The article, however, did get me thinking. It's a question every team faces sooner or later and the Cowboys are no exception. The most important guy on the team is getting older . . . when should the team take a different direction? Or better yet, when does the team think Romo will produce less than the next best obtainable alternative?
To the chagrin of many on here, I've already mentioned that the Cowboys are rebuilding. Yes, that's FULL rebuild mode - stemming from the fact that they are changing philosophies and scheme for the entire defense, will probably get a new ST coach and the only remaining starting players on the roster from 3 years ago (that are projected to come back) this year is: Romo, Ware, Witten, Ratliff, Spencer, Spears, Free, Smith, Lee, Sensabaugh and Church (speculation continues about the futures of Spencer, Spears and Free). With a rebuild comes change. Some of you don't agree and think that the Romo has another 3-5 years in him. Perhaps he does.
This off-season, the Cowboys will need to answer that question. Romo's contract is such that it needs to be reworked and for him to get the same (or more) money, he'll probably need to be extended. The question is, of course, for how long? Romo turns 33 in April.
When should the Cowboys' Front Office move on from Tony Romo?
Immediately. Turn it over to Orton until a new alternative can be found via the draft this year or the next (10 votes)
Immediately. Trade for Matt Flynn, Alex Smith or some other proven QB (7 votes)
In 3-5 years. Resign Romo to something that makes sense, draft the best prospect in 2-3 years and develop (93 votes)
Whenever Romo says he wants to retire, find his replacement via either FA or the draft (2 votes)
112 total votes