Sticking to the script
Teams that script their first 15 plays on offense have always been a curiosity to me. Sometimes I imagine an offensive coordinator holding the script in his hand and play #6 comes up which is a deep "go" route designed to get the best WR on the team deep behind the coverage for a big play, or at least to let the defense know that the deep ball is an option during the game. But what happens if by play #6 your offense is at the opponent’s 5-yard line? OK, that’s an extreme example meant to prove a point.
Todd Archer, in today’s DMN, examines Jason Garrett’s use of the script for the Cowboys. Thankfully for my piece of mind, Garrett uses the script as a guide but does take down and distance into consideration while calling plays on those first drives of the games.
"Some people really stick to the script, adhere to the script regardless of the situation," Garrett said. "We allow situations to take us where we want to go. If we get in certain third-down or red-zone situations, we're not going to blindly run plays. We're going to let the situations take over."
The article is a good read and I recommend you check it out. The basic idea is that Garrett is doing what we’ve been saying all year and that is getting a feel for certain formations and packages on offense and how they might work throughout the game. It’s also setting up plays for later by showing one thing out of a certain formation then doing another later in the game.

I posted my minor rant about Lions’ WR Mike Furrey in the previous post and how I want the Cowboys to make him pay for his antics at Texas Stadium last year. I was then going to move on to Jon Kitna and his post-game interview that slagged the Cowboys defense. Not that is wasn’t deserved after the way the Cowboys defense played in that game, but still, saying certain things in the way he did is definitely going to be bulletin-board material in the future. I should have known that you guys would beat me to the punch and you did, BTB-regular gaz0425 posted one of the offending comments.
"That No. 56 looked like he didn't know where he was about half the time," said Detroit quarterback Jon Kitna, the week after the Lions lit up the Cowboys' defense in the regular-season finale.
Bradie James is the #56 in question and he knows about the quote and has answered about it in a few interviews. On Sunday, he’ll get the chance for some retribution. Look, it’s true that James wasn’t the best in coverage last year due to his increased bulk and the Cowboys insistence on keeping him on the field for passing situations. This year, James is a different player and only plays in some of the pass coverage schemes. But he does get to blitz more often and this week he’ll probably be lobbying for a few extra blitzes in an effort to show that #56 can take care of business on the defensive side of the ball.
But I didn’t remember another comment Kitna made concerning Terence Newman. The DMN blog recalls:
"We definitely felt like Terence Newman was the best corner that they had, so we knew we needed to be careful with him. But even with him, I mean, he's not Marcus Trufant in my opinion. He doesn't have that kind of ability. It wasn't like you were scared to throw at him, I guess."
T-New now has a streak of three straight games with an INT. Care to make it four?

The DFW S-T takes a look at the good and bad with Cowboys secondary.

Over at SI.com, Peter King gives out some Romo-love.
Tony Romo, QB, Dallas. In the six Cowboys games since the loss to New England, Romo has six 100-plus rating games, has completed 73 percent of his throws and has 18 touchdowns and five interceptions.
[snip]
I think the only quarterbacks, long-term, I'd take over Romo right now are Brady and Peyton Manning. Romo doesn't have the deep arm of Carson Palmer or Roethlisberger, but he has the improvisational ability equal to, or better than, anyone beyond the top two.
0 recs |
13 comments
Comments
Grizz, I'm fired up!
Give me some pads and a helmet, I want to put some licks on Furrey and Kitna myself. It's unbelievable to me that Kitna talked like that after winning their 2nd game of the year vs. a playoff team. Maybe he had too much bottled up to let it rest after losing all those games, but I thought he was smarter than that.
To paraphrase Jason Ferguson, he won't be talking much on Sunday (except to the trainers).
by grapejoos on
Dec 3, 2007 11:28 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
hehe
Remember when Kitna boldly said the Lions would win 10 games this season? Well, losing this one would put the Lions at 6-7, with no chance of hitting double-digit wins.
Let's shut their mouths and shatter their dreams at the same time.
by Nelson on
Dec 3, 2007 11:49 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
More fodder
This is James on what Kitna said last year:
"He singled me out," said James, knowing after a game that's sort of an unspoken no-no in the league.
So were you mad?
"Of course it pissed me off," James said. "I don't know him. I don't want to know him. But he's going to know me."
DC.com is all over this bulletin board material. I'm fired up for what should be a blowout but in a season like this, I want to see all the games I can.
by Billito on
Dec 3, 2007 9:15 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe The 'Boys will take out some past-season
frustrations on hapless Deee-troit.
But, according to DMN football wizard, Rick Gosselin,
the Lions will get the pick because they are "the home team".
He also ranks Dallas #3, behind the Packers, in NFL standings.
What a plick!
by Wharter on
Dec 3, 2007 12:12 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
What a joke
Behind the Packers? That would be like ranking us ahead of the Patriots the week after they shelled us. I realize the final score with GB was closer, but the games played out similarly - GB has no hope of stopping our offense when it's rolling. They just don't have the personnel, and I think that would be true even with Woodson and KGB in there.
I suspect we'll get another chance to see how they stack up against us at home in the playoffs. But ranking them ahead of Dallas after that game is unconscionable...and as many noticed, it probably would have been a bigger blowout if Favre were in there the whole game.
by grapejoos on
Dec 3, 2007 1:58 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And if TO had caught that last TD pass
butterfingers
by scottmaui on
Dec 3, 2007 5:44 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I got news for Burger King
Romo's improvisational skills are much better than any QB in the game, including Brady and Manning. When the play breaks down and pocket collapses, Brady and Manning become very average and ordinary QBs, mainly because they can't run any faster than most people's grandmothers.
Under those same circumstances, thats when Romo excels and makes big plays and is at his best, not to mention Romo is pretty good from within a clean pocket.
Obviously I'd take Romo over any QB playing today, including Brady and Manning for those reasons.
by Terry on
Dec 3, 2007 12:49 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Brady has been playing in the league for six year
and Romo is just a notch below Brady in terms of production. 3 years from now Romo could be the best qb to ever play the game, considering this is his first full season as a starter and he is already putting up numbers only a few have done before him.
by Burt D on
Dec 3, 2007 1:40 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Can't argue with anything you say here, Burt
Brady's been more productive so far this year, and certainly has more experience (not to mention SB rings)...
But I'd STILL take Romo over Brady -- now. He rivals Brady and Manning's accuracy and poise, and is FAR BETTER than both in the face of pressure. Manning wilts and Brady's game starts to fall apart under pressure. Romo seems to excel.
Romo hasn't been crowned yet, but you can certainly make the case that he is equal to or better than his competition.
by DalaiLuke on
Dec 3, 2007 2:41 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
when Romo gets his rings, and he will
there will be no comparisons, Romo will be the absolute best.
by Terry on
Dec 3, 2007 3:54 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Earlier in the season, I mentioned that I thought
Romo would be as good or better that Aikman.
I got ripped for it on this board.
I'll stick to my guns and say that Tony will make all-pro; maybe mvp by next year.
by Wharter on
Dec 3, 2007 4:36 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I have your back wharter
by Terry on
Dec 3, 2007 8:49 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
scripting plays
interesting article indeed. I don't have the insight to know exactly what they're doing at the time, but I always got the feeling that has something to do with being so dominant in the second half. Part of the play calling has to do with wearing out defense and controlling the game once they have a lead. But I always get the sense that the first couple drives they are feeling out the defense, looking at their coverage, seeing how they respond to certain formations, and also intentionally running certain plays that will set up later plays. I love this kind of chess-match aspect to the game.
by scottmaui on
Dec 3, 2007 5:49 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
















