then it never will occur. It also results in the inability of people to cope with a disaster once it occurs. People with a normalcy bias have difficulties reacting to something they have not experienced before. People also tend to interpret warnings in the most optimistic way possible, seizing on any ambiguities to infer a less serious situation.
Or as applied here, we get so used to what certain players are good at and we don’t want to let them go because that is something we have become dependent on and what we are used to. Disaster has struck this team, and the organization is having trouble coping with it because of a normalcy developed toward the 3-4 and especially the 3-4 Ends and having them just be space eaters and unable to rush the passers. We have become scared that by changing this we may be become even less effective, and it always remains a possibility but we must realize our surroundings and how the league now loves to pass on first and second down now instead of trying to grind it out on the ground there. So you can never have enough pass rushers. Basically, you just need people that can get in the backfield. That has always been the most useful thing, but now more than ever. So time to get away from this sense of normalcy and start adapting to our surroundings
"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle, victorious." –Vince Lombardi
by ProBowlFactory on Jan 29, 2012 9:47 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
this is why I have basically stopped looking at the 300+ Lber's
in my “early Scouting” When I started looking into this years draft I was looking for guys in the 250-290 range Preferably those that played on the end.
Once the Combine is done I plan on going back, and showcasing a few of the Players I think Dallas should target….
Here’s a theoretical play from 2010: Snap. Tony takes 7 step drop. Tony looks left at Miles, who is doubled, and looks right to where Roy Williams should be…but instead sees Colombo on his back and a Defensive End foaming at the mouth jumping over Marc’s carcass. Tony proceeds to run like hell and look for Witten
-by CotySaxman on Jul 11, 2011 7:50 AM PDT
Now, if somebody doesn’t agree with that, that’s cool. I also don’t agree with the fact that I don’t have $10 million in my bank account. But the fact that I don’t agree with it doesn’t make it any less true.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 23, 2010 12:00 AM PST
by I am Ironman!!! on Jan 29, 2012 5:51 PM CST up reply actions

by 


























