Cowboys vs. Redskins: What they're saying
Two guys on defense who made a couple of standout plays against the Redskins were DeMarcus Ware and Terence Newman.
Newman got the key INT late in the game when the Redskins were driving with the score 28-23. We’ve always known how good of a cover-corner T-New is but he’s never come up with the big interceptions. He got one on Sunday and he knew it was big because he celebrated after.
As a salute to the Cowboys wide receiver, Newman ran to the star at the 50-yard line following his interception and stretched out his arms while looking up through the Texas Stadium's famed hole in the roof, a la Owens in 2000 while he was with San Francisco rubbing in a touchdown reception here against the Cowboys.
"I did it for him because he had four touchdowns," Newman said.
Even Newman is in awe of the Owens! Newman offers a different explanation here.
"I was just feeling the moment," Newman said of the celebration. "I made a play to hopefully to seal the game and I just felt it. I wanted to do something for Texas Stadium for all the people that were there on the edge of their seats and give them a little show.
"I did my mini-T.O. impression and tried to give the crowd a little something."

DeMarcus Ware had a key sack and forced fumble and also forced Campbell into an intentional grounding call. Ware’s already got nine sacks for the season and has numerous hurries and hits on QB’s. But he got a little worn out on the evening.
The sack was Ware's ninth of the year, tying him for first in the NFC, just 2½ short of last year's career high. But Ware said that sack didn't come easy. All game he was battling Samuels, a task that wore Ware out.
Ware received two IV's from the training staff following the game after cramping badly in the fourth quarter.
"That guy's a beast," Ware said. "I'm not even going to lie; he's one of the best tackles I've ever faced."
No DeMarcus, you’re a beast and one of the main reasons we won the game. Paul Pasqualoni says Greg Ellis is partly responsible for Ware’s development.
"This is his third year now, and he's really starting to learn to pass rush," linebackers coach Paul Pasqualoni said. "I think he's benefiting from being with [Greg] Ellis. Greg's been through it, and he's not only helping him on the field, but in practice and in meetings."
Good thing Greg helps him in practice and meetings, because he sure didn’t help him on the field on Sunday. I kid Greg – sort of. I’ll give him a pass for one week because of his good play over the last few weeks. But, Ware could use a little help in the next game and that goes to all of the front seven, starters or substitutes.
And yes, Ware was getting a good jump on the snap because he saw something that he keyed on - but he won't tell us.
"I timed it a little bit," Ware said. "But I'm not going to tell you what I was keying on. It helped out, and I got a little edge, and that's what you need."

Poor Andre Gurode, there’s no place to hide when you mess-up like he did on Sunday.
"I know the coaches have faith in me and I have faith in them," Gurode said. "If you make a mistake, that's a common thing in football. You just have to be a man about it, realize what you did, get up, admit that you were wrong and try to get ready for the next play."
How about we work on technique or something? I saw at the DMN blog he blamed it on a slippery ball because he was sweating too much. That excuse doesn’t fly, I’m sure Gurode sweats copious amounts all the time.

Roy Williams accepts the blame for his mistake in pass coverage.
"I’ll take it," Williams said. "I was covering him. They didn’t even really sneak in behind me. I just opened up too fast and they scored and that was pretty much it."

"When you have a guy like T.O., you call a few plays and we didn't even get the look (we wanted)," Romo said. "Then we finally got the look. They were dropping everybody in coverage and it was nice to see that we can still attack the field when teams are going to put a lot of people back there."
"They tried to put a lot of safeties over the top and shade the linebackers out there," Owens said. "We did a great job of adjusting during the second half. There were some things we missed in the first half that we saw we could get those in the second half."
"He's just a great player," said Romo, who wasn't too bad himself, finishing the day completing 22 of 32 passes for 293 yards and four scores for a 124.1 quarterback rating. "He allows us to do a lot of things. But we had a lot of guys make some big plays. Sam Hurd made some big plays. I'm just excited that everyone played well. But obviously Owens stands out because of the four touchdowns and some big plays."
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
See?
One thing our boy Timmy from the DMN blog can't grasp is that Roy will take the blame when, oh, I don't know ... he's to blame?
All safeties have coverage mishaps. If every strong safety were perfect in coverage, I guarantee no one here would be reading this blog, because football would be boring as Hell.
And Roy didn't have a bad day overall. Not that the Dallas media will give him credit for it.
Roy is Roy
Sorry, but I don't know a strong safety in this league that is known as a "coverage safety" ... in fact, whenever any team completes a pass to a WR covered by a safety, the announcer is sure to say "that's a mis-match, a safety trying to cover a WR" ... Witten, Antonio Gates, etc. make a living toasting the league's safeties. And yet the guy that was HUGE last week stopping Jacobs and the Giant's rushing game is only a liability?
Sorry, not buying.
Can he be better in coverage? Sure. So can Henry and Reese and yes, even Newman. Can we scheme better to disguise his weaknesses? You bet, and when things are clicking on D, you can probably credit the schemes. But not only is Roy not going anywhere, he's a key piece of this D. Fans need to take the bad with the good.
I agree completely
saying Roy should get cut or traded are just assinine statements. He is a vital part of the defense and always will be.
He made an absolutely great tackle to get the Redskins off the field during a key drive in the ball game, yet nobody wants to credit him for that.
Just as Phillips stated in the post game PC, teams will move the ball on us through the air because they can't run on us. If you don't get constant pressure on the QB, its going to happen, I don't care who plays safety.
I got news for Roy haters, Hamlin is not much better than Roy in coverage and neither would anyone we would acquire through FA or the draft.
assinine statements
yeah, vital part of the defense and always will be!!! Only people that have no clue would make such a statement about Roy Williams. For a sixty minute game, the continuing Roy backers can only seem to search their brains to bring up one play a game, yes he made a third down stop on a run, good for him, thats his job!!! When theres a pile, I see Roy standing over it alot. What about the continuing pitch and catch that's going on all game, every game with the tightend. After touchdowns on Roy, you see him standing there looking around like he's totally lost. The Roy Backers will throw out, he lead the team in tackles for the game, WOW, when the other teams offense isolates you and attacks you all day, thats their gameplan, teams tell you as much before and after every game because you cant cover ANYONE, you will lead the team in tackles and TD's given up, but he wont lead the team in pass defensive breakups, that's for sure, because he's so far off the ball, you can berely see him in the picture. Then you hear its the scheme, wow, what scheme would you propose to hide Roy Williams, there isn't one known to man except, the pine scheme. The pine scheme you ask, THE BENCH!!!!!!!!!! Thats the only scheme I know that you can hide him, otherwise, the job of the strong safety is to cover the tightend, you cant give him help every play with a linebacker. Then for years, the excuse was we never had a free safety beside him since Darren Woodson. Yes. I agree with you on that, but that excuse is gone, Hamlin has been a major upgrade on the defense, he's the quarterback of the secondary and a big help to Roy with helping Roy with the presnap reads and making the adjustments, Something else Roy cant seem to grasp. Another excuse was we need to get him near the line to make plays, Wade's scheme will do that, we heard that for years and we also move him to the nickel backer in passing downs to get him closer to the line to make plays, but teams are passing on early downs to isolate Roy in coverage and take advantage of his horrendous coverage. Well, we're another year down the line with this highly touted overated player, he's in a new scheme, the scheme thats suppose to take advantage of his so-called tallents, if thats so, where are the quarterback sacks, where are the quarterback pressures, where are the game changing plays, besides the ones made for the other teams offense by his inabilities, where is the socalled leadership from this face of the team, the player that runs out of the back door after his horrible games.
All I see is the same lame excuses and a defense that spends way too much time covering up for the liabilities of this below average safety. I'm not asking for an all time great safty, we all know that isn't ever going to happen, but is average or a little above average or solid, too much to ask for when we're paying the money as if he is a top safety. Its time to keep the scheme, change out the player!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I know that I might be isolating Roy in this defense, and that there is also more problems with it than just Roy, and I agree with that, but the topic was Roy, but all I hear is from everyone that the defense is going to get better with time, but that time is running out, and Mr Fix it, his words isn't getting a grasp on this problem, right now our offense is covering up for a liabilities on defense, which seems to be getting worse with every game. You see receievers running wide open in our secondary.
WHEW, I feel much better, These are my major rantings of the day!!LOL
You make valid points Deke
But I just think it comes down to this: Roy is only one piece of the puzzle. When he draws single coverage, he's a liability. But so are most SS in those situations. When we decide to double Roys guy, it creates other openings... sound familiar? It's exactly the same reason that Witten has big games. Pick your poison, and for us, we decide to give you small chunks with Roy in single coverage rather than letting Moss run free deeper.
The result is what matters, and one touchdown before their late 4th quarter drive is good enough for me. Roy was a beast against Jacobs. In fact, NOBODY has been successful running on this defense. We give up dump passes, that is the worst you can say about this D... I'll take it.
Ok let me get this straight
Roy is the reason our run defense is so great, and if we were to replace him with Hamlin or whoever it would be significantly worse? Sorry I don't buy what you are selling.
I know you are trying to think up reasons why Roy is useful to this team, but when you already have a SS on this team (Hamlin) who is decent to good in coverage, in addition to be good against the run, its just hard to see why Roy shouldn't be cut.
And you don't understand my gripe with Roy. Its not that he is outmatched. The mismatch is not the problem. The problem is the mental mistakes. He just doesn't play smart. He has been doing it for awhile now and I don't see it changing.
by Burt D @ Blogging The Boys on Nov 19, 2007 12:14 PM CST up reply actions
two strong safeties actually
Keith Davis is the other. I get the feeling that he is no worse than Roy Williams. In fact they are pretty much the same player. Big hits, good against the run, liability in pass coverage.
by boysandbosox on Nov 19, 2007 2:11 PM CST up reply actions
heard this same type of rant about T.O.
last year and now you're revoking that it and in time you'll eat your words regarding Roy as well.
No.
I don't think anyone ever doubted TO's skill level. It is impossible not to doubt Roy Williams skill level. I wish it weren't so, but it is. I defended him for years but it is hard to ignore the obvious.
I used to have a debate with some Redskins fans about who was more overrated-Roy or Lavar Arrington. As it turns out, I think both were simply living off a reputation that they earned in college. Arrington's career ended before it became obvious that he was not a great player. We are already there with Roy Williams. Now the debate is-is he even a good player?
by boysandbosox on Nov 19, 2007 2:32 PM CST up reply actions
he needs credit
for that great open field tackle that stopped cooley (i think) 2 yards short of a first down on 3rd and long.
Really?
Yep, you guessed it, Roy Williams, but certainly he will blame someone else, actually pointing at the poor Bradie James who did a good job running underneath Cooley’s touchdown route knowing he has safety help over the top.
Maybe you should tell Bradie James that.
http://blog.dallascowboys.com/blogs/...
by Burt D @ Blogging The Boys on Nov 19, 2007 10:22 AM CST up reply actions
Grizz, great around-the-clock coverage!
Don't you ever sleep?
The coverage
was pretty bad, but as always, it gets worse when there's no pass rush. As Grizz points out, Ware got no help and Samuels did a good job limiting his opportunities.
Games like these give the coaching staff grist for the mill and if there is anything to like about their game planning it's that they don't continue to work losing strategies.
Roy Accepting Blame??
That's wonderful. Now the next step is correcting it and becoming the player you were your first two seasons in the league because you're officially a liability this year. I've been a huge Roy Williams fan but the guy's coverage technique blows and he's not making big plays at the line of scrimmage. He's a very average NFL safety this year.
by jmangell0830 on Nov 19, 2007 7:35 AM CST reply actions
Spags is down on Roy
He talks in his Mick shots about Roy's bad coverage skills and how he let Cooley get loose.
Look, I don’t care what they’re paying Roy, something’s got to give, and I actually saw a couple of plays he came off the field in a couple of the change-up defenses
I agree, we have too much riding on this season to let Roy kill us. Let Roy play on obvious run plays and bring in Watkins for passing plays, this is getting ridiculous.
Check out the story here
Spags is a homer
The fact he is down on Roy says something.
by Burt D @ Blogging The Boys on Nov 19, 2007 10:23 AM CST up reply actions
I strongly disagree...
as to Roy Williams NOT being a liability, he couldn't cover his posterior with a sheet off his girlfriend's bed. To me, he is almost solely responsible for giving up a TD as well as around 150 passing yards in each of the last two games. When Wade doesn't throw one of his players under the bus, that is admirable, but what Roy W does in coverage, defies verbal support.
Worried about Roy vs. Favre
In fact, worried about the whole secondary
but first things first...don't overlook the JETS, they are playing with nothing to lose with a new exciting quarterback (sound familiar?)
You guys are in HUGE denial
First of all most SS are good against the run, so Roy is nothing special in that respect.
Secondly, Roy is terrible in coverage. People openly say they look foward to playing against Roy Williams. You don't have that with most Strong Safeties in the league. How often do you hear people say they are going to game plan to get Bob Sanders in coverage, or Eric Weddle, or Laron Landry? You don't.
Fact of the matter is in today's NFL your safeties have to be at least somewhat decent in coverage, and Roy Williams is not even that. Hamlin was a SS in Seattle and he is at least decent if not pretty good in coverage. Roy is a dinosaur, and he is hurting the team. He need to be CUT NOW!!!
by Burt D @ Blogging The Boys on Nov 19, 2007 10:16 AM CST reply actions
Apparently...
Jason Garrett game planned to get LeRon Landry in coverage.
That being said, Roy was bad yesterday. As bad as I've ever seen him. He got turned around so badly on one hesitation move that even I got whiplash.
But then again, most of the rest of the secondary was bad as well. And the pass rush. And the kick coverage. And the center. And the running backs. Even the original Folk Hero managed to hook one to the right (I realize it was a 50-yarder, but at this point I'm holding him to a higher standard).
My feeling is that this was just one of those days where the entire team just had a bit of a brain fart. In cases like this, I always say to light a match, blame it on the dog, and try not to read too much into it.
It's the NFC East, these kinds of games happen.
by Big D Bam Bam on Nov 19, 2007 11:48 AM CST up reply actions

by 


























