The Dallas Cowboys future at CB
Yesterday, I posted my thoughts on the strategies available to the Cowboys to solve their shortage of running backs on the roster. In my opinion, the lack of running backs on the team besides MB3 is matched by the lack of cornerbacks behind the starters Terence Newman and Anthony Henry. These are the two most important positions that the Cowboys need to address in free agency and the draft. Today, I’ll look at the CB position.
So what’s available to the Cowboys? Well, in the free agent market there are not a lot of exciting players left that would significantly upgrade the Cowboys over what they had in Jacques Reeves. There are aging players like Brian Kelly, Ty Law and recently released guys like Andre Dyson and Fernando Bryant. There are also a lot of younger guys who have never really made their mark in the NFL who would be a risk.
There are players who are on the trade market. I think most Cowboys fans would love to get their hands on Lito Sheppard and his cap-friendly contract, but I doubt the Eagles would deal him within the division. The Broncos also reportedly want to trade RFA Domonique Foxworth. Then there are the ever-present rumors of the Cowboys trading for DeAngelo Hall and to a lesser extent, Pacman Jones. I can’t see the Cowboys trading for Hall unless they can re-work his contract past 2008. Why would you give up a hefty price for a player that can walk after the next year? You don’t, unless you sign him to a new deal. Can the Cowboys afford that right now? I doubt it. Then there are the Pacman Jones rumors which are mostly fueled by Pacman’s repeated desire to play in Dallas. He mentioned it again today, here. I don’t see much chance of this happening unless Pacman is willing to play for a Tank Johnson-type minimal deal, and even then the Cowboys would have to think twice. It’s hard to build a secondary around a player who could be suspended from the league at any moment.
Finally, the Cowboys could sign one their own, Nate Jones, but he would hardly be the nickel corner to inspire confidence.
So there are possibilities still available before the draft but either the player carries a lot of risk for various reasons or unlikely to be available to the Cowboys through trade. I have to admit here that it is much harder for me to grade the mid-level CB’s because I just don’t see enough of them in games and the stats available for CB’s just aren’t as thorough as they are for a RB, WR, DE or other positions. Sometimes, the lack of stats for a CB actually shows how good they are. Anyway I look at it; it’s just harder for me to grade CB’s.
The Cowboys also may be looking within, but I’m having a hard time believing that the Cowboys are willing to hand the "starter" nickel corner role to Alan Ball, Evan Oglesby or Quincy Butler. Of that group, Ball would be the most likely choice if they went that way, but the guy was picked in the 7th-round for a reason. I’m not saying a guy picked that low can’t be a quality starter (read: Jay Ratliff) but the odds are much longer. I saw Ball in the last training camp and came away unconvinced. There’s been a lot of talk from the Cowboys coaches that Ball has impressed this year in practice so maybe he has stepped up his game. Still, if he’s the answer then I’m nervous – to put it mildly.
Basically, I don’t see much happening between now and the draft that will brings us the nickel corner we so need. If that holds true, the Cowboys have to draft at least one corner and would be better served by drafting a couple. They also need to pickup one of those corners early in the draft, preferably in the first round.
At the top of most boards is Leodis McKelvin and climbing the charts right behind, occasionally surpassing him, is Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie. As it looks today, neither of these players will be available to the Cowboys when they are on the clock. If either of these players starts to "slide" and ends up in the middle-teen range, the Cowboys could make their play and move up to snatch them. This is a scenario I wouldn’t mind seeing at all.
After those two, you generally see Mike Jenkins and Aqib Talib, followed closely by guys like Brandon Flowers, Antoine Cason, Tracy Porter, and Justin King among others. So there is enough quality for the Cowboys to get a CB in the first round if they want one, even if they "reach" just a bit based on the so-called expert’s take.
If the Cowboys don’t sign or trade for a CB before they draft, they have to go after one on the first day of the draft. In my view, they shouldn’t wait and go ahead and pick one in the first round. And if they can get one of the top two in the middle-teens by trade, go ahead and pull the trigger.
0 recs |
17
comments
Read Related
Comments
Unlike many
I have CB at the top of my list, then WR, then RB. Wait, is it WR, then CB, then RB?
Seriously, based on the numbers of potentially solid RBs and the fact that WR is a developmental position that could be filled from within (I said could mind you), CB seems to me to be job one. Which is also why I just can't see trading to pick up McFadden, as good as he appears to be.
by dunkman on Mar 6, 2008 6:29 PM CST 0 recs
Thanks for replying dunk
did I write a bomb post here or what?
by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on
Mar 6, 2008 6:54 PM CST
up
0 recs
Of course
Personally I think this is the key position for Dallas' draft. If Jerry trades to take McFadden, he'll likely be passing on a WR and nickel corner.
But it could still make sense for Jerry - he hasn't signed MBIII to a long-term deal, he may believe that he can get a CB in the 2nd who can play and he may believe that Stand-back is ready to Step-up.
by dunkman on
Mar 7, 2008 5:24 PM CST
up
0 recs
Disagree
in that RB has to be job one on the list, especially when it's unknown if MB3 will be a Cowboy in less than two months, or if we can get him under contract before the end of the season.
There is no guarantee Jerry will match a deal another is willing to give MB3. If that happens we are left with one RB under contract and that's an unknown practice squad player. Jerry is drafting insurance and will spend a high draft pick on a RB this year. Either DMAC, Jones, Mendenhall or Stewart will be drafted by us.
Next in line is CB than WR. CB seems likely in the bottom of the first or second round.
by Cowboys81 on
Mar 6, 2008 10:18 PM CST
up
0 recs
Wow
That's about all I can say. The CB we take is only going to start off as 3rd corner. Eventually, he'll replace Henry. RB's can be found anywhere in the draft. This draft is the best chance we have to pick up a starting quality CB. The cost of filling that position through free agency is enough to choke a horse.
by APerfectStar on
Mar 6, 2008 11:44 PM CST
up
0 recs
Not only that
but a back up running back of lesser quality is much less damaging to the team when he's on the field than a CB. The 3rd corner gets really significant playing time because of all the multiple WR sets. Add to it the fact that Roy is not adequate in coverage and that guy must be a quality performer.
by dunkman on
Mar 7, 2008 5:20 PM CST
up
0 recs
I Think we should just let the draft come to us
I wouldn't want to lose our second rounder to be able to trade up for one of the top two. If those two are gone by the time we pick that probably means someone as good or better has fallen. Maybe that will mean someone like Sweed falls to us. I think Talib and Jenkins would be just as good as Cromartie or McLovin. I think as long as Jerry goes with drafting one of our three needs (CB, WR, RB) and sticks to their draft chart we should be good. The draft is such a crap shoot anyway, so I'd rather have three shots at making the team better than only two. That's also why I think its insane to package multiple picks to move up in the top 10.
by Valainferno on Mar 6, 2008 7:08 PM CST 0 recs
A top three or four CB
should be easily had with our first pick. I wouldn't mind Jenkins, McLovin or DRC. I read recently that Antoine Cason from Arizona ran a 4.4+. Which will move him up soon and increase the number of highly rated CB's. My understanding is he was a great CB, but everyone thought he was too slow.
by BigE on
Mar 7, 2008 8:16 AM CST
up
0 recs
your right "e"....Cason would be rated fourth...
only question is if he can make it to pick #22...the three others will be gone, and possibly him too...then what ?
go RB ? maybe
go WR ? maybe
trade down ? i hope not
or trade up and lock in one of the better CB's ?
hmmmmmmmm... i hate the silly season...
by BoyzRback07 on
Mar 7, 2008 10:45 AM CST
up
0 recs
I was just curious about the history of CB's
in the draft and when they were drafted - here's what I found.
This list shows at what number in the draft the 3rd and 5th CB's were drafted.
YEAR - 3rd CB - 5th CB
2007 - 20 - 53
2006 - 24 - 37
2005 - 50 - 57
2004 - 25 - 38
2003 - 28 - 31
2002 - 59 - 72
2001 - 24 - 45
2000 - 34 - 52
1999 - 23 - 26
1998 - 20 - 33
1997 - 9 - 24
I don't have a good feel if this is one of the best draft year classes for CB, and some may argue CB's are more important now, but there is a chance we could get the 3rd CB with our pick at 22.
by BigE on
Mar 7, 2008 1:59 PM CST
up
0 recs
Good post e
I was struck by 1997's draft. 5 CB's in the top 24. Who was in that draft?
by APerfectStar on
Mar 7, 2008 7:33 PM CST
up
0 recs
Shawn Springs was first
and then guys I never heard of before.
by BigE on
Mar 8, 2008 5:32 AM CST
up
0 recs
exactly...that's why it's DRC or bust....
I wouldn't touch anyone with our first pick unless it's Jenkins, DRC, or McKelvin...all the rest are 2nd rounders...Cason or Porter at pick 28...and that's a reach..
by BoyzRback07 on
Mar 8, 2008 12:29 PM CST
up
0 recs
Agree with Valainferno
Keep our picks and draft the best available athlete. Through the years this has been proven to be the best method, although none are fool-proof.
by RB on Mar 6, 2008 11:05 PM CST 0 recs
We debate this annually
I think we all agreed that it's actually BPAWR (best player available within reason). In this case I think they won't take a QB, O-lineman, punter, kicker, DL or OLB in the first round.
by dunkman on
Mar 7, 2008 5:28 PM CST
up
0 recs











