Sturm's take, and I happen to strongly agree with almost every word, is that he would not take Brockers and Wagner over Claiborne, but WOULD have taken DDC and Worthy or Cox (via a short tradeup to 12) and Konz INSTEAD of Claiborne. Am I happy we have Claiborne? Yes. Am I also unhappy that we are not building up our weakest spots (OL and DL) by early draft picks? Yes again. I know the Claiborne love is almost off the charts around here, and I'll probably be told by the majority to either shut up or get over it, but it is fascinating to consider the alternatives Dallas had. We could have been building from the inside out, but instead are doing the opposite. I hope like hell that it works and Tony doesn't pay dearly for it.
There are 20 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.