| Sign Up | Google+

Crowd Sourced: Which way does causality flow, pass rush or secondary

I'm tired of the fact free discussions about pass rush/secondary causality. Does a weak pass rush cause a bad secondary or does a weak secondary cause a bad pass rush.

So let's put together some facts. Let's look at:

Teams that added/lost an elite CB

-change in sacks for the team that added the CB

-change in sacks for the team that lost the CB

Obviously this will be imperfect but at least its a start at looking at the relevant data.

I'll do Deion Sanders.

1993 Atlanta Falcons (w/ Deion Sanders): 26 sacks

1994 Atlanta Falcons (w/o Deion Sanders): 32 sacks

1993 SF 49ers (w/o Deion Sanders): 44 sacks

1994 SF 49ers (w/ Deion Sanders): 38 sacks

1994 Dallas Cowboys (w/o Deion Sanders): 47 sacks

1995 Dallas Cowboys (w/ Deion Sanders): 35 sacks

Please think of other examples (e.g. Charles Woodson, Champ Bailey, etc) and post your results in the comments.

the pro football reference 'teams' page is invaluable for this exercise.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/

                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Recent FanPosts

View All Fan Posts

The Next FanPosts

There are 42 Comments. Load Now. Loading

Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.

C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read

R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next

Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read

Comment Settings

Live comment alert: Hide it!

Comments for this post are closed.

tracking_pixel_5341_tracker tracking_pixel_5351_tracker