Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

North Dallas Forty

While channel surfing on TV recently, I came across the movie North Dallas Forty. How appropriate. Shortly after the Seahawks game, North Dallas Forty came to mind and I was reminded how life sometimes imitates art. For those of you not familiar with the book/movie, it was written by Peter Gent who was a WR for the Cowboys in the late 60's. The book, and the movie that was based on it, caused quite a sensation as they revealed the dirty under-belly of the NFL. Sex, drugs (illegal and prescribed) and the way the league and the teams use up players and spit them out were some of the major themes. The head coach was straight out of Tom Landry central casting, QB Seth Maxwell had more than a passing resemblance to Don Meredith, and WR Phil Elliot was obviously Peter Gent, as he battled to fit his rebellious and independent spirit into the heavily regimented North Dallas Bulls football team. The book's ending is dark, complete with murders and loss. The movie's ending wasn't as grim on the life-level, but it was a disaster for the fictional Dallas Cowboys, the North Dallas Bulls, in the final game of the season. It is here where life imitated art.

The setting is a game against the Chicago Marauders, and North Dallas has to win or the season is over. Late in the game, North Dallas is driving for a TD to tie it up; they need seven points to extend the season and are running out of time. On the last play of the game, they score a TD and all they need is the extra point for a tie. Enter backup QB Art Hartman, the goody-goody young replacement for the aging Seth Maxwell/Don Meredith character. Hartman resembled in some respects a young Roger Staubach, and his job is to be the holder on extra-points. On a wet field on the road, North Dallas attempts the extra-point, but Hartman bobbles the snap, the kick is never made, and they lose the game and the season is over. After the game, there's a shot of Hartman slumped against his locker in tears.

Of course the parallels aren't perfect, but the outcome is eerily similar. Instead of the young backup QB holding the ball for and extra-point, we had a young backup QB who had been elevated to the starting position holding the ball on a FG attempt. Both snaps were bobbled, and both mistakes cost the team its final shot at victory. Both situations involved an inconsolable QB sobbing in the locker room after the game.

Just for extra emphasis, guess what number the fictional QB Art Hartman wore in the movie? If you said #9, you have been paying attention.

BTW, if you haven't seen the movie or read the book, I highly recommend it, especially for Dallas Cowboys fans. You'll easily recognize the similarity to the Cowboys of the late 60's/early 70's. The book is a riot to read and the movie is one of the best football movies of all time. The dialogue, the acting and the way it captures the inner-workings of a football team are well worth it.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Grizz, some of these scenes in the movie
are reminiscent of a party given by some old fraternity bothers at the Four Seasons apts in Dallas in 1963-64.
Don Meredith, Billy Lotheridge, Mike Gaechter, and Dave Edwards were in attendance.
I don't recall folks getting thrown in the pool,nor bloodied knuckles to impress a groupy,
but Billy Lotheridge got into a fight with one of the hosts over a rather tipsy Braniff Hostess.
You could cut the testosterone with a Bowie knife.
Wharter

by Wharter on Jan 11, 2007 4:21 PM CST reply actions  

Questions about the film & Landry
I saw the film a few years ago and was most surprised with its portrayal of Landry. I was born in '78, so everything I've ever heard about Landry is tinged with weepy nostalgia and melodrama. The film, as I recall, depicts the Landry character as kind of a dick, rather than the model Christian man he is remembered as.

Is this portrayal accurate, do you think? Was there a backlash in Cowboys nation for this back then?

by jsdoty on Jan 11, 2007 5:25 PM CST reply actions  

There was a lot of comment on the supposed
portrayals of certain Cowboys. The Landry character in the book/film is sort of a caricature; it exaggerates his reliance on the computer and the cold, clinical nature of his coaching style. Remember, it's only fiction, and Gent was just the kind of non-conformist rebel that would clash with Landry's no-nonsense style. So you can expect their relationship was tense, and Gent worked that side as one of the themes of the book.

I think the most important thing to remember is that the book was art, not a true-to-life biography or an accurate re-telling of anything in particular. The characters were created on people he knew but they were exaggerated to make the story more exciting.

If you're reading this, you could be commenting, too. Sign up for a free account on Blogging The Boys.

by Dave Halprin on Jan 11, 2007 5:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Interesting
Thanks Grizz.

by jsdoty on Jan 11, 2007 6:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Pete Gent was kind of a no-talent,,
ne-er-do-well as a Cowboy. He only wished that he had the hands of his alter ego character in the book.
Gent couldn't carry Tom Landry's jock strap.
Wharter

by Wharter on Jan 11, 2007 5:35 PM CST reply actions  

Right on about Gent
He NEVER had hands like that- in his wildest dreams he was half that good. Landry was indeed a cold man on the surface; you had to get to know him before you could see that that was his way of handling the hard life that was being the HC.
Gent is exaclty the kind of player that Landry would have had little patience with; not that much talent and a troublemaker. BYe BYE.
Gent took out his disapointment on Landry and the Boys. It is interesting to note that the book was soon forgotten and the movie as well. I actually think that it is more descriptive of the CURRENT NFL then of the 60s.

by burmafrd1944 on Jan 11, 2007 8:06 PM CST reply actions  

In truth, the book was a best seller
and the movie consistently shows up in Top 10 lists of the best football movies ever made. Nick Nolte's performance is routinely praised even today.

But I understand some Dallas fans felt it was a betrayal, that he stabbed the team in the back. But I never took stuff like that seriously so it doesn't bother me. Just because it was based on the Cowboys doesn't take away how good both the book and movie were and are.

If you're reading this, you could be commenting, too. Sign up for a free account on Blogging The Boys.

by Dave Halprin on Jan 11, 2007 9:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush
Small
Is Mario Williams on the Cowboys' radar?
Fountain_small
The Stanford Routt Situation
Zombie_cap3_small
Two Options for how to fill the Cowboys roster holes

Recent FanPosts

97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario
Small
2012 FA and 1st Round Projection
Cb1_small
Is the long term answer to the Cowboys NT already on the team?
Small
The Cowboys should sign Routt and franchise Spencer
Small
Hail Mary or a 5 Year Plan?
Massage_home_small
Forward Thinking Vol IV - The Offseason
Small
If the glorious leader were a visionary instead of a consensus taker

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui