Cowboys excel in all three phases of the game
There were so many stories from last night’s game that it’s hard to cover them all. We could just lump them all together by saying the Cowboys offense, defense and special teams all came together to spank the Bears. Mickey Spags covers it all in this article. But let’s look at things with a little more detail.
Where to begin? How about the man, the myth, the legend, Tony Romo? He’s getting love from everywhere this morning and this constant refrain is heard: Time to pay the man, Jerry. Don’t worry, Jerry will get it done. The thing that most impressed me about Romo last night was his sixth-sense in the pocket. Play after play it looked like something really bad was going to happen but Romo either got the pass away just in time or gave a shake-and-bake to the pass rush and continued on with the play. It was masterful. Here’s a Lenny P. article about the game where he describes the same thing.
But it was Romo's show. Perhaps most impressive was how he used his feet to elude an often-fierce Bears' pass rush, to buy time and to permit his receivers an opportunity to uncover. By unofficial count, nearly two-thirds of Romo's passing yards in the second half came on plays in which he moved deftly around the pocket to bob and weave away from Chicago defenders.
Amen. A Chicago paper put it this way:
Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo looked like a more mobile Tom Brady, sidestepping the intense pressure of the Bears' front line to make play after play.
Have we gone from Favre to Brady in describing Romo? He sure is being heaped in with some heady company this year.
Let’s get the sober, logical analysis from Nick Eatman.
It's one thing to light up the Giants with five touchdowns on opening night or pick apart the Dolphins last week.
But for the kid from Eastern Illinois University to come into Soldier Field, against arguably the NFL's toughest defense of the last few years and pass for 329 yards and two touchdowns is a different story.
Romo might not have felt he made some kind of statement, but his coach doesn't exactly agree.
"I think he made a statement, for sure, that Tony can compete against the top defenses in the league," head coach Wade Phillips said. "That was a question coming in, and I think he made a statement there. I think Tony is an outstanding quarterback. The decisions and he makes plays that a lot of other guys can't make."

OK, so Tony Romo rocks. But he gets help from his stable of stars and they did not disappoint. T.O. ripped off huge chunks of yards repeatedly last night, Jason Witten continues to be stellar and MB3 knows how to close a game. JJT has more on the Cowboys relying on their stars to win games, here. And Jason Witten gets some love in this article.

How about a special shout-out to the special teams for shutting down and shutting up Devin Hester? Hester challenged the Cowboys during the week to kick it to him and at first it looked the Cowboys might not. After the initial kickoff was angled and went out of bounds the Cowboys strategy was not to give him a chance. But Keith Davis was having none of that.
"I go straight to the sideline and say, 'Coach, we kick the ball to him and we'll cover,'" Davis recalled his conversation with Cowboys special teams coach Bruce Read. "He said, 'Alright.' We started kicking it and we made some great plays."
Credit Pat Watkins with some excellent coverage plays in this game. The only special teams mistake was the blocked FG.

Over the last two games the defense has stepped up its play. They will give up some passing yards, but they are stingy against the run and they are getting turnovers. Calvin Watkins discusses the defense.
But the Cowboys forced four turnovers, had three sacks, knocked quarterback Rex Grossman down six times and defended eight passes.
Yeah, it was the Bears, and their 30th-ranked offense, but the Cowboys' defense is supposed to control a game like this.
It did that in the second half.
"You are starting to see some of Wade [Phillips'] philosophy," owner and general manager Jerry Jones said. "We told the guys in training camp it was going to be a transition for them."
The big news is that DeMarcus Ware finally got in the sack column with a couple in this game. We need Ware to make a difference. Anthony Henry has had two good games in a row and we needed it with the absence of Terence Newman. And yes, it was good to see Newman back on the field. Here's another article on the defense.

But let’s give the last word on the Cowboys effort last night to Chicago coach Lovie Smith, who had this grin-inducing assessment.
"In the second half," Chicago coach Lovie Smith said, "Dallas did pretty much what they wanted to against us."
62 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Spencer
I'm pretty pleased with Spencer's play so far. The sack last night was nice of course, but remember in Ware's rookie year where teams were able to get him to bite inside and then run around him multiple times in the first 3-4 games? Well as far as I can remember that happened to Spencer once in the first game and that was it, someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
by mikedallas23 @ Blogging The Boys on Sep 24, 2007 10:35 AM CDT reply actions
Spencer
Mike,
I am very pleased with Spencer too. We are asking a lot of him as a rookie and he is producing. I expected to see some of the same rookie-like mistakes Ware made, but he seems to have caught on very quickly.
I remember when Ware would get victimied in his rookie season. YOu could see the play develop and say "Oh, no!"
Carpenter
Mike,
What are your thoughts on Carpenter? I keep hoping he will "turn the corner" and become worthy of his number 1 draft status. I think he is play O.K., but I expected better.
Your thoughts?
Carpenter
To be honest I don't even really notice when he's in the game. I just looked it up and he has 3 solo tackles on the year so I guess the stats kind of bear that out. I think Parcells did a pretty good job of identifying and developing young talent for us overall but Carpenter has to be considered a miss so far. But after last night who cares about one potential draft bust :)
by mikedallas23 @ Blogging The Boys on Sep 24, 2007 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Spencer
Being from Purdue I know I'm probably biased, but Spencer is a smart player with a ton of talent. In college as a DE there were times when he was double teamed at the line and there was a back behind them ready to pick him up. I fully expect him to become as dominate a player as Ware once he gets comfortable in his new position and gets some experience. The guy just doesn't make many mistakes and is almost always where he should be. Nowhere to go but up!
Spencer
Ellis' days are about over, I think.
Even if he were to come back tomorrow, he might get a courtesy start, but I doubt if he would last long as the starter. He would soon be giving Spencer a break instead of the other way around.
Spencer impresses me as having a huge upside.
If he becomes a good as Ware....
Ellis
may not return this season and if he does he is not taking over the starting DE position. Ellis, if he does come back must accept a back up role. Spencer is the real deal and only getting better.
by Cowboys81 on Sep 24, 2007 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Hats off to...
Besides the obvious standouts, hats off to...
Sam Hurd
Nick folk
Special teams...shut down Hester
The offensive line
The coaching staff. It is NICE to have a coaching staff that can actually make adjustments at halftime. (one of my biggest complaints about Parcells)
Patrick Watkins
Th entire defensive front 7
I think it was Remi Ayodele who JERKED that fumble out
I agree on adjustments
It used to drive me nuts watching other teams adjust and nothing special coming out of the Cowboys' staff. The first half seemed like business as usual - try to pass on 1st down (holding, false start, sack), run on 2nd and 20, pass on 3rd for 15, punt. I was gratified to see Garrett really understand what Chicago was giving (medium crossing routes, deeper outs), pass the ball aggressively and use the pass to set up the run.
My play of the game was the Cowboys about to punt, the Bears call time to get a guy off the field, Phillips changes his mind and goes for it on 4th and Romo picks it up. Gutsy stuff.
The defense also seems to get better as the game goes on.
Add one more HATS OFF to ...
Someone nobody has yet to mention: McQuistan!
For hustling back and making sure that blocked punt didn't turn into a touchdown. From the opposite side of the field. He was in the thick of it at the moment of the block, and got all the way back QUICKLY!
As far as Spencer, he is helping us forget that Carpenter is not there ... yet. Don't write Carpenter off too fast, not everyone develops at the same rate.
But Spencer has proven in just 3 games that he is a stud. He will only continue to improve. Great pick-up, Cowboys.
I also want to put in a plug for Spears and Canty (esp. Canty) ... for whatever you want to say about their short-comings, they are making it VERY tough to run on the Boys. Against a VERY solid Bears O-Line, they held their ground and forced the Bears to throw FAR MORE than they wanted.
Loved Romo's performance
who wouldn't? But I also recall thinking that TO is taking some hard hits and still going across the middle without fear. I hope he can stay healthy until Glenn gets back on the field or the young 'uns start getting free a little more often.
That Garrett and Romo can get this much productivity out of essentially two players in the passing game is nothing short of remarkable.
T.O.
Dunk,
I was surprised that T.O. and Whitten had such success last night. I thought the Bears would blanket them with more success. But T.O. and Whitten burned 'em bad.
Romo is amazing, passing accuracy, scrambling, and pocket presence.
Another thing that I think he has made GREAT strides in over the off season is protecting the football. I think he has turned a weakness formlast year into a great strength. Nice growth!
yeah
I was surprised as well. The Dolphins did a pretty good job covering them. I haven't watched the game again, so this might be off, but I think that's the poison Chicago had to pick - it seemed to me that they normally went man with Tillman on Owens (which Owens won about 60-70% of the time), the rest of the field in a modified cover 2 (for example sometimes having LB taking a man with safety help) and lots of LB blitzes. That left the center of field more open because LBs were all stacked in the box. The Dolhins' went more with their front four and had more LBs in coverage, so the middle was a little more jammed up. So it seemed to me that they were gambling on getting to Romo and at a minimum causing him to make bad choices and best case get the sack/turnover.
Romo still holds the ball a little loosely in traffic, but because he's moving much smarter by using the pocket and getting the ball out faster after moving, it hasn't hurt anything. I still think he needs to tuck it a little more.
FYI, Grizz
Your link to Spags goes to the 2nd page of the article. I started reading and was a bit confused at first...
:)
by Pete on Sep 24, 2007 11:33 AM CDT reply actions
Thanks, I fixed it.
by Dave Halprin on Sep 24, 2007 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions
Newman's Injury a Blessing?
Check this out from Cold Hard Football Facts:
ANOTHER CANDIDATE
Dallas CB Anthony Henry, who had a huge game in the Cowboys 34-10 win at Chicago last night, leads the NFL in both interceptions (4) and passes defensed (11). Those are incredible numbers through three games, a pace that would give him 20+ picks and 60 pass breakups.
Consider that last year, Asante Samuel led the league in passes defensed with 24 for an entire season, and had 10 interceptions. Henry’s nearly halfway to both numbers and has 13 games to go.
Henry ranked second in passes defensed a year ago with 22, but grabbed only two interceptions. More importantly, the Cowboys’ secondary has a Defensive Passer Rating of 66.9 – a big step up from last year’s 83.2.
by fortytwo on Sep 24, 2007 12:22 PM CDT reply actions
I don't know if it can ever
be a good thing to missing one of your best players, but it's an interesting point - basically that since they can't lean on Newman, Henry and Reeves have been forced to step up and Henry's done pretty well at it.
As I look around the blog sites
I am pleasantly surprised at how little respect the boys are still getting. On ESPN.com, people are still saying "they haven't played anyone good yet" and "the pats and colts could kill them."
I love it!! Keep disrespecting us, think that Romo sucks and our defense is terrible etc. As long as we keep winning games, our pros do their thing and the young guys keep stepping up, they can disrespect us all the way to the top.
Correct me if I'm wrong
But didn't they say that last year, then we dumped on the future Super Bowl-winning Colts? The media just doesn't learn.
by no1cowboysfan on Sep 24, 2007 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions
So true
I realized this as well as I was driving at lunch today listening to some sports talk radio. No mention at all of the Cowboys, other than the score of them game... but endless talk about the Patriots and how they're a lock for the Super Bowl. I'd say the offenses match up pretty well at this point, with a slight edge on defense to the Patriots. If our defense can gel a little more over the next two games, I think the Boys will knock off the Pats in Week 6.
by Citilicious on Sep 24, 2007 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions
If I had to rank the teams right now
just from what we've all seen by week three, I'd have the Pats ahead of the Cowboys. That's based on their offensive line, their defense and how hard to stop Moss is. They know their system and execute it to near perfection. I think the Colts are no better than the Cowboys and might be worse.
But it's early yet. I could even live with losing to the Pats as long as the Cowboys showed up and punched them in the mouth a little. It's not how good you are in week six, but how you finish the season. This Cowboys team is still learning the offense and defense, and we can see that by the steady improvement from week to week. If they can play with the Pats (which has had the same system and core players for the past seven years) in three weeks, they can challenge by season's end, assuming they get that far.
If Romo continues to start
games as he's done the first three of the season, they'll have little chance beating the Patriots, as they'll find themselves down 17 or 21 points, if the patriots jump on you early, they are tuff to beat.
I'm not sure it's Romo
Or least it's not all Romo. The play calling had them running too much for a Bear's team that was stacking the box. We also saw the blocking errors, drops and penalties.
But I do agree that they as a team need to get out of the gates faster. That means a better game plan up-front, and better execution from the outset.
thats not true
Romo starts games just fine, and how is it Romo's fault if the other teams scores, does he play defense??
improvement
One thing that gives me encouragement is that I think we still have a lot of room for improvement onb "D" and reasons to be optimistic that that improvement will materialize.
Newman will come back full time.
Roy will learn how to play his new "linebacker" position better
Hamlin, I think, already is improving
Watkins has room to get better and is
Tank will be joining us
Spencer will continue to improve
Ratliff will improve at the nose position and James and akin will get better at working to support him
Another thing that would really help
is Glenn coming back. Teams loading up the box and coming at the QB/RB would be forced to play more straight up or get burned deep.
Glenn
You're right. I forgot about Glenn coming back. That should be big on the offense.
It just seems to me that we have sound reason to believe that some areas on our team will get better than they already are..
I don't know enough about the other teams to gauge their capacity to improve their play from where they are, but I see a lot of areas on ours, and we are already 3 and 0.
Don't forget Pitt
The Steelers are playing very well right now too. They have a young quarterback that's won a super bowl so I'd have to put them and the Pats ahead of the Cowboys (for now). There's nobody in the NFC that scares me, not even the Packers.
Derek
by DerekSTheRed on Sep 24, 2007 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions
ESPN
I almost drove off the road the other day when Colin Cowherd said they aren't as biased as people accuse them of being. HA!
I am from Dallas, recently moved to Austin and I miss the Ticket so darn much. I thought at first it would be nice to get more national sports news but I realize now that all I get are Yankee and Patriot cheerleaders. All they see are T.O. and a new coach when they look at the Cowboys, and thats their problem.
Cowherd
Was making a big deal today about the Packers being better than the Cowboys, blah, blah, blah.
Said Dallas can't win in Green Bay in cold weather. Said there 3rd down conversion rate is too low, blah, blah, blah.
He's getting tougher and tougher to stomach.
you do realize Cowherd is a cowboy fan, right.
Cowherd is a diehard cowboy fan, All he was saying is that if the cowboys play in the playoffs in Greenbay, thats an advantage for the Packers because of the cold and that dallas is a warm weather team for the most part, which is true, he's not knocking the cowboys.
Not a Cowboys fan
I have listened to the show for a while now and have no idea where you'd get the idea that he is a Cowboys fan. All I have ever heard him do is bash the Boys and praise the Eagles. Even last year during our mid-season winning streak he was down on the Boys. I don't think I've heard him say 5 good words about the Boys.
Also he is from the Northwest, hardly think he is a Boys fan, but I could be wrong.
3 AND OH!
Dammit this is awesome. I haven't been this geeked up about my beloved Cowboys in over a decade. I am looking forward to an entertaining season!
by Richard Joke @ Blogging The Boys on Sep 24, 2007 12:50 PM CDT reply actions
season
Every game I predict who I think is going to be the stars for us. This season I am not doing so well with my predictions about individual players.
However, the one thing I think I was right on was, I predicted this was going to be a fun season. I got that one right anyway!
We are going to have a lot of fun watching our beloved 'boys play.
Taylor trade rumor is floating
Hey guys I was reading comments from another cowboys blog and the guy that runs the site just commented that he has it from a good source that the boys might be looking to trade for Jason Taylor. If this rumor proves to be true then it confirms that Ellis' return to the team is doubtful.
Cowboys are not trading for Taylor
thats not even a rumor that the dophins are entertaining trading him, plus we play a 3-4 defense, not a 4-3, it was just a Miami blog speculation, no truth to it at all.
Not to mention Taylor is sucking
right now. I'll take Spencer's continued improvement over a broken down taylor and disgruntled Ellis any day. If things continue at this rate, all Ellis can hope for is some chances on third down. But to trade for Taylor would be crazy.
I really hate ESPN
They're talking about the resurrection of TO this year? Did they forget he lead the LEAGUE in TD receptions last year? When was TO EVER a bad receiver? I think his career would have to tank before it could be resurrected...
ESPN
The only reason to watch ESPN is for Rachel Nichols. As far as J. Taylor is concerned, why would you handicap Spencers development with that trade. Its not gonna happen. This D is on its way up!
Marion the Barbarian
There is something that I just don't get about Barber: the guy is listed at 6'0", 220, so decent-sized for a RB but not Brandon Jacobs-huge or anything. And yet he NEVER goes down on first contact! I honestly don't know how he does it, I don't know if I've ever seen a back quite like him before.
by mikedallas23 @ Blogging The Boys on Sep 24, 2007 3:24 PM CDT reply actions
i dont know....
if you can go as far as saying youve never seen a back that does that. i think you just might have gotten accustomed to what youve seen here in the last few years since emmitt was dominate. i.e., jones, hammbrick, george, etc. falling down after the initial contact.
by jasonslb on Sep 24, 2007 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions
He explodes into contact
he never shies away and makes that pop at the last second so his momentum makes a collision bigger than he really is.
And he does that
by getting great leverage and power from his legs. It's some technique, but mostly physiological. Williams can do the same thing - generate tremendous force in a short space.
romo
the thing i kept on thinking about last night watching the game was everytime romo dropped back for a pass and avoided the rush by just stepping into or around in the pocket and the defenders were just this close to touching him was what if drew bledsoe was still the quarterback. he would have got sacked about 12 times and we would have probably lost convincingly. i think its just a testament to romos overall confidence and feel for the game.
last year when drew bledsoe would throw the ball downfield and the camera would pan towards the reciever, for that split second the ball was in the air, i hoped for the best but expected the worst. now when romo drops back and the same scenario happens, i always expect a positive outcome.
by jasonslb on Sep 24, 2007 4:42 PM CDT reply actions
Bledsoe
Rex reminds me a lot of a young, less talented Drew Bledsoe. The Chicago line has to play perfectly or it's a sack because Rex can't avoid the rush like Romo can.
Everyone is praising our OLine, but I don't think they're playing that much better then last year. We couldn't run the ball and Romo was ducking and weaving and bailing out the OLine constantly last night.
I'm not convinced that the play of Chicago's OLine was any different that Dallas's OLine play. The difference was one quarterback had the ability to evade and one didn't.
Derek
by DerekSTheRed on Sep 24, 2007 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
Romo definitely makes our O line look really good. Davis is a huge upgrade at RG, but other than that, they're the same.
Many QBs in this league can succeed when given time to throw (Manning, Brady, Palmer) but very, very few can succeed when being pressured (Romo)
Agreed...
Romo is making them look great, and he was Houdini last night. The one time he couldn't get away (when he scrambled and Urlacher popped him), he got right back up.
I will say this about the O-line, though: their sheer mass seems really effective in wearing the other side down. When we keep passing and the other team can't get pressure and Romo is constantly slipping away, the defense can't keep up. Then MB3 extracts their last remaining will to fight. I love it.
Exactly so
Two things - Davis pass blocks better than an injured Rivera, hands down. And even a solid Bears front seven were dead on their feet by the fourth quarter. They play just well enough to allow Romo to move around in the pocket rather than escaping from it.
oline
i agree about the oline. not sure how to word it without sounding or saying they arent good or playing well. but i think they are just ok. its just that i feel the big plays we were more a function of romo avoiding the sack and hitting the recievers or barber breaking tackles to make a big run.
by jasonslb on Sep 24, 2007 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions
My two cents
I am going to date myself with this comparison, but here goes: Romo reminds me of Fran Tarkenton, the way he avoids the rush by dipping his shoulders, ducking, bobbing and weaving, giving the receivers an extra second to get open, then slinging the ball down the field. Tarkenton used to drive me crazy the way he could do that. It is much more enjoyable to watch when it is the qb on your favorite team with that ability
absolutely
I said the same thing in an earlier thread, Tony has the best escapability within the pocket I've seen since Tarkenton and Staubach.
too far
no its not
there's nothing wrong with comparing a player's abilites to a HOF player.
Its not like I'm saying Romo right now is as good as Staubach, but only he has a lot of the same traits and characteristics.
Just like with Favre, unless you're blind or never watched Favre play, you can't but notice how similar Romo's game is to the GB legend. Thats the first thing I ever remember saying about Romo on this blog, how much he reminds me of Favre.
it is for me
Yeah
but Tark was so slippery, it was almost hard to watch. Romo to me is a little more Staubach-like because he doesn't move around that long before getting rid of the ball. Tark would still be moving around in the backfield while the half-time show was going on.
And I don't think anyone is saying that Romo is the next Staubach; he has a long way to get there and may never do it because at a minimum you can't account for injury or the team's talent falling off. All Roger and others are saying is that he has some similarities - mobility, field vision, accuracy, improvisational skills...
Yeah between Bledsoe and Vandershank
I practically needed counseling after every game last year. Those dudes had me traumatized

by 























