Salary Restructuring...Have to Earn It!
Today's NFL players, to me, seem unmotivated to play every down of every game. What if they were paid at the end of the year based on their performances during the year? At the end of the season, the player that had the best year at each position should be paid the most money...only seems fair, doesn't it? And the second best should be paid the second most and so on. Of course if you make the post season, and win, you should also be compensated a little more into your salary along with the money the league gives you. Let me give you an example of my plan for QB's along with what some of them would have been paid last year.
Here is a formula that could be used...of course I just made it up and I'm sure you will all have your own tweaks.
Every QB on a team gets a "base" salary of $1,000,000.
Throw for 5,000 yds. $5,000,000
Throw for 4,000 yds. $4,000,000
Throw for 3000 yds. $3,000,000
Anything under 3,000 yds. and you get nothing more.
Completion %
70% $2,000,000
65% $1,500,000
60% $1,000,000
Anything under 60% and you get nothing more.
Int's
7 or less $2,000,000
8-12 $1,500,000
Throw more than 12 and you get nothing more.
Wins
14-16 $3,000,000
11-13 $2,000,000
8-10 $1,000,000
Anything less than 8 wins and you get nothing more.
Postseason
$500,000 per win.
Lose in the Postseason and you get nothing more.
Based of the above formula here is what 8 different QB's would have been paid for their 2011 efforts...
Brady $13,000,000
Rogers $11,500,000
Bree's $10,500,000
A. Smith $9,500,000
Romo $9,000,000
Manning $9,000,000
Stafford $8,000,000
Vick $5,000,000
As you can see, this could work because Brady, Rogers, and Bree's still come out on top based on everyone's top 3 in the league right now. I also put Vick in because he was paid about 13,000,000 last season and didn't earn it.
I think you could do something like this for each position. It would definitely give all the players incentive for having a good year and would also reward them if they did.
For injuries, there could be a clause to maybe pay the player his $1,000,000 base salary, plus a % of last years salary depending on what week of the season he is injured. Earlier the injury, bigger the percentage. Although said % not to exceed 70%.
So that's my idea to keep salaries structured properly and maybe see some better competition. You want your money? Make the old fashioned way...Earn It!
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Funny, interesting
But it’ll never happen.
by stegosaurus! on Feb 17, 2012 5:42 PM CST via mobile reply actions
You're right...it will never happen.
Salaries will continue to escalate and get out of hand and we as fans will not be able to go to games or buy merchandise. The rich keep getting richer while the middle class and poor struggle. Something needs to be done before it all comes crashing down.
"If you are prepared, you will be confident, and will do the job." Tom Landry
"The difference between extraordinary and ordinary, is that little extra". Jimmy Johnson
You dont want guys having alterior motives.
Just for example, using your formula, let’s say a quarterback is heading into a Week 17 game to decide the division. Let’s say he has 7 interceptions for the year, and a 70.3% completion percentage. You wouldnt be at all frightened that he might play overly conservative to protect his bonus money?
President of the David DeCastro fan club.
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Feb 18, 2012 6:06 AM CST reply actions
Well, I don't believe that they play at 110% now
and they are grossly overpaid. Like Vick, what does he care if he has a bad year? He’s laughing all the way to the bank. I’m sure that there would have to be adjustments and intangibles to be considered, but something has to be done before this all gets out of hand.
"If you are prepared, you will be confident, and will do the job." Tom Landry
"The difference between extraordinary and ordinary, is that little extra". Jimmy Johnson

by 





















