Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Leandro Damiao Is Still Really Good

Parcells press conference 9/11/06

Parcells was either trying to protect his offensive line, or I just graded them harsher and didn't consider the level of the Jags defensive line in my evaluations. When asked about the line play, he said they played OK, fair, not an inordinate amount of pressure. But he always qualified it with how good the Jags line was. I think he was being kind, but I could be wrong.

Left a lot of yards on the field, 100 yds from penalties, that translates to 7 points. That's disappointing and we lost the turnover battle. Probably should've played more conservatively there, maybe not take a chance at the end of the first half. Those are the things I 2nd guess.

Bledsoe? We can't afford turnovers in our end. Those kinds of things are the difference between winning and losing. He didn't get an inordinate amount of pressure, relative to how good the Jax pass rush can be, but he was pressed a few times.

Jamaica Rector has a slight ankle sprain.

No thought of playing Tony Romo, not a legitimate questions at this point.

2nd INT wasn't just Drew, the throw was into the sidleines and that brings the corner into play, but he needs to see that. But other players should've cleared that zone out.

Not thinking about Romo right now, just trying to fix mistakes on the team. Several positions didn't play well, not just QB. I'm trying to correct those mistakes.

Bledsoe executed early, but series 3,4 and 5 we missed some throws. Bledsoe had some help in that regard (mistakes), I'm not singling them out.

Have to see how Vandy is this week. Suisham kicked off well but missed the FG and was bad on the onside kick. Jax were 10 yards behind the average starting position on kickoffs, so that was good. I haven't seen enough of Vandy to play him Sunday. Maybe that will change this week.

There's a chance I would bring two kickers on Sunday, but I don't want to.

Terrell was pretty good. Not going to get into who did what, but overall he was pretty good.

We stopped ourselves on offense. We moved the ball well in the 3rd quarter. TD called back, 25 yard gain negated, motion penalty pushed us back.

Disappointed we couldn't hold them to FG's. Bad plays near the end of the first half. The big turning point was them getting the TD at the half. Tied it up 10-10. We tried to respond in the 3rd quarter, that was our best running series in the game.

Size of the WR's was little bit of a factor, but we didn't cover well.

I thought I had seen enough from Flozell last week. I'm hoping things get better, certainly it needs to get better. I have to see improvement from Flozell this week. I don't think it was conditioning.

McBriar had one of the great punts you'll see in football, 66 yards net that doesn't roll. That was a pretty good play for us. That is a plus for us. But he missed inside the 20, and our gunner missed the assignment.

Watkins did OK, for his first time, only one mental error, 5 to 6 tackles. Played him too much on special teams and defense. We didn't use him full time of defense, but the combination was too much, but I'm pretty happy.

The weather wasn't a factor.

Veterans made mistakes and that is disappointing. Veteran players should be mopre consistent. But they made misjudegements too, but you try to keep it down. That (last week) is over now, I just finished with the special teams trying to fix their problems.

That drive in the 3rd quarter was a good drive. Thought the call on Witten was OK. I thought the officials were OK. I made a bad judgement on the red flag. I thought the clock was still running under 5 minutes, when it was supposed to stop. That was my mistake.

Changing QB's shouldn't be a consideration. Bledsoe's starting next Sunday. I was getting Romo ready to play in the preseason and I hope to play him sometime this year. I don't know when or where, or under what circumstances. The time for Romo is not now.

I think Bledsoe will react to yesterday well, but there's a lot (of blame) to go around today.

Colombo? (long pause) Not bad, some mistakes here and there, but overall I was OK.

Overall the line, considering what they were up against, played fair. There are a position or two that need to get better. The runners didn't trust the play long enough and cut too quick on some plays. They need to wait for the OL to get off one block and on to another.

We got beat on a number of things not just jump balls by the Jax WR's. Beat outside and inside.

We didn't get an inordinate amount of pressure. We got pushed back in the pocket on a couple of plays, Bledsoe got flushed out of the pockert when Glenn was wide open.

Watkins got hit on the elbow so we brought Davis in for a little bit.

There will be some different actives vs. inactives this week. Probably 2 or 3 spots.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The gameplan...
Scout.com says we had a plan, it just didn't work...

http://cowboys.scout.com/2/567043.html

"The offensive gameplan, we were told, could be boiled down into two steps:

Step 1: Use a controlled passing game to set up the run.

Step 2: When it was time to run, hit Jax where it hurts: right in its defensive midsection."

It worked on the first drive. And I must admit, if we had racked up, like, 150 yards rushing on Jax's D and beat them soundly, I'd be on travelocity.com right now trying to book a flight to Miami. So I'm not quarreling about the strategy.

Guess my only problem is: why go away from something if the other team can't stop it?

In basketball, if the other team can't stop the pick-and-roll, you run it 'til they stop it. You run it to death. Run it every play if you have to.

That's what Jax did. They started working on Henry and didn't stop. They went to Matt Jones four times on one drive. They saw weakness and dared us to stop it.

We know they couldn't cover our receivers, particularly Owens. We were killing 'em with the short controlled passing plays and even got behind them several times on deep ones. Why not go into shotgun or the two minute offense? No-huddle? Tire their guys out. Run 'em to death cause we got the horses to do it.

Just an observation. I'm certainly not a hall of fame coach but it just seems like we played into their hands yesterday. We wanna dictate the game to our opponents, not the other way around.

by Tuna Helper on Sep 11, 2006 3:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Tuna Helper
You are correct sir! We should have stuck with what was working, namely TO was consistantly beating Mathis, we should have kept that up.
Our O-line played decently considering the opponent has one of the toughest front 4. You are going to get beat once in a while, and you won't have a clean pocket the majority of the time.
Bledsoe was not right, he should have been pulled due to injury, and Romo should have been brought in for relief.
On JAX side, they picked on Henry, and didn't let up and thats why we couldn't stop them, we made no adjustment on defense.
It's one game, let's learn from the mistakes and move on.

by APerfectStar on Sep 11, 2006 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tuna misdirection
Grizz, I think your analysis of the o-line performance is probably right on the money, and, as you suggest, Parcells is protecting what he considers psyches more fragile than Bledsoe's, like Columbo specifically.  He's probably allowing Bledsoe to shoulder more of the blame than he deserves because he knows Drew won't pay any attention to the criticism.

The question I wish somebody would have asked is whether or not Parcells trusts Bledsoe to remove himself from a game when some injury (like the stiff back) is hampering his motion or accuracy.  Wouldn't it only be natural for Bledsoe to remember Tom Brady and be more reluctant to come out?

All that being said, I think yesterday was Bledsoe's worst game as a Cowboy.  He'll have to play much better for us to win.  Dallas also revealed problems on the o-line and secondary that Washington and following opponents will exploit every week until they're addressed. --Amos

by AmosM on Sep 11, 2006 3:10 PM CDT reply actions  

Yup
Grizz, I think your analysis of the o-line performance is probably right on the money, and, as you suggest, Parcells is protecting what he considers psyches more fragile than Bledsoe's, like Columbo specifically.  He's probably allowing Bledsoe to shoulder more of the blame than he deserves because he knows Drew won't pay any attention to the criticism.

That is exactly what I thought as I listened to the press conference. Bledsoe is a veteran, he's heard all this before, Parcells knew the criticism wouldn't bother him, and he didn't want to blast his o-line.

If you're reading this, you could be commenting, too. Sign up for a free account on Blogging The Boys.

by Dave Halprin on Sep 11, 2006 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

More misdirection
The other thing that I occurred to me as I listened to the press conference was that this has to be the biggest evasion on the question of playing a back-up. He never said what he and others ALWAYS say - "Drew is our quarterback. End of discussion." Makes you wonder...

by dunkman on Sep 11, 2006 3:14 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree with Bill
the O line didn't play that bad as Jones ran for decent yardage and Bledsoe, for the most part, had time to throw, considering Jax D is one of the best in the league. We won't run against a much better defense all year.

I blame Bledsoe for not making the throws. Even when mistakes are made by a team, good qb's have to step up and find a way to win and make plays. Bledsoe didn't.

"They're going to leave me over here by myself and thats when I'm gonna sink my fangs into them." - Terry Glenn

by Terry on Sep 11, 2006 3:36 PM CDT reply actions  

Terry Glenn's INT
Terry Glenn has to take some 'credit' for Bledsoe's second INT. Certainly Bledsoe should've recognized the zone trap defense, and clearly didn't see the DB sagging off Terry Glenn. But check out the replay - WHY was the DB sagging off Terry Glenn so much? Because Terry ran an absolutely TERRIBLE decoy route. He should've fired off the ball and then hooked hard back to the ball - the hook back to the ball is CRITICAL - the intention there is that the DB moves UP to defend the hook. Instead, watch the replay - Terry semi-trots off the line and then just kinda lingers off towards the sidelines. He didn't sell any kind of route, so clearly the DB had no interest in jumping his route or covering him very closely in the zone.

I love T. Glenn, but this was one time when he dogged on the play.

Ol Hickory

by ol hickory on Sep 11, 2006 7:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario
Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush
Small
Is Mario Williams on the Cowboys' radar?
Fountain_small
The Stanford Routt Situation

Recent FanPosts

Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Is Doug Free Overpaid?
Small
It's Rabble's Fault
Small
Do what Philly did in 2011, only better
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Hindsight Games Part 1: J.J. Watt
Small
How The Giants GM Would Fix The Cowboys Overnight ... Good Read Jerrah!!!!
Zzzzwww_small
Twitter GM Mock
Small
2012 FA and 1st Round Projection
Cb1_small
Is the long term answer to the Cowboys NT already on the team?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui